King's Indian Defense, Petrosian System (Computer4-Impossible) - Standard chess #23
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
- Join the site, and add me as a friend. :) bit.ly/2Sg21sy
I played a standard chess game as white with time controls set at 15 minutes with a 2 second increment against Computer4-Impossible. The opening played was the King's Indian Defense, Petrosian System. We have the typical play of a King's Indian Defense with white playing on the queenside, and black playing on the kingside. White's potential positive in this game is a space advantage on the queenside, whereas for black it's the bishop pair.
PGN:
1. Nf3 g6 2. c4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. d4 e5 5. d5 Nf6 6. e4 O-O 7. Be2 a5 8. O-O Na6 9. Ne1 Bd7 10. Nd3 Nb4 11. Be3 Nxd3 12. Qxd3 Ng4 13. Bxg4 Bxg4 14. c5 Qe7 15. cxd6 cxd6 16. Na4 f5 17. f3 fxe4 18. fxe4 Qh4 19. Nb6 Rad8 20. Qd2 h6 21. Rf2 Bh5 22. Qd3 g5 23. Nc4 Bg6 24. Nd2 Qg4 25. Rc1 Rc8 26. Rxf8+ Bxf8 27. Rxc8 Qxc8 28. Nf1 b5 29. h3 Qc4 30. Qxc4 bxc4 31. Ng3 a4 32. Kf2 Kf7 33. Nf5 Bxf5 34. exf5 Bg7 35. Bc1 Kf6 36. g4 e4 37. Bd2 Kf7 38. Ke3 Bxb2 39. Kxe4 c3 40. Bxg5 hxg5 41. Kd3 Kf6 42. Kc2 Ke5 43. Kd3 Kxd5 44. Kc2 Kc4 45. f6 d5 46. f7 Ba3
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who learned how to play from my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on TH-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :D
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+Che...
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
One disadvantage of playing a fast-playing computer is that you have to do all of your thinking about the position on your own clock.
Another instructive game. Thanks
Kind of shocked you missed Bc3. Seems like a move you always find naturally in your games. Everyone has oversights, though! But well played to get an advantage against the comp! You'll get it next time!
How do you integrate the stockfish 7 with the chess.com analysis board?
Editing trick
I think this is one of the best time controls for you to comment a game, keep it up!
Tough game, Jerry. Thanks for the great video!
Thanks Terdlings! :D
I wonder if you could have played f3 earlier. Since you only played it after black's f5, black didn't have to react to the threat on the bishop on g4 in the game. So, you could've gotten a similar position to that in the game, but with black's bishop on d7 instead of g4, which would have prevented the idea of rerouting the bishop to g6 to attack e4.
I love how at the end you're all "I was hoping the computer would make a mistake" and "why suggest that? I don't get it!". It's funny how after we've finally found a computer algorithm that plays chess we completely abandon ourselves to its judgement. I thought the whole point of this series is how to play like a human.
How does the computer determine what move to play cause its not always playing the best moves...
it doesn't calculate deeply.
Who else falls asleep to Jerry videos? (not being rude, just find them relaxing!)
Me
Lol you do always sound sleepy
i would love to see a chess game from jerry every single evening...would be so cool!
I do everytime
JimmyIsTheBest1 literally every night lol
Jerry how could you not play C3!!!! You were playing so well!
It's funny that I am not as good a player as you are, but I saw bishop c3 pretty easily. I thought I was mistaken.
The observer sees more than the player. The former has an objective point of view, while the latter a subjective one. This is why in Russia, a kibitzer loses their left nut!
These are my favorite.
Congrats! 1st place confetti to you for commenting! :D
I'm so jealous.
I too like these best, Shared first with analysis of other games (GM super tournaments etc)
The initial position of a chess game is drawn and one will only be able to win if "allowed". If you opponent plays as good as you, it is unrealistic to play for a win. On the other hand, if losing is not that important, we can always push it a little.
That's not been proven yet.
spassky vs fischer disproves your hypothesis
Care to elaborate for the lesser folk?
That is false. Initial chess position has large enough numerical variations (of equal to close to equal positions, lets not forget that LOTS of variations and their moves are losing garbage moves) are still too much for our computational machines to decide whether chess is a tie like ticktacktoe. There is no proof, yet it feels like it. Same can be said about religion and also some science like the Big Bang Theory. Don't come across asserting things that are not assertable.
well forlks, first of all my theory is not false because if it's true that hasn't been proven, it's also true that it hasn't been disproven. And no, spassky vs fischer doesn't disprove it.
19:00 Bishop C3
Time, Jerry!! Time!
Why are you simplifying when playing against the computer? You eliminated the knights, you could have locked down the pawns. Why open the game when it has the bishop pair? BTW, I saw the Bc3 move. I think you beat yourself here :)
Simplifying against a computer is often a good way to outplay it in the endgame. Old programs were famous for their endgame weakness.
surprised its rating is so low in 15 minute. i remember it being 2400 in 5 minute.
it barely uses any time, so the less time the human player has to think, the better it is for the computer.
6 of June ... Viktor Korchnoï is dead ... :(
Most of my games against the engines follows this path.Play solidly all game and then one small mistake or even a minor positional error and it crushes you.
No it only outcalculates you.
@11:20 A fork, actually.
whole time im screaming Bc3 Bc3
Slow!