Is Scott Aaronson the only person that we need to talk to with quantum computing? If that;'s the case, then no wonder why Wall Street is betting against the technology working.
The difference here, between the question asker and the question answerer, that difference is obvious here, that difference is a little thing called objectivity. Fan boys (and fan girls), can't do it, are stuck in subjectivity land. Sad. A perfect illustration of why science is so much more effective and efficient a path towards inquiry that leads to maps of any fidelity to nature.
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
Is Scott Aaronson the only person that we need to talk to with quantum computing? If that;'s the case, then no wonder why Wall Street is betting against the technology working.
The difference here, between the question asker and the question answerer, that difference is obvious here, that difference is a little thing called objectivity. Fan boys (and fan girls), can't do it, are stuck in subjectivity land. Sad. A perfect illustration of why science is so much more effective and efficient a path towards inquiry that leads to maps of any fidelity to nature.
Sorry Scott but my attention went completely astray with the beauty of this girl
When I edit a video I always cut out all the hums and "errrs". And my channel has way less subs than this one. So, you can do it too
.... This is a conference talk archive channel. "Editing" consists of adding the title card.
Which humms and errs?