Salam brother how can I contact you. I want to email you over a research paper in English that a student of knowledge has put together with all sahih Hadith on the matter you spoke about. His research is truly amazing. You’re the only English speaker from Ahlus Sunnah to have talked about these points that I know of.
@@yusufchoudhury2959 someone that formented a rebellion against the rightful Khalifah Ali was the best king ? Are you serious! Allah is the only King .
Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."
To your point of scholars hesitation to narrate the full picture….the risk of forever hatred between Sunni and Shia should outweigh the risk Sunnis becoming Shia. This will encourage love, empathy and understanding toward the Shia which can heal centuries of hatred fomented by ignorance and misunderstanding
MashaAllah akhi speaking the truth is difficult. I was always told to look at this issue with a specific lense, and if We said certain truths it would give the Shia one point up, for me I don’t care what the Shia think or want or make much of their aqeedah imamah etc. However I do know why they feel the way they do and blame Sunnis for being the “children” of Yazid Because Sunnis scholarship on mass have always tried to cover things up.(apart from some brave ones) I just want to know the truth. One of the reasons for Shia’sm to prosper so much hatred and then it spills on to the khulafa rashideen is because we haven’t as Sunnis accepted some truth’s in our sahih Hadith. We want to cover them up and brush them under the carpet. There are ample Hadith that show the cruelty of Banu umayah and imam Albani as well as muhaditheen have graded them sahih. We hide the facts that Ahlul bayt were persecuted and we are scared to talk about them lest we be labelled Shia. Imam Nisai and many scholars were also killed because of his stance on this matter. No one talks about 1/ The agreement between Muawiyyah and Hussain and each one of them were broken except giving khums which was ordained in the Quran. 2/ The innovation and sunnah of the Romans of selecting ones son as a ruler that got the other sahaba’s to resist this change 3/ The cursing of Ali on the mimbars by the ummayads. 4/ The cruelty and force used to take bayah of Yazid. I’ve read about these points and your the first one to speak the truth. As a Sunni I used to be scared to talk about Ali, Hassan and Hussain because that’s the job of the Shia…. Well not anymore, I follow the sahih Hadith. And by the way the muhaditheen have use AS for Ali, Hassan Hussain and Faitima. It doesn’t mean they are infallible like the Shia claim.
Brother your right but arguing about those things isn't the important thing we cannot change the history but we have a lesson to learn Hussain Rali's martyr is done for that, he was the mark Allah subahanawthala has left us to learn. That starting of kingship is still on going in this Ummah. We have to realise that Allah doesn't like it don't allow anyone to be a king. We should understand the politics Islam speaking and unite our Ummah get us a Amir a khalifa of Allah subahanawthala in the earth insha'Allah...
@@mihsan8341arguing about those things IS important, lest the wrongful information will continue to be framed as the official Sunni position. This particular point of Muslim history needs to be highlighted and resolved. I daresay it is even ordained by Allah (Azzawajal) was He ordered us to hold onto the rope of Islam and not split into sects. Narrowing the gap between Sunni and Shia parties is a huge undertaking that will take centuries. We better start now so at least the children of our children of our children will play in one United Ummah. Until then, what's the point of discussing some fictitious Amir or Khalifate if we cannot even mend relationship with our fellow Muslims because of some ancient rulers ego or greed?
@ yes that’s the whole point, I think if we acknowledge the truth, many of the brothers who have gone on the wrong path will come to the truth and stop disrespecting the khulefa Rashideen. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. If they see us as the killers and supporters of the Ahlul bayt they will never come to the truth.
Barakallahu feekum brother its beautiful to know this history as painful as it is. The truth must be spoken. I think sunnis have a right to Ahlul Bayt more than the Shia because Ahlul Bayt ARE the sunnah, period. The Shia have a plethora of problems which have nothing to do with their so called love for Ahlul Bayt.
Salam brother, I know it is a controversial topic even for you, but can you make a video on the events that transpired after the death of the Prophet S.A.W like the succession, and the claims made by different sects.
Shariah law based on the Quaraan Sharif Obey those in authority over you. Muawiya didn’t do that and therefore according to the laws of Islam was wrong
This discussion is effectively over my pay grade. This whole event seems to be a test of peoples understanding of Qadr. All this was preordained. The Shia and those who pick sides may not see the greater test in this. It’s not about who was right but are you willing to accept the Qadr of Allah swt. At the end Allah swt wrote these events to happen. There’s no avoiding Qadr no matter what. This might what Umar ibn Abdullaziz RH might have been pointing to when he was asked about these events.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: What is proven in Saheeh al-Bukhaari is that the head of al-Husayn was brought and placed in front of ‘Ubaydullah ibn Ziyaad, who started poking at the teeth with a stick in the presence of Anas ibn Maalik. In al-Musnad it says that this happened in the presence of Abu Barzah al-Aslami. But some people narrated with an interrupted isnaad that this poking of the teeth happened in the presence of Yazeed ibn Mu‘aawiyah. This is false. End quote. Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (27/469) He also said: Yazeed ibn Mu‘aawiyah was in Syria, and was not in Iraq at the time of the killing of al-Husayn. Whoever narrated that he poked his teeth with a stick in the presence of Anas and Abu Barzah, in front of Yazeed, is definitely lying, and his lie is well known on the basis of mutawaatir reports. End quote. Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (27/4 70)
Abu Makhnaf’s full name is Loot ibn Yahya. Adh-Dhahabi said: He is a worthless narrator of stories; he is not to be trusted; he was ignored by Abu Haatim and others. Ad-Daaraqutni said: He is weak. Ibn Ma‘een said: He is not trustworthy. And he said, on one occasion: He is nothing. Ibn ‘Adiyy said: He is a fanatical Shi‘i, a narrator of their reports. Mizaan al-I‘tidaal
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Hence the view of those who follow the beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah and the leading scholars of the ummah is that he is not to be reviled or loved. Saalih ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: I said to my father: Some people say that they love Yazeed. He said: O my son, would anyone who believes in Allah and the Last Day love Yazeed? I said: O my father, why do we not curse him? He said: O my son, when did you ever see your father curse anyone? End quote. Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (3/4 12)
Here is what I think of muawiyah when his name comes up as my research of his history that has a mark in Allahh's words without remix,but .All right, so the Quran used the words or the description barely comprehend Quranic speech to describe the Ghassanid tribes. Why is that? And we have to understand that that same region, those tribes became the incubators of the Umayyad dynasty. In other words, when Muawiyah the companion who grabbed power from Ali bin Abi Taleb he moved the capital from Madinah to Damascus. Damascus is in this area of the group of people who can barely comprehend. So for about 95 years the Muslim heritage was in the hands of a group of people who can barely comprehend scriptural texts. Please pay attention. For about 95 years, which means three generations, they had free hand in manipulating and creating whatever understanding they wanted into the text, into the Quran. Why do you think the concept of the first three generations they insisted on this?
as salaam alykum wa rahmat Allaah(swt) Glad I stumbled upon your channel, alhamdo li Allaah(swt)! May Allaah(swt) protect you from all misguidance and allow us to benefit from you - ameen!
There is no democracy in Islam. What's there is a council, a board that votes for a leader. But since the Ummah has been split, and the Prophet (Peace be upon him) has acknowledged this based on his advice, we hear and obey the ruler in all that is Halal, and we disobey the ruler if he commands haram.
@@spawnnpwn4166 based on that premise how can anyone support Muawiya when he rebelled against the rightful Khalifah Ali one of the four tightly guided Caliphs!
@@spawnnpwn4166 Islam has a better democracy than the world right know, because it's from Allah subahanawthala, who knows us better than our creator. Actually Islam is what has real democracy. But until this Ummah realise it we would be humiliated by Allah as he says In the Qur'an to Bani Israel. To the people who have only taken parts of the Deen and rejects other parts, Allah will heap Humiliation on them. That's what's happening to Muslims today. We should do thawba and seek refuge and stand for what's right
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy. 2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA 12 years of Uthman RA 5 years and 6 months of Ali RA 6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@HamzaKhan-ue7ii Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Never Claimed Himself As A Caliph But Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] Claimed Himself As A Caliph After Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] Passed Away And The Entire Muslim World Accepted It After The Prophecy Took Place Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Becomes The One Who Unites Two Muslim Forces With Peace And Ending The First Fitna So Those 6 Months Of Khilafah Goes In Favour Of Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] And That's How He Is The 5th Caliph And The First King Abu Bakr Siddique [Radi Allah Anhu] - 2 years Umar ibn Al Khattab [Radi Allah Anhu] - 10 years Usman Ibn Affan [Radi Allah Anhu] - 12 years Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] - 5 years And 6 Months Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] - 6 Months Of Khilafah And Then The Divine Kingship
Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Never Claimed Himself As A Caliph But Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] Claimed Himself As A Caliph After Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] Passed Away And The Entire Muslim World Accepted It After The Prophecy Took Place Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Becomes The One Who Unites Two Muslim Forces With Peace And Ending The First Fitna So Those 6 Months Of Khilafah Goes In Favour Of Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] And That's How He Is The 5th Caliph And The First King Abu Bakr Siddique [Radi Allah Anhu] - 2 years Umar ibn Al Khattab [Radi Allah Anhu] - 10 years Usman Ibn Affan [Radi Allah Anhu] - 12 years Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] - 5 years And 6 Months Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] - 6 Months Of Khilafah And Then The Divine Kingship @@HamzaKhan-ue7ii
Muawiyah RA has nothing to do with the poisoning of Al Hasan RA as the narrations are weak unreliable and false It’s written and speculated but the reports fall apart as soon as the science of Hadith is applied to A lot of lies propaganda false accusations were written on the era of first Muslim Civil war with the effects still felt today and the Ummah split to three groups Sunnah Shia Khawarij The scholars in particular warned about going deep into these issues especially by layman and the methodology of historians was to collect the reports no matter the source and record them as Akhbar many which are false disparaging unreliable unlike the Hadith methodology where more scrutiny was applied The Shia propped up many false propaganda for Ahl Bayt RA and false reports on the Sahaba to gain credibility for their sect
@@allysoobratty7565 why would he? muawiya was content with the agreement he made with hassan, the shia of ali were the people who were angry with hassan and insulting him, they are the first suspect
@@bankreas3523 indeed, it doesn't make sense for Muawiyah to do something like this and create chaos again while everything was peaceful. I also think it's the so called shiatu'ali who were angry and its very plausible they did this so they can make Muawiyah suspicious and use this as a ground and reason to start a new rebellion against Muawiyah.
So after he died he didnt return the Caliphate to Hassan but put his bastard as Caliph who ordered the killing of Hussayn in Karbala or is this false also???
First King of Islam and the Best one and a Caliph The best governor of Al Sham no doubt and Ahl Sham were loyal to him more than the Ahl Iraq were “loyal” to Rashidun Caliph Ali Ibn Abi Talib RA People of Al Sham were are and will always be better than People of Iraq
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy. 2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA 12 years of Uthman RA 5 years and 6 months of Ali RA 6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@MohamedAbdullahi-vd9iz Caliph Ali Ibn Abi Talib RA was a caliph and from the Rashidun Not a blessed reign but his rule gave us the Ahkaam to deal with the Khawarij and those who rebelled Once an Iraqi asked Abu Turab RA “ Why in the reigns of Abu Bakr and Omar we have peace unity and prosperity while in your reign strife division and turmoil ?” The Caliph answered “Abu Bakr RA and Umar RA ruled upon people like me thus no problems But now I rule people like you thus you see what you see !!!” I praise the first 4 Caliphs and Al Hasan RA along with the Ummayeds being the best kings+ caliphs Ali RA was tested by an evil region untrustworthy people and unreliable troops hence why did the Khawarij and Rawafid emerge from Iraq not Al Sham ???? Kufah was the problem Ahl Iraq was the problem The murderers of Uthman RA in Ali RA camp were the problem Three combos bad results Ibn Muljim the assassin was from the camp of Ali RA Why don’t we see division turmoil sectarianism and splits in Muawiyah RA camp When it comes to Iraq I’m a Nasibi not to Banu Hashem although Banu Ummaya were better rulers !!!
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy. 2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA 12 years of Uthman RA 5 years and 6 months of Ali RA 6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@HamzaKhan-ue7ii The khilafa of Muawiyah was very peaceful. Sahih al-Bukhari 2704 Narrated Al-Hasan Al-Basri: By Allah, Al-Hasan bin `Ali led large battalions like mountains against Muawiya. `Amr bin Al-As said (to Muawiya), "I surely see battalions which will not turn back before killing their opponents." Muawiya who was really the best of the two men said to him, "O `Amr! If these killed those and those killed these, who would be left with me for the jobs of the public, who would be left with me for their women, who would be left with me for their children?" Then Muawiya sent two Quraishi men from the tribe of `Abd-i-Shams called `Abdur Rahman bin Sumura and `Abdullah bin 'Amir bin Kuraiz to Al-Hasan saying to them, "Go to this man (i.e. Al-Hasan) and negotiate peace with him and talk and appeal to him." So, they went to Al-Hasan and talked and appealed to him to accept peace. Al-Hasan said, "We, the offspring of `Abdul Muttalib, have got wealth and people have indulged in killing and corruption (and money only will appease them)." They said to Al-Hasan, "Muawiya offers you so and so, and appeals to you and entreats you to accept peace." Al-Hasan said to them, "But who will be responsible for what you have said?" They said, "We will be responsible for it." So, whatever Al- Hasan asked they said, "We will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Muawiya. Al-Hasan (Al-Basri) said: I heard Abu Bakr saying, "I saw Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on the pulpit and Al-Hasan bin `Ali was by his side. The Prophet (ﷺ) was looking once at the people and once at Al-Hasan bin `Ali saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him."
@@spawnnpwn4166 I agree it was peaceful and prosperous in a worldly sence. But that doesnt make it a Khilafah. Im not about to clash with the words of RasoolAllah PBUH to make you happy. RasoolAllah PBUH said that after 30 years the Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet PPUH followed by Bitting/tyranical monarchy.
The first Caliph after Muhammad SAW, was Abu Bakr As-Siddiq. And it ended with Ali ibn' Abi Talib. The first king started with Muawiyah RA of the Umayyad dynasty, and ended with Sultan Mehmed V Resyad of the Ottoman dynasty.
I disagree with the statement , Since the Muslim brotherhood in my viewpoint is disfunctional without the Caliph , And the Ottomans Caliphate , and it's predecessors managed to Unite the Muslims , The Caliph system was abolished by Attaturk , May It be reestablished again. Ameen
@@sultan__8636 Im sorry but your view is doesnt align with what RasoolAllah PBUH said. RasoolAllah PBUH said to the nearest effect that Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet Will last only 30 years and aftwr there will be a tyranical/Bitting Monarchy and after that there will be a enslaving/forceful monarchy and then the Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet Will return. I understand that the monarchs that came after the Caliphate did unite and protect Muslims, but that doesnt mean they qualify as a Calipahte. The Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet PPUH: 2 years of Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA 12 years of Uthman RA 5 years and 6 mounths of Ali RA 6 mounths of Hasan RA
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘𝐔𝐍 ➤ www.historyun.com/
Ameer Muawiya (RA). The best king sahabi. Lot of conquests and stability in his 40 years (20 as caliph)
Salam brother how can I contact you.
I want to email you over a research paper in English that a student of knowledge has put together with all sahih Hadith on the matter you spoke about.
His research is truly amazing.
You’re the only English speaker from Ahlus Sunnah to have talked about these points that I know of.
@@yasararif8292 what points in specific akhi
All points really
@@yusufchoudhury2959 someone that formented a rebellion against the rightful Khalifah Ali was the best king ? Are you serious! Allah is the only King .
Narrated `Ikrima:
that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them.
When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time.
The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."
To your point of scholars hesitation to narrate the full picture….the risk of forever hatred between Sunni and Shia should outweigh the risk Sunnis becoming Shia. This will encourage love, empathy and understanding toward the Shia which can heal centuries of hatred fomented by ignorance and misunderstanding
lol lmao, have you read what twelver shias believe in their books??
@ The author of this video made the political and theological distinctions clear. Maybe give it another watch
@@crazyfrogduo12 magical people 😂😂😂. Are above other prophets peace be upon them all.
One of my new fave channels, Allahuma Barik
MashaAllah akhi speaking the truth is difficult.
I was always told to look at this issue with a specific lense, and if We said certain truths it would give the Shia one point up, for me I don’t care what the Shia think or want or make much of their aqeedah imamah etc.
However I do know why they feel the way they do and blame Sunnis for being the “children” of Yazid
Because Sunnis scholarship on mass have always tried to cover things up.(apart from some brave ones)
I just want to know the truth.
One of the reasons for Shia’sm to prosper so much hatred and then it spills on to the khulafa rashideen is because we haven’t as Sunnis accepted some truth’s in our sahih Hadith. We want to cover them up and brush them under the carpet.
There are ample Hadith that show the cruelty of Banu umayah and imam Albani as well as muhaditheen have graded them sahih.
We hide the facts that Ahlul bayt were persecuted and we are scared to talk about them lest we be labelled Shia.
Imam Nisai and many scholars were also killed because of his stance on this matter.
No one talks about
1/ The agreement between Muawiyyah and Hussain and each one of them were broken except giving khums which was ordained in the Quran.
2/ The innovation and sunnah of the Romans of selecting ones son as a ruler that got the other sahaba’s to resist this change
3/ The cursing of Ali on the mimbars by the ummayads.
4/ The cruelty and force used to take bayah of Yazid.
I’ve read about these points and your the first one to speak the truth.
As a Sunni I used to be scared to talk about Ali, Hassan and Hussain because that’s the job of the Shia….
Well not anymore, I follow the sahih Hadith.
And by the way the muhaditheen have use AS for Ali, Hassan Hussain and Faitima.
It doesn’t mean they are infallible like the Shia claim.
Brother your right but arguing about those things isn't the important thing we cannot change the history but we have a lesson to learn Hussain Rali's martyr is done for that, he was the mark Allah subahanawthala has left us to learn. That starting of kingship is still on going in this Ummah. We have to realise that Allah doesn't like it don't allow anyone to be a king. We should understand the politics Islam speaking and unite our Ummah get us a Amir a khalifa of Allah subahanawthala in the earth insha'Allah...
@@mihsan8341arguing about those things IS important, lest the wrongful information will continue to be framed as the official Sunni position. This particular point of Muslim history needs to be highlighted and resolved. I daresay it is even ordained by Allah (Azzawajal) was He ordered us to hold onto the rope of Islam and not split into sects. Narrowing the gap between Sunni and Shia parties is a huge undertaking that will take centuries. We better start now so at least the children of our children of our children will play in one United Ummah. Until then, what's the point of discussing some fictitious Amir or Khalifate if we cannot even mend relationship with our fellow Muslims because of some ancient rulers ego or greed?
@ yes that’s the whole point, I think if we acknowledge the truth, many of the brothers who have gone on the wrong path will come to the truth and stop disrespecting the khulefa Rashideen.
I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
If they see us as the killers and supporters of the Ahlul bayt they will never come to the truth.
Muhammed ibn Abi bakr died before Muawiya choose Yazid.
The son who was alive was Abdarrahman.
I am so glad your channel exists. MashaAllah brother. May Allah give you barakah in your work and much more exposure. Ameen.
Ameen 🙏🏽. Barakallahu Feekum
Barakallahu feekum brother its beautiful to know this history as painful as it is. The truth must be spoken. I think sunnis have a right to Ahlul Bayt more than the Shia because Ahlul Bayt ARE the sunnah, period. The Shia have a plethora of problems which have nothing to do with their so called love for Ahlul Bayt.
Salam brother, I know it is a controversial topic even for you, but can you make a video on the events that transpired after the death of the Prophet S.A.W like the succession, and the claims made by different sects.
Thank you for another video. Wallahi you are a gem for this ummah. May Allah bless u and give you more knowledge to share inshallah
Shariah law based on the Quaraan Sharif Obey those in authority over you.
Muawiya didn’t do that and therefore according to the laws of Islam was wrong
Assalam alaykum. I went on hustoryun website and it said connection not private. There is an issue with the website. Can't sign up as a member bro
Wa Aleikum Salam
Please use the specific link 🔗 provided in the description box or in the pinned comment
This discussion is effectively over my pay grade. This whole event seems to be a test of peoples understanding of Qadr. All this was preordained. The Shia and those who pick sides may not see the greater test in this. It’s not about who was right but are you willing to accept the Qadr of Allah swt.
At the end Allah swt wrote these events to happen. There’s no avoiding Qadr no matter what. This might what Umar ibn Abdullaziz RH might have been pointing to when he was asked about these events.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
What is proven in Saheeh al-Bukhaari is that the head of al-Husayn was brought and placed in front of ‘Ubaydullah ibn Ziyaad, who started poking at the teeth with a stick in the presence of Anas ibn Maalik.
In al-Musnad it says that this happened in the presence of Abu Barzah al-Aslami.
But some people narrated with an interrupted isnaad that this poking of the teeth happened in the presence of Yazeed ibn Mu‘aawiyah. This is false. End quote.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (27/469)
He also said:
Yazeed ibn Mu‘aawiyah was in Syria, and was not in Iraq at the time of the killing of al-Husayn. Whoever narrated that he poked his teeth with a stick in the presence of Anas and Abu Barzah, in front of Yazeed, is definitely lying, and his lie is well known on the basis of mutawaatir reports. End quote.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (27/4 70)
Abu Makhnaf’s full name is Loot ibn Yahya. Adh-Dhahabi said: He is a worthless narrator of stories; he is not to be trusted; he was ignored by Abu Haatim and others. Ad-Daaraqutni said: He is weak. Ibn Ma‘een said: He is not trustworthy. And he said, on one occasion: He is nothing. Ibn ‘Adiyy said: He is a fanatical Shi‘i, a narrator of their reports.
Mizaan al-I‘tidaal
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Hence the view of those who follow the beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah and the leading scholars of the ummah is that he is not to be reviled or loved. Saalih ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: I said to my father: Some people say that they love Yazeed. He said: O my son, would anyone who believes in Allah and the Last Day love Yazeed?
I said: O my father, why do we not curse him? He said: O my son, when did you ever see your father curse anyone? End quote.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (3/4 12)
Jazakallahu khairan
Better organisation science implications can still solve Ummah, I have an intro to it in my channel
It's necessary to know Islamic history and to be firm on the sound Aqeeda so not to fall into sectarianism by Tribalism, Politics, or Fiqh.
keep up the content my bro
Here is what I think of muawiyah when his name comes up as my research of his history that has a mark in Allahh's words without remix,but .All right, so the Quran used the words or the description barely comprehend Quranic speech to describe the
Ghassanid tribes. Why is that? And we have to understand that that same region, those tribes became the
incubators of the Umayyad dynasty. In other words, when Muawiyah the companion who grabbed power from
Ali bin Abi Taleb he moved the capital from Madinah to Damascus. Damascus is in this area of the group of
people who can barely comprehend. So for about 95 years the Muslim heritage was in the hands of a group of
people who can barely comprehend scriptural texts. Please pay attention. For about 95 years, which means
three generations, they had free hand in manipulating and creating whatever understanding they wanted into
the text, into the Quran. Why do you think the concept of the first three generations they insisted on this?
typo in the thumbnail akhi
50:32 i am crying from this statement of Abdullah ibn umair,
as salaam alykum wa rahmat Allaah(swt)
Glad I stumbled upon your channel, alhamdo li Allaah(swt)!
May Allaah(swt) protect you from all misguidance and allow us to benefit from you - ameen!
Wa Aleikum Salam. Ameen and JazakallAhu Khayran, may Allah preserve you
King
To be honest I will prefer democracy caliph than monarchy
Both shirk
There is no democracy in Islam. What's there is a council, a board that votes for a leader. But since the Ummah has been split, and the Prophet (Peace be upon him) has acknowledged this based on his advice, we hear and obey the ruler in all that is Halal, and we disobey the ruler if he commands haram.
@@spawnnpwn4166 based on that premise how can anyone support Muawiya when he rebelled against the rightful Khalifah Ali one of the four tightly guided Caliphs!
@@spawnnpwn4166 Islam has a better democracy than the world right know, because it's from Allah subahanawthala, who knows us better than our creator. Actually Islam is what has real democracy. But until this Ummah realise it we would be humiliated by Allah as he says In the Qur'an to Bani Israel. To the people who have only taken parts of the Deen and rejects other parts, Allah will heap Humiliation on them. That's what's happening to Muslims today. We should do thawba and seek refuge and stand for what's right
The ending of the video blew me subhanallah
He was both
Nope
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy.
2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA
12 years of Uthman RA
5 years and 6 months of Ali RA
6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@HamzaKhan-ue7ii Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Never Claimed Himself As A Caliph But Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] Claimed Himself As A Caliph After Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] Passed Away And The Entire Muslim World Accepted It After The Prophecy Took Place Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Becomes The One Who Unites Two Muslim Forces With Peace And Ending The First Fitna So Those 6 Months Of Khilafah Goes In Favour Of Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu]
And That's How He Is The 5th Caliph And The First King
Abu Bakr Siddique [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 2 years
Umar ibn Al Khattab [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 10 years
Usman Ibn Affan [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 12 years
Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 5 years And 6 Months
Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 6 Months Of Khilafah And Then The Divine Kingship
Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Never Claimed Himself As A Caliph But Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu] Claimed Himself As A Caliph After Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu] Passed Away And The Entire Muslim World Accepted It After The Prophecy Took Place Hasan Ibn Ali [Radi Allah Anhu] Becomes The One Who Unites Two Muslim Forces With Peace And Ending The First Fitna So Those 6 Months Of Khilafah Goes In Favour Of Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu]
And That's How He Is The 5th Caliph And The First King
Abu Bakr Siddique [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 2 years
Umar ibn Al Khattab [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 10 years
Usman Ibn Affan [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 12 years
Ali Ibn Abu Talib [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 5 years And 6 Months
Muawiyah Ibn Abu Sufiyan [Radi Allah Anhu]
- 6 Months Of Khilafah And Then The Divine Kingship @@HamzaKhan-ue7ii
He poisoned Imam Hassan indirectly
Muawiyah RA has nothing to do with the poisoning of Al Hasan RA as the narrations are weak unreliable and false
It’s written and speculated but the reports fall apart as soon as the science of Hadith is applied to
A lot of lies propaganda false accusations were written on the era of first Muslim Civil war with the effects still felt today and the Ummah split to three groups
Sunnah
Shia
Khawarij
The scholars in particular warned about going deep into these issues especially by layman and the methodology of historians was to collect the reports no matter the source and record them as Akhbar many which are false disparaging unreliable unlike the Hadith methodology where more scrutiny was applied
The Shia propped up many false propaganda for Ahl Bayt RA and false reports on the Sahaba to gain credibility for their sect
Baseless. Only shias think that
@@allysoobratty7565 why would he? muawiya was content with the agreement he made with hassan, the shia of ali were the people who were angry with hassan and insulting him, they are the first suspect
@@bankreas3523 indeed, it doesn't make sense for Muawiyah to do something like this and create chaos again while everything was peaceful. I also think it's the so called shiatu'ali who were angry and its very plausible they did this so they can make Muawiyah suspicious and use this as a ground and reason to start a new rebellion against Muawiyah.
So after he died he didnt return the Caliphate to Hassan but put his bastard as Caliph who ordered the killing of Hussayn in Karbala or is this false also???
First King of Islam and the Best one and a Caliph
The best governor of Al Sham no doubt and Ahl Sham were loyal to him more than the Ahl Iraq were “loyal” to Rashidun Caliph Ali Ibn Abi Talib RA
People of Al Sham were are and will always be better than People of Iraq
Ali was not caliph mauyah is one 12 caliphs
Allah is appointed by the killers of uthman binu caafan
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy.
2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA
12 years of Uthman RA
5 years and 6 months of Ali RA
6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@HamzaKhan-ue7ii
The Rashidun are as you mentioned
But the Caliphate continued as kingship from the Ummayeds
@@MohamedAbdullahi-vd9iz
Caliph Ali Ibn Abi Talib RA was a caliph and from the Rashidun
Not a blessed reign but his rule gave us the Ahkaam to deal with the Khawarij and those who rebelled
Once an Iraqi asked Abu Turab RA
“ Why in the reigns of Abu Bakr and Omar we have peace unity and prosperity while in your reign strife division and turmoil ?”
The Caliph answered
“Abu Bakr RA and Umar RA ruled upon people like me thus no problems
But now I rule people like you thus you see what you see !!!”
I praise the first 4 Caliphs and Al Hasan RA along with the Ummayeds being the best kings+ caliphs
Ali RA was tested by an evil region untrustworthy people and unreliable troops hence why did the Khawarij and Rawafid emerge from Iraq not Al Sham ????
Kufah was the problem
Ahl Iraq was the problem
The murderers of Uthman RA in Ali RA camp were the problem
Three combos bad results
Ibn Muljim the assassin was from the camp of Ali RA
Why don’t we see division turmoil sectarianism and splits in Muawiyah RA camp
When it comes to Iraq I’m a Nasibi not to Banu Hashem although Banu Ummaya were better rulers !!!
when I think of muawiya (RA), i think of a highly ambitious sahabi, which is great when it comes to ummah building and progress.
syednah muawiyah was a great and true caliph
Yes Indeed, anyone excommunicating the Sahaba, whether it is Abu Bakr, Ayesha or Muawiyah رضي الله عنهم, have excommunicated themselves from Islam.
Yes He Ra was the first Malik but not a Caliph. RasoolAllah PBUH said Caliphate on the way of the Prophet will end after 30 years and will be followed by a bitting/tyrannical monarchy.
2 years Abu Bakr RA 10 years of Umar RA
12 years of Uthman RA
5 years and 6 months of Ali RA
6 mounths of Hasan RA
@@HamzaKhan-ue7ii The khilafa of Muawiyah was very peaceful.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2704
Narrated Al-Hasan Al-Basri:
By Allah, Al-Hasan bin `Ali led large battalions like mountains against Muawiya. `Amr bin Al-As said (to Muawiya), "I surely see battalions which will not turn back before killing their opponents." Muawiya who was really the best of the two men said to him, "O `Amr! If these killed those and those killed these, who would be left with me for the jobs of the public, who would be left with me for their women, who would be left with me for their children?" Then Muawiya sent two Quraishi men from the tribe of `Abd-i-Shams called `Abdur Rahman bin Sumura and `Abdullah bin 'Amir bin Kuraiz to Al-Hasan saying to them, "Go to this man (i.e. Al-Hasan) and negotiate peace with him and talk and appeal to him." So, they went to Al-Hasan and talked and appealed to him to accept peace. Al-Hasan said, "We, the offspring of `Abdul Muttalib, have got wealth and people have indulged in killing and corruption (and money only will appease them)." They said to Al-Hasan, "Muawiya offers you so and so, and appeals to you and entreats you to accept peace." Al-Hasan said to them, "But who will be responsible for what you have said?" They said, "We will be responsible for it." So, whatever Al- Hasan asked they said, "We will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Muawiya. Al-Hasan (Al-Basri) said: I heard Abu Bakr saying, "I saw Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on the pulpit and Al-Hasan bin `Ali was by his side. The Prophet (ﷺ) was looking once at the people and once at Al-Hasan bin `Ali saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him."
@@spawnnpwn4166
I agree it was peaceful and prosperous in a worldly sence. But that doesnt make it a Khilafah. Im not about to clash with the words of RasoolAllah PBUH to make you happy. RasoolAllah PBUH said that after 30 years the Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet PPUH followed by Bitting/tyranical monarchy.
where is your evidence? or do you speak without knowledge?
The first Caliph after Muhammad SAW, was Abu Bakr As-Siddiq. And it ended with Ali ibn' Abi Talib.
The first king started with Muawiyah RA of the Umayyad dynasty, and ended with Sultan Mehmed V Resyad of the Ottoman dynasty.
Hassan ibn abi talib*
Completes 30 years
I disagree with the statement , Since the Muslim brotherhood in my viewpoint is disfunctional without the Caliph ,
And the Ottomans Caliphate , and it's predecessors managed to Unite the Muslims , The Caliph system was abolished by Attaturk , May It be reestablished again. Ameen
@@sultan__8636
Im sorry but your view is doesnt align with what RasoolAllah PBUH said. RasoolAllah PBUH said to the nearest effect that Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet Will last only 30 years and aftwr there will be a tyranical/Bitting Monarchy and after that there will be a enslaving/forceful monarchy and then the Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet Will return.
I understand that the monarchs that came after the Caliphate did unite and protect Muslims, but that doesnt mean they qualify as a Calipahte.
The Caliphate upon the way of the Prophet PPUH:
2 years of Abu Bakr RA
10 years of Umar RA
12 years of Uthman RA
5 years and 6 mounths of Ali RA
6 mounths of Hasan RA
Ottomans are not kings