ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ส.ค. 2014
- Subscribe Now To Our Network Channels
The NewsHour Debate : goo.gl/LfNgFF
ET Now : goo.gl/5XreUq
Times Now : goo.gl/U9ibPb
Social Media Links :-
Twitter - goo.gl/FzJIpz
Facebook - goo.gl/CC7rGc
G+ - goo.gl/O1iEp5
Also visit our website - goo.gl/XPUXe8
A defiant Pakistan made it clear that it will continue talking to Kashmiri separatists, saying that the "bottomline" for Indo-Pak talks on Kashmir issue was to engage all stakeholders, evoking a sharp reaction from India which accused it of adopting an approach different to the one laid down by Simla Agreement. Within hours of Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit justifying his meeting with Kashmiri separatists, saying "We need to engage with all stakeholders", Spokesperson in the External Affairs Ministry Syed Akbaruddin said as per Simla Agreement it was a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan and any other approach will "not yield results". The fresh round of sparring has raised doubts about theprospects of early resumption of the dialogue process for bringing the strained ties back on track. "We need to engage with all stakeholders. It is not a question of either, or as far as we are concerned. We are engaging with India to find peaceful ways," Basit said during an interaction with foreign journalists here while reacting to India's stand that Pakistan should either choose dialogue with separatists or Indian government. Justifying his meeting with the Kashmiri separatists, Basit said, "We strongly believe that our interaction ishelpful to the process itself. It is helpful to find peaceful solution to the problem. It is important to engage with all stakeholders. So that is the bottomline for us." India had called off the talks between Foreign Secretaries slated for August 25, telling Pakistan bluntly to choose between an Indo-Pak dialogue or hobnobbing with the separatists. At the same time, he said his country "attaches enormous importance" to its ties with India and that there was no need to be "pessimistic" about cancellation of the Foreign Secretary-level talks. Noting that Kashmir was a "bilateral dispute", he said there was no need to be "pessimistic" about cancellation of the Foreign Secretary-level talks and that both the countries should move forward.
Basit said Pakistan understands that it was a "complex situation" but added it was positive and will not allow distractions to come in the way of finding solutions to the problems. Basit said the Kashmir issue should be looked at "dispassionately" and asserted that the aim of his meetings with the Kashmiri separatists was to find a viable solution to the issue. He said Indian diplomats in Islamabad also meet people from all hues. But the Pakistan envoy parried a question on whether his government will allow Indian diplomats to meet local leaders from Baloch region. Amidst massive opposition and anger over Pakistan High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit's meeting with separatist leaders. The Pakistan Envoy defends the meeting saying it is a routine practice to hold such meetings and when TIMES NOW asked straight forward questions, Basit failed to answer the 3 direct questions posed by TIMES NOW.
In a debate moderated by TIMES NOW's Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, panelists -- G Parthasarthy, Former High Commissioner to Pakistan; Maroof Raza, Strategic Affairs Analyst; Lt. Gen. (Retd) Shankar Prasad, Defence Analyst; Zafar Hilaly, Former Pak Ambassador to US; Syed Tariq Pirzada, Strategic Affairs Analyst; Barrister Zafarullah Khan, Senior Advocate and President ,Watan Party -- discuss whether after the Pakistan envoy fumbled, it is time for a diplomatic freeze with Islamabad
![กินอาหาร ถูก vs แพง!! จานละ 500,000 vs จานละ 50!! [Ver. 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FF_HppKg4vs/mqdefault.jpg)
Mahroof raza rocks!!! I salute Mahroof !
I love India vs Pakistan debates most . Thank you Arnab. I love all your debates you are a true nationalist.
Peerzada is a joker seriously...
I'm worried why Arnab needs to talk like a PM decision maker with international members. I think, he should refrain from these.
Why are these people invoking hatred in the minds of both Pakistani and Indian people. Arnab goswami , kindly organise the debate in sensible and solution obtaining manner. Why can't these serious topics be dealt with the same seriousness it requires.
providing an hour long hatred debates and not indulging in any sensible debates does not solve this problem. If you can't solve the problem atleast don't arise new problems by invoking unnecessary hatred in the people's mind .
Parthasarthy epitomises diplomacy. Pirzada, on the other hand, ...
this "anchor" fellow comes to a conclusion as well ! amazing he is not only an "anchor" but is also debating !!
I salute maroof raza for his befitting reply
Peerzada did only two things in this debate 1) Barking 2) Drink coffee.Thank you.
arnab superb as always
when this Arnab will start listening to penalists ?
he is an anchor not an actor. Whosoever has watched this episode can observe the difference between time he gives to Mr. Parthasarthi, Pakistani penalist from Lahor, Zafar Hilaili and Tarik Pirzada. Name of this program is Newshour Debate. But Arnab plays it like an Bollywood movie.
@ 29:30 Mahroof slams Pirzada. Should have done it much earlier.
Mr. Zafarullah Khan should move to India with his family ...
these two Baldies are making me giggle ...... especially the first baldy HILELI with the fake British accent ....... MAZAA AA GAYA!!!
why is India so touchy about a meeting? terrible for the media to stir up so much hatred. This Hileli guy makes sense
Oh ghosh, Arnab - one fool is missing - Kasuri - this comedy show is not complete..
I don't understand why India did not stop Huriyat leaders from meeting Pakistani high commissioner ? Why don't we arrest Huriyat Leaders for treason ?
Why do you even bring Mr perzada on debate
the barrister is also from a political party in Pakistan according to the above
salute to barrister zafarullah khan for his integrity.
wow this "anchor" fellow accuses people on air as well ! horrifying
respects for the barrister
@24:45,,like that Arnab,
They say they care for kashmiris...do first care for pakistanis...
this "anchor" fellow must learn how to be a news anchor. How can he also become involved in the "debate"?? how ridiculous is that
Arnab is a blemish on Journalism. He does not listen, interrupts the speakers who have a different opinion. I have seen only that journalist who visited to Janab Hafiz Saeed Saheb tackled Arnab properly.
Hez a very good journalist of free indian media just bcoz pakistani leaders are embarrassed dont make ur point.
Not just Peerzaada's accent is fake.
they are getting the taste of their own racipee
pakistan acts with india like they are usa....lol
Arnab was great
these pak representatives are always been hypocritical...waste of time to listen to them...tatally waste....they are passing through internal coup and nothing in their hands now .it's totally up to army......
Thatz how pakistani run away whn they are being shown the mirror.
BOTH THE TAKLUS ARE SO COMMUNAL
Aranb Goswami is smart guy. He just want to increase TRP of hsi channel whatever way it comes. Thats why he do not call logical speaking people like Najam Sethi on program. He calls these bullshiting people like Zafal Hilali and Pirjada. He just want to increase TRP of his channel.
hahaha after 40.00 haramzada is shouting like an ass haha he doesnt know he has been muted....
Why do you even bring Mr perzada on debate