One thing I forgot to mention in the video: Datavideo made a range of similar "DN-x" DV capture devices, but not all have S-Video or Component inputs. Surprisingly, even the higher model numbers DN-600 and DN-700 have only Composite video inputs. If you need to capture from S-Video or Component, choose carefully.
beautiful, i put many videotapes from vhs to the sony dvd recorder when dvd took over. and make vhs to vhs copies with a decopier. now i am busy restoring an editing set 2x sony SLv815HQ with the video editing system XV-AL200E. (for fun).
These kind of comparisons are useless on a YT platform unless you fit them in a 4K frame or upscale them into 4k to take advantage of the VP9 codec of the platform, 480 is severely compressed nowadays, more compressed than what it use to look like a decade ago.
One thing I forgot to mention in the video: Datavideo made a range of similar "DN-x" DV capture devices, but not all have S-Video or Component inputs. Surprisingly, even the higher model numbers DN-600 and DN-700 have only Composite video inputs. If you need to capture from S-Video or Component, choose carefully.
beautiful, i put many videotapes from vhs to the sony dvd recorder when dvd took over.
and make vhs to vhs copies with a decopier.
now i am busy restoring an editing set 2x sony SLv815HQ with the video editing system XV-AL200E.
(for fun).
Very helpful comparison! Figured the higher end DV capture devices would do better than Canopus.
Also, that song was pure torture...
It's a shame that the DN-500 doesn't save analog video in lossless AVI.
These kind of comparisons are useless on a YT platform unless you fit them in a 4K frame or upscale them into 4k to take advantage of the VP9 codec of the platform, 480 is severely compressed nowadays, more compressed than what it use to look like a decade ago.