EMP + Fallout + Nuclear Winter + Breakdown of supply chain = 98.7% fatality rate in first year. And the remaining 1.3% will be the unlucky ones. No Mad Max. No Vault Tec. More like "The Road" and "Threads".
The threat of nuclear winter is a exaggerated one as the studies at the time assumed that the cities in question that would kick up the dust to block out the sun would do so continuously and I think I’ve heard that research since the 1980s has demonstrated that a more likely scenario would be a nuclear autumn or something like the year without a summer that would hurt the northern hemisphere a lot, but would be incredibly devastating for the third world in the aftermath. Likely the majority of deaths outside of the initial war, and the lawlessness and chaos after the initial strike would likely be from this part of the world. The EMPs can be defended against as there is such a thing as makeshift faraday cages. Fallout can be protected against by sealing the cracks in windows walls and turning off heating and air conditioning. The breakdown and supply chains can be prepared for by having a large stockpile of food and water, such as my family has long had, and originally obtained for very different reasons, but has kept in case of disaster, such as this. Honestly, I think that the biggest danger in a nuclear war is simply the fatalism and the unwillingness to try to survive along with the psychological panic people would have. I think that if you got rid of those two factors, a heck of a lot more people would survive then you would think. In short there IS a safe place to hide, but only if you are willing to face the unpleasant facts of this subject, and recognize that a whole hearted attempt of survival is not just the smart thing to do, but possibly even a moral demand on us, so that humankind might continue.
I'm sure that this is a troll post, but I will humor you as if you were serious: Your assumptions (and you do assume *much* ) would only hold up if there were a few nuclear warheads exploded, worldwide. That would be extremely unlikely. Even if, say, India and Pakistan have a "limited" exchange, that would be far more fallout than our human populace could easily endure. Next, you downplay EMP damage by suggesting everybody has Faraday cages for all their electronics. Hey, maybe you do. But do all your neighbors and families? I have not heard such a Pollyanna response to nuclear devastation since the Reagan years. So, anyway...thanks for the laugh!@@lucasquintanilla1673
@@jobiden2942 that definitely would happen in places but I think the government would probably survive well enough that it is highly likely least in the United States that this sort of thing wouldn’t happen over here. That being said, in the third world, and likely in Europe that might happen. In my opinion, it all depends on how well America survives it because if it’s able to get back in shape within a few decades, and maintain enough food supplies in the long run, then there could be something like the Marshall plan to Europe and parts of east Asia within a lifetime.
And that's not even to mention that all electronic devices within a large radius just aren't going to work. So signing up for that app/checking your computer, radio, or phone for updates is going to be about as useful as using a single square of one-ply toilet paper to protect yourself from the blast at ground zero.
Here is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
Potassium Iodide protects your thyroid against radiation, which is one of the most vulnerable body parts. When 911 even happened, the Feds sent my family and everyone else in town, a pack of these, as we lived near a Nuclear plant. Remembering this, I did order some after the Ukraine invasion. I understand that in a real engagement, that that is just one of many factors that can kill me (among others: cannibal looters after 5 weeks of starvation from infrastructure collapse) but it sure doesn't hurt.
Yeah the looting and rape and God knows what else is a scary part to Most people haven't learned from covid to have food put away or iodine tablets, etc . Nowadays we are to focused on the phones and t.v. and believing the government will help when in fact they have family's as well and will be fending for themselves to
One key thing that nobody seems to know is the fact that unlike the bombings of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and just about every scenario depicted, in a nuclear exchange each target location would be struck with multiple warheads. Information on nuclear doctrine from the Soviet Union calls for targets like NYC and DC to be hit with no less that 5 weapons a piece. Each of those weapons would be between 100 and 500 kilotons each, so not even the cockroaches in those cities would survive, and the amount of fallout produced would be spread all over the world. If anyone has seen pictures of people covered in dust after the 9/11 attacks just imagine thousands of times more of that dust but now its radioactive and it’s everywhere. The middle of the country isn’t safe either because that’s where our missile silos are and they are first on the list for target locations. So that psa was ill advised to say the least
Yeah Our basements in the city are jackshit and won’t do anything against this attack, there are windows and such in the basement aswell as in schools, multiple windows in basements and some basements are just too close to ground level, not even that far down, so whatever they say is just getting all 8 million of us killed
@@ILaunchNukes yeah that's what I was talking about. And ICBM's are today limited by international treaty to 10 MRV warheads (Multiple Reentry Vehicles). The earlier generation missiles could carry more warheads with higher fixed yields. But modern missiles will carry dummy MRV's not covered by treaty, to overwhelm anti missile defense systems. Then in addition to ICBM'S, every Bomber and fighter aircraft in our arsenal is rater to carry some kind of nuclear munitions, there are subs off the coasts of adversary nations that carry SLBM missiles the ICBM'S little brother aka(sub launched ballistic missiles), Navy ships can launch nuclear tipped Cruise missiles,. You hear people go on about Tactical nukes like they're something new, when the first one was developed back in the 50's in the Davey Crockett recoilless nuclear rifle, and one Los Alamos engineer was quoted saying as far as size goes we can produce a nuclear hand grenade, but we'd need someone suicidal enough to throw it. And of course there's the relatively new work being done to build hypersonic missiles to carry nuclear weapons that skip the step of going to low earth orbit to release warheads on targets below as current ICBM'S do, but can travel almost as fast as one of those MRV warheads as ot comes down from orbit to hit its target.
@@ILaunchNukes if the cities were to be attacked it wouldn't be just one warhead. Each city / any target would be hit with multiple weapons, with yields of 100 kilotons minimum. Russian weapons can be dialed from 100 kilotons to 3 megatons and American weapons have an upper we limit of 1.2 megatons. So a city and its surrounding suburbs would be erased. New York for example would be hit with no less than 12 weapons, and even at the low end of 100 kt each you'd want to be at least 25 miles from the outer most limit of that area
Remember they have nukes in various types. Some more weaker than others. Also, a Japanese citizen was bombed in Nagasaki, survived, and shortly after went to Hiroshima, was bombed AGAIN and survived with mild radiation burns. He lived to be 90.
I would never count on my luck being that good. There was also still a functional state to retrieve him. The US government wouldn't likely survive a full scale exchange, If it did survive its authority likely wouldn't extend far beyond its directly controlled facilities.
Exactly! Obviously, if there’s some kind of full-scale exchange and you live in a major target city, you’re probably pretty screwed, but the advice could save tons of lives in the event of a terrorist act or limited attack. One school of thought now involves Western countries being too soft to respond with mutually assured destruction, so the idea of strategic strikes with small weapons to create humanitarian problems and disable infrastructure is back on the table.
UK PM hopeful Liz Truss' response to using the country's nuclear weapons as a last resort, "I think it's an important duty of the Prime Minister. I'm ready to do that." "Have we forgotten," indeed!
The NYC PSA, like these films from the 1950s, is aimed at people fairly far away from ground zero, and the advice given is based on what we observed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It’s not all bunk.
1. Kinetics, the zone that is instantly pulverized by the massive fireball caused by the initial explosion. 2. Fallout, the area around where life will be difficult high radiation levels, plants will die and humans as well. 3. Downwind of the fallout will be a toned down fallout but still deadly. The safety video from NYC would be how to die.
Nuclear power plants aren't targets, Primary targets are military installations followed by strategic targets oil refineries, manufacturing ports and such then finally cities.
Imagine what, exactly? A giant boiling swimming pool of glowing liquid? Would the nuclear power plants explode on impact, making some sort of double nuclear detonation? It doesn't really help you to imagine "oh well, my skin will probably just immediately melt off", these plants have failsafes and conditions that they can endure, do your research if you care that much.
This PSA is not for the people who die; it's for the people who live. There will be pockets of survivors after a nuclear attack. Even if 90% of Long Island is wiped out, that's still 760,000 survivors. People who got lucky in basements, subway stations, and reinforced buildings will need to know what to do.
@@faded.177 there are numbers of basements that are good for shelter, NYC is the likely target on Long Island here, not any other town or mini city, Long Island is more populated in the west where the city is than the west in the more forested areas
@@cletusjones9411 I don't know, vomiting everything you eat and crapping everything you didn't vomit will reduce obesity. You don't have to worry about haircuts either. Winning!
@@ejharbet6390 Your teeth will eventually start falling out and your skin will begin falling off and finally your lungs will start filling with fluids and that will cause you to drown.
You'd be okay if you live in say Brazil, There are no nuclear weapons aimed at South America. Australia would be good too well aside from the hordes of Emu's.
You might be surprised, one school of nuclear war theory now suggests that a few small nukes aimed at infrastructure anywhere the West cares about could distract everyone with a huge humanitarian crisis, while MAD wouldn’t start because of the large number of innocent people. Island nation would be one of the best targets because of the logistics chain for help.
HERE is The Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins ** NO FEMALE INVOLVED WHATSOEVER ** - Hebrew Book of Isaiah Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.
Yeah nothings gonna survive a nuclear winter. There's enough nukes to spread radiation probably 2-3 time around the planet. So those fucking animals will turn to barbecue with us.
No matter how much of a misanthrope you are, it doesn't justify total nuclear annihilation of the entire race. Better solutions exist, it's our collective ignorance that prevents us from taking those routes. There's potential to overcome that ignorance if only we could all survive long enough.
Are we going to be in world war 3😮😢😮 I pray and click my heals and say nooooooo the sad unfortunate truth is my 2 daughters two grandsons the humanity, the soil, the land , the sky , the animals, the plants 🪴 the trees , 🌳 the forests, , the oceans 🌊 the lakes 😢😮😢everything on earth 🌎 the earth it self we be severally destroyed and damaged this a huge nightmare on our earth 🌎 Help comes to mind but where oh where???? Is the billion dollar question indeed!
It'd be awful, but we've been here before, essentially we would be brought back to something like the Bronze Age collapse or the fall of the Roman Empire, it would be very bad, but maybe one day it could be seen as just an inevitable hurdle we needed for some sort of better world. And the earth would recover even if we didn't, the dinosaur killer asteroid basically set the entire world on fire and blacked out the sun, the Permian Extinction poisoned the atmosphere, it would recover eventually.
EMP + Fallout + Nuclear Winter + Breakdown of supply chain = 98.7% fatality rate in first year. And the remaining 1.3% will be the unlucky ones. No Mad Max. No Vault Tec. More like "The Road" and "Threads".
The threat of nuclear winter is a exaggerated one as the studies at the time assumed that the cities in question that would kick up the dust to block out the sun would do so continuously and I think I’ve heard that research since the 1980s has demonstrated that a more likely scenario would be a nuclear autumn or something like the year without a summer that would hurt the northern hemisphere a lot, but would be incredibly devastating for the third world in the aftermath. Likely the majority of deaths outside of the initial war, and the lawlessness and chaos after the initial strike would likely be from this part of the world. The EMPs can be defended against as there is such a thing as makeshift faraday cages. Fallout can be protected against by sealing the cracks in windows walls and turning off heating and air conditioning. The breakdown and supply chains can be prepared for by having a large stockpile of food and water, such as my family has long had, and originally obtained for very different reasons, but has kept in case of disaster, such as this. Honestly, I think that the biggest danger in a nuclear war is simply the fatalism and the unwillingness to try to survive along with the psychological panic people would have. I think that if you got rid of those two factors, a heck of a lot more people would survive then you would think. In short there IS a safe place to hide, but only if you are willing to face the unpleasant facts of this subject, and recognize that a whole hearted attempt of survival is not just the smart thing to do, but possibly even a moral demand on us, so that humankind might continue.
I'm sure that this is a troll post, but I will humor you as if you were serious:
Your assumptions (and you do assume *much* ) would only hold up if there were a few nuclear warheads exploded, worldwide. That would be extremely unlikely. Even if, say, India and Pakistan have a "limited" exchange, that would be far more fallout than our human populace could easily endure.
Next, you downplay EMP damage by suggesting everybody has Faraday cages for all their electronics. Hey, maybe you do. But do all your neighbors and families?
I have not heard such a Pollyanna response to nuclear devastation since the Reagan years.
So, anyway...thanks for the laugh!@@lucasquintanilla1673
@@lucasquintanilla1673Humanity would survive but it would lead to hundreds of minor wars for control over resources and states.
@@jobiden2942 that definitely would happen in places but I think the government would probably survive well enough that it is highly likely least in the United States that this sort of thing wouldn’t happen over here. That being said, in the third world, and likely in Europe that might happen. In my opinion, it all depends on how well America survives it because if it’s able to get back in shape within a few decades, and maintain enough food supplies in the long run, then there could be something like the Marshall plan to Europe and parts of east Asia within a lifetime.
The road scares the f outta me. What’s worse is it was the last book we read in school befote Covid
And that's not even to mention that all electronic devices within a large radius just aren't going to work. So signing up for that app/checking your computer, radio, or phone for updates is going to be about as useful as using a single square of one-ply toilet paper to protect yourself from the blast at ground zero.
Here is The Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
There are ways to shield them though, using lead or faraday
When the Wind Blows…
Potassium Iodide protects your thyroid against radiation, which is one of the most vulnerable body parts. When 911 even happened, the Feds sent my family and everyone else in town, a pack of these, as we lived near a Nuclear plant. Remembering this, I did order some after the Ukraine invasion. I understand that in a real engagement, that that is just one of many factors that can kill me (among others: cannibal looters after 5 weeks of starvation from infrastructure collapse) but it sure doesn't hurt.
Yeah the looting and rape and God knows what else is a scary part to
Most people haven't learned from covid to have food put away or iodine tablets, etc . Nowadays we are to focused on the phones and t.v. and believing the government will help when in fact they have family's as well and will be fending for themselves to
One key thing that nobody seems to know is the fact that unlike the bombings of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and just about every scenario depicted, in a nuclear exchange each target location would be struck with multiple warheads. Information on nuclear doctrine from the Soviet Union calls for targets like NYC and DC to be hit with no less that 5 weapons a piece. Each of those weapons would be between 100 and 500 kilotons each, so not even the cockroaches in those cities would survive, and the amount of fallout produced would be spread all over the world. If anyone has seen pictures of people covered in dust after the 9/11 attacks just imagine thousands of times more of that dust but now its radioactive and it’s everywhere. The middle of the country isn’t safe either because that’s where our missile silos are and they are first on the list for target locations. So that psa was ill advised to say the least
Yeah
Our basements in the city are jackshit and won’t do anything against this attack, there are windows and such in the basement aswell as in schools, multiple windows in basements and some basements are just too close to ground level, not even that far down, so whatever they say is just getting all 8 million of us killed
Also MIRVs exist. Nuck
lear Missiles now can carry as much as 10 warheads per missile.
@@ILaunchNukes yeah that's what I was talking about. And ICBM's are today limited by international treaty to 10 MRV warheads (Multiple Reentry Vehicles). The earlier generation missiles could carry more warheads with higher fixed yields. But modern missiles will carry dummy MRV's not covered by treaty, to overwhelm anti missile defense systems. Then in addition to ICBM'S, every Bomber and fighter aircraft in our arsenal is rater to carry some kind of nuclear munitions, there are subs off the coasts of adversary nations that carry SLBM missiles the ICBM'S little brother aka(sub launched ballistic missiles), Navy ships can launch nuclear tipped Cruise missiles,. You hear people go on about Tactical nukes like they're something new, when the first one was developed back in the 50's in the Davey Crockett recoilless nuclear rifle, and one Los Alamos engineer was quoted saying as far as size goes we can produce a nuclear hand grenade, but we'd need someone suicidal enough to throw it. And of course there's the relatively new work being done to build hypersonic missiles to carry nuclear weapons that skip the step of going to low earth orbit to release warheads on targets below as current ICBM'S do, but can travel almost as fast as one of those MRV warheads as ot comes down from orbit to hit its target.
@@limabravo6065
If a MIRV was headed for a city, there's a chance the surrounding towns could be struck by warheads.
@@ILaunchNukes if the cities were to be attacked it wouldn't be just one warhead. Each city / any target would be hit with multiple weapons, with yields of 100 kilotons minimum. Russian weapons can be dialed from 100 kilotons to 3 megatons and American weapons have an upper we limit of 1.2 megatons. So a city and its surrounding suburbs would be erased. New York for example would be hit with no less than 12 weapons, and even at the low end of 100 kt each you'd want to be at least 25 miles from the outer most limit of that area
Remember they have nukes in various types. Some more weaker than others.
Also, a Japanese citizen was bombed in Nagasaki, survived, and shortly after went to Hiroshima, was bombed AGAIN and survived with mild radiation burns.
He lived to be 90.
I would never count on my luck being that good. There was also still a functional state to retrieve him. The US government wouldn't likely survive a full scale exchange, If it did survive its authority likely wouldn't extend far beyond its directly controlled facilities.
Exactly! Obviously, if there’s some kind of full-scale exchange and you live in a major target city, you’re probably pretty screwed, but the advice could save tons of lives in the event of a terrorist act or limited attack.
One school of thought now involves Western countries being too soft to respond with mutually assured destruction, so the idea of strategic strikes with small weapons to create humanitarian problems and disable infrastructure is back on the table.
UK PM hopeful Liz Truss' response to using the country's nuclear weapons as a last resort, "I think it's an important duty of the Prime Minister. I'm ready to do that." "Have we forgotten," indeed!
The NYC PSA, like these films from the 1950s, is aimed at people fairly far away from ground zero, and the advice given is based on what we observed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It’s not all bunk.
1. Kinetics, the zone that is instantly pulverized by the massive fireball caused by the initial explosion. 2. Fallout, the area around where life will be difficult high radiation levels, plants will die and humans as well. 3. Downwind of the fallout will be a toned down fallout but still deadly. The safety video from NYC would be how to die.
Also imagine how many nuclear power plants that would go into meltdown in such a scenario.
It would make Earth uninhabitable for humans for a very long time.
Nuclear power plants aren't targets, Primary targets are military installations followed by strategic targets oil refineries, manufacturing ports and such then finally cities.
@@DrEgonCholakian They'd still be hit, inevitably.
Imagine what, exactly? A giant boiling swimming pool of glowing liquid? Would the nuclear power plants explode on impact, making some sort of double nuclear detonation?
It doesn't really help you to imagine "oh well, my skin will probably just immediately melt off", these plants have failsafes and conditions that they can endure, do your research if you care that much.
Good video but elides the fact that NYC would get several bombs from MIRVs with various target points in the city. Each 800-400 kt
I mean, there is.
But it's the International Space Station.
This PSA is not for the people who die; it's for the people who live. There will be pockets of survivors after a nuclear attack. Even if 90% of Long Island is wiped out, that's still 760,000 survivors. People who got lucky in basements, subway stations, and reinforced buildings will need to know what to do.
u are out of ur mind if u think thered be that many survivors let alone ANY for that matter
@@faded.177 there are numbers of basements that are good for shelter, NYC is the likely target on Long Island here, not any other town or mini city, Long Island is more populated in the west where the city is than the west in the more forested areas
God help any survivors. Life won’t be good after an all out nuclear war.
@@cletusjones9411 I don't know, vomiting everything you eat and crapping everything you didn't vomit will reduce obesity.
You don't have to worry about haircuts either. Winning!
@@ejharbet6390 Your teeth will eventually start falling out and your skin will begin falling off and finally your lungs will start filling with fluids and that will cause you to drown.
By this time I'm rollin' for the nukes
Meteor. If I or anyone else happens to survive it’s at least just a hard long winter without radiation poisoning.
"Rember to duck and cover" 🤣 we're done for
Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation.
"Sunburn cream"...!🙄
They just put another warning our recently
so long and thanks for all the maynard
You'd be okay if you live in say Brazil, There are no nuclear weapons aimed at South America. Australia would be good too well aside from the hordes of Emu's.
You might be surprised, one school of nuclear war theory now suggests that a few small nukes aimed at infrastructure anywhere the West cares about could distract everyone with a huge humanitarian crisis, while MAD wouldn’t start because of the large number of innocent people. Island nation would be one of the best targets because of the logistics chain for help.
Only 4K views? :(
Can't hide from GOD'S judgment, wrath.
BRING IT.
HERE is The Savior
HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH”
YaH is The Heavenly Father
YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING
YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins
** NO FEMALE INVOLVED WHATSOEVER **
- Hebrew Book of Isaiah
Isaiah 42:8
"I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.
Isaiah 43:11
I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.
Isaiah 45:5
I am YaH, and there is none else.
Less humans is a blessing for all the other species on Earth that are being snuffed out of existence for our consumption of resources.
12 monkeys is a better solution, more selective
Yeah nothings gonna survive a nuclear winter. There's enough nukes to spread radiation probably 2-3 time around the planet. So those fucking animals will turn to barbecue with us.
No matter how much of a misanthrope you are, it doesn't justify total nuclear annihilation of the entire race. Better solutions exist, it's our collective ignorance that prevents us from taking those routes. There's potential to overcome that ignorance if only we could all survive long enough.
Nuclear winter is fantastic for all other forms of life on the planet. /s
I bet you're reared commit a mass shooting then*
*not an encouragement, don't do this
Most of the footage was used for beakmans world flatulence.
nukes genetic superweapons and anthrax.
Are we going to be in world war 3😮😢😮 I pray and click my heals and say nooooooo the sad unfortunate truth is my 2 daughters two grandsons the humanity, the soil, the land , the sky , the animals, the plants 🪴 the trees , 🌳 the forests, , the oceans 🌊 the lakes 😢😮😢everything on earth 🌎 the earth it self we be severally destroyed and damaged this a huge nightmare on our earth 🌎
Help comes to mind but where oh where????
Is the billion dollar question indeed!
It'd be awful, but we've been here before, essentially we would be brought back to something like the Bronze Age collapse or the fall of the Roman Empire, it would be very bad, but maybe one day it could be seen as just an inevitable hurdle we needed for some sort of better world.
And the earth would recover even if we didn't, the dinosaur killer asteroid basically set the entire world on fire and blacked out the sun, the Permian Extinction poisoned the atmosphere, it would recover eventually.
Wth??? That WAS made in the 50s. Where's the modern one? I call bullshit.
Fallout 3
😳☢️
Is the Vaseline for the wife? Getting into her hard to reach places
🤣💯
Armageddon soon
If you actually read the news you know that’s unlikely