Just curious - do you mean Charles Darwin - or Richard Dawkins, in teaching or explaining science? Because of you have either of the two - you not really learning any science at all
Can you please explain to me just what Charles liu is so great in - is it how he explains the universe, astronomy - what? Because believe me there is no science and what he or Neil Tyson explains. - Sorry to burst your bubble, but they are lying and charlatans who look to their religion which they call evolution - and evolution contradicts science in every way.
No my friend - if you knew the truth of what these guys project to the audience - you wouldn't want any of it there is no science between these two - and the whole concept of evolution contradicts science in every way
On point with the simulation question. One of my favorite D&D moments. Someone was running a perception check with no real reason as the character could clearly see everything that was going on but they wanted to be sure. So the DM said " for a second as you are searching and checking you notice for a split second you are on a giants table. Your party members appear to be statues not moving and you notice 5 giants sitting around the table. You come back to reality a split second later."
Man that discussion about the brain lighting up when you're in love and trying to fake it was intense. I was trying to listen to the podcast while falling asleep but it's all too engrossing. What an episode. 🔥
Sorry to hear that you believe these two - clowns - as champions of the science realm. We could all learn a lot more of the truth - if not for these two clowns and others like them. Four they suppress the truth - and bring about pathetic theory illusions - which they call evolution if you want the truth - look to God and the Bible - then look into creationism, which explains how everything came about - and believe me you will see a great difference - in the end you'll know why you have been cheated and lied to
I usually watch Startalk to calm myself before sleep. However, when i hear these four doing CQ episode, i grab a beer and laugh my bottom off with the fellas.
Sir, you've made me wonder what it would be like to have a duo presidency, and how would that would be ran. That has nothing to do with anything but, Neil and Chuck for 2024! Made me think of that.
Glad you liked it but - sorry to burst your bubble - - - all of it was a lie the base these theories on evolution - a theory in which contradicts signs in every way
YES! WE are looking up with AI! I can't wait! And I love all three of you! And also you guys still have the simulation idea backwards! How can we tell we are in a simulation if we are the simulation and the simulation itself created it's own laws of physics!
So ... what does the simulation do when the occupants invent things the simulation didn't allow for? If the occupants invent a James Webb space telescope, what happens when the astronomers aim it at an unobserved part of the sky? Do extra galaxies appear into the simulation? Or were they always there? If a young genius cosmologist comes along, with an unexpected theory of the universe that the simulation never included, does the simulation extend with new aspects of physical laws that match the guy's theory? Or is something introduced that will prove him wrong?
Neil and Charles just know how to articulate science to science enthusiast or even the common curious person with this amazing velvet touch. They break everything down without getting rid of the wonder and science of what is actually happening. Which is why Startalk is special. ❤
Chuck and Gary are just as important of course. They bring their own curiosity into it. Chuck actually asked that collision question, something Id always been curious about myself.
Fantastic guest. My center of the universe “understanding” described @ 32:45 is a marching band. The marchers in the center of the ring march much slower than the ones at the outside of the ring, so naturally because we have to define our view as the center, the universe expansion should appear faster at it’s furthest points from our observations. Am I close?
Sorry to burst your bubble - but that was all a lie - the whole concept and theory of evolution - is a lie, based on a mystical fairytale religion - called evolution
❤Charles at 34:00 makes more sense. Others may see it however they see fit, but our basic blueprint that has always been, both when Neil talks how about things -life creation on earth and the ways galaxies give birth to new stars. This is the way our ancestors describe things -As Above, So Below. Our observable universe, and everything within it looks like the design of a living cell and we can see that resemblance. So the mirroring effect that Dr. Levin was trying to compare sounds more like the dividing of cells, and each cell replicating an exact copy of itself for its specific function, but each cell copy being a different universe, each universe a different dimension. That just feels more logical than the balloon theory being a single point that simply expands. Everything that we know in our reality splits and divides countless times. The Zinc Spark wouldn't this be like the big bang, but on a smaller scale? And after this, division of individual (cells) galaxies begins. This pattern is literally in everything. Even in our way of creating societies. So if we are made of star stuff, then this is in our blueprint. You can't say it would be different for the universe, when we are the universe. If my egg just expanded after its big spark, but never divides it would probably just rupture and die. Because it couldn't divide.
30 minutes in, and uhh... Not sure why it's a "sports edition." Which is way fine with me, but yeah. 🤷♀️ Edit: Great video. Learned a few things. I love StarTalk, have been watching for years, and still look forward to each episode.
How do you know what's the glitch is, if everything you know is simulated? In other words, how can you tell what's not real when you never knew what reality looks like?
Interesting talk about love, but I think love is a decision. You can love anyone, no matter how undeserving, if you decide to. Hate works the same way. These emotions aren't caused by others, they are our own reactions to other people. Causation starts, in my view, in the brain and not with externalities.
For a moment there, I thought Charles Liu was going to say, "Now that the Hubble has been humbled, we use the James Webb." So let's all refer to it as the Humble Space Telescope.
AI should categorize all repeated spectrum gradient of frequencies, if it repeats but in multiple distances then we got a new set of what is possible in the universe. Could some of the data show echoes of, say, a black hole, with signatures so scattered it covers a huge portion of the sky
Neil, I have to admit that I’m slow on the uptake. I need teachers and others to hand hold me through the learning process. I struggle with remote learning, and math has been too difficult. I need a teacher in the room to hand hold me to the finish line. Life has been too difficult and exacted a high price from me. I don’t even feel like talking to anyone after the Covid crisis. I need teachers and aides who can support me directly through the learning process.
18:50 Using Charles and Neil’s logic for checking if you are not in a simulation- then our Dreams/Nightmares may qualify as glitches in the simulation (defy physics, inconsistent reality) -or- maybe 🤔 our Dreams/Nightmares are actually simulations created by our brains 🧠
I 'love' this episode And could it be considered logical love? like even without empathy you could probably still decide to treat someone a certain way right? Same thing like when your mad at someone and you tell them you love them anyways😂😂
The description of a sociopath mimicking the performance of love is eerily similar to autistic masking. Emotional abuse victims have funky brain chemistry/performative emotions too. Love is a psychiatric piazza.
I watched a video about 2 weeks ago that presented a good theory about the Black Hole exiting at high speed & creating stars in it wake was: 3 galaxies colliding & the 3-body gravity interaction to throw 1 black hole out at high speed.
💙26:28 Charles: "Depends on what you think love is..." What if we are in a love laboratory? Exploring love in all possible conditions, directions, dimensions...e.g. hydrogen in loving relationship with oxygen, (what a couple!), chlorine in love with sodium giving a salt of the earth. From the love that holds the nucleus together (and evil scientists relentlessly attempting to smash that bond 😀) to the comingling of galaxies and multiverses? What if limitless love (consciousness, Light and Sound according to ancient wisdom) is the basic fabric of all that exists, exploring Itself from various levels of limitations, e.g. the human package of perceptions? Experiment to test this using an ancient sonic tuning fork *HU* to raise personal vibrations. Search how to sing *HU* .
neural networks are the basis of deep learning. As Charles said, they're still far simpler than the brain, but we can manipulate them even more easily :)
In a way you're right - manipulating the brain is far easier than know of - just like Neil Tyson does every day - he spews out lies and disinformation about the universe and science altogether - there is no truth no facts of what the states, in trying to explain the universe - that is because the use and go by their religion they call evolution so yes - they to manipulate the brain very easily - the indoctrination starts at grade school - and up to the universities.
Apologies if this is a draft question, if everything flew out in all directions from the big bang singularity, how do we now get galaxies on collision courses from different directions?
I just realised something - We are assuming our reality is something special or realistic or as good as it gets - so anything below that would be glitches - what we call a good enough simulation may be small sauce for a real reality if this was a simulation - it might just be good enough for us.
The way Charles explains is somewhat mesmerizing. Wish I had a science teacher like him
he doesn't do it for me
You're telling us! 🤩
Just curious - do you mean Charles Darwin - or Richard Dawkins, in teaching or explaining science?
Because of you have either of the two - you not really learning any science at all
@@ceaserusa4771 Look what the cat dragged in.
I agree......
Charles seems already to be in a higher dimension of knowledge! Great to have him on the show!
He is way past the close minded Neil!
@@a.j.infowars7582 I love Niel but I have to agree to some extent- thinking outside the box is what got us here
@@a.j.infowars7582 fellow infowarrior
Charles Liu, StarTalk All-Star (among many other prestigious accolades!). Love it when he's on the show!
Can you please explain to me just what Charles liu is so great in - is it how he explains the universe, astronomy - what?
Because believe me there is no science and what he or Neil Tyson explains. - Sorry to burst your bubble, but they are lying and charlatans who look to their religion which they call evolution - and evolution contradicts science in every way.
Charles Lou and Janna Levin ftw
Wish this episode was 10x longer seriously.
No my friend - if you knew the truth of what these guys project to the audience - you wouldn't want any of it
there is no science between these two - and the whole concept of evolution contradicts science in every way
Charles Liu and Heather Berlin are my all time favorite guests!
On point with the simulation question. One of my favorite D&D moments. Someone was running a perception check with no real reason as the character could clearly see everything that was going on but they wanted to be sure. So the DM said " for a second as you are searching and checking you notice for a split second you are on a giants table. Your party members appear to be statues not moving and you notice 5 giants sitting around the table. You come back to reality a split second later."
Man that discussion about the brain lighting up when you're in love and trying to fake it was intense. I was trying to listen to the podcast while falling asleep but it's all too engrossing. What an episode. 🔥
Charles Liu AND Neil degrasse Tyson ARE THE CHAMPIONS OF SCIENCE!!
Sorry to hear that you believe these two - clowns - as champions of the science realm.
We could all learn a lot more of the truth - if not for these two clowns and others like them.
Four they suppress the truth - and bring about pathetic theory illusions - which they call evolution
if you want the truth - look to God and the Bible - then look into creationism, which explains how everything came about - and believe me you will see a great difference - in the end you'll know why you have been cheated and lied to
Check out Dr. Charles Liu's podcast, 'Into The Liuniverse': www.youtube.com/@TheLIUniverse
Great episode! Charles was so articulate and easy to understand.
I usually watch Startalk to calm myself before sleep. However, when i hear these four doing CQ episode, i grab a beer and laugh my bottom off with the fellas.
My favourite line-up! Charles Liu is amazing!
I come back to this episode every two or three months just to listen to Charles and Neil argue about love 😂. Love the wild debates on these episodes
Charles Liu, Chuck Nice and Gary O'Reilly! Such a party! 🥳
And of course, Dr. Tyson saying he knows what love is... 😎
Charles dropping the sci-fi pop culture references and info. I like it!
Charles episodes are so dope! And Chuck is here, top notch episode
Charles LIU I LOVE THIS MAN and his explanations of anything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This episode was absolutely phenomenal. Listening to intelligent people respectfully debate/cross ideas is so satisfying ❤
Neil and Chuck for 2024
Sir, you've made me wonder what it would be like to have a duo presidency, and how would that would be ran. That has nothing to do with anything but, Neil and Chuck for 2024! Made me think of that.
Love when Charles on the show!
This episode was Amazing! I wish all people could debate as respectfully as you all.
I LOVE STAR TALK…..these conversations make You want more…..Enjoy how anyone can comprehend the explanation to all the questions……
That was an awesome episode. Me just binge watching all of them lol. Wonderful job ! Bravo!
Glad you liked it but - sorry to burst your bubble - - - all of it was a lie
the base these theories on evolution - a theory in which contradicts signs in every way
Getting sharper every day Chuck!!
Excellent episode!!
Fantastic episode!!!
Thank you for answering my question!! It was amazing :)
YES! WE are looking up with AI! I can't wait! And I love all three of you! And also you guys still have the simulation idea backwards! How can we tell we are in a simulation if we are the simulation and the simulation itself created it's own laws of physics!
So ... what does the simulation do when the occupants invent things the simulation didn't allow for? If the occupants invent a James Webb space telescope, what happens when the astronomers aim it at an unobserved part of the sky? Do extra galaxies appear into the simulation? Or were they always there? If a young genius cosmologist comes along, with an unexpected theory of the universe that the simulation never included, does the simulation extend with new aspects of physical laws that match the guy's theory? Or is something introduced that will prove him wrong?
@@netgnostic1627 They simply watch and learn to see how they evolve. It all started from a small 'big bang' as they like to call it.
oh yeah, absolutely my favorite episode so far!
Neil and Charles just know how to articulate science to science enthusiast or even the common curious person with this amazing velvet touch. They break everything down without getting rid of the wonder and science of what is actually happening. Which is why Startalk is special. ❤
Chuck and Gary are just as important of course. They bring their own curiosity into it. Chuck actually asked that collision question, something Id always been curious about myself.
That Black Mirror episode Neil mentioned is legendary!!
I like how Gary has a Cosmic Queries book behind him!
The glitches being paranormal was also a point of interest in the second matrix from.
Fantastic guest. My center of the universe “understanding” described @ 32:45 is a marching band. The marchers in the center of the ring march much slower than the ones at the outside of the ring, so naturally because we have to define our view as the center, the universe expansion should appear faster at it’s furthest points from our observations. Am I close?
Charles is so awesome!
This was great! Probably one of my favorite Cosmic Queries!
Sorry to burst your bubble - but that was all a lie - the whole concept and theory of evolution - is a lie, based on a mystical fairytale religion - called evolution
great content and Charles Liu is a comedian. thank you
Great as usual, I would love to hear. Michio Kaku's View on this subject.
Ty Mr . Charles
And, Mr. Gary 🎉🫶🌌💫😎👍🥖🍷🎄🎁
I love Charles Liu way of thinking.
This is the Dream Team of the channel. They always deliver the best content.
I love when smart people argue. Great episode
More Charles Liu!!! ❤
❤Charles at 34:00 makes more sense. Others may see it however they see fit, but our basic blueprint that has always been, both when Neil talks how about things -life creation on earth and the ways galaxies give birth to new stars. This is the way our ancestors describe things -As Above, So Below.
Our observable universe, and everything within it looks like the design of a living cell and we can see that resemblance. So the mirroring effect that Dr. Levin was trying to compare sounds more like the dividing of cells, and each cell replicating an exact copy of itself for its specific function, but each cell copy being a different universe, each universe a different dimension. That just feels more logical than the balloon theory being a single point that simply expands.
Everything that we know in our reality splits and divides countless times. The Zinc Spark wouldn't this be like the big bang, but on a smaller scale? And after this, division of individual (cells) galaxies begins.
This pattern is literally in everything. Even in our way of creating societies. So if we are made of star stuff, then this is in our blueprint. You can't say it would be different for the universe, when we are the universe.
If my egg just expanded after its big spark, but never divides it would probably just rupture and die. Because it couldn't divide.
Great episode!
paranormal activity could just as easily be overlap in the multiverse or interdimensional interaction between alternate realities :).
30 minutes in, and uhh... Not sure why it's a "sports edition." Which is way fine with me, but yeah. 🤷♀️
Edit: Great video. Learned a few things. I love StarTalk, have been watching for years, and still look forward to each episode.
Omg this was my favorite episode so far❤
I love you guys! Thanks, Charles!
Excellent one guys.
First time hearing this kind of talk. Love it and almost understand it. ❤
i loved the heated debate about love
I wish they had settled the debate on love, that was fun to watch
Another great show. The best one until the next one and so on through infinity.
19:49 - what if there are people who see glitches but we call them crazy and dismiss them?
Chuck made a very valid point before everyone started talking over him.
I love this episode when everyone is right but at opposite sides!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉
Love cosmic queries
How do you know what's the glitch is, if everything you know is simulated? In other words, how can you tell what's not real when you never knew what reality looks like?
Interesting talk about love, but I think love is a decision. You can love anyone, no matter how undeserving, if you decide to. Hate works the same way. These emotions aren't caused by others, they are our own reactions to other people. Causation starts, in my view, in the brain and not with externalities.
one of the best shows ever
@startalk - If universe is expanding uniformly at all directions at whatever speed then how come galaxies are colliding with each other sometimes?
For a moment there, I thought Charles Liu was going to say, "Now that the Hubble has been humbled, we use the James Webb." So let's all refer to it as the Humble Space Telescope.
beautiful episode
This is so cool! Some of it reminds me of Star Trek, the Original Series, where the computer is asked to solve a problem!
Not sure what this has to do with sports but nevertheless this was an awesome episode. I loved when Neil explains the Black Mirror episode 😂
Truly a great episode and could watch another 30 minutes, BUT did they talk about sports at all?
AI should categorize all repeated spectrum gradient of frequencies, if it repeats but in multiple distances then we got a new set of what is possible in the universe. Could some of the data show echoes of, say, a black hole, with signatures so scattered it covers a huge portion of the sky
Neil, I have to admit that I’m slow on the uptake. I need teachers and others to hand hold me through the learning process. I struggle with remote learning, and math has been too difficult. I need a teacher in the room to hand hold me to the finish line. Life has been too difficult and exacted a high price from me. I don’t even feel like talking to anyone after the Covid crisis. I need teachers and aides who can support me directly through the learning process.
Charles Liu is awesome
I wish these episodes were 3 hours long lol
18:50 Using Charles and Neil’s logic for checking if you are not in a simulation- then our Dreams/Nightmares may qualify as glitches in the simulation (defy physics, inconsistent reality) -or- maybe 🤔 our Dreams/Nightmares are actually simulations created by our brains 🧠
I 'love' this episode
And could it be considered logical love? like even without empathy you could probably still decide to treat someone a certain way right? Same thing like when your mad at someone and you tell them you love them anyways😂😂
This was not "Startalk Sports Edition". It was "StarTalk Love Edition".
I'm watching again. November 2024.
Charles liu ❤️❤️❤️❤️
At the start ., you guys are tha awesome 👏
This was spirited lol I love it!
The description of a sociopath mimicking the performance of love is eerily similar to autistic masking. Emotional abuse victims have funky brain chemistry/performative emotions too. Love is a psychiatric piazza.
Yeah, Dr. Liu . . . 🎉🎉🎉
Good to c these people back
I love you guys... The love Convo tho ❤
Nice impression Chuck!
💫🌠13:42 Charles: "The stars are so far apart, that they almost never hit each other directly..." Galaxies Comingle. Alas!
Hahahahahaha love it when Lord Nice does the voices for the names 😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
Thank you
If this is used in this way Its amazing 🙏
Dr. Frankenstein.... 🤣 don't mess with The Chuck
I watched a video about 2 weeks ago that presented a good theory about the Black Hole exiting at high speed & creating stars in it wake was:
3 galaxies colliding & the 3-body gravity interaction to throw 1 black hole out at high speed.
💙26:28 Charles: "Depends on what you think love is..." What if we are in a love laboratory? Exploring love in all possible conditions, directions, dimensions...e.g. hydrogen in loving relationship with oxygen, (what a couple!), chlorine in love with sodium giving a salt of the earth. From the love that holds the nucleus together (and evil scientists relentlessly attempting to smash that bond 😀) to the comingling of galaxies and multiverses? What if limitless love (consciousness, Light and Sound according to ancient wisdom) is the basic fabric of all that exists, exploring Itself from various levels of limitations, e.g. the human package of perceptions? Experiment to test this using an ancient sonic tuning fork *HU* to raise personal vibrations. Search how to sing *HU* .
what is the a amount gravitational curvature/pressure to form a star or planet?
neural networks are the basis of deep learning. As Charles said, they're still far simpler than the brain, but we can manipulate them even more easily :)
In a way you're right - manipulating the brain is far easier than know of -
just like Neil Tyson does every day - he spews out lies and disinformation about the universe and science altogether - there is no truth no facts of what the states, in trying to explain the universe - that is because the use and go by their religion they call evolution
so yes - they to manipulate the brain very easily - the indoctrination starts at grade school - and up to the universities.
So the fine tuning of the universe.. could that be counted as a glitch too?
How can neural networks help in discovery of cosmos?
Chuck reminds me of the wayan brothers
The lightning makes niel look like a super villain 😂
Apologies if this is a draft question, if everything flew out in all directions from the big bang singularity, how do we now get galaxies on collision courses from different directions?
Don't know the answer, but there are no daft questions, at least that's what my good teachers said.
@@roberth721 thank you kind sir.
I just realised something - We are assuming our reality is something special or realistic or as good as it gets - so anything below that would be glitches - what we call a good enough simulation may be small sauce for a real reality if this was a simulation - it might just be good enough for us.
Albert Einstein made contributions to physics. His brother Frank made well he made a monster
Asking AI, If there is one, does the antimatter universe have inverse colors to the matter universe if observed?
No, colors are the same.
34:04 if t=0 could you have a dimension where t=infinity therefore leading to the cyclical universe