Submit your clips here: forms.gle/7LKzTdvHwnmZmZ439 Follow me on: Instagram: instagram.com/dashcamless... TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@dashcamlessons Facebook: facebook.com/dashcamlessons
Yet again @7:27 instead of slowing down by just a couple mph and letting mr entitled impatient ass pull ahead as to avoid any unnecessary damage the cammer instead decided to turn into the impact. People are so ridiculously self centered and selfish anymore that there is virtually no humanity left in this world. Nobody is legitimately nice and helpful and considerate anymore. It's all about "gimme gimme gimme mine mine mine and fu*k you to anyone that inconveniences me in even the slightest most insignificant way!" All of that just from 1 small video clip haha lol. Imagine what I could do with 30 minutes
U should provide closed caption to deaf person who can’t hear ur voice on tv !! U are break the law because u don’t provide closed caption ! Or u will get trouble with the law of America disability assistance!!!!
First clip. Your insurance is right, you're at fault. It wasn't a rear end collision. You swerved into the semi when you should've had enough time space to stop.
Agreed. It almost seemed like the only reason he hit the brights is because the other car was speeding. As far as I could tell they weren't being overly aggressive about their speeding either.
@@RoamingRyan It looked to me like they passed him and hurt his feelings. Then he thought putting on his brights and speeding up behind them was the right thing to do. His insurance proved otherwise.
Cammer brighted the speeder initially 'cause he changed lanes with no signal pretty darn close in front of the cammer. Remember, the camera adds 10lbs, no...wait...that's not right. It doesn't show how close things really are. I always get those confused. But, yeah, too close after that. Shoulda slowed down and don't kick the hornet's nest. IMHO, a cammer should always be responsible for these types of accidents even if he didn't swerve into the other lane. Start slowing down way early or change lanes. Expect the unexpected like a festering a-hole out of left field. Buuut, the brake-checker should face far higher consequences in total. Their ins. co. should drop 'em or triple their rates for the reckless brake check. It'd be one thing if the speeder had to stop due to normal driving issues, but to jam on your brakes to try and cause an accident and succeed? It should be reckless driving and be far more expensive for the brake checkers of the world.
That one was a joke. Insurance company is right to charge the cammer as he instigated and antagonized the other driver. A little defensive driving and just letting it go would have saved him.
Love the "brake checks are highly illegal", so is blinding the approaching cars and the one that brake checked you, after you powered up the high beams. You are at fault, so is the brake checker but you started it, learn to let it go!
Maybe intentionally blinding a driver from the rear because they passed and merged at a safe distance had something to do with being held at fault swerving into another lane that contained a semi..... just guessing tho...
yea i get pissed off when people cut me off but at the end of the day my car is important to me and i definitely wont do stupid shit like this to fuck my car up for no reason
@@BuccaneerBruce that was not close…I see exactly why u think it was close: but look at their wheels when they started to change lanes, watch the wheels
Eaither way the cammer shouldn't have flashed their high beams at the other driver that only sets off a chain of events with the white car braking hard/brake checking causing the cammer to swerve into the other lane and they didn't check their blindspot and the semi was there and got hit
Freaking idiot is a menace... Did you notice how reckless he kept walking on the other side of the road?.. That car coming could've hit the moron, if that driver hadn't slowed down.. 🙄
Yeah, the text says the explorer was charged because he vanished from the scene. But this guy obviously has footage clearly showing him Jay walking and the cause of the accident
@@Mommyoftt2010 Don`t think the Explorer got ticketed and charged for causing the accident but not avoiding it by not keeping enough distance to the small truck. What do you call it in english, a 3.5 tonner?
@@jasonbourne875 Still doesn't make sense why they were ticketed in the first place because the large truck was probably blocking their view and they couldn't see what was happening ahead of them. I can't tell though, it may look closer than it really was.
@@mckennarose6259 Blocking their view? Your only concentration should be on the vehicle in front of you. Seems like you are part of the problem on the roads as it was explained perfectly to you already.
6:53 dude could've just stopped. Even though the SUV driver is at fault I know for a fact this driver saw them pulling in front of him and he had plenty of time to stop but he just kept accelerating
Yea I was about to comment on that too. He has soo much time to avoid that accident but nope. Basically got the"I got the right of way so I'll just ram in to her"-feeling from that clip.
@@hafentoffen2 Officers will try their best to make sure you at least tried to avoid collision. I was driving on a rainy day and woman crossed in front of me out of the center turning lane. I slammed my brakes and turned the wheel away from her but unfortunately my tires just slid on the wet road. The officer asked me how I reacted and I told him what I did and when I told him how it went down, he cited her at fault saying it was a clear cut case for me.
I live in SC. Drivers here aren't really observant or situationally aware. I've witnessed a car wreck a few years back of a similar occurrence. Vehicle was turning left off of the towns Blvd and the vehicle beside me didn't slow down. Resulted in a collision with the two vehicles. I didn't stick around, but I did call it in. In hindsight, I should've stuck around, atleast for a moment, to inquire if anyone needed medical.
Was it just me, or did the driver of the truck SPEED UP? He CLEARLY saw the SUV . . . I try to put myself in these scenarios, and for me, my foot was automatically hitting the brakes, NOT the accelrator!
There's no way to know whether or not the driver saw the SUV, but it seems significantly more plausible that they were accelerating to get back up to speed after having just come out of a turn and failed to look in that general direction than for them to have been intentionally ramming another vehicle. Dangerous driving, but not malicious.
It's crazy how easily people get their feels hurt behind the wheel First clip "That car past me, I better crank my high beams at him to let him know I'm supposed to be number 1. How dare he." I'm glad you're at fault and I'm glad it bit you in the ass. Learn from it.
Agreed...even after being deemed at fault he still has the nerve to point out that brake checks are illegal...so is blinding people with your high beams,wich he did first,not only is he at fault for the rear ending,he's also the instigator of road rage...hope it costs him lots for the damages...no compassion with self assigned road judges.
If that would’ve happened to me the person in the white car would have been toast. Brake check me you will pay the price. And yes I live in the area. Trying to change lanes hit a truck was the wrong thing to do
Can we talk about the cammer who had their ROOF SLICED OFF and lived to tell the tale?! Like, that's one of those stories nobody would believe unless they saw it.
I think he means they took his roof off to get him out of his vehicle. If the roof was taken clean off during the accident he wouldn’t be here to comment on it.
So true. Most of these drivers “think” defensive driving is ROW or “my blinker was on” They don’t even know the first thing about being a defensive driver.
6:54 How dont you see her crossing the lanes to go straight? You just pulled out your turn and weren't going fast. A little awareness could've avoided that one easily.
@7:20 Regardless of whether or not the other driver was paying attention or trying to squeeze in ahead of the cammer you can clearly see that the cammer was more concerned with not allowing the other car ahead of him and decided to speed up and even turned into the car when they connected.
"Apparently I'm at fault for an accident I caused for being too stupid to drive and following too closely. I wonder why that is. Why am I responsible?"
Fr and they probably thought submitting it here they’d get a ton of people who agree with them - nope. Lol. Just confirmed that they are the idiot at fault 💀😂
I don't believe the cammer when he says the other driver was found to be at fault and their insurance paid to fix his Xterra. In fact, if you look at the lane markings, the cammer's lane was the one that ended and he should have yielded to the other driver.
Along with the previous one. What are drivers doing if not looking at what's going on around them(no need to answer). No situational awareness whatsoever in a lot of these.
7:00 So some old lady slowly passes across ll the 4 lanes, and the driver clearly sees her. but yet proceeds to hit her. Just simple breaking would have resolved the situation. But too many drivers rather hit somebody because they are right.
That last clip... as a DD driver, myself, you really gotta get used to missing turns here and there and how to handle it. Just go to the next intersection and make a (proper/legal) u-turn and the GPS will adjust accordingly. People seem so afraid to miss turns while doing deliveries.
Well said. As a professional racing driver, when I'm on regular roads, I see people miss their turn and act like the MUST do whatever it takes to u-turn to that specific exit.
It's that old adage "Good drivers sometimes miss their (exit/turn), but bad drivers never do" Seriously. Although I agree with the captions that the VW driver is insane and needs to be stopped.
It is good to see for sure! I backed into a car a few years back after being DD all night. It was foggy, I'd been driving for a couple hours and boom. Hit the parked car before I knew it. It was like 4am, I didn't wanna wake them so I wrote a note with my details for contact with an apology for the trouble. My insurance was pissed about it tho lol.
it makes me happy seeing other drivers check on the drivers involved in the accident to see if they’re injured . to others it’s probably the bare minimum one could do but it’s nice seeing compassion in any situation .
Nah that was pure road rage on both parts. He braked because he wasn’t happy about being high beamed. Classic way of calling out an asshole on the 401!
I don't know what he expected his insurance to do. He left his lane and hit the truck. I still don't get the high beam thing. All that does is blind the person in front of you and make is dangerous for everyone on the road.
"This guy passed me so let me use my high beams to show my dominance!" (Car brakes in front of him causing him to hit the truck in the other lane). "Wow, what a jerk! All I did was blind him!"
The cammer car was just as much, if not more to blame. How do you got from 80-91mph and then pretend like whatever happens isn't your fault? It is illegal to block someone from merging. And that much ego, to not want to be passed, they shouldn't be driving either. If they had not accelerated, nothing would have happened.
Also, maybe its just me but that clip lacks context. Ive seen videos of cammers brake check, then accelerate hard to cut off passers intentionally then clip the clip so it shows them in a good light(insurance scam maybe?). Someone else above me mentioned the GPS speed. Cammer definitely accelerated to prevent a pass after driving slow in the fast lane. I hope the cops get the full footage from him. That ladies lawyer should reach out...takes 2 idiots to cause an accident.
@3:05. This is why I NEVER stop to let people pull out blindly into traffic. Just because someone stops to allow you to pull out doesn’t mean it’s safe to do so.
@@nthgth True ! I was in the middle lane of a heavily congested city street and traffic was at a standstill because of red light. I was blocking someone from pulling out of a side street and I guess they thought I was just being a jerk. When I was able to proceed forward the “nice” person behind me let the person out to blindly cross three lanes of traffic. BAM !! The car in the fast lane hit them! I looked in the rear view mirror and said “ And that’s why I don’t let people out” !
I remember when I was in 1st grade, we were walking in line to, class? I don’t remember, but I do remember that I was sleepy, started dozing off while walking and walked head first into a metal beam, and I swear that it sounded just like it not very close to that bang.
Counterpoint..who the hell sees someone obviously leaving in a car and parks behind them? When there's 2 lanes in the driveway one being wide open. My first thought would be "oh sh*t..he intentionally blocked me in. I'm being robbed."
@@stevenlillard4243the counter argument is too reverse into someone’s car who is robbing you and stop? She clearly realized there was someone there after she hit them not before
@JP07ize Plus, just because it looks easy to spot on camera doesn't always mean that the driver would see the same thing. Me being a truck driver can tell you that all too well.
absolutely, but in fairness, i don't disagree with ticketing the Expedition either though. The whole point of safe following distance is being able to stop in time to not cause a collision in an emergency like this.
lol good luck with that! dudes a hero. sorry you're stuck in a govt registered, traceable vehicle, meanwhile homies out here free as a bird and can't be found!
As someone who works along side highway patrol daily, you’ve got to maintain a good following distance. It doesn’t matter if that person throws it into park on the Interstate, if you have enough distance, you won’t have a collision
23:00 That VW hit the Prius on purpose. Yes the Prius was very much in the wrong but he could have easily come to a complete stop. OK... I just finished the clip... .VW guy is nuts.
Yeah absolutely, Prius driver in the wrong, but VW blaring horn and flashing lights instead of stopping. Clearly was slow enough and had time to come to stop. He hit the guys on purpose.
@@Tmoyer98 Class A here buttercup. I've been cut off more by Prius and Tesla drivers than anybody else expecting me to stop on a dime. I bet you drive a Prius. My condolences.
Someone made a fair point in a different comment. We see these accidents through a camera that is positioned so that there are no obstacles blocking the lens. However, when you drive there is an obstacle blocking your ability to have full view; the frame of your car. It is a possibility that the frame of his car kept the SUV hidden from his sight until it was too late. I drive for a living and I have had moments where cars came out of nowhere just because they were hidden by the frame of my truck.
Right?! And it was an old man that was unresponsive… completely avoidable. “I did hit my brakes but my ABS light was on.” Well you could’ve started braking a football field back dude. Hope that man was okay
@@Mommyoftt2010 never braked once. Avs excuse is a lie. He was anticipating the car clearing g the intersection so he could squeeze by at his normal speed while honking 5hw whole way. It's a stereotypical masshole driver
20:23 um, passing a tractor trailer on the right is a dumb thing to do. The white car was signaling a lane change. This was completely avoidable and it is mostly the fault of the cammer who was probably riding in the tractor trailer’s blind spot for a while.
I disagree. He's in his own driveway and had just got into the car and 5 seconds ago there was nothing behind his car. That said using your mirrors as you back out of your driveway is still required to prevent hitting a potential passing pedestrian on the sidewalk.
First video. They found you at fault because you were completely at fault. You didn't like his driving so you aggressively rode his ass, high beamed him then swerved into another lane to avoid a bump into a rear end, almost getting yourself killed in the process. You threw a tantrum, pissed off the wrong guy and drove like an incompetent.
Bro, honestly some of these could have been avoided. I swear some of the drivers purposely hit other cars when they know the other car made a mistake. Instead of letting it pass they ride it all the way out
18:19 The Milwaukee roundabout is almost as much fun as the 11 foot 8 bridge! To me, though, the most remarkable part of this clip is that there was someone out on those frozen streets on a motorcycle.
3:00 Another great example of FOLLOW THE LAW. Don't try to be nice and let people "cut through". At BEST that would have only ended up with the car stuck and blocking both lanes until they could go. There are laws for a reason. They can wait until it's clear or back up and try another road.
Yeah, most of these cammer-involved accidents could have been avoided by defensive driving. I have a cam. It did not give me any superpowers. So I still practice defensive driving.
7:15. Highly doubt they were found at fault since it is in fact your lane that is ending and not her's. you also very obviously steered into her. unbelievable.
I've rewatched that several times and I can't tell which lane is technically the one that ends. Most areas around me that have a lane ending have a sign saying "Lane ends, merge left/right" depending on which one ends. Though I do think it's usually the right lane that ends, but not always. Based on the way it looks I'd say it was the other car's lane that was ending as the cammer just stays to the right the whole time. That bit about "steering into them" isn't an aggressive turn. It was slight, likely as a result of them (finally) noticing the car to their left. It's natural to steer in the direction you're looking which is why there's an actual issue with cop cars being hit after pulling someone over, because as cars go to pass by they're looking at the lights and drift towards it. As they loved saying on the show Canada's Worst Driver, "Look where you want to go." Either way, though, both were far too oblivious to their surroundings.
If you just look at the lines on the the road you can clearly see that the lady’s lane does in fact end and merge into his. So she is at fault for the accident.
@@mariellegarrett7536 honestly looks to me like the right lane curves to the left lane, the solid white line on the road seems to be curving to the left, but oh well.
@@minnesotavideos4487 The white line on the right side does curve but that’s because the road itself curves but if you look at the yellow line in the middle of the road you can see it curving to the right merging the left lane into the right. I think the fact that the accident happened in a curve makes it a little bit difficult to tell from the video.
First clip - insurance is 100% correct. Even if you had rear ended him, I bet they still would have found the driver at fault for instigating the whole thing with his high beams just because he wants to play traffic cop.
It just amazes me, both from watching these videos and personal experience, that when people turn their signals on, that it automatically allows them to make the lane change.
@@KB-nt7eg : your reading comprehension skills are lacking. I did not say every driver or all people. Also, based on your response, you must be guilty of doing this.
@@deepsleep7822 my reading comprehension? You have a problem with English. Words do mean things. Specific words mean things too, or the lack thereof. Just because someone disagrees with something you said, doesn't mean they're guilty of anything, snowflake. Go back to school.
If you’re driving defensively, you let them over cause it’s easier to see the turn signal and let them in - then lose your whole car cause it was totaled. They’d be at fault, but is it worth you and your passengers safety? I personally wait until it’s clear, but when I see others with theirs on and they are CLEARLY going into my lane - I LET THEM. Novice concept really, but my car and my life are worth more than being ahead of them in the lane. 🤦🏻♀️😂
5:30 Took me a second to realize that the text is from the guy who tried to make the turn and the footage must have been provided by the car that witnessed the accident.
In the first clip, maybe you shouldn't turn on your high beams and flood light into the persons car. I know how that is and how hard it can be to see when someone is doing it. I don't think it was a brake check i think they slowed down because they couldn't see. The accident was caused by you. Learn to fucking drive and have some respect for others driving.
:39 Definitely cammer’s fault because he wanted to instigate it by flashing his bright lights. Break checking someone is a terrible thing to do but in my opinion he deserved it and I probably would’ve done that too tbh
Yeah pretty poor start to the video lol. If he hadn't turned on the high beams on a second time to antagonize the driver in front of them, it wouldn't have happened.
12:45 reminds me a bit of when I was younger and it was me, my mom, my grandma and our neighbor driving to I don't remember where, and a car started backing out from a driveway. My mom served and the guy kept back out and still hit us. Nobody got seriously hurt but he claimed he didn't see us.
It surprises me that in a country that is seen as litigation mad, folks seem to be allowed to drive around with either no or very minimum vehicle insurance!
@Jason Boyd Similar here, my wife got rear ended by a chap with no insurance and we ended up picking up the whole tab. Far as I know he was prosecuted but I suspect he only got a fine that would be way less that the £2500 our insurance paid.
This is just to strange! If on party is uninsured or uncaught , the guarantee fund that all insurance companies pays into should cover it, and the corporation/umbrella organisation that manages the fund would pursue compensation from the uninsured.
1) Yep. You try to avoid collision, resulting in crossing into lane of another vehicle , you are at fault . My father tried to avoid a collision and put his car into the curb to avoid hitting the other vehicle that had cut him off, the insurance said he was responsible for the damage because he avoided the car. He said don't worry, next time I won't try to avoid the collision .
7:30 If her car was ahead at the zipper merge YOU are at fault for failing to yield, that's how the law works regardless of what your Insurance claims.
The person videoing was at fault. Their lane ended not the other way around. You can see they blurred out the right lane ends sign just before the traffic light.
2:28 That the pedestrian disappeared should not make a big difference. It's your obligation as a driver to make sure to always be able to stop immediately if you come to a crossroad or a traffic light. The driver of the Ford was to fast and didn't hold enough distance from the car in front of him. Safety distance is not a joke you could follow it is something you should follow and many does not.
I have a lot of respect for those that see an accident they are not a part of, but help the situation by sharing the dash cam videos with law enforcement and accident victims and seeing if e ermine is ok
the first clip was satisfying, over doing it with the flashes. I dont see what the white car did wrong, yeah maybe it was a bit of a jackass move to overtake like that, but the cammer got served some SWEET karma
@@smiley165 Agree with you that it doesn't look like he was speeding but that he doesn't need to be to hydroplane and it's even worse with worn tyres. Excessive speed for the conditions is more accurate.
@@smiley165 speed limit or not, I think a big thing people tend to not take seriously is the fact that the speed limit is for optimal conditions. It’s very clear that in the video, they’re are not optimal. And my guess is that the dudes tires probably didn’t have much tread either. It’s okay to go slow when need be. Better safe than sorry.
1:35 So you sped up from at least 80mph, all the way to 91mph just to stop some lady from passing you and block her from merging over and then say the OTHER driver shouldn't be on the road!? Cammer caused that accident. If they don't mash the throttle, no contact happens.
That lady caused that accident. #1 you don’t pass a car on the right. #2 you don’t merge into a lane that doesn’t have sufficient clearance. Just because she wants to get over, doesn’t mean she gets to do whatever she wants. She still has to wait for it to be safe to do so. She turned into his lane, and caused the accident. Case closed.
Submit your clips here: forms.gle/7LKzTdvHwnmZmZ439
Follow me on:
Instagram: instagram.com/dashcamless...
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@dashcamlessons
Facebook: facebook.com/dashcamlessons
Where’s the music tony
Yet again @7:27 instead of slowing down by just a couple mph and letting mr entitled impatient ass pull ahead as to avoid any unnecessary damage the cammer instead decided to turn into the impact. People are so ridiculously self centered and selfish anymore that there is virtually no humanity left in this world. Nobody is legitimately nice and helpful and considerate anymore. It's all about "gimme gimme gimme mine mine mine and fu*k you to anyone that inconveniences me in even the slightest most insignificant way!" All of that just from 1 small video clip haha lol. Imagine what I could do with 30 minutes
😊
U should provide closed caption to deaf person who can’t hear ur voice on tv !! U are break the law because u don’t provide closed caption ! Or u will get trouble with the law of America disability assistance!!!!
Learn how to spell
First clip. Your insurance is right, you're at fault. It wasn't a rear end collision. You swerved into the semi when you should've had enough time space to stop.
Funny how the video is not available anymore. I guess he got plenty of comment about his recklessness driving.
Also just gotta add, brake checking isn't "highly Illegally" dick move sure but not illegal lol. Cammer got what he deserved.
Agreed. It almost seemed like the only reason he hit the brights is because the other car was speeding. As far as I could tell they weren't being overly aggressive about their speeding either.
@@RoamingRyan It looked to me like they passed him and hurt his feelings. Then he thought putting on his brights and speeding up behind them was the right thing to do. His insurance proved otherwise.
Cammer brighted the speeder initially 'cause he changed lanes with no signal pretty darn close in front of the cammer. Remember, the camera adds 10lbs, no...wait...that's not right. It doesn't show how close things really are. I always get those confused.
But, yeah, too close after that. Shoulda slowed down and don't kick the hornet's nest.
IMHO, a cammer should always be responsible for these types of accidents even if he didn't swerve into the other lane. Start slowing down way early or change lanes. Expect the unexpected like a festering a-hole out of left field. Buuut, the brake-checker should face far higher consequences in total. Their ins. co. should drop 'em or triple their rates for the reckless brake check. It'd be one thing if the speeder had to stop due to normal driving issues, but to jam on your brakes to try and cause an accident and succeed? It should be reckless driving and be far more expensive for the brake checkers of the world.
Starting off with the provocative high-beams into brakecheck to the "iT wAsN't My fAuLt". Ah, this will be a classic.
reading about provocative high beams made me think about lights in lingerie
That one was a joke. Insurance company is right to charge the cammer as he instigated and antagonized the other driver. A little defensive driving and just letting it go would have saved him.
Love the "brake checks are highly illegal", so is blinding the approaching cars and the one that brake checked you, after you powered up the high beams. You are at fault, so is the brake checker but you started it, learn to let it go!
@Zilla Deliva don't blame the men. Women mostly do that. White guys tend just to give a light flash and go about their day.
Probably, his highest level of education is Pre-School. I can only imagine he would be crying to his Mom like, “Mommy. This caw bweak checked me.” 🤣
Maybe intentionally blinding a driver from the rear because they passed and merged at a safe distance had something to do with being held at fault swerving into another lane that contained a semi..... just guessing tho...
The white car didn't merge at a safe distance, he swerved over pretty damn close, but the cammer is at fault.
yea i get pissed off when people cut me off but at the end of the day my car is important to me and i definitely wont do stupid shit like this to fuck my car up for no reason
@@BuccaneerBruce that was not close…I see exactly why u think it was close: but look at their wheels when they started to change lanes, watch the wheels
Surprised that one didn't have the obligatory "the camera lens makes it look further than it really was" lmao
Eaither way the cammer shouldn't have flashed their high beams at the other driver that only sets off a chain of events with the white car braking hard/brake checking causing the cammer to swerve into the other lane and they didn't check their blindspot and the semi was there and got hit
01:57 - That pedestrian should have been sought out, ticketed and assessed for all the liability.
Freaking idiot is a menace... Did you notice how reckless he kept walking on the other side of the road?.. That car coming could've hit the moron, if that driver hadn't slowed down.. 🙄
Yeah, the text says the explorer was charged because he vanished from the scene. But this guy obviously has footage clearly showing him Jay walking and the cause of the accident
@@Mommyoftt2010 Don`t think the Explorer got ticketed and charged for causing the accident but not avoiding it by not keeping enough distance to the small truck. What do you call it in english, a 3.5 tonner?
@@jasonbourne875 Still doesn't make sense why they were ticketed in the first place because the large truck was probably blocking their view and they couldn't see what was happening ahead of them. I can't tell though, it may look closer than it really was.
@@mckennarose6259 Blocking their view? Your only concentration should be on the vehicle in front of you. Seems like you are part of the problem on the roads as it was explained perfectly to you already.
6:53 dude could've just stopped. Even though the SUV driver is at fault I know for a fact this driver saw them pulling in front of him and he had plenty of time to stop but he just kept accelerating
Yea I was about to comment on that too. He has soo much time to avoid that accident but nope. Basically got the"I got the right of way so I'll just ram in to her"-feeling from that clip.
@@hafentoffen2 Officers will try their best to make sure you at least tried to avoid collision. I was driving on a rainy day and woman crossed in front of me out of the center turning lane. I slammed my brakes and turned the wheel away from her but unfortunately my tires just slid on the wet road. The officer asked me how I reacted and I told him what I did and when I told him how it went down, he cited her at fault saying it was a clear cut case for me.
I live in SC. Drivers here aren't really observant or situationally aware. I've witnessed a car wreck a few years back of a similar occurrence. Vehicle was turning left off of the towns Blvd and the vehicle beside me didn't slow down. Resulted in a collision with the two vehicles. I didn't stick around, but I did call it in. In hindsight, I should've stuck around, atleast for a moment, to inquire if anyone needed medical.
Was it just me, or did the driver of the truck SPEED UP? He CLEARLY saw the SUV . . . I try to put myself in these scenarios, and for me, my foot was automatically hitting the brakes, NOT the accelrator!
There's no way to know whether or not the driver saw the SUV, but it seems significantly more plausible that they were accelerating to get back up to speed after having just come out of a turn and failed to look in that general direction than for them to have been intentionally ramming another vehicle. Dangerous driving, but not malicious.
It's crazy how easily people get their feels hurt behind the wheel
First clip "That car past me, I better crank my high beams at him to let him know I'm supposed to be number 1. How dare he."
I'm glad you're at fault and I'm glad it bit you in the ass. Learn from it.
exactly. just cause you have a dashcam, doesn’t always mean you’re in the right lmao.
Agreed...even after being deemed at fault he still has the nerve to point out that brake checks are illegal...so is blinding people with your high beams,wich he did first,not only is he at fault for the rear ending,he's also the instigator of road rage...hope it costs him lots for the damages...no compassion with self assigned road judges.
If that would’ve happened to me the person in the white car would have been toast. Brake check me you will pay the price. And yes I live in the area. Trying to change lanes hit a truck was the wrong thing to do
@@DCSPORTSTER He should've just let it go. At the end he gained nothing.
@@usmantariq7997 Exactly. I believe the saying goes 'Play stupid games, win stupid prizes'.
Can we talk about the cammer who had their ROOF SLICED OFF and lived to tell the tale?! Like, that's one of those stories nobody would believe unless they saw it.
I think he means they took his roof off to get him out of his vehicle. If the roof was taken clean off during the accident he wouldn’t be here to comment on it.
@@stevewilliams8590 that’s not true lmao there’s been plenty of cases where roofs have been taken off cars and ppl survive.
That shits my nightmare
A lot of these could have been avoided with some defensive driving.
You don't do a "some defensive driving." You're either intelligent and defensive drive, or you don't.
defensive driving is not hte right word for him. Awareness driving is best for it.
Most of them learned to drive from video games.
@@tomjoad1363 That is also true but the first few they were driving pretty aggressive.
So true.
Most of these drivers “think” defensive driving is ROW or “my blinker was on”
They don’t even know the first thing about being a defensive driver.
6:54 How dont you see her crossing the lanes to go straight? You just pulled out your turn and weren't going fast. A little awareness could've avoided that one easily.
Lady still at flat, however completely avoidable
If he was actually paying attention he could either swerved away or just came to a complete stop but no lemme just drive more and hit their car 🤦🏽♂️
Who's got time to pay attention to the road when there's phones to play with?
Yeah, that guy's an idiot...he's like, she's doing something she shouldn't so I'm just going to hit her.
To me, the pickup is at fault. He has the vw in his sight and decided to floor it. I doubt the actual assessment was women at fault.
@7:20 Regardless of whether or not the other driver was paying attention or trying to squeeze in ahead of the cammer you can clearly see that the cammer was more concerned with not allowing the other car ahead of him and decided to speed up and even turned into the car when they connected.
Steering into a collision after the impact is actually the correct action to take. Spot on with the rest of your assessment, though.
"Apparently I'm at fault for an accident I caused for being too stupid to drive and following too closely. I wonder why that is. Why am I responsible?"
Fr and they probably thought submitting it here they’d get a ton of people who agree with them - nope. Lol. Just confirmed that they are the idiot at fault 💀😂
ayyy nice profile picture lol
7:40 that was the most gentle head on collision I've ever seen. The cars just wanted a lil smooch lmao
The clip and this comment made me laugh 😭🤣
Went back to rewatch the clip because of this comment lmao.
they kith 😚 lmaoooo
Just a lil “mwa” before _crash_
The woman was even crying, she was so overwhelmed by the love 🥹
7:15 was completely avoidable. I guess defensive driving is thrown out the window once you get a dashcam???
I don't believe the cammer when he says the other driver was found to be at fault and their insurance paid to fix his Xterra. In fact, if you look at the lane markings, the cammer's lane was the one that ended and he should have yielded to the other driver.
Offensive driving cammer turned into him 🤦♂️
Horrible road design, no sign or markings to indicate merge and which lane ends.
On top of that the VW was already in front of the cammer.
Along with the previous one. What are drivers doing if not looking at what's going on around them(no need to answer). No situational awareness whatsoever in a lot of these.
I live in Brockton and can confirm that this merge section is a disaster.
Am I the only one that watches these before bed? I fall asleep to the soothing sounds of screeching tires and horns blaring😅
7:00 So some old lady slowly passes across ll the 4 lanes, and the driver clearly sees her. but yet proceeds to hit her. Just simple breaking would have resolved the situation. But too many drivers rather hit somebody because they are right.
I mean tbf if ur in the right u don’t really care about the other person ( in this situation)
@@visualrevolution525 Really? You just keep driving forward, hitting the other car, damage your own, risking injuries. All because you are right.
@@ronjonchef2045 nah they want that money for scratches 💀
Exactly my thoughts.
@@visualrevolution525 There is no situation in which that is at all appropriate. Fault doesn't matter. If you can avoid an accident, avoid it.
"apparently, my insurance deemed me at fault" hahaha
Unsafe lane change is not breaking the law either
"apparently everyone else in the universe has a clue about how to drive but me" is what he should have posted.
2:20 the guy walks off like he could care less he just caused an accident wow. People amaze me sometimes.
RIGHT LIKE WTF
Because he's entitled, and knows full well that is someone hits him that will be at fault due to our broken justice system.
He could've injured or killed a driver and he doesn't care. It's truly disgusting. Hope he gets karma.
They usually are very inconsiderate nothing matters except what they do I work in Miami a lot I’m not talking up some bs
Russian pedestrians cause all kinds of accidents and they just walk away.
That last clip... as a DD driver, myself, you really gotta get used to missing turns here and there and how to handle it. Just go to the next intersection and make a (proper/legal) u-turn and the GPS will adjust accordingly. People seem so afraid to miss turns while doing deliveries.
I agree, that’s what I did when I used to do Uber.
Exactly! I’ve missed plenty of turns and even actual delivery spots, just find a place to do a legal turn around or go around the block!!
Well said. As a professional racing driver, when I'm on regular roads, I see people miss their turn and act like the MUST do whatever it takes to u-turn to that specific exit.
As a drunk driver yourself? Lol jk I know what you mean
It's that old adage "Good drivers sometimes miss their (exit/turn), but bad drivers never do"
Seriously. Although I agree with the captions that the VW driver is insane and needs to be stopped.
12:56
A round of applause for the couple that let go of their pride and admitted fault; you don’t see much of that.
As well as #8 at 3:53
It is good to see for sure! I backed into a car a few years back after being DD all night. It was foggy, I'd been driving for a couple hours and boom. Hit the parked car before I knew it. It was like 4am, I didn't wanna wake them so I wrote a note with my details for contact with an apology for the trouble. My insurance was pissed about it tho lol.
it makes me happy seeing other drivers check on the drivers involved in the accident to see if they’re injured . to others it’s probably the bare minimum one could do but it’s nice seeing compassion in any situation .
First clip : don't put your high lights on it blinds people so they brake .
Nah that was pure road rage on both parts. He braked because he wasn’t happy about being high beamed. Classic way of calling out an asshole on the 401!
I don't know what he expected his insurance to do. He left his lane and hit the truck. I still don't get the high beam thing. All that does is blind the person in front of you and make is dangerous for everyone on the road.
"This guy passed me so let me use my high beams to show my dominance!"
(Car brakes in front of him causing him to hit the truck in the other lane).
"Wow, what a jerk! All I did was blind him!"
@@smulk1200 lmao these clowns 🤡
Dont brake on highways even if an idiot shines a flashlight at ya genius.
18:19 As if the Milwaukee roundabout isn't epic enough, the car throws TP in celebration of their crash. Fantastic effort.
I thought it was cause he shit themselves!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
And he stuck the landing! 9.5/10
1:55
I’m glad they revoked her license after her 3rd offense. Unfortunately, that probably won’t keep her from getting behind the wheel.
cammer was just as much to blame. 80 to 91 mph to block her from passing.
That ain’t even the worst of it. When I got my license in NC the girl ahead of me in line was there for the 7th time to pass the test 🤦🏼♂️
The cammer car was just as much, if not more to blame. How do you got from 80-91mph and then pretend like whatever happens isn't your fault? It is illegal to block someone from merging. And that much ego, to not want to be passed, they shouldn't be driving either. If they had not accelerated, nothing would have happened.
@@chappy48 the other person shouldn't have been trying to make a pass in the right lane, and there wasn't even a signal to change lanes
Also, maybe its just me but that clip lacks context. Ive seen videos of cammers brake check, then accelerate hard to cut off passers intentionally then clip the clip so it shows them in a good light(insurance scam maybe?).
Someone else above me mentioned the GPS speed. Cammer definitely accelerated to prevent a pass after driving slow in the fast lane. I hope the cops get the full footage from him. That ladies lawyer should reach out...takes 2 idiots to cause an accident.
@3:05. This is why I NEVER stop to let people pull out blindly into traffic. Just because someone stops to allow you to pull out doesn’t mean it’s safe to do so.
It's why right-of-way ought not to be ceded. It leads to unpredictability, a recipe for disaster on the road
@@nthgth True ! I was in the middle lane of a heavily congested city street and traffic was at a standstill because of red light. I was blocking someone from pulling out of a side street and I guess they thought I was just being a jerk. When I was able to proceed forward the “nice” person behind me let the person out to blindly cross three lanes of traffic. BAM !! The car in the fast lane hit them! I looked in the rear view mirror and said “ And that’s why I don’t let people out” !
It’s really nice to see that people who have cameras stop and help, especially in this day and age. 🙏
20:54... just love how solid that pole is, I wonder how far away you can hear those collision with that pole. It has a nice ring to it.
haha
I remember when I was in 1st grade, we were walking in line to, class? I don’t remember, but I do remember that I was sleepy, started dozing off while walking and walked head first into a metal beam, and I swear that it sounded just like it not very close to that bang.
🤣🤣🤣
Oblivious driver hits curb, then pole. Then flings door open and jumps into traffic. We've got a real winner on our hands...
I will never understand why some drivers believe it is okay to make a turn from an outside lane! It boggles the mind!
5:55 Who the hell backs up their 1 ton vehicle and not look before going? That's on them.
Yeah they've demonstrated a complete lack of capability. They should be publicly executed
Counterpoint..who the hell sees someone obviously leaving in a car and parks behind them? When there's 2 lanes in the driveway one being wide open.
My first thought would be "oh sh*t..he intentionally blocked me in. I'm being robbed."
bro! no kidding. why back up if you dont look.
@@stevenlillard4243 so you would look behind you and see the person. Point proven 🤣 🤣 🤣
@@stevenlillard4243the counter argument is too reverse into someone’s car who is robbing you and stop? She clearly realized there was someone there after she hit them not before
4:01 finally someone recognizes when they're at fault
Kind of. Cammer claimed to not see the car he hit yet he aggressively accelerated in what seemed to be an attempt to beat that car
@@JayPee0521 no, he claimed that he thought they had a red light as the suv stopped and made an assumption the other car was going to stop as well
@JP07ize
Plus, just because it looks easy to spot on camera doesn't always mean that the driver would see the same thing. Me being a truck driver can tell you that all too well.
@@JayPee0521 What do you mean aggressive acceleration? The guy was at a near stop any acceleration could be considered "aggressive" at that point
@@hellboip7876 he definitely pushed the pedal down hard you can hear it in the video.
Imagine hearing the Android notification after the roof of your car gets ripped off☠️ 4:45
2:15 That pedestrian should be liable for all the damages done. 😡😡😡
right. and was caught on cam too. so clearly was jay walking a busy intersection without right of way. ticket him plus make him pay for all damages
Would have been easier to keep going. Let Darwin sort things out.
absolutely, but in fairness, i don't disagree with ticketing the Expedition either though. The whole point of safe following distance is being able to stop in time to not cause a collision in an emergency like this.
lol good luck with that! dudes a hero. sorry you're stuck in a govt registered, traceable vehicle, meanwhile homies out here free as a bird and can't be found!
@@DisturbedArcher lol keep crying!
Very first clip, you antagonize the driver a second time with your high beams you 100% are at fault for what happened. You could have just let it go.
0:47 why instigate a fight? You flash a guy because they are going faster then you? Check you ego
7:42 "Oh my *looks at camera before remembering to choose his words carefully* Goodness!" 😂😂
7:55 he acts like it's a 100mph wreck lmao
Stop the BigMacSam slander(bottom of his cam says it)
6:51 how the hell does the cammer run into this guy 😂😂
Exactly, YES, the other driver was at fault, but how do you not see that coming????
I KNOW, HE LITERALLY COULD HAVE HIT HIS BRAKES
Sometimes the windshield pillar blocks your view on that side. So it’s possible he truly didn’t see that car
Im not even...
@@leppard98 no, she was already pulling out when he accelerated out of turning.
Is it me or is there either no awareness shown by these drivers or they forget what the brake pedal is for?!?!
How else will they get content for their TH-cam channel? Got make that dashcam worth it
Damn sure they always remember the horn tho
14:45. It really blows my mind how many people turn from a middle lane… like where is the thought process? So many of these could have been avoided.
"Well the lane was clear a second ago..."
There is no thought process. This is why they need to be publicly executed
Most people are dum and the Vax made them worse.
“It was with geico and they paid everything” 😂😂😂 has me dead for some reason
As someone who works along side highway patrol daily, you’ve got to maintain a good following distance. It doesn’t matter if that person throws it into park on the Interstate, if you have enough distance, you won’t have a collision
23:00 That VW hit the Prius on purpose. Yes the Prius was very much in the wrong but he could have easily come to a complete stop. OK... I just finished the clip... .VW guy is nuts.
I've had wet dreams about doing that to a Prius. Driver's are the absolute worse. Clip further proves my point.
@@robertsims9201 Prius, and Tesla especially.
@@robertsims9201 you shouldn’t have a license. Cars aren’t toys.
Yeah absolutely, Prius driver in the wrong, but VW blaring horn and flashing lights instead of stopping. Clearly was slow enough and had time to come to stop. He hit the guys on purpose.
@@Tmoyer98 Class A here buttercup. I've been cut off more by Prius and Tesla drivers than anybody else expecting me to stop on a dime. I bet you drive a Prius. My condolences.
8:25 That crash was very dramatic movie like.
06:53 should hand their drivers license in if they failed to notice this hazard.
😭😭😭
I said the same thing!
How the hell did he not see that car?
Someone made a fair point in a different comment. We see these accidents through a camera that is positioned so that there are no obstacles blocking the lens. However, when you drive there is an obstacle blocking your ability to have full view; the frame of your car. It is a possibility that the frame of his car kept the SUV hidden from his sight until it was too late. I drive for a living and I have had moments where cars came out of nowhere just because they were hidden by the frame of my truck.
22:05 , cammer had about a month to avoid a collision ...
Right?! And it was an old man that was unresponsive… completely avoidable. “I did hit my brakes but my ABS light was on.” Well you could’ve started braking a football field back dude. Hope that man was okay
@@Mommyoftt2010 never braked once. Avs excuse is a lie. He was anticipating the car clearing g the intersection so he could squeeze by at his normal speed while honking 5hw whole way. It's a stereotypical masshole driver
I hate that "honk first, brake later" mentality
4:30
New driving fear unlocked
New Fear Unlocked: *Black Ice.*
20:23 um, passing a tractor trailer on the right is a dumb thing to do. The white car was signaling a lane change. This was completely avoidable and it is mostly the fault of the cammer who was probably riding in the tractor trailer’s blind spot for a while.
5:40 I'd say it's on him. He didn't look behind him before backing up.
Good thing it was a car he hit and not one of the neighbourhood children.
I disagree. He's in his own driveway and had just got into the car and 5 seconds ago there was nothing behind his car. That said using your mirrors as you back out of your driveway is still required to prevent hitting a potential passing pedestrian on the sidewalk.
@@RPG-oh1yf so you don’t disagree then 🤡 as stated driver should have all round observation before any manoeuvre
@@RPG-oh1yf He still is at fault for improper backing. Does not matter that he was in his driveway.
@@cjgrath218 No, I disagree that it's his fault for hitting a car that 5 seconds ago was not behind him in his own driveway.
3:00 they tried to blame it on the truck? For what? Driving normally? Omg
I purposely block people from doing that, sorry I'm not risking my life so you can save 1 min!
6:34 the “aw shit” before the bump is priceless
Reading the text explanation after the very 1st clip was the most satisfying experience I've had this week.
Love how cammer in clip one is totally clueless to why he's at fault. What a knob.
It's really nice of the drivers that have the accidents on camera to stop and offer the evidence!
FYI the one sliding on the ice that hit the “transformer “ was actually a cable tv underground box
Lol. I was looking for this comment. It should have had either an Amplifier or Line Extender in it.
Either way a lot of pissed off people who couldn't watch their show that night.
@@charlieodom9107 that’s just the ped. The tap is probably ripped off in his bumper still
@4:15 the song playing is animals by Architects. I highly recommend listening to it if you’re into metal and haven’t heard them before
First video. They found you at fault because you were completely at fault. You didn't like his driving so you aggressively rode his ass, high beamed him then swerved into another lane to avoid a bump into a rear end, almost getting yourself killed in the process. You threw a tantrum, pissed off the wrong guy and drove like an incompetent.
11:42 damn that pole barely even moved when the car hit it and the car was going fast as hell. That's how you learn the hard way I guess
12:00 home owner is clearly at fault for this incident, how dare they plant a tree there 😁😁
That tree clearly swerved into the guy's lane!
@@colormedubious4747 Exactly!!! It's roots also caused the pavement to buckle exacerbating the situation 😁😁
🤣🤣🤣
But it’s definitely s very solid tree
most definitely not a tree its a power pole lol
Bro, honestly some of these could have been avoided. I swear some of the drivers purposely hit other cars when they know the other car made a mistake. Instead of letting it pass they ride it all the way out
18:19 The Milwaukee roundabout is almost as much fun as the 11 foot 8 bridge! To me, though, the most remarkable part of this clip is that there was someone out on those frozen streets on a motorcycle.
Sadly they raised the bridge quite a bit...
03:12 i hate people who let out someone turning left into blind traffic
11:15 when you’re so angry you send your car threw a pole just to honk your horn at someone….. i guess that’s a fair a trade off😂
3:00 Another great example of FOLLOW THE LAW. Don't try to be nice and let people "cut through". At BEST that would have only ended up with the car stuck and blocking both lanes until they could go. There are laws for a reason. They can wait until it's clear or back up and try another road.
Yeah, most of these cammer-involved accidents could have been avoided by defensive driving. I have a cam. It did not give me any superpowers. So I still practice defensive driving.
Bingo.
Thank you a cammer with a brain. It's like a lot of these cammers that go on these channels, are just aggressive driving 24/7
I feel like atleast 20% of the American population shouldn't have a drivers license.
13:31 perfect timing with the radio 😂😂
7:15. Highly doubt they were found at fault since it is in fact your lane that is ending and not her's. you also very obviously steered into her. unbelievable.
I've rewatched that several times and I can't tell which lane is technically the one that ends. Most areas around me that have a lane ending have a sign saying "Lane ends, merge left/right" depending on which one ends. Though I do think it's usually the right lane that ends, but not always.
Based on the way it looks I'd say it was the other car's lane that was ending as the cammer just stays to the right the whole time. That bit about "steering into them" isn't an aggressive turn. It was slight, likely as a result of them (finally) noticing the car to their left. It's natural to steer in the direction you're looking which is why there's an actual issue with cop cars being hit after pulling someone over, because as cars go to pass by they're looking at the lights and drift towards it. As they loved saying on the show Canada's Worst Driver, "Look where you want to go."
Either way, though, both were far too oblivious to their surroundings.
Not that it matters but , this is a best of video.
This clip is old ,but was argued aggressively back and forth.
If you just look at the lines on the the road you can clearly see that the lady’s lane does in fact end and merge into his. So she is at fault for the accident.
@@mariellegarrett7536 honestly looks to me like the right lane curves to the left lane, the solid white line on the road seems to be curving to the left, but oh well.
@@minnesotavideos4487 The white line on the right side does curve but that’s because the road itself curves but if you look at the yellow line in the middle of the road you can see it curving to the right merging the left lane into the right. I think the fact that the accident happened in a curve makes it a little bit difficult to tell from the video.
First clip - insurance is 100% correct. Even if you had rear ended him, I bet they still would have found the driver at fault for instigating the whole thing with his high beams just because he wants to play traffic cop.
yo the clip @8:40 almost kinda cinematic...
1:38 I live in Durham and take that direction home every day from work. There’s always a crash and a 5 mile long line right there
Something I’ve learned from these videos; people in Florida don’t know how to drive
It just amazes me, both from watching these videos and personal experience, that when people turn their signals on, that it automatically allows them to make the lane change.
I like how you grouped every driver into that category who uses a blinker. You want to know how I know you suck at driving?
@@KB-nt7eg : your reading comprehension skills are lacking. I did not say every driver or all people. Also, based on your response, you must be guilty of doing this.
@@deepsleep7822 my reading comprehension? You have a problem with English. Words do mean things. Specific words mean things too, or the lack thereof. Just because someone disagrees with something you said, doesn't mean they're guilty of anything, snowflake. Go back to school.
@@deepsleep7822 mans is super guilty of it and hates being called out 😂
If you’re driving defensively, you let them over cause it’s easier to see the turn signal and let them in - then lose your whole car cause it was totaled. They’d be at fault, but is it worth you and your passengers safety? I personally wait until it’s clear, but when I see others with theirs on and they are CLEARLY going into my lane - I LET THEM. Novice concept really, but my car and my life are worth more than being ahead of them in the lane. 🤦🏻♀️😂
5:30 Took me a second to realize that the text is from the guy who tried to make the turn and the footage must have been provided by the car that witnessed the accident.
Did anyone see the toilet paper 🧻 flying through the air at 18:30 I think he's gonna need that when he gets out of the car lol
17:12 omg *inhale* omg *inhale* omg *yet another inhale* 😂😂 like an ol school wrasslin promo.
4:40 the andriod noises are killing me
6:52: Seems like the cammers fault, I could see the other car a mile away. you make no intent to stop and let her in.
He still has the right of way
In the first clip, maybe you shouldn't turn on your high beams and flood light into the persons car. I know how that is and how hard it can be to see when someone is doing it. I don't think it was a brake check i think they slowed down because they couldn't see. The accident was caused by you. Learn to fucking drive and have some respect for others driving.
:39 Definitely cammer’s fault because he wanted to instigate it by flashing his bright lights. Break checking someone is a terrible thing to do but in my opinion he deserved it and I probably would’ve done that too tbh
Cammer brightlighted the car without provocation. Jerk.
Right, totally justified to cause a huge wreck because someone annoyed you with lights🤔
Don't forget, it's authorized towing only!
@@nickarganbright7218 Maybe he couldn't see so he was slowing down. The cammer is so smart he swerves into an 18-wheeler.
Nick what if the person had an astigmatism? And the cammer was blinding them? High beaming someone is just as bad you pos :)
3:57 Cammer at fault, you shoud have been paying attention.
People who hit another car and drive away are such cowards
20:34 you are 100% at fault for rear ending that car!
he literally sped up to not let the other car thru! some cammers are idiots 🤦🏼♀️
@@jillmason2776 yup and he hit also the other car intentionally… If he is providing the video to police he will get in trouble!
first one is because the thought it was fine to turn his high beams on. play stupid games win stupid prizes...
I wanted to say that! Why put ur high beams? It does nothing but intimidate the driver in front of you!
Highly deserved too, that person was way ahead of them in their lane.
Yeah pretty poor start to the video lol. If he hadn't turned on the high beams on a second time to antagonize the driver in front of them, it wouldn't have happened.
Yep well deserved 👏
9:58 Cable box. Not a transformer. You probably just knocked out internet for the block
Agreed, definitely not a transformer!! Cable for the entire block is gone for sure.
My thoughts lol gives me job security but damn some people aren’t smart
So many of these could’ve been easily avoided. I feel like some are chasing that insurance check
12:45 reminds me a bit of when I was younger and it was me, my mom, my grandma and our neighbor driving to I don't remember where, and a car started backing out from a driveway. My mom served and the guy kept back out and still hit us. Nobody got seriously hurt but he claimed he didn't see us.
It surprises me that in a country that is seen as litigation mad, folks seem to be allowed to drive around with either no or very minimum vehicle insurance!
@Jason Boyd Similar here, my wife got rear ended by a chap with no insurance and we ended up picking up the whole tab. Far as I know he was prosecuted but I suspect he only got a fine that would be way less that the £2500 our insurance paid.
This is just to strange! If on party is uninsured or uncaught , the guarantee fund that all insurance companies pays into should cover it, and the corporation/umbrella organisation that manages the fund would pursue compensation from the uninsured.
1) Yep. You try to avoid collision, resulting in crossing into lane of another vehicle , you are at fault . My father tried to avoid a collision and put his car into the curb to avoid hitting the other vehicle that had cut him off, the insurance said he was responsible for the damage because he avoided the car. He said don't worry, next time I won't try to avoid the collision .
Glad he learned his lesson! 😎👍
And then have your rates go up when you rear end. Lose/Lose 9/10 times.
Okay guys. 1:07 what are the odds of an accident insurance commercial playing at the same time there is an accident?
My mom always told me to look left then right and left again 😅 Most of these accidents are avoidable 😅
It might not be illegal to brake check. Also, it is the driver's responsibility to keep a safe distance from the car ahead.
7:30 If her car was ahead at the zipper merge YOU are at fault for failing to yield, that's how the law works regardless of what your Insurance claims.
The person videoing was at fault. Their lane ended not the other way around. You can see they blurred out the right lane ends sign just before the traffic light.
Imagine being that person on the corner in Downey CA and that accident coming at you!
Looking at some of these videos, I’m thinking of turning in my drivers license. I think I’ll start traveling by pogo stick.
2:28 That the pedestrian disappeared should not make a big difference. It's your obligation as a driver to make sure to always be able to stop immediately if you come to a crossroad or a traffic light. The driver of the Ford was to fast and didn't hold enough distance from the car in front of him. Safety distance is not a joke you could follow it is something you should follow and many does not.
I have a lot of respect for those that see an accident they are not a part of, but help the situation by sharing the dash cam videos with law enforcement and accident victims and seeing if e ermine is ok
the first clip was satisfying, over doing it with the flashes. I dont see what the white car did wrong, yeah maybe it was a bit of a jackass move to overtake like that, but the cammer got served some SWEET karma
4:29 Cammer speeding on a wet road spins out due to their driving, and blames "black ice" Yeah sure bro we all believe you 🙄
I'm more worried about that trucker. Was he too drunk to notice the collision, or just being an ass that day?
Black ice in pouring rain? Bald ass tires in a state that barely gets rain more like it
Bet that semi going 65 ish. Most semis top out at that. But sure state your opinion. Dude was prob doing the speed limit
@@smiley165 Agree with you that it doesn't look like he was speeding but that he doesn't need to be to hydroplane and it's even worse with worn tyres.
Excessive speed for the conditions is more accurate.
@@smiley165 speed limit or not, I think a big thing people tend to not take seriously is the fact that the speed limit is for optimal conditions. It’s very clear that in the video, they’re are not optimal. And my guess is that the dudes tires probably didn’t have much tread either. It’s okay to go slow when need be. Better safe than sorry.
1:35 So you sped up from at least 80mph, all the way to 91mph just to stop some lady from passing you and block her from merging over and then say the OTHER driver shouldn't be on the road!? Cammer caused that accident. If they don't mash the throttle, no contact happens.
The bad thing is people like that submit these and still try to claim they weren't in the wrong. God forbid someone tries to pass them.
LMFAOOOOOOOOOI !!!!!
I thought I was the only one that noticed that.
@@coltonboydlee you can’t pass people on the right. Literally how do you people justify this shit is beyond me
That lady caused that accident. #1 you don’t pass a car on the right. #2 you don’t merge into a lane that doesn’t have sufficient clearance. Just because she wants to get over, doesn’t mean she gets to do whatever she wants. She still has to wait for it to be safe to do so. She turned into his lane, and caused the accident. Case closed.
Some people in America react so stupidly when they see or are involved in an accident! It's like the most exciting thing that's ever happened to them!