150 to my $1. So 70-75 hands likely per shoe right? It will take closer to 3 FULL shoes mathematically to win the side bet right shackleford? So I spend (70 hands x 5 = $350) x 3 full shoes solid (or worse) = $1000-$1100-ish invested and I win $750 net loss around $300. Yay me. Kiss my a$$ BBQ
IF the house is willing to pay 150 to your $1 it means it's not even happening but 1 time every 2 shoes ti even 3 shoes on average. So I bet $5 for approx 55 hands (or more) I lose at key $275 per shoe (or more) and hope to win within 3 shoes??? LMAO😂 @ the reality of 70-75 hands in a shoes call it 70 I spend $5 ×70=350 and within hopefully 2 FULL shoes mind you I can pray 🙏 to break even??? So it's likely more like 3 full shoes to hmwin that bet. So I spend $1000-$1100 to win $750. 😂 Kiss my a$$
Dumb side bet. It's just more side bets and more ways to lose
150 to my $1. So 70-75 hands likely per shoe right? It will take closer to 3 FULL shoes mathematically to win the side bet right shackleford? So I spend (70 hands x 5 = $350) x 3 full shoes solid (or worse) = $1000-$1100-ish invested and I win $750 net loss around $300. Yay me. Kiss my a$$ BBQ
IF the house is willing to pay 150 to your $1 it means it's not even happening but 1 time every 2 shoes ti even 3 shoes on average. So I bet $5 for approx 55 hands (or more) I lose at key $275 per shoe (or more) and hope to win within 3 shoes??? LMAO😂 @ the reality of 70-75 hands in a shoes call it 70 I spend $5 ×70=350 and within hopefully 2 FULL shoes mind you I can pray 🙏 to break even??? So it's likely more like 3 full shoes to hmwin that bet. So I spend $1000-$1100 to win $750. 😂 Kiss my a$$