@@jamesk2478yes, but since the board has 2-aces and 2-4s on it, if Mike had an ace in his hand, he’d have a higher full-house. That’s why the dude checked it down at the end instead of betting.
I'm confused why they are surprised it went check check, neither have an ace, Mizrachi checks hoping the other guy has an ace, he could have value bet 6s full but given the run out a check back is likely
@@FunclipMonkeyuse your imagination. Check check makes perfect sense and is completely standard. The 4s will shove jam when Ax bets but Hachem has the on other possible hand that goes check on that awful river.
El check de Mizrachi no tiene sentido en el river, teniendo poker debió apostar algo. Sea que el rival le pague o no. Esperar la apuesta de Hachem fue un error, especialmente cuando todas las acciones fueron check. El check de Hachem si pudo ser justificado, aunque no sabemos como fueron las acciones preflop.
No se cuanto es necesario pa Hachem por que 666AA ya no gana contra AAA44 pero si estoy de acuerdo que tuvo que hacer algo Mizrachi. Buscaba el check raise pero no 😅
@@gamerpspc8421 El check de Hachem estuvo bien. Pero dependiendo de las acciones preflop, un raise también sería factible. Las únicas manos que le ganan son 44 o AX. Dependiendo de las acciones preflop se podría evaluar que tan probable es que el rival tenga una de esas manos. Pero Hachem al final se inclino por la acción más segura que era el check, lo cual estuvo bien también. Lo de Mizrachi si fue error, eso es indiscutible.
It's ridiculous how many people don't realize how insane that check-back is. 66 is NOT losing to aces full, because AA is the pair with 444, which loses to Hachem's three 6's with 44. Hachem is beating any Ace besides A6 or A4
![“อาร์ต พศุตม์” เกือบเอี่ยวทุกคดีดัง เอ๊ะไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรได้มาง่ายๆ | แฉ 16 ต.ค. 67 [2/3] | GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Gx-0-kUBv8/mqdefault.jpg)
He’s losing to any ace…
Yep… he was prepared to fold
@@jamesk2478yes, but since the board has 2-aces and 2-4s on it, if Mike had an ace in his hand, he’d have a higher full-house. That’s why the dude checked it down at the end instead of betting.
@@jamesk2478full house over full house goes to the better 3 of a kind
You are wrong
@@clintdrolet5381Whose wrong?
Easy check back in tournament play. What are u targeting
I'm confused why they are surprised it went check check, neither have an ace, Mizrachi checks hoping the other guy has an ace, he could have value bet 6s full but given the run out a check back is likely
That guy low key influenced me to get 44s that as well
How did that go check check that’s crazy that’s crazier than the run out
Any ace beats his pocket sixes, pretty solid check back I think
Why are people so shocked about the check check? The announcers sound like amateurs
@@jacobhouts8713 the check back was great. but how does mizrachi not bet here? why wouldnt you want to get value from your quads?
@@FunclipMonkey He probably put Hachem on Ax and hoped his check would induce a bet from him
@@FunclipMonkeyuse your imagination. Check check makes perfect sense and is completely standard. The 4s will shove jam when Ax bets but Hachem has the on other possible hand that goes check on that awful river.
Ace turn
is the action killer
El check de Mizrachi no tiene sentido en el river, teniendo poker debió apostar algo. Sea que el rival le pague o no. Esperar la apuesta de Hachem fue un error, especialmente cuando todas las acciones fueron check.
El check de Hachem si pudo ser justificado, aunque no sabemos como fueron las acciones preflop.
No se cuanto es necesario pa Hachem por que 666AA ya no gana contra AAA44 pero si estoy de acuerdo que tuvo que hacer algo Mizrachi. Buscaba el check raise pero no 😅
@@gamerpspc8421 El check de Hachem estuvo bien. Pero dependiendo de las acciones preflop, un raise también sería factible. Las únicas manos que le ganan son 44 o AX. Dependiendo de las acciones preflop se podría evaluar que tan probable es que el rival tenga una de esas manos.
Pero Hachem al final se inclino por la acción más segura que era el check, lo cual estuvo bien también.
Lo de Mizrachi si fue error, eso es indiscutible.
Of course he checks behind 66 full. Are you really getting value from king high as played?
Hoping to check raise aces full.
Even if mizarachi bet his quads, all the chips not going in. Pocket 6’s are counterfeit once the 4 hit on the river.
Half of the comments are bots lol
AI taking over 😢😢
Actually saves him lots of chips
Only the Grinder can find the one outer.
A 5 second sponsor read in a < 60 second clip? The future is looking bleak boys.
At pokerstars this happens Avery day several times...
Bro got quads and decide to check, Am I missing something?
trapping bruh
It's ridiculous how many people don't realize how insane that check-back is. 66 is NOT losing to aces full, because AA is the pair with 444, which loses to Hachem's three 6's with 44. Hachem is beating any Ace besides A6 or A4
Any ace beats hachem because it would be AAA44. ie if I had AK in my hand I would have AAA44. So any ace and pocket 4s beat him.
Are you serious? One ace on player hands make AAA44 which beats 666AA, making a silly mistake here
Really mikeee🤓
Friendship friends
Ouch…
Aaron Rodgers plays poker now??
Mizrachi runs lucky
17million in total earnings lucky? 🙄
and the pot was soooooooooooo small
both rekt.
watched this hand live, insane runout even before the river
Easy fold there.. if you have an Ace it hard to fold there!
Nobody folded it went check check
do u know how to play the game?