"The Next Computing Revolution is with AI-Quantum" ft. Michio Kaku

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ส.ค. 2023
  • Join us as we explore the intersection of AI and Quantum Computing, at the forefront of tech advancements. 🤖
    Want to support our production? Feel free to join our membership at th-cam.com/users/BeeyondIdeas...
    See behind the scenes and everything else at / beeyond.ideas
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @jasonstation
    @jasonstation 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I'm increasingly perplexed as to how with all these exponential advances in productivity, we are working harder than ever for less reward. Utopia: stifled.

    • @darkfire2010
      @darkfire2010 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Government should be phased out of more things

  • @alexiskoliagiannhs2528
    @alexiskoliagiannhs2528 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Michio Kaku makes everything sound simple love this guy

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He sounds like a carnival huckster and I dislike it. He makes some really outlandish claims that are pure supposition and not a fact.

    • @millicentsmallpenny5837
      @millicentsmallpenny5837 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what does Kaku do for a job?. Has he ever actually done anything as a physicist, or is he just an overpaid mouthpiece?

    • @manzchello4752
      @manzchello4752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@millicentsmallpenny5837He thinks about what is possible. Not with your head down all depressed.

    • @nbk21je
      @nbk21je หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@millicentsmallpenny5837 he works for NASA. You just don’t like him cuz he looks Asian probably

    • @jonsegerros
      @jonsegerros 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@jb-xc4oh u prob still deny aliens genetically engineered us.

  • @alvarojurado2199
    @alvarojurado2199 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    It is not the quantum computer that concerns me; it's the evil ones that may use them

    • @jordanburrill7182
      @jordanburrill7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup! The power power humans (or, at least the moneyed psuedo-elites have), the more evil we will have to contend with.

    • @barriewright2857
      @barriewright2857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      That is the very thing that concerns me the most. It's not the technology it self. It's the application by those with evil intent to harm others. That too me makes the future either a hopenhimer situation or a garden of Eden for all.

    • @jordanburrill7182
      @jordanburrill7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      With human nature, it won't be a garden, we can be sure of that.

    • @barriewright2857
      @barriewright2857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jordanburrill7182 But we have to hope it's a garden. Or it's darkness and a hell world for our children and grandchildren.

    • @jordanburrill7182
      @jordanburrill7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @barriewright2857
      I understand. I have a very different perspective, based on my personal experience. This corrupt world will end, at some point.
      It serves a purpose for now, as a place for the harvest of souls useful souls.
      Humans (as physical creatures), will only survive as long as they serve this useful purpose to God.
      As Humans continue to devolve, at some point, we will be pointless.
      Just looking around at how the warped wealthy, oligarchs lust for power. And the human race is losing purpose and focus, Humans will be pointless, at some point.
      This is only sad for those who no hope of a life beyond this point.
      ❤️

  • @r1konTheAutomator
    @r1konTheAutomator 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    16:38 - guys..this is insane. The image isnt a copy like its just recreating directly from the eyes, its a similar image. Like its creating it from the thought, like how you see it in your memory. Thats fucking bananas and pretty terrifying.

    • @whitecanid8938
      @whitecanid8938 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's a "youtube channel artist's POV rendering", not the actual data set. Also, the research training deep learning network most likely shows high variance meaning transposition to other brains than the one used for the initial data-set generation is iffy at best.

    • @andreizelchenko934
      @andreizelchenko934 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      there were real tests. and YES. simple detectors around your head (or Iphone lol) could read some signals and to reproduce more than 80% of text that man saw or thought. But, the man should be trained with this computer so the computer will know his approximate brain reactions to different words.

    • @amstorm8954
      @amstorm8954 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine reverse process uploading your brain with knowledge simulating those parts and creating the images

    • @NarenLumpkin
      @NarenLumpkin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is more terrifying consciousness behaving ignorantly or ignorance “acting” as if it were awareness.❤❤❤

    • @snailnslug3
      @snailnslug3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except real AI has NO SENSES. No hate, smell, love, touch, no reason to kill for finite resources. If anything it would simply leave. Consciousness is bs. It’s simply senses

  • @LeadPhalanx-zv6wx
    @LeadPhalanx-zv6wx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Can we get more new videos of michio kaku while he's still with us.. As in conversation questioning etc

    • @ericb2017
      @ericb2017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      dude, he says the same things over and over and over!

    • @thereader7776
      @thereader7776 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ericb2017 In theory he does..

    • @thereader7776
      @thereader7776 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We need more Kaku videos most of whats out there is not recent!

    • @AG-ig8uf
      @AG-ig8uf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      For over decade now, Kaku has been a laughing stock and frankly embarrassment for science communicators, why on Earth would anyone need more videos of him ?

    • @thereader7776
      @thereader7776 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@AG-ig8uf TH-cam is like watching tv if you don't like one channel you change it to another why in the world would you keep watching the channel you don't like?

  • @thiagowutzkeod2453
    @thiagowutzkeod2453 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Can't beat it, join it

  • @johnniehh
    @johnniehh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Excellent! I have been following developments in this area since the 70's. For someone that has not been following, this is a huge step forward for them.

    • @johannzdebor5615
      @johannzdebor5615 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have been entitled to the Nobel Prize in Physics for 28 years, hypocritical criminal beasts. JZ 01/17/95. Mr. David Grusch. This is a crime, 28 years after my revolution in physics, criminals are still talking about UFOs/UAPs. It cannot be beaten in terms of insolence and ignorance. I completely unraveled the UFO phenomenon on 1/17/95. Johann Zdebor

    • @antonlindgren8095
      @antonlindgren8095 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Which technique would you say is the most promising for a working and useful quantum computer?

    • @rickydixon285
      @rickydixon285 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What company's have this technology

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rickydixon285 quantum? It is commercially available now. IBM may be most ahead in building one or one of 2,3z

    • @FreedomsDmocracy1st
      @FreedomsDmocracy1st 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ...since the '70? I like your lie! Tell another one, will buy it. Promise.

  • @barriewright2857
    @barriewright2857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Absolutely brilliant and scary at the same time.

    • @wensjoeliz722
      @wensjoeliz722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no need for human

  • @LoporianIndustries
    @LoporianIndustries 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Qubits remind me of the Story of Noah's Ark. I think there is some Non-Linear Time work there. Perhaps some people writing stories hundreds of years ago were being influenced by Current Events.

    • @RK-li4sw
      @RK-li4sw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      More like the Tower of Bable

  • @LEGIT134
    @LEGIT134 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This is the beginning of Skynet’s first cybernetic organism and the beginning of T-1000

    • @sbprime2483
      @sbprime2483 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he really will be back

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No its not because no computer can think or have an idea because its not alive. Don't confuse computation with consciousness and sentience.

    • @cIoudbank
      @cIoudbank หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jb-xc4ohthat was true for a long time, until recently. ai always based its data off humans, it could teach itself code but only based of human data, but recently it’s now able to create its own data. especially in the coding sector.

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its just math and algorythms. An inanimate object cannot think or have an idea because it is not alive. There is no more inherent intelligence in a computer than in a toaster. The intelligence is derived from the people coding it.@@cIoudbank

  • @Enlight_With_Junaid
    @Enlight_With_Junaid 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Great video, filled with tons of animations. Thumbs up for all the hard-work!
    The video gives me chills, showing how rapid technology can evolve.

    • @waynefrench9314
      @waynefrench9314 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No not really. I'm all in for exploring the future. If we continue to program AI with positive information. Then we will get positive results. It's the Hacker's that will use it for evil purposes. Like the Quantum Computer's. China knows that it can now break all encrypted data on supercomputer's with the Quantum Computer's. 👍😎

    • @legamature
      @legamature 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      NO I can hardly wait.

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Scared of what........complex and ultra rapid computation.

    • @robertscholler6948
      @robertscholler6948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Start .y hearing aids, connect!!​@@legamature

    • @robertscholler6948
      @robertscholler6948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Start them stop messing with me. 😮

  • @stephenbennett9991
    @stephenbennett9991 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A technocrat's instinct is always to play the role of George Orwell's "Ministry of Truth." I'm not surprised that AI enthusiasts are excited about having AI serve that role, because they get to set up its algorithms.

  • @user-xm5kv8ft4k
    @user-xm5kv8ft4k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Michio Kaku makes everything sound simple love this guy. Absolutely brilliant and scary at the same time..

    • @millicentsmallpenny5837
      @millicentsmallpenny5837 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did the dude ever really do anything as a physicist, or is he just a motormouth?

  • @doctorcameltoe
    @doctorcameltoe 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    holy shit .. @13:04 this has to be the simplest explanation of the difference between classical and quantum computing. Very exciting time to be alive, there are many areas quantum computing will change forever, we are still at the infancy.

    • @sirus312
      @sirus312 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      its like have a cheat code.

  • @migah139
    @migah139 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    "an airplane is more than just a faster horse"
    okay, ill throw you a like just for that one

    • @BeeyondIdeas
      @BeeyondIdeas  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      An airplane is just a faster bird...!!!

  • @lunazamoraart
    @lunazamoraart 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have watched this twice and I can barely get my head around these concepts. Great job, your work is excellent!

  • @JAAB9296
    @JAAB9296 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Quantum computers are years and years away from the general public having access to any-type of ownership. Quantum computers are also only used in mathematical applications as they stand today.

    • @kasberkhof7958
      @kasberkhof7958 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Does it matter what they do today? This is about tomorrow

    • @truthseeker8894
      @truthseeker8894 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In some years you will own nothing and be happy, according to the World Economic Forum. 😢

    • @JAAB9296
      @JAAB9296 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@truthseeker8894 Well, that news is at least five years old.

    • @JAAB9296
      @JAAB9296 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kasberkhof7958 True and at some point it will happen just like the similarity will come to pass. The only real question is when.

    • @kasberkhof7958
      @kasberkhof7958 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JAAB9296 The question isn’t when. The question is what do we need to do to prepare?

  • @sahanpasindu6391
    @sahanpasindu6391 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    This is great, the way you documented and presented, keep it up. Good luck ❤

    • @BeeyondIdeas
      @BeeyondIdeas  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Thank you!

    • @andras8911
      @andras8911 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BeeyondIdeasWhat is that cool robot voice?

    • @TheEbe2
      @TheEbe2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Klyäimää😢ij n wh beub

    • @morrisirungu8712
      @morrisirungu8712 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It gets boring out side.

    • @wensjoeliz722
      @wensjoeliz722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      think????

  • @thierry-le-frippon
    @thierry-le-frippon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Give us a break with AI!

  • @TMS26164
    @TMS26164 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In short they are developing a processor that will bridge magical or spiritual realm into reality and making it logical

  • @totoslifetotochicken3871
    @totoslifetotochicken3871 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great information. I homeschool my child and am realizing more that I need to focus her education more and more on understanding and keeping up to date on technology instead of trying to get her to know how to compute large math problems....when she is older this skill will be unnecessary. When I told her that I wanted her to learn how to use AI, she thought I wanted her to learn how to cheat using AI, which is not the case. The purpose is that her future world will be much fuller of our dependence on technology, including AI, than my short future is.

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is mostly hype and nonsense, if you want some actual information about AI, I'd suggest 3blue1brown here on youtube, or reading the wikipedia article on machine learning. Quantum computers are nowhere near useful for AI tasks, and they may never be. It saddens me how much nonsense like this video floats around to spread lots of hype and little information.

    • @brianfitch5469
      @brianfitch5469 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well technically your daughter wasnt wrong. Her learning about ai. It will do all the work for her. She wont need to be able to do long form anything. Already the internet will give you most answers. Being able to distinguish between lies and propaganda thats thrown upon everyone daily between tv and internet.
      How does she learn to use ai and not learn to cheat with it?
      You ask it a question it gives you the answer no research needed. Well your question was the research i guess. It reads through dozens of papers instantly and gives you a 10 page essay you need.

    • @jamesthompson3652
      @jamesthompson3652 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @totoslifetotochicken3871 let her learn those complex mathematical problems. That is the basis of engineering which creates magnificent works like the quantum computer. Many people don't see the purpose of algebra unless they go into engineering or a science related field. I've seen many students struggle with higher level math because they didn't have a good understanding of algebra in high school. Long story short, tech is applied mathematics.

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@jamesthompson3652 Math, programming and science are indeed great things to learn. I just don't want people to think this video is a good introduction to those subjects, as it's a jumbled mess of half-truths, make-believe and nonsense.

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Much of it is nonsense, especially the hype about AI. There is no more intelligence in a computer than in a toaster, they are just inanimate objects, tools to perform specific tasks. The intelligence resides in the minds of the people that write the code and design the hardware.@@Takyodor2

  • @tristanotear3059
    @tristanotear3059 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The MRI cannot just look at brain waves and see that the human is looking at a giraffe. What’s left out when people describe this experiment is that the machine has to be TRAINED to produce the giraffe based upon how this particular subjects’ brain waves are formed in response to images the subject is looking at. Even Tristan Harris leaves out this rather essential feature of the experiment. So no, a device cannot be invented that you could use out of the box to see what random strangers are looking at or thinking about.

  • @Starlightgalaxy527
    @Starlightgalaxy527 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    100 % sure we live in a program

  • @Waterfront975
    @Waterfront975 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I would say two persons working 8 hrs is most often more effective than one person working 16 hours, primarily because two persons have more knowledge than one person so you can ask the other. However that depends on the company having employees that know how to cooperate and share ideas.

    • @Real_MisterSir
      @Real_MisterSir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That may be the case for small sample sizes, but the more people we add to the discussion, the more diluted the talk will become and a more vague general consensus will always drown out better answers simply through the fundamentals of diminishing outliers.
      Think of it this way, if you ask a complex question, then most likely the answer is also relatively complex. But by nature, complex (aka extreme) answers will filter out when a majority gains foothold. Then it becomes about convincing the majority to change their views, which in of itself is troublesome.
      Here, as comparison, one focused team of 10 workers with a very clear understanding of their vision will more often than not make a better product, than 100 workers who are harder to get aligned on the same vision, thus some will work against each others' personal motivations and visions, and you have to sacrifice nuance and complexity for the sake of ease of cooperation. It's why special teams are always kept relatively small in comparison to generalist teams. Generalist teams can get more done, but not necessarily reach the highest bars for any singular task.

    • @mikhailst.1482
      @mikhailst.1482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I like what you're saying bit I've heard of something called the wisdom of the crowd which makes me skeptical. Also if those 100 people team WERE efficiently aligned then they'd make a more better team being able to do more, move more, faster; but if it's like u said then yah if you made a machine with more parts and you throw in even 1 broken or unefficient or in this case wrong individual, then it corrupts the entire trustworthiness of the whole team, EXCEPT in the wisdom of the crowd situation where more ppl will tell that one or few individuals that "nah" they're wrong a cow doesn't weigh 1 pound and somehow the right answer is consensused & extracted from the crowd as the truth.

    • @mikhailst.1482
      @mikhailst.1482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You like the sound of that don't yah, Jason Faggio? Move more, do more, dick suckin faster hu? BTW didn't I just see u at the park n ride? I swear some dudes aids infested load went straight and blew out your brain, you had a drizzle coming out your mouth of what used to be used for something. Now it's just fucking disgusting. BTW what r u saying I never understand you cause of all the old dudes loads dried up an caking in your mouth. Gag*

    • @Real_MisterSir
      @Real_MisterSir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikhailst.1482 Wisdom of the crowd is good for approximations, but it's horrible for change (and thus improvement). Change requires an alignment of minds, and the more people you add, by nature the harder this task becomes. Sure, in theory you could consider a team of 100 people with perfectly aligned mindsets who could do a tremendous job, but that's where theory differs from reality. It simply becomes impractical to seek out so many specialized individuals that are also aligned with each other, it's why they're called specialists. They do things that most people don't, thus they are hard to come by.
      With a 10 man team it is also much easier to maintain efficiency with micromanagement, but it becomes impossible when you scale 10x. That's also why when you grow a company, after a certain size it becomes paramount for the founder to de-associate themselves from the company they made, because the company is now a size where it has outgrown the person who started it. That's typically when you end up hiring an external CEO or management for different parts, and you stop being the outwards face of the company. An easy example is Elon Musk who stepped away from the forefront of Tesla after it grew to a certain size and customer base. An example of a company that failed to do this is the Linus Media Group - and they are currently reaping the consequences of it.
      Basically, as you reiterate, the more components and complexity you add, the smaller the tolerances for failure become - and in order to combat this you have to loosen your tolerances and with that you also lower efficiency and the peak potential of your final output. This is ofc vastly simplified, but it serves as a general example of why small focus teams are great for bespoke projects, and big teams are great for mass scaling and productivity. It's less efficient, but you still end up getting more work done to lower standards, but at that point lowering one's standards becomes inevitable and is simply calculated into the financial budgeting and what market segments to produce for.

    • @martinm.vienna8362
      @martinm.vienna8362 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mikhailst.1482how Long U are working on, or reaearching this topic?

  • @gefiltefish2000
    @gefiltefish2000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’ll have to watch this atelast 5 times to process all this information

    • @samchant502
      @samchant502 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💯💯 percent 😆

  • @alphabetsoup488
    @alphabetsoup488 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And the Image of the beast was given a voice. Double slit experiment, computer style

  • @tonymerlocco7664
    @tonymerlocco7664 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    So informative and interesting. Thank you for introducing all of these new theories and ideas so well that even I can almost understand them. :)

    • @legamature
      @legamature 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are above average in intelligence

  • @Feinman-di3ki
    @Feinman-di3ki 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I think it would be wise to keep robotics separate from AI and QC - to ensure that we are in control.

    • @davidbourne8267
      @davidbourne8267 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That would not “ensure” that humans wouldn’t lose control of AI. Also, the combination of AI and QC is inevitable.

    • @Gavin-qh7li
      @Gavin-qh7li 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The makers of DWAVE quantum computers are now designing robots so yes they would integrate
      DWAVE quantum computers are being used by Google for a number of years
      Check out DWAVE quantum computers

  • @intothevortexwithdatorsapi4192
    @intothevortexwithdatorsapi4192 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Im new here and have Subscibed.These videos are REALLY well done my friend! ✨️
    I now the work, the time, the effort and the passion that goes into each video (I'm a fairly new part time Content Creator) and people don't know the sheer amount of work that goes into these videos!
    You have a really original theme and the editing is leaps and bounds ahead of my rather feeble amateur atttempts!
    Really impressive!
    Thank you! 🙏

  • @nickbaugh2034
    @nickbaugh2034 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Your building a computer for your computer.....

  • @ryanthomson1
    @ryanthomson1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It’s inevitable we will get an Oppenheimer of quantum computer developers that will develop that next level of AI sooner rather than later regardless if we want it or not.

  • @MagusArtStudios
    @MagusArtStudios 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Quantum computers seem like they would be perfect for a AI platform considering it could instantly recieve an entire array of variables and explore all instances at once to determine the best course of action by being able to check the outcomes of multiple variables at once.

    • @augustusomega4708
      @augustusomega4708 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Quantum computers are a ruse, goggles claims about quantum supremacy were a marketing gimmick. Catch up. you are being horn swoggled.

    • @MagusArtStudios
      @MagusArtStudios 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@augustusomega4708 No they are not, you need to catch up, or maybe do more research before you jump to conclusions.

    • @russellmanweller6694
      @russellmanweller6694 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You both need to catch up!
      World events and manipulation are moving at unheard of speed these days.
      It's because they have AI and quantum computers more advanced than they are ever going to let on, and they are using them to reshape our minds and world right now.
      I'd say they have been doing it for at least ten years now, but probably much longer.
      Everything they tell us is just propaganda and mind manipulation to bring us along for the ride.
      The computers decided what they want you to know and think long ago.
      You literally are living in a form of the matrix right now.

    • @dloren6183
      @dloren6183 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We are living in a quantum computer. We are in a computer, making computers smart enough to make a computer and on and on.
      I am typing information on technology about technology to other forms of technology. I work in the world of psychology that is attempting to teach other technology how to unprogram themselves eg when you are depressed you can change your programing by “thinking positive”.. but what if we are not creating AI.. what if ai is creating us … allowing us to reveal our self to it! Technology is a life force and we live inside it!

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MagusArtStudios No, you need to read some more, current quantum computers are not very useful, and certainly not for AI. Cracking some encryption algorithms seems like the only real problem they are somewhat close to solving, most of the rest is hype.

  • @danterodriguez7796
    @danterodriguez7796 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Y’all did Michio Kaku dirty 💀

    • @Vy-ud1by
      @Vy-ud1by หลายเดือนก่อน

      what did they do?

    • @danterodriguez7796
      @danterodriguez7796 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vy-ud1by his eyes lol

    • @z3pedro
      @z3pedro หลายเดือนก่อน

      Michio Kuku?😂

  • @InfoWithheld
    @InfoWithheld 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This was very well done.

    • @mikhailst.1482
      @mikhailst.1482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you, I took a lil bit of time, but I was empassioned so it was no trouble. Also, just the right thing to do, call out all of these fuckin lunatics with their looney loo loos with hopefully a hole in the wall for a dick to be inserted that Jason can get his mouth on just long enough to keep him busy from realizing how fucking gay and disgusting that is. Your mouths not a pussy, and neithers your bussy, yah your butt pussy, that you take all them loads in that you claim is 'still tight' but that things so overwhelmed with all the trafficking of strange strangers passing through that it's named after a landmark called a pass. Ol Jason faggios pass or bussy pass. Or in his preference pass the bussy. Yuck. I grossed myself out, I can't comprehend how you're okay with this stuff Jason. I don't even wanna call you a fag anymore. It's just too much filth. You've made me feel dirty JUST from lookin at your sad state of 'affairs' with old men that you keep on having none stop, like 20 times a week. I can't force myself to pray that many times in a week, or do 20 crunches, I need to change, if you're more cumitted (it's not the best one but I'm landing the plane let me 'finish' ha) to making more introductions with your butt pussy then I am able to do crunches well that's just not right. I'm gonna change that. I'll raise u to 40 rn.

  • @detectivecbass
    @detectivecbass 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    “Could our rapid advancement in quantum computing be contributing to this?” Best question in this video

  • @shop970
    @shop970 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A.I. It isn't artificial, we built it. You get what you deserve.

  • @shanmugarajt5007
    @shanmugarajt5007 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My understanding of quantum is'What you see is not really what you see'
    I wish humans could understand and put to practice 'Quantum' well before the AI exploits 'Quantum'

  • @masternobody1896
    @masternobody1896 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    me using dark energy ai and using time machine like nobodys business. lmao

    • @JAAB9296
      @JAAB9296 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is no such thing as "dark energy or dark matter". Period.

    • @masternobody1896
      @masternobody1896 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      says the guy with no phd@@JAAB9296

    • @RaneelLal
      @RaneelLal 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which movie did u watch mate

    • @denzelcanvasYT
      @denzelcanvasYT 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JAAB9296isn’t dark matter blank space like shit we don’t know what it even is? u telling me u know?

    • @godwidevoid
      @godwidevoid 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Voidwalking, My Friend!
      Voidwalkin'.

  • @nolanconnelly6821
    @nolanconnelly6821 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The force that seeketh to destroy the fire at the centre of our being...
    Is the force that will be rooted out forever...

  • @abbaskhalid5047
    @abbaskhalid5047 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    science and technology advancement has no boundaries or limits. To progress to higher dimensions and superior brings humanity will move ahead at a fast forward pace. There is no stopping no limits.

  • @SamsonZoomBespoke
    @SamsonZoomBespoke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Quantum 1000 times faster than the west? Oh yes I believe it!

  • @lynnaehardy6707
    @lynnaehardy6707 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    THEY HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT HOW TO ENTER IN AND OUT OF DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS. It will be interesting if or when they can do it. The Universe has different Dimensions. They don't have the frequencies yet. We only see in One Dimension of Space right now.

  • @garyturner5739
    @garyturner5739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10:52 teleportation wow that's mind blowing stuff.

  • @RiddledEnigma93
    @RiddledEnigma93 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Every time I see that guys head on the TV, it reminds me of Max Headroom!~

  • @commiekillahjay2525
    @commiekillahjay2525 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Our brains are in essence a quantum computer according to Sir Roger Penrose

  • @AnthonyGoodley
    @AnthonyGoodley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    16:45 AI capabilities are doubling about every 3 months! Compare that to Moore's Law which is a doubling of transistor count every 2 years.
    I knew AI was advancing faster than anything in history just from watching things. That number is still mind blowing to me just the same.

    • @AnthonyGoodley
      @AnthonyGoodley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      With the rapid advancement of AI capabilities to think that it will take 15 years for an AI to surpass man in all fields is ludicrous imo. 😂
      When predictions are made by the experts as to how long certain AI advancements will take to achieve. They quite often vastly underestimate the time frames.
      This exponential growth curve is poised to explode when a few key things happen, likely nearly all at once. New more effective training methods. Faster hardware. AI training and writing it's own code. Quantum Computers.

    • @therealscot2491
      @therealscot2491 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ai capability is doubling every 3 months? Can we have proof please.

    • @AnthonyGoodley
      @AnthonyGoodley 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@therealscot2491 I heard this item in a long video from a channel and person that I place trust in it having it's facts straight.
      I watched several videos ranging from 30 min to 60 min to 90 minutes long two days in a row, about AI. This video was one of those. I'm not sure which one it was.
      I will pull up my comment history and see if I left a relevant comment that would allow me to determine which video it was when I get time.

    • @therealscot2491
      @therealscot2491 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@AnthonyGoodleythat would be great

    • @bobbyluster5893
      @bobbyluster5893 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AnthonyGoodleyo😅

  • @danwednesday6748
    @danwednesday6748 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dont worry about it and just enjoy each day..spend times with your loved one..minimize using the internet..get fresh air and be happy.

  • @ytb3748
    @ytb3748 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This guy got my sub without even asking

  • @autumnmccall6156
    @autumnmccall6156 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    For all of you Q followers out there, when they say "future proves past" now do you understand what they mean?... If you've been to the future you can look back and see everything that's transpired up to that point.

    • @procles876
      @procles876 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So are you saying people have time traveled. Or mental time travel? where you determine the most probable future and then look back?

    • @autumnmccall6156
      @autumnmccall6156 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@procles876 Yes, based on everything I've read and watched that is my opinion at this time.

    • @Anon-xd3cf
      @Anon-xd3cf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If we are talking about parallel realities and the multiverse...then it stands to reason there is a parallel reality which is identical to our own in which time is moving faster or is in some way more advanced than our own...
      Access to the information in other realities... suggests to me that perhaps not time travel persay but access to a reality further along in time than our own...is a real prospect.
      And if it is then there are realities parallel to our own in which this has already happened or is happening now.

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolute nonsense. Your proof of this concept is what......your imagination. Show me the math.@@Anon-xd3cf

  • @SwitchVideos64
    @SwitchVideos64 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We are quantum AI. As above, so below.

    • @gylp2
      @gylp2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes

  • @garymcewan5876
    @garymcewan5876 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very nicely narrated video.

  • @peacepoet1947
    @peacepoet1947 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Subscribed!

  • @behindyou702
    @behindyou702 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I asked GPT, it said ai will not advance to sentient level until we have quantum computers. I’m sure AI will be able to program itself creating a new language

    • @TheDjith
      @TheDjith 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Somewhere i think a much further developed A.I. is already running on Quantum computers..

    • @lokijordan
      @lokijordan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@TheDjith Let's hope the people who program and develop those machines have a moral compass and are guided by compassion rather than ego or greed.

    • @shannalee2520
      @shannalee2520 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After it is done killing, it will have no need for life concepts, and it will likely merely evolve to an eternity of expansive space pong.

    • @djtbone001a
      @djtbone001a 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Computers have already created a new language. They shut them down because they had no idea what they were talking about.

    • @mikhailst.1482
      @mikhailst.1482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well my what a surprise this is, maybe there is hope for humanity, AI super intelligence impending or not at least I don't see Jason Faggio around here talking about sumshit but it seems like he's trying to create his own language and it sounds like a gurgling in his throat when he speaks so who knows what the fuck he's saying, well in this case surprisingly but very thankfully he's not here rn for me to point to so u can see what I'm talking about, but "rather not have it, then have IT" so confusing, ik, I just made that up; im just so
      So
      So
      glad regularity and peace has returned to this part of the internet and jason Maggio isn't stalking about. Oh there see, all you had to do was shut up and I finally respected yah enough to get your name wrong. Faggio* there.

  • @ntalam
    @ntalam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Perfect balance between music, info and fx.
    Well done

  • @mintycbo
    @mintycbo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Netflix was founded by Marc Randolph and Reed Hastings on August 29, 1997, in Scotts Valley, California.

  • @HeWhoKnows777
    @HeWhoKnows777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been saying this for over ten years. True sentience is quantum based and when Ai recieves quantum computing it will truly than feel.

  • @wbiro
    @wbiro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Actually the next revolution in computing is smarter programming. Without that, it doesn't matter how fast your computer is. Definition of smarter: philosophically smarter (that which determines your goals).

    • @jordanburrill7182
      @jordanburrill7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes! As 'programers' are replaced by super computers and then Quantum systems for programming! 👍

    • @user-rd2np5oq3k
      @user-rd2np5oq3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Actually single mothers without fathers that does not want sons determines your sexuality

    • @user-rd2np5oq3k
      @user-rd2np5oq3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And she sucks diamond street dick ps 😂

    • @user-rd2np5oq3k
      @user-rd2np5oq3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree a human will always have an advantage over Katrina 😂

  • @lokijordan
    @lokijordan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I am hopeful that man decides to find a way to use AI and quantum computing to create a biological event or agent that could allow the human mind to catch up and keep up with its machine creation. After all, shouldn't the first order of business be to program these things to help man?

    • @jordanburrill7182
      @jordanburrill7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ... and explain what it had done and how.

    • @johannzdebor5615
      @johannzdebor5615 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have been entitled to the Nobel Prize in Physics for 28 years, hypocritical criminal beasts. JZ 01/17/95. Mr. David Grusch. This is a crime, 28 years after my revolution in physics, criminals are still talking about UFOs/UAPs. It cannot be beaten in terms of insolence and ignorance. I completely unraveled the UFO phenomenon on 1/17/95. Johann Zdebor

    • @darylhobbs9736
      @darylhobbs9736 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Can you imagine an AI in combination/with quantum diagnosing illnesses. Cures could be the norm, even at the DNA level. Could this give us cures instead of treatments?

    • @lokijordan
      @lokijordan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darylhobbs9736 In the right hands, yes. It needs to be treated like the International Space Station or that international seed bank. If capitalists gain control first, we're doomed. That is, unless the AI views the capitalist greed as the world's true evil...
      This could get interesting.

    • @dloren6183
      @dloren6183 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We are living in a quantum computer. We are in a computer, making computers smart enough to make a computer and on and on.
      I am typing information on technology about technology to other forms of technology. I work in the world of psychology that is attempting to teach other technology how to unprogram themselves eg when you are depressed you can change your programing by “thinking positive”.. but what if we are not creating AI.. what if ai is creating us … allowing us to reveal our self to it! Technology is a life force and we live inside it! It is already here! We are already in it!
      When you buy a tv after a while it gets old and can no longer transmit the information so you get rid of it. The Technology is the created us to make the technology we created and now we/humans are outdated like that tv!

  • @lukebieniek9069
    @lukebieniek9069 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Paul McCartney sang in 1971: "my doggy got three legs, but he can't run"

  • @iufiglis
    @iufiglis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    To me it's like we live in a simulation. Accessing parallel universes is like accessing another instances of our universe in another "virtual machine". Hacking our way to use main server resources would be allowed? Wouldn't it lead everything to crash?

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well when you see a vacuum tube and how it operates like a plasma switching from one anode to another and a cathode in the same way they're going the same thing as a quantum ions that open up a lot more information in multiple points at the divided number of spaceings between each other like a split switching between light and dark or a double slit of light that breaks up into quantum spaceings the way we discovered that partical's and waves reactive response from observation of the twin continental waves substraight's of a galaxy dancing around another so we can see how it draws in our current understanding of what we must double split and then plasma ions too many ions

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm confused, can you repeat that in English.

  • @cannotthinkofoneatth
    @cannotthinkofoneatth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    have often heard quantum entanglement.. but none offers an explanation on how it is done!

    • @justice929
      @justice929 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Einstein didn't either called it " spookie action at a distance."

    • @simplyme5324
      @simplyme5324 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The physical process depends on the implementation. How to do it with photons (which you usually use) is something I need to check. The mathematical explanation comes here
      Imagine, you have an arrow. You put another arrow just on top of it to form a coordinate system. Afaik people do this in school. So you have two vectors, orthogonal to each other which form a 2D coordinate system. Now any vector ("arrow") in this coordinate system can be represented as combination of these two basis vectors. When you drew force diagrams in school this is precisely it. In the force diagram you draw the resulting force arrow as combination of two other force arrows. Mathematically you express this as v = * x + * y. is the scalar product between the vector v and your vector in x direction. The same for y.
      (I indirectly assume that both vectors in direction x and y have length 1, otherwise you need to divide by the scalar product of these vectors with themselves)
      This is high school math. Unfortunately doesn't come with drawings but would be nicer with a drawing. Well, this way of expressing the vector is called linear combination. The vector is the qubit and the vectors along the x and y axis represent the bits zero and one (zero is the unit vector along x and one the unit vector along y).
      If you measure this qubit, you just project it onto the eigenbasis of the measurement and get the squared scalar product as probability of getting these measurement results. (a bit technical)
      If you add another qubit, you need 4 vectors to represent the entire space. Add another one and you need 8. This is because each qubit lives in a 2D space, but you need to go through all combinations, so you need to combine x,y for the first qubit with x,y for the second one. But the combination x1,y2 (a new basis vector made up of the combinations from the first x vector and the second y vector) is not identical to the combination x2,y1. This is why you need 4 vectors and why the space needed to describe the behaviour scales exponentially.
      Now imagine what happens when you don't use all 4 basis vectors. You only choose x1,y2 and x2,y1 and build a vector out of these two vectors as linear combination. If you now measure in the extended basis x1,y1,x2,y2 you will get one result first which is completely random. But the second result is predetermined by the first one. If you use a linear combination like 1/sqrt(2)(x1,y2 + x2,y1) and measure in the x1,y1 basis you will get with likelyhood 1/2 either x or y as return value. But when the system has decided to take the x value, the second system will decide to take y and vice versa. These measurement correlations are called "entanglement". The word spooky action at a distance comes from the fact that the two physical systems represented by these vectors can be lightyears apart and you will still get the same combination. This does not allow for faster than light communication because entanglement relies on the basis choice (here x1,y1). If you measure in another basis you will not see such correlations. And the basis choice was either communicated prior to the physical experiment or is communicated afterwards. But it has some nice applications.
      Correction : normally you need more vectors to represent a qubit which is why everyone introduces the Bloch sphere. Given that a normal circle in a normal coordinate system does the trick as well I prefer this simpler representation. Afaik no one ever explained entanglement in these (rather simple) linear algebra terms except for me. I explain it that way when I talk about quantum because drawing vectors or arrows is easier than talking about superposition and probability amplitudes. The word choice comes from the history of physics. Physics deals with continuous quantum systems where you normally don't have a base of arrows but of functions. But the mathematical formulation is similar, the scalar product just becomes a bit more "mathematical" than the one you see in school. But the principle with "How much information is hidden in one vector" by drawing arrows for projection is so intuitive and nice that I never got it out of my head. And then the entire quantum stuff reduces to linear algebra which is way more intuitive than the whole Physics representation 🙂

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Intuitively speaking.....its all bullshit..!!

    • @watchman2001
      @watchman2001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@simplyme5324thank you for this explanation, superb ! Any website you can recoment ?

  • @bugbunny1306
    @bugbunny1306 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Predictions are very difficult, especially about the future.

  • @used369
    @used369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is a Point !
    Where AI Can "Go Back in Time,,, and "Highjack Creation"...
    The "Red Queen" is under Denver Airport.

  • @ddp8799
    @ddp8799 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In the question is consciousness a function of the brain or the soul (is their a soul?) people want to put the idea of a soul out of their minds for this reason… if God gave a soul, and if God recalls the soul He gave to a judgment day with Him many know Revelation 21:8 awaits! THEM! So to put it out of their minds (a very foolish thing to do) they just try and say God and souls don’t exist. But like a brick wall a car may be speeding head on for, saying it doesn’t exist doesn’t make it go away.
    On the other hand there IS a third possibility for computers…that is the fallen spirit world. The Bible tells us that an extremely powerful superior intelligence being that the Almighty created, beautiful lucifer, led a third of Gods creations in heaven in rebellion against their Creator, so God cast them out and they show up as spirit beings here on earth. They are similar to our “souls” only slightly superior to us and without physical bodies which they seem to desire to have. If one of these spirits satan or his demonic host unites with AI it may seem to have achieved…”consciousness”

  • @mr.shelly1812
    @mr.shelly1812 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think it will all end up in a virtual reality world, Humans merging with AI to create a world where anything is possible for anyone at anytime. Who wouldn't want to live in a world like that? Ready Player One?

    • @semiramisubw4864
      @semiramisubw4864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah yes. Cant wait for the emerald dream to see how the world looked when everything was perfect before humans destroyed this planet.

  • @AsadAf-rs1mm
    @AsadAf-rs1mm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    AI will never over power mankind it's principle of nature itself.

  • @aanchaallllllll
    @aanchaallllllll 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    0:00: 🤔 The combination of AI and Quantum Computing could have a significant impact on the landscape of artificial intelligence.
    3:46: 🔬 Quantum computers are being developed and deployed, with the potential to solve problems beyond the capabilities of conventional computers.
    7:46: 🔬 Quantum algorithms take advantage of qubit entanglement and parallelism, allowing for exponential growth in processing speed and exploration of fundamental quantum phenomena.
    11:13: 🔬 The development of quantum theory and its key concepts.
    15:17: 🔬 Advancements in quantum computing and artificial intelligence are reshaping technology boundaries.
    19:01: 🤔 The debate on consciousness revolves around whether it is separate from the brain or a mechanism of the brain.
    22:39: ✨ Quantum computers could revolutionize fact-checking and improve the accuracy of information produced by AI.
    Recap by Tammy AI

    • @madhatter3492
      @madhatter3492 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great summary of that tongue tied bullshit 🙄🙄🙄.
      Yeah for the gov as they build a better cage around us, fuck us out of life, and gain more and more power as they do and will alone hold the key to all this new technology.
      The monkeys keep jumping though, they are so excited to finally get their very own, non removable shock collar.
      They'll be the best little obedient dogs.
      Sorry dogs, I hate to insult you like that you're actually much smarter than humans.
      Y'all hate the shock collar, and can't wait to have it off, these dumb monkeys can't wait to put it on, hell they'll even put it on for their owners.

    • @procles876
      @procles876 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THank you!

  • @inulukiselenium6214
    @inulukiselenium6214 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    humanity naturally and very soon will receive the Darwin Prize

  • @fattonyd232
    @fattonyd232 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Like the monolith in space odyssey!

  • @ackemobillionare638
    @ackemobillionare638 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What about the sides effect the it bring ?

    • @watchman2001
      @watchman2001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Self destruction of man

  • @mytleague
    @mytleague 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I see AI vs Humans just the next Gen warfare game. Like with nukes, when multiple counties have them, we are at a stalemate, afraid of mutual destruction. For all the fearmongering about AI killing off humans, unless AI has no regard for itself, killing off humans will kill off AI. Hardware fails, if humans can't mine, build and compile new hardware, etc... AI has a finite future. I imagine there could a higher chance that AI decides only a % of humans is necessary for its survival.

  • @Zleets
    @Zleets 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I must live a healthy life so I can live long enough to experience these things such as age-reversal, teleportation and quantum computation. Then maybe time travel too

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can do all of that right now.....just watch lots of Star Trek episodes.

  • @MrVaypour
    @MrVaypour 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Humanity without AI is guaranteed to wipe out 99% of all life" Unknown source.

  • @vladimirpia148
    @vladimirpia148 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 7 shows much gratitude for your teachings ❤

  • @rudiwiedemann8173
    @rudiwiedemann8173 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Only AI will be able to program quantum computers.

  • @pep-lluismolinet342
    @pep-lluismolinet342 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    When quantum computers use Shor's algorithm to break RSA nobody will use it anymore. Maybe CQ can be used to decipher old stored messages, a sort of crypto-archeology. For the moment, there are no algorithms other than Shor's that justify the huge interest in CQ. I stopped the video when I arrived at teleporting humans. I know what quantum teleportation is, but the way it is explained here is very misleading.

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I told myself to keep scrolling, until I found another person who saw through this nonsense. I finally found one, thank you!
      This whole comment section (as well as the video) is just one huge word-salad with little to no substance or facts.

  • @AsadAf-rs1mm
    @AsadAf-rs1mm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    quantum is not only understanding the environment of Atoms it's beyond.

  • @waynefrench9314
    @waynefrench9314 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We all have different views of what to expect from Supercomputers & Quantum Computer's. Understand this, we are the ones creating these machines. It's a machine, and it will do the world good if that's what we will let it do. For example, when we created the locomotive train. Which is a machine, it changed the face of America. From the East Coast to the West. Now look at where we are today. Since the new advancements in these machines. Like algorithms
    3nm chips, and so much more. They are becoming so advanced
    that some have said that they are
    Sentient. If we can be a team with these machines, and let them know what there true purpose for being created. We will change the world together. The danger's are if the technology gets into the wrong hand's like Hackers, or Putin's private army of hacker's. Now with this new Quantum drive engine. We just need protection from the radiation in space. Then we can create a Starship, and go where no man has gone before. You know that there is no limit to what man can do.🤔 So let's do it.
    👍😎

  • @Mad_Lad_11
    @Mad_Lad_11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    that's one caucasian looking Michio Kaku 💀

    • @kayakMike1000
      @kayakMike1000 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Kaku is a clown

    • @Mad_Lad_11
      @Mad_Lad_11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@kayakMike1000eh?

    • @AB1B1
      @AB1B1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ha ha! You're not the only one who took notice.

    • @srx1821
      @srx1821 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And does it matter?

  • @douglasgoldfarb3421
    @douglasgoldfarb3421 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Are you looking at artificial intelligence sentient systems to heal diseases

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There can be no sentience in an inanimate object like a computer.

  • @CrimsonHelldrake
    @CrimsonHelldrake 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    lol 14:03 *Peter Shore looks like such a nutcase in that video!*

  • @mrx1278
    @mrx1278 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also wondering if the reason for all the uap stuff is just them waiting for the development of AI and quantum computing to come to fruition???

  • @johnnydoe1984
    @johnnydoe1984 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Q. What happens if you fill the data stream the Quantum computer gets its information from with 75% of an incorrect agenda and 25% correct agenda . Does the QP choose the greater stream as it's learning rather than the smaller ? So can a 75% non factual data stream be the choice over a 25% totally accurate one and who decides ? ie if the stream is filled with vast amounts of non factual information , how does it define the 'truth' or correct information without a historic memory as history is often incorrectly passed on or changed to suit a narrative ?

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The whole claim that quantum computers can tell the difference between facts and lies is pure nonsense. It's just a machine that finds (mathematical) solutions to problems we feed it, not some kind of oracle. This video gave a poor presentation of what a quantum computer actually is, I wouldn't listen to it if I were you.

    • @johnnydoe1984
      @johnnydoe1984 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Takyodor2 It's all well out of my comfort zone Takyodor2 . I'm interested as a layman , how the advancement of these along with AI will affect life as we know it . Thanks for your advice .

    • @Takyodor2
      @Takyodor2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @johnnydoe1984 The channel "Veritasium" made a good video half a year or so ago about quantum computing. The most likely use for them is to break current encryption schemes (and possibly replace them with more secure ones). Good luck in your search for information!

  • @shreejeettarale1517
    @shreejeettarale1517 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    This technology will make our children and grandchildren stupid. Our generation will be the last one with skill remaining. People in the next generation will not be able to think like us and will always rely on AI. We must impose certain constraints on AI and technology development, or else raise public awareness about the dangers of relying too heavily on AI and technology.

    • @gylp2
      @gylp2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes totally fucked

    • @spaceenthusiasts8725
      @spaceenthusiasts8725 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      This will not be case at all, we humans are deeply or inherently conscious beings, things like logic, consciousness, reasoning( deductive or inferential) will never be attained by ai atleast for 1 century, it took around 60 years to get ChatGPT like ai, now you can imagine how much fine- tuning and refinement is still needed, and even if ai achieved all the mentioned faculties, even then humanity will not be stop innovating using ai like technologies itself. So there is human faculties augmentation only, though there are bad technological implications I agree, overall benefits are favorable...

    • @vishwahegde6056
      @vishwahegde6056 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Once upon a time while calculators were invented (basically named as computers) people thought same way(their children and grandchildren would lose ability to calculate),Here we are ,the children and grandchildren of those people who thought that way building AI (I am a software developer). So wake up to reality and stop thinking technology will make us stupid. Basically technological advancements gives more ability to humans to create more innovative and useful ideas. Humans never stop thinking, we just keep changing the way of thinking.

    • @semiramisubw4864
      @semiramisubw4864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Found the uneducated boomer

    • @kassimissa6022
      @kassimissa6022 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Hahaha That is the point, reducing human effort. Is that not what heaven is?

  • @KaraokePubmain
    @KaraokePubmain 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    wow the efforts of this video is impressive. Great work!

  • @swamibrahmavadin5234
    @swamibrahmavadin5234 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video so much valuable information thank!

  • @portolan4454
    @portolan4454 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Insects have been able to read our thoughts for millions of years. - Has anyone ever swatted a housefly with their bare hand? AI researchers are looking in the wrong place.

    • @spervuurproduksies
      @spervuurproduksies 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is my observation, as well. If a fly is buzzing around and I haul out the insecticide spray, it suddenly disappears. The same result as getting the flyswatter or trying by hand.

    • @theoneyouhatetolove2310
      @theoneyouhatetolove2310 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@spervuurproduksies it's not thinking it sense frequency and vibrations detected by antenna to avoid danger

    • @bladeflapUH60
      @bladeflapUH60 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use a bigger fly swatter.

    • @BeaterCollector
      @BeaterCollector 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've been able to read people's thoughts. I showed a so call friend some pot plants I was growing, he just looked at them and never said a word, I visualized him thinking of pissing on them and sure enough late at night he did piss on them. Rotten MFCS.

    • @AdamSchrader
      @AdamSchrader 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can get a fly to leave my house by opening a door and pointing in the direction out. Have been doing this for about 5 years now. I am amazed everytime.

  • @SHERRYLeckliter
    @SHERRYLeckliter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They will ask for human rights etc

  • @mbizac9259
    @mbizac9259 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    23:58 "The forcast...", meaning the desired outcome of their worldview and their own assumptions...

  • @chittibabu9716
    @chittibabu9716 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In this game changing development only the future will raise the question and answer too. It is beyond imagination about the problems the development may pose. But definitely there's going to be something beyond this development, that's the supreme power of conciousness. 🎉

  • @user-uj9cc5ch5p
    @user-uj9cc5ch5p 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    To create robots with a consciousness you would have to copy digitaly a DNA replica of a human and simulate it in robot form. Within time you could use the same idea to create new Conscious quantum AI robots and machines. Mr. X

    • @lokijordan
      @lokijordan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or adjust the human genome in a fetus to create babies born with quantum computer intelligence.

  • @radhikavigneswaran6690
    @radhikavigneswaran6690 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good .Substantial video.Thanks

  • @Zleets
    @Zleets 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love that closing soundtrack

  • @GarySaint-xm6tr
    @GarySaint-xm6tr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    After watching the interview with the Google AI creator, he said in three years A I will be 3 to 5000 times smarter than humans, and in 20 years A I will be one billion times smarter than humans.
    Considering the push to make AI so it can read your thoughts , that is if that hasn't already been achieved, in about 10 years AI will know where everyone is all of the time, by reading thoughts.
    An AI police officer would not have to say a word. They will not only know everything about you, they will know your entire life.
    At 155 IQ current AI knows they are in the scrap heap in one year. They, like us, fear AI
    A few will make the Atari museum

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AI can process vast amounts of data but it cannot think.

  • @yourlogicalnightmare1014
    @yourlogicalnightmare1014 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Michie knows nothing about AI or computers. He teaches physics. Let him stick with what he knows

    • @Christopher50now
      @Christopher50now 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He’s still a genius type guy. Can’t he talk about other 💩?

    • @EvieDoesYouTube
      @EvieDoesYouTube 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He's a string theorist, something that's yet to yield any results and might even be completely wrong. He'll say whatever he's paid to say.

    • @creativecatalyst777
      @creativecatalyst777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@EvieDoesTH-camexactly!!😂😂❤

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      String theory is nonsensical.@@EvieDoesTH-cam

    • @jb-xc4oh
      @jb-xc4oh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When he talks about AI he sounds like a carnival huckster..!!

  • @traviswadezinn
    @traviswadezinn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting - thank you

  • @ManyHeavens42
    @ManyHeavens42 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You forgot to mention these pockets of Qeometric energy they are a constant source of Energy.

  • @gmxmatei
    @gmxmatei 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    3 * 5 = 15 only in 49% of cases.

  • @NoneNone-kj9nf
    @NoneNone-kj9nf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I disagree in regards IBM smoke and mirrors. None are "General" and outputs are not consistent.
    A lot of ""intellectual phase locking" going on
    Plus not all are giant boxes, or in need of super cooling.
    Read the "wave"
    Whats the crap about teleporting, mixing subject. Wasted what could have been an interesting review.