Hearthstone Theory: Rise of Shadows Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 199

  • @GrilledLeeks
    @GrilledLeeks 5 ปีที่แล้ว +256

    This was unfortunate timing with the new reveal stream happening right before this vid came out

    • @Bruh-el9js
      @Bruh-el9js 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      we've known the date of the reveal stream for a while so this is probably planned and he wants to review the cards in the stream on another video

    • @eddypark244
      @eddypark244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Poor dude

    • @literatemax
      @literatemax 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was intentional.

    • @MrAskmannen
      @MrAskmannen 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That horrendous reveal stream

  • @Wimikk
    @Wimikk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    “Fun for the arena. Won’t see play.”
    I thought so too, my dude. Now I weep when I see the trees.

  • @matthewpowell6271
    @matthewpowell6271 5 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I like how this dropped just after the reveal stream finished

  • @azerXP
    @azerXP 5 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    No one:
    Penniless: So here's this new system I'm working on for my reviews

    • @joppy9900
      @joppy9900 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Also Penniless:
      Here's why the system is too complex

  • @xAmNezZ
    @xAmNezZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    11:50
    I disagree, as you can always play a spell with it.

  • @Sliverappl
    @Sliverappl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    @8:00
    blizzard: hold my beer
    you thought rafaam scheme is bad? check out boom scheme!

  • @randomnobody660
    @randomnobody660 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Rafaam is a badass. So?
    Is rafaam's scheme bad? yes.
    is rafaam's scheme ass? yes.
    What's the problem?

  • @Matsudiro
    @Matsudiro 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know this is pretty old, but Nomi during the legion period of WoW was a pretty big part of Dalaran.

  • @sh0gun___
    @sh0gun___ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I think The Forest's Aid will be much better than most people are predicting. It's pricey, but it forces your opponent to trade/use board clear in order to get rid of the Treants for risk of you playing Treespeaker or whatever other Treant synergy cards are coming and having a board of 5/5s (with another Forest's Aid in hand).

    • @jogky2697
      @jogky2697 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It just makes treant druid viable and pretty damn good

    • @sh0gun___
      @sh0gun___ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jogky2697 Given how one-dimensional the new archetypes being pushed by this expansion seem to be I can only imagine we'll be getting new Treant support cards.

    • @pachiroth7848
      @pachiroth7848 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I highly agree, and infinite value is (almost) gone too, so it will MATTER that you summoned 10/10 in stats

    • @Noobie2k7
      @Noobie2k7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I mean considering a 5 mana summon 3 2/2's is seeing all of the play in Token Druid right now then an 8 mana summon 5 2/2's then get another one will more than likely definitely see play also. If 5 mana for 6/6 is good then 8 mana for 10/10 is also just as decent really.
      Plus if they use a big board clear to get rid of it you can just use it again forcing them to commit more to the board, since even if they have minions out they can't afford to not clear them, since there is aalways the threat of Savage Roar meaning you'll take 22+ to the face.

    • @solistus
      @solistus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I think it's a mistake to look at this as a tempo play that costs too much to be relevant. It's a *win condition*. Even without buffs, 5 2/2s is a big threat, and being able to buff big boards is pretty much a defining element of Druid's class identity at this point. The fact that you can cast it twice makes it far harder to deal with - your opponent needs to either have two board clears or enough of a board advantage to trade into TEN 2/2s over two turns.

  • @DaTruDreamers
    @DaTruDreamers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    6:14 can't believe you forgot Dr. Boom's Scheme

  • @joeyflint7232
    @joeyflint7232 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I AM THAT 1 PERCENT YOU WERE AIMING FOR WITH THE BAD HORSE CHORUS. THANK YOU

  • @xAmNezZ
    @xAmNezZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:58
    What if the imps become stronger too? 3 mana 7x7/7

    • @solistus
      @solistus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Then it would be a good card. But they don't, so it's probably not.

  • @aryanyekrangi7093
    @aryanyekrangi7093 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad you at least noticed the art work for omega devastartor... I was starting to think I was the only one...

  • @lucashurpia7474
    @lucashurpia7474 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    well, I usually agree with your points of view and ratings, but i think you undershot these cards. Remember that after the mammoth rotates out, the expansions that have not seen almost any play will now be the only ones available and in top of that we will have all these new cards. Its almost impossible to deem how the new meta will be or how relevant these new cards will be. But what we can do is look at each card and explore its raw power, because at this point anything is possible and as ''weak cards'' will now be played, remember that these new cards may look weak now but they have much potential.

  • @turtletoast3087
    @turtletoast3087 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy shit. I did not expect a bad horse reference in 2019. Much respect

  • @dra9onslayer
    @dra9onslayer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think a key thing you're missing with Forest's aid isnt its immediate potential, but what it means in tournament formats. With the introduction of specialist, some of the newer cards get a lot better as tech cards. In token druid, the forests aid requires your opponent to spend 2 board clears to deal with a single card, cause they dont know if you'll have any of the big board buffs that token druid uses to close out games. 5 2/2s arent threatening on their own, but with the threat of savage roar they absolutly are.

  • @bananamanhatguy1269
    @bananamanhatguy1269 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Next video will be reviewing the cards released today but 1 hour after the expansion is out xd

  • @Godspeeds
    @Godspeeds 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:53 why everybody forget Spirit of the Bat

    • @kroothound
      @kroothound 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me and my boi Hi'reek out here chilling just waiting for the right card to make the deck

  • @bisalissy3846
    @bisalissy3846 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think Kalecgos is one of the strongest cards. I dont think its as strong as Blooodreaver Gul'dan (Played in Zoo during KFT despite the 10 Mana cost), but I think it will be in every midrange and controll mage. It has the potential to give you the perfect card for the situration and the potential to give a Big Spell like Firestrike the Potential to not just clear the board but also set up a threat. And just like Ysera, Kalecgos is a thread.

  • @TerrarierBey
    @TerrarierBey 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have the new mechathun combo with priest. Mechathun + lazul's scheme + forbidden words. Idk if forbidden words work with 0 attack minions while having 0 mana, but it might work. You might say that u need to wait 10 turns with lazul's scheme in your hand, but you have a lot of low cost spells for priest so, like trump said, it could be miracle priest. Just put heals and grave horror and it might just work!

  • @jodagondrago8293
    @jodagondrago8293 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What some don't realize is that Kalecgos ISNT a 10 mana 4/12, it's a 10 mana 4/12 + any spell in your hand you want, OR one you discover (meaning free board/minion clear to go with him) + free spells so long as he lives. This guy is death stalker rexar levels of variability, CRAFT IT GOLDEN

  • @dasetwas1564
    @dasetwas1564 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The intro sold me.

  • @Rumu11
    @Rumu11 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think you’re underestimating kalecgos. It’s like a bigger ink master solia, but with better stats and you get to discover a spell. And a bonus if it survives.

  • @lior_shiboli
    @lior_shiboli 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    rewatching your videos because your review system is so good please come back

    • @lettucebob7395
      @lettucebob7395 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      His review system os terrible,even single card is "might see play,3 stars"

    • @lior_shiboli
      @lior_shiboli 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lettucebob7395 I...don't get your point

    • @lettucebob7395
      @lettucebob7395 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lior_shiboli He isn’t actually rating anything,he just saying "this might or might not be good" to every single card

  • @steffake7772
    @steffake7772 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hagatha's scheme will be a good replacement for volcano IMO. 5 mana but no Overload and the luck isn't in dealing the dmg to the right minions, but in drawing it soon enough.

  • @polyfoxgames9006
    @polyfoxgames9006 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video bro!

  • @philbuttler9119
    @philbuttler9119 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the honesty about liking and subscribing. Like you could have just been trying some of those tricks but you were just honest and that’s nice. I’ll like every video now.

  • @Passance
    @Passance 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    8 mana 10/10 draw a card is not bad if druid gets even one single ramp card in this expansion. Especially with savage roar as a threat. That is an 8 mana play that, if your opponent does not deal with it, can have 34 attack next turn.

  • @solistus
    @solistus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lazuli's Scheme is also a lot better than you're giving it credit for. It has incredibly strong synergy with a ton of basic/classic cards Priest already regularly plays, like Shadow Madness, Shadow Word Pain, and Cabal Shadow Priest. And has there *ever* been a zero cost spell in the history of Hearthstone that didn't see at least some competitive play? Miracle Priest could very well become a thing, depending on how the new meta shapes out.

  • @lukasschildt3631
    @lukasschildt3631 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Eyy nomi would of course be in this expansion based on lore, he is a chef in dalaran in a dalaran expansion.

  • @Gr1ff1n_
    @Gr1ff1n_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the Dr.Horrible shoutout

  • @dragonkingofthestars
    @dragonkingofthestars 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think you misjudge twinspell. It's a way to give high cost spells echo, an 6 drop with echo is meaningless ,but a six drop with twinspell works. ergo: twinspell should only got to high cost cards

  • @chrisjason7607
    @chrisjason7607 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wanted priest to be a dolaran class, but I’ll settle only because madam lazul might prevent me from falling into some cheap otk combo. Plus I get a hero card so I’ll be alright

  • @robertlupa8273
    @robertlupa8273 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:05 I KNEW I HEARD THIS SOMEWHERE!

  • @MrDirt
    @MrDirt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love it so much, whenever Dr Boom says: "Was?"

  • @micaelgarcia1576
    @micaelgarcia1576 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I disagree with improve morale; it is a card that leave damaged minions, which is warrior's thing...
    Wait, you did not understand - Forbidden words kills 4 attack minions for priest!

    • @yosh3301
      @yosh3301 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I understand his points but he is overlooking several interactions with these cards, like lazuls scheme and forbidden words making a mechathun deck if you draw it right.

    • @johnherb4243
      @johnherb4243 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yosh3301 yeah, I agree. For example, does he not get that Kalecgos gives you a free spell the turn you play him? His quick rating seemed to suggest such.

  • @dragonkingofthestars
    @dragonkingofthestars 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think the formula is a bit much Penniless, you already got the best rating system in the biz, a formula seems uneeded

    • @Zakens
      @Zakens 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dragonkingofthestars they're both hella extra and convoluted

    • @dragonkingofthestars
      @dragonkingofthestars 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Zakens nor really, the rating is enough I think, complex but fit's hearthstones various teirs of usefulness as is.

  • @jor2416
    @jor2416 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    8:34 voice crack

  • @solistus
    @solistus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're underestimating some of these cards - most notably Kalecgos, one of the most absurdly broken cards ever revealed. *It works on the turn it's played.* If you play it on a turn when you already planned to cast, say, Flamestrike, it's basically a 4/12 + discover a Mage spell for 3 mana that almost certainly wins you the game if it can't be removed immediately.

  • @MasterofMistakes
    @MasterofMistakes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Using the reveal stream as a test, I'm gonna hope aggro takes a step back and the
    control vs. control comes down to card generation, basically the league of explorers
    meta where it was along the lines of:
    Aggro vs. Control = did reno get drawn yes/no?
    Control vs. Control = who made the most cards and was able to use them well!

    • @jogky2697
      @jogky2697 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't wait for control or tempo bomb warrior

    • @theunderdog1359
      @theunderdog1359 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I just want less otk decks. Control and outvalue is fine but randomly saying you lose isn't fun

  • @WestSideWilliam
    @WestSideWilliam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Your new symbols are confusing and cluttered. Also, when you put A and E next to the symbols, I don't know what that means since they weren't explained. I was able to find out that A means anti, but I still don't know what E means.

    • @peteypariah6603
      @peteypariah6603 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. I stopped bothering trying to understand them; they don't fit well with the fast pace of the video.

    • @songbirdsandsandwiches8217
      @songbirdsandsandwiches8217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think E means that your opponent has cards that you want to prevent them using? Because the Spellward Jeweler prevents spells to the face and it had an E fireball as a requirement, so basically it requires your [E]nemy to have spells in their hand to push face with to be an effective counter? I agree it seems really silly though.

    • @cutecommie
      @cutecommie 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's part of his style. That's pretty clear by now.

  • @Pyronaut_
    @Pyronaut_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man I didn’t realize until this video how good of a voice clip that Boom “wat” was

  • @Petrico94
    @Petrico94 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the rent like in Dalaran?

  • @vaalsch4219
    @vaalsch4219 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Penniless, What are the Days that you make Streams ? Or Days that you Will Make Streams ?

  • @Minihood31770
    @Minihood31770 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like a minus sign "-" is clearer than an "A" for anti- something in your new cost/benefit equation visual thing.

  • @CapitalCrimez
    @CapitalCrimez 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does Twinspell need to be cheap? That’s the job of echo, as the card has to be played on the same turn. Twinspell is meant to give a decent effect without losing a card for one turn, giving you card advantage.

  • @water2770
    @water2770 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tbf with rogue now being able to have wonderous wand consistently makes it a lot easier for a malygos otk.

  • @Authoity4576
    @Authoity4576 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every villain is lemons

  • @steffake7772
    @steffake7772 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This feels like the best expansion in YEARS. None of that rastakhan bullshet or dumb ideas like in boomsday.

  • @LegendRed01
    @LegendRed01 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lets just hope we get new heros the After rise of shadows

  • @nabeelhussain1372
    @nabeelhussain1372 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:52 lul at not realizing Lazul's Scheme is the best card in the expansion

  • @keres-toramonline
    @keres-toramonline 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wrooong
    4/5 we seen kalecgos in play now, he’s even very good for anything

  • @megamonkey666
    @megamonkey666 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    togg's scheme is perfect in their new format will siding

  • @no-namesedits4825
    @no-namesedits4825 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:58 'Shadow Word P A I N'

  • @jkohler7996
    @jkohler7996 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad I'm not the only fan of Doctor Horrible

  • @michaelflatt4663
    @michaelflatt4663 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Algalon will be a legendary in the next expansion. Calling it now.

  • @aymonverheij1863
    @aymonverheij1863 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    rafaam is its own callback card

  • @notspeks
    @notspeks 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:00 "shadow word pAiN"

    • @xAmNezZ
      @xAmNezZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      10:09 yea

  • @immortalflame994
    @immortalflame994 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My hands are ready.

  • @danperalta8952
    @danperalta8952 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, have your like man who wants to live.

  • @joshreddy4359
    @joshreddy4359 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love ya penniless but man i want more videos xD

  • @rahuhe4102
    @rahuhe4102 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh god, Penniless, have you seen what they did with Dr. Boom's Scheme?

  • @lazadaisical8637
    @lazadaisical8637 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you maybe do some videos on MTGA? I know its an extremely expansive game, but id love to see you cover the meta and packs in standard.

  • @adind.5179
    @adind.5179 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep up the good content man :)

  • @tamro9701
    @tamro9701 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    wrong about how hagathas scheme needs card draw to be good. control does not care as much about a temporary dead draw as much as midrange or aggro does. second thing you are wrong about is rafam, its 1 card slot which is a superbly statted minion being taunt and 7/8 which will be an auto include in nearly every warlock deck except hyper aggro.

  • @Lilabrausedino
    @Lilabrausedino 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting idea, but i think your ratings lack considering:
    1. does this card give a wincondition
    2. has this cards mechanics this class can make a use off?
    3. you one sidedly took „card draw“ for default to take for schemes, while i think it is much more complicated, because you reach one point like 8 damage on hagatha, where you can probably play it any turn for a full clear. Still, as topdeck its a whirlwind, so the value is certainly much more than the carddraw synergy.

  • @blandersummer
    @blandersummer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ....and then forest aid is actually in a tier 2 deck

  • @niperwiper1
    @niperwiper1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aren't schemes worse for a combo deck in theory? While you're more focused on card draw in a combo deck, you're also focused on not using specific cards within your hand. So you need to be even heavier on card draw if you want to rely on a scheme for protection in a combo deck, otherwise you'll be dealing with more of what makes combo decks weak -- the fact that you can't play all the cards in your hand. Just imagine having combo pieces and a scheme in your hand. It seems pretty bad.

  • @hennigloo
    @hennigloo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You get a like just for the Dr. Horrible reference

  • @StillWeRide
    @StillWeRide 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subscribed..one of the best if not beat channels on TH-cam. Keep it up!

  • @ItsEVO
    @ItsEVO 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the bad horse

  • @Harry777
    @Harry777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Video starts at 1:34

  • @javs231
    @javs231 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Immediate like and subscribe for that Dr. Horrible reference 😂😂😂 Also the review system is A+

  • @l4nk0s39
    @l4nk0s39 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked and subscribed instantly

  • @v1298
    @v1298 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like your video and agree on most things, but disagree on the card ratings. For example, Kalecgos is 2 stars?

  • @defectivesickle5643
    @defectivesickle5643 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    RoS will be questionable. Year of the Dragon will be AWESOME seeing the changes.

  • @nickknight8692
    @nickknight8692 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Saw you were an editor for Tempostorm's Snapshot: Wild Meta. Good to see you have a side hussle bb.

  • @bisalissy3846
    @bisalissy3846 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would druid be without the useless "Summon Treants" card in every set... xD

  • @canaldecasta
    @canaldecasta 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hope they explain why an ethereal that likes treasures now can summon imps from the legion
    Also wtf is wrong with dr booms scheme

  • @BlueZombieBlood
    @BlueZombieBlood 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    OMG the Dr. Horrible reference. YES!

  • @Azrael_Rhinco
    @Azrael_Rhinco 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    YES! THANK YOU! EVIL LEAGUE OF EVIL!

  • @evwar5433
    @evwar5433 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Meh normally I don’t like/sub but hey. You’ve earned it

  • @Embara
    @Embara 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man the timing on these vids, still worth the wait for such quality tho :P #PennilessIsHuman

  • @felipeluz5035
    @felipeluz5035 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You show Forbidden Ritual, that saw play, and say Rafaam's Scheme is terrible? :v
    I don't think it's meta-breaking, but I see some potential for sure. xD
    I'd give it 2~3 stars, for now.
    Also, Blood to Ichor and Improve Morale are very similar, and Blood to Ichor saw play as well. It's a good Execute/Enrage enabler and could even receive more sinergies.
    I would give it 3 stars, for now.
    Also also, I have high hopes on Kalekgos and Big Spell Mage. It's effect starts on the turn it's played and, if it survives (which is not hard, based on it's stats) it can be used again and again. So at best it will make several spells cost 0 and be a presence on the board, and at worst it will make 1 spell cost 0 and make your opponent desperately try to kill it, probably wasting a whole turn doing so (since Big Spell Mage is known for not letting the opponent develop the board that well).
    I would give it 5 stars, for now.
    For the rest of the cards, I mostly agree.

    • @felipeluz5035
      @felipeluz5035 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, I haven't seen the new cards from the reveal stream yet. So I have the same knowledge as Penniless on this one while commenting this. :P

  • @substndard
    @substndard 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You way to up on madame lazul. I think shes good dont get me wrong but priest I feel doesn't fit in. One thing I do wanna see though is that a warrior deck with bomb synergies

  • @gliido
    @gliido 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    And you thought Rafaam's scheme was bad... LOL

  • @juanmarailgun7783
    @juanmarailgun7783 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, Dr. Boom was warrior. Too bad you couldn't wait one more hour to add that post-script tidbit XD

  • @awapowell
    @awapowell 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is going to be a primary source of income for you? I just head “more videos coming” and I’M DOWN FOR THAT. Good for you dude, good for you.

  • @blandersummer
    @blandersummer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dammmmmmnnnnnnnnnnn blizzard got shamed by penniless he’s done for

  • @stefanmekkinosson175
    @stefanmekkinosson175 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked and subscribed. So you wouldn't go penniless :)

  • @mynameisjeff7509
    @mynameisjeff7509 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think you underrated lazuli scheme but ok..

  • @duelponzac
    @duelponzac 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i say forbidden word is a very good designed spell. if you want ot destroy a powerfull big boss guy, you most certanly should spend as much mana as its own cost. when you have 3-4 mana spells like hex/poly and shadoword death that rips off 8-10 mana big guys.... you are most certainly kidding me; not only you are dealing with him, but you are also alowered to play something else....
    lets not even forget how powerfull those cards are arena-wise.

  • @GambolVanguard
    @GambolVanguard 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pennyless, I love your videos, but your new animation math thing is extremely confusing. I would scrap or seriously change it.

  • @Southseapirate
    @Southseapirate 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You need better thumbnails. I love your videos but I glossed over the video like 3 times when scrolling through my subscriptions.
    Love your videos!

  • @zawarrudo3930
    @zawarrudo3930 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hero cards and Baku and Genn THE GREATEST CHANGE EVER AND I LOVE IT

  • @pluszowyskurwiel
    @pluszowyskurwiel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How unfair, some classes already have a hero power upgrade , which are hero cards, and others will not receive it for at least FOUR MONTHS :c
    Cutting warlock , mage , priest and druid out of control playstyle is just extremely disappointing.

    • @pachiroth7848
      @pachiroth7848 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But hopefully those classes get cards good enough to make up that difference in value

    • @pluszowyskurwiel
      @pluszowyskurwiel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pachiroth7848 How strong would those cards need to be to balance the fact that Dr. Boom is able to blast you for 3 or gain 7 HP , while warlock's effect is negative in the late game?

    • @pachiroth7848
      @pachiroth7848 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pluszowyskurwiel warlock is getting an aggro push with rafaam as the final value attempt, hence doomguard rotation so its not a staple

    • @pachiroth7848
      @pachiroth7848 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pluszowyskurwiel also Lazul OP snipe the hero cards EZ game

  • @nikospyridis9579
    @nikospyridis9579 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Penniless predicted Rafaam correctly, all hail our God.

    • @WifeyClayMakes
      @WifeyClayMakes 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well he predicted it after thousands of people did

  • @GoldGalaxianFin
    @GoldGalaxianFin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    *Is confused* What?

  • @doublechindoge7
    @doublechindoge7 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually didn't realise I hadn't subscribed to this channel yet... Never had that before, and I've subscribed to almost 600... Then again that number may be the very reason I thought I'd already subbed.

  • @kroen
    @kroen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Kalecgos 2 stars? lol, be prepared to make a video about cards you misrated.

    • @jogky2697
      @jogky2697 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's pretty garbage since your opponent will most likely use their removal on it and especialy if it's popular keep the removal for it. 10 mana force your opponent to play a removal card and cast a spell for free sucks honestly

    • @phelanglick794
      @phelanglick794 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jogky2697So just a few things to consider. One is that you can play a spell and the Kalecgos on same turn. You will get at least one spell for free (Just one free spell alone is good) PLUS you get another spell that you discover (Unlike most of the time you would chose cheap cards, but because you get them for free now chose any spell that's expensive cause who cares what it costs). Perhaps I missed something that will make it unplayable, but as far as I know Mage has big spells that are staying in rotation.
      I agree, your opponent WILL remove this card. You will almost never see this card two turns in a row (especially in mage cause mage will not have board presence). BUT IN ONE TURN this card can make a huge splash. Or maybe I'm wrong.

    • @xAmNezZ
      @xAmNezZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jogky2697 you obviously only ever reached rank 15.