Clean & Unclean Foods (Part 2 of 2) - Examining Monte Judah's teaching on the kosher food laws
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2024
- This is part 2 of the most comprehensive Biblical examination we’ve ever done on this channel on why followers of Jesus are not required to eat biblically clean or kosher. We're going to dive deep into the Torah and the Gospels and more, tracing the thread of God’s commands about food. And we’re going to use a video by a Hebrew Roots teacher named Monte Judah as the platform from which we’ll launch various excursions into the text of Scripture. Here in part two, we examine Acts 10, Galatians 2, and Acts 15. We also examine two common Hebrew Roots arguments and address five unbiblical burdens the Mr. Judah needlessly places on the shoulders of believers in Yeshua (Jesus).
DONATE TO OUR MINISTRY
TheBiblicalRoots.org/#donate (Thank you!)
OUR LINKS
linktr.ee/rlsolberg
VIDEO LINKS
Clean & Unclean by Monte Judah
• Episode 10 | Messianic...
Acts 15:21, Hebrew Roots, and the key to the Jerusalem Council
• Acts 15:21, Hebrew Roo...
Acts 15 and the Synagogues
• Acts 15 and the Synago...
New Observations on the four requirements of the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15)
• New Observations on th...
One Law for the Native Israelite and the Foreigner?
• Was the Law of Moses g...
Full text of Spurgeon's Sermon "The Clean and the Unclean"
www.spurgeon.org/resource-lib...
CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction to Part 2: What we’ll cover
01:41 Acts 10: Peter’s Vision
13:28 Galatians 2: Separating from the Gentiles
23:00 Acts 15: Don’t Eat Blood
26:55 Argument #1: Cut-and-Paste Theology (Cherry Picking)
30:58 Argument #2: Kosher was for Gentiles
34:27 Five unbiblical burdens from Judah:
39:13 - #1) Not kosher? God doesn’t listen to your prayers
40:00 - #2) Not kosher? You follow other gods
41:09 - #3) Not kosher? You won’t love God and others
42:03 - #4) Not kosher? No fellowship for you
43:19 - #5) Not kosher? You’re not really saved
46:50 Wrap it up, Solberg
49:55 Excerpt from sermon by Charles Spurgeon (1863)
Subtítulos disponibles en español
Esta es la parte 2 del examen bíblico más completo que jamás hayamos hecho en este canal sobre por qué los seguidores de Jesús no están obligados a comer bíblicamente limpio o kosher. Vamos a profundizar en la Torá y los Evangelios y más, rastreando el hilo de los mandamientos de Dios sobre la comida. Y vamos a usar un video de un maestro de raíces hebreas llamado Monte Judah como plataforma desde la cual lanzaremos varias excursiones al texto de las Escrituras. Aquí, en la segunda parte, examinamos Hechos 10, Gálatas 2 y Hechos 15. También examinamos dos argumentos comunes de raíces hebreas y abordamos cinco cargas no bíblicas que el Sr. Judá coloca innecesariamente sobre los hombros de los creyentes en Yeshua (Jesús).
My grandpa and Monte Judah used to work, they used to teach together, they used to spend a lot of time. You are right about cookie cutter arguments, I was trained more so in these then I was in the actual truth of God's word. Thank you brother for providing commentary on these things! God has used your ministry with me, thank you! To God be the glory!
Thank you for sharing that, Jesse. God is so good!
RLS
Watching this while I eat a ham and bacon sandwich in freedom with Jesus:). So thankful for our freedom and salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ and that our salvation doesn’t depend on our own works! Lord please help Mr. Judah to see the truth of Your Word, Your grace and mercy.
Amen. In these times, I'm thankful for what God provides. Many go to our local food bank, they have to eat whatever is given. They're thankful. Should they starve their children, or cook the bacon? 🥓🍳
As for me and my house, we're going to eat and be thankful.
Thank you for opening up my eyes. I have been going down the road of torahism and felt uneasy thinking all Christians who dont follow Torah are doomed. Im turning back to Jesus thanks to you brother. God Bless 🙏🏽✝️
So your okay with the pagan holidays in Christianity and pagan sun worship on Sunday. I'm guessing if u followed torah u must know this?
@@yeshuahamashiachservant8165
Here’s the thing. God created all the days. Just because someone worships God on the first day of the week and once long ago someone else worshiped the sun, it doesn’t mean that that person does too. That logic is from leading questions, not from reality. God made the sun. I don’t avoid the sun or wear sunglasses to shield my eyes from the sun because people worshiped it long ago. I worship God alone. To the pure all things are pure. Walk in the liberty wherewith Christ has made you free.
Good for you. All we need is Jesus.
Man... I wish I could be as gerenous as you are in your gentleness in dealing with teachers like Judah. I am no where near as charitable as you in the words I have to describe them. So thankful for your work here, Solberg. You definitely lift a lot of the burden, and are definitely more thorough about these topics than I have the patience for. Thank you!
I second that! It is truly difficult for me to be as gracious as you are, Rob, yet I do feel the pulling and tugging of the Holy Spirit to walk in the Spirit and not in the flesh. I face this daily, for the past 6 years and I am exhausted of it. Thank you Lord for your continual grace towards me. Help me to give Your grace to others. Amen!
@GoodGodFatherGGF @Iamlainylaine That means a lot to me. Thank you! God is good because I don't feel nearly as patient as you give me credit for. I feel that frustration, too! It must be the Holy Spirit "editing" my raw reactions that allows these videos to come across in a fairly reasonable tone.
I try to think of Hebrew Rooters as people who love God but are in a temporary state of delusion and will one day come to their senses. So my job is not only to make a theological defense against their claims and the damage they are causing in the body of Christ but try to do so "with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame" (1 Peter 3:15-16).
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots praying for the Spirit to continue to give you that strength, patience and understand, by the grace of Christ. Shalom!
@@scented-leafpelargonium3366
Well said!👍
Amen! Lord help me in this@@TheBiblicalRoots ✝
I'm so glad you put Part 2 out right away. I was pacibg the floor waiting for it.
I have used your teaching to persuade my HR friends to unhook from the Judaizers.
Thank you!
So when Jesus returns will He be eating anything unclean!??
One needs to read and understand Isaiah 66:17-24 to find the answer
There in Isaiah 66 it talks about Jesus and His thoughts.
There's a declaration made in verse 17-24 that you need to be aware of to survive in the eternal kingdom!
@@qw2ps4God himself created all things, are you attempting to say that God can be defiled by His own creation? If that’s so, you believe in a VERY small not all powerful God. That’s a pretty bold statement
Wow! I thought part 1 was thorough, insightful, and great! Part 2 is even better! Thank you, Professor Solberg, for these videos, really driving the focus on scriptural truth and messiah Yeshua! He is the summation and fulfillment of the Law. We are now to listen to and hear Him. (Reference to the transfiguration). Kefa was allowed to see this event, too. What a stubborn dude. He wanted to erect tabernacles for Moses and Elijah (the Prophets), but the voice said, "No! This is my beloved son. Hear Him"!. Thank Adonai for all He has given us through His son! Thanks again, professor! May God anoint, fill, and empower you in truth and continual union with Him through Yeshua! Amen! Keep up your pursuit of scriptural truth and putting the work you do in these videos!
Great video! Thanks for taking on this issue head on by using Monte Judah's own teachings.
He has several more videos on teachings for Christians which try to shame us into becoming messianic. I would love to see you debunk these other teachings using Mr Judah's own words. It would be a help to Christians to defend the faith and to deliver the HRM followers from the great deception.
Thanks again for your in-depth bible study
Thank you for this! The idea that, according to Monte Judah, "we need to turn back to Moses," is what turned me off. I'd rather know and be in Christ than be someone who says that "I'm a believer in Christ, but His sacrifice isn't enough. I have to be bound to the Law of Moses, too." Give me Jesus because He died and was raised for my sins. Moses never did that.
Amen!
He died for your sins. He was raised for your life.
Awesome video and this Christian will always follow what jesus taught. And his word and teachings as you explained is very clear. Its all about Jesus. not about us or what we eat. I will also pray for teachers and fellow Christians. That want to mislead others. And down play Jesus. Just a sad thing to see. God bless all and keep you. Keep up the great work for our God good sir.
This is near us in Oklahoma. I was not aware of him. Thank you. I have shared this video with my community in multiple towns.
for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.
Romans 14:17
Oh wow a part 2? Let’s go 🤩
My brother you did exactly what Jesus us to do today.
You have open our eyes my dear I will be praying for you all the time 🙏.
What i enjoy about this TH-cam Channel. Is a detail Intelligent point of view. I disagree with most of what he is saying. But I enjoyed hearing his pont of view. It is not just a quick comment. But was something that he took time to consider.
That means a lot to me, sir. Thank you.
Shalom, Rob
@RLSolberg I have seen a lot of debates. I have seen people get angry and mad at each other. I have debated people individually.
What I have learned is that the best thing that we can do is listen.
It is not so important that somebody disagrees with us. What is more important is understanding the reason why they disagree with us.
As an example, somebody who is racist. I have found that they are not really racist. They just don't want to get the short end of the stick. And I don't blame them.
Thank you so much for your videos, it has helped us understand the Bible more clearly as we are trying to understand our loved one who is HR. We have learned so much and know we are on the right path ❤
Amen.
The hate in Judah’s speech…hurts my heart. It’s the same way my husband spoke to me…our home is now broken because the abuse became so bad…the root is not HRM, the root is brokenness, pride, and need for control…These people need prayer for their eyes to be opened, conviction of sin, and to be set free from this false teaching…
You can find healing ✌️
What sin do they need conviction of?
Disbelief
@@theomegawerty9688, Judah’s attitude is sinful and abusive…it’s also abuse of scripture, which in turn is used to abuse others, like myself…
@IMS7610 I would agree there, I jsut mean the crux of their issues is they don't believe in the finished work of Jesus
Yes and amen!
Solberg, thanks again for what you do for the body 😁
Have you done (or can you do) a video on the weaponizing of Isaiah 66?
The Lord never said the church would be set apart like Israel! We are to be salt and light! Salt does no good if you keep it in a cabinet- or put your light under a basket… that’s how I see it!✝️🙏
The relationship between the people of God in the Old Testament and the people of God in the New Testament is better described in terms of an organic development rather than either separation or replacement. The true Israel of the Old Testament became the nucleus of the true church on the day of Pentecost. The important point to notice is that God does not cut the old tree down and plant a new one (replacement theology)
@@salpezzino7803 I don’t believe in replacement theology!
@@deespence8629 Ok, there is a difference between the Nation of Israel and the True Israel.
Of you want to be with The Almighty YHWH in eternity, you will attend Sabbath on Saturday, you'll cease eating what our ABBA has said is an abomination to even touch it. YESHUA didn't declare all foods clean. If He had, people didn't view pork or any seafood as food. If YESHUA had specified that these items could now be eaten, the Pharisees would have had been back with an an angry crowd and the proper authorities. The Apostles would have recoiled in shock and horror, gotten up and just.
@@VikTorahYAH if you wish to put yourself under the law- just remember you must keep ALL of the law- not just what you pick and choose. I am a gentile- I was never under the mosaic law. The law will condemn you if you break even a small part of it. I am under grace. This does not mean I can do whatever I please. I follow JESUS! He is my everything! Everything was made for Him and through Him! I worship Jesus through spirit and truth!I am a born again spirit filled Christian!
Also in Acts 11: 2,3 the circumcision party criticized Peter by saying that he went to uncircumcised men & ate with them.
Mathew 15, in particular verse 11. Amen!
Acts 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Hello Brother, Just want to say thank you for making this Channel on the Hebrew root movement,
(I know they go by different names as well)
I had a friend recently invited me to a Bible study I haven’t seen him for so long but just by our conversation we had I was thinking it was a actual “Christian Bible study” After the second Bible study it was leading more to the Hebrew roots movement/ Torah keepers, He was talking a lot about keeping the Sabbath, about not eating pork and watching what to eat because it can be unclean, Not attending a Christian church and etc.. so I asked him respectfully so you’re telling me if I eat any type of pork I’ll be sinning… he told me point blank yes!
If you did something that the father told you not to do would that be What's your name? Without be sin?
If you did something that Jesus told you not to do it, would that be sin?
@@achristianconvertedtochris5862 Not sure what you mean.
@@agustinrodriguez5058 If you do something that the father. Told you not to do. Is that not sin.
@@achristianconvertedtochris5862 I see what your trying to do but no amount of law-keeping was good enough because the problem is the human heart. Jesus went on to illustrate how bankrupt their understanding of the law was by making comparison after comparison (you have heard that it was said. . . but I tell you; Matthew 5:21-22). For example, the Pharisees’ teaching implied that if a man avoided having sex with someone other than his spouse, then he had kept that portion of the law. Jesus, understanding the universality of human lust, filled the law out to the full by pointing out God’s original intention-because adultery is a matter of the heart, people regularly commit this sin through a single moment of lust in the mind.
A careful examination of the remainder of the Sermon on the Mount reveals that virtually every point Jesus made draws a contrast between the pseudo-righteousness of the religious leaders and the true righteousness that God desires. The person who discovers and appropriates true righteousness will manifest the character qualities described in the Beatitudes (Matt 5:3-12) and will impact the world as described in Matt 5:13-16. The Pharisees did not.
Jesus drew attention to the gravity of his foundational premise with the formula, I tell you. He equated himself with the author of Scripture which, of course, he was. Jesus insisted his words bore all the authority of God himself which, of course, he was. Jesus claimed deity for himself.
Jesus was essentially declaring war on the false pharisaical religion. He insisted that no person could be saved by his or her own righteousness. This was something the law intended to indicate all along, but Israel had missed the point (Rom. 2:17-3:31; Gal. 3:17-29; 5:3-6). The point was hard for the self-righteous to swallow-no one, not even the super law-keeping Pharisees, could enter into heaven. All needed a Savior! Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior not Law keeping. Please read the Galatians as well, May Lord God be with you.
Thank you for these videos! Are you familiar with Tom Bradford?
Great study! I mostly agree with everything. As formerly being in HR I would caution saying that food laws are "manmade". They were made by God but apart of a different covenant. I really appreciate these videos though and find them very helpful!
Thanks, David. I don't believe I referred to the food laws as "man-made." If I did, it was unintentional and I want to correct the record: the food laws were given by Yahweh to Israel! I referred to "manmade obligations," meaning the kosher food laws under the New Covenant are not something God requires. But if I didn't articulate that very clearly, my apologies!
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRootsThat's how I understood you.
🙏
Rob, just watched it again! I have one question and one observation, and would like your response.
Question: When Peter received the order the first time to “arise Peter, kill, and eat!”, What might have happened if Peter tried to do that?”
Observation: So the Lord Himself caused this “sheet” to descend from the sky(heavens), and then it returned back up there? One would think UNCLEAN animals would not be welcomed up there! I can already hear what the Torahists will say!! What say you?
Hello Prof. Solberg. I hope all is well with you. I may have missed this in your video but I am curious as to how you came to the conclusion that the meals Jesus and Peter were eating, were kosher? Thanks!
Great question, Tekantor. I conclude that Jesus only ate clean ("kosher") food during His earthly life because He was born under the law (Gal. 4:4), and He was sinless (2 Cor. 5:21). I'm not sure which meal you're talking about Peter eating? Sometimes it was kosher, sometimes not!
Blessings,
Rob
I would love to see you provide commentary on "everyday Tora".
Hi, Jesse. What is "Everyday Torah"?
RLS
Howdy brother Solberg. "Everyday Tora" is the TH-cam channel that represents the Hebrew roots sect known as the "restoration ministries". They are an off shoot of "lion and lamb ministries ". Here is the link for their TH-cam channel:
Thank you brother. God is using your ministry In my life.
I’m not sure if you made a video on this but if you haven’t, may you make a video talking about the passages that suggest animal sacrifices will happen during the 1000 year reign? Thank you, I recently found your channel it has been helpful. ALSO, I don’t understand Isaiah 56:6-8, it says:
“ “And the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord,
to minister to him, to love the name of the Lord,
and to be his servants,
everyone who keeps the Sabbath and does not profane it,
and holds fast my covenant-
7 these I will bring to my holy mountain,
and make them joyful”
Does this mean we have to keep the Sabbath?
Wow that sounds like the cult i left in the 90s......
Im amazed in Montes teachings.
Self professed teachers
Was it WWCOG? I was in that one.
@@glenmorse9533 Unfortunately not, the one i was in was a little more destructive.
@@jamestom2510 Was it JW? just curious, no matter though, none of them will ever deliver salvation to anyone.
@@glenmorse9533 no, your getting colder…lol
@@jamestom2510 OK, I give up LOL
Hi! From Your teachings i learned a lot recently. In regard of clean and unclean food can You leave here some comments on Isaiah 66:17? Thank You!
Lately I heard an argument concerning questioning in the meat market: In whole Israël there was no pork available at the meat market.... But Paul was talking to the Corinthians (gentiles). Well I do not know the right answer. Does anyone has?
Hi, Gerda! Yes, you are correct that Paul was writing to the church in Corinth, which was not part of Israel but in a pagan, gentile area. But even the land of Israel at that time was a province run by the Roman government. So even meat markets within the land of Israel presumably would have included "non kosher" meats.
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots the moment I posted I thought of the Romans. Thanks for confirming.
Blessing to you to. You are really an answer to my prayer. I asked, Lord send someone who is well educated in this subject.
I wonder if you could please do a teaching (if you haven't already ) on Torah'ism that teaches that it's not a salvation issue, but that we just won't rule with Christ in the millennial kingdom because it's only those who obey ALL His commandments, which hooked me.
And on another note I noticed the word says that in the new millenium only the feast of Tabernacles will be required which seems intriguing and that animal sacrifice will be reinstated which blows my mind 😮. Any thoughts on that?
Will there be a part 3 of this series with Monte Judah or was this the final one?
Hi, Brandon. There are just two parts of this clean/unclean teaching.
Shalom, RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots My brother you are wrong with your breakdown of Acts 10. This is not talking about food. If you read further Peter didn't understand the vision and thought on it. The vision was preparing Peter to accept and teach non jews as you read in Acts 10:28.
@@brucepayton6322 Hey, Bruce! There are three significant problems with the idea that Peter’s vision in Acts 10 was only about Gentiles and had nothing to do with food. First, the vision was _literally about food._ Jesus told Peter to eat the animals. Second, on what basis are we willing to allow for a change on the issue of people but not food? That’s completely arbitrary. Third, if the vision of the food was solely intended as a metaphor for the Gentiles, then Jesus was using a false analogy. He essentially said, “Look, I know in this vision I’m telling you that all food is now clean, but that’s not true. It’s just an example to show you that you can hang out with Gentiles now.” No, God does not use false metaphors. Food and people are tightly linked in the Torah (See Lev. 20:25-26). This is how Peter knew (without being told) that a vision that was _only_ about food signaled a change in the status of people as well.
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots OK, so I am not going to give my own interpretation of Acts 10:28, I'll let the text speak for itself. But I will go to Isaiah 66:15-17. This is an end times prophecy that has not happened yet. These are some of the people that the Lord will destroy.
Isaiah 66:15-17 For, behold, the Lord will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire. 16 For by fire and by his sword will the Lord plead with all flesh: and the slain of the Lord shall be many. 17 They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst, eating swines flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the Lord.
This is absolute proof that the Lord will consume those that eat swines flesh and other abominations. And again, this is an end times prophecy that the Lord will fulfill.
@@brucepayton6322
The problem with this stolberg is hes all in on his interpretation!
He's wrote a book he needs to sell in order to make a living.
If he admitted to the truth he'd have to scrap his book in which he'd lose his money!
It tells us near the end about false teachers and their desire for money. Unfortunately it will lead to a bitter end for all who fall for their error!
My confidence is in Christ, not my ham and cheese sandwich.
Great video! Thank you for covering this topic.
Can you answer this question sometime: one HR argument is that the OT calls pork "an abomination" the same way it calls homosexuality "an abomination." And we dont advocate homesexuality obviously. How would you address this?
Thanks! I would probably point out that the prohibitions against homosexuality are repeated and endorsed in the NT, while the food laws are overturned. So Christians aren't making an arbitrary distinction, they're following what Scripture says. Blessings, Rob
so in the new heavens and new earth pork turns into an abomination but now it is ok? really????@@TheBiblicalRoots
@@TheBiblicalRoots The kosher law was never overturned. It's pretty obvious that this is your own opinion because none of the apostles ever told anyone, Gentile or otherwise, that they were free to eat whatever they want.
Yes they did. Repeatedly.
“Everything created by God is good and is to be received with thanksgiving”. Is pork created by God?
A lot like the Seventh Day Adventist line of thought:
• If you love me, keep my commandments
• The OT says not to eat pork
• If you eat pork, you’re not following God’s commandments
• Hence, you don’t love God
• --> You are NOT a Christian and are going to hell
Great logical reasoning.
No _food_ that God _created to be received_ is to be rejected, because it is set apart by two things: 1) Word of God and 2) prayer. God's word (term used by Paul for the Old Testament) does not set apart unclean animals as 'food'. 'God's word' specifically says God will destroy those eating pigs flesh, rats, and the abomination (lobsters, shrimp, crab, oysters, etc.) when He comes in flaming fire (second coming).
Let me ask you this: Did God create pigs, rats, lobsters, shrimp, crabs, and oysters?
"Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons...who...require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For *_everything created by God is good,_* and *_nothing_* is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer." (1 Tim 4:1-5)
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots God created everything. God did not create every creature to be food. Look closer at the 1 Timothy 4 passage you and I both referenced.
"For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with gratitude; for it is sanctified by means of: 1) the word of God and 2) prayer."
Unclean animals were not sanctified by the word of God as food.
Leviticus 11:47
'to distinguish between the unclean and the clean, and between the animal that may be eaten and the animal *_that may not be_* eaten.'
I think Jesus was pretty CLEAR... If you love me keep my commandments , he didn't mention exempting the dietary laws!! He also said [DON'T THINK] I am come to destroy the law . He didn't come to sift out the law.
I teach and believe that obedience is God’s “love language.” Jesus said, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15). And I'm sure you would agree that not every command that God has given applies to every person at all times. Some of His commands only apply to certain people (i.e., men, women, parents, Levitical priests) or for certain times (i.e., building an ark, gathering manna, while in exile). And I'm sure you would also agree that we are each only expected to keep the commands of God that apply to us. The NT teaches that the ceremonial Mosaic commands do not apply to Christians today. (ex. Repeated blood sacrifices for sin are no longer required (Heb 10:18).) We still serve God and obey His commands, “But now we are released from the law, having died with Christ to that which held us captive, so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code” (Rom 7:6).
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots "I teach and believe that obedience is God’s “love language.” Jesus said, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15)."
That would include the dietary laws as well.
God's law represents dos and don't s on how he wants to be loved . Whether you want to comply with that is between you and him.
"And I'm sure you would agree that not every command that God has given applies to every person at all times."
If you ( Jew , Greek , Gentile ,heathen ,bond , free , circumcision , uncircumcision ..etc)
are in a Covenant with the father . Every commandment , all the time.
I also believe in the different levels of understanding: I believe the commandments are literal and figurative as well . The literal definition for man : is Male and female. I also believe , I am the bride of Christ, who is my groom .
"The NT teaches that the ceremonial Mosaic commands do not apply to Christians today."
then You will deny this..
1Co 5:7
Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
1Co 5:8
Therefore let us keep the feast, (Passover)
not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
referring : to mat 15, mark7 (Judaism is sin)
Rom 7:5
For when we were in the flesh,
the motions of sins,
which were by the law,
did work in our members to bring forth fruit to death.
Rom 7:6
But now we are delivered from the law, (Judaism)
that being dead (Luk 11:44, Mat 23:27)
wherein we were held;
that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
Judaism was the transgression , their commandments and ordinance were nailed to the cross , not the law of God
It is finished:
Jas 1:15
Then when lust has conceived,
it brings forth sin:
and sin,
when "it is finished",
brings forth death.(the cross)
Jesus died for his rebellious brothers sin.
Shalom
@@TheBiblicalRoots I compliment you on your studies . You seem to be really dedicated to find truth .This is what I see.
You said the dietary law was for only Israel in the O.T.
Hear : shemah- observe and do !!
Exo 12:49
One law shall be to him that is home born, (and to the stranger) that sojourns among you.
Num 15:16
One law and one manner shall be for you, (and for the stranger) that sojourns with you.
Home born and stranger (mixt multitude) would prolly define Israel
Eze 36:26
A new [heart] also will I give you,
and a [new spirit will I put within you]:
and I will take away the stony heart
out of your flesh,
and I will give you an heart of flesh.
I find really, really interesting:
look it up !!
Heart:
לֵב lēḇ : authority of the house
[Beginning] of torah:
Gen 1:1 first letter of the first hebrew word
בְּרֵאשִׁית
[בְּ]
[End] of torah:
Deu 32:52 Last letter of last word:
Israel:
יִשְׂרָאֵל
[ל]
I am the Beginning and the end.
The heart contains/ distributes the blood to the body ;
He gave us all his heart ,
not just part of it
what in the mist of his heart : torah/love.
He redeemed us with his blood.
This ONLY happens at Passover
By faith the Israel /mixt multitude kept Passover they were redeemed .
first commandment :
shemah hear: observe and do
shalom
@@raditian2
old leaven is:
Halacha: Jewish law and jurisprudence, based on the Talmud.: "the Rabbi will discuss current topics in Halacha "according to the Halacha".
Definition of halacha: the body of Jewish law supplementing the scriptural law and forming especially the legal part of the Talmud.
The Law of Moses and the halacha
A Case in point when gentiles hear Jewish law, we think of an ancient archaic law that has lost any relevance to us today. There are two sets of laws, the Law Moses and the halacha (oral tradition) passed down as law. We can read the Law of Moses (Torah) but halacha is the law that teaches oral tradition manmade. Halacha was created at the fall of the first Temple, when they lost the only place that they could make sacrifices
Halacha was not written down until 200AD.
Acts 24:14
14 “But this I do admit to you: I worship the God of our fathers in accordance with the Way (which they call a sect). I continue to believe everything that accords with the Torah, and everything written in the Prophets.
He was talking about the Law that’s written, Torah and Prophets, Halacha was not written down until 200AD.
Matt 23: 1-4
1 Then Yeshua addressed the crowds and his talmidim:
2 “The Torah-teachers and the P’rushim,” he said, “sit in the seat of Moshe.
3 So, whatever they tell you, take care to do it. But don’t do what they do because they talk but don’t act!
4 They tie heavy loads onto people’s shoulders but won’t lift a finger to help carry them.
The heavy load is halacha. At that time not everyone had a copy of the Torah, just Torah-teachers, Pharisees, and the very wealthy, so the interpretation and application of God's Laws had to go through their filters to get to God’s people. Just like today the church has filtered and twisted the truth because it was too Jewish.
Just subscribed to Monte Judah's channel! Thankyou for providing an excellent SCRIPTURAL teacher who teaches TRUTH. I wasn't aware of him. I watched all of his video, and agreed 100%.
LOL!
@@TheBiblicalRoots Real mature Rob.
Lol😂
Either eating biblically clean is easy, like you said it is... Or it's a burden, like you also said it is.
Exactly, t-time! It's a simple matter to choose beef over pork. And at the same time, it's an unbiblical burden to suggest that *not* choosing pork means God won't listen to our prayers and we'll get kicked out of fellowship and we won't be saved (as Mr. Judah teaches). RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I hear that what he said wasn't biblical in terms of the prayers, I don't follow his teachings any case. But, I didn't hear him say, in the clip you shared, that you won't be saved for eating pork. I think that was a misunderstanding of definitions of words between you and him.
I just found your words to be contradicting.
@@TheBiblicalRootsif you dare read Isaiah 66:17..... you might find out what God thinks about eating pig
Professor please explain. Proverbs 28:9 He who turns away his ear from listening (Shama = hear and obey) to the Law (Torah) Even his prayer is an abomination.”
Revelation 21:27 and nothing unclean, and no one who practices abomination and lying, shall ever come into it (the new Jerusalem), but only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life.”
Also, John writes: 1 John 5:3 "For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments; and His commandments are not burdensome."
Once again Rob makes a clear distinction between those that follow Torah today, and those that believe no follower of Jesus is bound to the Commands of the Father. It should be clear that there are two very different Saviors read in the NT; the Catholic Jesus that did away with parts of the Torah for followers, or the Hebrew Yeshua who taught how to keep Torah. After loading all the bases, Rob uses Charles Spurgeon to hit a Grand Slam to close out the teaching. Let’s read what the Preacher Spurgeon thought about celebrating the Catholic feast Christmas in a sermon in 1871. “Certainly we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas: first, because we do not believe in the mass at all, but abhor it,… because we find no Scriptural warrant whatever for observing any day as the birthday of the Savior; and, consequently, its observance is a superstition, because not of divine authority.” Those that follow the true God of the Scriptures, don’t need Monte or a professor to teach them. Follow the example of the Bereans.
This video of Monte Judah had me shaking my head. The gaslighting is strong with Monte Judah.
It borderline the B.I.T.E. Model
34:30 You will know them by their fruit.
Have you ever covered why God commanded Noah to take 2 of each kind of unclean animal and take 7 of each kind of clean animal. If there were only two of each type of unclean animal obviously you wouldn't be able to eat any of them for some period of time to allow propagation. I would like to hear your opinion on this topic.
read Genesis from chapter 1, you will see that Man only ate plants, then after the Flood God told man, he can eat all animals. So not about food.
Hi Plumber! Interestingly, Gen. 8:20 is the first reference to a sacrificial or worship altar in the Bible. And we know it was not a sacrifice based on the Mosaic Law. Not only because Israel did not yet exist and that Law would not be given until a thousand years after Noah, but also because Noah's sacrifice did not conform to Mosaic standards; it was not performed in Yahweh's Tabernacle by a Levitical priest. In fact, his sacrifice would technically be illegal for Israelites once the Sinai Covenant was given and the Law of Moses put into effect. (However, I believe Noah's sacrifice prefigured the sacrificial commands that would later be formalized in the covenant at Sinai.)
So the designation of "clean/unclean" animals in Genesis does not directly or necessarily invoke the animals that would later be listed in Lev. 11/Deut. 14. Especially since Gen. 9:3 says *_“Every moving thing that lives_* will be food for you.” There may have been an earlier awareness of animals that were appropriate and inappropriate for sacrifice. Or, the Biblical author may have added this detail anachronistically to avert potential contradictions with the law.
Shalom! RLS
From the very beginning Abel and Cane knew what sacrifices were acceptable to YHWH because they had Torah/instruction before Mt Sinai from YHWH. Can't believe anyone believes in a God that allows his creation to guess about what is important to him. All of God’s commands are to be followed when a person is able to, no matter when in history they were given.
@@flyguymt You Cultists have Torah on the brain. You make stuff up. You do understand, not everyone has the IQ of a walnut?
@@flyguymt ps You CAN'T follow All of God’s commands. Miss 1 Damned
I think monte could use a season of fasting and prayer. 😏
Lev Chapter 11 Verse 43 through 47
DO NOT DEFILE YOURSEVLES BY ANY OF THESE CREATURES. DO NOT MAKE YOURSELVES UNCLEAN BY MEANS OF THEM OR BE MADE UNCLEAN BY THEM. I AM THE LORD YOUR GOD;CONSECRATE YOURSELVES AND BE HOLY, BECAUSE I AM HOLY. DO NOT MAKE YOURSELVES UNCLEAN BY ANY CREATURE THAT MOVES ALONG THE GROUND. I AM THE LORD, WHO BROUGHT YOU UP OUT OF EGYPT TO BE YOUR GOD; THEREFORE BE HOLY BECAUSE I AM HOLY. THESE ARE THE REGULATIONS CONCERNING ANIMALS. BIRDS, EVERY LIVING THING THAT MOVES ABOUT IN THE WATER AND EVERY CREATURE THAT MOVES ALONG THE GROUND. YOU MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE UNCLEAN AND THE CLEAN, BETWEEN LIVING CREATURES THAT MAY BE EATEN AND THOSE THAT MAY NOT BE EATEN.
This is the Words of God that he said himself. First let's address this. Are you arguing to define what God said himself. Your trying to define what God has already defined. Its plain and simple for us to understand. And your twisting his words. To ge you to understand what did adam and eve do that the lords commanded them not to do. Eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. And what did God do. Kick them out of the garden and made them work the earth and labor pains. Things that still are happening to today we work the land and woman have labor pains exactly what the lord said in the beginning of time. Proof that when Gods says or does something is not went away it's to be fulfilled. Nothing God said went away with jesus. Bc if that was true you would be a false prophet to what your teaching because you dont know everything that goes with being obedient and disobedient with God and that's something God demands accounting if you go agaisnt what he says. And it's not good.
Things that never happened for 100, Alex
It’s pretty scary that Judah holds those views, and is so quick to condemn people and speak on behalf of Jesus saying He wouldn’t sit with us. That’s a pretty bold claim
Acts 19 is about people not food. That’s what Peter said.
Since unclean animals were never called
“food”
for people there is no reason Peter to lie.
Furthermore when Jesus rose again HE fixed fish on the shore for HIS guys, not pigs.
Forgot to add, John in Rev. 2:20 UPHOLDS a food restriction, not addressed in Acts 15, since Acts 15 does not include all the commandments Gentiles are subject to. For instance, Acts 15 does not address:
Honoring Father & Mother
Stealing
Making graven images
Coveting & more...
Witch Craft
Kidnapping
Attending worship services on Sunday
Donating to support ministries
Is John mistaken according to your theology?
Rev. 2:20
Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and
*to eat things sacrificed unto idols*.
Let us hear your comments on this verse.
BTW
CHILDREN of unbelievers are UNCLEAN according to 1 Cor 7:14
Regarding Peter in Acts 10, why don't you let the Holy Spirit teach you what this vision was about.
GOD HIMSELF showed Peter who has the Holy Spirit, and multiple gifts that it was
MAN not FOOD that should not be considered UNCLEAN:
“God has shown me that I should not call any *person common* or unclean.”
To interpret this verse as referring to food, your are importing YOUR OPINION into the text.
IN THE BEGINNUNG WAS THE WORD AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD; THE WORD WAS GOD. GOD IS PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE. IF GOD IS PAST PRESENT FUTURE YOU BETTER BELIEVE THAT WHAT BE SAID IN THE PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE APPLY IN THE PAST PRESENT AND THE FUTURE. GOD IS THE BEGGINNIG ANF THE END. GOD SET RULES IN THE BEGINNING AND WILL JUDGE REDEEM AND RESTORE IN THE END. SO YOU BETTER FOLLOW WHAT HE SAYS.
Speaking in all caps doesn’t make your argument better. It shows emotionality. Weakness the loud person usually has a problem. Anyway. How many laws do you keep? Also I’m not saying God did or didn’t change anything. But if he wants to. He can. Just like he can change his mind on how to respond to someone. Also. Israel. Is not the church. The church. Is gentile and Jewish believers. Israel is the Jewish people. The word is very clear that despite unbelief of some. The Jewish people are still Gods chosen people. We non Jews got Jesus sacrifice because the Jews (mostly) rejected him. No Jew or Greek. Also says no male or female. Gender still exist. So does ethnic distinctions. The church. Is not Israel. Gentiles are blessed by the sacrifice of the lord. Through the Abrahamic covenant. Not. The mosaic covenant. There are certain laws that apply to all. And some that apply specifically to the Jewish people. “Unclean. To. You.” Who was you? Those under the mosaic covenant. The Jewish people. There were non Jews too. Ok. Proselytizes? Or foreigners? That makes a difference.
@@thomasmarchese2808 all caps is just to get your attention. If you listen then you listen and if not then you dont but you dont have to be bloodline of jewish or Israeli descent you have to believe in him and his word and his ways 100 percent you have to turn away from evil ways and then your saved and you have to keep all his commandments and laws not matter what. It all matters what's God thinks at the end of the day or your life God will judge us and God will serve his judgement no one else. Is it wrong to follow all of what God says. I may not me a priest or rabbi but I want to do everything Gods way. He says dont lean on your own understanding well that's a big eye opener for me bc if I did I wouldnt be where I'm at today with the Lord. I would keep wanting to learn more or understand more of his word and ways then when I was a kid learning in bible school. I would to have a understanding of God and his ways like it's actually supposed to be understood.. and you know the Israel and hamas/Hezbollah war going on rn ezekiel 38 and 39 told about this happening. Let me know if you need any help understanding anything about the bible
@@thomasmarchese2808 I hope everyone understands that if you content on being content that's okay but theres more people in the world that you think that will always want more of God and crave God and more of his word and ways. I really just depends on your personal walk with you and God. Peace and peace be with you.
Mark 7 is NOT about Kosher, Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for NOT keeping the commandments in that same passage, is He now going to in His next breath tell people to break the commandments. If that is what He meant, there would have been a reaction right there and then. If any Pharisees heard that and understood it that way that could have arrested Him right there and then. You have to put your social and cultural leanings and your pre-cocnceived learnings in the bin, but too many people dont have the humility to do that.
1 Thes 4:7-8 (NKJV) “For God did not call us to uncleanness, but in holiness. 8 Therefore he who rejects this does not reject man, but God, who has also given us His Holy Spirit.” Emphasis added, and if your interested the OT will teach you about uncleanness.
1 Thes 4:4-5 (NIV) “that each of you should learn to control your own body in a way that is holy and honorable, 5 not in passionate lust like the pagans, who do not know God;” Emphasis added and in this unfortunate case, the word “pagans” in v.5 is used by the scholars, but in other translations is translated as Gentiles. Also Depending on what version you read, again it may not be such a good idea to only identify as a gentile because, in 1 Cor 12:2 (NASB) “You know that when you were pagans, you were led astray to the mute idols,…” Emphasis added and the word for “pagans” is normally translated as Gentiles. So are Christians gentiles or pagans? I guess it depends what side of the bed the scholars woke up on that day to choose how the Greek word “ethnos” is translated.
IS THE VISION OF PETER A TEMPTATION YO BE WARRY OF OR A MARK OF GOD NOW CONTRADICTING HIMSELF?
Deuteronomy 13:1-5 ASV
If there arise in the midst of thee a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and he give thee a sign or a wonder, [2] and the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; [3] thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or unto that dreamer of dreams: for Jehovah your God proveth you, to know whether ye love Jehovah your God with all your heart and with all your soul. [4] Ye shall walk after Jehovah your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. [5] And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death, because he hath spoken rebellion against Jehovah your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed thee out of the house of bondage, to draw thee aside out of the way which Jehovah thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put away the evil from the midst of thee.
It's so sad... Paul, Barnabas, Peter and all the Galatians in Antioch were unclean according to mr.monte...forever in heaven now, but considered unclean.... certainly there must be a type of ' purgatory ' in heaven so they can cleanse themselves, else it would be 'like hell, but not as bad of course.... Paul should have known better than to teach barnabas, Peter and the rest of the believers at Antioch to break the commandments ( Galatians 2 11-21) 😢 😭
there are much better reasons not to like Torahism which I have not see at all, but everyone has their own twist.
WHICH JESUS?
THE GODLY JESUS OR THE JESUS OF IDOLATERS
If you think you got a golden ticket to heaven and dont have to follow what the creator of heaven says himself then your gonna be sadly mistaken. God told moses himself what animals are clean and unclean. Unclean makes us unholy. God is holy and wants us to be holy. He also knows what best for us so we better do what he says. You realize in the bible in parenthesis (jesus declared all food clean) a man had put that bc it was his opinion. Not gods words himself. You only pick and choose what you follow.
PLEASE READ ACTS 10 FOR YOURSELF AND THEN READ ACTS 11 TO SEE TE REACTION OF THE OTHER BROTHERS THAT DID NOT GO WITH PETER TO CORNELIUS HOUSE . AS A JEW YOU COULD NOT GO THERE , BUT PETER EXPLAINED THAT GOD SHOWED HIIM THAT THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO KNOW TRUTH ABOUT THE GOSPEL. DEAR FRIENDS . PLEASE READ AND STUDY FOR YOURSELVES , GOD HELP YOU TO TAKE CARE OF YOUR BODY THAT IS THE TEMPLE OF GOD .AMEN
If clearly dont understand anything that God said. Or any of his word. Have you ever read the old testament. Lev 11 :43 - 47 puts everything you send to be false.
You realize Gods ppl aren't born of Israel blood or generation. Its ppl who believe in him and follow his commandments his remnant living through us. You never read that even though they are some ppl who say they follow God and think they Do God says otherwise read first 3 chapter of revelation and hopefully your eyes will be opened and your heart not hardened like pharaohs bc we all know how that went.
Your prediction is right, we shouldn't make the bible say something it doesn't, Peter's vision wasn't signifying that all foods were made clean, if that were the case he would've stated it, the vision wasn't about food at all, you read that into the bible.
The Holy Spirit could instruct Peter to go to a Gentiles house but not instruct him regarding all things being made clean? Very interesting.
Galatians 2:12 isn't dealing with eating the unclean thing but association with Gentiles, and food sacrificed to idols.
Nowhere in the bible does it say we can eat all things now and it mean the unclean thing, even in Genesis 9:3 the key phrase is "even as the green herb", can we eat the poisonous herb?
The things written in Acts 15:20 are taken straight from the Torah in Leviticus 17,18 and 19, but maybe we don't have to honour our mother and father anymore, or maybe we can worship idols since they're not listed.
The new testament DOES NOT TELL US ALL THINGS ARE CLEAN AND FOOD NOW, that's something man reads into the bible that's not there, if anyone can show me where Christ says he's made all things CLEAN or even that he said he's done away with the law, I won't be able to deny it.
Food is not made holy by praying for it but by the word of God, he only made certain things holy and he told us to eat those things and be holy - Leviticus 11:44-47, if every creature is good in the sense you're making it, then cannibalism is okay, that's a dangerous stance to take.
Followers of Jesus wouldn't have to be told to eat biblically, they already knew to do it, they would have to be told not eat biblically anymore, as the command has already been given.
I will give Monte this, if you're not following his law and commandments, you can't be a believer of him, nor is his spirit in you, once you receive the spirit by faith, the spirit will cause you to walk in those things - Ezekiel 36:27; 1 John 3:24.
Those who break God's commandments and teach men to do so, will not inherit the kingdom of God, and I don't say that with a hateful heart.
In Acts 10:28 and again in v.34 (2x), Peter says the vision was about not calling any man unholy or unclean. Adding anything more to this Spirit lead conclusion is basic eisegesis, and that is a very bad practice.
The sheet of animals was related to food just as much as Abraham sacrificing Isaac was about human sacrifice.
In Acts 15:19-21, the 4 requirements for the gentiles turning to YHWH, were the “starter pack” from the Law of Moses/Torah, so nothing new here. Still required to follow Torah and hear Moses preached on Sunday, whoops I meant 7th day Shabbat. Faith comes by hearing the words of God.
As for Torah/YHWH words causing divisions in families and churches, as sad as they are, what did Yeshua say about the truth he preaches: Matthew 10:34-36 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’..”
Starter pack.
Still starting out over 4 1/2 years later in Acts 21. 🤷🏼♀️
The argument about “native born and sojourners” simply doesn’t work logically in my opinion - 99% of the world’s Christian population does not live in Israel or somewhere among a high concentration of religious Jews. For example, in the city where I grew up less than 1% of population are Jews (and majority of them are secular). That would be very far from reality to label Christians like me to be “sojourners among Israelites”.
For those that think no food can defile you now in this church age, consider the end time rebukes about eating things sacrificed to idols that is given by Jesus to two of the churches in the book of Revelations. Remember, this if right from the mouth of your Savior.
Revelation 2:14,16a “But I have a few things against you, because you have there some who hold the teaching of Balaam, who kept teaching Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols…16 Therefore repent…”
Revelation 2:20 “But I have this against you, that you tolerate the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and leads My bond-servants astray so that they commit acts of immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols.”
Have you heard of Islamic Halal meat? You could possibly be eating out of ignorance meat consecrated to the idol Allah today for lunch or dinner. You figure it out, does what you put in your mouth matter to your God? Jesus tells these believers to repent.
Yes because that is participation in the table of demons. Not the table of gentiles which the unclean food laws refer to. We are now allowed to participate in all human fellowship. Not demonic fellowship
Go rise up, kill and eat. - God
People who just don't get it:
🤪 Totally means people only
People who get it:
😳 For all that's holy, What's wrong with you son?!
List of believers going to hell for eating something:
Be thankful for whatever is before you.
No one is willing to show me where unclean animals are refered or defined as Food and where the term for food is interchangeable with the term for Animals/ beast or Living things
In Acts 10 Peter had never eaten unclean animals as food !
How? yet it is Peter who instructed Mark to record Mark 7:19 ? That all animals were now clean.
It doesn't make sense.
Professor, So you claim from Acts 10, Peter Started eating Pork, and any other unclean animals but forgot that in Acts 15 where he and other apostles wrote to Gentiles to abstain from Certain food.
Sorry Peter
Jesus said its not what you eat that makes you unclean!
So then we have Christians thinking we can eat anything, when God clearly defines what food is!
So Christians ignore The Father, thinking Jesus changed His law!
This kind of reasoning is why the alphabet people think they're saved!
They'll say because Jesus didn't directly teach against the alphabet agenda .... and because He's all about love, its okay to make love to members of the same sex!
So they .... just like many ""Christians"" ..... change doctrine to suit themselves!
Oh, I am so triggered to anxiety here! I take things to heart, and I am very thoughtful,meaning I am not impulsive in my actions.
In the list of what God hates...does not mention pork. I know pork being considered an abomination which means disgusting. Ok, I noticed how prideful one gets at the " I don't eat pork, so I am righteous by default" attitude. Which is pretty disgusting too. I get physically sick when my introduction to Torah...my world was one stomach punch after another ( this is my experience) woman was put here to serve their husbands, but are pretty much dependent on their husbands for their salvation.Women are so wicked, it's not good to even allow them to choose the paint color for the kitchen. Give them an inch, they will take the entire road! " the bible has nothing good to say about a woman" quoted from Pastor Charles Dowell, Straightway.
Now, there is on that list I was referring to: the things that God hates. Being a false witness and stirring up conflict.
Just a side note, also these wicked women, boy they sure liked to collect them as wives and concubines .
Geez, Hebrew roots just really tried to mess up my relationship with my Savior. But it didn't, and won't.
Sorry guys, I got triggered. 😢 Didn't mean to go off in a ditch.
God changes the definition of food a couple times. (Obviously not poisonous food.)
1. Adam-All Plants
2. Noah+sons-After the flood as a blessing, every living thing that moveth
3. Israel at mount Sinai
4. NT-clarifying 1 Tim. 4:3-5
Pretty specific.
God doesn’t change, but He can definitely do whatever He wants in relation to food including giving different instructions to different people at the times He wants to.
What doesn’t change is morality, which was around from creation, long before the mosaic law. We ALL fall short of Gods’s righteous standard-perfection.
15:23 interesting thing about this angry little bit.. "saved by grace" Christians behave the same way. It's just a different line they use to impose their understanding on others
"For by grace ye are saved, through faith, yet not of yourselves it is the gift of God lest any man should boast"
@@theomegawerty9688and boy does man love to boast, its almost like nothing makes a man happier then to say they are rightous and You are not. Reminds me when Jesus talked about the Pharisee and the sinner coming before God, the Pharisee yjanking God he's not like other sinners or a woman and the sinner banging his chest asking the Lord to have mercy on him a sinner and Jesus said only one went away justified and it wasn't the Pharisee, this judah guy is the Pharisee in this story and he has no clue that's him. Pray for him i say
@adamguy33 indeed. Some modern day "bible teachers" sound almost exactly like this passage when they "preach"
@@theomegawerty9688 thanks, but I wasn't asking for a lesson in Pauline Christianity. I know the verse. Usually uttered by lazy people
@@adamguy33 he might be. Ever stop to think you do it in your own way?
The last supper was not a Seder, it’s “the last supper of Yeshua''. Let’s put some logic to the subject; Yeshua cannot be the Passover lamb and eat it too for He is the lamb without blemish.
Who is the church
All or most denominations that exist today have catholicism as their foundation. The protestant churches cleaned up the catholic beliefs, like putting the ten commands back to its original state, lost the idols in their churches, lost the elaborate and perfected masses and the confessional. But the root of their doctrines is still “catholicism” not the Hebrew root that Paul speaks of.
Removal of the Jewish Faith and culture
The church fathers worked very hard to remove all the Jewishness from the creation of their (new) doctrine that they would teach for almost 2 thousand years. In the first century church, the Romans were killing Jews not because they were believers in Yeshua, but because they were Jews and at the time most believers were Jews, They saw the people of The Way just as just another sect of Judisim. God gave Israel seven appointed times, the Biblical Feast days. Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, Trumpets, Atonement and Tabernacles. The church gave us festivals that are tied to nothing except easter which packs the three spring festivals into two celebrations. Their feasts are: The Feast of Mary, Ascension Thursday, Assumption of Mary into heaven, All Saints’ Day, The Feast of the Immaculate Conception and Christmas the Nativity of Our Lord. I’m not going to try any logic to this because it makes no sense. The protestant took from that mess easter and Christmas so, the protestant kept the fundamental doctrine of catholicism.
Conclusion
Who is the winner here? Of course, it’s the adversary(satan). This is what the Pharisees were doing in Yeshua’s time. They put their Halacha (oral tradition) between God and His people. The founding fathers of the church taught the people a doctrine not of God but of man, then Scripture is twisted to make it fit. To close this is the tip of the iceberg, there is so much more to learn.
If in Yeshua, the Spirt in me is the same Spirt in you and the Spirt knows its own work. First Cor:17-25
For the Messiah did not send me to immerse but to proclaim the Good News - and to do it without relying on “wisdom” that consists of mere rhetoric, so as not to rob the Messiah’s execution-stake of its power. For the message about the execution-stake is nonsense to those in the process of being destroyed, but to us in the process of being saved it is the power of God. Indeed, the Tanakh says,
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise
and frustrate the intelligence of the intelligent.” (Isaiah 29:14, 1 Corinthians 1:14)
Where does that leave the philosopher, the Torah-teacher, or any of today’s thinkers? Hasn’t God made this world’s wisdom look pretty foolish? For God’s wisdom ordained that the world, using its own wisdom, would not come to know him. Therefore, God decided to use the “nonsense” of what we proclaim as his means of saving those who come to trust in it. Precisely because Jews ask for signs and Greeks try to find wisdom, we go on proclaiming a Messiah executed on a stake as a criminal! To Jews this is an obstacle, and to Greeks it is nonsense; but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, this same Messiah is God’s power and God’s wisdom! For God’s “nonsense” is wiser than humanity’s “wisdom.”
Proverbs 9:10 The fear of Adonai is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of holy ones is understanding.
Psalm 51:7-8 True, I was born guilty, was a sinner from the moment my mother conceived me. Still, you want truth in the inner person; so make me know wisdom in my inmost heart.
The point is God's wisdom is not our wisdom, to obtain God's wisdom is to seek it form God but with total trust and submission to His will. You must check your worldly wisdom at the door.
I pray this makes sense to you.
May God bless you and give you understanding. In Yeshua's Name
The church fathers did not work to remove Jewishness. Laughable
You become a false prophet if you teach something with out teaching everything that applies with that. Please read the first 5 books and understand what happens to ppl that did follow what God said. Adam, eve, moses ,aaron, whole generation of slaves that where freed with moses, Aaron's sons , too many examples of what happens when you dont follow Gods commandments. And if you think that doesn't apply now your sadly mistaken
”You are sadly mistaken” is not an argument
@@ThePowerminer11 telling people not to do what God says isnt either. You try to tell God what makes you think you dont have to do what he said. Tell God why. Or show me what verse in the bible says not to do what God himself said to do
Is that an accusation you are making based on one sentence I wrote?@@Cos.....
@@ThePowerminer11 just a observation of what I'm hearing but explain to me then so I inderstand
@@Cos..... I thought the original statement wasn't an argument, since most Christians, hebrew roots or not would agree with it. We all try our best to do what God said, and we know there are consequences for disobedience. But there is disagreement on what applies to us. And the "you are sadly mistaken" does nothing to convince anyone of anything.
Jews and gentiles (one in Christ) can eat together at the same table, AMEN. They cannot get together to break God's commandments.
Do you eat roaches? Rats? Why? Because they are *unclean.*
The reason I don't eat roaches and rats is because that's gross! Not because they are ritually unclean. Under the New Covenant, there are no ritually unclean foods.
Shalom, RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I'm not talking about 'ritually' common foods (clean animals like a cow that have become common by dying on their own, torn by wild beasts, offered to idols), I'm referring to animals that are on the 'unclean' do not eat list.
To open up a can of worms, but don’t eat them of course, Rob mentions nowhere in Scripture is Egypt told to eat clean food. That is not stated directly but might be implied in this passage. Isaiah 19:21 “Thus YHWH will make Himself known to Egypt, and the Egyptians will know YHWH in that day. They will even worship with sacrifice and offering, and will make a vow to YHWH and perform it.” Scriptures teach that some sacrifices will be eaten afterwards, and we should already know that any unclean sacrifices were an abomination. Fear Elohim and draw your conclusions. Don’t disregard that Isaiah prophesies there will be future sacrifices also. Catholic Christianity has lied to you that they have forever been done away with. Try to put those worms back in the can.
THE PROIFOLATARY ABOMINATIONS ANTILAW JESUS OF PAUL IS DIFFERENT FROM THE GODLY LAWFUL JESUS OF THE JEWISH DISCOPLES
This isn't nice, but it looks like Mr. Judah ate a whole pig last night.
what about putting this in context. isn’t that how to interpret scripture? you can make any argument you want if you ignore context. for example, Jesus did not say anything against homosexuals, so that is ok. Jesus did not say anything about no woman preacher so that is ok. My understanding of scripture in context says that peter was being told that gentiles are ok to deal with.
No doubt your biblical knowledge is greater than mine, but you lost my interest when you made a statement "that isn't how God works."
Regarding the scathing rebuke of Monte’s position about eating with disobedient believers, Paul supports Monte’s position. 1 Cor 5:9-13 “I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10 I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, …, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11 But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, an…idolater, or a reviler…-not even to eat with such a one. 12 …Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13 …REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.” A non-Torah follower could be categorized as immoral and an idolater. Remember what Jesus will say to some highly spiritual church members, “Depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matt 7:21-23). The biblical definition of sin is lawlessness (1 John 3:4). Immoral people are those that do not follow God’s will, and because they put other religious practices before His, they would be idolators. That would be this layman’s opinion, but I am not an expert by any means like the professor.
20 To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though *not being myself under the law)* that I might win those under the law. 21 To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. 23 I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings. (1 Cor. 9)
Great passage from Paul . Rob, a solid Messianic should agree with all of the letters Paul wrote. I do find it interesting though that in verses 20,21 many scholars and their different versions of the Bible don’t agree whether to include the parentheses or not to in those verses. We are praying for you Rob.
This is a false teacher. What does this man know that God doesn't know. Does this man have any power to change what God said NO. who is this man to test what God said and try and say that it means the opposite of what he said. You just became a false teacher or what your saying and if you think what your saying is true you saying saying that the God you followed is a false God. The God I know does what he pleases and what he says goes and he is a merciful but jealous God. The one who destroyed sodom and gomorrah the one that brought his ppl out of the egypt. The God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. Read Abraham's story again that's a prime example. God told him to sacrifice his son a command. So abraham followed the Lords and what he said and had done for him and was about to kill his son and God stopped him. Because he did what Gid said God promised his whole descendants will be given land of enemies and they will be blessed because he obeyed him.
The man speaks with such a condemning, scolding tone 😕
You make your argument not even knowing what FOOD is. If it is unclean it is not food. read your bible ALL of it . If you do not understand this basic concept, how do you expect to understand anything? Stop twisting scripture to fit your doctrine.
Actually the definition of "food" is anything that can be eaten. And in the Law of Moses, some food was labeled ritually clean, while other food was labeled ritually unclean. Consider this passage:
“You shall not eat anything that has died naturally. You may give it to the sojourner who is within your towns, that he may eat it or you may sell it to a foreigner. For you are a people holy to the Lord your God" (Deut 14:21).
Animals that died naturally were still food, sojourners could eat them. They were only designated "ritually unclean" to the Israelites.
Shalom, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots
Here you go again instilling this belief that the food that you could give away but not eat themselves actually includes that which is in the unclean category!
He is says not to follow what God said. Because jesus went away with it. Did heaven and earth go away? Well neither did his laws and commandments. If you think God words went way how can he come back to save us if his word goes away. How can anything he says be true if it goes away. You proved yourself to be a false teacher at the highest level.
Hey, Cos! I'm curious. Do you believe the annual animal sacrifices to atone for sin (Lev. 16) have gone away? Or do you think we should still be keeping those sacrifices? RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots Yea. Do you know what that was for atonement was for right.ATONEMENT is to be cleansed from all sins through the lord. You gave a sacrifice to the lord on your behalf to be cleansed from all sins for you and all the members of the community. Because back then not everyone had offerings to give so this was a way to show the lord that you want him to forgive or cleanse you and your community for any and all sin Leviticus chapter 16 verse 33 THROUGH 34 AND MAKE ATONEMENT FOR THE MOST HOLY PLACE, FOR THE TENT OF MEETING AND THE ALTAR AND FOR THE PRIESTS AND ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY. THIS IS TO BE A LASTING ORDINACE FOR YOU: ATONEMENT IS TO BE MADE ONCE A YEAR FOR ALL THE SINS OF THE ISRAELITES.
They were making sure the most holy place the tent of meeting and even the altar were cleansed before the lord. You realize how big that is. To clean stuff used specifically for the Lord. That's why they did that.
If you think your gonna go to heaven with out doing what the lord says to do your sadly mistake and it's bad when your telling ppl not to follow what God says.
@@TheBiblicalRoots yea we should still do what the lord says. Heaven and earth haven't gone away so I know Gods laws and ways haven't either.
@@TheBiblicalRoots you know God is past present and future right the beginning and the end. So how would anything he said be true if it went away?
@@TheBiblicalRoots this is best way to say it. Have you forgotten that Moses didnt step foot into the promise land because he disobeyed God. And he was teaching the commandments. Your teaching the opposite and what do you think is gonna happen to you.
The problem with your interpretation is that God _never said_ the unclean animals had been made into clean animals. He said: *"What* God hath cleansed, that call not thou common." What had God cleansed? God cleansed men. We are not to call believers 'common'.
After his vision, Peter was perplexed as to what the vision meant. Peter didn't suddenly assume it meant unclean animals are food. He pondered the vision and was shown that it was about 'man-kind'. Peter *never* went on to say that unclean animals were now 'food'.
We are to test the spirits to see if they are from God. If we have a vision or a dream that goes against God's word we know it's not from God. Your interpretation gives anyone who has a dream or vision contrary to scripture the ability to say their vision tops scripture. Not so!
Peter never ate unclean animals while Jesus was here on earth in the 30's (the vision took place about three years after Jesus' ascension). Then later in the 90's John wrote "The Revelation of Jesus Christ" in which he spoke about 'Babylon the Great' being the habitation of every *unclean bird.* Unclean bird? Yes, still unclean.
Isaiah tells us the Lord will destroy believers who are eating unclean animals at His future coming. You are leading people astray. You need to study this further.
Hello, Mr. B. Puppies! There are three significant problems with the idea that Peter’s vision in Acts 10 was only about Gentiles and had nothing to do with food. First, the vision was _literally about food._ Jesus told Peter to eat the animals. Second, on what basis are we willing to allow for a change on the issue of people but not food? That’s completely arbitrary. Third, if the vision of the food was solely intended as a metaphor for the Gentiles, then Jesus was using a false analogy. He essentially said, “Look, I know in this vision I’m telling you that all food is now clean, but that’s not true. It’s just an example to show you that you can hang out with Gentiles now.” No, God does not use false metaphors. Food and people are tightly linked in the Torah (See Lev. 20:25-26). This is how Peter knew (without being told) that a vision that was _only_ about food signaled a change in the status of people as well.
Blessings, Rob
I'll debate why this makes you a false teacher.
Rob's a false teacher and hypocrite 100%
Hi Rob, here is another cookie-cutter argument. Acts 10:2,3,22. Cornelius was a devout man, God fearing, was charitable to the people, prayed to God continually, a righteous and
God-fearing man, well spoken of by the entire nation of the Jews. The vision that came to him was at the 9th hour ( the last daily sacrifice of the day ). The scriptural language used
to describe Cornelius clearly painted him as a Torah follower. God - fearing ( kept the commandments) , a righteous man ( kept the Torah ) , ate clean ( the Jews spoke well of him ). The only thing missing….Peter explains to him what Yehoshua had done on the cross
( the 9th hour ), the Holy Spirit fell on him, he was baptized in the name of the Messiah
Yehoshua. Vs. 43 every one who believes ( obeys ) Him has received forgiveness of sins
( transgression of the Torah ). Hebrews 1:6 when He ( Yehoshua ) again brings the first-born
into the land “ And let all the angels of the God worship Him. So here we see that Cornelius
has become a first-born ( he follows Yehoshua and His Torah ). Got Torah Got Truth