Good thought provoking discussion. Excellent (rare to journalism) nuance/consideration of tradeoffs! Not sure, ...have to think about it more, ...but (perhaps?) overly shallow/rambling/unfocused, and (maybe?) in need of at least some attempt at tradeoff comparisons/framing of data. Good on the hosts to address these at least somewhat in the wrap. Then again, maybe a wide ranging, shallow, but broad context (to stress again - kudos on that) set of data w/out any comparative evaluation is optimal groundwork for any listener willing to do the work of researching deeper, and thinking for themselves.
Thanks for the interview, always interested to hear Peter's thoughts and opinions. Big fan of his.
Good thought provoking discussion. Excellent (rare to journalism) nuance/consideration of tradeoffs! Not sure, ...have to think about it more, ...but (perhaps?) overly shallow/rambling/unfocused, and (maybe?) in need of at least some attempt at tradeoff comparisons/framing of data. Good on the hosts to address these at least somewhat in the wrap. Then again, maybe a wide ranging, shallow, but broad context (to stress again - kudos on that) set of data w/out any comparative evaluation is optimal groundwork for any listener willing to do the work of researching deeper, and thinking for themselves.