Thanks for your feedback. I have created a new video which is more related to the function of the technology in hydrogen vehicles -> th-cam.com/video/p5BYBSk_MQk/w-d-xo.html
In the year 2000 the thought of a electric car that could be performance and travel more than 100 miles was laughed at as a fairy tale. Now no one is laughing. Hydrogen is NEW and the technology is developing fast along with all the nay sayers saying this won't work. Hydrogen cars fuel in a few minutes. Teslas .. almost an hour. I much rather be driving.
’m here to tell you that that is not Gods revelation, obviously you have been mislead , I go by What the bible teaches and the bible does not teach of hell fire , velation 16:14,16 - Satan is now "MISLEADING the entire inhabited earth". Jesus called him the "god of this world",(2 Cor. 4:4; 1 John 5:19) Demonic spirits manipulate people (like puppets) and even put on an angelic appearance or voice. Satan is called the "angel of light".
nothing all government and all authority and power.e 25 For he must rule as king until God has put all enemies under his feet.f 26 And the last enemy, death, is to be brought to nothing.g 27 For God “subjected all things under his feet.”h But when he says that ‘all things have been subjected,’i it is evident that this does not include the One who subjected all things to him.j 28 But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him,k that God may be all things to everyone.l So don’t you get it Jesus is going to hand back the kingdom to God
@@donwilson6965 Have I not already written you, Imparting advice and knowledge, You kept neglecting all my advice And rejecting my reproof, They refused my advice; They disrespected all my reproof. I possess good advice and practical wisdom; Understanding and power are mine. The way of the fool is right in his own eyes, But the wise one accepts advice. Presumptuousness leads only to strife, But wisdom belongs to those who seek advice. test those That say I lie I have loved you
Hydrogen boleh di proses dihasilkan untuk menjadikan gas pada enjin tersebut. Berbanding bahan api lain seperti NGV, petrol, disel mahupun nitrogen gas untuk kegunaan sesebuah enjin perlu didapatkan dari luar atau stesen stesen tertentu. Untuk hydrogen, gas boleh dihasilkan dengan adanya air, campuran bahan kimia dan elektrik yang boleh didapati pada enjin tersebut selain stesen pump gas hydrogen yang di khususkan sepertimana stesen pump minyak yang lain.
This is clearly funded by the oil gas companies 😂 you literally fill up with a garden hose the drive away the only exhaust is water vapor 😂😂 this video suggests that it’s going too be toxic too our environment
Great video! I love how you broke down the workings of hydrogen cars in such an easy-to-understand way. The potential of hydrogen fuel cells is fascinating, and I can't wait to see how the technology evolves. Keep up the amazing work 😉
See also this video. It provides a more detailed breakdown of how hydrogen cars work in terms of their parts and functions -> th-cam.com/video/p5BYBSk_MQk/w-d-xo.html
I think technology will advance and hydrogen powered vehicles will become practical and economically viable. And the technology and the process for producing hydrogen will be truly green. Even the technology for producing lithium ion batteries isn't green either .
Ironic you call electric cars crappy….. they’re literally hybrid ‘hydrogen-electric’. Hydrogen gas supplies the electrical potential to power an electric motor to drive the wheels. So what’s crappy about electric? Do you mean battery electric cars?
Before gas engine, you had steam engine. Hydrogen is hard and expensive to harvest (so was gas and oil) but like any other problems, I’m confident we will solve it. Already, Toyota has something promising. I can foresee Hydrogen powered vehicle within the next ten years.
The problem is gasoline is a readily available source of energy. You just have to drill it out. But free hydrogen molecule isn't available in large quantities naturally. You actually have to spend energy to separate it from compounds. It'll get expensive once scaled. You can say the same thing for EV batteries, that we have to charge ourselves, but charging efficiency for Li-ion batteries is around 90%. Hydrogen extraction efficiency ranges from 30-40% if you're dissociating water. However, since Hydrogen is so light compared to Li-ion batteries, I think it makes up for its inefficient extraction because it costs less fuel to carry hydrogen than heavy Li-ion batteries.
But the question is "Why?!" Why use hydrogen when you already have BEVs? It's like taking the very longer route in going from point A to point B just because you can! Let's take into consideration the best case scenario for hydrogen: it's produced by electrolysis of water using electricity from solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear sources i.e. it's 🟢 hydrogen. Even though it's a carbon neutral process, you have to consume energy just to make energy which is non-sensical. This energy can simply be sent into the grid and it can power EVs at homes or at EV charging stations just like that! Instead, we have to purify water to electrolyse it and build a whole new bunch of different infrastructures like electrolysers, supply chains, safety systems, dispensing stations etc. All this costs a lot of time and money to build and maintain, something that is not true for BEVs since we already have a grid in place which is 70% of the job done! Then imagine the inferno that would be caused if there was a leak. Petrol at least needs a flame to ignite, hydrogen does so just by coming in contact with the oxygen of air! Thus hydrogen is more hazardous than fossil fuels. And finally, researchers have said that large scale leaks of hydrogen can also potentially act as a greenhouse gas. So you would have to be total muppets to use hydrogen instead of electricity for EVs.
The membrane or the fuelcell stacks that exchanges hydrogen to electrical energy are troublesome and must be replaced with other components once a year or every 6 months. The membrane is like what you usually see in the RO water filter, except larger depending on the design it can be a rectangle or cylinder with built in heat exchange or cooler. It's very expensive, $10,000 or more to replace it a long with other components. The car works like a hybrid car, battery and all. The coolant to cool the membrane or the fuelcell is another issue to worry about.The membrane only lasts about 6 months to a year, depending on how the car is used. If you park the car for a very long time like a month or so, the system will clog up. Then the membrane and cooling components have to be replaced before you can use the car. The car has to be towed into the shop autorized dealer. So far, there are NO mechanics at the dealer that can work on the cars, due to its complicated system. You must wait for a trained scientist mechanic from Toyota Japan to fly in for your service on an electrical problem.
You didn't mentioned the amount of water required to product 1 kg of green hydrogen. You didn't mentioned that large amount of electricity is needed to product green hydrogen.
The author is so stupid to understand that as he didnt know how it will impact the use of our water resources 🤷♂️ which is it is better to deplete the lithium battery resources than our water supplies... He didnt even know how much energy/electricity it would need just to produce liquid hydrogen 🤦♂️
Very concise video and well done, but at 1:56 is a bad graphic. You're showing an ICE H2 engine, not a fuel cell. ICE H2 engines require more like 10+ times the energy as BEVs. And regarding 3 times for fuel cells, that's best case at the moment where as the H2 is delivered via pipeline. If you have to truck it compressed, or worse liquefy it, it's more like 4 times the energy per mile. It's an OK technology to fit where other technologies can't meet the specific requirements.
Yeah but ICE gives people real cars not some appliance like experience with electric drive + Fuel cell cars still need lithium batteries and more raw minerals, mining etc that burning hydrogen in an ICE doesn't need. I get the inefficiency vs fuel cell but if we had a lot more nuclear this wouldn't matter and we have cars that are much simpler than even the current ICE cars with all their emissions control systems.
@@o00scorpion00o The reality is you'd need to get hydrogen down from $36/kg to less than $5/kg for H2 ICE to go anywhere. That requires getting electricity to less than 3¢/kWh. Since nuclear plants generally cost about 6¢/kWh to produce electricity, let alone sell it for a profit, nuclear isn't likely going to solve any issues no matter how many get built. Maybe if we run out of crude and the price skyrockets so that gasoline is over $10/gal, that might change things. But in the meantime, more and more people love the quietness of BEVs and can't believe they used to like driving ICE cars.
@@scottkolaya2110 I drove BEV for 10 years, I live in Ireland so it's a Small Island, it was a novelty in the beginning but the issues remain, long charge times and much less range despite my last EV being an 82 Kwh id3 with 77 Kwh usable. The car weighted 2 tonne for a small hatch which was ridiculous, it dulled the driving experience something awful. Getting rid of EV with depreciation and dealers not wanting EV as trade in is a real hassle so I gave it back to the finance company. Not into all this tech , screens and all other nonsense. Now I drive a petrol manual car with minimal tech and I love it, I missed the engagement of driving a manual ICE and the much better handling of a much lighter car. There are many people with no home charging and won't be willing to spend endless hrs at public charging. I think you underestimate the energy Nuclear energy can provide and it can produce a lot of clean electricity and hydrogen. There is really no other alternative to liquid fuels, BEV will never replace liquid fuels and it will never be environmentally friendly to produce batteries.
Some technology may log behind but behind the scenes it been work on to improve and refine it to make it becomes more common and easy to dealt with gradually over time somethings take a little time longer than some but when it take off action.
Winter driving would be a nightmare. Icy roads BECAUSE of the cars. Then what? We add more chemicals to the roads? That can't be good for the environment, your car, or wallet.
I'm sure that's solvable. How much water is even produced? You're already getting roads salted and sanded in winter, a little more water isn't going to make a difference
Where i live therebis talk of offshore windturbines been used in conjunction with all the sea water to make the hydrogen. Its perfect for offloading onto tankers as much offshore oil is at the moment. Its one option i heard for getting greener fuel.
Hydrogen and oxygen would be an endless source of energy if we succeed in finding bacteria to separate. Imagine all the electric power plants we have to build and the grid update for all the SUV.
But the question is "Why?!" Why use hydrogen when you already have BEVs? It's like taking the very longer route in going from point A to point B just because you can! Let's take into consideration the best case scenario for hydrogen: it's produced by electrolysis of water using electricity from solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear sources i.e. it's 🟢 hydrogen. Even though it's a carbon neutral process, you have to consume energy just to make energy which is non-sensical. This energy can simply be sent into the grid and it can power EVs at homes or at EV charging stations just like that! Instead, we have to purify water to electrolyse it and build a whole new bunch of different infrastructures like electrolysers, supply chains, safety systems, dispensing stations etc. All this costs a lot of time and money to build and maintain, something that is not true for BEVs since we already have a grid in place which is 70% of the job done! Then imagine the inferno that would be caused if there was a leak. Petrol at least needs a flame to ignite, hydrogen does so just by coming in contact with the oxygen of air! Thus hydrogen is more hazardous than fossil fuels. And finally, researchers have said that large scale leaks of hydrogen can also potentially act as a greenhouse gas. So you would have to be total muppets to use hydrogen instead of electricity for EVs.
I think if the governments should put more money into hydrogen power vehicles, they would be a better option. The thing is with EVs is charging especially in Australia where we have to drive huge distances to get anywhere. 10 hrs to get a full charge after a few hundred kms is ridiculous. Let alone having a car that literally has no sound is weird. It would be better if they had more HP as well.
So everybody keeps saying that “there’s a chance it will be viable” but I can never find an explanation how they’ll do that. The efficiency of hydrogen power and the fact you have to have just as many parts in the car as an ICE (if not more) makes EVs look like the winner long term
Liquid hydrogen is dead on arrival. Why? It turns to a gas when it warms above 423 degree F below zero. The tank to hold super cooled liquid hydrogen must 100% fool proof in terms of leaks and in terms of surviving an accident. Why is this important? A pin point leak in a liquid hydrogen tank will create an explosion so great that there won't be a piece of the car or it's passengers left that is larger than the size of a thimble. It will take only one accident to occur like this and the hydrogen powered car idea will come to a screeching halt. Sorry...it's true!
Honestly from what i'm hearing is that right now Hydrogen is highly impractical, but if we'd put the same amount of effort into researching Hydrogen cars that we do purely electrical ones then we could be utilizing the technology before we know it
My question is why does the hydrogen need to be in a liquid form? Could we not make an engine that can run off of hydrogen gas? Then all you'd need is water and a safe way to split the hydrogen from the oxygen. Hell, it could have a reclaim system for the exhaust (which is just water, the system would take the water from buring the hydrogen and feed it back into the water tank) That being said, there's probably either some kinda problem with this idea that doesnt have a solution or big corporate companys have explored this idea and came to the conclusion that pumping straight liquid hydrogen into a car rather than the idea I have at the top of the comment makes way more money for them
The production and cost of the fuel cell including while the losing 60% efficiency I see as a problem and need to be solved before i ever invest in a hydrogen car. Sticking with hybrid or EV until it’s addressed but is promising.
Only if hydrogen will be very cheap , but even then it's just ev with extra steps , you trrade battery with the whole compressed hydrogen and fuel cell system , I don't see it to be practical in smaller vehicles
If millions of vehicles were burning Hydrogen and creating only water, I presume this water goes somewhere! and is ejected outside of all of these vehicles creating wet slippery roads, condensation, and then clouds which will then cause a change in the atmosphere, resulting in rain, floods, and storms, it doesn't seem a good idea to me.
A drawback that first came to me is if you had 1000s of these in a cold environment, would they expell large amounts of water on the road requiring salt trucks to be continuously dumping on the highway.
My guess is that your country doesn't get these cars 😂 You're better off burning fossil fuels as that causes climate change and perhaps your country will become a tropical climate, at which point you can confidently buy a hydrogen car and feel all warm and fuzzy that you're caring for the Earth.
For the cold season they could create a onboard reservoir that can be drained at home instead of on the road? not sure how much water is created over a given period of time, say, 1 hour of driving.
@maikelvantures3660 You are a genius. You should get a patent before someone else figures out that water is 2 part hydrogen. @BeyondFuel - please do not waste your time responding to these comments.
@@maikelvantures3660- As @BeyondFuel replied "Did they? Which one?" You wrote "a source thats from mother nature!" ... so please explain what you heard/read.
Not soon! H2 produced from electricity thats already 30% electricity lost. Than, fuel cell efficiency is at least 20% less than electric motor. So you lost already 50% electricity which can be used in EV. On the top of that fuel-cell car needs to vent H2 at all time when packed in the garage with temp above -250C ( thats everywhere on Earth). Than building fueling station and building car itself is 10 or 2 times more expensive than EV, accordingly. NONSENSE idea for passenger vehicles. Ships, big trucks - perhaps.
It would be nice for it to become adopted. It's too early to opt it out right now but who knows in the future people will just need to pour in water and produce it at home
There are kits now to do that now. They use electrolysis to make the H2 and have compressors to pump it up to the required pressure. Unfortunately, they are very expensive because of the rare materials, but even if the electrolyzer was free, it still would be 4x more expensive to drive per mile than just putting that same electricity straight into a BEV and no water needed.
Why can hydrogen vehicle have a switchable tank that could be switched at a refuelling station? That would reduce the time spent at refuelling stations.
The thing with technology is it always advances. I remember when the idea of a shoe phone was absolutely outrageous, I wonder if they will ever crack that one?
Hydrogen fuel is a new idea for public transportation just live EV a few generations back. Give it time and better ideas and technology could make it a viable alternative.
No not directly. It uses hydrogen gas (H2) as its primary fuel source. Water is a byproduct of the hydrogen-oxygen reaction and is released as harmless water vapor through the vehicle's tailpipe :)
I heard them say it's more costly to produce H2 than Gasoline has anyone seen what crude oil looks like? they have to boil it cool it reboil it several times before it becomes gasoline or diesel, no to mention drilling for it, pumping it out of the ground, & transporting it on the oceans where as H2 is made from water & 2/3's of our planet is covered in water & DC current passed thru water creates it somehow I'm not seeing the drawbacks
So is the electrical grid. If everyone were to be driving electric cars, the power grid Wouldn't be able to keep up. More than 80% of our power grade is powered by natural gas and coal.
@weeraphanjunsangtong6791 So hydrogen is cheaper but you have to drive 20 miles to the nearest hydrogen fill station! Hydrogen will never become a viable option as the "delivery infrastructure" will never be built.
@@malcolmblack717that's worth EVERYTHING that starts. Electric WASN'T EVERYWHERE when it came out and those in power who profit I'm electric cars push on the masses the climate change green agenda to make us obliged pay for them to make money with their batteries windmills and all. All false and big lie🤑🤑🤑 That's why they push for electric cars. That's why they could put faster those crap electric things everywhere faster. While they dont do the same for hydrogen cause there they don't profit but people do. THEY who control the masses don't like that of course. That would cut their power and🤑🤑🤑🤑
With lithium or other batteries isn’t there an issue with what to do with them after they’ve outlasted their usefulness. Or, in other words, when the batteries need to be replaced?
Yesh thid certainly is the future . When enough refinement and demand th bcost wnd edficiency is making the fuel will go down . This surely beats both oil and electric .sources. orc this will also have a huge effect on geo politics . As oil rich nations wont have the same control they have on the worlds economy anymore.
What about leakage? The SLS rocket uses liquid hydrogen to power the rocket and it has leaking problems. Hydrogen is a small atom. Very difficult to seal.
Hydrogen is the fuel of the future as it can be burned just as gasoline is burned in an internal combustion engine thus no need for a hydrogen fuel cell as an ICE engine doesn't care where it gets it's hydrogen from. Right now new technologies have the electrolysis process up to 98% efficient for the production of hydrogen from water and just like EV's have home charging so too can hydrogen giving the owner true freedom to travel within the limits of the vehicles range just like an EV vehicle does. That's right produce all the hydrogen you need right in the comfort of your own home. If done correctly hydrogen ICE engines will actually clean the air as they are operated thus are better for the environment than EV's. Then there's the high cost of replacing a battery and the fact that there simply isn't enough of those rare materials to go around in trying to replace over 1.3 billion vehicles on the roadways world wide. I bet the first Tesla owner to need to have their battery replaced found out the hard way that all that they saved in fuel cost should have been saved to buy a replacement battery at a cost of roughly $23k USD.
![⭐️( ลอยกระทง 2024 ) Ver. แดนซ์ Remix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rMWOLhgXUHc/mqdefault.jpg)
💥Part 2 💥
👉How Does A Hydrogen Car Work | Parts & Functions - th-cam.com/video/p5BYBSk_MQk/w-d-xo.html
@@BeyondFuel 3 elements say 1
By living and y haviiuboiuwerdsYthakijloiunhinhaweadsewadrewerdsagi utyhfdsao jonh
so, how does a hydrogen car work?
Exactly 😂😂😂 probably this was made by Elon 😹😹
@@cillecal It was made by those Upwork dudes from Pakistan as a faceless chanel for money making :)
Thanks for your feedback. I have created a new video which is more related to the function of the technology in hydrogen vehicles -> th-cam.com/video/p5BYBSk_MQk/w-d-xo.html
He just explained it. 🙄
@@johnnybegood7725 Not quite. No.
The water powered car has already been invented, they just buried the invention and killed the inventor
No such thing. You're talking about a classic scam.
@@logitech4873 nonsense 😄
@@101ST-AIRBORNE The water powered car (which was never demonstrated) is indeed nonsense. Do you want the full explanation for why?
@@logitech4873 it was never demonstrated because they killed the inventor and showed you a fake car
@@101ST-AIRBORNE So how do you know it exists if it was never shown?
In the year 2000 the thought of a electric car that could be performance and travel more than 100 miles was laughed at as a fairy tale. Now no one is laughing. Hydrogen is NEW and the technology is developing fast along with all the nay sayers saying this won't work. Hydrogen cars fuel in a few minutes. Teslas .. almost an hour. I much rather be driving.
’m here to tell you that that is not Gods revelation, obviously you have been mislead , I go by
What the bible teaches and the bible does not teach of hell fire ,
velation 16:14,16 - Satan is now "MISLEADING the entire inhabited earth". Jesus called him the "god of this world",(2 Cor. 4:4; 1 John 5:19) Demonic spirits manipulate people (like puppets) and even put on an angelic appearance or voice. Satan is called the "angel of light".
nothing all government and all authority and power.e 25 For he must rule as king until God has put all enemies under his feet.f 26 And the last enemy, death, is to be brought to nothing.g 27 For God “subjected all things under his feet.”h But when he says that ‘all things have been subjected,’i it is evident that this does not include the One who subjected all things to him.j 28 But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him,k that God may be all things to everyone.l
So don’t you get it
Jesus is going to hand back the kingdom to God
So fast accel and fast charging like gas and like electric???
@@donwilson6965 Have I not already written you, Imparting advice and knowledge,
You kept neglecting all my advice And rejecting my reproof,
They refused my advice; They disrespected all my reproof.
I possess good advice and practical wisdom; Understanding and power are mine.
The way of the fool is right in his own eyes, But the wise one accepts advice.
Presumptuousness leads only to strife, But wisdom belongs to those who seek advice.
test those
That say I lie
I have loved you
Everytime I watch more videos about these electric and hydrogen cars, I become more convinced that gas and diesel cars are absolutely the BEST!!!!
Hey that's what people said in 1868 lol ,"horse carriage is better and eco friendly and more saver"
Well well well.. this comment aged like milk, hydrogen cars are proven to be more efficient, and powerful than gasoline cars
Hydrogen boleh di proses dihasilkan untuk menjadikan gas pada enjin tersebut. Berbanding bahan api lain seperti NGV, petrol, disel mahupun nitrogen gas untuk kegunaan sesebuah enjin perlu didapatkan dari luar atau stesen stesen tertentu.
Untuk hydrogen, gas boleh dihasilkan dengan adanya air, campuran bahan kimia dan elektrik yang boleh didapati pada enjin tersebut selain stesen pump gas hydrogen yang di khususkan sepertimana stesen pump minyak yang lain.
This is clearly funded by the oil gas companies 😂 you literally fill up with a garden hose the drive away the only exhaust is water vapor 😂😂 this video suggests that it’s going too be toxic too our environment
Great video! I love how you broke down the workings of hydrogen cars in such an easy-to-understand way. The potential of hydrogen fuel cells is fascinating, and I can't wait to see how the technology evolves. Keep up the amazing work 😉
See also this video. It provides a more detailed breakdown of how hydrogen cars work in terms of their parts and functions -> th-cam.com/video/p5BYBSk_MQk/w-d-xo.html
I think technology will advance and hydrogen powered vehicles will become practical and economically viable. And the technology and the process for producing hydrogen will be truly green. Even the technology for producing lithium ion batteries isn't green either .
Yes that's right. Thank you
Same argument for producing lithium ion batteries, it's the infrastructure that's not green not that actual production of the batteries
Are you sure?! As batteries can be recycled while hydrogen fuel cells uses resources and used up a lot of energy just to produce hydrogen 😂
It will only be an option if it can be made “economically viable”. Ask Nikola Tesla.
This is the future not crappy electric cars.
Ironic you call electric cars crappy….. they’re literally hybrid ‘hydrogen-electric’. Hydrogen gas supplies the electrical potential to power an electric motor to drive the wheels. So what’s crappy about electric? Do you mean battery electric cars?
Hydrogen is the most abundant atom in the universe for a reason!
Is the reason that it is the simplest atom out there?
If the demand is there, the price will go down. Remember twenty years ago a 50 inch LCD HDTV cost 50k USD and now it is barely $500.
Before gas engine, you had steam engine. Hydrogen is hard and expensive to harvest (so was gas and oil) but like any other problems, I’m confident we will solve it. Already, Toyota has something promising. I can foresee Hydrogen powered vehicle within the next ten years.
I agree. This attitude has always brought us further. Science makes it possible
The problem is gasoline is a readily available source of energy. You just have to drill it out. But free hydrogen molecule isn't available in large quantities naturally. You actually have to spend energy to separate it from compounds. It'll get expensive once scaled. You can say the same thing for EV batteries, that we have to charge ourselves, but charging efficiency for Li-ion batteries is around 90%. Hydrogen extraction efficiency ranges from 30-40% if you're dissociating water.
However, since Hydrogen is so light compared to Li-ion batteries, I think it makes up for its inefficient extraction because it costs less fuel to carry hydrogen than heavy Li-ion batteries.
But the question is "Why?!" Why use hydrogen when you already have BEVs? It's like taking the very longer route in going from point A to point B just because you can!
Let's take into consideration the best case scenario for hydrogen: it's produced by electrolysis of water using electricity from solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear sources i.e. it's 🟢 hydrogen. Even though it's a carbon neutral process, you have to consume energy just to make energy which is non-sensical. This energy can simply be sent into the grid and it can power EVs at homes or at EV charging stations just like that! Instead, we have to purify water to electrolyse it and build a whole new bunch of different infrastructures like electrolysers, supply chains, safety systems, dispensing stations etc. All this costs a lot of time and money to build and maintain, something that is not true for BEVs since we already have a grid in place which is 70% of the job done! Then imagine the inferno that would be caused if there was a leak. Petrol at least needs a flame to ignite, hydrogen does so just by coming in contact with the oxygen of air! Thus hydrogen is more hazardous than fossil fuels. And finally, researchers have said that large scale leaks of hydrogen can also potentially act as a greenhouse gas.
So you would have to be total muppets to use hydrogen instead of electricity for EVs.
@@exterminator4808 Why have spotify when we already had CD's?
@@Fin_Gerbutsdid you came up with it on your own ? , if yes then think better
The membrane or the fuelcell stacks that exchanges hydrogen to electrical energy are troublesome and must be replaced with other components once a year or every 6 months. The membrane is like what you usually see in the RO water filter, except larger depending on the design it can be a rectangle or cylinder with built in heat exchange or cooler.
It's very expensive, $10,000 or more to replace it a long with other components.
The car works like a hybrid car, battery and all. The coolant to cool the membrane or the fuelcell is another issue to worry about.The membrane only lasts about 6 months to a year, depending on how the car is used. If you park the car for a very long time like a month or so, the system will clog up. Then the membrane and cooling components have to be replaced before you can use the car. The car has to be towed into the shop autorized dealer.
So far, there are NO mechanics at the dealer that can work on the cars, due to its complicated system. You must wait for a trained scientist mechanic from Toyota Japan to fly in for your service on an electrical problem.
It's good source of energy for vehicles...let's pursue...
Ok . I am going to research this
You didn't mentioned the amount of water required to product 1 kg of green hydrogen.
You didn't mentioned that large amount of electricity is needed to product green hydrogen.
The author is so stupid to understand that as he didnt know how it will impact the use of our water resources 🤷♂️ which is it is better to deplete the lithium battery resources than our water supplies... He didnt even know how much energy/electricity it would need just to produce liquid hydrogen 🤦♂️
Wow hydrogen energy very good not pollution very very natural fuel amazing work thank you God thank you so much❤❤❤❤
30 seconds to refuel a hydrogen powered vehicle is a giant leap in front of even the fastest charging EV. It is a no brainer.
Everything except - how does a hydrogen car work 😄😄😄
Love how there's a ExxonMobil commercial promoting Gas to hydrogen car video 😂
That’s a wrong video title, can you change it?
Very concise video and well done, but at 1:56 is a bad graphic. You're showing an ICE H2 engine, not a fuel cell. ICE H2 engines require more like 10+ times the energy as BEVs. And regarding 3 times for fuel cells, that's best case at the moment where as the H2 is delivered via pipeline. If you have to truck it compressed, or worse liquefy it, it's more like 4 times the energy per mile. It's an OK technology to fit where other technologies can't meet the specific requirements.
Thanks for your feedback and further clarification :)
If you had to come up with a way to receive £1 of a million people what would be the best way to
Yeah but ICE gives people real cars not some appliance like experience with electric drive + Fuel cell cars still need lithium batteries and more raw minerals, mining etc that burning hydrogen in an ICE doesn't need.
I get the inefficiency vs fuel cell but if we had a lot more nuclear this wouldn't matter and we have cars that are much simpler than even the current ICE cars with all their emissions control systems.
@@o00scorpion00o The reality is you'd need to get hydrogen down from $36/kg to less than $5/kg for H2 ICE to go anywhere. That requires getting electricity to less than 3¢/kWh. Since nuclear plants generally cost about 6¢/kWh to produce electricity, let alone sell it for a profit, nuclear isn't likely going to solve any issues no matter how many get built. Maybe if we run out of crude and the price skyrockets so that gasoline is over $10/gal, that might change things. But in the meantime, more and more people love the quietness of BEVs and can't believe they used to like driving ICE cars.
@@scottkolaya2110 I drove BEV for 10 years, I live in Ireland so it's a Small Island, it was a novelty in the beginning but the issues remain, long charge times and much less range despite my last EV being an 82 Kwh id3 with 77 Kwh usable.
The car weighted 2 tonne for a small hatch which was ridiculous, it dulled the driving experience something awful. Getting rid of EV with depreciation and dealers not wanting EV as trade in is a real hassle so I gave it back to the finance company. Not into all this tech , screens and all other nonsense.
Now I drive a petrol manual car with minimal tech and I love it, I missed the engagement of driving a manual ICE and the much better handling of a much lighter car.
There are many people with no home charging and won't be willing to spend endless hrs at public charging.
I think you underestimate the energy Nuclear energy can provide and it can produce a lot of clean electricity and hydrogen.
There is really no other alternative to liquid fuels, BEV will never replace liquid fuels and it will never be environmentally friendly to produce batteries.
Some technology may log behind but behind the scenes it been work on to improve and refine it to make it becomes more common and easy to dealt with gradually over time somethings take a little time longer than some but when it take off action.
Winter driving would be a nightmare. Icy roads BECAUSE of the cars. Then what? We add more chemicals to the roads? That can't be good for the environment, your car, or wallet.
Roads are already icy in winter where I live.
There could be some kind of container that fills up with the water coming out of the car. This container can then be emptied anywhere 😊
I'm sure that's solvable. How much water is even produced? You're already getting roads salted and sanded in winter, a little more water isn't going to make a difference
Where i live therebis talk of offshore windturbines been used in conjunction with all the sea water to make the hydrogen. Its perfect for offloading onto tankers as much offshore oil is at the moment.
Its one option i heard for getting greener fuel.
Turbo charged
I hope so, because I think overall it will be way less polluting than the present EV cars.
Hydrogen and oxygen would be an endless source of energy if we succeed in finding bacteria to separate.
Imagine all the electric power plants we have to build and the grid update for all the SUV.
But the question is "Why?!" Why use hydrogen when you already have BEVs? It's like taking the very longer route in going from point A to point B just because you can!
Let's take into consideration the best case scenario for hydrogen: it's produced by electrolysis of water using electricity from solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear sources i.e. it's 🟢 hydrogen. Even though it's a carbon neutral process, you have to consume energy just to make energy which is non-sensical. This energy can simply be sent into the grid and it can power EVs at homes or at EV charging stations just like that! Instead, we have to purify water to electrolyse it and build a whole new bunch of different infrastructures like electrolysers, supply chains, safety systems, dispensing stations etc. All this costs a lot of time and money to build and maintain, something that is not true for BEVs since we already have a grid in place which is 70% of the job done! Then imagine the inferno that would be caused if there was a leak. Petrol at least needs a flame to ignite, hydrogen does so just by coming in contact with the oxygen of air! Thus hydrogen is more hazardous than fossil fuels. And finally, researchers have said that large scale leaks of hydrogen can also potentially act as a greenhouse gas.
So you would have to be total muppets to use hydrogen instead of electricity for EVs.
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
I think if the governments should put more money into hydrogen power vehicles, they would be a better option. The thing is with EVs is charging especially in Australia where we have to drive huge distances to get anywhere. 10 hrs to get a full charge after a few hundred kms is ridiculous. Let alone having a car that literally has no sound is weird. It would be better if they had more HP as well.
So everybody keeps saying that “there’s a chance it will be viable” but I can never find an explanation how they’ll do that. The efficiency of hydrogen power and the fact you have to have just as many parts in the car as an ICE (if not more) makes EVs look like the winner long term
The hydrogen power will be via Fuel Cell technology (FCV) not via ICE. However, hydrogen will never be viable due to "delivery infrastructure".
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
why dont we put tap water in it
Liquid hydrogen is dead on arrival. Why? It turns to a gas when it warms above 423 degree F below zero. The tank to hold super cooled liquid hydrogen must 100% fool proof in terms of leaks and in terms of surviving an accident. Why is this important? A pin point leak in a liquid hydrogen tank will create an explosion so great that there won't be a piece of the car or it's passengers left that is larger than the size of a thimble. It will take only one accident to occur like this and the hydrogen powered car idea will come to a screeching halt. Sorry...it's true!
Hydrogen it's future
Honestly from what i'm hearing is that right now Hydrogen is highly impractical, but if we'd put the same amount of effort into researching Hydrogen cars that we do purely electrical ones then we could be utilizing the technology before we know it
Toyota is trying, but whether it will succeed is a mystery.
This was marketing , no explanation on an hydrogen engine working
I'm waiting when car run on purely Oxygen Energy ⚡ 😂😅
Or just with water! ;)
My question is why does the hydrogen need to be in a liquid form? Could we not make an engine that can run off of hydrogen gas? Then all you'd need is water and a safe way to split the hydrogen from the oxygen. Hell, it could have a reclaim system for the exhaust (which is just water, the system would take the water from buring the hydrogen and feed it back into the water tank)
That being said, there's probably either some kinda problem with this idea that doesnt have a solution or big corporate companys have explored this idea and came to the conclusion that pumping straight liquid hydrogen into a car rather than the idea I have at the top of the comment makes way more money for them
i hope it does catch on, it seems much better than electric cars.
All I was told in this video that it was expensive to make hydrogen and that was it. Not how a hydrogen car works lol.
Yes - Keep on watching part 2. Here its explained in detail. th-cam.com/video/OmQeDtvsvhw/w-d-xo.html
hydrogen becomes a choice for car future
The production and cost of the fuel cell including while the losing 60% efficiency I see as a problem and need to be solved before i ever invest in a hydrogen car. Sticking with hybrid or EV until it’s addressed but is promising.
Only if hydrogen will be very cheap , but even then it's just ev with extra steps , you trrade battery with the whole compressed hydrogen and fuel cell system , I don't see it to be practical in smaller vehicles
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
We indians are going to develop hydrogen vehicles, with large scale solar investment 🎉
If millions of vehicles were burning Hydrogen and creating only water, I presume this water goes somewhere! and is ejected outside of all of these vehicles creating wet slippery roads, condensation, and then clouds which will then cause a change in the atmosphere, resulting in rain, floods, and storms, it doesn't seem a good idea to me.
A drawback that first came to me is if you had 1000s of these in a cold environment, would they expell large amounts of water on the road requiring salt trucks to be continuously dumping on the highway.
So what happens when it’s raining?
@@il798liOld my thoughts to that is if it's raining it's above freezing so the road wouldn't have to be salted.
.
My guess is that your country doesn't get these cars 😂 You're better off burning fossil fuels as that causes climate change and perhaps your country will become a tropical climate, at which point you can confidently buy a hydrogen car and feel all warm and fuzzy that you're caring for the Earth.
For the cold season they could create a onboard reservoir that can be drained at home instead of on the road? not sure how much water is created over a given period of time, say, 1 hour of driving.
No need to travel Mars.We make Earth one! " Elon
Didnt they already found a source thats from mother nature!? That keeps on flowing.
Did they? Which one?
@maikelvantures3660 You are a genius. You should get a patent before someone else figures out that water is 2 part hydrogen.
@BeyondFuel - please do not waste your time responding to these comments.
@@malcolmblack717 it was a question but okay!!!!
@@maikelvantures3660- As @BeyondFuel replied "Did they? Which one?" You wrote "a source thats from mother nature!" ... so please explain what you heard/read.
This video is meant to confuse: upfront cost is not a problem for a highly viable technology
Thanks 😊👍 Sir.
So wait, can't you just use water bottle ?
The whole world can’t afford hydrogen at moment so maybe not 😊
How are the military applications for hydrogen as an alternative?
Not soon! H2 produced from electricity thats already 30% electricity lost. Than, fuel cell efficiency is at least 20% less than electric motor. So you lost already 50% electricity which can be used in EV. On the top of that fuel-cell car needs to vent H2 at all time when packed in the garage with temp above -250C ( thats everywhere on Earth). Than building fueling station and building car itself is 10 or 2 times more expensive than EV, accordingly. NONSENSE idea for passenger vehicles. Ships, big trucks - perhaps.
Who gonna repair that drive train when it BREAKS! $$$$$$
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
It would be nice for it to become adopted. It's too early to opt it out right now but who knows in the future people will just need to pour in water and produce it at home
There are kits now to do that now. They use electrolysis to make the H2 and have compressors to pump it up to the required pressure. Unfortunately, they are very expensive because of the rare materials, but even if the electrolyzer was free, it still would be 4x more expensive to drive per mile than just putting that same electricity straight into a BEV and no water needed.
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
Change 'works' to 'work' 😉👍
Many thanks 😅👍
👌
Why can hydrogen vehicle have a switchable tank that could be switched at a refuelling station? That would reduce the time spent at refuelling stations.
This it's the future...
The thing with technology is it always advances. I remember when the idea of a shoe phone was absolutely outrageous, I wonder if they will ever crack that one?
Never gonna work, long live gasoline! Hahaha 😂
If we have traffic in town, we will flood!!!
Hopefully everyone can swim ;D
How do they keep the hydrogen liquid once it’s in the car. It’s only liquid when super chilled
They don't. It is stored as a compressed gas at 700 bar. No cooling needed.
Blue has never heard of water or H2O
Hydrogen fuel is a new idea for public transportation just live EV a few generations back. Give it time and better ideas and technology could make it a viable alternative.
Well that taught me nothing and didn't answer the question set in the description.
Therefore i have uploaded a second video with a more detailed view on the technics behind: th-cam.com/video/OmQeDtvsvhw/w-d-xo.html
Thx better
No thanks ill stay a petrolhead .
In hydrogen cars chemical energy converted to electrical energy which is used in cars
Still don't know how a hydrogen car works!
Watch this one. Here its explaned in detail :) th-cam.com/video/OmQeDtvsvhw/w-d-xo.html
But what we pump the co2 back in the ground like some ethanol plants are doing i hydrogen being a vible renewble resource
All I want is global cooling
Looks good now but what happens when it takes a 💩? What are the cost going to be and where are you gonna get it fixed at?
how is electrolysis expensive ?
Sooo, is it a car that runs on water???
No not directly. It uses hydrogen gas (H2) as its primary fuel source. Water is a byproduct of the hydrogen-oxygen reaction and is released as harmless water vapor through the vehicle's tailpipe :)
Electric cars is the way to go but we have to convert from DC to AC RIP Nikola Tesla 💯 , if you know you know…
is it bad pyrolisis fule ? like bio disel and bio gasoline ?
A video about fuel, and he spelt fuel wrong.
I heard them say it's more costly to produce H2 than Gasoline has anyone seen what crude oil looks like? they have to boil it cool it reboil it several times before it becomes gasoline or diesel, no to mention drilling for it, pumping it out of the ground, & transporting it on the oceans where as H2 is made from water & 2/3's of our planet is covered in water & DC current passed thru water creates it somehow I'm not seeing the drawbacks
So is the electrical grid. If everyone were to be driving electric cars, the power grid Wouldn't be able to keep up. More than 80% of our power grade is powered by natural gas and coal.
Its....seems...like...thunder...in...the...Sky....the...mass..of..atom,...turn...to...elektricity..
No I think the fuel cell has been overtaken by the fully battery electric vehicle and infrastructure
Yes hydrogen is better that electric car etc, hydrogen cars etc for the future
The choice to choose is up to the price of hydrogen compare with gas.
Unfortunately, hydrogen is still quite expensive. This will change with time.
@weeraphanjunsangtong6791 So hydrogen is cheaper but you have to drive 20 miles to the nearest hydrogen fill station! Hydrogen will never become a viable option as the "delivery infrastructure" will never be built.
@@malcolmblack717that's worth EVERYTHING that starts. Electric WASN'T EVERYWHERE when it came out and those in power who profit I'm electric cars push on the masses the climate change green agenda to make us obliged pay for them to make money with their batteries windmills and all. All false and big lie🤑🤑🤑 That's why they push for electric cars. That's why they could put faster those crap electric things everywhere faster. While they dont do the same for hydrogen cause there they don't profit but people do. THEY who control the masses don't like that of course. That would cut their power and🤑🤑🤑🤑
3:33 when can we expext to see powerstations going over to hydrogen?
You forgot to mention the relative costs of production. Pretty sure the lithium-ion batteries are asinine.
With lithium or other batteries isn’t there an issue with what to do with them after they’ve outlasted their usefulness. Or, in other words, when the batteries need to be replaced?
He’s worried about green gas emissions from hydrogen lol 😂 yes battery cars are the worse mining for the minerals is absolute terrible
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
What happens if I put salt Water intoned Waterville
There is natural hydrogen. Search mali natural hydrogen.
There are companies starting to find them now.
Pihak ning ndi tempat normal mencari pengakuan ketika menciptakan hal.
Yesh thid certainly is the future .
When enough refinement and demand th bcost wnd edficiency is making the fuel will go down .
This surely beats both oil and electric .sources. orc this will also have a huge effect on geo politics . As oil rich nations wont have the same control they have on the worlds economy anymore.
Thanks BP (Beyond Petroleum) for you crappy video. Showing nothing about future hydrogen vehicles. And simply gas lighting the technology. Shame
Sak ngetik yo jepang. Enter berita yo jepang. Tapi yo mboh
and then the wheels turn...
Isn’t hydrogen is more explosive??
Works?
Sounds to me it's nowhere close to being a viable solution. The tech is nowhere near where it needs to be in order to be competitive in the market.
What about leakage? The SLS rocket uses liquid hydrogen to power the rocket and it has leaking problems. Hydrogen is a small atom. Very difficult to seal.
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
Oil industry own congress and senate also purchase the Supreme Court so nothing will happen until we ran out of oil
What a bulls..t! I want to know how the hydrogen vehicle works! The tile is very misleading as after watching this I still don't know.
Just watch my latest video. There you will find satisfaction ✨️
th-cam.com/video/76hDyQQXztI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MGsq6Ai4hA0a60Ix
Hydrogen is the fuel of the future as it can be burned just as gasoline is burned in an internal combustion engine thus no need for a hydrogen fuel cell as an ICE engine doesn't care where it gets it's hydrogen from. Right now new technologies have the electrolysis process up to 98% efficient for the production of hydrogen from water and just like EV's have home charging so too can hydrogen giving the owner true freedom to travel within the limits of the vehicles range just like an EV vehicle does. That's right produce all the hydrogen you need right in the comfort of your own home.
If done correctly hydrogen ICE engines will actually clean the air as they are operated thus are better for the environment than EV's. Then there's the high cost of replacing a battery and the fact that there simply isn't enough of those rare materials to go around in trying to replace over 1.3 billion vehicles on the roadways world wide. I bet the first Tesla owner to need to have their battery replaced found out the hard way that all that they saved in fuel cost should have been saved to buy a replacement battery at a cost of roughly $23k USD.
Yes! the exchange of the battery also costs quite a bit. Thanks for your contribution.
And batteries aren't green as they make believe. (Those who profit say they are🤑🤑)