Leadership Styles - the six leadership styles you need! Daniel Goleman Leadership Styles based on EI
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ค. 2024
- Take your leadership to the next level with the best Leadership Styles available today! I've successfully used these styles as the top leader of a $200M company with more than 1000 employees. You can learn how to use them too! This leadership framework is built on using emotional intelligence together with a flexible and fluid leadership to reach resonant leadership. Learn more by reading the book Primal Leadership: geni.us/bRaBET (Amazon, As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.)
These six leadership styles will help you drive engagement and performance in your organization. Remember: all of the styles should be used, it is NOT about picking just one of these styles and sticking to it. The entire point is to choose a leadership style depending on the situation, circumstances, involved people, etc. For this reason, I really urge you to watch the video in its entirety, otherwise you might apply this framework in the wrong way.
We also show you why the leadership styles by Goleman are the best through a comparison with the Kurt Lewin styles and the Full Range Leadership Model.
If you like this video, please join our leadership newsletter for even more leadership info: www.leadershipahoy.com/newsl-...
Video Contents:
00:39 Background: Resonant Leadership
02:14 Commanding/Directive Leadership Style
04:26 Coaching Leadership Style
06:23 Democratic/Participative Leadership Style
08:33 Affiliative Leadership Style
10:39 Pacesetting Leadership Style
12:50 Visionary/Authoritative Leadership Style
14:58 Examples on how to use the Six Leadership Styles
17:40 Why are these the best leadership styles? Comparison with Kurt Lewin and Full Range Leadership Model
Visit our portal with in-depth info on 25+ leadership styles at: www.leadershipahoy.com/leader...
Additional information, articles used for this video and sources, can be found at our site dedicated to leadership styles, www.leadershipahoy.com. Our main article on the six leadership styles based on emotional intelligence to reach resonant leadership, a framework created by Daniel Goleman: www.leadershipahoy.com/the-si...
Visionary leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/vision...
Pacesetting leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/pacese...
Democratic/participative leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/democr...
Commanding/Coercive/directive leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/direct...
Affiliative leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/affili...
Coaching leadership style: www.leadershipahoy.com/coachi...
I had an opportunity to attend a full course of it from Hardvard Business School training course and been using it for few years. It works and appreciated Goleman for inventing this concept. Reco to all managers to use this.
All encompassing, concise, and very informative video on modern leadership styles. Thank you for a great educational tool!
Thank you. Clear & concise
Great video! Clear and concise and great examples of each of them. Much appreciated!!
Thank you for your kind words!
Amazing video! very insightful and helpful
Thank you so much
So helpful for me as a student..
Very great and engaging video. Learning takes place watching this video. Would like to know more. Thank you!
Excellent video, very clear and concise! I am trying to understand how the Goleman leadership styles can be employed in the airline industry. With COVID-19 completely disrupting the industry, and constant change in travel policies/restrictions combined with low passenger confidence, it is very challenging for the airlines today to be agile and adapt to the eve changing business dynamics. So in such a scenario, what styles within this framework shall be employed by contemporary leaders.
excellent video, detail clear and interested. thank you very much.
Thanks a lot!
This video is so educating and informing. I will employ the same framework ....
I love this video so much! Thanks for the informative leadership style video and sharing it with us.
You are so welcome! Thanks a lot for the feedback!
Emotion i think from our inter while i listen this is both for inter and intra so thank you very much your contribution and postive esstem as for reinforcement negative to attack ours inner intra skill so more motivation and personaltity extrovert and introvert can differentiate our style on behaviours, so pros and cons we can know so thank you democrative party style disscussion with examples in real practices with top to bottom and bottom up relations excellent approches in proper visions
for a team in our country so ever smart
Kudos to you @Leadershipahoy!! Your channel will reach great heights soon with this wonderful content. Thanks for bringing such content. Keep up the Great Work! :)
Thank you very much! This kind of comment makes me want to continue posting videos. Much appreciated!
Actually there are five criteria to Goleman's theory: 14
1.
Self awareness
2.
Self regulation
3.
Motivation
4.
Empathy
5.
Social skills
Here you have listed Self-awareness twice
Best video for the topic 🤩
Thank you for your kind words!
Great video - very informative. Can you let me know which blend of styles you think would work best for a high school management situation?
Most definitely! I think you should use them all of course, but I guess a bit stronger focus on coaching, visionary, and affiliative. Pacesetting and commanding should be saved for special occasions as much as possible. Democratic leadership, sure, but don't let the kids get the decision power completely!
That would my thoughts and gut feeling..
Great video, I enjoyed watching. Can you give the specific references for Daniel Goleman Leadership Styles, (Title of article, Publisher, any co authors, Date, etc). I would love to read the source articles also. Thank you.
Hello, thanks for your comment!
You can find more information on references in our article here: www.leadershipahoy.com/the-six-leadership-styles-by-daniel-goleman/ as well as additional references in the specific leadership styles articles that we link to in the aforementioned article.
Great Video!
maybe remember to show few more female leaders ; )
Thanks for the comment. Three of the six leadership styles are represented with female leaders, so I'm not sure I completely understand what you mean. Could you please give me an example?
@@leadershipahoy6519 igreat than its Good! Just perceived it the way that most Leaders were male and their assistance female. The Video has helped me and I am just politically concious. Guess you too. Great input especially youre Personal one thank you. ✌
Thanks to you too!
Very helpful, thank you! I think it’s not quite fair to critique a simplified version of Authoritarian leadership under Kurt and Lewin...to me it’s quite similar to commanding leadership under Goleman. Even so, nothing lost and much gained from this great summary of Goleman
Thank you for your comment. My point is that Autocratic or Authoritarian leadership as defined by Lewin was a behavior, and not a style a leader chose. Hence, you were either Autocratic, Democratic, or Laissez-Faire. Commanding leadership is a temporary style to be used together with the five others, and that makes all the difference to me. Lots of people think that you should choose one style as a leader, and if they pick Autocratic, they will hurt themselves as well as their environment in the long run. That's my opinion at least.
Great to hear you gained from watching the video, it makes me happy to hear!
This was so educational, as constructive feedback, you should use your real voice, hearing a machine for a long time gets tiring
Hi, this is a great video. Could give example within healthcare with these six styles, please. cheers
Hello, and thanks for the compliment!
I would use all the styles in healthcare as well. In case of emergency, you need to increase the commanding proportion a bit, in case of difficult conversations with upset people, I might push the affiliative style a bit. When it comes to many situations, it is simply about people working with other people, and that means there is room for using all the styles.
After watching your video on the six leadership styles, I am wondering if you could give an example in regards to public education.
Hello and thanks for your comment!
That is a wide topic to answer in a comment I'm afraid. In general, these styles work in all industries or professions, it is just a matter of using the right style for the right situation. A teacher also needs to balance the styles and providing purpose and goals (visionary), bonding and empathizing appropriately with the students (affiliative), setting clear rules when needed (commanding), building the confidence and skill of students long term (coaching), and pushing them when they need to get over a mile stone or a hump (pacesetting). Last but not least, learning from and listening to the ideas of the students, and ensuring their engagement by using the democratic style.
These are a couple of brief examples connected to public education in the role of a teacher, I hope that helps. If you have a question about a more specific situation, just let me know and I will try to help.
thank you very much for your detailed information about leadership. i think we can all agree that leadership style should be based on contingency/ situation/ context when applying them. how would you comment on the Goleman model when applying leadership in a Chinese culture which has been culturally conditioned and also for many thousands of years where emperor is the only ruler of a country and therefore a culturally conditioned top down approach. adding to that, research also shows that Chinese are often more past-focused which makes the culture a very strong top-down approach for leadership. However, in the agile world today, i do agree that there should be a continuous change/ improvement in the style of leadership to meet the challenge aheads so that the business can be sustained. So how would be the possible solution to change the leadership of a chinese company, which is so culturally adapted to top-down or parentistic leadership to a leadership which is more adaptive to changes?
thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Keith
Hello Keith and thanks for your question!
This is a very complex issue, and I think potentially changing something like this will take time. It has to come from the leaders, who need to increase inclusion and empowerment. People need to clearly understand that their input is wanted, even desired, and that input need to be treated with respect. Over time, a more open and participative company culture might emerge. Again, this needs to come from the leaders and be thoroughly spread and communicated. That's my two cents anyway!
How can I design LS model?
Are there any universal examples for affirmative styles?thanx
Hello!
Not sure what you mean by affirmative styles, can you explain further?
How shall I know my leadership style?
IIn-depth democratic leadership course: leadershipahoy.coachannel.com/unlock-your-teams-capacity-with-democratic-leadership. You can also get my detailed guide on how to successfully implement Pacesetting leadership right here: www.digistore24.com/product/451141.
Please ask any questions you like about leadership styles. I have studied, observed and practiced this during my twenty years as a leader. I'd be happy to help!
✍🏾
Thanks for the comment!
Sorry I had to laugh about the affiliative leadership style, about not becoming such good friends that you can't provide criticism etc. My response was "luckily I'm a mean friend" hahaha
That's a good one. When I give constructive feedback, I spend a minute in the beginning on why my upcoming message is for their sake and not for my own. I also mention that the easiest thing for me would be to do nothing. Instead, I provide feedback because I care about them.
This lead-in normally gets their attention and opens them up receiving criticism quite well.
@@leadershipahoy6519 Nice. I also follow Carla Harris TH-cam, and her advice for giving constructive criticism is starting with what the person has been getting right and then moving onto the things that could use some improvement. That way it is more well rounded and the person knows that their good qualities are being appreciated.
Decent video but the constant plugging of the website and "keep watching" is jarring.
Thanks for the comment. Sorry to hear this disturbed your viewing experience.
Democratic leadership style is best
I completely agree! I created an online course for it, where I share the methods and tricks I use in my job as an international CEO. I have used this successfully to build strong and great teams several times. Check it out: www.leadershipahoy.com/democratic-leadership-course-taught-by-a-ceo/
context and situation specific. This would not be applicable in a military or law enforcement setting
Very touchy feely Kumbaya but not very realistic