(Spoilers) 11:46 hard agree on Volo. I be seeing those videos about 'Volo's Betrayal'. Like why are y'all surprised? Hell, Cogita even brought up how he spoke about the Ginkgo Guild which he was apparently a part of like he 'wasn't one of them'. Kamado's reaction surprised me more than Volo did.
LONG COMMENT INCOMING!!! Just sharing some thoughts lol I didn't disagree with a whole of lot of these honestly. I agree with your thoughts on Espeon (it's my favorite eeveelution). While I don't necessarily agree with you on Meganium and Chesnaught, I do think that they're both cool, and you're based for saying so. However, I think my biggest disagreement is with Gen 5 designs. Personally, there aren't many Gen 5 Pokemon that look weird, and many of favorite designs are from Unova. The best bugs are here (Volcarona, Scolipede, Crustle, Genesect), and Pokemon like Krookodile, Chandelure, Braviary, Haxorus, Hydreigon, and the box art legends are sick. Sure, Pokemon like Munna, Conkeldurr, and Sigilyph are here, but personally, some of the best designs from Kalos are less impressive than these guys (granted, Kalos has way less Pokemon than Unova, but the good to bad to mid ratio seems less good in Kalos than Unova to me)
"I have hot takes guy, just hear me out." The "hot takes" in questions: "HMs are better left forgotten" "Charizard isn't the coolest starter" "Gengar is overrated" "Gen 5 has the worst designs" OH BROTHER THIS GUY STINKS. But FR, there was only like 5 hot takes in this video lmao.
i absolutely do not agree with you on the alternative arts, i don't really care about the card game but oh my god those 3d model cards are objectively fucking vile and the total death of creativity, i don't get why anyone would prefer them over the masterfully designed and HAND DRAW **by actual artists** (not cgi!!!) alternatives
@@tungstenogamign well I appreciate the artworks and many of them are very well designed I was mainly just saying that how much the concept is being done it’s overstaying its welcome too soon
@@Nido123 yeah maybe i misunderstood your point sorry but i personally love to see these different types of artworks that not only display the pokemon itself but an idea, a story and i'd love them to only make these type of cards ahahay, i don't really think that they are overdoing the "concept" because the cards are (most of the time) very different from eachother
I agree with very few of your takes. You don't seem to be too fond of Gen 1 😂. Regarding Gen 5, I really love the 2D animated sprites and I think some of the more interesting designs came out of the game. Genesect, Scolipede (love the venipede line's cries too), Krookodile, Volcarona, Haxorus, Liligant, etc. I do agree, however, that some of the ugliest designs came out of Gen 5 too. Seismatoad, Conkeldurr, Pignite, Swanna, Vullaby, etc. (Stunfisk is cool) Some designs are odd, too. Why does Durant not evolve? What is the point of Boufalant? Why is Sigilyph the only interesting flying type (except maybe Archeops)? Good video 👍
@@Tennhero I mean all generations definitely have good and gross designs, but Paldea and Unova probably lean farthest into the bad designs in my opinion
You're correct on a couple things, but for the most part....damn you're not kidding about these being bad opinions.
lol
(Spoilers)
11:46 hard agree on Volo.
I be seeing those videos about 'Volo's Betrayal'. Like why are y'all surprised?
Hell, Cogita even brought up how he spoke about the Ginkgo Guild which he was apparently a part of like he 'wasn't one of them'.
Kamado's reaction surprised me more than Volo did.
My first video with 1k views in 2 months 💪
finally someone told the truth about espeon and umbreon🙌
u did a good job on making people disagree judging by comments bro gg
bunch of mild takes at best
@@HimboKirby or is it just that you agree
Sinnoh needs another remake, legends is too different and bdsp sucked hard
LONG COMMENT INCOMING!!! Just sharing some thoughts lol
I didn't disagree with a whole of lot of these honestly. I agree with your thoughts on Espeon (it's my favorite eeveelution). While I don't necessarily agree with you on Meganium and Chesnaught, I do think that they're both cool, and you're based for saying so.
However, I think my biggest disagreement is with Gen 5 designs. Personally, there aren't many Gen 5 Pokemon that look weird, and many of favorite designs are from Unova. The best bugs are here (Volcarona, Scolipede, Crustle, Genesect), and Pokemon like Krookodile, Chandelure, Braviary, Haxorus, Hydreigon, and the box art legends are sick. Sure, Pokemon like Munna, Conkeldurr, and Sigilyph are here, but personally, some of the best designs from Kalos are less impressive than these guys (granted, Kalos has way less Pokemon than Unova, but the good to bad to mid ratio seems less good in Kalos than Unova to me)
"I have hot takes guy, just hear me out."
The "hot takes" in questions:
"HMs are better left forgotten"
"Charizard isn't the coolest starter"
"Gengar is overrated"
"Gen 5 has the worst designs"
OH BROTHER THIS GUY STINKS. But FR, there was only like 5 hot takes in this video lmao.
@@monte_2000 they’re hot takes to someone
i absolutely do not agree with you on the alternative arts, i don't really care about the card game but oh my god those 3d model cards are objectively fucking vile and the total death of creativity, i don't get why anyone would prefer them over the masterfully designed and HAND DRAW **by actual artists** (not cgi!!!) alternatives
@@tungstenogamign well I appreciate the artworks and many of them are very well designed I was mainly just saying that how much the concept is being done it’s overstaying its welcome too soon
@@Nido123 yeah maybe i misunderstood your point sorry but i personally love to see these different types of artworks that not only display the pokemon itself but an idea, a story and i'd love them to only make these type of cards ahahay, i don't really think that they are overdoing the "concept" because the cards are (most of the time) very different from eachother
how is meganium the best johto starter?!?!?
@@erikaltmannjohannesen6964 I meant just based on design
it just is
@@maxaro5044 but typhlosion….
@@erikaltmannjohannesen6964 Typhlosion? more like MIDphlosion
@@erikaltmannjohannesen6964dude just learned about opinions
Your third take is not a hot take
Also you said Arceus wrong, but it used to be correct but Pokemon changed it
@@NewRedninjadyl I feel like some genwunners out there would hate Arceus for being different
I agree with very few of your takes. You don't seem to be too fond of Gen 1 😂.
Regarding Gen 5, I really love the 2D animated sprites and I think some of the more interesting designs came out of the game. Genesect, Scolipede (love the venipede line's cries too), Krookodile, Volcarona, Haxorus, Liligant, etc.
I do agree, however, that some of the ugliest designs came out of Gen 5 too. Seismatoad, Conkeldurr, Pignite, Swanna, Vullaby, etc. (Stunfisk is cool)
Some designs are odd, too. Why does Durant not evolve? What is the point of Boufalant? Why is Sigilyph the only interesting flying type (except maybe Archeops)?
Good video 👍
@@Tennhero I mean all generations definitely have good and gross designs, but Paldea and Unova probably lean farthest into the bad designs in my opinion