Wow. A totally different and logical talk on Buddhism and Hinduism. Very interesting. You may post more on this line with this Madam. Very deep understanding.
At right time right person explain the Ambedkar. Comparatively Hindu with Buddhism , Buddhism more emphasised the ethics. Sir, Vedic literature for vedic people alone. Each vedic clan had its own law books. Evidence sacred books of East vol-2
மாரியம்மன் கோவில் ஈஸ்வரன் கோவில் பெருமாள் கோவில் கருப்பராயன் கோவில் இதுவே நம் இந்தியாவில் வளர்ந்து நிற்கிறது இதை நம்பி ஓம குண்டம் போடுதல் அர்ச்சனை செய்தல் இந்த மூடநம்பிக்கைகளை தான் மக்கள் விரும்புகிறார்கள் புத்தர் போதனைகள் வளர மக்கள் நல்வழி பட நம் இந்திய மக்கள் அனைவரும் ஒத்துழைக்க வாழ்த்துக்கள்
Nisha karma may be taken from, Assevagam,in ancient Tamil lit song "Yathum orre" stress naturalism Life goes as it is(நீர்வழிப் படூஉம் புணைபோல் ஆருயிர் முறை வழிப் படூஉம் என்பது திறவோர்) it is my inference.
What is the view on teo Buddhist governments viz.Srilanka and Myanmer?Are they not butchering their minotities? Why Dalailama is seeking refuge in India a predominantly Hindu nation rather than Te 6:20 ravada Buddhist nation?
i am having a doubt.There are 3 miseries in life viz old age sickness and death. For old age he should construct old age homes. For sickness he should construct more hospitals.For death he should construct more burial grounds.Why go for inquiry?Our Siddhas tried to cure by Herbals and meditation.Moreover doer is changing no one can be punished as there are infinite selves.
Professor, if v can remember the so called Hindu low caste kaniykumar district people how suffer .(even dress code). To escape from that the subbcaste people convert into Christians.
@@chandrasekar3424 Ambedkar was very Wiseman except in choosing Buddhism. If he had chosen Christianity, Bharat would have become a global power with the support of global Christianity!?
@@hrk4475 In India, Christianity miserably failed to establish equality among the followers. Here in India the same caste hierarchy system accepted by church bishops. These bishops never struggled to establish equality in Christianity. That's why Ambedkar didn't chose Christianity. Actually Dr. Ambedkar chosen Sikhism for conversion initially, but there also caste notions among Sikh Gurus shocked Ambedkar. Then finally he chosen Buddhism, but he knows that this process will not give immediate results as like of Sikhism. Anyhow Ambedkar felt much satisfied by choosing a religion like Buddhism which is native to India and anti-brahmanism. Yes Buddhism is our mother religion which followed by masses from kashmir to kumari before Musalmaan's invasion.
@@chandrasekar3424 in India, many Dalits have become the bishops. Ambedkar knew it. Church practice equality although some foolishly claim caste system. It is not the failure of church. If some fails in examination, no one say that the college fails. If someone in the church fails, no need to blame the church. Church teaches and practices equality. Ambedkar knew it. But Ambedkar rejected Christianity for fearing Hindutva forces, not for caste system. As I said, Among the bishops in India, majority are so called dalits.
All false propaganda about Krishna. There is no compulsion to believe in Krishna. If one wants to do Krishna Bakthi he can do and there are benefits but that too one need to experience and these are not just words to follow. Saying all three in say way is so much misleading and dividing the majority of Bharat. If one does not believe in Krishna he doesn't go to hell, it is not the same with Abrahamic religions. Dr. M Susithra is just doing false propaganda without critically analysis. No reference to what BG tells about 2nd person?! In that sense what was said about the difference between a varna person born in head and the other parts?! Is there a separate place for downtroddens?! Go and tell in Pandirpur you will know what it means. She does not have any knowledge on either Hindu dharma don't know what is prova-mimasam or uthara-mimasam or Buddha Darma both speak dharma and based on certain basic principles that are aligned. Actually budhha dharma is hindu dharma without God. No one wants to understand these - half baked quotes are just misleading. Naimitika includes any non-daily ≠ Kamya Karmas done with a desire. No two words in sanskrit give similar meaning and can mean many. Example, naimitika Karma marriage, but it is not a Kamya Karma. Nothing critically explained or understood. Dr. Ambedkar can have his views but it can be challenged as it is not his core knowledge area, assuming that he had great knowledge is itself wrong, if so, were and on what basis did he get these knowledge and what we're their source?! Was it a western sanskrit scholar whom he referred?! Even if we assume it to be true? What about the reference of dharma of king in war?! Was it not his dharma?! What about other Verna's?! Does it mean that others were devoid of dharma (performing yagnas? Can one reference such a sudhra devoid of the word dharma?!) Thus confusing the word dharma to show Hindus in bad light is this aim, I guess. Who was Gargi in vedha then?! "teacher of religion", we have so many real life examples like alwars and nayanmars and Panduranga bakthas who are respected from all caste and gender. Even Ramayan is written by a forest tribe 😀 held in high esteem. Regarding the Guna it is so silly?! Is the nature so flexible that when sattvik the lion will start becoming eating grass like deer?! What a logic?! Nature do have difference to a great extent and the Guna Karma is a good concept explained by Krishna. Not only that, there is no guarantee for moksha even if one is born Brahmin nor is it said to be not given to other chathurvarna. Why in war one should be speaking about bramin that too get money or not. What a misconception. Very very sad. 😭. Buddha did not leave Vedic dharma. As per this lady budhha is not ahimsa alone Wow and budhha influenced western liberty, equality and fraternity 😂. Great 👌
Very good explanation, thanks madam
சிறந்த கருத்தை சிரிப்போட சொன்ன தோழருக்கு வாழ்த்துக்கள்
நல்ல உரையாடல் இருவருக்கும் நன்றி
சிறப்பு.ஜெய்பீம் நமோபுத்தா.
அருமை அம்மா.
அருமை
மதிப்பிற்குரிய பேராசிரியர் அவர்களுக்கு வணக்கம்.
இன்றுதான் இந்த
Wow. A totally different and logical talk on Buddhism and Hinduism. Very interesting. You may post more on this line with this Madam. Very deep understanding.
A very fantastic deed!
Jaibheem♾️❤🔥
Good conversation. Thank you both of you. 9-12-22.
Thinkyou Mam
அருமை.
At right time right person explain the Ambedkar.
Comparatively Hindu with Buddhism , Buddhism more emphasised the ethics.
Sir,
Vedic literature for vedic people alone. Each vedic clan had its own law books. Evidence sacred books of East vol-2
Fantastic
நானும் புத்த மதத்தை தழுவி கொண்டேன் .
வாழ்த்துக்கள்
congrates
hi
namo bhuddhaya ....
மாரியம்மன் கோவில் ஈஸ்வரன் கோவில் பெருமாள் கோவில் கருப்பராயன் கோவில் இதுவே நம் இந்தியாவில் வளர்ந்து நிற்கிறது இதை நம்பி ஓம குண்டம் போடுதல் அர்ச்சனை செய்தல் இந்த மூடநம்பிக்கைகளை தான் மக்கள் விரும்புகிறார்கள் புத்தர் போதனைகள் வளர மக்கள் நல்வழி பட நம் இந்திய மக்கள் அனைவரும் ஒத்துழைக்க வாழ்த்துக்கள்
Buddha❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️☸️☸️
ஒரு சிங்கம் மானை கொள்கிறது இது இயற்கையால் அமைக்கப்பட்டவை இதுவே கர்மா வினையாகும்
Millions of common people genocidal happened due to the hatred mentality of Hitler against Jews. What about these millions of people's Karma?!!!
Lion kill other animals only for his need of food. But humans kill others for various reasons.
விடுதலையைப் பற்றி பேசிய மகான் புத்தர்
Truth
ஆதிக்கம் ஆட்டம் ஆட தொடங்கும் போது நியாய போதனை தடுக்க முயல்வர்..
பிராமணர்கள் என்றால் சும்மாவா..தன்னை யாரும் மீறகூடாது என்பது அவர்களின் வேட்கை..
Nisha karma may be taken from,
Assevagam,in ancient Tamil lit song
"Yathum orre" stress naturalism
Life goes as it is(நீர்வழிப் படூஉம் புணைபோல் ஆருயிர்
முறை வழிப் படூஉம் என்பது திறவோர்) it is my inference.
"Yaadhum oore"...
"Yaadhum oore"...
Unamayana manitha neyam ulla matham alla aagamam, markham. Hindu matham piramanan payithyam.
What is the view on teo Buddhist governments viz.Srilanka and Myanmer?Are they not butchering their minotities?
Why Dalailama is seeking refuge in India a predominantly Hindu nation rather than Te 6:20 ravada Buddhist nation?
புத்தர் மதத்தை படைக்கவில்லை, தன்னை வழிபட சொல்லவில்லை.
i am having a doubt.There are 3 miseries in life viz old age sickness and death. For old age he should construct old age homes. For sickness he should construct more hospitals.For death he should construct more burial grounds.Why go for inquiry?Our Siddhas tried to cure by Herbals and meditation.Moreover doer is changing no one can be punished as there are infinite selves.
Professor, if v can remember the so called Hindu low caste kaniykumar district people how suffer .(even dress code). To escape from that the subbcaste people convert into Christians.
Periyar ask to chose the islma but ambedkar chose the bhuddist is failed...First ambedkar chose Islam later he change because of Politics...
Really Ambedkar chosen Sikhism at very first, not Islam. Study him completely.
Is he accept karma is cause for suffering told by BUddha
No, Buddha said that "Desire is the root cause of suffering".
புத்தர் விடுதலையை பேசினாரா?
திசைதெரியா வெத்து துறவறத்தை பேசினாரா?
இரண்டாவதுதான் அதிக சாத்தியம்.!
Read books about Buddha written by Dr. Ambedkar. You will understand better.
@@chandrasekar3424 Ambedkar was very Wiseman except in choosing Buddhism. If he had chosen Christianity, Bharat would have become a global power with the support of global Christianity!?
@@hrk4475 In India, Christianity miserably failed to establish equality among the followers. Here in India the same caste hierarchy system accepted by church bishops. These bishops never struggled to establish equality in Christianity. That's why Ambedkar didn't chose Christianity. Actually Dr. Ambedkar chosen Sikhism for conversion initially, but there also caste notions among Sikh Gurus shocked Ambedkar. Then finally he chosen Buddhism, but he knows that this process will not give immediate results as like of Sikhism. Anyhow Ambedkar felt much satisfied by choosing a religion like Buddhism which is native to India and anti-brahmanism. Yes Buddhism is our mother religion which followed by masses from kashmir to kumari before Musalmaan's invasion.
@@chandrasekar3424 in India, many Dalits have become the bishops. Ambedkar knew it. Church practice equality although some foolishly claim caste system. It is not the failure of church. If some fails in examination, no one say that the college fails. If someone in the church fails, no need to blame the church. Church teaches and practices equality. Ambedkar knew it. But
Ambedkar rejected Christianity for fearing Hindutva forces, not for caste system.
As I said, Among the bishops in India, majority are so called dalits.
@@chandrasekar3424 As soon as one claims he is Buddhist,it is automatically known as Dalit.
So Buddhism can never eradicate caste system.
All false propaganda about Krishna. There is no compulsion to believe in Krishna. If one wants to do Krishna Bakthi he can do and there are benefits but that too one need to experience and these are not just words to follow. Saying all three in say way is so much misleading and dividing the majority of Bharat.
If one does not believe in Krishna he doesn't go to hell, it is not the same with Abrahamic religions.
Dr. M Susithra is just doing false propaganda without critically analysis.
No reference to what BG tells about 2nd person?! In that sense what was said about the difference between a varna person born in head and the other parts?! Is there a separate place for downtroddens?! Go and tell in Pandirpur you will know what it means.
She does not have any knowledge on either Hindu dharma don't know what is prova-mimasam or uthara-mimasam or Buddha Darma both speak dharma and based on certain basic principles that are aligned. Actually budhha dharma is hindu dharma without God.
No one wants to understand these - half baked quotes are just misleading.
Naimitika includes any non-daily ≠ Kamya Karmas done with a desire.
No two words in sanskrit give similar meaning and can mean many.
Example, naimitika Karma marriage, but it is not a Kamya Karma.
Nothing critically explained or understood. Dr. Ambedkar can have his views but it can be challenged as it is not his core knowledge area, assuming that he had great knowledge is itself wrong, if so, were and on what basis did he get these knowledge and what we're their source?! Was it a western sanskrit scholar whom he referred?!
Even if we assume it to be true? What about the reference of dharma of king in war?! Was it not his dharma?! What about other Verna's?!
Does it mean that others were devoid of dharma (performing yagnas? Can one reference such a sudhra devoid of the word dharma?!) Thus confusing the word dharma to show Hindus in bad light is this aim, I guess.
Who was Gargi in vedha then?! "teacher of religion", we have so many real life examples like alwars and nayanmars and Panduranga bakthas who are respected from all caste and gender. Even Ramayan is written by a forest tribe 😀 held in high esteem.
Regarding the Guna it is so silly?! Is the nature so flexible that when sattvik the lion will start becoming eating grass like deer?! What a logic?! Nature do have difference to a great extent and the Guna Karma is a good concept explained by Krishna. Not only that, there is no guarantee for moksha even if one is born Brahmin nor is it said to be not given to other chathurvarna.
Why in war one should be speaking about bramin that too get money or not. What a misconception. Very very sad. 😭.
Buddha did not leave Vedic dharma.
As per this lady budhha is not ahimsa alone Wow and budhha influenced western liberty, equality and fraternity 😂. Great 👌
Shambooka?
@@sakthiprasana samboogha 😂
@@AnandRajappan What's the justification for the injustice did to Sambooka?
@@sakthiprasana why you want to get justification for sambooka who was a representation of samboogha 😂. Go to SC and ask.
Such a big non sense
Eradaimalai taan paraiyar jaathi talavar