วีดีโอ

When Scott speaks, I listen.

Quantum computing

Moku-Pro

Great presentation of this ongoing work.

Awesome presentation Dr. Nicole 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

How did I end up here? This is pretty heavy.

I just bought a 1000 shares at $1.27. I'm going to hold and see what happens!

We want to share with Companies, Universities and Governments 57 years of successful professional experience in several countries, in Oil and Gas, Petrochemical, Steel, Hydroelectric, Engineering and Construction Projects. Since 1981 we have been developing the Digital Twin, which is the most complete technological tool to optimize all types of Companies, Cities and Countries. th-cam.com/video/eadaQiL_AK0/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/fXlp4QLdWQs/w-d-xo.html

Export the Azure, Chat GPT, Revit, Plant 3D, Civil 3D, Inventor, ENGI file of the Building or Refinery to Excel, prepare Budget 1 and export it to COBRA. Prepare Budget 2 and export it to Microsoft Project. Solve the problems of Overallocated Resources, Planning Problems, prepare the Budget 3 with which the construction of the Building or the Refinery is going to be quoted.

Great work Iris !!!!

Thanks

“Steps” of an algorithm are hardly a basis for comparison. What is the run time complexity?

I would have asked him about P=NP again. Personally I think P≈NP, that is complexity classes are ill-defined and the problem is ill-posed at the moment. He discussed it back in 2006 where he gave a bunch of informal reasons why he believes P≠NP. A lot of which showed me that he really doesn't fully understand the problem. If P≠NP, it would be at least POSSIBLE, if not easy to PROVE that. But one of the things he said was "if P=NP, then everyone would be Mozart, because it would require the same amount of effort to trivially create works of art as it does to appreciate them". That statement hasn't aged well in light of recent advances of generative AI. It HAS become trivially easy to create works of art.

Excellent talk!

Bruh you know i build motherboards and after this comment a Fatherboard which you cann8do due to incompetent and lack of self esteem tryptophan to not succeed in my talents you envy😂😂😂

Great work Yianni.

hopefully it will bring some money to quantum computing haha

Best boss I've ever had!! Happy to see pushing Quatum ML to it's evolution

Excellent talk . No hype . Just facts and solid arguments …

Amazing talk

Talk to Ian Bremmer. He could need some help next time.

This could benefit greatly from creating a better set of subtitles.

@ 19:40 he said "we have nothing less than 65 degrees". Was he referring to the machine or the environment around it? My understanding is you need to have the machine (gates) kept at near absolute zero. Perhaps he meant 65 K? IBM says they need less than 1 K.

Great.

Great.

I've never heard of this conference before and the video is only an hour old. The TH-cam algorithm works in mysterious ways sometimes. Great presentation by the way.

BUONGIORNO DOT. VENTURELLI,NE HA FATTA DI STRADA DALLE GUIDOTTI ALLA NASA.AUGURI DI CUORE DAL TUO VECCHIO PROF DEL CORSO D.

Where can I get a pdf of these slides

Summary: The conversation covers various aspects of quantum computing, including circuit depth, quantum advantage, error correction, and the commercialization of quantum computing. Anastasia Marchenkova discusses recent developments in the field, the need for error correction in scaling quantum advantage, and the future directions of quantum computing. Scott Aaronson discusses the importance of circuit depth and ruling out the possibility of random circuit sampling providing a quantum advantage without error correction. He also expresses the need for comparisons between quantum and classical computing, as well as the improvement of quantum supremacy experiments. The conversation concludes with discussions on the speaker's involvement in quantum computing, the commercialization of quantum computing, and the physical reality of quantum entanglement. Key themes: 1. Recent developments in quantum computing, including circuit depth, error correction, and quantum advantage. 2. The need for comparisons between quantum and classical computing, as well as the improvement of quantum supremacy experiments. 3. The commercialization of quantum computing and the physical reality of quantum entanglement. Suggested follow-up questions: 1. How can the field of quantum computing further improve gate fidelities and establish more robust quantum supremacy experiments? 2. What are the main challenges in developing error correction techniques for scaling quantum advantage? 3. How can interdisciplinary collaboration between computer scientists, physicists, and mathematicians be fostered to tackle the challenges in quantum computing? 4. What are the potential practical applications of quantum computing that can be explored beyond quantum approximate optimization algorithms? 5. How can the adoption of post quantum cryptography solutions be facilitated to address national security concerns related to scalable quantum computers breaking public key cryptography?

When the AQ64 arrives in 2025 IonQ will be two years away from Quantum Supremacy. Jungsang Kim and Chris Monroe are not only going to be very famous but also very wealthy men indeed whether IonQ catapults into the next dimension of supercomputing or is bought out by a Google or Microsoft who will take it there. And I for one plan on joining them with 5000 shares of IonQ going long. Buying more as I’m able.

“I can’t give you exact answer “ means it’s bullshit .it’s don’t scale.

In Brazil quantum computer my live course in MIT

Photons travel 😅

The man, the man the legend that failed in a simple game xD

This the only one (present time) that can be classified as a scientist, he isn’t Hallucinator (realistic).

Giza and the temples across our environment used same technologies just saying 😉

finally Scott debunked superdeterminism

Thank you so much for providing this!

The only moment worthy to watch is at 25:50

This guy is awesome

This stuff has no potential, it's too strict to model natural language and more expensive than any attention-based architecture. I wouldn't bet a nickle on it.

Whose jth qubit is he talking about in the local cost function? Also is the equation for O(L) dimensionally correct?

Amazing insights! Thank you

Thank you 😊

Transformers IBM lighting system becomes a

Impressive presentation by Daniela Becker

You got to admit, that was a good idea.:)

Nice work !

Good show, Peter! It is indeed a Quantum 2.0 journey.

Ive gotta be the only person coming back to look back on 2 years progress lol... ionq now has a 60k sqfoot manufacturing plant, a quantum networker in canada, and a 23 aq chip 3 months ahead of schedual... peter probably wouldent have even pictured this progress just 2 years ago lol