Today is Feb 12, 2024. I watched the video talking about the climate change. During this time, I just passed three questions mentioned in the video. First question: What is the climate change? Climate change is about the heat being added to the Earth system. Human activities like burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests that have been standing for hundreds of thousands of years create carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. The more greenhouse gas you have in the atmosphere, the more of the sun's heat get trapped in the atmosphere and the warmer the surface gets and that's why it's called greenhouse effect. 2. What are greenhouse gases? Greenhouse gases exist naturally in the atmosphere. If there's no greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the world would be too cold for comfort. Greenhouse gases on their own are actually great. It helps to insulate the Earth. The problems we are facing now is the numerous of greenhouse gases being added to the Earth. 3. What are fossil fuels? All of the systems that underpin our lives. So how we produce food to eat, how we create energy to heat our homes, how we create electricity to power our devices, how we fuel our cars. For the most part, historically, we burn fossil fuels to produce energy. Fossil fuels are essentially from plants and animals from millions of years ago. We burn fossil fuels to create heat and electricity and everything. But then we also produce carbon dioxide as a side effect.
User, that is simplistic. Co2 which most consider the most powerful actually decreases in potency as it's concentration increase on a logarithmic scale. H2O is actually far more potent and has very much more influence. That said every action has a reaction and increasing temperature increases water evaporation which is cooling. There are many other reactions which doesn't follow the more CO2 equals more heating, it's much more complex. The sun is not considered by the IPCC but it too is variable.
Love this podcast! :) I like everything, the topic, how the interview goes, and the subtitles. I wish I had known it before, although I've been watching BBC but didn't explore this in the past. I have been listening to different podcasts, this one is the best! Wish we could have more of this informative topics! :) I'll keep this on my regular routine! 🙂🙂
Hey ppls, I'm 19 yrs old engaged in my studies but at the same time I am taking care of my mother nature by planting tress and looking after for it. It's our job to save our planet, you ought to do same.......
Climate change is not "turbocharging weather events". The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising! There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6? "There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions." "There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions." "Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)." There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
Are you trying to prove climate change is natural? Heres three reasons why climate change is mostly caused by human works : My first point : Yes ,climate change can happen naturally, like in the sun , but temperature on Earth is increasing more rapidly , maybe even faster than the Sun. Human works , like different diamond or gold mines produce methane when the soil is dug up and that methane gas rises to the air , reflecting sunlight from the sun more , creating what is called a greenhouse effect , heating up the planet faster , increasing the temperature at least by 1 degrees Celsius by 2025 . My second point : Factories produce different chemicals like mercury , plastics , petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and even excess gunpowder, and a wide variety of different chemicals, killing off the plants in the water and other marine animals , making the levels of photosynthesis decrease rapidly and causing carbon dioxide emissions to drastically increase while oxygen levels would plummet, warming up the surroundings as a result , along with other greenhouse gases that are also produced. My third point : Electrical appliances, such as fridges , produce excessive chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or hydrochlorofluorocarbons , which deplete the ozone layer , heating up the climate . My fourth point : Trees in the Amazon forest the size of two football fields are being cut down every hour , and since trees help absorb carbon dioxide and other harmful chemicals, when they are cut down , they release a huge amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, causing the temperatures to warm up . My fifth reason: Nuclear power plants which generate electricity through nuclear fission also produce greenhouse gas emissions, and creates nuclear waste , which , in turn to store them , we need to cut down an estimated 2120 trees by 2026 to supply enough space for the nuclear waste , which in turn create more carbon dioxide, warming up the climate. My sixth point : The domestication of livestock are rapidly increasing, and farmers , in turn burn down more trees to supply more space , creating the haze epidemics ( 2018 -2019) in Indonesia, India and even China. On top of that , farmers try to feed their livestock as much as possible, creating more emitting of greenhouse gases (farts and burps ) which in turn warm up the surroundings even more ! My seventh point : Cars that run on gasoline create even more greenhouse emissions by chemical reactions in their engines , releasing carbon monoxide, methane , and most importantly, carbon dioxide. My eighth point : As more gasoline is used up , more fossil fuels are dip up and burnt , creating carbon dioxide, hydroxide , and much more chemicals, creating more greenhouse emissions by everything put together .
My addition to my fifth point : nuclear power plants can also produce greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide ( poisonous chemical, created by burning sulfur )and other stuff that also warm up the surroundings
Plus , how about the super cyclone that hit the eastern coast of New York City ? Your “evidence” of the matter seems outdated from 2019 . The cyclone was caused by - you guessed it- climate change , which is why the 1 billion oyster program was created to restore the city’s carbon footprint. How about the melting of global ice caps ? The world loses about ten metric tons of ice per year! That is about the weight of 400 elephants of ice ! How is that not caused by human activity? How about the Australian wildfires in 2019 ? This disaster was one of the largest wildfires in the world since the 2000s ! How about increasing change in rainfall patterns? Ever since humans first began to increase the greenhouse gas emissions, different floods are happening around the globe, and have you heard that Ireland is about to sink by 2190 ?
@@yaluo5648 My first point : First point. Temperature on Earth is not increasing. "Ice hockey stick" happened to be a scam. Check climategate story. My second point : Oxygen is produced via photosynthesis. Photosynthesis needs carbon. If you want to have more trees and plants - YOU HAVE TO BURN THE COAL No carbon dioxide - no plants. My third point : Ozone layer is not depleted and it is in fact OK. Are we talking about Ozone layer or climate change? My fourth point : Carbon dioxide is not a harmful chemical. It is produced in your body. Actually trees are not a major contributor to photosynthesis. It is sea plankton who is. My fifth reason: Nuclear power plant producing "gas emissions" - is just a pure lie. My sixth point : What is your proposal? Stop cows to fart? In the past huge bison herds were roving plains. What is your plan to stop them farting? My seventh point : Cargon dioxide is produced by any animal, including human being. My eighth point : Burinig coal is a good thing. Now coal is trapped by coal. We return carbon where it belongs - trees.
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment. He let an infrared beam pass through a tube filled with CO2 and measured the emerging light intensity. Upon reducing CO2 concentration in the tube, only a tiny difference could be found and he concluded that very few CO2 molecules are enough to completely absorb the IR beam. The conclusion was that a CO2 increase could not matter.
"More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment." That's laughable. Such a lab test cannot replicate how the real complex world of climate works, and more than a century later, THOUSANDS of much better research studies proves that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900 and that the climate crisis is lethal and urgent. Take care.
Maximum 2 children policy for every country would have an immediate positive impact on global warming, migrationresources, employment etc. But corporation likebbc of course wouldn't discuss the source of problem...We are human, we all consume and therefore have an impact on everything from A to Z. I don't take anyone who lectures me on global warming seriously without first addressing the issue with global over population.
Just seen a BBC reporter in the south of the UK. Talking about global warming, with a hooded jacket and 3 other layers of thick fleeces. What a frarce. The major flooding in Dubia was caused by cloud seeding. In the Vietnam war America used cloud seeding. Cloud seeding technology has moved on a lot. I would not be surprised if this was not used now. All the new housing projects not one new reservoir.
What happened in dubai was not a cause of cloud seeding missions since immediately preceeding the flood there were no cloud seeding mission flown and also there have been many cloud seeding missions that have been flown and are being flown rioght now yet we havn't seen another flood on that scale anywhere
One thing I notice about climate videos is they're too wonky and academic for regular people to take this issue seriously. It's always framed as either gloom and doom or a fun educational adventure. Nothing showing how an earth on fire will affect people's practical lives.
Because it is quite gloom and doom if you want to be honest. Scienctific facts don’t give a shit about your feelings to be true. We’d accept it and act quickly or suffer the consequences
So why do the BBC keep sending thier presenters 1st class for a 4 min clip on some stupid, "and finally" news article and then tell OAPs, to turn down the heating an switch off the plug when they are cauing so many emissions and the poor OAP ends up in hospital with pneumonia?
@@thanhnguyensolo😂😂😂 Keep going, I love to watch stupidity at work in climate change people lol. You people make me laugh so hard hearing how you actually believe the crap your spewing even though it a load of 💩 and not true. Some on my side want you to shut up but not me, I love comic relief. To see just how dumb and gullible you are!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Climate change refers to? long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns? Human activities are not the main driver of what we have termed, climate change. Recognising that the sun is the main contributor to our temperatures is important. It has absolutely nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas. Sun storms are correlative with the current causes of our temperature fluctuations. The 'deserts' and 'sea levels' however, 'they' indeed have been created, by mankind. Jean-François Bastin, interesting question "What if there were 1 trillion more trees?" Understandably, just how many trees do you think they are currently cutting down? So you know, 'People cut down 15 billion trees each year, on one global tree count'. United, the deforestation, estimated 46% since the beginning of human civilization. So his question, is to more than double the just over 400 billion trees on the planet. (:It would be 1.4 Trillion trees, keep in mind 800 billion estimated, before mankind;)
Actually, the research shows that the Earth has rapidly warmed while the sun's output has dimmed a notch and that ~98% of all global warming since 1900 was caused by our emissions.
Of course back in the 19th century rivers & lakes use to freeze over in the winter & there were even makets held on the Thames & Matt Taylor of the BBC said it was caused by low sun activity for years but in the last 20 years there has been high activity by the sun, does any body not think that may have something to do with climate change? Of course there have also been over 2000 nuclear bomb test since the WW2 with over 500 emitted into the atmosphere. All of these things have made differences to the worlds climate & I sincerely believe that all that radiation has caused one in two people now getting cancer.
So why if OAP's are told to turn down the heating, to walk intead taking the car, Yet they send people they employ for a 5 min clip 1st class, with film crew, go to every sporting stage, and take all thier staff, Balding Linekar, Myrie, Rita, Chakroborty, Anita Rani,Hariry bikers, Rick Stien, Vicky Young, Sarah Smith, Nadia Huessian, Anju Adnam.
On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C. Today is 4th July 2024. Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks.
"On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C. Today is 4th July 2024. Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons. Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks." I believe that you are sincere, but you are confusing local and short-term WEATHER on the one hand with AVERAGE GLOBAL CLIMATE on the other hand. The heat on Earth is always unevenly distributed, so man-made global warming doesn't mean that every July 4 will be hotter than every other July day in previous years--that's not how it works. We will even still set record daily cold temps in various places, but the GLOBAL AVERAGE is getting warmer, including the long-term average for the UK. So don'y be confused by random short-term weather fluctuations: The climate crisis is real, lethal, urgent, and we caused it... and it's getting worse every decade.
Climate change refers to the long-term changes in weather patterns that are observed across different regions of the Earth. These changes are primarily driven by human activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences. activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences.
Weather patterns remain the same. Weather is not effected by human activity. Sea level is not rising and glaciers are not melting. Storms and hurricanes are pretty much at the same level as hundred years ago. And ... one more thing. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
@@markluxon5044 Yes you right! And even more. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc. Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs. Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
What are suggesting? Abortion? Murder? I think a safer and more agreeable choice for the world would be to reduce the utility of our nonrenewable sources but not so drastically that we can't use our daily services that are run on nonrenewable energy.
@@renzo6490 But even with that in mind, it's not the most easiest way out of our global issue. Imagine how upset people would get if the government restricts everyone to have fewer children then what they'd hope? Sure that could help the environment but would it truly be agreeable to the people? Activists tend to have unrealistic ideas and this is probably one of them.
After the energy crises of the 1970s we statarted the intensive use of energy and in global characterised the era of industrialisation. Future moves in direction we reguire! For instance many European countries during the last few decades uses the hot water traditionally to supply energy. Low enthalpy sources for heating offer various spectrum of applications. It is time for all of us to prevent it with renewable energy sources!
Today is Feb 17, 2024. 1. Why is the Earth getting warmer considered as a global issue? Some people will be thinking I like hot weather. What's wrong with it? Some parts of the word are already pretty hot. If you are in a particularly hot city and that suddenly gets a chunk hotter, that's going to make it a lot harder to live in that city. Beyond that, around the world, we have seen first-hand the effects of the world getting warmer. Climate change is turbocharging all sorts of extreme weather events like heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires. 2. How do the climate change cause floods and? That seems to be the opposite of what some people have thought would happen. Warm water takes up more spaces than cold water. And so, you get this thing called thermal expansion. Sea level rising is due to the amount of the warm water in the sea. Besides that, hot atmosphere causes ice sheets to melt, not just melt from the top down, but also to flow faster into the ocean. We 've already seen a huge increase in the rate of ice loss. Some parts of the word are also experiencing more drought as more water gets carried away from those areas,
@imtheeastgermanguy5431 No they don't. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising! There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6? "There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions." "There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions." "Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)." There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
I do think that what you guys saying is just preposterously ridiculous because in my city the impacts of climate change are quite visible it caused to rise in cancer and other respiratory disease
@rawazardalan2288 I am uncertain of your location and how a small increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere results in an increase in cancer rates in just your area. There are, however, lots of positive effects associated with climate change. There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%! Climate change saved 555,103 lives in England and Wales between 2001 and 2020 (ONS, 2022). There are over 5 million excess deaths per annum globally due to abnormal temperatures from the 2000-2019 study led Prof. Guo of Monash University. It found that over 90% of excess deaths were caused by excess COLD rather than excess heat. This applied globally including in the hottest continent, Africa. So, in a world with increasingly mild temperatures, there will be less excess death. Warming is good not bad. One of the main causes of death in the poorer parts of the world is attributable to air pollution. This is because they have to burn wood and dung over open fires for cooking and heating in their homes. These people need access to gas stoves and electricity to improve their health and life expectancy. They need fossil fuels to make them healthy and wealthy.
The temperature of the earth is increasing we started using climate change because its a more accurate description of the phenomenon previously known as global warming. The earth is warming and this warming will have a multitude of effects which in some circumstances can cause all sorts of things like more precipitation but also more drought, more heat but also more cold and can increase the frequency and magnitude of natural disasters. Now you see why we call it climate change
Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels. TH-cam Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy. Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT. Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses. It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are.
there will be signs in the sun moon and stars, on earth nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea, ( luke 21v 25 )
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc. Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs. Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
Well I am intelligent enough to know that Climate Change is a SCAM. That's why they stop using "Global Warming" What can effects our weather ? Look up HAARP. !
@@geob8172 Do you deny current atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are over 30% higher than they were about 150 years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution and in the same time span the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming?
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Today is Feb 12, 2024. I watched the video talking about the climate change. During this time, I just passed three questions mentioned in the video.
First question: What is the climate change?
Climate change is about the heat being added to the Earth system. Human activities like burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests that have been standing for hundreds of thousands of years create carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. The more greenhouse gas you have in the atmosphere, the more of the sun's heat get trapped in the atmosphere and the warmer the surface gets and that's why it's called greenhouse effect.
2. What are greenhouse gases?
Greenhouse gases exist naturally in the atmosphere. If there's no greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the world would be too cold for comfort. Greenhouse gases on their own are actually great. It helps to insulate the Earth. The problems we are facing now is the numerous of greenhouse gases being added to the Earth.
3. What are fossil fuels?
All of the systems that underpin our lives. So how we produce food to eat, how we create energy to heat our homes, how we create electricity to power our devices, how we fuel our cars. For the most part, historically, we burn fossil fuels to produce energy. Fossil fuels are essentially from plants and animals from millions of years ago. We burn fossil fuels to create heat and electricity and everything. But then we also produce carbon dioxide as a side effect.
is this for geography homework or something lol
@@thecatgod31 at least hes educating people
@@allayna1688 ok
User, that is simplistic.
Co2 which most consider the most powerful actually decreases in potency as it's concentration increase on a logarithmic scale. H2O is actually far more potent and has very much more influence.
That said every action has a reaction and increasing temperature increases water evaporation which is cooling. There are many other reactions which doesn't follow the more CO2 equals more heating, it's much more complex.
The sun is not considered by the IPCC but it too is variable.
i only got the first question but thanks
Love this podcast! :) I like everything, the topic, how the interview goes, and the subtitles. I wish I had known it before, although I've been watching BBC but didn't explore this in the past. I have been listening to different podcasts, this one is the best! Wish we could have more of this informative topics! :) I'll keep this on my regular routine! 🙂🙂
Please bring back this podcast
I am an electric engineering statement and I do believe that there is a permanent source for producing electricity❤
I am not watching it for school. I am actually a nature lover and concerned about climate change.
What is the first and foremost step that industrial nations take towards climate change?
Hey ppls, I'm 19 yrs old engaged in my studies but at the same time I am taking care of my mother nature by planting tress and looking after for it.
It's our job to save our planet, you ought to do same.......
This is true , we just need to adapted the life about the climate change.the cutting down trees along the forests is the most impact on climate change
I just love this episode and topic on which the whole vidoes are talked.. There is a still hope to control the adverse effects of climate changes.
Winter frost patterns retreating from valleys to mountains in pakistan. Paddy and maize yields falling for hybrid seds. How to reverse it
Good job thank you 👍🏼
I will tell you what climate change is It is something to say when politicians want to change the subject they do it all time
Thank you
It must be wonderful to live in such a simple world
@CH-et4go Yes you are right it is a simple world!!! It's people like you who complicate it!!
@CH-et4go guess it is a simple world!!! People like you complicate it
Ok
@@rodmartin-nl8ns reality is complicated.
thanks
Is electricitic cars and scooters cutting the cost of transportation to half in
Tropical countries?
Climate change is not "turbocharging weather events".
The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change:
Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution.
increased lightning: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution.
There is no climate crisis.
The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change:
Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments
Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution.
Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend
(14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence).
Ecological Drought as above.
Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend.
43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence).
So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising!
There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis.
The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed:
Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions),
Aridity,
Avalanche (snow),
Average precipitation,
Average Wind Speed,
Coastal Flood,
Agricultural drought,
Hydrological drought,
Erosion of Coastlines,
Fire Weather (hot and windy),
Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods),
Frost,
Hail,
Heavy Rain,
Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms,
Landslides,
Marine Heatwaves,
Ocean Acidity,
Radiation at the Earth’s Surface,
River/Lake Floods,
Sand and Dust Storms,
Sea Level,
Severe Wind Storms,
Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets,
Tropical Cyclones.
How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6?
"There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions."
"There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions."
"Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)."
There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
Are you trying to prove climate change is natural?
Heres three reasons why climate change is mostly caused by human works :
My first point :
Yes ,climate change can happen naturally, like in the sun , but temperature on Earth is increasing more rapidly , maybe even faster than the Sun. Human works , like different diamond or gold mines produce methane when the soil is dug up and that methane gas rises to the air , reflecting sunlight from the sun more , creating what is called a greenhouse effect , heating up the planet faster , increasing the temperature at least by 1 degrees Celsius by 2025 .
My second point :
Factories produce different chemicals like mercury , plastics , petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and even excess gunpowder, and a wide variety of different chemicals, killing off the plants in the water and other marine animals , making the levels of photosynthesis decrease rapidly and causing carbon dioxide emissions to drastically increase while oxygen levels would plummet, warming up the surroundings as a result , along with other greenhouse gases that are also produced.
My third point :
Electrical appliances, such as fridges , produce excessive chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or hydrochlorofluorocarbons , which deplete the ozone layer , heating up the climate .
My fourth point :
Trees in the Amazon forest the size of two football fields are being cut down every hour , and since trees help absorb carbon dioxide and other harmful chemicals, when they are cut down , they release a huge amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, causing the temperatures to warm up .
My fifth reason:
Nuclear power plants which generate electricity through nuclear fission also produce greenhouse gas emissions, and creates nuclear waste , which , in turn to store them , we need to cut down an estimated 2120 trees by 2026 to supply enough space for the nuclear waste , which in turn create more carbon dioxide, warming up the climate.
My sixth point :
The domestication of livestock are rapidly increasing, and farmers , in turn burn down more trees to supply more space , creating the haze epidemics ( 2018 -2019) in Indonesia, India and even China. On top of that , farmers try to feed their livestock as much as possible, creating more emitting of greenhouse gases (farts and burps ) which in turn warm up the surroundings even more !
My seventh point :
Cars that run on gasoline create even more greenhouse emissions by chemical reactions in their engines , releasing carbon monoxide, methane , and most importantly, carbon dioxide.
My eighth point :
As more gasoline is used up , more fossil fuels are dip up and burnt , creating carbon dioxide, hydroxide , and much more chemicals, creating more greenhouse emissions by everything put together .
My addition to my fifth point : nuclear power plants can also produce greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide ( poisonous chemical, created by burning sulfur )and other stuff that also warm up the surroundings
Plus , how about the super cyclone that hit the eastern coast of New York City ? Your “evidence” of the matter seems outdated from 2019 . The cyclone was caused by - you guessed it- climate change , which is why the 1 billion oyster program was created to restore the city’s carbon footprint.
How about the melting of global ice caps ? The world loses about ten metric tons of ice per year! That is about the weight of 400 elephants of ice ! How is that not caused by human activity?
How about the Australian wildfires in 2019 ? This disaster was one of the largest wildfires in the world since the 2000s !
How about increasing change in rainfall patterns? Ever since humans first began to increase the greenhouse gas emissions, different floods are happening around the globe, and have you heard that Ireland is about to sink by 2190 ?
@@yaluo5648 Nuclear power plants, producing carbon dioxide? And sulfur dioxide? How come?
@@yaluo5648 My first point :
First point. Temperature on Earth is not increasing.
"Ice hockey stick" happened to be a scam. Check climategate story.
My second point :
Oxygen is produced via photosynthesis. Photosynthesis needs carbon.
If you want to have more trees and plants - YOU HAVE TO BURN THE COAL
No carbon dioxide - no plants.
My third point :
Ozone layer is not depleted and it is in fact OK. Are we talking about Ozone layer or climate change?
My fourth point :
Carbon dioxide is not a harmful chemical. It is produced in your body.
Actually trees are not a major contributor to photosynthesis.
It is sea plankton who is.
My fifth reason:
Nuclear power plant producing "gas emissions" - is just a pure lie.
My sixth point :
What is your proposal? Stop cows to fart?
In the past huge bison herds were roving plains. What is your plan to stop them farting?
My seventh point :
Cargon dioxide is produced by any animal, including human being.
My eighth point :
Burinig coal is a good thing. Now coal is trapped by coal. We return carbon where it belongs - trees.
*Are Israel and Palestine conflict & Russia and Ukraine conflict not responsible for increasing global warming ?* ( even little bit )
They are 100% responsible, but their is none in the world to ask the ware creator why they started wars?
This is exactly what I just thought ...
That's why 21st century here is no need to any warfare
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
Pity theirs no visuals!
Its me, darlu g.
More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment. He let an infrared beam pass through a tube filled with CO2 and measured the emerging light intensity. Upon reducing CO2 concentration in the tube, only a tiny difference could be found and he concluded that very few CO2 molecules are enough to completely absorb the IR beam. The conclusion was that a CO2 increase could not matter.
"More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment." That's laughable. Such a lab test cannot replicate how the real complex world of climate works, and more than a century later, THOUSANDS of much better research studies proves that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900 and that the climate crisis is lethal and urgent.
Take care.
Maximum 2 children policy for every country would have an immediate positive impact on global warming, migrationresources, employment etc. But corporation likebbc of course wouldn't discuss the source of problem...We are human, we all consume and therefore have an impact on everything from A to Z. I don't take anyone who lectures me on global warming seriously without first addressing the issue with global over population.
Limiting offspring is going to be an unpopular solution and tbf won't even work if we tackle the root cause and live sustainably in the first place
❤❤❤❤❤❤ beautiful video
Sir , Are the power plants collapsing cooling towers ? nijama?
ITS MORE HARD TO LIVE WITHOUT IMPATHY BY OTHERS...CRUEL WORLD TO CRUEL WEATHER ISNT IT! "
Just seen a BBC reporter in the south of the UK. Talking about global warming, with a hooded jacket and 3 other layers of thick fleeces. What a frarce. The major flooding in Dubia was caused by cloud seeding. In the Vietnam war America used cloud seeding. Cloud seeding technology has moved on a lot. I would not be surprised if this was not used now. All the new housing projects not one new reservoir.
What happened in dubai was not a cause of cloud seeding missions since immediately preceeding the flood there were no cloud seeding mission flown and also there have been many cloud seeding missions that have been flown and are being flown rioght now yet we havn't seen another flood on that scale anywhere
Are you dense or just another pointless bot from our planet destroying ffi?
@CH-et4go Can you only offer false choices or is reality more complicated?
@@OldScientist simple answers are for the delusional and the gullible. Truth requires accepting reality.
@CH-et4go Nice. You never resort to cold hard facts and data when a meaningless platitude would suffice.
Nije zagađenje puno to . Jednostavno ne dolazi dovoljno kisika u atmosferu.
The real reason for the changed climate is not Co 2.
There is a unique reason for this changing climate .
Thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of all global warming since 1900.
Wats solution for climate change now???
One thing I notice about climate videos is they're too wonky and academic for regular people to take this issue seriously. It's always framed as either gloom and doom or a fun educational adventure. Nothing showing how an earth on fire will affect people's practical lives.
Because it is quite gloom and doom if you want to be honest. Scienctific facts don’t give a shit about your feelings to be true. We’d accept it and act quickly or suffer the consequences
@@thanhnguyensolo and this approach has gotten you how far with the general public? Who you very much need?
Yes l think we should be more serious cause fossel fuel is the big joke
So why do the BBC keep sending thier presenters 1st class for a 4 min clip on some stupid, "and finally" news article and then tell OAPs, to turn down the heating an switch off the plug when they are cauing so many emissions and the poor OAP ends up in hospital with pneumonia?
@@thanhnguyensolo😂😂😂
Keep going, I love to watch stupidity at work in climate change people lol. You people make me laugh so hard hearing how you actually believe the crap your spewing even though it a load of 💩 and not true. Some on my side want you to shut up but not me, I love comic relief. To see just how dumb and gullible you are!!!!
😂😂😂😂😂
geo homework
Climate change refers to? long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns?
Human activities are not the main driver of what we have termed, climate change.
Recognising that the sun is the main contributor to our temperatures is important.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.
Sun storms are correlative with the current causes of our temperature fluctuations.
The 'deserts' and 'sea levels' however, 'they' indeed have been created, by mankind.
Jean-François Bastin, interesting question "What if there were 1 trillion more trees?"
Understandably, just how many trees do you think they are currently cutting down?
So you know, 'People cut down 15 billion trees each year, on one global tree count'.
United, the deforestation, estimated 46% since the beginning of human civilization.
So his question, is to more than double the just over 400 billion trees on the planet.
(:It would be 1.4 Trillion trees, keep in mind 800 billion estimated, before mankind;)
Actually, the research shows that the Earth has rapidly warmed while the sun's output has dimmed a notch and that ~98% of all global warming since 1900 was caused by our emissions.
Of course back in the 19th century rivers & lakes use to freeze over in the winter & there were even makets held on the Thames & Matt Taylor of the BBC said it was caused by low sun activity for years but in the last 20 years there has been high activity by the sun, does any body not think that may have something to do with climate change? Of course there have also been over 2000 nuclear bomb test since the WW2 with over 500 emitted into the atmosphere. All of these things have made differences to the worlds climate & I sincerely believe that all that radiation has caused one in two people now getting cancer.
So why if OAP's are told to turn down the heating, to walk intead taking the car, Yet they send people they employ for a 5 min clip 1st class, with film crew, go to every sporting stage, and take all thier staff, Balding Linekar, Myrie, Rita, Chakroborty, Anita Rani,Hariry bikers, Rick Stien, Vicky Young, Sarah Smith, Nadia Huessian, Anju Adnam.
hi
Ziki tuttuk insanlar olarak
when earth broke up?
On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C.
Today is 4th July 2024.
Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C
CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons
Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks.
@johnweir1217 == half wit
@@grindupBaker Always insults from the climate alarmists - try polite debate - might find it refreshing !
"On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C. Today is 4th July 2024. Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons. Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks." I believe that you are sincere, but you are confusing local and short-term WEATHER on the one hand with AVERAGE GLOBAL CLIMATE on the other hand. The heat on Earth is always unevenly distributed, so man-made global warming doesn't mean that every July 4 will be hotter than every other July day in previous years--that's not how it works. We will even still set record daily cold temps in various places, but the GLOBAL AVERAGE is getting warmer, including the long-term average for the UK.
So don'y be confused by random short-term weather fluctuations: The climate crisis is real, lethal, urgent, and we caused it... and it's getting worse every decade.
Climate change refers to the long-term changes in weather patterns that are observed across different regions of the Earth. These changes are primarily driven by human activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences. activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences.
Except any scientist that disagrees is cancelled
Weather patterns remain the same. Weather is not effected by human activity. Sea level is not rising and glaciers are not melting. Storms and hurricanes are pretty much at the same level as hundred years ago. And ... one more thing. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
@@markluxon5044 Yes you right! And even more. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
Why now a days weather very smoggy in my country Pakistan?
Ur politicians are all corrupted so.
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc.
Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs.
Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
What are suggesting? Abortion? Murder? I think a safer and more agreeable choice for the world would be to reduce the utility of our nonrenewable sources but not so drastically that we can't use our daily services that are run on nonrenewable energy.
@@deliciouspaint
I was suggesting population reduction..fewer additional people.
@@renzo6490 But even with that in mind, it's not the most easiest way out of our global issue. Imagine how upset people would get if the government restricts everyone to have fewer children then what they'd hope? Sure that could help the environment but would it truly be agreeable to the people? Activists tend to have unrealistic ideas and this is probably one of them.
@@deliciouspaint
over population of the planet is the root cause of all our current problems.
Kyoto rio kig
Ali koppenha
Gon maccaresh paris all should be implemented
stop driving personal cars! Use buses or trains.
Of course, there is not enough public transportation! Don't talk but take action before too late!
Click here to subscribe to our channel 👉🏽 bbc.in/3VyyriM
Do not use gasoline engine lawn mowers!
After the energy crises of the 1970s we statarted the intensive use of energy and in global characterised the era of industrialisation. Future moves in direction we reguire! For instance many European countries during the last few decades uses the hot water traditionally to supply energy. Low enthalpy sources for heating offer various spectrum of applications. It is time for all of us to prevent it with renewable energy sources!
Maldive añd laccadive are endangered
This weather is hotter in the south of the planet so we must leave or change the climate.
Today is Feb 17, 2024.
1. Why is the Earth getting warmer considered as a global issue?
Some people will be thinking I like hot weather. What's wrong with it?
Some parts of the word are already pretty hot. If you are in a particularly hot city and that suddenly gets a chunk hotter, that's going to make it a lot harder to live in that city. Beyond that, around the world, we have seen first-hand the effects of the world getting warmer. Climate change is turbocharging all sorts of extreme weather events like heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires.
2. How do the climate change cause floods and?
That seems to be the opposite of what some people have thought would happen. Warm water takes up more spaces than cold water. And so, you get this thing called thermal expansion. Sea level rising is due to the amount of the warm water in the sea. Besides that, hot atmosphere causes ice sheets to melt, not just melt from the top down, but also to flow faster into the ocean. We 've already seen a huge increase in the rate of ice loss. Some parts of the word are also experiencing more drought as more water gets carried away from those areas,
The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It warmed faster in the past. There is no climate crisis.
I strongly agree with you!!
Numbers are showing a different picture
@imtheeastgermanguy5431 No they don't. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change:
Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution.
increased lightning: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution.
There is no climate crisis.
The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change:
Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments
Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution.
Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend
(14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence).
Ecological Drought as above.
Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend.
43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence).
So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising!
There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis.
The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed:
Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions),
Aridity,
Avalanche (snow),
Average precipitation,
Average Wind Speed,
Coastal Flood,
Agricultural drought,
Hydrological drought,
Erosion of Coastlines,
Fire Weather (hot and windy),
Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods),
Frost,
Hail,
Heavy Rain,
Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms,
Landslides,
Marine Heatwaves,
Ocean Acidity,
Radiation at the Earth’s Surface,
River/Lake Floods,
Sand and Dust Storms,
Sea Level,
Severe Wind Storms,
Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets,
Tropical Cyclones.
How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6?
"There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions."
"There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions."
"Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)."
There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
I do think that what you guys saying is just preposterously ridiculous because in my city the impacts of climate change are quite visible it caused to rise in cancer and other respiratory disease
@rawazardalan2288 I am uncertain of your location and how a small increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere results in an increase in cancer rates in just your area. There are, however, lots of positive effects associated with climate change. There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%!
Climate change saved 555,103 lives in England and Wales between 2001 and 2020 (ONS, 2022).
There are over 5 million excess deaths per annum globally due to abnormal temperatures from the 2000-2019 study led Prof. Guo of Monash University. It found that over 90% of excess deaths were caused by excess COLD rather than excess heat. This applied globally including in the hottest continent, Africa. So, in a world with increasingly mild temperatures, there will be less excess death. Warming is good not bad.
One of the main causes of death in the poorer parts of the world is attributable to air pollution. This is because they have to burn wood and dung over open fires for cooking and heating in their homes. These people need access to gas stoves and electricity to improve their health and life expectancy. They need fossil fuels to make them healthy and wealthy.
Don’t you mean global warming? Since we know the temperature of the earth is not increasing we had to change the name to climate change.
The temperature of the earth is increasing we started using climate change because its a more accurate description of the phenomenon previously known as global warming. The earth is warming and this warming will have a multitude of effects which in some circumstances can cause all sorts of things like more precipitation but also more drought, more heat but also more cold and can increase the frequency and magnitude of natural disasters. Now you see why we call it climate change
Watch Frankenskies, Geoengineering watch.
Extreme Weather is what we are facing. If it is climate change then we can predict its pattern.
None of the beggar countries test nuclear weapons.
That is bollox. Our addition of gases does not make much difference.
cabon dioxide is the gas of life....duh
If it is how would you like it if we shoved you in a room with just carbon dioxide?
*cough* geo homework
i don't do crappy podcasts with no video
Now halp my sorry good bay
I am bad but Earth good😂
Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels.
TH-cam Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy.
Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT.
Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses.
It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are.
Is this program for kids? It is not appealing to hear voices but not see faces and instead we just see some graphics. A poor communication strategy!
❤❤❤❤
there will be signs in the sun moon and stars, on earth nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea, ( luke 21v 25 )
Afforestation is best way to absorb ghgs
No it isn't and won't solve this anyway. Wake UP. You work for an oil lobby? They like saying shit like "forests" too. And, they LIE.
While other countries getting more cold
Need regulation of human consumptions
🇿🇦
🎉
พื้นดินที่ไหนเย็นในเมืองร้อนนั่นเหมือนหมายถึงมีแม่น้ำไหลผ่านหรือมีอ่างเก็บน้ำก็ช่วยทำให้พื้นผิวโลกมุมนั้นเย็นลงได้นะค่ะ
โอ่ สายเขียวเหมียนกันคับ
Earth will finish one day cuz everyone looking for extra money in this short,
yeah
What is climate change ? A cashcow for the university of , fillin the blanks , follow the money , all the facts are PREDICTIONS !!!
🚩
More climate propaganda.
Propaganda
Liars
One word ‘hoax’
WTF is this format
Lol.
More BS from the BBC
This is pure unadulterated PROPAGANDA!!
Why nobody Talking about China ?? They produce the most CO2. Is it because business with them is profitable ?? Silly!
CO2 is a good thing. It is a "food" for plants and trees. Without CO2 plants and trees (in fact everything with photosynthesis) will die.
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc.
Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs.
Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
Depopulation agenda
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
Yawn.
@@hosnimubarak8869
That's probably the Smartest thing you have ever said, Intelligent !
@@geob8172
Sadly, you probably think your original comment is quite witty.
Well I am intelligent enough to know that Climate Change is a SCAM. That's why they stop using "Global Warming" What can effects our weather ? Look up HAARP. !
@@geob8172
Do you deny current atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are over 30% higher than they were about 150 years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution and in the same time span the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming?