May's Brexit Update Explained - Explaining Brexit
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- Yesterday (26th February 2018) Theresa May made a statement in Parliament. During this address she updated the house on the proceedings of Brexit. This included the votes she has planned and the amendments she’s made to her Brexit deal
Corbyn’s Response: • Corbyn's Reaction to M...
Independent Group Explained: • The New Independent Gr...
Support TLDR on Patreon: www.patreon.com/tldrnews
Follow TLDR on Instagram: tldrnewsuk
Like TLDR on Facebook: tldrnewsuk
Follow TLDR on Twitter: tldrnewsuk
TLDR is all about getting you up to date with the news of today, without bias and without filter. We want to give you the information you need, so you can make your own decision.
TLDR is a super small company, run by one person with the help of some amazing voulenteers. We are 100% fan sourced with all of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corportations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, following and backing on Patreon. Thanks!
![[FULL EP.16] เซียนพาลุย "เผือก-ฟรอยด์" กรี๊ดลั่น จนปูหนี | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FsqUvwS3b-Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Brexit is like deciding with your family where to go on holiday. Your uncle picks somewhere awful then you spend two years having to hear them talk about the awful holiday. Eventually you find out your uncle lied about how great the holiday is and he just wants to get there to sleep with a waitress he met called Taxe Vasion. Now your a few weeks away and he hasn't even booked a hotel just the flights and while he hops off to his girlfriends house the rest of you are going to be left at the runway in the middle of nowhere.
Aj Battle this is hands down the best thing in TH-cam,its sad just how accurate this is.
@@LRichelieu It's not accurate
Aj Battle 😭😂😂
I appreciate editing out all the unnecessary yelling and laughing and growling in the house...^^its annoying and so frustrating to watch; Politicians somehow seem to get away with worse manners than most little children
*Yeaahhh*
Here here here here...........
Yes, take all what is human out of the equation lets replace them with robots, they won't need to talk the'll just do without us knowing. I love my parliament everybody gets heard even if it's antagonizing, it's the definition of democracy.
Oooooooorrrrdeerrrrrrrrr!!
Yea gets annoying but emotions are high. I can understand why there's so much noise in there.
@@goldenlink10 If democracy is about acting like an entitled child, I want no part in it. I prefer my country's republic, where delegates are provided slots to have their voice heard by a representative.
Screaming like a child is not "having your voice heard". It's screaming like a child. Unproductive. No wonder your House can't agree on anything.
I apologize for what I will say, I do not mean to offend anyone, but watching the British Parliament, I have the impression of looking at an animal farm :P. Those screams, strange noises ...
I prefere a bunch of animals shouting their opinion then a bunch of sheeps saying yes with order.
Intriguing, me too. Which does not change the fact that the British Parliament probably stopped in time and still looks like 500 years ago.@@livefreeordie42
I can assure you that most parliaments work like this, from the ancient roman senate to todays republics. Its a natural result of humans trying to express their opinion, it doesnt matter how educated they are.
Absolutely overpaid greedy pigs grunting in unison
@@livefreeordie42 A mess of people shouting indistinguishably surely will make their opinions be heard. Why does the Parliament even vote, if you can just scream your opinion like a child throwing a tamper tantrum?
You should do videos like this more often, breaking down the House of Commons meetings. I really appreciate the work!!
What is the likelihood the European Union will accept any changes to the withdrawal agreement? Even if the U.K. passes a deal in Parliament, the E.U. can simply vote no.
Not likely at all. EU officials have already said multiple time that the agreement has been done and it wont be changed. That is why May could only give promises on the nature of the negotiations in the future which the deal states need to be done.
EU members will accept an extension if they feel that it will be productive, not if they feel like the UK is kicking the can down the road. But the time is short as you know, us other memberstates have EU elections coming up and each state will be focusing more on that than Brexit.
Not every change would be accepted, maybe something little
I think the EU has already settled on the idea with Tuss.. EU will only give an extension on the grounds that there will be second referendum.. any other deals that is proposed to EU would be pointless.. as Tuss is only a representative.. the proposal will have to go through all the countries.. which will take months to vote on.. literally Tuss can only agree what has been voted on by the other counties.. so what May said here is pointless.. as extension would never be made in time.. unless it involve a second referendum. I still don't understand why UK still think EU are run by one person.. and negotiated by one parties... that part really perplex me. EU is one complex system, it could not bent towards UK even it Tuss are head over heel trying to help UK .. you simply need to go through the system to be granted the "authorities" for change.. and it would take months.
I can see Spain telling U.K. to give up Gibraltar if they want a yes vote from them on an extension...
Since when listening to the people means ignoring 48% of your citizens?
52% are being ignored. Get it right
@@Mivs123 weren't the 52% voting for brexit? They will get it in one way or another. The referendum wasn't about what kind of brexit do you want want but whether or not do you want brexit
You get the brexit you were 'listened'. This is how democracy works
that's how democracy works... majority wins. if you decided to not ignore the 48%, then you'd end up ignoring 52% instead. the referendum was a binary choice; remain or leave. it's impossible to *not* ignore the 48% if you're going to follow through with what the majority voted for.
i guess lord buckethead was right... this is a shitshow...
Buckethead for prime minister
you wrote 2018 in the discription not 2019
Well, it sure feels like it's more than a year that we hear May saying the same shit over and over. :D
Well done, you get a medal lol
We're living in the past and it looks like we may do so till 2021.
@@hamza9234 No pun intended
@@tufftraveller4784 The guy also works full time and is traning for a marathon alongside running this channel ... he does deserve a medal.
love the non-biased nature of this channel. So hard to find that now, even on the BBC, as everyone has an opinion on Brexit. But you just give the facts, which is great
You're delusional if you don't think this channel has a bias, they have stated more than once that they are pro-remain and it shows in several of their videos. That said its certainly a lot more subtle than the outrageously evident bias from the BBC.
jds54 of course nothing is truly non bias but like you said it’s much better than BBC and most other outlets at the moment
@@jackwarren5608 They try not to let their biases hinder their objectivity. Which is more than what can be said for, well, almost everyone else.
Also the countries wearing shoes are cute.
I really like this channel called "A different bias". This guy explains things really well.
It's reassuring to have an independent assessment of the current activities of our Government. Your explanations are clear and concise and very much appreciated.
So there is no plan for if the extension fails the vote?
People's vote is the plan and change brexit
@@groslait7814 but you can't have a people's vote without an extension, you need at least 10 weeks. So if they don't vote for the extension, then what do they do?
@@z0mbiebanana9891 there will be an extension , May's deal and no deal are now 100% off the table.
@@groslait7814 then why vote for an extension? May's deal agreed off the table. no deal will be rejected at first but an extension still has a vote, still could be rejected. If it is, then what? Deny the vote of the house and go with the extension anyway? Or go with no deal? Just seems strange.
It isn't like May hasn't already made it up as she goes on.
Love these videos, travelling to Europe in May and September and have no idea whats going on so thank heavens for this channel!
what keeps annoying me is the following:
the referendum was based on completely different views on what Brexit would actually be.
Lets examine:
-Norway+ deal is close to staying in the EU and was promised by the likes of Corbyn
-No major economic downsides (promised by Liam Fox).
-Hard Brexit being favourable (People like Jacob Reess Mogg and Nigel Farage)
These completely different views on brexit are not compatible.
For instance 2 million people voted to leave the EU on the understanding that they would get the Norway+ deal. Instead they might end up with a Hard brexit. Is this something that they were promised, and voted for? NO!
basically what it comes down to is the following: A group of 52% of the voters voted leave. Most of them for completely different reasons and ideas of what brexit would actually look like. On the 1 hand you have people that want out of the EU at any cost. (Hard brexiteers). You have people that want to leave the EU but follow most of the rules anyway in order to keep damage to the country low.
All these different votes accumulated to 52%
If the plan was made first and the referendum was held with the following question:
Would you like to leave the EU on No deal/TM's deal? (note the / being an or in the question so only 1 option would be on the ballot).
[]Stay within the EU
[] Leave the EU on No deal/TM's deal
i can 100% guarantee you that the vote wouldn't be over 50%. Hell i think it would struggle to reach 30% in case of the question involving No-deal. Especially now that all the lies have mostly been exposed.
If you are a leaver i'm going to ask you the following: Can you indicate why you voted to leave. What your red lines are and how much you'd actually sacrifice to leave the EU.
I came across a few pepole that voted leave on twitter and asked them this same question. 1 of them said: I'd be delighted if we leave on no deal. Then i asked: What has the EU done that you want to leave it without a deal. Please give some proper arguments. No response.
If you want to leave the EU so bad, you MUST have a good reason to do so. If your house suddenly drops 30% in value, you must have a reason to justify this, right?
What Politicians promises and what they can deliver are two different thinks, people should be less dumb and research on their own.
Brexit means Brexit. I voted Leave to get rid of the foreigners. Britain for the British!
blaster1 112 well laid out! The problem is that the people who are so adamant about leaving the EU don’t really have a reasoned argument as to why. The truth is they are emotionally invested in the idea of a ‘freedom’ narrative - and like a gambler, deluding themselves by doubling down at the very hint they either were hoodwink or that they got it wrong.
@@tadeuferreira5705 still my point stands. Between a soft and a hard Brexit is a Huge difference, one that a single vote can not accurately represent.
I voted for Brexit because I think large centralised governments are a bad idea.
After Brexit I want less power to be in Westminster and more given to local councils.
The people who are the best equipped to manage an area are the ones that live there.
I am an engineer, the company I work for is hindered by regulations that favour Germany on a daily basis.
I’m not bothered about immigration, I want higher skilled people to move to the U.K. from around the globe, not just the EU.
Being out of the customs union and not under the jurisdiction of the ECJ are my red lines.
Most people don’t answer because remainers tend not to want to hear, only belittle and denigrate. I think they can be forgiven for using past experience as a template. As you can see from some of the replies you’ve got they’re not wrong.
I’m just a lot more stubborn.
Honestly, just piss off already. Remember when thinking about the UK would inspire thoughts of revolutionary science from Dr. Hawking, progressive critical thinking with Prof. Dawkins at its lead, and all the wonderfully strong standing reasoning of British culture?
Yeah, long time ago ah? Now we have this. Ugh.
I feel ya
Britain gave the world Monty Python comedy and Monty Python politics. They're its 2 contributions to world culture.
Miguel Melchior Yeah, you don’t sound like a self important elitist one bit.
I’ve said this many times, I got an M.phil in industrial engineering from Cambridge and I’m studying for a PhD, I learned a lot about engineering and maths but not much about politics.
It doesn’t make me more qualified to have a political opinion, it just makes me a good engineer.
Attitudes like yours are why some people rebelled, thank you. You helped us win.
"progressive critical thinking with Prof. Dawkins at its lead"
Aha ha ha ha! Oh jeez. Thanks for a good laugh, mate!
@@mrmagoo-i2l
A shitter economy is not what I would call winning. Maybe in Charlie Sheen's world whereby making an absolute balls of everything would be considered a victory, yeah. But for the normals amongst us, less jobs and higher trade costs aren't winning. populist fear mongering and baiting is what won Brexit victory, that and UK governments blaming their shit governance on the EU
Damn, you truly are the best! Thanks for all your hard work, it must be tiring to upload every day
don't get me wrong, I really wish that uk would remain in eu etc...
but you are giving for granted that eu will say yes to an extension.
If I understood correctly every member state should agree about that
(spain, catalunia *cof cof*), I won't consider it 100% chance, not even 70/30
But we're *British*! The world does what we tell it to!
(At least, that's what many British like to think...)
I think whole Europe wishes the best for UK and it wouldn't be a problem to say yes to extension.
@@marcysss93 I hope you are right, just one vote against and everything go south :/
The extension will not be a big problem.
If a region in the EU is doing a lot of trade with the UK an extension is preferred.
If a region doesn't do a lot of trade, nothing changes en why would they block what the others want?
As a small region you would need a good reason to block the will of the rest of the EU and since it's an extension of the current situation I don't see what reason that could be.
The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and many more nations have great interest in postphoning Brexit for a bit longer, I think they can sway Spain. Spain might find itself in a better position to retake Gibraltar, so that may even be in their interest.
Great video! Thank you so much!
Some of the titles don't show properly. Also 2019, not 2018. Otherwise outstanding content as usual. Thank you for the awesome work you're doing here.
Why is the UK, after learning so much more about the true consequences of Brexit, allowing 17 million people to have such priority power over 74 million people? Common sense has left the UK. The vote now should be "Do you want to leave knowing what you will face in the future on the Deal's terms or on a No Deal or do you want to stay as a member of the EU?
You were very right my friend like so many of us....
1st) What's the purpose on voting for an extension to article 50 if they are not going to agree with the EU deal? 2nd) Why the EU should agree to extend article 50 (It is the EU who decides either to extend it or not, not Westminster).
The purpose would only be if the deal was accepted. The time needed to pass the necessary legislation. If nothing is agreed by 29th then an extension, agreed, is pointless.
My hunch is the house will accept May's deal. But I wouldn't bet much on anything related to Brexit.
Martin Hodge
Indeed. JC sat on the fence for too long. Now it’s hard to detect what he really believes is right.
He’s only recently gone through the “awakening” that lots of leavers at heart will need to over the next few years.
The “that need us more than we need them” mentality doesn’t take notice that the need is mutual. Modern economies are interdependent unless they want to be like Burma or Zimbabwe.
JC has been late in internalizing that.
The 'Malthouse compromise' seems to be gaining momentum, but there is very little information on what it is exactly and how it could work (or not). One of your great videos that addresses this topic would be most useful. Thanks
Everyone is complaining about the spelling mistakes... for God's sake... can you just appreciate that someone must have worked all night to make this video so quickly? The content is great, everything is well explained... who cares about spelling mistakes... this is not a video about English grammar or language...🤦♀️
So, let me get this straight... Under no circumstance are the citizens of GB to be allowed to reconsider their original vote and have a second vote, but on the other hand Parliament gets to vote again and again on May's deal until she gets the result she wants? Am I the only one who sees the irony in this?
Thank you for your constant explanations!! They're so clear and straight forward!
Almost three years since the Brexit vote and the politicians are still dragging their feet......the UK is not leaving the EU.
I love how clear and organised your videos are.
nice one this is much better than what is happening in parliment at the moment
People voted to shoot themselves in the foot so this house has to deliver.
But we are 100% commited that it won't be the left foot and it won't be the right. If neccessary we will delay the shooting... **facepalm**
@Spinler Muckflitt Isn't there something called European Parliament elections? And member states (their governments) have something to say too. Based on number of citizens (I think). Not exactly "unelected" or undemocratic.
I complain about politicians in the capitol too, but it doesn't mean I'd want my city to leave my country.
@@Mic_Glow North Korea also holds Presidential elections too.
@@Mic_Glow Electing is not the pinacle of democraty. The EU parlement is also the weakest of the instutition. It has very few power if not no power at all.
And you could be glad the UK still has its own currency, things would have been way worst then.
@Salterino Kripperino what, i hope youre kidding
I like this format for your videos
Good social media marketing strategy, bait brits who can't restrain themselves from yelling about Brexit online
Thanks for not letting your opinions bias your videos; you are much easier to trust than the rest of the internet!
If they vote no to her deal, then no to no deal, then no to an extension, where does that leave us?
A lot of has developed in the time since the referendum but they're insisting on data that is nearly three years old now. The data will have undoubtedly have changed there could be fewer, or even more, than 17 million people who would vote to leave, and i want to stress this part, knowing now what brexit actually entails beyond the campaigns
I’m now totally confused. What is the proposed solution to the backstop and has the EU agreed to those changes behind closed doors. Wasn’t the backstop the only reason her proposed exit agreement failed on?
your turnaround time is ridiculously quick for videos on recent updates i'm impressed
"What kind of message would that send to the more than 17M people that voted to leave the EU nearly three years ago now?"
Well...
One - your government is utterly incompetent and probably should never have started this mess without a scrap of a plan.
Two - this is way more complicated and difficult than those 17M people thought it would be.
Three - those 17M people were systematically lied to by both the leave campaigners AND successive UK governments.
"I have been clear throughout the process that my aim has been to bring the country back together..."
by utterly ignoring the people who voted remain, the people who didn't vote, the people who weren't allowed to vote and of course, the people who are living here legally under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty - which we signed - who I like to call 'queue-jumpers'. Because nothing says 'we want to get you all together again' like forgetting more than half actually exist.
"... this house can only do this by implementing the decision of the British People."
Well, 37% of the voters, more like 26% of the entire British People.. in a non-binding referendum, where the winning side was found guilty of multiple violations of the elections acts in an election where as many as 4.5M "British people" were arbitrarily excluded from the vote and Commonwealth citizens, who aren't 'British People' were allowed to vote... but sure.
Sidenote: Anyone else notice that May missed an entire outcome? If the house doesn't vote to leave with no deal.. then there will be a vote to extend Article 50. But nothing is said as to what happens if that vote fails - or if it passes and the EU says no (which is likely since France and Germans have both said they're not going to accept an extension unless there's some point to it).
At that point there will be no options left. May's deal is gone. Leaving with no deal is gone. Extending A50 is gone. 29 March will be just 15 days away - not even time for a referendum.
That means that then there would be exactly two possible outcomes: doing nothing until 29 March and just falling out of the EU with no deal - which, while it would violate the spirit of the vote against doing just that - is in fact the DEFAULT action if nothing is done. To actually live up to the vote, the gov would have to do something to avoid it.
Which leaves us with just one remaining (pardon the pun) option... revoking Article 50.
The messages one, two and three are already well understood all over the world, just not everywhere in UK
Minor changes, its like a school kid rushing in their homework last minute on an extension period lol
I feel Brexit is a big mistake. Thank you for your great video.
It's only been a mistake because of the remainer Government. The PM herself voted to remain, yet felt she should lead the leave campaign and didn't think there was anything wrong with that. There's enough at this point to say that the PM and the EU are working together so the UK does not leave.
I live in N.Ireland and I've always felt British, but I've never been so against the UK Government in all my days. I'll only ever vote again if it's to directly help people, which means I'll never vote again.
Amazing video as always!
Something is not clear. What if, after rejecting May's Deal, the Parliament rejects the option of a No Deal Brexit and then there is not a mojority for an extension of the Article 50. Does it mean No Deal is going to happen anyway? Why does Theresa May say that the Parliament need to vote for No Deal to make it happen, if in reality it may happen anyway?
Non-Brit here. I have so many questions about the British House of Commons! Is it always this unruly? Why is everyone sitting on fancy subway benches in a tiny room? What's the difference between "honourable" and "right honourable"? I could go on, but those are the most pressing.
Non-brit here too
Yes, it looks like it is always this unruly.
I guess because it is a historic building? And they want to keep it like this? Its not that they have such a great history anyway.
Im not so sure there is a difference, but I could be wrong. I think he just tries to be polite, no?
I greatly appreciate this channel, thank you
2:01 "From Colleu" instead of "From Colleagues across the House"
rentregagnant also confusion between “affects” and “effects”
Also "CONCENT"
Collegu actually.
Well spotte
Hey you missed one step in the whole process. What happens if the house votes against the deal on the 12th, against leaving with no deal on the 13th and then against extending article 50 on the 14th. All of these are likely. Where does that leave everyone then?
May: No one wants a No-deal, so we will stay in but call it out and everyone will be happy.
17.4 millions UK residents: The ballot box may disagree.
No.
Its 17.4 million *UK voters* . I am a UK resident, as I *reside* in the UK but I am *not eligible* to vote. If I were, alongside millions of EU citizens who live, work and support the country , then I seriously doubt Brexit would be even considered.
Thanks for the upload! 👍
Jack boots to the left, Jack boots to the right, while they try to kick us quietly into the night.
All I want to know is how does it affect people who are British citizens living abroad
I'm confused, hopefully someone helps me with this.
Brexit vote, 33.5M total votes with Leave winning by 1.4M votes. Here's where I get confused. There are 46.5M registered voters in the UK. If 13M voters didn't cast a ballot, shouldn't there be something done about that? The winning margin is 1/10th the non-vote total. Could the fact that the vote was so close with not everyone voting that it would automatically trigger another referendum?
Just getting further and further away from what the people’s vote was for. All that she had to say for 3 hours was , if you don’t want no deal , then vote for the deal ( the one that’s not a deal but terms for remaining incognito)
It told us that she's getting ready to absolutely shaft the UK on Brexit.
Compare the British Parliament meetings with all the shouting, farts, burps and bad manners in general to the sleek, calm and bright looking meetings of the EU.
Why does the govt keep bringing up the votes of 17million people. Is that the new population of the UK? I am confused!
The very concerns they are discussing here underscore the threat that the EU has always imposed. I applaud Britain for taking back its sovereignty.
The only way brexiteers would be happy is if theresa May screamed “out means out!” In everyone’s face instead of answering questions..
If Only the politicians could explain it this clearly !! Lol
British people be like "-Brexit?? We're gonna need bigger colonies".
Why leave?
The fashion in which politicians talk about each other is childish, so sad there is no obvious better way.
So the people may vote on leaving the European Union but not HOW they will leave, democracy at work.
That's because the vote was to leave. Not how to leave, not to stay connected with the EU, simply to leave.
And that's exactly what David Cameron promised the nation before the referendum.
@Fhjthnl Lol Iuyo exactly
It's been going on since the windrush. It was all bullshit. I'm of South Indian heritage. My grandad was RECRUITED by the British to serve in the British Navy in Singapore. He came over to the UK and worked for a few years in a factory and then went back to India. My parents got married and chose to come over to the UK as my Grandad had a British passport from his service. Now, they were lied to. There were promises of prosperity and work, based on the British needing people to come and do so. It was rubbish. My dad could have stayed in India they were conviced to leave everything and come to the UK. You may think that well he could have gone back but life was very different then. You can't just get up, move to a new country, and then move back to go back into your previous work as though nothing happened. and you also need a money for it, which my parents didn't have after coming to the UK. But my dad found a job straight away and never signed on or took a penny from the government, Not having money after ending up in Europe is one of the biggest occurences with the current "windrush" with the EU.
I'm in my 30's and my father is just telling me of the windrush deceit now but maybe it's because I goaded it out of him with all EU talk. Now the same thing is happening with the North African migrants. They are also being lied to with promises of work and prosperity when there isn't any. Macron and Merkel were openly inviting them to come into the EU and the NGO's are assisting with this process.
Check out Laura Southern's documentary on this.
/watch?v=UlM-bkGg08I
It's all standard divide and rule tactics which has been going on for 100's of years. Nothing new, but now we're all becoming aware of it and are fighting back.
@Spinler Muckflitt
@Spinler Muckflitt people were tough as nails back then. Everybody just got on with things. We all beat the shit out of eachother but we drink together in the pubs and our kids go to school together. That's actual multiculturalism is action. Not this fascist project forced upon us by the EU.
But you're welcome. I shared it because it needs to be said. Being called a racist is one the biggest hurdles the anti-EU folk face and people like me need to speak out more to combat this. A lot of minorities voted to leave and that's being intentionally ignored.
You're right, I shouldn't even use the word "multiculturalism" as that would mean I am acknowledging it. I even try to avoid using the word "brexit" as that has been attached to staying tied to the EU. Language is very important hence why bodies such EU suppress it.
I'm glad you acknowledged my point about the minorities standing up because it's true. I truly realised this when I went on the Brexit march last December. During the entire march, I had white British people constantly trying to tell me that they're not racist and I was like, "I know you're not, stop telling me!". Eventually I got to me. I felt sad that ordinary British people who are simply standing up for their people and culture are labelled as "racists", and they have to tell me, a minority in their country that they are not racist. It made me sad, and that's when I realised the most effective thing that I can do to help is to stand up for them, which I do. We can all do different things to help eachother and even writing here on youtube is something, which I believe very very important as it's in real time, fluid, and is the best way to counter act the MSM.
But during the March, the main thing I felt was joy. I realised there and then, that we are winning. There's no reason for you to be depressed, this is beautiful. We voted agains the entire political system, the media and our establishment and we won. The same in America and what's happening as we speak all around Europe. We have kicked off a revolution. The MSM media is dying, they are literally making redundancies and actively trying to silence people like Tommy Robinson and anybody with a growing youtube channel. Historically, the act of trying to silence people, means the people in power are losing and have nothing left. People cannot be silenced , we will win.
So don't feel sad, this moment is beautiful, we are all untied, more than we ever have been and we are fighting together for a better future.
@Some Girl
I was ligitamately thinking she was going to say that if they agreed that they can't leave the eu with a deal that Brexit would essentiallg be called off...
But nope. Throw in an extension, with which she will not even consider the idea of another referendum....
What happens if May's deal fails, the no deal vote fails and the extension of article 50 vote also fails?
No deal cannot "fail". A no deal Brexit will happen by default if the governments withdrawal agreement is not accepted and article 50 is not extended.
Bring the country back together. Remember that.
We have become a laughing stock. It is embarrassing, amateur and shamefully undemocratic.
What does it mean to commend the statement to the house?
this is a much better cut editing style video, thank you
no confidence. pure negligence.
Respect the will of the people. Sign the UK open petition for a no deal Brexit 359,169 MBGA
UK population is 66-something millions. In 2016, 46-Something millions (72%)voted of which 17-something millions for LEAVE which is roughly 25% of the UK population if I’m not mistaken. Having listened to the news the government’s mantra is to respect the 51,9% leave vote result. What about the other75% and their respect? Have they been listened at No10,in Parliament ? Are they being heard at all? Just theoretical questions from an outsider.
Apparently the 17 million represent "the will of the people". Screw the other 50 million who didn't vote for Brexit.
Hardly "explained". It seems to me that you have just shown highlights whilst adding cards that repeat what is being said, sometimes incomplete. You could have listed all the popup card text and given comment or an explanation.
The flow chart similarly repeats exactly what is being said. Are there people watching this that do not understand what is being said and need a graphic flowchart? If it were a complex processes, then flowcharts indeed help, but surely not here!
Explaining a subject would benefit from asides and some background info. The UK parliament channel used to have commentators explaining what was going on during the division vote counts. I found this enormously helpful as they explained so much, but it seems that they no longer do this. I watched your video looking for much the same, but just found a "highlights" show with distracting incompl cards.
Furthermore, you stopped prematurely. What about if EU do not allow for an extension? That was discussed but was not included.
Some amendments were not moved based on the PM's assurances at the dispatch box. Did you not think that they were important? Also Yvette Coopers amendment was moved despite the PM saying that it would be done. Apparently Yvette Cooper did not trust the PM's word and needed it voted upon. There is so much going on far deeper than what is being said at the dispatch box, it would be so helpful to hear a decent explanation in case I have missed other issues. For instance 20 Tory MP's voted against Yvette Cooper's amendment. That is really surprising. Do you have any thoughts on the point were they trying to make?
This video format is great! You should maybe try applying it to EU debates as well (even after brexit). Great job!
NO EXTENSION OUT WITH NO DEAL NOW
Why?
It's like asking the family if they want to have a picnic, they say yes, then once they get to the picnic spot, there is rubbish everywhere, dog poop and it's raining. Would you STILL have the picnic anyway? Of course not! So it makes sense to ask the people again if they want Brexit knowing this picnic stinks. And there is nothing more immoral than forcing this impossible Brexit KNOWING it will devastate the lives of countless UK citizens for decades to come... and what for? to protect the Tories image. We must march together on the 23rd of March for a people's vote.
A part of me thinks they are doing this on purpose so that the general public will never dare vote in a way they don't like ever again. The problem being a lot of people have said they will nebver vote at all again if it isn't carried out in some way. On both the remain and leave side. That is a lot of people who will refuse to vote for the next general election.
What happens if the Commons reject May's deal, reject no deal AND reject the article 50 extension?
We leave with no deal on 29th March. It's the default. We have to positively embrace an alternative to avoid it
sovereignty in a nutshell: There are only two options fully in UK's hands:
no deal 29th of march or accepting the deal.
all other options need a yes from ALL 27 EU members.
So what's the point of making a vote on "no deal" if it's already the default? If they want to really take "no deal" of the table shouldn't they need to change the actual legislation? How long does changing the legislation take? will there be enough time from March 14 to accomplish this, or can the Government simply decide to extend/ignore?
@@nivnissenson8947 The parliament is not willed to do a decision. Ant they do not want the outcome of no decision - no deal.
Even with no deal there have to be done a lot of changes in laws and regulation. Nothing prepared.
This ends in a mess. The mess already arrived businesses already loading goods on ships not knowing the conditions of unloading at the destination.
The Government is ignoring a lot. Does not help. There are a lot hard facts the training partners can't ignore, the result is never in favor of UK.
No deal
I have a question about the vote and result of the referendum and the action the government has taken based upon it. As far as I am aware there has been demonstrable illegal activity on the side of Leave, and there is legal precedent which would mean that because of that the actual vote and result are invalid, irrespective of whether it would have affect the result or not. And I believe there has been challenged on this basis. However, because the vote was not legally binding and did not require the government to act on it, this is largely irrelevant as a legal basis to challenge the government on proceeding with Brexit, as I understand it, despite the fact that the result could be consider as invalid as a result of the action of some of those on the Leave side. It just seems weird to me.
That necklace is getting heavier and heavier lol
as she approaches Mordor
The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire!
Why is everybody acting like May new “ deal” is not the same deal that everybody we just voted down? the EU is not opening a new negotiation nor have they agreed to change or add to the deal.
Excellent question!
She's stilll playing party politics and avoiding the real problem: seventeen million people made a bloody silly mistake, and a couple of million have realised it -- meaning the whole thing is nonsense.
May finally got rid of that dreadful dog collar chain 😂
This is the ultimate in political hubris and inefficiency. She keeps mentioning the vote....the people should never have voted something so complex that they had no understanding of.
thanks for Mekong These great videos!
NO ONE can explain Brexit.
Proof-reading! "COLLEGU" = colleagues, "WORKERS RIGHTS" (and later, WORKER'S RIGHTS) = workers' rights, "ENVIROMENTAL" = environmental, "TOG" = together
May saying the UK could make a 'success' of a No Deal scenario, is like claiming you could make a success of amputating an arm and a leg. Sure, in a long enough time frame I suppose you could to an extent, but it's never going to be as good as what you had.
How much do I get when I receive my Brexit dividend?
Some spelling mistakes, but overall consistently good content. Keep it up!
The effects will last longer... not "affects"...
she got the same deal two years a go and the dup stop it because of a backstop that was never going to be used
It cannot be permitted to exist. Likelihood is not the point and is anyway a matter of opinion. It CAN happen, and must not be able-to.
@@TheBaconWizard no backstop no Brexit we are staying in EEC for ever
@Martin Hodge Britain has a PM who has mess every thing she has done and you are right Corbyn is a two faced git and will never be PM
@Martin Hodge How is objecting to the backstop then and continuing to object to it now, in any way two-faced?
@Martin Hodge Ok, so he has always supported united Ireland and still does. Explain to me why THAT is two faced.
a plague on all your houses...
Love your work, just wish you would stop plugging your other channels. Very annoying.
Well, someone's plan didn't work
Surely we can just have Her Majesty step in and fix this mess.
She'd do one of two things, peoples vote or revoke it. But revoking it would spark a backlash.
Her Majesty will definitely not step in. This mess has been created by irresponsible politicians, let them handle it.
As a foreigner, i am genuinely curious about what could the queen do to solve this mess?
@@livefreeordie42 she's not really supposed to get involved in politics. It is her government though. She does have the power to intervene but it's seen as incredibly unorthodox to do so nowadays.
That would be the end of the monarchy.
Interesting that there can be a second "meaningful vote" on the same deal after they didn't like the result of the first one, but a second referendum after people got more information on what Brexit means is divisive and wrong. Funny that
It is because they blame the general public for voting in a way they don't like and so wont do that again. As it is fully the fault of the people for ticking a box on a piece of paper to answer a question they chose to ask us. Aside from Ukip no one else even asked to be asked despte the result.
Love how Spain and France literally said they will block article 50.
Mays brexit is not brexit. Its perpetual agony. No way out and worst than staying
i stand with May, not with Labour or the SNP. - from a Scot.
I do appreciate your videos and being able to keep up on brexit, but it's clear that you threw this together rather quickly and didn't review it before you published it. It came off sloppy.
First of all, the EU wouldn't approve Article 50 extension and get the UK to involve in EU election. Nobody wants Farage and co in the EU parliament. You can promise an extension Mrs. May