He's a prophet for predicting his death... really shitty prophet, all humans die so mohamed jalauddin the 601248753285042th is the shittiest prophet ever
@@Otto_Von_Beansmarck This piece addresses and debunks the claims made by Testify regarding Surah 69:46 of the Qur'an, which discusses the potential fate of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he were to fabricate any of Allah's revelations. Testify argues that there is a contradiction between this verse and the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death. Specifically, they claim that the verse implies a threat of death through the severing of the aorta, and since the Prophet did not die in this way, it suggests the Qur'an is inconsistent and Muhammad (peace be upon him) was a false prophet. First, it’s important to clarify the misinterpretation of the term "aorta" in Surah 69:46. Testify claims the verse speaks about the severing of the aorta, using the word "al-wateen." However, the Arabic word "al-wateen" in this verse is different from the word used in hadith literature, "al-abhar." "Al-wateen" refers to a vein in the heart, and if severed, it would cause death, while "al-abhar" refers to a vein running down from the head. Renowned Arabic dictionaries such as Taaj al-'Aroos and al-Qaamoos Al-Muheet clarify that the two terms are not synonymous, and "al-wateen" is specifically associated with death from a vein in the heart. Furthermore, the phrase "cut my aorta" was a common idiom in pre-Islamic and Islamic Arabic, symbolizing death, rather than a literal severing of the aorta. Several sources, including Imam az-Zamakhshari, confirm that this phrase was widely understood metaphorically in Arabic literature to mean death, not the literal cutting of a vein. The claim that the Prophet (peace be upon him) died due to the literal severing of the aorta, as predicted in Surah 69:46, is unfounded. The verse refers to a hypothetical situation where the Prophet (peace be upon him) would face immediate death if he fabricated any part of Allah’s revelation. It is not a description of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) actual death. The circumstances surrounding his death (poisoning and its prolonged effects) do not contradict the warning in the verse. Surah 69:46 is not a prophecy of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death, but rather a conditional statement about the consequences of altering or fabricating Allah’s revelations. The verse does not claim that the Prophet (peace be upon him) will die in a specific manner, but rather that if he were to ascribe falsehoods to Allah, he would face swift punishment. Testify’s claim about the Jewish lady’s criteria for prophethood is flawed. Her views are irrelevant to Islamic beliefs. Muslims follow the Qur'an, which allows for the possibility of a prophet’s death without compromising their prophethood (3:144). Moreover, prophets have been killed by Jews in the past, as stated in both the Qur'an (5:70) and the Bible. The Jewish lady contradicts her own scriptures, where prophets like Zechariah (2 Chronicles 24:20-22) and others during Elijah’s time were killed. Furthermore, multiple narrations suggest that the Prophet passed her test, meaning Testify’s critique is based on a flawed premise. Testify argues that Bishr’s faith in Muhammad led to his death, implying that the Prophet’s actions were somehow to blame. However, it was never promised that the Prophet (peace be upon him) would protect his followers from harm in every situation. Bishr’s decision to continue eating was based on his own assumption, not a directive from the Prophet. Additionally, the Prophet (peace be upon him) was not omniscient, and this does not undermine his prophethood. Testify’s critique is irrelevant when compared to similar situations in Christian scripture. Testify also misinterprets the Prophet’s statement "Allah would never allow it." The Prophet was not implying that the poison would never affect him, but rather that the attempt to kill him would not succeed at that moment. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was still fulfilling his mission of conveying the message of Islam, and his death would not occur before this. The context suggests that the Jewish woman’s plan to kill him was unsuccessful at that moment because Allah’s protection was still in place. The timing of his death was part of Allah’s divine plan, and questioning it is to challenge God’s wisdom. Testify’s questions about why the lamb didn’t speak earlier are based on a misunderstanding of divine will. The Prophet (peace be upon him) receiving a revelation through the lamb is part of God's plan, and questioning the timing of this is a futile attempt to challenge divine wisdom. The fact that the Prophet received revelation when needed, rather than immediately, aligns with God’s greater plan, which we may not always fully comprehend. Testify’s statement that Muhammad provoked hatred against Jews and oppressed women is historically inaccurate. The Prophet (peace be upon him) advocated for justice and fairness, and his actions and teachings regarding women were progressive for their time. The Prophet’s relationship with Jews was complex, and while there were conflicts, this does not equate to a history of provoking hatred. Furthermore, the claim that Muhammad oppressed women is a misrepresentation of Islamic teachings, which emphasized the protection and dignity of women. Testify’s claim that Allah showed favoritism by protecting Jesus and not Muhammad is based on a false comparison. The Qur’an and other scriptures acknowledge that prophets may face trials, and their deaths occur as part of God’s plan. The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) died from the poison does not diminish his status or the validity of his message. The notion of "favoritism" is irrelevant because each prophet’s journey was determined by divine wisdom, and we should not judge God’s actions based on human reasoning. In conclusion, Testify’s claims are addressed and refuted by clarifying misinterpretations of the Arabic language, idiomatic expressions, and the lack of any direct connection between Surah 69:46 and the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death. The verse is a hypothetical statement about the consequences of fabricating Allah’s message, not a prophecy of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death.
I mean literally no one actually believed in him or his words until much much later after his death when the "ummah" was invading ans spread the words via a sword look at any historical islamic figures outside of faith they're all just blood thirty conquerors
Incredibly poetic that a lamb was what done him in (Jesus is the lamb), and God's message about his partner was clear. If you follow this man (his companion said he was suspicious but ate because he saw momo eat) you're going to die. God is truly the best of poets.
It is still happening. One of the strongest arguments against the typical "the previous texts are corrupted" is the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and who found them? A shepherd. In a cave no less.
@rosswalenciak3739 exactly, so it definitely seems weirdly translated. If not done with the intent to be secretive about anything (which of course they are)
@@yoeyyoey8937 Narrated `Aisha: The Prophet (ﷺ) in his ailment in which he died, used to say, "O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison." Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 You're welcome.
Sahih al-Bukhari 7018 By Allah, though I am Allah's Messenger, *I neither know what will happen to **_me,_** nor to **_you._* 💀 🕳️👨🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯☪️ (Context: What happens to a good Muslim after death ☠️)
There are a lot of things that is right in the Quran and how it made Islam false if Quran predicted the prophet death it's so stupid he is a human not like you
So many dilemmas with no sound theology whatsoever to reconcile it or explain it. How can anyone follow this without being intellectually dishonest with themselves?
They have to deceive themselves and others to defend the biggest lie.😢 Muslims will say that the Bible has been corrupt, I tell them which quranic verse says the Bible has been corrupt? They have to resort to saying the Bible has been corrupted because it contradicts the quran. For example: Noah's sons dying in the flood, Jesus not being crucified, Literally so many times God is called Father, but in Islam, we are Allah's slaves. Not even a niece or something! But just a slave.
@@AyEhm-ii2dpMost Protestant families won’t shun or disown a family member that apostatized. The worst might be evangelizing or having philosophical arguments.
I myself am a Christian, and I'd recommend reading it. Not just for rebuttals, but because it's genuinely an interesting, and hilarious, read. Same reason I advise other Christians to read other religious texts, they're interesting reads, and they help you gain a look on what people of that religion actually think.
@@Xman-j3p I have. KJV, NIV, Geneva, I've read the Bible in Hebrew and Greek, I have read the Bible multiple times in multiple ways. Just saying, read other religious books too.
Furthermore, the fact that God, in the Bible, gives people time to repent before judgement shows that God was gracious to Muhammad before proving he was a false prophet, by even utilizing his own false prophecies, by giving him time to repent, as well.
Reminds me of Ahmed Deedat who asked Allah to silence the liar and then not much later he had a stroke and became a vegetable who couldn't speak for 9 years.
@@SamGhost-ul3ot Jesus prophecied His death and resurrection for the remission of sins for the world not for a punishment of being a false prophet. John 2:19-21 19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? 21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
@@DynamicLights nope stop sugarcoating, God will not bless me accordin to christianity I’m cursed and doomed for eternal torture- Please accept the fact that god doesn’t like disbelievers like muslims accept it instead of sugarcoating thanks
It gets even worse when in the arabic version he doesn’t say he feels like it is being cut, he says that he LITERALLY feels it being cut. They changed the scripts when translating it to other languages.
As a Muslim myself, who have read Sahih Bukhari full, I felt confused when u said that Hadith, I checked 4428, OH WHAT DID I FIND, on my god who created me, it says nothing about aorta being cut or anything, but in hadith 5777, it does say about a Jewish women who gave prophet poisoned food, and in another book called sunan abu dawood hadith 4512, prophet told that he feels as if his aorta is being cut, and in the Tafsir (explanation) the word aorta is used as a metamorphical veiw… u can continue to spread false information… jahils nowadays..
@@COOlguy-ed5bqAllah made all people finger print for judgement day and rebirth purposes mention in quran sura kiyamat read it also made eye password and dna code and coccyx bone in tail
@@ClemTec dates are good for your digestion and help regulate blood sugar, this Hadith has nothing to do with any magical poison-curing properties of dates. Although interestingly enough, sugar (which is found in dates) actually deactivates cyanide. So maybe they were referring to this
Wow. That makes only two places the Quran is true. Muhammad if he was lying about God died the death the Quran foretold. The other place is where it says Christ's followers will be dominant.
Sad to say it wasn't the Q u r a n that foretold it, it was Mo bringing it onto himself by making that statement. If our true Creator didn't act on that, it would mean Mo spoke the truth. But yes there is another truth in the Q u r a n, a l l a h admitting to be the best makr (d cver).
@@andrevisser7542 You just ate up his nonsense and believed it. How sad to see you people are so lazy you didn't even do your research to see if its true or not
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL, funny I used to believe I slam's c laims then started to do my own homework, quickly discovered nothing in the Q u r a n is what it c laim to be, indeed the book of the best d cver.
Allah ain't even a God. For the real God YHWH sent his Son so that whoever believes in Him, shall not perish. But Allah's terms and conditions are different.
@ÄnddréwTheØne just because allah means god doesnt mean its the same God as Yahweh (dont say allah is jesus christ because it will confirm that jesus was actually God and muslims deny that🗿).
I brought this up to a muslim (who used to be an orthodox monk) and he kept telling me that Muhammad's aorta wasn't really cut and that it's not even the same word used.
he's arguing as an atheist, if you believe in God, specially muslims who claim that Allah is the best of the planners (the word in the Quran is deceiver, but they translate it was planner to make it easier to explain), then they must agree that making Mohammed suffer the same consequence he thought a fake prophet would die is an amazing plan from Allah
I had a debate with a Muslim last night on discord. Your video provided easy reference material for me to study. I was able to show Jesus Lord and sovereign God. Over Islam claim that Jesus was just a prophet. Thank you for pointing me to the resources I need to study.
@@AmberWayne1806 sure. It would be on this exact topic. I'd request you to read this entire passage to understand more. The video in Question says that Muhammed(pbuh) was constantly suffering pain after being poisoned and referred 3 Hadiths. None of them actually say anything about him being poisoned. Only Sahih Al-Bukhari mentions him feeling as if his aorta was cut off. He also mentions that both Al-abhar and Al-wateen are the same aorta's. Which isn't true. Al-Abhar is an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet. And Al-wateen is an aorta which originates from the left ventricle and creates an arch near the top of the chest cavity. And Al-wateen is connected to Al-abhar. Do they seem similar? I don't think so. While they do mean aortas they're not actually the same aorta. They're different aorta's. In The Qur'an Allah states that If Muhammed(pbuh) were to lie his right hand would be seized and his "Al-wateen" would be cut off. Which means that this specific aorta would've been cut off and his right hand would've been seized. But when Muhammed(pbuh) was talking about his pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar". Since we know that Al-abhar has it's aortas from head to feet. How can anybody confirm that it was exactly the Al-wateen part of the Al-abhar Where he was experiencing the pain? And lets say even if we did Muhammed(pbuh) knows that it's specifically called Al-wateen. Wouldn't he have referred is as so? The Video owner just speculated and presented them as facts.
But when Muhammad wasn't a true prophet, then the Quran isn't true. And when the Quran isn't true, then Muhammad could be a true prophet. And then the Quran is true, that makes Muhammad a false prophet. Islam makes no sense
@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL I ve read the Hadith and the part of the Quran mentioned. So explain why it's a lie. What you state without evidence will be rejected without evidence.
@@Dinobs8089 lol, as if Allah was powerless in giving Mohammed unambiguous words to express himself. Isn't Allah all-knowing and all-powerful? You talk as if when that happened when Allah was sleeping or on the toilet at that moment. Hopefully he used an odd number and at least 3 stones to clean his private parts.
I remember presenting this argument to a Muslim years ago and they dismissed it on the basis that Muhammad "felt" like his aorta was being cut and this is supposedly different from his aorta actually "being cut"!?!? 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
@Dinobs8089 Was he supposed to use an x-ray to show his aorta being cut? Of course the best proof was his own words testifying to the fact that he "FELT" his aorta being severed. Why would anyone want to even take the risk of following a man who basically proved he was a false prophet?
This shows you didn't even do your research properly. The Uploader showed a bunch of nonsense and mixed it with his speculations and called it a fact. And morons like you believed it.
So his aorta was cut off right in front of his wife?🤯 You guys are dumb. There are many words in many languages that say 2 worded sentences but when translated in English it adds one or more words to match the grammer of English. If you have no knowledge about Arabic grammer you shouldn't talk about it.
@@wellnahIwillnot If Arabic cannot be properly translated, then we don't need to follow anything that is written in it. Why would God write down a book in a language that most people can't understand?
@@taylenvila3915 lol. Translation also requires to match grammar. Because many languages don't require Auxiliary verbs, some of the prepositions, Article "the" etc. To complete a sentence. In my language when we want to say "He is a boy" we don't add the auxiliary verb "is" and simply just say "He a Boy". See the problem here? We don't translate everything word for word. We need to match the grammar as well. Like I said earlier. Many languages don't use the same grammatical rules as English. Is that so hard to comprehend for you guys? I figured it might because you've probably never spoke another language to know so.
@@wellnahIwillnot So what you're saying is that the book is incomprehensible. I thought it was supposed to make things "clear?" Why couldn't he make a book that everyone understands? Maybe some pictures would have helped so there's no misunderstandings. Why would they make a book that's so vague and untranslatable?
@@taylenvila3915 So you're basically saying "Why everybody doesn't speak Arabic." and also, A drawing wouldn't also make any sense since a drawing doesn't convey a message. And a language will be incomprehensible to another person who has never spoken that language. Its not just Arabic. If you see older versions of English you won't even be able to recognise many of its words and won't even understand a thing from a person who'd speak 12th century English. So the language isn't actually incomprehensible. Its just that your brain is slow.
For the muslims who are confused: Quran (69:46): The word "لَقَطَعْنَا" (We would cut) indicates an instant and decisive divine punishment for fabricating lies against Allah. The term "الوتين" (the aorta) represents the vital lifeline of a human being, and cutting it symbolizes the immediate end of life as a punishment for a grave offense. Hadith: The word "انقطاع" (severance) in the hadith reflects a gradual, physiological effect caused by the poison. The Prophet ﷺ is describing the culmination of physical pain over time, linking it to the sensation of his aorta being severed. Unlike the Quran, this is not a punishment but rather a natural consequence of the poison he had consumed, a sign of his humanity.
Honestly, without the intent of "prove intellectual superiority," anyone that really watch all this content content and be really HONEST with themselves and reflect with all the arguments exposed wouldn't follow Islam anymore. Not that it is just easy to abandon a believe like this, each people live in a different context of life, but it's worth the thought. This is just straight-up and concise apologetic content, good job!
Are Christians honest though? Because I used to be and many of us fear to even think about the possibility of being mistaken, not allowing their ideals to be questioned and it becomes blind faith or straight up ignorance, I do know Christians who are still Christians and are honest but not even those are 100% sure of God's character because there's always room for doubt and they admit it
These are easily debunkable Debates. Even this current video is easily debunkable by almost any basic Islamic scholar and someone who knows proper Arabic. the first reason of this debunk would be because He mentioned Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) being sick after consuming lamb meat is false. He was completely healthy for the next years of his life. When 2 weeks before his death the symptoms of Malaria were present when he was sick. Reason number two would be AL-abhar and Al-wateen aren't the same aortas. Al-Abhar is an aorta which Originates from the head and extends to the feet. AL-wateen is an aorta which is a part of Al-abhar and it originates from the heart and goes upside and creates an arch near the top side of the chest cavity. When Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) mentioned he felt like his aorta being cut off he stated it with Al-abhar. But in the Qur'an it states as Al-wateen which means it clearly states to cut this specific aorta. while AL-wateen is a specific aorta Al-abhar isn't and it has several more major aorta brnaches. So how can Testify prove that when Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) mentioned Al-abhar he mentioned this specific aorta out of every other major aorta under Al-abhar? The verse in the Qur'an also states that he would be seized him by his right hand. There are no mentions of it throughout his entire video. Even he himself is dishonest and created speculations and presented them as facts. He does that with almost every video he posts.
This claim is flawed for a few reasons.. First, the Quran in Surah 69:44-46 talks about a hypothetical scenario where if someone lied about Allah, they would face immediate punishment. It is literally meant to highlight Prophet Muhammad Pbuh truthfulness, not suggest he would actually lie. Second, when the Prophet described feeling like his "aorta was being severed," it literally is a metaphor. In Arabic, this kind of expression is used to describe extreme pain, not a literal event lmao. Lastly, the Quran refers to immediate consequences for lying, but the Prophet lived a long life, spreading his message for over 20 years. There is no evidence of any falsehood in his mission.
@Sayfullah-z8z Your argument only tries to escape the real issue, but it's not a solid argument to falsify the writings of the Quran. In Christianity, divine punishments are also almost not instantaneous, some took months, and some took years, likewise, in the Quran, the statement that if someone lied to Allah then we would cut his Aorta, Allah's made his punishments after years.
as a christian,this can easily be refuted. This was a natural cause,not divine punishment,bc Allah said he would punish him instead,as its Allah speaking.
yh idk why they put it forward like that, also it was meant to be a sudden death 'severed' and his message would be stopped 'take him by the right hand' physically or in that sense
"´Cutting the Aorta" refers to killing or dying. The whole Hadith says: "...that my Aorta is being cut FROM THIS POISON" saying, that he will die, because of the poison. Cutting the Aorta in the literal sense, as you said would cause an instant death. The fact that he died over a period of 3 years refutes the argument completely.
@IsaiahWagner-jx9kb Ask a Muslim, Quran tells God will make prophet cut his aorta through his hand. It’s like prophet hand will take like a knife and cut it if he were to make a lie, not he will make. Quran talks about this in past suggesting he could have had but make clear in future he will not like in all possible realities left, prophet will not make a lie Next Hadis means “aorta being suffocated from poison”, he used not as good translation which is “aorta being cut from poison” which is just also an Arabic way of saying “suffocation” and not literal cut
Paul be like: I've seen Jesus in a dream, just believe me bro! Also judgment day is within 100 years! Muhammad be like: the sun has an orbit, the universe is expanding, mountains protect from earthquakes, clouds are heavy, Pharoah's body will be preserved for future generations to see, the people of Abraham worshipped an evening planet and so on.
@@acewing3889 you missing something, Paul's companion saw the lights and they heard Jesus voices How could that be a Dream? The funniest thing is, if is a dream then why Paul became Blind 🦯???😂😂😂
Misinterpretation of the Prophet’s Death: The notion that the Prophet’s death was due to his “aorta being cut” comes from a narration where he described the pain of his illness as resembling that of his aorta being cut (This is a metaphor). The context is his suffering from the poison given to him years earlier by a Jewish woman after the Battle of Khaybar. This was not a divine punishment but a human act of treachery that Allah allowed for wisdoms only He knows.
In Islam, everything that happens is by the will and permission of Allah, but this does not mean Allah is to blame for human choices or actions. Allah grants free will to human beings, allowing them to choose their path, and they are accountable for their actions. This is a test of faith, morality, and sincerity. If someone lies or teaches falsely, it reflects their personal shortcomings, not Allah’s will for them to err. Allah may allow such situations as a trial or a means to expose truth and guide others. The Qur’an states: “And say, ‘The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills-let him believe; and whoever wills-let him disbelieve.’” (Qur’an 18:29) Blaming Allah for the choices and consequences of human actions misunderstands the divine wisdom behind tests and trials in this world. It is better to reflect on the lessons and wisdom such events might bring, and trust in Allah’s ultimate justice and mercy.
@@yusufabdi7682 "He misguides many thereby and guides many thereby. And He misguides not except the defiantly disobedient" (2:26) Why would Allah ever misguide people or make them go astray? Why doesn't he just guide them to the correct path? Where in the Quran does it say that we have free will?
@@yusufabdi7682 Yes, Muhammad's free will of him was to lie about God and be a fake prophet. So God cut his aorta in God's way, not with a knife, but with internal failure. This is why it feels like that but of course not with a knife like a human. God needs no knife.
@@yusufabdi7682all the christians in the comment section mocking prophet muhammad (PBUH) make my heart ache. Then they say we are the one mocking them. May allah guide them.
بسم الله والصلاه والسلام على رسول الله Ok lets first understand what does the quran say In surah alhaqqa allah (swt)says : وَلَوْ تَقَوَّلَ عَلَيْنَا بَعْضَ الْأَقَاوِيلِ (44) لَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِينِ (45) ثُمَّ لَقَطَعْنَا مِنْهُ الْوَتِينَ (46) It means that if the prophet said anything god didn't say and claims it is from god . He will take him with the right (means like in a strong way or extremely hard in arabic) . Then his aorta will be cut Ok now understand the prophets sayings (hadith) He said (pbuh): "فَهَذَا أَوَانُ وَجَدْتُ انْقِطَاعَ أَبْهَرِى" It is the time that my aorta is being cut in a metaphorical sentence means that is the time to die So the meanings are completely different from what u say Now the answer : 1. In the sentence "لَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِينِ (45) " Notice how in arabic the "لأ" means extremely fast and without hesitating so if the prophet lied he would die brutallyand extremely fast by getting his aorta cut but actually he died after 3 years and the revelations were coming down and the miracles were happening 2. Even the Jewish woman became a muslim like how can she poison the prophet for revenge then become muslim 3. If the prophet was a liar he would hide this verse or wouldn't say the hadith but cuz he said it it shows his honesty and high morality 4.the companion " bishr ibn baraa" Died instantly from eating this lamb like how can he die instantly from a poison and the prophet not unless the prophet had a protection . this means the poison was extremely fatal not in a long term .also she intended to make him die instantly the way she said she wanted to check if he is a prophet or not 5. The lamb talked to the prophet and told him that it is poisonous That is why only one companion died And that is how he knew that it was poisonous and told all his friends to not eat from it and brought the woman and asked her why did she put the poison. So it is a confirmed miracle
Next time don't say o Muslims u can't answer this bcuz if not me there are millions who will Me and u will stand infront of God and we will see who is speaking the truth
hope this gets into the top comments so people can see how shallow this guy's argument is, people just believe anything these days and can't even think for their own.
@@andrevisser7542 eh, while you’re correct I’ll give them this one win which is actually a loss, or if we take it away for the accurate reasons you gave then all they have are loses. Either way the quran can’t win.
@@ameribeaner, well there are apparently close to 2 billion M uslims that can tell us about Mo's prophecies that came true, wouldn't hold my breath though. 😀
It isn't little buddy. Don't run with joy and excitement because you daddy didn't actually put up a good performance against any Muslims. This video is one of the easiest to debunk. I didn't even need like 10 minutes.
@MyLittleTierList-nz5vo There are some. But I'm gonna write a short Paragraph debunking it. He mentioned 3 Hadiths that he claims confirm that he was constantly suffering from illness after eating the poisoned lamb. Where none of them actually say anything about Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) suffering after the poison. it was actually a lie and he was completely healthy for over the next 3 years after being poisoned. Sahih Al-Bukhari 4428 Mentions the poison but it was before his death and he was ill with symptoms of Malaria. He also mentions Al-wateen and Al-abhar being the same aorta which is false. Al-abhar means, "an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet". Which concludes that Al-abhar is the expression of all the aortas in the human body. Al-wateen means, "an aorta that generates from the left ventricle and extends upwards and creates and arch near the top chest cavity." which concludes that Al-wateen is a specific Aorta located in the chest cavity. Linguistically they both mean the same thing. But Al-abhar is broad and Al-wateen is specific. And the Qur'an mentions the specific aorta. While Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) mentioned a broad statement. which means it could be any aorta in his entire body. When Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) mentions feeling the pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar" Which means it could be any aorta throughout the entire body. How can you prove that he mentioned specifically "Al-wateen". He knew that the aorta in the chest cavity is called Al-wateen then why would he not mention it as Al-wateen? The Qur'an on the other hand mentions Al-wateen and also mentions that his right hand would be seized. Which means the Qur'an gave criterias that his right hand would be seized and his Al-wateen aorta would be cut off. that means Allah would've cut off this specific aorta of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) and seized him by his right hand. Since none of this criterias meet its clear that this video is just a speculation and nothing more.
@MyLittleTierList-nz5vo don't remove your comment, let that be a pin of shame. I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that you laid it out in a premise-conclusion form and yet you still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P. Lemme show you how dumb his logic is: 1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks. 2. The egg is broken 3. Therefore the egg fell down. See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
Well you may be right but it brings into question Muhammad you are right it is not the best argument against Islam (that would be something like the mean ing behind the old and new testmont prophets names).
I myself am a Christian, and I'd recommend reading it. Not just for rebuttals, but because it's genuinely an interesting, and hilarious, read. Same reason I advise other Christians to read other religious texts, they're interesting reads, and they help you gain a look on what people of that religion actually think.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL I mean if you can disprove any of the claims in the video, then I for one would be more than happy to change my view, as would any intellectual honest person.
@LucienMahikai sure. I'd request you to read this entire passage to understand more. The video in Question says that Muhammed(pbuh) was constantly suffering pain after being poisoned and referred 3 Hadiths. None of them actually say anything about him being poisoned. Only Sahih Al-Bukhari mentions him feeling as if his aorta was cut off. He also mentions that both Al-abhar and Al-wateen are the same aorta's. Which isn't true. Al-Abhar is an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet. And Al-wateen is and aorta which originates from the left ventricle and creates and arch on the chest cavity. It is connected to Al-abhar. Do they seem the same aortas? For me they aren't. In the Qur'an it mentions that if Muhammed(pbuh) were to lie his right hand would be seized and his "Al-wateen" aorta would be cut off. So that means Qur'an set a criteria that his right hand would be seized and "Al-wateen" aorta would be cut off. When Muhammed(pbuh) mentions his pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar". So how can the video owner claim that Muhammed(pbuh) mentioned this specific aorta while addressing a general aorta that has several more major aortas. He knows that this specific aorta is called Al-wateen since he is the one who was revealed the verse through. He knows the name of that aorta so why would he not just say Al-wateen?
Basically he only means Disrespecting his personal religion is not allowed but he himself will do it and so will his minions but thats okay Because its not his religion 👍🏽
Sahih al-Bukhari 4428: I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison. "Being cut" suggests his aorta was in the process of being severed from the moment he ate the poison and he revealed this himself as the cause of his death. How they conclude that he "survived" and his death was natural is baffling. He broke the devil's terms and conditions (apostasy law) and paid the price. Service to the devil for fame and power is always conditional. Mohammed was no stranger to witchcraft and the likes, and supposedly lived under a spell for around 6 months to 1 year. Even that in itself is enough to disqualify any true prophet of God, not to talk of the satanic verses, superstitious beliefs and his "alleged" physical encounter with demons (Sahih Bukhari 3423).
You've just made up terms to seem cool. There are no confirmations in any book that being under a spell disqualifies of someone being a prophet. There are no proof of Satanic verses. those are just speculations to deceive others. There was no "alleged" physical contact with the Jinn A.K.A. demon.
according to sahih muslim 6666, the sins of muslims are placed onto christians and jews, my theory as to why allah created Christianity in islam is to create a population of sacrificial lambs for muslims
@@BoereViking 1. Because there's something called "free will" because Prophet isa's intention wasn't to claim to be God in the first place,and Instead lead people to the worship of Allah but Christians chose to worship prophet isa instead via their ability to make conscious choices 2. Allah made this world as a test for us so he wouldn't just stop us from making wrong choices,like how a teacher would allow his student to answer incorrectly in his exam but that doesn't mean he didn't give the answers while he was teaching them
@@Careless555 1. The first Christians were worshipping Jesus. Everyone around him understood that he was making a divine claim. He would've said otherwise, had it been false. He would've rejected the worship he had been receiving like the angels and OTHER prophets had. Do you know of any other legitimate sinless prophet who forgave sins? Because I don't. 2. The only problem, and Testify has demonstrated it on his channel, is that Muhummad was clearly still making the wrong choices, even with a "sinless prophet" claim. Allah would've sent Muhummad 600 years later after Jesus and all of the things he did, so that would make Allah a liar, which is a sin. You saying God can sin? that's ludicrous.
@LeoAnimationsTMNT 1. Can you give evidence to justify your claim of Christians at that time worshipping Jesus and him claiming to be God without appealing to the bible which contains logical contradictions (formally logical ones) and the concept of the Trinity which either violates the law of identity or leads to polytheism,so I don't think the statement of Jesus claiming to be divine has a sufficient and well constructed ground for it's truth since its based using the bible 2. How did prophet muhammad sin? Because if you are talking about his marriage with Aisha then let me tell you:in the old Arabian lands they begin to measure a girl's age when she reaches puberty so a girl who is 1 year old by their standards is 10 years old chronologically,meaning that Aisha should be at least 19 year and that means that prophet Muhammad pbuh did not commit a sin,also that's a complete non sequitur since nothing in the premise of Jesus being sinless indicates that there would be no prophet after him
@Careless555 without the Bible? Sure. We have the Mogiddo Mosaic and Pliny the Younger reaffirming the worshipping and deity of Christ, and that's just off the top of my head. If Jesus were to claim to be God, that would make it a biblical text, would it not? And, what's your evidence of these "logical contradictions?" Or is this just a way to prevent the Bible from being used? Smart play on your end. Is the fact that he's claimed divine titles, received worship, and forgave sins not convincing enough for you? Also, the idea you seem to have on the Trinity being polytheism just tells me you don't actually know what the Trinity is, and that's fine, because Allah didn't either. He claimed it was made up God, Jesus, and Mary, something no doctrine of Christianity believes. Just sounds like an uneducated Arab claiming to be Allah. 2. This accepts the premise that marrying and having sex with a minor ISN'T a sin. Sin doesn't change based on the time periods it was done in, and the claim is that Islam is timeless. So, are you saying that having sex with a 9 year old isn't wrong? (Also, I don't even have to talk about that, because we can talk about his sex slaves and/or his pillaging of tribes that wasn't an act of self defense, but as a "spread by the sword" tactic.)
I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that he laid it out in a premise-conclusion form but still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P. Lemme show you how dumb his logic is: 1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks. 2. The egg is broken 3. Therefore the egg fell down. See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
The Quran basically says the thing people say when they want to be believed. AKA “May lightning strike me if I am lying!” The Hadiths say Momo complained the pain he experienced in his last days was like the pain he would receive if he made stuff up. It would be like the person who said the lightning statement dying from electrocution.
So you're saying this poison had given Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) Symptoms of Malaria after 3 years? Nice joke. You guys should make a comedy club and make us laugh.
@@TestifyApologetics Which verse exactly says that a false prophet would die a slow and painful Death? Your lies are massively unbelievable. You present speculations like they're facts.
As a Muslim, I will mention that I am only educated as much as my lord has decreed. But you cannot just say it is not a coincidence becuase I said so. If his aorta was being cut it doesnt directly indicate it was as he was a false prophet.
Oh Allah give them Hidayah! Before we even start, we can see that different words are used (Wateen in the Quran) and (Ahbar in the Hadith). Ahbar is a general term for the main vein in the body of which the aorta is part of (which is why it is translated such sometimes). Wateen is always Aorta, Ahbar doesn't necessarily mean aorta.
And you proceeded to make the same stupid argument which is debunked in this video Repent and trust in Christ for salvation or you will be damned along with your false prophet
this hadith is a suspended hadith The suspended hadith is one of the types of weak hadith (returned); Because it lacked one of the conditions for acceptance, which is the continuity of the chain of transmission. The deleted narrator is unknown, and his condition and degree of control are not known.
Sahih al-Bukhari is the first hadith collection of the Six Books of Sunni Islam. Compiled by Islamic scholar al-Bukhari in the musannaf format, the work is valued by Muslims, alongside Sahih Muslim, as the most authentic after the Qur'an. So are you claiming the more useful Hadiths Important for Muslims, is a weak Hadiths according to you ???
@@roginyappl7158 see here the problem Quran never say be Sunni Muslim or be Shea Muslim or Sufi those are words of man. Quran say be Muslim the end. the definition of Muslim: Submission to God. the only book is saved form distorted is the Quran and the only Sunna or hadith is saved from distorted is Practical ٍٍSunna
@@fluxnekta this is how muslims escape from arguments. Either they say it's suspended hadith or you have misinterpreted the hadith. Yet they keep claiming their book and believes are unchangeable 😂
I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that you laid it out in a premise-conclusion form but still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P. Lemme show you how dumb your logic is: 1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks. 2. The egg is broken 3. Therefore the egg fell down. See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
Yes, word used in Hadis is actually an old translation of Quran which is not accepted by scholars now a days. Most closest translation in English is prophet said that he is dying by suffocation or shortness of breath He didn’t said cut by aorta, and neither prophet aorta was cut anyway either. And the verse he mention is saying if prophet did it that prophet will do it before but it doesn’t say anything about future as Allah knows future and know there is no possibility of prophet ever lying but it’s just if prophet lied, that’s what will happen to him!
Also, slavery isn’t encouraged in islam, it’s discouraged unlike in their own faith. Also, our “slavery” is because slavery ended like 200 years ago and in prophet time, there was whole system of slavery When Disbelievers killed Muslims and forced war on us, we defeated them and took their lands and prophet never stole anything from any land infact those people money were used back on them Also, rules on war were, not to kill children, women, elder, sick, anyone who surrenders, and not to destroy places of worship of people or places of living or crops and not to kill animals and cut trees for no reasons ( animals and trees only ) When we conqueror, their kings used to have massive number of slaves including many women, male slaves still could earn money some way, these slaves didn’t had any money, food, place to live and in past, they were just left to die So, these slaves in islam are only “existing slaves taken as prisoners of war”, these slaves were given to a Muslim family and person that is owner, same gender one are brothers and sister of each other and opposite genders are equal ( almost ) as your wife or husbands So, we treat slave as brother, or for me a wife but now there are no slave existing Freeing a slave is one of biggest good deeds Why islam allows sex with slaves and don’t consider it adultery? It’s because slaves do have sexual desires and they will do adultery which punishment is 100 lashes if 4 witnesses are and it gets popular else just ask God for mercy because if people know, it spread corruption in land. If you are sincere, you may not even be punished, and lashes can be like very low chances to be implied as people accept their mistakes and ask for forgiveness and forgiveness is given as Allah can forgive all sins Why Muslim didn’t freed them? It’s because same thing, women slave can’t earn in past, no place to live in Muslim families either because it’s haram! I mean, they will need to create their own house inside a house or marry someone and as a slave, they are already are wife or brother or sister or husband of owner Can’t you see, I mean, if I ask a Christian a question in Bible, he literally tells look in Quran and it’s not even in Quran and if it is, the definition like “slavery” they have doesn’t exist in Islamic definition of “slavery”. We don’t consider their genocidal slavery as Right and we consider our family related slavery as Right because it’s a step and your son isn’t a slave either and prophet also had a slave called Maria and prophet had child with her and later there is saying that prophet married her! Why? It’s because it’s allowed and she is consider almost as wife of prophet
@@SqueakyPhilosopher I searched modern translation of Arabic, word means “suffocation” not “cut with poison” -> Which doesn’t mean cut literally Also, Quran said “We will cut from him [his] the aorta”,Means, prophet Muhammad himself will cut his aorta which didn’t happened
He felt pain in his aorta of it slowly getting cut off. The poision was a slow killer and it killed him after a few years by fully chopping of the aorta.
@laithhz In the Hadith Muhammad said the poison was cutting his aorta either the poison killed him or Muhammad is lieing Testify didn’t make the argument he just explained it. The argument had existed for many years. Poision like Arsenic can take years to kill.
Amazing work as usual keep on doing Gods purpose which is to reveal the truth and show all the lies and deception with these fake prophets and fake religions. JESUS CHRIST IS LORD AND KING! ✝️👑🕊️🙏🏼❤️🔥
There's even more that wasnt brought to main attention. The woman who poisoned him said "If he is a prophet, he will be informed; but if he is only a king, we will get rid of him" He was not warned and was gotten rid of, therefore Muhammed is not a prophet.
The line "Muhammad felt as though his aorta was being cut," has added to. He says, in the original translation states that his aorta was being cut. Not that he thought it was or it felt like it was. Muhammad confirmed the curse of a false prophet is to have the aorta cut and he confirmed that it was cut.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he was very sick that he kept fainting according Sunan Ibn Majah 1234. Then he mentioned he was dying from sickness according to Sahih Al bukhari 4428 he mentioned the poison.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL @ he suffered for years from the poison until he died from it. My aorta has been cut. Choosing same words in Quran 69:44-46. False prophet.
Well if Muhammad was fake then he should know about Judaism and Christianity and as he accepts Jesus as a prophet who didnt he teach Christianity instead?
This is _you need to look at the arabic._ Because the "aorta" used in the Qur'an is totally different than the "aorta" in the Hadith, so it was talking about two different body part. Also, poison was super lethal, the friend that also eat the poison instantly died but Muhammad didn't.
@@Auriel4 really? It took 4 years for thr instant death cyanide to finally work its magic? Also, there is another part of the Qur'an that didn't get mention. "We would have _seized him by the right hand._ Then We would have cut from him the aorta." His right hand was never seized.
@Auriel4 really? It took 4 years for thr instant death cyanide to finally work its magic? Also, there is another part of the Qur'an that didn't get mention. "We would have seized him by the right hand." His right hand was never seized.
@@Auriel4well not for a poison which is supposed to be a instant death Even with different anatomy a poison like that can take maximum a few days or weeks to finish off the job If they both received the same dose how was one able to die instantly while the other survived for 3 years
You just spread a fake rumor. It was delayed because they wanted to decide who would be the next Caliphe. as it was a cruicial time when decision makings would be big.
Nope they did not, Abu bakr said Muhammad was a human and Allah said in Quran that prophets have passed before them and So he will pass away as well, And no muslims do not believe Jesus “came back alive” as we believe he never died in the first place that’s Ahmadis the heretics, early muslims believed Jesus did dissapear for a few days but then started appearing to Mary Magdelene and others etc,
In aya 46 , you have the word (الوتين) which means the aurta right, no , it's a tendon called the Attachments of the heart , not an artery ,and thank you 🙂 Edit: Sorry guys I made a mistake, الوتين ، is not a tendon, its a vain , and it also proves our Christian guy wrong 🙂
Hey, one question I have for you. Which denomination do you believe in? Are you Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Presbyterian etc. I'm really curious :)
@@SqueakyPhilosopherall the comments are literally christians who are mocking and disrespecting prophet muhammad. Then they say muslim disrespect christians. Baffles and saddens me
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he suffered from the poison for years and the fainting was one of the signs until his last day and he used same words my aorta as in Quran 69:44-46
@@samsam-nx8gq Nope he didn't. he used Al-abhar which is an aorta that starts from the head and extends to the feet. Whike the Qur'an states Al-wateen which is an aorta that starts from the left ventricle of the heart and forms an arch near the chest cavity. Al-wateen is a part of Al-abhar but not exactly Al-abhar as Al-abhar has several more major aortas like Al wateen. Which means the Qur'an states a specific aorta to fullfil the criteria of his death if he were to lie about the Qur'an. And the Verses also state that he would be seized by his right hand which also didn't happen. And he also didn't die because his aorta was cut off. If it were to happen it would've been called inernal bleeding instead of death because of sickness. He wasn't suffering from any of the effects of the poison. He was sick with symptoms of Malaria during his last days.
@ sounds like saying my bed room is not part of my house lol. A damage at any part of the vein will cause the suffering. I never heard he died from malaria so provide me the reference of Malaria.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he did, sounds like saying my bed room is not part of my house lol. A damage at any part of the vein will cause the suffering. I never hereafter if him having malaria so provide me the reference of Malaria.
@@krii2fly word used their means suffocation, and Quran talks about past and prophet aorta wasn’t cut either He used wrong interpretation and you all followed “Joker L edition 2024 yakk “ God may curse all the lairs
I had an argument with a believer who was claiming Momo was peaceful with other religions. My question was, wasn't he poisoned by a jew woman whose family was slaughtered by Momo. And this guy's reply was like : The jew woman offered him meat which was on a feast organized between jews and Muslims which is contradicting your claim that Momo was massacring jews!! 😂
Well he was. And I guess your buttery smooth brain didn't do his research. Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) was in truce with the Jews when one of the Jewish tribe Banu Nadir decided to try and kill Prophet Muhammed(pbuh). they were expelled from Medina. After which they tried to continue their hostile activities towards Muslims which led to the battle of khaybar. After which Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) was poisoned by the Jewish women who also happened to kill one of his companions named Bishr with the poison. and his family decided to execute her. Which has nothing to do with Muhammed. Is it enough or do I have to provide sources for you?
no lie, muslims have told me "well this means his prophecy came true, so he IS a prophet!"
💀
Proof of Islam you see, Muhammad is a false prophet! I'm going to take my Shahada right now.
He's a prophet for predicting his death... really shitty prophet, all humans die so mohamed jalauddin the 601248753285042th is the shittiest prophet ever
oh my 😂😂😂
I hear a similar story from Christians
I love how Muhammed wrote this, probably feeling super smug, and God was just like "challenge accepted."
I've already debunked this pathetic video, as it regurgigates David woods talking points
@@alatuseditsjust saying you don’t like the truth doesn’t make it a lie.
@@petarmilich8684 I've provided a debunk in my previous comment where testify replied. And he won't reply again, since he knows he's wrong
@@alatusedits Is your objection different from the ones mentioned in this video and if so I would like to hear it
@@Otto_Von_Beansmarck This piece addresses and debunks the claims made by Testify regarding Surah 69:46 of the Qur'an, which discusses the potential fate of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he were to fabricate any of Allah's revelations. Testify argues that there is a contradiction between this verse and the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death. Specifically, they claim that the verse implies a threat of death through the severing of the aorta, and since the Prophet did not die in this way, it suggests the Qur'an is inconsistent and Muhammad (peace be upon him) was a false prophet.
First, it’s important to clarify the misinterpretation of the term "aorta" in Surah 69:46. Testify claims the verse speaks about the severing of the aorta, using the word "al-wateen." However, the Arabic word "al-wateen" in this verse is different from the word used in hadith literature, "al-abhar." "Al-wateen" refers to a vein in the heart, and if severed, it would cause death, while "al-abhar" refers to a vein running down from the head. Renowned Arabic dictionaries such as Taaj al-'Aroos and al-Qaamoos Al-Muheet clarify that the two terms are not synonymous, and "al-wateen" is specifically associated with death from a vein in the heart.
Furthermore, the phrase "cut my aorta" was a common idiom in pre-Islamic and Islamic Arabic, symbolizing death, rather than a literal severing of the aorta. Several sources, including Imam az-Zamakhshari, confirm that this phrase was widely understood metaphorically in Arabic literature to mean death, not the literal cutting of a vein.
The claim that the Prophet (peace be upon him) died due to the literal severing of the aorta, as predicted in Surah 69:46, is unfounded. The verse refers to a hypothetical situation where the Prophet (peace be upon him) would face immediate death if he fabricated any part of Allah’s revelation. It is not a description of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) actual death. The circumstances surrounding his death (poisoning and its prolonged effects) do not contradict the warning in the verse.
Surah 69:46 is not a prophecy of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death, but rather a conditional statement about the consequences of altering or fabricating Allah’s revelations. The verse does not claim that the Prophet (peace be upon him) will die in a specific manner, but rather that if he were to ascribe falsehoods to Allah, he would face swift punishment.
Testify’s claim about the Jewish lady’s criteria for prophethood is flawed. Her views are irrelevant to Islamic beliefs. Muslims follow the Qur'an, which allows for the possibility of a prophet’s death without compromising their prophethood (3:144). Moreover, prophets have been killed by Jews in the past, as stated in both the Qur'an (5:70) and the Bible. The Jewish lady contradicts her own scriptures, where prophets like Zechariah (2 Chronicles 24:20-22) and others during Elijah’s time were killed. Furthermore, multiple narrations suggest that the Prophet passed her test, meaning Testify’s critique is based on a flawed premise.
Testify argues that Bishr’s faith in Muhammad led to his death, implying that the Prophet’s actions were somehow to blame. However, it was never promised that the Prophet (peace be upon him) would protect his followers from harm in every situation. Bishr’s decision to continue eating was based on his own assumption, not a directive from the Prophet. Additionally, the Prophet (peace be upon him) was not omniscient, and this does not undermine his prophethood. Testify’s critique is irrelevant when compared to similar situations in Christian scripture.
Testify also misinterprets the Prophet’s statement "Allah would never allow it." The Prophet was not implying that the poison would never affect him, but rather that the attempt to kill him would not succeed at that moment. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was still fulfilling his mission of conveying the message of Islam, and his death would not occur before this. The context suggests that the Jewish woman’s plan to kill him was unsuccessful at that moment because Allah’s protection was still in place. The timing of his death was part of Allah’s divine plan, and questioning it is to challenge God’s wisdom.
Testify’s questions about why the lamb didn’t speak earlier are based on a misunderstanding of divine will. The Prophet (peace be upon him) receiving a revelation through the lamb is part of God's plan, and questioning the timing of this is a futile attempt to challenge divine wisdom. The fact that the Prophet received revelation when needed, rather than immediately, aligns with God’s greater plan, which we may not always fully comprehend.
Testify’s statement that Muhammad provoked hatred against Jews and oppressed women is historically inaccurate. The Prophet (peace be upon him) advocated for justice and fairness, and his actions and teachings regarding women were progressive for their time. The Prophet’s relationship with Jews was complex, and while there were conflicts, this does not equate to a history of provoking hatred. Furthermore, the claim that Muhammad oppressed women is a misrepresentation of Islamic teachings, which emphasized the protection and dignity of women.
Testify’s claim that Allah showed favoritism by protecting Jesus and not Muhammad is based on a false comparison. The Qur’an and other scriptures acknowledge that prophets may face trials, and their deaths occur as part of God’s plan. The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) died from the poison does not diminish his status or the validity of his message. The notion of "favoritism" is irrelevant because each prophet’s journey was determined by divine wisdom, and we should not judge God’s actions based on human reasoning.
In conclusion, Testify’s claims are addressed and refuted by clarifying misinterpretations of the Arabic language, idiomatic expressions, and the lack of any direct connection between Surah 69:46 and the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death. The verse is a hypothetical statement about the consequences of fabricating Allah’s message, not a prophecy of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) death.
Islam literally gave spoilers about his failure, and more than 2 billion people are following this failure
I mean literally no one actually believed in him or his words until much much later after his death when the "ummah" was invading ans spread the words via a sword look at any historical islamic figures outside of faith they're all just blood thirty conquerors
Fun fact Bro says Do not disrespect while disrespecting
Why is this comment 9 days old? Am I the only one that see this?
@@emje8707 I didn't notice till u pointed it out but wth
@@UncleTerterYeah tf happened
Incredibly poetic that a lamb was what done him in (Jesus is the lamb), and God's message about his partner was clear. If you follow this man (his companion said he was suspicious but ate because he saw momo eat) you're going to die. God is truly the best of poets.
Thanks for the heart!
it is indeed the Beast of Apocalypse
Nice one, the Lamb defeated s atan and his p rophet.
It is still happening. One of the strongest arguments against the typical "the previous texts are corrupted" is the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and who found them? A shepherd. In a cave no less.
And a Jewish woman gave lamb to him. Mary?
Fun fact: the "as if" is added in the English version, making it more danced around rather than it seeming like Allah's calling him a false prophet
I was looking for an explanation of this. "As if" and "Is happening" are two very different things.
@rosswalenciak3739 exactly, so it definitely seems weirdly translated. If not done with the intent to be secretive about anything (which of course they are)
Well his aorta was not cut so this argument doesn’t even make sense
@@yoeyyoey8937 Narrated `Aisha:
The Prophet (ﷺ) in his ailment in which he died, used to say, "O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison."
Sahih al-Bukhari 4428
You're welcome.
@qasmb thanks I guess? Idk why you posted that, good luck next time
"They are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.” Matthew 15:14
Sahih al-Bukhari 7018
By Allah, though I am Allah's Messenger, *I neither know what will happen to **_me,_** nor to **_you._* 💀
🕳️👨🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯🦯☪️
(Context: What happens to a good Muslim after death ☠️)
@@timd3895
Even Muhammad didn't know what would come to him as the "greatest" man, al-ham-to-diddy-la.
@@MetroMan13I LOVE YOU METROMAN
@@johannthedeceitful5968
Thanks and love you too bro. God bless ✝️ ☦️
@@MetroMan13 stop yapping nonsense about islam
God has an amazing sense of humor, especially with how muhammed died.
@@Savedsmile LORD Jesus said so Himself. You shall be held accountable for every idle word that comes from your mouth.
Nietzsche had a similar story
DIED BY A LAMB LOL
@@Makaneek5060 You mean the guy that got edgy towards the end of his life? How did he die?
@@greats-lm3kr God: The Best in Humor!
Glory to The Father, Son and Holy Spirit
As it was in the begining is now and ever shall be, a world without end.
Amen.
Amen 🙏💪🗣️🗣️🔥☦️✝️
Amen 🙏✝️☦️
@@RansomedSoulPsalm49-15 forever will be
Polytheism
One of the few things the Quaran gets right
Exactly.
😭😭😭😭
There are a lot of things that is right in the Quran and how it made Islam false if Quran predicted the prophet death it's so stupid he is a human not like you
A lamb killed him. A lamb. Who is known as a lamb?
That’s crazy!!!
Poison killed him bro. Lamb was very common food
@@yoeyyoey8937 poisoned lamb*
I get your point, but it's bad dude. The lamb saves.
Huh? He was killed by a lamb and did not die because he was sick?! 🤯🤯 Thank you sir. I would've dies without this information.
Not sure why this is unlisted because this is a very solid video
Because it should have only been available for channel members.
How is this comment 9 days ago?
It’s not solid it’s very bad it’s stretching so hard it’s way easier to disprove Jesus was god then to make sense of this
@@yoeyyoey8937 Cope harder.
@@yoeyyoey8937 provide evidence for your statement.
So many dilemmas with no sound theology whatsoever to reconcile it or explain it.
How can anyone follow this without being intellectually dishonest with themselves?
@@Heroesworkshop tradition, not always the best thing to hold on to.
It’s the Dawah way. Gaslight and mislead believers instructed to listen to their dawahs.
They have to deceive themselves and others to defend the biggest lie.😢
Muslims will say that the Bible has been corrupt, I tell them which quranic verse says the Bible has been corrupt?
They have to resort to saying the Bible has been corrupted because it contradicts the quran.
For example: Noah's sons dying in the flood, Jesus not being crucified, Literally so many times God is called Father, but in Islam, we are Allah's slaves. Not even a niece or something! But just a slave.
Tradition, family ties, and willful ignorance. The same holds true for countless faulty Protestant churches as well.
@@AyEhm-ii2dpMost Protestant families won’t shun or disown a family member that apostatized. The worst might be evangelizing or having philosophical arguments.
“COINCIDENCE? I THINK NOT!”
- Testify (probably)
shoulda used that meme, it's Incredible
@@TestifyApologetics 💀
@@TestifyApologeticsthats it im calling eckosolider/pixel ecko
I myself am a Christian, and I'd recommend reading it. Not just for rebuttals, but because it's genuinely an interesting, and hilarious, read. Same reason I advise other Christians to read other religious texts, they're interesting reads, and they help you gain a look on what people of that religion actually think.
i advise you to read the whole Bible first rather than read other books
@@Xman-j3p I have. KJV, NIV, Geneva, I've read the Bible in Hebrew and Greek, I have read the Bible multiple times in multiple ways. Just saying, read other religious books too.
At least the Bible is actually coherent
You’d have to actually think tho. And if they do then they risk not coming out of it Christian. Be careful out there
@@Djxiv83847at least other religions don’t spoon feed you what you’re supposed to believe or else
Furthermore, the fact that God, in the Bible, gives people time to repent before judgement shows that God was gracious to Muhammad before proving he was a false prophet, by even utilizing his own false prophecies, by giving him time to repent, as well.
Why he need to repent???
@@Dinobs8089Who's is the False prophet
@@Dinobs8089 why did Muhammad need to repent? Have you read about him?
@ yes
@ he was called al ameen before he became prophet but then people rejected him because he was against their beliefs lol
Reminds me of Ahmed Deedat who asked Allah to silence the liar and then not much later he had a stroke and became a vegetable who couldn't speak for 9 years.
Bwahahahaha!!!
So we believe one of our prophet was also so ill too
@@Dinobs8089 Ill or possessed?
Jesus was crucified at end , I think he is also liar acc to you. But acc to me I beleive jesus and mohammed
@@SamGhost-ul3ot Jesus prophecied His death and resurrection for the remission of sins for the world not for a punishment of being a false prophet.
John 2:19-21
19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
Here before it even gets uploaded. Continue making great videos.
more like *continue spreading misinformation in the name of spreading the gospel
@@UzairSayyid237ok Muslim. God bless you anyway.
@@DynamicLights nope stop sugarcoating, God will not bless me accordin to christianity I’m cursed and doomed for eternal torture- Please accept the fact that god doesn’t like disbelievers like muslims accept it instead of sugarcoating thanks
you know the argument Uzair, just say why it doesn't work and don't resort to mental gymnastics. (And for the love of Pete, get a better mic)
@@TestifyApologetics you should do a response video to this guy. Great video ❤
Oh my, I pray for Jesus surrounding light to protect you from the pain to come especially with how many Muslims will be upset.
Some of them, they're always upset...
Not always @@willyb7353
Who is upset due to this video😂😂he is giving muslims free content to debunk the video
Crazy u guys think he is making valid points lol
@@Dinobs8089 Found one ☝️
He didn't even present facts. He just presented speculations which He thinks are facts and fed them to unsuspecting morons like yourself💀💀
The fact that Jesus is The Lamb of God and it was a lamb from a Jewish lady that did him in is simply BEAUTIFUL
It gets even worse when in the arabic version he doesn’t say he feels like it is being cut, he says that he LITERALLY feels it being cut. They changed the scripts when translating it to other languages.
As a Muslim myself, who have read Sahih Bukhari full, I felt confused when u said that Hadith, I checked 4428, OH WHAT DID I FIND, on my god who created me, it says nothing about aorta being cut or anything, but in hadith 5777, it does say about a Jewish women who gave prophet poisoned food, and in another book called sunan abu dawood hadith 4512, prophet told that he feels as if his aorta is being cut, and in the Tafsir (explanation) the word aorta is used as a metamorphical veiw… u can continue to spread false information… jahils nowadays..
@@ItsDumbChessHerewatch the vid?
He feels it but it doesn’t mean it’s being cut
@@ItsDumbChessHereexactly it’s just a phrase people used
@@yoeyyoey8937these ignorant followers of testify doesn’t care…
Man im gonna add this argument to my arsenal.
@@rjd08l it’s honestly so trash lmao
@Idekambruv U just mad you can't debunk it lol
@@rjd08l i can send you the refutation if you want lol
@@rjd08lit’s easy to debunk: Mohamed’s aorta was not cut. It’s over
Donkey, the battle of Khaybar happened 4 years before his death. Laughable.
Keep up your amazing work Testify. I consider your channel to be the best apologetics channel in the entire world.
@@erickotaviooo as far as the evidence for the new testament goes he’s definitely the best i’ve seen
@@COOlguy-ed5bqAllah made all people finger print for judgement day and rebirth purposes mention in quran sura kiyamat read it also made eye password and dna code and coccyx bone in tail
Allah made all people finger print for judgement day and rebirth purposes mention in quran sura kiyamat read it
@@HasanRony-wv3xdRead it yourself first. 😂
it’s so funny how he says in the hadith that if you eat 7 dates in the morning you’ll never be poisoned.
That’s not what that means
He should have eaten 200 dates each morning
@@ClemTec dates are good for your digestion and help regulate blood sugar, this Hadith has nothing to do with any magical poison-curing properties of dates. Although interestingly enough, sugar (which is found in dates) actually deactivates cyanide. So maybe they were referring to this
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@yoeyyoey8937 WHat does it mean? he didnt eat his dates that day? and hence fell to poisoning?
Wow. That makes only two places the Quran is true.
Muhammad if he was lying about God died the death the Quran foretold.
The other place is where it says Christ's followers will be dominant.
Sad to say it wasn't the Q u r a n that foretold it, it was Mo bringing it onto himself by making that statement. If our true Creator didn't act on that, it would mean Mo spoke the truth.
But yes there is another truth in the Q u r a n, a l l a h admitting to be the best makr (d cver).
@@andrevisser7542 You just ate up his nonsense and believed it. How sad to see you people are so lazy you didn't even do your research to see if its true or not
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL, funny I used to believe I slam's c laims then started to do my own homework, quickly discovered nothing in the Q u r a n is what it c laim to be, indeed the book of the best d cver.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL Stop talking drivel, its not nonsense its true. You're the lazy 1.
Even Allah knows Muhammad is a fake prophet 😂😂😂
Maybe, Because "Allah" isn't God.
Allah ain't even a God. For the real God YHWH sent his Son so that whoever believes in Him, shall not perish. But Allah's terms and conditions are different.
Allah means God in Arabic. So what God do they pray to 5 times a day? I can also say that the true Allah is Jesus Christ.
@thekingofbunga2912 Allah is just God in arabic; he is the same god, the abrahamic god.
@ÄnddréwTheØne just because allah means god doesnt mean its the same God as Yahweh (dont say allah is jesus christ because it will confirm that jesus was actually God and muslims deny that🗿).
I love how Muslims are so prideful that they know the Quaran cover to cover, but they all just ignore this part.
not all muslims believe hadith is 100% true. some even reject it.
"He who digs the pit, shall fall in the same pit"😂
I brought this up to a muslim (who used to be an orthodox monk) and he kept telling me that Muhammad's aorta wasn't really cut and that it's not even the same word used.
Addressed at 2:42
@@djordjeprodanovic6292 Learn Arabic
he's arguing as an atheist, if you believe in God, specially muslims who claim that Allah is the best of the planners (the word in the Quran is deceiver, but they translate it was planner to make it easier to explain), then they must agree that making Mohammed suffer the same consequence he thought a fake prophet would die is an amazing plan from Allah
I'm literally quoting Arabic medical dictionaries in the video
@@TestifyApologetics they probably say that Muhammad only felt like it was being cut
I had a debate with a Muslim last night on discord. Your video provided easy reference material for me to study. I was able to show Jesus Lord and sovereign God. Over Islam claim that Jesus was just a prophet. Thank you for pointing me to the resources I need to study.
PLEASE TELL ME HOW IT GOESSSSS❤
Al Wateen and Al Abhor don't nesecarily mean the exact same thing
You wanna have a debate with me?
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL may I ask what question you’d debate on? ❤️
@@AmberWayne1806 sure. It would be on this exact topic.
I'd request you to read this entire passage to understand more. The video in Question says that Muhammed(pbuh) was constantly suffering pain after being poisoned and referred 3 Hadiths. None of them actually say anything about him being poisoned. Only Sahih Al-Bukhari mentions him feeling as if his aorta was cut off.
He also mentions that both Al-abhar and Al-wateen are the same aorta's. Which isn't true. Al-Abhar is an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet. And Al-wateen is an aorta which originates from the left ventricle and creates an arch near the top of the chest cavity. And Al-wateen is connected to Al-abhar. Do they seem similar? I don't think so. While they do mean aortas they're not actually the same aorta. They're different aorta's.
In The Qur'an Allah states that If Muhammed(pbuh) were to lie his right hand would be seized and his "Al-wateen" would be cut off. Which means that this specific aorta would've been cut off and his right hand would've been seized. But when Muhammed(pbuh) was talking about his pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar". Since we know that Al-abhar has it's aortas from head to feet. How can anybody confirm that it was exactly the Al-wateen part of the Al-abhar Where he was experiencing the pain? And lets say even if we did Muhammed(pbuh) knows that it's specifically called Al-wateen. Wouldn't he have referred is as so? The Video owner just speculated and presented them as facts.
But when Muhammad wasn't a true prophet, then the Quran isn't true. And when the Quran isn't true, then Muhammad could be a true prophet. And then the Quran is true, that makes Muhammad a false prophet.
Islam makes no sense
No because if quran is true then Muhammed is prophet because quran tells he is
Lol. You just believed what he said without any research. He just fed you a bunch of lies.
@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL I ve read the Hadith and the part of the Quran mentioned. So explain why it's a lie. What you state without evidence will be rejected without evidence.
@@joekeros3579 does the hadith tells allah cut the aorta or something like that?
@@Dinobs8089 lol, as if Allah was powerless in giving Mohammed unambiguous words to express himself. Isn't Allah all-knowing and all-powerful? You talk as if when that happened when Allah was sleeping or on the toilet at that moment. Hopefully he used an odd number and at least 3 stones to clean his private parts.
I remember presenting this argument to a Muslim years ago and they dismissed it on the basis that Muhammad "felt" like his aorta was being cut and this is supposedly different from his aorta actually "being cut"!?!? 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
Isnt it true?he felt like that
@Dinobs8089 Was he supposed to use an x-ray to show his aorta being cut? Of course the best proof was his own words testifying to the fact that he "FELT" his aorta being severed. Why would anyone want to even take the risk of following a man who basically proved he was a false prophet?
It was technically a different artery
@@randomhuman2595 BuT TeStIfY SpeCuLaTeS ThAt It WaS Al-WaTeEn. -Some christians who didn't research anything and blindly believed him.
@@Dinobs8089 Yeah he felt like that because it was happening.
God appears to enjoy irony.
and its wonderfully ironic to honour a curse written by pagans even though they were speaking nonsense at the time.
Every day I wake up more catholic 🙏
Same 🙏
@@noya7329 Same 🥲
🇻🇦
Jesus: I will die horribly, which will prove my divinity
Momo: If I die horribly, it proves I'm a liar
Momodians: tHey thE saMe
This shows you didn't even do your research properly. The Uploader showed a bunch of nonsense and mixed it with his speculations and called it a fact. And morons like you believed it.
Islamics: bEsT mAn Of AlL tImE 🤡
Obviously, God wouldn't use a knife like a human. This cutting aorta without cutting it by knife but by internet destruction is so God like.
Also the hadith does not have the words "as if" in the Arabic. Someone added them to the English 👍
So his aorta was cut off right in front of his wife?🤯 You guys are dumb. There are many words in many languages that say 2 worded sentences but when translated in English it adds one or more words to match the grammer of English. If you have no knowledge about Arabic grammer you shouldn't talk about it.
@@wellnahIwillnot If Arabic cannot be properly translated, then we don't need to follow anything that is written in it. Why would God write down a book in a language that most people can't understand?
@@taylenvila3915 lol. Translation also requires to match grammar. Because many languages don't require Auxiliary verbs, some of the prepositions, Article "the" etc. To complete a sentence. In my language when we want to say "He is a boy" we don't add the auxiliary verb "is" and simply just say "He a Boy". See the problem here? We don't translate everything word for word. We need to match the grammar as well. Like I said earlier. Many languages don't use the same grammatical rules as English. Is that so hard to comprehend for you guys? I figured it might because you've probably never spoke another language to know so.
@@wellnahIwillnot So what you're saying is that the book is incomprehensible. I thought it was supposed to make things "clear?" Why couldn't he make a book that everyone understands? Maybe some pictures would have helped so there's no misunderstandings.
Why would they make a book that's so vague and untranslatable?
@@taylenvila3915 So you're basically saying "Why everybody doesn't speak Arabic." and also, A drawing wouldn't also make any sense since a drawing doesn't convey a message. And a language will be incomprehensible to another person who has never spoken that language. Its not just Arabic. If you see older versions of English you won't even be able to recognise many of its words and won't even understand a thing from a person who'd speak 12th century English. So the language isn't actually incomprehensible. Its just that your brain is slow.
Did God really said "challenge accepted" to Muhammad's words in the quran!? 💀
Well He had to.
Not really. He used weak sources and he made up speculations and also didn't provide any sources that support his claims
For the muslims who are confused:
Quran (69:46):
The word "لَقَطَعْنَا" (We would cut) indicates an instant and decisive divine punishment for fabricating lies against Allah.
The term "الوتين" (the aorta) represents the vital lifeline of a human being, and cutting it symbolizes the immediate end of life as a punishment for a grave offense.
Hadith:
The word "انقطاع" (severance) in the hadith reflects a gradual, physiological effect caused by the poison. The Prophet ﷺ is describing the culmination of physical pain over time, linking it to the sensation of his aorta being severed.
Unlike the Quran, this is not a punishment but rather a natural consequence of the poison he had consumed, a sign of his humanity.
I’m getting deja vu from David Wood.
it's the short version
David Wood's also got debunked. and his one is also debunked. Because these are both pure speculations and not actual fact.
Honestly, without the intent of "prove intellectual superiority," anyone that really watch all this content content and be really HONEST with themselves and reflect with all the arguments exposed wouldn't follow Islam anymore.
Not that it is just easy to abandon a believe like this, each people live in a different context of life, but it's worth the thought.
This is just straight-up and concise apologetic content, good job!
Are Christians honest though? Because I used to be and many of us fear to even think about the possibility of being mistaken, not allowing their ideals to be questioned and it becomes blind faith or straight up ignorance, I do know Christians who are still Christians and are honest but not even those are 100% sure of God's character because there's always room for doubt and they admit it
These are easily debunkable Debates. Even this current video is easily debunkable by almost any basic Islamic scholar and someone who knows proper Arabic. the first reason of this debunk would be because He mentioned Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) being sick after consuming lamb meat is false. He was completely healthy for the next years of his life. When 2 weeks before his death the symptoms of Malaria were present when he was sick.
Reason number two would be AL-abhar and Al-wateen aren't the same aortas. Al-Abhar is an aorta which Originates from the head and extends to the feet. AL-wateen is an aorta which is a part of Al-abhar and it originates from the heart and goes upside and creates an arch near the top side of the chest cavity.
When Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) mentioned he felt like his aorta being cut off he stated it with Al-abhar. But in the Qur'an it states as Al-wateen which means it clearly states to cut this specific aorta. while AL-wateen is a specific aorta Al-abhar isn't and it has several more major aorta brnaches. So how can Testify prove that when Prophet Muhammmed(Pbuh) mentioned Al-abhar he mentioned this specific aorta out of every other major aorta under Al-abhar?
The verse in the Qur'an also states that he would be seized him by his right hand. There are no mentions of it throughout his entire video. Even he himself is dishonest and created speculations and presented them as facts. He does that with almost every video he posts.
Always gonna be muslim sorry ! 🤍
0:38 this is the editing we live for
This claim is flawed for a few reasons..
First, the Quran in Surah 69:44-46 talks about a hypothetical scenario where if someone lied about Allah, they would face immediate punishment. It is literally meant to highlight Prophet Muhammad Pbuh truthfulness, not suggest he would actually lie.
Second, when the Prophet described feeling like his "aorta was being severed," it literally is a metaphor. In Arabic, this kind of expression is used to describe extreme pain, not a literal event lmao.
Lastly, the Quran refers to immediate consequences for lying, but the Prophet lived a long life, spreading his message for over 20 years. There is no evidence of any falsehood in his mission.
As a Christian this isn’t a good argument. He’s had a few but not this.
@@imbored6638 hes js desperate
@@imbored6638 ignorance at its finest
@Sayfullah-z8z Your argument only tries to escape the real issue, but it's not a solid argument to falsify the writings of the Quran. In Christianity, divine punishments are also almost not instantaneous, some took months, and some took years, likewise, in the Quran, the statement that if someone lied to Allah then we would cut his Aorta, Allah's made his punishments after years.
as a christian,this can easily be refuted.
This was a natural cause,not divine punishment,bc Allah said he would punish him instead,as its Allah speaking.
yh idk why they put it forward like that, also it was meant to be a sudden death 'severed' and his message would be stopped 'take him by the right hand' physically or in that sense
You think God would use a knife like a human? Also natural is always from God.
You're not a Christian
Testify > Muhammad the 🤥
Keep in mind, I'm a former-Muslim who converted to Christianity. So, when I say these things about Muhammad, I mean them.
@Jason-Alighieri
I'm happy you found the Lord. God bless ✝️☦️
Testify is lying tho he is cherry picking sources and is ignoring the fact that Mohamed’s aorta was not actually cut
People after 1400 years call him liars
But people lived with him called him "al ameen”
@@MetroMan13 Much obliged, brother. God bless you. Merry Christmas 🎄✝️
"´Cutting the Aorta" refers to killing or dying. The whole Hadith says: "...that my Aorta is being cut FROM THIS POISON" saying, that he will die, because of the poison.
Cutting the Aorta in the literal sense, as you said would cause an instant death. The fact that he died over a period of 3 years refutes the argument completely.
It’s not even cut, the word used their means suffocation. He is using wrong interpretation in the first place
Watch the whole video
@IsaiahWagner-jx9kb Ask a Muslim, Quran tells God will make prophet cut his aorta through his hand. It’s like prophet hand will take like a knife and cut it if he were to make a lie, not he will make. Quran talks about this in past suggesting he could have had but make clear in future he will not like in all possible realities left, prophet will not make a lie
Next Hadis means “aorta being suffocated from poison”, he used not as good translation which is “aorta being cut from poison” which is just also an Arabic way of saying “suffocation” and not literal cut
Muslim say : Paul is the worst Person in the world, Muhammad is the best wise man in the world
Muslim be like
Yes he was called as al ameen
Paul be like: I've seen Jesus in a dream, just believe me bro! Also judgment day is within 100 years!
Muhammad be like: the sun has an orbit, the universe is expanding, mountains protect from earthquakes, clouds are heavy, Pharoah's body will be preserved for future generations to see, the people of Abraham worshipped an evening planet and so on.
@@acewing3889 you missing something, Paul's companion saw the lights and they heard Jesus voices
How could that be a Dream?
The funniest thing is, if is a dream then why Paul became Blind 🦯???😂😂😂
Misinterpretation of the Prophet’s Death:
The notion that the Prophet’s death was due to his “aorta being cut” comes from a narration where he described the pain of his illness as resembling that of his aorta being cut (This is a metaphor). The context is his suffering from the poison given to him years earlier by a Jewish woman after the Battle of Khaybar. This was not a divine punishment but a human act of treachery that Allah allowed for wisdoms only He knows.
Allah allowed it to happen, so Allah is to blame. Allah exposed him as being a liar and false teacher.
In Islam, everything that happens is by the will and permission of Allah, but this does not mean Allah is to blame for human choices or actions. Allah grants free will to human beings, allowing them to choose their path, and they are accountable for their actions. This is a test of faith, morality, and sincerity.
If someone lies or teaches falsely, it reflects their personal shortcomings, not Allah’s will for them to err. Allah may allow such situations as a trial or a means to expose truth and guide others. The Qur’an states:
“And say, ‘The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills-let him believe; and whoever wills-let him disbelieve.’” (Qur’an 18:29)
Blaming Allah for the choices and consequences of human actions misunderstands the divine wisdom behind tests and trials in this world. It is better to reflect on the lessons and wisdom such events might bring, and trust in Allah’s ultimate justice and mercy.
@@yusufabdi7682 "He misguides many thereby and guides many thereby. And He misguides not except the defiantly disobedient" (2:26)
Why would Allah ever misguide people or make them go astray? Why doesn't he just guide them to the correct path? Where in the Quran does it say that we have free will?
@@yusufabdi7682 Yes, Muhammad's free will of him was to lie about God and be a fake prophet. So God cut his aorta in God's way, not with a knife, but with internal failure. This is why it feels like that but of course not with a knife like a human. God needs no knife.
@@yusufabdi7682all the christians in the comment section mocking prophet muhammad (PBUH) make my heart ache. Then they say we are the one mocking them. May allah guide them.
I heard about this from David Wood. Nice to see the message getting out!
Today, I learned that Muhammad died in a "What happened to Dorcas?" moment. Literally poisoned mutton.
As a Christian, it doesn't say his right hand was seized
THANK YOU FOR BEING HONEST. God bless
بسم الله والصلاه والسلام على رسول الله
Ok lets first understand what does the quran say
In surah alhaqqa allah (swt)says :
وَلَوْ تَقَوَّلَ عَلَيْنَا بَعْضَ الْأَقَاوِيلِ (44) لَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِينِ (45) ثُمَّ لَقَطَعْنَا مِنْهُ الْوَتِينَ (46)
It means that if the prophet said anything god didn't say and claims it is from god . He will take him with the right (means like in a strong way or extremely hard in arabic) . Then his aorta will be cut
Ok now understand the prophets sayings (hadith)
He said (pbuh):
"فَهَذَا أَوَانُ وَجَدْتُ انْقِطَاعَ أَبْهَرِى"
It is the time that my aorta is being cut in a metaphorical sentence means that is the time to die
So the meanings are completely different from what u say
Now the answer :
1. In the sentence
"لَأَخَذْنَا مِنْهُ بِالْيَمِينِ (45) "
Notice how in arabic the "لأ" means extremely fast and without hesitating so if the prophet lied he would die brutallyand extremely fast by getting his aorta cut but actually he died after 3 years and the revelations were coming down and the miracles were happening
2. Even the Jewish woman became a muslim like how can she poison the prophet for revenge then become muslim
3. If the prophet was a liar he would hide this verse or wouldn't say the hadith but cuz he said it it shows his honesty and high morality
4.the companion " bishr ibn baraa"
Died instantly from eating this lamb like how can he die instantly from a poison and the prophet not unless the prophet had a protection . this means the poison was extremely fatal not in a long term .also she intended to make him die instantly the way she said she wanted to check if he is a prophet or not
5. The lamb talked to the prophet and told him that it is poisonous
That is why only one companion died
And that is how he knew that it was poisonous and told all his friends to not eat from it and brought the woman and asked her why did she put the poison. So it is a confirmed miracle
Next time don't say o Muslims u can't answer this bcuz if not me there are millions who will
Me and u will stand infront of God and we will see who is speaking the truth
hope this gets into the top comments so people can see how shallow this guy's argument is, people just believe anything these days and can't even think for their own.
@@sanlikesicedtea nah,the creator is just replied to the comment he can answer,he ignoring/skip good answer like this
facts
Muhammad’s only prophecy that turned out to be true is that he is a false prophet 😂😂😂
Except it wasn't a prophecy, it was a statement that God couldn't ignore.
@@andrevisser7542 eh, while you’re correct I’ll give them this one win which is actually a loss, or if we take it away for the accurate reasons you gave then all they have are loses. Either way the quran can’t win.
@@ameribeaner, well there are apparently close to 2 billion M uslims that can tell us about Mo's prophecies that came true, wouldn't hold my breath though. 😀
Jesus Christ is the King 👑
Its more as if muhammad tried to warn us in the end that he felt he was a false prophet
Well, the Quran was, in fact, right all along
your Theological Argument?
@HồngTrần-p1j3u I'm talking about the video, how the Quran predicted Muhammad's death
I have used this one and it is awesome. To bad they will run around it by saying I want to know what the scholars say.
It isn't little buddy. Don't run with joy and excitement because you daddy didn't actually put up a good performance against any Muslims. This video is one of the easiest to debunk. I didn't even need like 10 minutes.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL Make a vid debunking it then. I don't care if it's bad. You debunk it I'll remove my comment.
@MyLittleTierList-nz5vo There are some. But I'm gonna write a short Paragraph debunking it.
He mentioned 3 Hadiths that he claims confirm that he was constantly suffering from illness after eating the poisoned lamb. Where none of them actually say anything about Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) suffering after the poison. it was actually a lie and he was completely healthy for over the next 3 years after being poisoned. Sahih Al-Bukhari 4428 Mentions the poison but it was before his death and he was ill with symptoms of Malaria.
He also mentions Al-wateen and Al-abhar being the same aorta which is false.
Al-abhar means, "an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet". Which concludes that Al-abhar is the expression of all the aortas in the human body.
Al-wateen means, "an aorta that generates from the left ventricle and extends upwards and creates and arch near the top chest cavity." which concludes that Al-wateen is a specific Aorta located in the chest cavity.
Linguistically they both mean the same thing. But Al-abhar is broad and Al-wateen is specific. And the Qur'an mentions the specific aorta. While Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) mentioned a broad statement. which means it could be any aorta in his entire body.
When Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) mentions feeling the pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar" Which means it could be any aorta throughout the entire body. How can you prove that he mentioned specifically "Al-wateen". He knew that the aorta in the chest cavity is called Al-wateen then why would he not mention it as Al-wateen?
The Qur'an on the other hand mentions Al-wateen and also mentions that his right hand would be seized. Which means the Qur'an gave criterias that his right hand would be seized and his Al-wateen aorta would be cut off. that means Allah would've cut off this specific aorta of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) and seized him by his right hand. Since none of this criterias meet its clear that this video is just a speculation and nothing more.
@MyLittleTierList-nz5vo don't remove your comment, let that be a pin of shame.
I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that you laid it out in a premise-conclusion form and yet you still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P.
Lemme show you how dumb his logic is:
1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks.
2. The egg is broken
3. Therefore the egg fell down.
See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
Well you may be right but it brings into question Muhammad you are right it is not the best argument against Islam (that would be something like the mean ing behind the old and new testmont prophets names).
U got cooked lil bro 😂
By who anime kid?
@@imbored6638deenresponds
Wonderful, and very informative. Makes me want to read the Quran myself so I can help my friend who’s leaning Islamic
I myself am a Christian, and I'd recommend reading it. Not just for rebuttals, but because it's genuinely an interesting, and hilarious, read. Same reason I advise other Christians to read other religious texts, they're interesting reads, and they help you gain a look on what people of that religion actually think.
How is spreading false informations Informative?? 💀💀
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL I mean if you can disprove any of the claims in the video, then I for one would be more than happy to change my view, as would any intellectual honest person.
@LucienMahikai sure.
I'd request you to read this entire passage to understand more. The video in Question says that Muhammed(pbuh) was constantly suffering pain after being poisoned and referred 3 Hadiths. None of them actually say anything about him being poisoned. Only Sahih Al-Bukhari mentions him feeling as if his aorta was cut off.
He also mentions that both Al-abhar and Al-wateen are the same aorta's. Which isn't true. Al-Abhar is an aorta that originates from the head and extends to the feet. And Al-wateen is and aorta which originates from the left ventricle and creates and arch on the chest cavity. It is connected to Al-abhar. Do they seem the same aortas? For me they aren't.
In the Qur'an it mentions that if Muhammed(pbuh) were to lie his right hand would be seized and his "Al-wateen" aorta would be cut off. So that means Qur'an set a criteria that his right hand would be seized and "Al-wateen" aorta would be cut off. When Muhammed(pbuh) mentions his pain he mentions it as "Al-abhar". So how can the video owner claim that Muhammed(pbuh) mentioned this specific aorta while addressing a general aorta that has several more major aortas. He knows that this specific aorta is called Al-wateen since he is the one who was revealed the verse through. He knows the name of that aorta so why would he not just say Al-wateen?
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL DO you people feel no shame when you bareface lie?
Why does a warning pop up saying "No insults" when top comments are insulting islam?
Basically he only means Disrespecting his personal religion is not allowed but he himself will do it and so will his minions but thats okay Because its not his religion 👍🏽
Sahih al-Bukhari 4428: I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.
"Being cut" suggests his aorta was in the process of being severed from the moment he ate the poison and he revealed this himself as the cause of his death. How they conclude that he "survived" and his death was natural is baffling. He broke the devil's terms and conditions (apostasy law) and paid the price.
Service to the devil for fame and power is always conditional. Mohammed was no stranger to witchcraft and the likes, and supposedly lived under a spell for around 6 months to 1 year. Even that in itself is enough to disqualify any true prophet of God, not to talk of the satanic verses, superstitious beliefs and his "alleged" physical encounter with demons (Sahih Bukhari 3423).
You've just made up terms to seem cool. There are no confirmations in any book that being under a spell disqualifies of someone being a prophet. There are no proof of Satanic verses. those are just speculations to deceive others. There was no "alleged" physical contact with the Jinn A.K.A. demon.
If Allah is all knowing, why would he send a prophet that creates an even bigger religion than Islam...
Check mate Islam.
according to sahih muslim 6666, the sins of muslims are placed onto christians and jews, my theory as to why allah created Christianity in islam is to create a population of sacrificial lambs for muslims
@@BoereViking
1. Because there's something called "free will" because Prophet isa's intention wasn't to claim to be God in the first place,and Instead lead people to the worship of Allah but Christians chose to worship prophet isa instead via their ability to make conscious choices
2. Allah made this world as a test for us so he wouldn't just stop us from making wrong choices,like how a teacher would allow his student to answer incorrectly in his exam but that doesn't mean he didn't give the answers while he was teaching them
@@Careless555 1. The first Christians were worshipping Jesus. Everyone around him understood that he was making a divine claim. He would've said otherwise, had it been false. He would've rejected the worship he had been receiving like the angels and OTHER prophets had. Do you know of any other legitimate sinless prophet who forgave sins? Because I don't. 2. The only problem, and Testify has demonstrated it on his channel, is that Muhummad was clearly still making the wrong choices, even with a "sinless prophet" claim. Allah would've sent Muhummad 600 years later after Jesus and all of the things he did, so that would make Allah a liar, which is a sin. You saying God can sin? that's ludicrous.
@LeoAnimationsTMNT
1. Can you give evidence to justify your claim of Christians at that time worshipping Jesus and him claiming to be God without appealing to the bible which contains logical contradictions (formally logical ones) and the concept of the Trinity which either violates the law of identity or leads to polytheism,so I don't think the statement of Jesus claiming to be divine has a sufficient and well constructed ground for it's truth since its based using the bible
2. How did prophet muhammad sin? Because if you are talking about his marriage with Aisha then let me tell you:in the old Arabian lands they begin to measure a girl's age when she reaches puberty so a girl who is 1 year old by their standards is 10 years old chronologically,meaning that Aisha should be at least 19 year and that means that prophet Muhammad pbuh did not commit a sin,also that's a complete non sequitur since nothing in the premise of Jesus being sinless indicates that there would be no prophet after him
@Careless555 without the Bible? Sure. We have the Mogiddo Mosaic and Pliny the Younger reaffirming the worshipping and deity of Christ, and that's just off the top of my head. If Jesus were to claim to be God, that would make it a biblical text, would it not? And, what's your evidence of these "logical contradictions?" Or is this just a way to prevent the Bible from being used? Smart play on your end. Is the fact that he's claimed divine titles, received worship, and forgave sins not convincing enough for you? Also, the idea you seem to have on the Trinity being polytheism just tells me you don't actually know what the Trinity is, and that's fine, because Allah didn't either. He claimed it was made up God, Jesus, and Mary, something no doctrine of Christianity believes. Just sounds like an uneducated Arab claiming to be Allah. 2. This accepts the premise that marrying and having sex with a minor ISN'T a sin. Sin doesn't change based on the time periods it was done in, and the claim is that Islam is timeless. So, are you saying that having sex with a 9 year old isn't wrong? (Also, I don't even have to talk about that, because we can talk about his sex slaves and/or his pillaging of tribes that wasn't an act of self defense, but as a "spread by the sword" tactic.)
I guess we can still call him a prophet. His prophecy was what would happen if he was ousted as a liar and it was fulfilled.
Can't call that a prophecy though, he made a statement that our true Creator couldn't ignore.
This is absolutely insane
it isn't little fella. Even David woods detailed explanation was debunked. he just makes shorter versions of them.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOLthere we go!
I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that he laid it out in a premise-conclusion form but still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P.
Lemme show you how dumb his logic is:
1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks.
2. The egg is broken
3. Therefore the egg fell down.
See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
Pls keep posting on spotify😢
LOVE the Minecraft death sound bytes 😅 (OOF)
The Quran basically says the thing people say when they want to be believed. AKA “May lightning strike me if I am lying!” The Hadiths say Momo complained the pain he experienced in his last days was like the pain he would receive if he made stuff up. It would be like the person who said the lightning statement dying from electrocution.
So you're saying this poison had given Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) Symptoms of Malaria after 3 years? Nice joke. You guys should make a comedy club and make us laugh.
2:29 prophet companions died immediately after consuming this poison but it took three years for the poison to kill the prophet???
yeah a slow painful death where the Quran says he'd die just like a false prophet doesn't count.
@@TestifyApologetics Which verse exactly says that a false prophet would die a slow and painful Death? Your lies are massively unbelievable. You present speculations like they're facts.
@@TestifyApologetics IT ACTUALLY WAS SUPPOSED TO BE INSTANT oh my GOD i hate LIARS like YOU
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOLthe literal verse he quote
It’s even worse than that! According to David Wood, the words “as if“ aren’t even in the Arabic of the passage. The translators added that.
So his aorta was cut off in front of his wife then? right?
As a Muslim, I will mention that I am only educated as much as my lord has decreed.
But you cannot just say it is not a coincidence becuase I said so.
If his aorta was being cut it doesnt directly indicate it was as he was a false prophet.
So if u say let God strike u with lightning if u l ie and it does, I would think it prove u l i e d...
Oh Allah give them Hidayah!
Before we even start, we can see that different words are used (Wateen in the Quran) and (Ahbar in the Hadith). Ahbar is a general term for the main vein in the body of which the aorta is part of (which is why it is translated such sometimes). Wateen is always Aorta, Ahbar doesn't necessarily mean aorta.
And you proceeded to make the same stupid argument which is debunked in this video
Repent and trust in Christ for salvation or you will be damned along with your false prophet
@@ScribeAlicious we'll see on the day of judgement..
this hadith is a suspended hadith
The suspended hadith is one of the types of weak hadith (returned); Because it lacked one of the conditions for acceptance, which is the continuity of the chain of transmission. The deleted narrator is unknown, and his condition and degree of control are not known.
Sahih al-Bukhari is the first hadith collection of the Six Books of Sunni Islam. Compiled by Islamic scholar al-Bukhari in the musannaf format, the work is valued by Muslims, alongside Sahih Muslim, as the most authentic after the Qur'an.
So are you claiming the more useful Hadiths Important for Muslims, is a weak Hadiths according to you ???
@@roginyappl7158 Muslim shuffle 😂 even when you quote the literal words from the Quran or strongest Hadiths they still find excuses
@@roginyappl7158 see here the problem Quran never say be Sunni Muslim or be Shea Muslim or Sufi those are words of man. Quran say be Muslim the end.
the definition of Muslim: Submission to God. the only book is saved form distorted is the Quran and the only Sunna or hadith is saved from distorted is Practical ٍٍSunna
Buhahhaa,so it’s now a suspended Hadith ?how soon will the Quran be suspended…the author is literally known but still you want to deny it 😂😂😂😂
@@fluxnekta this is how muslims escape from arguments. Either they say it's suspended hadith or you have misinterpreted the hadith. Yet they keep claiming their book and believes are unchangeable 😂
I'm an atheist but this is a crappy argument. It's unfortunate that you laid it out in a premise-conclusion form but still failed to see the basic logical fallacy: basically if P entails Q, that doesn't need to imply that Q entails P.
Lemme show you how dumb your logic is:
1. If an egg falls down, the egg breaks.
2. The egg is broken
3. Therefore the egg fell down.
See the problem, kiddo?, the egg could've been broken due to many other reasons, for example a chick 🐣 coming out of it 🤦♂️
Yes, word used in Hadis is actually an old translation of Quran which is not accepted by scholars now a days. Most closest translation in English is prophet said that he is dying by suffocation or shortness of breath
He didn’t said cut by aorta, and neither prophet aorta was cut anyway either.
And the verse he mention is saying if prophet did it that prophet will do it before but it doesn’t say anything about future as Allah knows future and know there is no possibility of prophet ever lying but it’s just if prophet lied, that’s what will happen to him!
@@AbdulRehman-o7q7w oh I see... Thanks for letting me know!
Also, slavery isn’t encouraged in islam, it’s discouraged unlike in their own faith.
Also, our “slavery” is because slavery ended like 200 years ago and in prophet time, there was whole system of slavery
When Disbelievers killed Muslims and forced war on us, we defeated them and took their lands and prophet never stole anything from any land infact those people money were used back on them
Also, rules on war were, not to kill children, women, elder, sick, anyone who surrenders, and not to destroy places of worship of people or places of living or crops and not to kill animals and cut trees for no reasons ( animals and trees only )
When we conqueror, their kings used to have massive number of slaves including many women, male slaves still could earn money some way, these slaves didn’t had any money, food, place to live and in past, they were just left to die
So, these slaves in islam are only “existing slaves taken as prisoners of war”, these slaves were given to a Muslim family and person that is owner, same gender one are brothers and sister of each other and opposite genders are equal ( almost ) as your wife or husbands
So, we treat slave as brother, or for me a wife but now there are no slave existing
Freeing a slave is one of biggest good deeds
Why islam allows sex with slaves and don’t consider it adultery? It’s because slaves do have sexual desires and they will do adultery which punishment is 100 lashes if 4 witnesses are and it gets popular else just ask God for mercy because if people know, it spread corruption in land. If you are sincere, you may not even be punished, and lashes can be like very low chances to be implied as people accept their mistakes and ask for forgiveness and forgiveness is given as Allah can forgive all sins
Why Muslim didn’t freed them? It’s because same thing, women slave can’t earn in past, no place to live in Muslim families either because it’s haram! I mean, they will need to create their own house inside a house or marry someone and as a slave, they are already are wife or brother or sister or husband of owner
Can’t you see, I mean, if I ask a Christian a question in Bible, he literally tells look in Quran and it’s not even in Quran and if it is, the definition like “slavery” they have doesn’t exist in Islamic definition of “slavery”. We don’t consider their genocidal slavery as Right and we consider our family related slavery as Right because it’s a step and your son isn’t a slave either and prophet also had a slave called Maria and prophet had child with her and later there is saying that prophet married her! Why? It’s because it’s allowed and she is consider almost as wife of prophet
@@SqueakyPhilosopher I searched modern translation of Arabic, word means “suffocation” not “cut with poison” -> Which doesn’t mean cut literally
Also, Quran said “We will cut from him [his] the aorta”,Means, prophet Muhammad himself will cut his aorta which didn’t happened
I am devout Christian but if his aorta really was cut he would die asap. What is a response to this?
He felt pain in his aorta of it slowly getting cut off. The poision was a slow killer and it killed him after a few years by fully chopping of the aorta.
@@nicanorfredricksbirdrealm228 that isnt how it works so uuhhh do research next time before believing everything testify says
@laithhz In the Hadith Muhammad said the poison was cutting his aorta either the poison killed him or Muhammad is lieing
Testify didn’t make the argument he just explained it. The argument had existed for many years.
Poision like Arsenic can take years to kill.
I heard that muslims did not want to bury him 3 days after he died thinking he would ressurect. Is there a source for that?
No.
Cope harder@@Diff-q
Amazing work as usual keep on doing Gods purpose which is to reveal the truth and show all the lies and deception with these fake prophets and fake religions. JESUS CHRIST IS LORD AND KING! ✝️👑🕊️🙏🏼❤️🔥
There's even more that wasnt brought to main attention. The woman who poisoned him said "If he is a prophet, he will be informed; but if he is only a king, we will get rid of him" He was not warned and was gotten rid of, therefore Muhammed is not a prophet.
What is the chant that you use when you talk about Christianity? It sounds really cool
The line "Muhammad felt as though his aorta was being cut," has added to. He says, in the original translation states that his aorta was being cut. Not that he thought it was or it felt like it was.
Muhammad confirmed the curse of a false prophet is to have the aorta cut and he confirmed that it was cut.
now that's something Muhammad wrote something down to seem trustworthy but God noticed and accepted his challenge 😂😂
Amen! Vengeance is His to repay!
Muhammad: Jesus was not the lamb of sacrifice and nor was he the son of God!
*Lamb:what did you say?*
Muslims coping and seething rn
I hope many a many mewslems see this and consider following muhmad's footsteps.
If u have some iq u can actually debunk these videos lol
How come eating 7 dates didn’t save muhammad lol
Bruh. Read the Hadith properly. And also there are no certain proofs that he died of poisoning. these are just speculations.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he was very sick that he kept fainting according Sunan Ibn Majah 1234. Then he mentioned he was dying from sickness according to Sahih Al bukhari 4428 he mentioned the poison.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL @ he suffered for years from the poison until he died from it. My aorta has been cut. Choosing same words in Quran 69:44-46. False prophet.
Well if Muhammad was fake then he should know about Judaism and Christianity and as he accepts Jesus as a prophet who didnt he teach Christianity instead?
Because he made it up. What is this argument?
This is _you need to look at the arabic._ Because the "aorta" used in the Qur'an is totally different than the "aorta" in the Hadith, so it was talking about two different body part.
Also, poison was super lethal, the friend that also eat the poison instantly died but Muhammad didn't.
Did you not watch the video?
People’s anatomy may react differently as well. One medication may work on me and not on you.
@@Auriel4 really? It took 4 years for thr instant death cyanide to finally work its magic?
Also, there is another part of the Qur'an that didn't get mention. "We would have _seized him by the right hand._ Then We would have cut from him the aorta."
His right hand was never seized.
@Auriel4 really? It took 4 years for thr instant death cyanide to finally work its magic?
Also, there is another part of the Qur'an that didn't get mention. "We would have seized him by the right hand." His right hand was never seized.
@@Auriel4well not for a poison which is supposed to be a instant death
Even with different anatomy a poison like that can take maximum a few days or weeks to finish off the job
If they both received the same dose how was one able to die instantly while the other survived for 3 years
I love how he keeps talking about stuff THAT'S ADDRESSED IN THE VIDEO LOL
Does this part: “we would seize him by the right hand” matter to the story at all?
I didn't see you addressing this part of the prophecy
i heard they(early muslim at the time) not let him bury in THREE days in hopes he will come back alive like Jesus Christ did
Lmao
You just spread a fake rumor. It was delayed because they wanted to decide who would be the next Caliphe. as it was a cruicial time when decision makings would be big.
@@heuz8431 It's a fake rumor. You just go scammed by someone who didn't even provide his source of this information.
Nope they did not, Abu bakr said Muhammad was a human and Allah said in Quran that prophets have passed before them and So he will pass away as well, And no muslims do not believe Jesus “came back alive” as we believe he never died in the first place that’s Ahmadis the heretics, early muslims believed Jesus did dissapear for a few days but then started appearing to Mary Magdelene and others etc,
what kinda lie is this bruh this is why misinformation is reportable in TH-cam
Also Aisha, wrote much of this aorta.but couldn't tell he was a false prophet
In aya 46 , you have the word (الوتين) which means the aurta right, no , it's a tendon called the Attachments of the heart , not an artery ,and thank you 🙂
Edit: Sorry guys I made a mistake, الوتين ، is not a tendon, its a vain , and it also proves our Christian guy wrong 🙂
Hey, one question I have for you. Which denomination do you believe in? Are you Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Presbyterian etc. I'm really curious :)
2000 views 500 likes less than one hour ☦️💯
In Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 the AS IF was added by taqiyya to have the reader thinking MAYBE was.
This is awesome
Nah it's faulty logic, can you spot the biconditional error he makes?
@@SqueakyPhilosopherall the comments are literally christians who are mocking and disrespecting prophet muhammad. Then they say muslim disrespect christians. Baffles and saddens me
Go Dude you tell em 😎
☦️
Sunan Ibn Majah 1234, Muhammad suffered years and kept fainting from his sickness due to the poison.
lol. He kept fainting during his final days. He didn't keep fainting and waking up for 3 years lmao.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he suffered from the poison for years and the fainting was one of the signs until his last day and he used same words my aorta as in Quran 69:44-46
@@samsam-nx8gq Nope he didn't. he used Al-abhar which is an aorta that starts from the head and extends to the feet. Whike the Qur'an states Al-wateen which is an aorta that starts from the left ventricle of the heart and forms an arch near the chest cavity. Al-wateen is a part of Al-abhar but not exactly Al-abhar as Al-abhar has several more major aortas like Al wateen. Which means the Qur'an states a specific aorta to fullfil the criteria of his death if he were to lie about the Qur'an. And the Verses also state that he would be seized by his right hand which also didn't happen. And he also didn't die because his aorta was cut off. If it were to happen it would've been called inernal bleeding instead of death because of sickness. He wasn't suffering from any of the effects of the poison. He was sick with symptoms of Malaria during his last days.
@ sounds like saying my bed room is not part of my house lol. A damage at any part of the vein will cause the suffering. I never heard he died from malaria so provide me the reference of Malaria.
@@OPtimusPrimeXFUTBOL he did, sounds like saying my bed room is not part of my house lol. A damage at any part of the vein will cause the suffering. I never hereafter if him having malaria so provide me the reference of Malaria.
Christ is King ✝️
This is a self refuting argument, because you have to believe in the Quran to make it.
@@tea5411yes that is why it is a self refuting argument
@@tea5411yes that is why it is a self refuting argument.
@@krii2fly word used their means suffocation, and Quran talks about past and prophet aorta wasn’t cut either
He used wrong interpretation and you all followed “Joker L edition 2024 yakk “
God may curse all the lairs
Bro cassualy debunked a whole religion
@lorez_craffyy not really the entire thing but he did make a good argument
U guys think he done😭😭😭just research and see how weak his arguments are😭😭
to dumb bible bashers for sure
@@mohamedzaul-f2knope. His argument is faulty. Can you spot the biconditional logical error he makes?
@@Dinobs8089 if its weak why dont u have an argument against it?😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
I had an argument with a believer who was claiming Momo was peaceful with other religions. My question was, wasn't he poisoned by a jew woman whose family was slaughtered by Momo. And this guy's reply was like : The jew woman offered him meat which was on a feast organized between jews and Muslims which is contradicting your claim that Momo was massacring jews!! 😂
Well he was. And I guess your buttery smooth brain didn't do his research. Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) was in truce with the Jews when one of the Jewish tribe Banu Nadir decided to try and kill Prophet Muhammed(pbuh). they were expelled from Medina. After which they tried to continue their hostile activities towards Muslims which led to the battle of khaybar. After which Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) was poisoned by the Jewish women who also happened to kill one of his companions named Bishr with the poison. and his family decided to execute her. Which has nothing to do with Muhammed. Is it enough or do I have to provide sources for you?