holy shit bro i was lost for a whole semester lost for half of your video then at the end everyhting clicked if i pass my final tomorrow its on you bro
Does the heat transfer rate also follow the inverse square law; double the surface area, quadruple the heat transfer rate, all else remaining the same? Such that if a one-unit area transfers 1 watt per unit of time, then a two-unit area would give a 4 watt per unit of time transfer. Does this really work out?
One thing I am currently stuck on with using this table in my Heat Transfer class, is actually determining which case to use when given a problem. I understand just about everything else in this chapter besides the difference(s) in which case to use. Can someone help try and explain because I sometimes do not trust my "engineering intuition".
@@jay.jay. meaning all the heat transfer is only transferred in the one +x direction, so does not have to double the area when working out the heat transfer.?
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
wow, I am so happy I stumbled upon your lectures.
Same
popping up the one direction meme was unexpected and cute, thanks for clear explanation >33
holy shit bro i was lost for a whole semester lost for half of your video then at the end everyhting clicked if i pass my final tomorrow its on you bro
did u pass?
@@mrrataa7882 yes
I might be wrong but I think you forget to multiply cross sectional area in the conduction term at minute 10:41. Still very helpful thanks
perfect lecture
thank you from Iran
at 10:53 did you mean to multiply the (k dT/dx) by A_c as well? I think you may have forgotten this. Otherwise, great video. Very helpful!
Does the heat transfer rate also follow the inverse square law; double the surface area, quadruple the heat transfer rate, all else remaining the same? Such that if a one-unit area transfers 1 watt per unit of time, then a two-unit area would give a 4 watt per unit of time transfer. Does this really work out?
Great lecture. Thank you :)
That was amaizing. Thank you sir.
One thing I am currently stuck on with using this table in my Heat Transfer class, is actually determining which case to use when given a problem. I understand just about everything else in this chapter besides the difference(s) in which case to use. Can someone help try and explain because I sometimes do not trust my "engineering intuition".
hit and trail is your best freind
Can you explain how to calculate fin depth in corrugated tank? Plz
Sir area of cross-section of fin should increase or decrease it's along its length please reply
This was very helpful, Thank you!
what does m stand for there?
is it mass?
Great lecture, may I know the references of your topic Sir?
Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Theodore L. Bergman et. al
by saying heat transfer is one dimension, does that mean you onlyuse one side of the fine for the heat surface area?
The heat transfer AREA is perpendicular to the flow of the heat. Imagine heat going through in one direction (x direction) THROUGH that surface
@@jay.jay. meaning all the heat transfer is only transferred in the one +x direction, so does not have to double the area when working out the heat transfer.?
@@MkhuluMokoena yeah
Great thanx
@@MkhuluMokoena you are welcome :)
Thank you very much
1 direction 😅 👍❤️
Yes they are awesome
احسنت
one direction joke was nice xD