วีดีโอ

Can you provide clarity on what the risk and talent type is referring to.

9:20 "Make it discussable." She is speaking as an authority when she is merely looking through the window and talking about what she is seeing. Take the Toyota example when the senior person expressed a level of dialogue to help free the manager to open up to discuss problems they could help him with. The senior person abandoned his hierarchy authority of power and acted in a peer to peer manner. "Make it discussable" is a command and control approach. The senior person acted heterarchically in a peer to peer fashion.

This is very good

I can and i will do it

I can and i will do it

I'm starting a marketplace myself. In the MVP stage. Last year we got 512 orders this year we're projected to have 2,500. Lots of jewels in here, thanks.

Time codes: (0:00) Intro (11:01) Know what You can't know (16:20) Know what your Customers can't know (20:06) Discovery over Roadmaps (28:40) Data over Opinions (33:00) Outcome over Output (37:55) Designers over Design by Committee (42:00) Collaboration over Consensus (47:23) End Users over Developers (49:22) Pivots over Plans (51:27) Culture over Process (54:38) Questions

25:24building grit

cool

Will Smith is no longer credible to me after witnessing his personal life. I'm glad some people can appreciate this but like her book, this is just too much word salad for me. I tried and just can't get pass her presentation. I prefer to get to the meat and potatoes.

But Amy in reality people are fired for being honest about the damage leadership does to them... I've seen Employee relations side with Leadership to target those employees who speak the truth. So many organizations work this way.

3:50 “I’m married to the white Will Smith.”

@angeladuckworth is a rockstar

“If you gonna quit, quit on a good day. Don’t quit on a bad day.” Like it🙌

this was very enlightening! I always struggled with self control, until i applied these strategies- now i know why it works. Thank you !

Thank you and where do we get the email address?

So what do I need to do to get better?

"you got an answer in 10 minutes, which is quite good!" Man how things have evolved, now the bar is no longer how fast you get an answer, that became instantaneous with LLMs, now the bar zero-shot answers: how good the LLMs are to infer the best answer to your question no matter how bad written it is. No question why QnA sites now became irrelevant.

This was amazing

Transcript for "Agile vs Waterfall" (18:22): - I meet this all the time: companies that say that they're Agile but in all meaningful senses they're not. - So, in those situations what are you seeing? What are they saying that they think they are Agile but that's actually waterfall? - Well, this is whole idea of these phases is very waterfall concept. Now I say that there's really 3 things that honestly I care about: 1. The first one is: are we actually tackling the risks up front? There's: Value, Usability, Feasibility, Viability - these are the risks in all product and we need to make sure we are tackling those before we write a line of software for Delivery. 2. The seconds is: how you actually solving that problem? Are you solving it with Product Manager defining requirements and designers doing wireframes and engineers coding or they literally side by side coming up with prototypes because that's critical that we have those three, and waterfall kind of separates those. 3. And third and really the most important one as far as the defining characteristic is: before you go into dellivery to building things are you consciously saying: "Yes, this is what we want to go to build"? If yes that's unfortunatelly a defining characteristic of waterfall because we really don't succeed when we ship that feature we successd when we actually solve the problem. So, you don't wanna have a phase that says: "all right, we've done all our design or whatever and now we're into implementation" because in truth we're gonna be iterating many times and so the success is not launching a feature, the success is our KPI has finally achieved what we needed it to achieve. If we're trying to improve our international purchases to 5%, once we hit that 5% we've actually achieved. When you have Agile sort of the way as it's intended to be this is what we're really doing: you've got an Empowered Team that is trying to solve a problem not just about to ship a feature.

brilliant

set speed @ 0.75... ur welcome

Pottery is great. You can apply such knowledge to everything. No need to limit people from exploring great subjects such as pottery.

Deliberate practice 1) specific goal. 2) specific weaknesses. 3) immediate feedback. 4) repeat till effortless mastery. thinking that you could be doing worse stuff optimists focus on what they can change about their life. see negative events through 3rd person perspective

Amazing questions and answers, thanks guys!

Nice podcast! I really liked how the second part of the chat went to. Very clear questions and answers!

阿拉斯加具俄羅斯最近的只有五十五英里 封閉北極海進行搶救

Not being afraid to die on a treadmill sounds like extremely low self esteem and self loathing. You don’t have to die on treadmill to be enough, will.😅

there’s also curiosity and confidence in ones ability to find answers

I don't get the chart at 20:05, how the grit is measured. So, students have higher grit than special forces officers?

5:46 idk if this girl being satirical or something but there is no reason for transactions to stay online because parents just gonna get the baby sitters number after they have a good experience with someone on the marketplace and just pay cash after they find someone they like and trust. Always challenging getting non promiscuous demand to stay online

Good interview, wish it didnt black out every 15 seconds or so, can you re-up without that ? or maybe there is a audio only podcast on apple?

The problem is that most of what she says is correct AND implemented already. As the problem keeps growing we may wish to consider a complete different complementary view

A main message I take from this interesting interview is: being nice is not a profession

the interviewers does not fit the context

When the Nuclear Navy investigates mistakes made by plant operators, they have a small set of categories to explain the source of the error. "Undue sense of urgency" is one of the more common causes.

It's fascinating the way she describes curiosity. If I hear someone say something that I do not respect, the strongest reaction I can have is to lose curiosity for them and their ideas.

great insights. it's a bit annoying when some of these people use acronyms willy nilly assuming everyone knows them. great job from the host to give explanation.

The answer at 16:31 is what I always wonder. Good to hear from someone in a similar niche. The facilitator is great at asking these questions. It's like she knows what doubts I have in mind. Good stuff right here. Thanks 👍🏾

Great interview. Interestingly, the recording starkly highlights Amy’s point that women are less likely to speak up even when they have something useful to say. Not one woman asked a question,

Thanks for sharing!

Great job by the interviewer, juggling so many questions and ideas. Loved every second.

Thanks for sharing this. Great video. I love the 'Europe' example.

This is gold 🌟🌟🌟🌟 I'm coming back after 2 days

At 26:20, it's interesting that after asking a question about gender differences -- which almost always put women at a disadvantage in the workplace -- the interviewer stops listening to Dr. Edmonson's response and starts a silly, distracting nonverbal interaction with an audience member. The look of irritation on her face, though momentary, is unmistakable. Would he have dared do that with a male guest of similar status? It doesn't make him a villain. But, as she points out earlier in the video, our task is to build self awareness of our impact.

Sadly Will Smith has a situation with mental illness. Undermining your point

quite interesting, thanks for adding this session

Thank you very much...the questions were to the core..the replies were direct...Thank you for your time

it's great to hear these success stories but really not helpful to hear "we threw up a website". i think most of us might be here for the "how". I'm out $4500 so far and still don't have a functioning site.

Thanks for this, so much experience concentrated