well done for demonstrating that the god given energy is everywhere around us and it is absolutely free for all (abundance) to share and wish u the best for sharing your creativity for free for all human beings to see that creativity and humanity go hand in hand and creativity for humanity and not for profit is the way and the future.
This is a really nice set up. You need to increase the gearing which will make your weight fall slower. Other guys done that and got it from a 10mtr drop in 1 min to a 1mtr drop in 10 minutes. then a really efficient alternator made using strong neodymium magnets.
Para que demore mas tiempo en llegar abajo el contra peso en la polea utiliza el polipasto como con 30 poleas, 15 fijas y 15 movil, quizas saques varias horas de energia con esa configuración de engranajes que hicistes
What if instead of small dc motor your install a bigger generator with low rpm and high torque. I might slower the weight fall time and increase the current output.
Es muy simple pero solo para valintes. Se tiene que intercambia pesos de toneladas por 350 amperios con maximo de 3voltios en 1 minutos tiempo maximo, el triunfo es para quienes capturan mas amperaje a bajo voltage. Solo para expertos como yo, energia por gravedad, los dejo de leccion y claves en cada letra, por que yo tengo en funcionamiento, para llenar baterias se nesesita amperios y para elevar voltios de nesesita transformadores fin del informe
Before you get your hopes high, remember, to get 1Kwh you need to hang 3.7T of weight at a 100m height. That's not even factoring in mechanical and electrical losses.
That's not so bad, if you're accurate. Concrete, a cheap material, is 2.5X heavier than water at same volume. (One cubic meter of concrete weighs 5,300 lbs. That's two-thirds of your figure.) Reduce the drop to 50 m to get one-half of your figure, or 0.5 kWh. So now we're at two-thirds of 0.5 kWh of production, or about 0.3 kWh per drop. Assume a small single family home (outside power-hungry USA) uses 3 kWh of electricity each day, so we have 24 hours to create the required energy. So by your figures, we need at least ten drops of a 1m^3 concrete weight in under 24 hours (or one per 2.4 hours) to produce 3 kWh per day. So far, that's quite feasible. Use free/renewable electrical energy to lift the weight each time. I prefer to use (low-tech) collected rainwater to spin a small generator for that, but solar power (fragile, high-tech, expensive, intermittent) is also feasible.
For my suggested setup, I might also install heavy springs under a tracked and latchable platform that receives the weight each time. When unlatched, the sprung platform lifts the weight X meters, thus reducing the energy required to lift/reset the weight. With almost two hours to spare between drops, someone/something can crank down the sprung platform before it receives the weight.
For 3kwh per day, you only need 3 solar panels, a small inverter and a couple of batteries. Compare that to the cost of constructing a load bearing structure 50m high, with a myriad of contraptions and speed reducers.
I don't understand the point of this. You're using the energy in a falling weight to produce a little bit of electricity. Why? It only produces energy until the weight reaches the bottom. Pointless!
@@tims6540 The problem is that people have been trying to use gravity to power things for over 1000 years. Look at Perpetual Motion Machines - same technology. We have the answers to the search for free electric power - Wind, Solar, and Hydro. Gravity is not one of them. I admire the guys workmanship, he has really made a fine machine, except it's not going to make endless electricity. He should focus on something that will achieve what he wants and get his creative energy on something that will work. Maybe he could power his machine by water, and I don't mean the water that's coming from his pump. Stick a water wheel in a flowing river and drive the machine from that. Or a wind turbine.
@@tims6540 The largest power company in NZ, I think it's Meridian, has built several wind farms, so that blows your statement about power companies not funding cheaper alternatives right out of the water. We are generating so much electricity from the wind farms that we are selling some to Australia. Our largest coal-fired power generator is on standby and only used for emergencies. All our electricity is from Hydro, Geothermal, Wind and Solar generators, we only have some diesel generators that are used for emergencies, in Hospitals, etc. We have no Nuclear power stations, of course - NZ is Nuclear-free.
@@tims6540 It's just stupid to say that power companies are suppressing cheap alternative energy sources. The power companies are not stupid either, if they can find a cheaper way to produce power you can be 100% certain that they will be using them - they can still sell the power at the same price and make more money! It is not possible to use gravity - people have been trying that for over 1000 years, it's against the laws of physics.
@@tims6540 That is one of the dumbest things I have ever read. There were a large number of motor companies in the early 1900's, a lot of them before Ford. Henry Ford created his own motor company, he didn't get help from anyone with the greatest influence. Saying that is even more stupid. The electric cars built then weren't very good - slow, with very short range. The Dodge brothers, Louis Chevrolet, Walter Chrysler in the USA, Herbert Austin, Wolseley, Morris, in the UK, Gottleib Daimler, Karl Benz (who built the first car!) and others all just wanted to have a successful business and build cars for people. There were hundreds of different factories making cars in the beginning! And what about Stanley, White and others who built steam cars? No-one of any influence helped them. The British government didn't even want them! Read about the infamous Red Flag Act in the UK! In fact, learn some actual facts about anything before you start spouting nonsense like this.
@@tims6540 BTW, the first car was not electric. The first self-propelled vehicles were made in England (not counting Cugnot's Artillery carriage) and were steam powered. Karl Benz built the first petrol-powered car in Germany, although Gottleib Daimler narrowly beat him with his Einspur, which had only 2 wheels. Benz's Motorwagon, built 1885, was a 3-wheeler. There is a video of a replica on TH-cam. Get your facts right.
![อยู่ได้แล้ว - LIPTA feat. Mirrr [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-9-hpntNym4/mqdefault.jpg)
well done for demonstrating that the god given energy is everywhere around us and it is absolutely free for all (abundance) to share and wish u the best for sharing your creativity for free for all human beings to see that creativity and humanity go hand in hand and creativity for humanity and not for profit is the way and the future.
Thank you sir for the comments , i do appreciate it , bless you .
Muy genial se puede hacer también con engranajes? ¿A cuántas revoluciones va el generador? Gracias
May i know the components of this project, like what is that type of motor, is that steel wire you used for the weight
How much weight is required to produce 1w/10w/100w of electricity???
Dude, that's one of the more beautiful machines I've ever seen. Where did you get those rims? What ARE those for...
Really nice work. Smooth.
Es un proyecto muy bueno. Pero que energía produce? No conozco mucho de electricidad, si el motor fuera más grande que pasaría?
This is a really nice set up. You need to increase the gearing which will make your weight fall slower. Other guys done that and got it from a 10mtr drop in 1 min to a 1mtr drop in 10 minutes. then a really efficient alternator made using strong neodymium magnets.
Thank you sir for the comments , i do appreciate it , bless you .
What would you change if you made it again?
I made one like this 20 years ago but I am turning generator motors and made a switch to control the speed.
will there be a diy to how to make this?
what is the rpm of the generator ?
I would like to ask a question, please, how many watts can you produce with a weight of 100 kg? Assuming 220v
outpt voltage?
Para que demore mas tiempo en llegar abajo el contra peso en la polea utiliza el polipasto como con 30 poleas, 15 fijas y 15 movil, quizas saques varias horas de energia con esa configuración de engranajes que hicistes
What if instead of small dc motor your install a bigger generator with low rpm and high torque. I might slower the weight fall time and increase the current output.
Very elegant....Keep going and you will get there.....
respect for sharing though gears are taking too much of energy
Nice wheels!
محرك الأحمال النازله ممتاز
great content thanks
Sir which motor you used? it is ac or dc & its rpm plz tell me
this motor value is 24volt 350watt 3200rpm
This model is promising in terms of preparing a perpetual motion generator if the descending rope is infinite and the shekel is returnable
Es muy simple pero solo para valintes. Se tiene que intercambia pesos de toneladas por 350 amperios con maximo de 3voltios en 1 minutos tiempo maximo, el triunfo es para quienes capturan mas amperaje a bajo voltage. Solo para expertos como yo, energia por gravedad, los dejo de leccion y claves en cada letra, por que yo tengo en funcionamiento, para llenar baterias se nesesita amperios y para elevar voltios de nesesita transformadores fin del informe
Amigo esa agua puede subir a un tanque y llenar 🇭🇳👍
Magnifique
nice yellow car
Try with two counter weights when one down the other up
Before you get your hopes high, remember, to get 1Kwh you need to hang 3.7T of weight at a 100m height. That's not even factoring in mechanical and electrical losses.
Thank you sir for the comments , i do appreciate it , bless you .
That's not so bad, if you're accurate. Concrete, a cheap material, is 2.5X heavier than water at same volume. (One cubic meter of concrete weighs 5,300 lbs. That's two-thirds of your figure.) Reduce the drop to 50 m to get one-half of your figure, or 0.5 kWh. So now we're at two-thirds of 0.5 kWh of production, or about 0.3 kWh per drop.
Assume a small single family home (outside power-hungry USA) uses 3 kWh of electricity each day, so we have 24 hours to create the required energy. So by your figures, we need at least ten drops of a 1m^3 concrete weight in under 24 hours (or one per 2.4 hours) to produce 3 kWh per day. So far, that's quite feasible. Use free/renewable electrical energy to lift the weight each time. I prefer to use (low-tech) collected rainwater to spin a small generator for that, but solar power (fragile, high-tech, expensive, intermittent) is also feasible.
For my suggested setup, I might also install heavy springs under a tracked and latchable platform that receives the weight each time. When unlatched, the sprung platform lifts the weight X meters, thus reducing the energy required to lift/reset the weight. With almost two hours to spare between drops, someone/something can crank down the sprung platform before it receives the weight.
For 3kwh per day, you only need 3 solar panels, a small inverter and a couple of batteries. Compare that to the cost of constructing a load bearing structure 50m high, with a myriad of contraptions and speed reducers.
@@impactodelsurenterprise2440 You don't get 3 kWh per day on cloudy days. Bad weather causes problems for fragile solar panels.
Thanks man I can help you
show
I don't understand the point of this. You're using the energy in a falling weight to produce a little bit of electricity. Why? It only produces energy until the weight reaches the bottom. Pointless!
@@tims6540 The problem is that people have been trying to use gravity to power things for over 1000 years. Look at Perpetual Motion Machines - same technology. We have the answers to the search for free electric power - Wind, Solar, and Hydro. Gravity is not one of them. I admire the guys workmanship, he has really made a fine machine, except it's not going to make endless electricity. He should focus on something that will achieve what he wants and get his creative energy on something that will work. Maybe he could power his machine by water, and I don't mean the water that's coming from his pump. Stick a water wheel in a flowing river and drive the machine from that. Or a wind turbine.
@@tims6540 The largest power company in NZ, I think it's Meridian, has built several wind farms, so that blows your statement about power companies not funding cheaper alternatives right out of the water. We are generating so much electricity from the wind farms that we are selling some to Australia. Our largest coal-fired power generator is on standby and only used for emergencies. All our electricity is from Hydro, Geothermal, Wind and Solar generators, we only have some diesel generators that are used for emergencies, in Hospitals, etc. We have no Nuclear power stations, of course - NZ is Nuclear-free.
@@tims6540 It's just stupid to say that power companies are suppressing cheap alternative energy sources. The power companies are not stupid either, if they can find a cheaper way to produce power you can be 100% certain that they will be using them - they can still sell the power at the same price and make more money! It is not possible to use gravity - people have been trying that for over 1000 years, it's against the laws of physics.
@@tims6540 That is one of the dumbest things I have ever read. There were a large number of motor companies in the early 1900's, a lot of them before Ford. Henry Ford created his own motor company, he didn't get help from anyone with the greatest influence. Saying that is even more stupid. The electric cars built then weren't very good - slow, with very short range. The Dodge brothers, Louis Chevrolet, Walter Chrysler in the USA, Herbert Austin, Wolseley, Morris, in the UK, Gottleib Daimler, Karl Benz (who built the first car!) and others all just wanted to have a successful business and build cars for people. There were hundreds of different factories making cars in the beginning! And what about Stanley, White and others who built steam cars? No-one of any influence helped them. The British government didn't even want them! Read about the infamous Red Flag Act in the UK! In fact, learn some actual facts about anything before you start spouting nonsense like this.
@@tims6540 BTW, the first car was not electric. The first self-propelled vehicles were made in England (not counting Cugnot's Artillery carriage) and were steam powered. Karl Benz built the first petrol-powered car in Germany, although Gottleib Daimler narrowly beat him with his Einspur, which had only 2 wheels. Benz's Motorwagon, built 1885, was a 3-wheeler. There is a video of a replica on TH-cam. Get your facts right.
SHIT !