@@PSD-ms8yl I get what you mean, but it actually ended up being less original compared to the original film because it made it more like just any other action movie. Actually, this movie _should_ have tried to be way more faithful to the original movie and even tried to add more from the manga, and just made the complex plot a bit more easier to understand for more people using a longer runtime, that would have been the best way to go. The script writer for this remake is on record saying he dumbed this movie down because he said mainstream audiences wouldn't be bale to handle it. Basically he admited that he believes his audience is stupid.
Honestly this movie is visually stunning, the tech is accurate, and Scarlett as Major didn’t anger me as it did others. The problem with all of these Hollywood live action attempts is the story. For some reason they see a title that has a huge, loyal fan base and they muck it all up. If they made a movie the real fans could appreciate it wouldn’t grab the casual viewer. I still enjoyed the movie but I wanted and still want more.
She isn't even a good actress. She's stiff, and very unathletic. They needed somebody far more athletic to perform proper movements that convey agility.
That's the only reason I want to see this movie, for the visuals. I'm not putting too much stock in how faithful they are to the Manga, which by the looks of this trailer looks like they took significant liberties with.
LOL For some reason, people love to shit on the live action that was a good adaptation of the original movie(s) but you all keep praising the animated pile of crap that they keep releasing so don't make me laugh, please...
@@M1tjakaramazov The only thing ridiculous is how weebs like you take time out of your day just to watch clips of this movie and put the predictable cliché weeb reply of "the anime was better" comment.
It's just soooooo sad that the amount of work that went into this movie went unnoticed at its review resulting in it tanking. If some watch this as a non-fan of the Ghost In The Shell lore, they will absolutely love it. But because I come from the very core of GITS manga and classic anime series that is Akira level legendary I can see why this movie tanked. They completely failed to capture the essence and depth of this movie.
The deeper story of the original, the core of it, was lost on the script writer and they dumbed it down to a cheap love story. IMO because the producers didn't trust their audience enough to follow it, or maybe the director didn't have enough of a grasp on how to convey it. I like the movie, but I love and rewatch the original all the time. Its a ride,with places for your mind to explore, whereas the live action version is just a story. The director "tells the story" instead of "showing the story". Villeneuve could've done it justice. Or maybe Adam Kane.
The nonsensical whitewashing wasn't even half of what's wrong with this "movie" the problem is It was absolute trash.. no plot tepid action the most WOODEN almost seemingly intentional phoned in acting I've ever seen.. bland lifeless cinematography.. they got just about everything they could've gotten wrong wrong The only improvement being the minor change to the "tank setpiece" where she rips the unit off to save her "brothers" life.. &even the execution on that left a lot to be desired
@@jeremyfenix8078 Villeneuve actually wouldve been the perfect scribe for it.. as it is one of his favourite non western sci-fi fictions (he even inserted design elements from GITS into his BR2049 architecture)
The original animated movie's version not only had 100 times more impact and emotion, but even visually it looked more real and powerful even though it was 2D animation and not 3D animation... and did it over 20 years earlier. I love how in the original, the major actually fails to open the tank even though she tries harder than this and ends up even more damaged by her efforts than in this version. It's a travesty that just because this movie was American-made and is live action that it made multiple levels of more money and way more people watched it.. I'm just thankful that at least some of those people went on to watch the original afterwards.
You clearly missed the point. Ghost in the shell is Akira-level legendary. The problem with this movie is it looks to the fans of the franchise like it was made by people who didn't understand the lore that's why it wasn't received very well. As a standalone movie, yeah it slaps but as a ghost in the shell movie, I can see how much of an insult to that brilliant innocent it is. It is shallow compared to the mindblowing plot twists you will find in the GITS universe.
People defend their fandoms this isn't an original work so of course people will complain if it doesn't match their expectations. Downplaying that into "people just love to complain" is pretty ignorant. It's one of those things you'll realize when Hollywood shits on adapting something you enjoy.
Visually, they did ok, they got some of the core scenes done pretty well, it just falls apart with trying to force a romance, where it was never about love, it was specifically about SENTIENCE. The Puppet Master wanted to prove it had all the trappings of sentient life , the fact he could not reproduce or even die, it made him feel he was simply just a line of code, to which all intents and purposes he was, But what if he wasn't ? By trying to ' Merge' With a human consiousness, could he actually prove and show that AI was just as equal to biological sentience ? All of this was lost on the Live action version, then you had some middling action scenes, and with not alot of the dialog or scenes carrying enough weight it was a trudge towards the finale.🤐
“Visually they did ok”? Shut up man, the Cgi in this movie is flawless. Bitch about whatever you want but the technical aspect of the movie is more than just “ok”
Ironically, the original movie's story _can_ be seen as a love story. Or more like a "strange futuristic marriage story". Even the song Making of a Cyborg's lyrics are about a wedding. The puppet master says it all in the end - it was looking for someone to join with to become something more, and it specifically sought out The Major as the perfect partner to do so, because it knew Kusanagi was having the same kind of thoughts. With Batou in the picture, it's even kind of a love triangle, lol. In the end he supports and loves her regardless of her decision. But in the original, Batou's love is much more reserved, quiet, and comes off as way more platonic.
The fundamental problem I had with this movie is that it doesn't answer the question "WHY does this movie exist?" It's the same problem with most remakes. What was the point of this movie? Meaning, what did it do that the 1995 Animated one didn't do at least as well, if not significantly better? I can't name a single thing. There's no real improvement in the setting, graphics, or sound production. The script is worse, as is the dialogue. So what was the point? From a business one, it's obvious that the point was to make more cash on the reputation of its predecessors. But from a film-making standpoint, there's nothing to recommend this over the prior one. It's not a *bad* movie. It's just a *pointless* one, because the 1995 version exists. If that one hadn't, then this one would be reasonable. But that's not the case.
Weeeeeeellll, not everyone is into anime. This brought the concept to an audience that enjoys sci-fi movies on the mainstream, but who are not necessarily into animation. Same with when AKIRA will eventually be made into a live action flick. It broadens the audience. I love the original very much, but it''s not something my partner is into, however, they really enjoyed the movie with a recognisable hollywood cast.
I just finished watching the 1995 movie and I noticed that the movie is 1 year younger than me lol I'm old. Both movies are good ngl, I like how they went fir Scarlett Johansson for the roll of Major Kusanagi.
you should watch "ghost int the shell 2: innocence" from 2004 aswell, its only with batou and togusa but the major has a big cameo towards the end of the movie . you may also reconise some scenes from the live action movie aswell since the live action is a mix of the story of these two anime movies and the stand alone complex series.
Great movie. I went to see it at the cinema. At the time I thought 2017 Ghost in the Shell was the new Blade Runner. Cos of the movie, I bought a Major Funko Pop.
This isn't a bad live action version at all, but much like the whole movie, it just misses something. The overall vibe / atmosphere and especially the music just isn't there. It's a nice action scene but doesn't feel like more than that. The original story itself isn't really anything THAT special, especially by 2023 standards - so much has been said and written about the theme of transhumanism since 1995 - but the presentation was always top notch, and means the original movie easily holds up as a classic today.
this could have been epic, but of course hollywood had to dumb it down, making Motoko's search for nature of humanity and her eventual trancendence into a family drama...
OK, I'm 53 & have no knowledge of the anime referenced in one of the comments, but I really liked this movie. I also don't have much to steal but would love to have a spider tank yard guard.
Part of what made the original anime so amazing was that it was animated; the visual worldbuilding, the selection of color palettes, the *detail* in the images... knowing that it was animation and not CGI or live-action added a LOT to the experience. As for the film, if one looks past the Whitewashing issue(s), anyone familiar with the original runs face-first into the rewriting of the story into something that, in the end, was a DIFFERENT story. They came so, so close with this one... but meddled with the wrong thing and no amount of spectacular visuals can save a screwed-up story.
this movie may not have been liked by hard core fans but I still think its incredibly good and well done for what it is. lots of movies with source material often don't follow it, a lot of it is about creating your own story while still being true to the source. if the harry potter movies don't say anything about this tip. even the lord of the rings follows this route. somewhat.
I watched the original animation series. I think one issue with this movie is "compressing" too much into a single movie and also a few memorable scenes were put into the movie in an awkward way.
@@JSiuDev They had no choice, they wanted to make a single movie (probably because usually live action movies aren't well received by the public/the fans), not a series of movies and they were right to do so, look at all those ingrates.
It was visually appealing..... I don't get the hate for it..... Even tho it was nit better than original movie but it was still really good story wise no but aesthetics were pretty good
I didn't think it was awful. I enjoy Michael Pitt, and of course Scarlett is never a bad watch. I think most people's issue was that they felt it should have been Japanese actors in the main roles. Which, okay, sure. I get that. But it didnt' make it a *"bad"* film because of their ethnicity.
I thought the film was pretty great. You could say the same about live adaptations of attack on Titan which is clearly European in its architecture and design yet was clearly played by Japanese actors. Nick fury was originally white but was then played by Samuel Jackson. At least in this film there is a reason and when the major was human she was a Japanese girl. Shes in an artificial body after all
No nothing wrong with casting scarlet as a western movie. The issue was it had poor pacing and forced romance sub plot, and weak action scenes until the end, things like Batou's eyes looking goofy. It was too dumbed down ,
Wait...this is Chimera fight from Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty, down to the shape of the arena in which she is fighting. Never seen this movie but i watched GITS anime a long time ago and forgot most of it. I guess they used it for inspiration and an easter egg in Cyberpunk.
The movie wasn't too bad, it really was just the same as the Anime, they did try with the story but I think the problem was we've already seen it. But to anyone who wanted to see it live action as I was it was a good movie, the visuals were great and the acting for the most part was good so for anyone who did enjoy it I am just stating my opinion on why people might of not liked it.
No, it was a different story. Worse. And how they picture it was worse as well. Too much cheesy talking while the original was done in a poetic Blade Runner-like style.
@@deltabadger_official true though it was visually appealing, much like that of blade runner, as well as the sound design too, and music composition, and scenery, but as for the story it seems they just tried to stitch everything together and also add in random bits, kuze for example isn’t displayed like this in the anime movies iirc, overall i enjoyed it for the things i listed above.
@@dream8870 Yeah the sound design was great and the visuals but I agree with you on the stitching, it's like they had a story but they needed the same shots as the anime just so the audience knew what they were watching when they could have tested knew things but kept the look, try out new things but I guess we'll never know.
@@deltabadger_official If I never heard of GITS before this would have been epic to me. But I do and I see where the producer completely missed it. They tried but they missed a lot of the essence and the lore could never be told in one movie. It's deeper than that.
Bit odd that the spider was able to do all the machine gun firing before the target was acquired. Good thing the missiles waited to be accurate or whatever.
They really blew it.. the sound design and pace was so much better, it had big silence moments dream like rhythm.. this is just cgi tank make lots of boom
@@WinWin-oo4uk yeah, sounds dumb...some comic characters were supposed to be white yet their race was changed to black for the movie, nobody complained...
I have no problem with scarlett's dedication to scifi or acting but hollywood nowadays is just so abysmally bad at creating an atmosphere. their movies feel like fast food
The subject of the original story was to extend human identity spread in the NET. The conclusion of this movie is to restore motoko kusanagi's personal identity. Big disagreement.
People who got angry over the casting don't understand the setting. Major Makoto Kusanagi was not only a cyborg, her physical body is long dead, she's just a conciousness inhabiting a robotic body, like an A.I that doesn't even know if it was once human. Anyone could play her as they'll just be playing the body she's currently inhabiting.
Not "anyone", her cyborg body is the one of a WESTERN woman, that has been confirmed a long time ago. There's no way that you're a fan if don't know that and claim that anyone can play the Major. 🤦♀️
The one thing I liked about this movie is that the cyborg had a human brain. I do not believe an AI can function the same as a human or other actual lifeform. The soul, or ghost, comes from life. It's part of all living creatures, except bugs like flies. They are God's little irritating robots. My feeling for this comes from a friend who died, saw his body, returned when he was brought back to life and told me the story. Though both the movie and actual MANGA movies were great and entertaining, which they should be. I can see the author pushing his idea, totally valid, and I can see the movie's version. I don't lose sleep over the arguments. So fruitless.
ko biết nếu công nghệ ai nhận diện mục tiêu và tiêu diệt tự động thi liệu nhân vật chính có sống dk hơn 1 phút ko nhỉ? công nghệ hiện đại mà nhắm bắn lia súng quá chậm.
TL;DR: If you’re a hardcore fan of the manga and 1995 animated film. You won’t like it. If you are a casual fan or someone who doesn’t enjoy anime or couldn’t get into the manga or anime version of GitS, you’ll like it. As with most film adaptations of fictional works that have a dedicated fan base.
As a GitS fan, I don't think it's a bad movie. I can see why people who have never had the pleasure of watching the original movie or the S.A.C. series liked it. My fundamental problem with it is that it's wholly unnecessary as an entry into the GitS franchise, and a poor adaptation to boot. If they changed the story a little bit and branded it as "Spirit in the Can" I'd be like, "hey, this GitS ripoff is actually pretty good." But they went ahead and made a GitS movie and I don't know why, or how they managed to make a mildly enjoyable blockbuster out of a profound masterpiece. This is a major step-down, so you can imagine why a lot of people were upset. I mean I know why they did it - money, but I don't agree that's a valid reason to make an adaptation, especially of a work of such caliber. There's not a lot of ways you can make it better, and an infinite amount of ways you can make it worse. And that's exactly what happened. The fact it wasn't a bad movie speaks more of the source material than anything - they made many mistakes adapting it, and still managed to produce a decent movie.
It was a really cool movie, and many of the scenes almost perfectly recreated what was shown in the anime (which was inspiration for "The Matrix" released just a few years after the anime), but in live action. I wish it had done better at the box office.
You can't have actors and actresses running around and pretending to be what they are not! I mean, what's next? Dogs living with cats!!! You're talking about anarchy.
No. If that good a movie succeeds related to. You’re just being a creepy politics over normality person. Using your own ignorance of life as a weapon against millions of complete strangers. So. Personality disorder.
Hollywood content creators seem to enjoy the death of common sense and basic physics. Shooting at an armored juggernaut of a machine that sports large cannons with a machine gun doesn't display a lot of either. And as the operator of that thing, I would hardly let that deter me from killing the guy on the ground. This is why I can't get into this stuff. Oh well, gotta love the eye candy though.
I just dont think scarlett johanson was the right actress to play motoko looks wise, she doesnt look or act anything like her and we've seen her in enough movies already
Visually nailed it. Story wise they blew their opportunity to do something unique.
Same goes for Alita
It was unique, the story is different from the original.
@@PSD-ms8yl I get what you mean, but it actually ended up being less original compared to the original film because it made it more like just any other action movie. Actually, this movie _should_ have tried to be way more faithful to the original movie and even tried to add more from the manga, and just made the complex plot a bit more easier to understand for more people using a longer runtime, that would have been the best way to go.
The script writer for this remake is on record saying he dumbed this movie down because he said mainstream audiences wouldn't be bale to handle it. Basically he admited that he believes his audience is stupid.
It isn't the best movie ever, but don't think it's a bad movie. Seen far worse adaptations.
@@zhizn_snake
Honestly this movie is visually stunning, the tech is accurate, and Scarlett as Major didn’t anger me as it did others. The problem with all of these Hollywood live action attempts is the story. For some reason they see a title that has a huge, loyal fan base and they muck it all up. If they made a movie the real fans could appreciate it wouldn’t grab the casual viewer. I still enjoyed the movie but I wanted and still want more.
She isn't even a good actress. She's stiff, and very unathletic. They needed somebody far more athletic to perform proper movements that convey agility.
That's the only reason I want to see this movie, for the visuals. I'm not putting too much stock in how faithful they are to the Manga, which by the looks of this trailer looks like they took significant liberties with.
They dumbed the story down so much. It ruined movie for me
LOL For some reason, people love to shit on the live action that was a good adaptation of the original movie(s) but you all keep praising the animated pile of crap that they keep releasing so don't make me laugh, please...
@@Bee-tj8gc
How did they "dumbed" it exactly ?
The original anime scene is ten times scarier.
Then watch the anime 🤷
Marcus / And? Say it! And I'll put you to misery!
@@urthiti Take your meds and chill the fuck out....
@@naughtysauce4323 What a ridiculous reply... 😂
@@M1tjakaramazov The only thing ridiculous is how weebs like you take time out of your day just to watch clips of this movie and put the predictable cliché weeb reply of "the anime was better" comment.
And they added a garand ping to the reload lmao
It's just soooooo sad that the amount of work that went into this movie went unnoticed at its review resulting in it tanking. If some watch this as a non-fan of the Ghost In The Shell lore, they will absolutely love it. But because I come from the very core of GITS manga and classic anime series that is Akira level legendary I can see why this movie tanked. They completely failed to capture the essence and depth of this movie.
The deeper story of the original, the core of it, was lost on the script writer and they dumbed it down to a cheap love story. IMO because the producers didn't trust their audience enough to follow it, or maybe the director didn't have enough of a grasp on how to convey it. I like the movie, but I love and rewatch the original all the time. Its a ride,with places for your mind to explore, whereas the live action version is just a story. The director "tells the story" instead of "showing the story". Villeneuve could've done it justice. Or maybe Adam Kane.
The nonsensical whitewashing wasn't even half of what's wrong with this "movie" the problem is It was absolute trash.. no plot tepid action the most WOODEN almost seemingly intentional phoned in acting I've ever seen.. bland lifeless cinematography.. they got just about everything they could've gotten wrong wrong
The only improvement being the minor change to the "tank setpiece" where she rips the unit off to save her "brothers" life.. &even the execution on that left a lot to be desired
@@jeremyfenix8078 Villeneuve actually wouldve been the perfect scribe for it.. as it is one of his favourite non western sci-fi fictions (he even inserted design elements from GITS into his BR2049 architecture)
No, it tanked because the movie is completely white-washed and is honestly a trash rendition. Everything about it is underwhelming garbage.
@@WardenOfTerra вся наша жизнь здесь оказалась на дне помойки.
Славянск -Краматорск(Украина)
The original animated movie's version not only had 100 times more impact and emotion, but even visually it looked more real and powerful even though it was 2D animation and not 3D animation... and did it over 20 years earlier. I love how in the original, the major actually fails to open the tank even though she tries harder than this and ends up even more damaged by her efforts than in this version. It's a travesty that just because this movie was American-made and is live action that it made multiple levels of more money and way more people watched it.. I'm just thankful that at least some of those people went on to watch the original afterwards.
scarlet johansen is similar to mila jovovic...beautiful n hot sexy n cold fighter blood at same time
Don't get all the hate. It was a ok movie. It's not top tier but good one time movie.
I guess people just like to complain.
You clearly missed the point. Ghost in the shell is Akira-level legendary. The problem with this movie is it looks to the fans of the franchise like it was made by people who didn't understand the lore that's why it wasn't received very well. As a standalone movie, yeah it slaps but as a ghost in the shell movie, I can see how much of an insult to that brilliant innocent it is. It is shallow compared to the mindblowing plot twists you will find in the GITS universe.
People defend their fandoms this isn't an original work so of course people will complain if it doesn't match their expectations.
Downplaying that into "people just love to complain" is pretty ignorant.
It's one of those things you'll realize when Hollywood shits on adapting something you enjoy.
Yes, they do.
Visually, they did ok, they got some of the core scenes done pretty well, it just falls apart with trying to force a romance, where it was never about love, it was specifically about SENTIENCE. The Puppet Master wanted to prove it had all the trappings of sentient life , the fact he could not reproduce or even die, it made him feel he was simply just a line of code, to which all intents and purposes he was, But what if he wasn't ? By trying to ' Merge' With a human consiousness, could he actually prove and show that AI was just as equal to biological sentience ?
All of this was lost on the Live action version, then you had some middling action scenes, and with not alot of the dialog or scenes carrying enough weight it was a trudge towards the finale.🤐
“Visually they did ok”?
Shut up man, the Cgi in this movie is flawless. Bitch about whatever you want but the technical aspect of the movie is more than just “ok”
Ironically, the original movie's story _can_ be seen as a love story. Or more like a "strange futuristic marriage story". Even the song Making of a Cyborg's lyrics are about a wedding. The puppet master says it all in the end - it was looking for someone to join with to become something more, and it specifically sought out The Major as the perfect partner to do so, because it knew Kusanagi was having the same kind of thoughts.
With Batou in the picture, it's even kind of a love triangle, lol. In the end he supports and loves her regardless of her decision. But in the original, Batou's love is much more reserved, quiet, and comes off as way more platonic.
@@zhizn_snake yea it could work if they leaned into that angle a bit more, i think was more apparent in the blade runner movies
Super! Thank you very much!
still waiting for the sequel to this and LUCY ...cmon scarlette!😘😘😍😍🥰🥰
We will never get one thanks to the people who love to shit on the movie for no good reason.
The fundamental problem I had with this movie is that it doesn't answer the question "WHY does this movie exist?" It's the same problem with most remakes.
What was the point of this movie? Meaning, what did it do that the 1995 Animated one didn't do at least as well, if not significantly better? I can't name a single thing.
There's no real improvement in the setting, graphics, or sound production. The script is worse, as is the dialogue. So what was the point? From a business one, it's obvious that the point was to make more cash on the reputation of its predecessors. But from a film-making standpoint, there's nothing to recommend this over the prior one.
It's not a *bad* movie. It's just a *pointless* one, because the 1995 version exists. If that one hadn't, then this one would be reasonable. But that's not the case.
Its called milking the franchise for money. Thats the reason it exists imo.
Weeeeeeellll, not everyone is into anime. This brought the concept to an audience that enjoys sci-fi movies on the mainstream, but who are not necessarily into animation. Same with when AKIRA will eventually be made into a live action flick. It broadens the audience. I love the original very much, but it''s not something my partner is into, however, they really enjoyed the movie with a recognisable hollywood cast.
I just finished watching the 1995 movie and I noticed that the movie is 1 year younger than me lol I'm old.
Both movies are good ngl, I like how they went fir Scarlett Johansson for the roll of Major Kusanagi.
you should watch "ghost int the shell 2: innocence" from 2004 aswell, its only with batou and togusa but the major has a big cameo towards the end of the movie . you may also reconise some scenes from the live action movie aswell since the live action is a mix of the story of these two anime movies and the stand alone complex series.
Bad guys can't shoot straight, even if you're a super advanced AI robot.
sempre bella a vederti non stanchi mai una meravigliosa bellissima adorabile donna scarlett ❤❤❤❤💋💋💋💋💋💋💋🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
Scarlett is always rocking 👌👌
It's cyberpunk movie guys
This movie is crazy 🤩🤩
Not a perfect adaptation of the anime but away better than the others...7/10...
10/10 Alita Battle Angel
@@otuzor nah it was good but not even close to the manga or the original anime movie
@@mineralwater6736 for your review thats ok, me 10/10
@@otuzor ok I respect you opinion I just think the manga was better have a nice day.
@@mineralwater6736 - The original anime isn't even good. The Cameron rendition is way better.
It has ScarJo and it is based on one of my favorite animes of old. enough reason for me to love this movie adaptation.
Great movie. I went to see it at the cinema. At the time I thought 2017 Ghost in the Shell was the new Blade Runner. Cos of the movie, I bought a Major Funko Pop.
The M1 Garand ping is very unsetttling to hear coming from ejecting a magazine.
This looks good
This isn't a bad live action version at all, but much like the whole movie, it just misses something. The overall vibe / atmosphere and especially the music just isn't there. It's a nice action scene but doesn't feel like more than that. The original story itself isn't really anything THAT special, especially by 2023 standards - so much has been said and written about the theme of transhumanism since 1995 - but the presentation was always top notch, and means the original movie easily holds up as a classic today.
Great movie. 9.5/10 in my book.
Konsi movie h
this could have been epic, but of course hollywood had to dumb it down, making Motoko's search for nature of humanity and her eventual trancendence into a family drama...
Where did they hide the fly strip?
ชอบดูหนังเรื่องนี้👍👍👍
Is it me or does Scarlet look buff in this show? Could be the suit I reckon.
She has an athletic build from training for some of the movies she did also they enhance her physique with CGI here for some scenes
Looks like she's wearing a suit akin to a fatsuit
@@jenpachi2408 - No she doesn't hahaha
@@Janken_Pro
No, she trained for the movie. I saw the suit in another video, they made another woman wear it and it was just a normal suit.
it couldve also have been a bunch of things added, cause if you watch that scene from the anime she looks buff asf
OK, I'm 53 & have no knowledge of the anime referenced in one of the comments, but I really liked this movie. I also don't have much to steal but would love to have a spider tank yard guard.
I highly recommend watching the anime of the same name from 1995 if you liked this
@@syntheticsilkwood2206sure.
Part of what made the original anime so amazing was that it was animated; the visual worldbuilding, the selection of color palettes, the *detail* in the images... knowing that it was animation and not CGI or live-action added a LOT to the experience. As for the film, if one looks past the Whitewashing issue(s), anyone familiar with the original runs face-first into the rewriting of the story into something that, in the end, was a DIFFERENT story. They came so, so close with this one... but meddled with the wrong thing and no amount of spectacular visuals can save a screwed-up story.
Как называется фильм? Спасибо за ранее
This movie would have been so much better had they made an original arc instead of trying to make a live action of the original anime.
Что за фильм?
this movie may not have been liked by hard core fans but I still think its incredibly good and well done for what it is. lots of movies with source material often don't follow it, a lot of it is about creating your own story while still being true to the source. if the harry potter movies don't say anything about this tip. even the lord of the rings follows this route. somewhat.
I watched the original animation series. I think one issue with this movie is "compressing" too much into a single movie and also a few memorable scenes were put into the movie in an awkward way.
Hardcore fans were indifferent, it was the twitter activists who've never heard of ghost in the Shell who were angry over it
More like hardcore wannabes... lol...
@@JSiuDev
They had no choice, they wanted to make a single movie (probably because usually live action movies aren't well received by the public/the fans), not a series of movies and they were right to do so, look at all those ingrates.
@@rainmanslim4611
Exactly, and all the people who heard about GitS for the first time like 5 minutes ago...
so good actor.
Blows my mind how a director captured this movie almost practically shot for shot
I love this movie
Nice good
They need to make more .It was fabulous
It was visually appealing..... I don't get the hate for it..... Even tho it was nit better than original movie but it was still really good story wise no but aesthetics were pretty good
I know original comic book, it's a superb adaptation.
Uploaded full movie
I didn't think it was awful. I enjoy Michael Pitt, and of course Scarlett is never a bad watch. I think most people's issue was that they felt it should have been Japanese actors in the main roles. Which, okay, sure. I get that. But it didnt' make it a *"bad"* film because of their ethnicity.
Dhijjoj
I thought the film was pretty great. You could say the same about live adaptations of attack on Titan which is clearly European in its architecture and design yet was clearly played by Japanese actors. Nick fury was originally white but was then played by Samuel Jackson. At least in this film there is a reason and when the major was human she was a Japanese girl. Shes in an artificial body after all
@@optchurch1402 That's so true. Good point!
No nothing wrong with casting scarlet as a western movie. The issue was it had poor pacing and forced romance sub plot, and weak action scenes until the end, things like Batou's eyes looking goofy. It was too dumbed down ,
Wait...this is Chimera fight from Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty, down to the shape of the arena in which she is fighting. Never seen this movie but i watched GITS anime a long time ago and forgot most of it. I guess they used it for inspiration and an easter egg in Cyberpunk.
Movie name please
The movie wasn't too bad, it really was just the same as the Anime, they did try with the story but I think the problem was we've already seen it.
But to anyone who wanted to see it live action as I was it was a good movie, the visuals were great and the acting for the most part was good so for anyone who did enjoy it I am just stating my opinion on why people might of not liked it.
No, it was a different story. Worse. And how they picture it was worse as well. Too much cheesy talking while the original was done in a poetic Blade Runner-like style.
@@deltabadger_official true though it was visually appealing, much like that of blade runner, as well as the sound design too, and music composition, and scenery, but as for the story it seems they just tried to stitch everything together and also add in random bits, kuze for example isn’t displayed like this in the anime movies iirc, overall i enjoyed it for the things i listed above.
@@dream8870 Yeah the sound design was great and the visuals but I agree with you on the stitching, it's like they had a story but they needed the same shots as the anime just so the audience knew what they were watching when they could have tested knew things but kept the look, try out new things but I guess we'll never know.
@@deltabadger_official If I never heard of GITS before this would have been epic to me. But I do and I see where the producer completely missed it. They tried but they missed a lot of the essence and the lore could never be told in one movie. It's deeper than that.
@@floatingrabbit3556I agree. As an original story, it would be great. That's the power of being original.
Bit odd that the spider was able to do all the machine gun firing before the target was acquired. Good thing the missiles waited to be accurate or whatever.
It was being manually controlled. So every time Cutter wanted it to fire, it fired.
The thumbnail is not what you think
I didn't think anything of it lol
The Thumbnail somehow got me here lol
There's just some things the artstyle can add with cartoons that no cgi or film ever can. The movie wasnt bad but far from the original.
Do not ever never compare books and comics with movies. Its not the same and will never be. You dont compare a live concert with a node book
They really blew it.. the sound design and pace was so much better, it had big silence moments dream like rhythm.. this is just cgi tank make lots of boom
This scene was so surreal and apocalyptic in the original movie
Yeah, and the art style is completely lost with the recent series so what's the point of this argument ? 🙄
@@Jjhawkk
How do you want to make a GitS movie without CGI ? People, I swear... 🤦♀️
Am I dreaming of a butterfly
Are butterflies dreaming of me?
Как називаеца этот фильм.?
Here after playing cyberpunk 2077 phantom liberty
0:27 why does it sound like a garand clip
movie name,??????
Why can’t Hollywood just make new ideas vs ruining established stories?
hate to say it, but, with all its inconsistencies, this film had a more satisfying ending than the original anime version
It’s a shame this film didn’t do to well; I would have liked a sequel.
People complained that the lead wasn't Japanese so people didn't go see it.
@@WinWin-oo4uk yeah, sounds dumb...some comic characters were supposed to be white yet their race was changed to black for the movie, nobody complained...
@@ivyme5783 Vox did a video about it
Read the Comments m.th-cam.com/video/zB0lrSebyng/w-d-xo.html
yes, indeed..
Just imagine how much better this would have been with an asian cast.
I have no problem with scarlett's dedication to scifi or acting but hollywood nowadays is just so abysmally bad at creating an atmosphere. their movies feel like fast food
The subject of the original story was to extend human identity spread in the NET. The conclusion of this movie is to restore motoko kusanagi's personal identity. Big disagreement.
This is a cute slow firing metal spooder.
People who got angry over the casting don't understand the setting. Major Makoto Kusanagi was not only a cyborg, her physical body is long dead, she's just a conciousness inhabiting a robotic body, like an A.I that doesn't even know if it was once human. Anyone could play her as they'll just be playing the body she's currently inhabiting.
Not "anyone", her cyborg body is the one of a WESTERN woman, that has been confirmed a long time ago. There's no way that you're a fan if don't know that and claim that anyone can play the Major. 🤦♀️
The one thing I liked about this movie is that the cyborg had a human brain. I do not believe an AI can function the same as a human or other actual lifeform. The soul, or ghost, comes from life. It's part of all living creatures, except bugs like flies. They are God's little irritating robots. My feeling for this comes from a friend who died, saw his body, returned when he was brought back to life and told me the story. Though both the movie and actual MANGA movies were great and entertaining, which they should be. I can see the author pushing his idea, totally valid, and I can see the movie's version. I don't lose sleep over the arguments. So fruitless.
映像はきれいだったけど本作アニメを焼き直しただけの映画だったな。
3次元実写化して本作の世界観を超える何かがあったらよかったけど、見当たらなかったな。
ko biết nếu công nghệ ai nhận diện mục tiêu và tiêu diệt tự động thi liệu nhân vật chính có sống dk hơn 1 phút ko nhỉ? công nghệ hiện đại mà nhắm bắn lia súng quá chậm.
TL;DR: If you’re a hardcore fan of the manga and 1995 animated film. You won’t like it.
If you are a casual fan or someone who doesn’t enjoy anime or couldn’t get into the manga or anime version of GitS, you’ll like it.
As with most film adaptations of fictional works that have a dedicated fan base.
As a GitS fan, I don't think it's a bad movie. I can see why people who have never had the pleasure of watching the original movie or the S.A.C. series liked it. My fundamental problem with it is that it's wholly unnecessary as an entry into the GitS franchise, and a poor adaptation to boot. If they changed the story a little bit and branded it as "Spirit in the Can" I'd be like, "hey, this GitS ripoff is actually pretty good." But they went ahead and made a GitS movie and I don't know why, or how they managed to make a mildly enjoyable blockbuster out of a profound masterpiece. This is a major step-down, so you can imagine why a lot of people were upset. I mean I know why they did it - money, but I don't agree that's a valid reason to make an adaptation, especially of a work of such caliber. There's not a lot of ways you can make it better, and an infinite amount of ways you can make it worse. And that's exactly what happened. The fact it wasn't a bad movie speaks more of the source material than anything - they made many mistakes adapting it, and still managed to produce a decent movie.
That's not true so don't talk for everyone. Thanks.
I thought the cartoon Stand Alone Complex sucked. I prefer the US live action movie. Never saw Arise
Аниме Бомба.Фильм тоже крутой!!!
日本版待ったナシだろ！
草薙素子・広瀬すず
バトー・なかやまきんに君
荒巻部長・田中泯
トグサ・草なぎ剛
サイトウ・西島秀俊
パズ・原田泰造
イシカワ・佐藤浩市
ボーマ・クロちゃん
Why do they always change it though. And who id the freaking robot dude that gets grabbed instead of her.
It was a really cool movie, and many of the scenes almost perfectly recreated what was shown in the anime (which was inspiration for "The Matrix" released just a few years after the anime), but in live action. I wish it had done better at the box office.
2:52 2:59 3:04 so beautiful ❤
일본 애니메이션에서 본 것 같은데 2017년에 실사로 만들었었군.
Ilu było przede mną...
誤解してた、良くこのシーン作ったねー😂
Amazing movie. Highly underrated. Could have had wild success but was constantly attacked by the politically correct cancelation crowd.
You can't have actors and actresses running around and pretending to be what they are not! I mean, what's next? Dogs living with cats!!! You're talking about anarchy.
No. If that good a movie succeeds related to.
You’re just being a creepy politics over normality person.
Using your own ignorance of life as a weapon against millions of complete strangers.
So. Personality disorder.
@@richardpierce3206 isnt that what an actor is supposed to do
The movie was garbage
@@arvinolteng3201 The sarcasm was lost on you.
적어도 원작에 누가 되는 후작은 만들지 말았어야지..
😜🤪😀
Never watched never will.
Не гибкий, не манёвренный робот с такими уязвимыми не дублированными местами да ещё и на ручном управлении?_. Зачем?
Hollywood content creators seem to enjoy the death of common sense and basic physics. Shooting at an armored juggernaut of a machine that sports large cannons with a machine gun doesn't display a lot of either. And as the operator of that thing, I would hardly let that deter me from killing the guy on the ground.
This is why I can't get into this stuff. Oh well, gotta love the eye candy though.
the attack is for distraction and the behaivor of the tank commander is not seach and destroy its villan
コレジャナイ感がとても
完成度は高いが実写にする必要が無いし、実写化してはいけない作品。
Hi
The place is in Hong Kong 😍 ❤️ 💕 💓 💖 😍 , ....
Makes more sense to me, call it scarab or beetle tank, 'cause it has 6 legs
6 legs and 2 cannons
you know, before the arm rips off, the muscles are pretty hot, lol
In the future, robots have terrible aim.
Nice sound of shooting, I on my smartphone like so around and loud of #dolbyatmos
phim nay toi thik cho 10đ
what was any of that even for
So she’s technically a female Robocop
Based on the anime that defined anime. Scarlett Johansson is Major Motoko Kusanagi.
Is this what artificial intelligence want to build on earth
so her robot body was made by a foreign company, make sense for the look..
I just dont think scarlett johanson was the right actress to play motoko looks wise, she doesnt look or act anything like her and we've seen her in enough movies already
Well there is a shortage of full body conversion borgs right now. But I am sure as soon as one is free they can refilm it.
@@GamerKatz_1971 oh yeah way to state the obvious. That is a really dumb way to reply dude
What's Broody Skywalker doing here?
I hate that CGI running stuff at 0:51- so fake and corny...
This movie: Blade Runner 2049 meets Terminator 2 or 3, meets The Matrix ?
Have you seen the original?
ถ้าจะมีรถถังโง่และประสิทธิภาพต่ำแบบนี้ อย่ามีเลย
すばらしです
おしろい
上手くかけません
さ
That looks like the man that stared in the terminator