Captain is doing pretty good job. Read my translation a few pages back. There are 4 men in the crew, and he's talking to all 4. He's yelling thrust settings the whole time to engineer to set throttles on his panel (standard procedure on Tu154), he's responding to the guy with video camera who is navigator/radio operator and who is running checklist and other call-outs, and at the same time he's talking FO through landing. FO is not keeping up with situation and is constantly messing up.
Nice video, it seems funny how the both men discuss. I'm understand only a little, because i'm learning russian currently. Tu-154 forever, the best plane all over the world!
@Timsalt3100 Planes used analogue glass gagues for years & years, even Concorde & it never caused a problem, works very well and it's a very standard layout. The reason why there are so 'many' gagues is that things are duplicated a lot for safety.
this aircraft is in many respects better than modern aircraft, it is faster, can gain altitude almost a kilometer more, is more comfortable, unpretentious in maintenance. But there are also negative sides. it is very difficult to control (that's why there are four people in the crew) it is noisier and consumes a lot of fuel.
Liked the ATS system. The Captain seemed "pissed" with the way the First Officer was piloting the airplane (did you see him grab the yoke and rock it back and forth).
I used to fly a number of russian and western aircraft, Cpt. of B-747-400 now. This is good coaching from Captain to F/O. Cpt never sayd stupid, at 2:12 he sayd "where is glide slope" and showed him on instrument. CRM is normal and approach was done good.
Well, as you can read lower in the comments, this was a train flight, so the training pilot is a little overreacting, but the trainee actually is quate calm and doing alright.
There is a translation of this a few pages back. Not sure if it's still the same now, but( unlike in US) Aeroflot crews used to fly together for months, sometimes years. Also to upgrade you had to be recommended by captains, not seniority based. You had to learn to get along, or be FO forever. Slapping captain across face as someone suggested would not get you far. This guy is obviously new and is screwing up a bit. I'm sure by the time we read this they are palls, drinking beer on overnights:)
Actually even Airbus and Boeing had analog cockpits before the introduction of "glass" cockpits in the 1990's :P. You'd be surprised by how many jets actually don't have glass cockpits :P.
@MoscowsFinest Wrong!, Autopilot is disconnected by the copilot at 1:08 He says "disengaging autopilot" followed by 3 beeps. Later captains takes the yoke to show the copilot that he should not over-control left and right "like AN-2" as it does nothing, "it just flies straight"
@gryzman The "shouting" guy is an instructor. And his attitude is absolute normal (at least, for Russians). Young pilot is doing ok, so sometimes instructor just corrects his actions. An instructor just speaks loudly for lots of noise inside a cockpit. Finally, an instructor seems satisfied and says: "Good job!"("Molodets!") to a young pilot. Maybe Russian language itself sounds a little bit rough for foreigners
@Sebaan777 The ringing sound is the signal from antenna on the ground about 4 miles from runway known as Outer Marker. Camera man says "passing outer" after the ringing stops. 2:50
@AgonisNewt The problem with Russian civil aircraft in recent years has been with maintenance not design. These planes have been a workhorse for 4 decades, given the numbers in service and the heavy use in varied conditions, they are in fact very reliable. Nothing wrong with Russian cars.
@gryzman it might not be the best approach but CA IS the one with all of the experience. Russian language is very rough sounding, so when speaking normally it can appear one is shouting. By the sounds of the FOs voice, he is young so the captain is trying to teach him.
This is an awesome video. Even though I have a serious, serious language barrier here. Communication comes through in different ways. I watched it again and I thought the pilot said 'that's stupid' at 2:12! He is definitely enjoying being in charge of this aircraft. The best part is 3:10. My daughter and I laughed so hard. We had to watch that part a few times.
@AirSimming You're definitely right that they can take rougher conditions. That applies to later fighter variants too - their most advanced models, like the Su27, can handle gravel strips. And they use basic jet fuel. In wartime conditions I think they'd have an edge over the 'thoroughbred' US fighters, that need advanced strips and hyper refined fuel.
The TU 154's are excellent planes with a good safety record. I'd rather fly in one of these than one that McDonnel Douglas churns out, expecially an MD 80.
@Timsalt3100 Yes, I think Concorde made its operating costs back & made a profit, but never made it's development costs back. Used to fly in at about 2000ft over our house in a great banking turn, beautiful thing to see but incredibly LOUD, a deep throated rumbling beast of a sound like nothing else.... l ol
Ребята, всем кому не нравится поведение КВС советую посмотреть весь фильм, а не только этот фрагмент. Фильм называется Полет в Новый Уренгой. Капитан - нормальный мужик, и подробно разьясняет второиу как надо, но и если что поругает.
@3replybiz These planes operate in some of the harshest climates in the world and on unpaved gravel landing strips in the middle of Siberia with few service facilities. It is unlikely that any other civilian plane would have been up to the task fulfilled by the 154. It was a lifeline for many remote areas because it could go where no other similar passenger plane was able to.
This jet was actually full of passengers in time of the action. This is from Russiun documentary "Полёт на Новый Уренгой". The guy on the right have no clue how to land the plane, but he still landing it, sort of...
The flight engineer sitting behind the pilots can control the thrust as well. He has his own set of throttles physically linked with the pilot's throttle controls, hence the pilot's throttles appear to be moving by themselves.
These are great aircraft. Boeing and McDonald Douglas had more crashes then Tupolev had with these. However because the Soviet Union had a one airline policy, each time one of its jets crashed it was attributed to a sum total of crashes on one ariline. In the US and Europe and Asia and Africa it was different. Each crash was attributed to the airline to which the crashed aricraft belonged. The Illyushin and the Tupolev are great aircraft and great workhorses. In Iran the crashes were suspect.
As already responded ДАВЛЕНИЕ means pressure (of something I'm unaware of) As for РЕЖИМ 83 (or random number), since autothrottle (even if installed) is not used on approach, the flight engineer sets the engine RPMs, so if the captain calls for РЕЖИМ 83, the engineer would spool and sync all engines to 83% КВД (Компресор Високи Давления or High pressure compressor). As you can see at 8m of radio altitude, the captain calls for Idle thrust too (Маль газ). I'm not russian, so sry for misspelling.
The fact is that piloting the TU-154 is quite difficult. That is why the engines are controlled by the flight engineer, who has a thrust control panel. The captain voices to him the necessary engine operation mode in % of the maximum thrust.
Too you gotta keep in mind this is an aircraft in approach and final approach of a runway there is no time to mess around and the co-pilot should have known the procedure of the aircraft configuration to land.
It's awesome for plane enthusiasts. From a distance, aircraft dont seem to sound any louder, the only aircraft that will seem (and will be) much quieter will be the SAX-40. It's better to either live away from an airport, or use good soundproofing.
Ok, I don't mind playing with statistics: Boeing (without MD-fleet) has built: 707-1000pcs, 727-1800, 737-6000, 747-1400, 757-1000, 767- 1000, 777-800, total cca 13000 airplanes. Tupolev has built 400 tu-104,114,124, 800 tu-134 and less than 1000 tu-154, less than 100 tu-204. Total 2300 (generously). So 600 catastrophes on 13000 aicraft (if your data is correct) is 4,6 on 100 aircraft for Boeing. 150 catastrophes on 2300 aircraft is 6.5 on 100 aircraft for Tupolev. 50% more! And flight time?
The checklists were used.. they are read by third pilot on tu-154.. the captain and f/o have to only confirm..theres a lot of talking in this vid.. and believe me its not about vodka ;) they were doing callouts about speed about flaps about glideslope + reading the checklists...the captain seems to have some anger problems but apart from that everything was done as needed.
The voice, actually belongs to their navigator, who is also recording. There are no more navigator positions, I know of. I am an F/O and I never flew an aircraft that requires a flight engineer and a navigator. So this whole thing is somewhat bizarre to me...
Having seen a few of these Russians flying on TH-cam, the captain is usually very confident and assertive and everybody is very vocal. I think it makes for good communication, it's a difference in culture & training which works for them. A lot of these R pilots are ex-military, the kind of people used to landing fighters on a aircraft carrier at night in the Arctic in a storm. Russian planes have a great safety record, it's the maintenance that has let them down not the crews or design.
Hey, this is what I'm talkin' about!! This is flying!! Check out all of those "steam gauges" - wow! "Doncha" just luv em? Yesssss! Did anyone notice that the slip-skid indicator always indicated about "a half ball to the right"? Maybe the airframe is "bent" causing the aircraft to fly "a bit sideways" - just a thought. Oh, I think I had "that guy" when I was working on my Instrument; sounds familiar. He was a furloghed Pam Am pilot - and was exceedly pissed off!!
Well it took a few minutes, but here is translation for this video. On Tu 154 captain calls for power settings and engineer sets throttles on his panel. there is also a radio operator/navigator who does most call outs. I marked him with (-)
I'am from Russia. Captain is not crazy :)) This is a best video about Tu-154M and our Captain, that teached second pilot, how he must land aircraft with autopilot (director-mode).
@AirSimming Thanks - I didn't know the reliability figures on Soyuz vs Shuttle. I'll mention that to my friend who tends to disparage Soviet technology.
Yes, but you are forgetting that these aircraft constantly operate in some of the most extreme environments in the world.If you check out the accident statistics, out of 36 hull loses, 6 were due to missile attacks, 1 mid air, several skidding off the runway (poor conditions) and most others frompoor loading and airline safety and pilot error. There have only been 2 losses due to structural failiure/technical failure. Compare that to MD80 loses invoving structral failure.
3-697 we request a wind 4-90 degrees speed of 15 km 1-chassis let out!! 2-chassis has let out 1-mode 83!! 3-mode 83 3-removal 10 3 up to an input 3-It is a little more to the left 1-commands should be carried out!!! Headlights to let out to include!!! Flaps 36!!! 1-Do not decrease!!! 2-like have entered in глисаду? 1-what глисада!!! It it is far from you!!! Here look where it!!! 3-We approach to глисаде 3-36 it is let out speed 290 fall synchronously a 1-mode 82!! 3-mode 82
@AirSimming I'm with you man. I think the Soviets were totally underrated. I guess the main reason I said that was that the planes were certainly heavier and dirtier (i.e. more pollution) than western models, according to an air traffic controller I spoke to once anyway. And I do remember seeing a Tupolev airliner lining up for takeoff - he has to goose the engines to max while keeping the brakes full on, and even so it looked like he used every last foot of the runway.
1-Do not stir it!!! You do not have wind!!! Take a steering wheel on itself a little!!! 3-speed 290 1-Look a steering wheel it is possible to stir!!! The plane will fly directly!!! 3-height 150 1-headlights society!!! 3-was good 1-Do not stir a steering wheel under a roll in the different parties!!! 3-speed 280 3-100 meters 280 vertical 4 90 estimation? 1-Landing!!! 3-80 meters 3-70 meters the decision we sit down 3-have passed a near rate a little below 1-was normally!!! 3-40
FOC150, here you sound like Embry- Riddle grad that got into a right seat of an RJ with a couple hundred hours of total time. Wait till you got a few thousand hours in a left seat of a 100+ pax jet and your views will change. In Russian cockpit, as well as in many US major airline cockpits, while CRM exists, captain is still very much in-charge and is given a degree of respect by FO and other crewmembers. Also, in this video captain speaks louder when landing gear is down due to wind noise.
He is not getting angry against the yoke; he shows the trainee/co-pilot that the plane flies straight even if he dangles the yoke: "you can dangle it, it will fly straight nevertheless" -- he says.
so what was that at 3:10 was taht the captain shaking the yoke or the f/o, because that seems like it'd be unconfortable anyways, i know in america the fo is allways on the right but what about here?
1-The control over a card!!! 3-mechanization covered 1-here have now entered in глисаду!!! 2-It is let out 45 1-45 it is shone 3-The stabilizer 3-Headlights are let out 3-697 has entered in глисаду headlights are let out to landing it is ready 4-697 landing I resolve 3-697 has understood landing have resolved 3-It is a little above 1-Mode 81!!! 3-Mode 81 3-Speed 280 1-You what for stir a steering wheel?!!!! Hold and do not stir it!!! What for you stir it as on AN-2?!!!
CA is not angry just trying to teach the guy, while making all required calls with FE and radio operator/navigator who is doing callouts that are normally made by computers in modern jets. FO while quiet, is errogant at times arguing with captain's instructions. Nav: "glideslope alive" CA: "Don't descend! Pavel!" FO: "I'm on glideslope!" Nav: "not yet, it just came alive" CA: "Ah come-on, where do you see glideslope? It didn't come to you yet...look where glide slope is" -pointing 2:15
@electricrailwaygod You can come to Russia and fly 2nd class airlines like UTAir. Unfortunely major russian airlines doesn`t use tu-154 anymore. Love this old fast reliable bird, hope to fly it again too.
@RadekCT That is bullshit. The safety records for tu-154 are not so bad. Its just that the maintenance of these aircraft can sometimes be poor. The plane itself is great. more than 30 years in service and still carries people safely. Every plane is intended to crash.
Okay let's point out something in this video. Poitrenaud BerlinBunker1 and etc all of you who say he's rude you have to ask yourself a couple of question. Do you know how much ride the captain as been taking with him and if he did good on the previous ride or did he acted exactly like in this video? You dont know that and even pilots can get pretty tired of a situation like this
Captain is doing pretty good job. Read my translation a few pages back. There are 4 men in the crew, and he's talking to all 4. He's yelling thrust settings the whole time to engineer to set throttles on his panel (standard procedure on Tu154), he's responding to the guy with video camera who is navigator/radio operator and who is running checklist and other call-outs, and at the same time he's talking FO through landing. FO is not keeping up with situation and is constantly messing up.
OMG the chaos in that cockpit is un believable!
That's because, unlike Boeing and Airbus Aircraft which fly captains, Tu-154M is flown by the captains.
Soviet team work
I think the Captain was so accustomed with the aircraft, he isn't piloting it he actually casually driving LOL
Nice video, it seems funny how the both men discuss. I'm understand only a little, because i'm learning russian currently.
Tu-154 forever, the best plane all over the world!
@Timsalt3100 Planes used analogue glass gagues for years & years, even Concorde & it never caused a problem, works very well and it's a very standard layout. The reason why there are so 'many' gagues is that things are duplicated a lot for safety.
@gryzman the captain is just teaching young unexpierenced guy. quite well actually/ thats all
@AgonisNewt The TU-154 was designed in the 60s, it compares with UK & US planes from that time, very robust and reliable and a real work-horse.
this aircraft is in many respects better than modern aircraft, it is faster, can gain altitude almost a kilometer more, is more comfortable, unpretentious in maintenance.
But there are also negative sides. it is very difficult to control (that's why there are four people in the crew) it is noisier and consumes a lot of fuel.
Liked the ATS system. The Captain seemed "pissed" with the way the First Officer was piloting the airplane (did you see him grab the yoke and rock it back and forth).
I used to fly a number of russian and western aircraft, Cpt. of B-747-400 now. This is good coaching from Captain to F/O. Cpt never sayd stupid, at 2:12 he sayd "where is glide slope" and showed him on instrument. CRM is normal and approach was done good.
jawed karim had added this video to his playlist, I don't know if he still have this to his playlist but, yah he had this in his playlist.
ESV88: 727 is older, but still flying and no one is complaining about it. And that noise from the 154 is awesome
Well, as you can read lower in the comments, this was a train flight, so the training pilot is a little overreacting, but the trainee actually is quate calm and doing alright.
There is a translation of this a few pages back.
Not sure if it's still the same now, but( unlike in US) Aeroflot crews used to fly together for months, sometimes years. Also to upgrade you had to be recommended by captains, not seniority based. You had to learn to get along, or be FO forever. Slapping captain across face as someone suggested would not get you far. This guy is obviously new and is screwing up a bit. I'm sure by the time we read this they are palls, drinking beer on overnights:)
You are correct..It sounds like all 3 are talking at once and they do not have ant STD operationg prosedures..
Actually even Airbus and Boeing had analog cockpits before the introduction of "glass" cockpits in the 1990's :P.
You'd be surprised by how many jets actually don't have glass cockpits :P.
@MoscowsFinest Wrong!, Autopilot is disconnected by the copilot at 1:08 He says "disengaging autopilot" followed by 3 beeps. Later captains takes the yoke to show the copilot that he should not over-control left and right "like AN-2" as it does nothing, "it just flies straight"
@gryzman
The "shouting" guy is an instructor. And his attitude is absolute normal (at least, for Russians). Young pilot is doing ok, so sometimes instructor just corrects his actions. An instructor just speaks loudly for lots of noise inside a cockpit. Finally, an instructor seems satisfied and says: "Good job!"("Molodets!") to a young pilot. Maybe Russian language itself sounds a little bit rough for foreigners
@Sebaan777 The ringing sound is the signal from antenna on the ground about 4 miles from runway known as Outer Marker. Camera man says "passing outer" after the ringing stops. 2:50
@AgonisNewt The problem with Russian civil aircraft in recent years has been with maintenance not design. These planes have been a workhorse for 4 decades, given the numbers in service and the heavy use in varied conditions, they are in fact very reliable. Nothing wrong with Russian cars.
@gryzman
it might not be the best approach but CA IS the one with all of the experience. Russian language is very rough sounding, so when speaking normally it can appear one is shouting. By the sounds of the FOs voice, he is young so the captain is trying to teach him.
@xoio The ring is a Middle Marker. Guy with camera says "passing middle, on speed on glideslope"
I love this video :) The sound of the marker is amazing.
This is an awesome video. Even though I have a serious, serious language barrier here. Communication comes through in different ways. I watched it again and I thought the pilot said 'that's stupid' at 2:12! He is definitely enjoying being in charge of this aircraft. The best part is 3:10. My daughter and I laughed so hard. We had to watch that part a few times.
@AirSimming You're definitely right that they can take rougher conditions. That applies to later fighter variants too - their most advanced models, like the Su27, can handle gravel strips. And they use basic jet fuel. In wartime conditions I think they'd have an edge over the 'thoroughbred' US fighters, that need advanced strips and hyper refined fuel.
@3replybiz good point i knew the only reason that concorde was never digitized was because it was too expensive and it would never get that cost back.
The TU 154's are excellent planes with a good safety record. I'd rather fly in one of these than one that McDonnel Douglas churns out, expecially an MD 80.
Очень интересно наблюдать за работой пилотов при посадке. Эффект присутствия)) немного завидую, очень хотел быть летчиком
Thanks for posting. The atmosphere in that cockpit is certainly different from those in the west!
Thank you for this! I was very curious what he was saying. I appreciate the translation.
@Timsalt3100 Yes, I think Concorde made its operating costs back & made a profit, but never made it's development costs back. Used to fly in at about 2000ft over our house in a great banking turn, beautiful thing to see but incredibly LOUD, a deep throated rumbling beast of a sound like nothing else.... l ol
Ребята, всем кому не нравится поведение КВС советую посмотреть весь фильм, а не только этот фрагмент. Фильм называется Полет в Новый Уренгой. Капитан - нормальный мужик, и подробно разьясняет второиу как надо, но и если что поругает.
@3replybiz These planes operate in some of the harshest climates in the world and on unpaved gravel landing strips in the middle of Siberia with few service facilities. It is unlikely that any other civilian plane would have been up to the task fulfilled by the 154. It was a lifeline for many remote areas because it could go where no other similar passenger plane was able to.
This jet was actually full of passengers in time of the action. This is from Russiun documentary "Полёт на Новый Уренгой". The guy on the right have no clue how to land the plane, but he still landing it, sort of...
@osjcag The copilot is new and the pilot tells him play with control dont affect the simetry
@maximapitko unfortunely VIA doesn`t use TU-154 anymore. It`s banned in EU due to it`s noise. Pity, the sound of tu-154`s engines is a symphony.
what about the 737-200, and the 707? lol,
I like newer plance better, but not all computrisation, like the 757 and 767 I love. Perfect mix of both
The flight engineer sitting behind the pilots can control the thrust as well. He has his own set of throttles physically linked with the pilot's throttle controls, hence the pilot's throttles appear to be moving by themselves.
These are great aircraft. Boeing and McDonald Douglas had more crashes then Tupolev had with these. However because the Soviet Union had a one airline policy, each time one of its jets crashed it was attributed to a sum total of crashes on one ariline. In the US and Europe and Asia and Africa it was different. Each crash was attributed to the airline to which the crashed aricraft belonged. The Illyushin and the Tupolev are great aircraft and great workhorses. In Iran the crashes were suspect.
As already responded ДАВЛЕНИЕ means pressure (of something I'm unaware of)
As for РЕЖИМ 83 (or random number), since autothrottle (even if installed) is not used on approach, the flight engineer sets the engine RPMs, so if the captain calls for РЕЖИМ 83, the engineer would spool and sync all engines to 83% КВД (Компресор Високи Давления or High pressure compressor). As you can see at 8m of radio altitude, the captain calls for Idle thrust too (Маль газ). I'm not russian, so sry for misspelling.
The fact is that piloting the TU-154 is quite difficult. That is why the engines are controlled by the flight engineer, who has a thrust control panel. The captain voices to him the necessary engine operation mode in % of the maximum thrust.
Too you gotta keep in mind this is an aircraft in approach and final approach of a runway there is no time to mess around and the co-pilot should have known the procedure of the aircraft configuration to land.
@CorrectOneFive i think thats the copilot. i heard 50 40 30 20 before touchdown. i kno they werent jus chatting.
It's awesome for plane enthusiasts. From a distance, aircraft dont seem to sound any louder, the only aircraft that will seem (and will be) much quieter will be the SAX-40. It's better to either live away from an airport, or use good soundproofing.
Ok, I don't mind playing with statistics: Boeing (without MD-fleet) has built: 707-1000pcs, 727-1800, 737-6000, 747-1400, 757-1000, 767- 1000, 777-800, total cca 13000 airplanes. Tupolev has built 400 tu-104,114,124, 800 tu-134 and less than 1000 tu-154, less than 100 tu-204. Total 2300 (generously). So 600 catastrophes on 13000 aicraft (if your data is correct) is 4,6 on 100 aircraft for Boeing. 150 catastrophes on 2300 aircraft is 6.5 on 100 aircraft for Tupolev. 50% more! And flight time?
@gryzman Because it is the instructor teaching the beginner, and we do not know how he was tired of him :)
they use them, but they are read by third pilot and answered by captain and f/o so it just cannot be seen in this vid
No Problem and respect, russian isn't easy to learn.
Yes, the Tu 154 is an older model of Tuploev, all hydraulic systems.
@Timsalt3100 Concorde carried a huge amount of computer navigation equipment as it became available though.
The checklists were used.. they are read by third pilot on tu-154.. the captain and f/o have to only confirm..theres a lot of talking in this vid.. and believe me its not about vodka ;)
they were doing callouts about speed about flaps about glideslope + reading the checklists...the captain seems to have some anger problems but apart from that everything was done as needed.
The voice, actually belongs to their navigator, who is also recording. There are no more navigator positions, I know of. I am an F/O and I never flew an aircraft that requires a flight engineer and a navigator. So this whole thing is somewhat bizarre to me...
Having seen a few of these Russians flying on TH-cam, the captain is usually very confident and assertive and everybody is very vocal. I think it makes for good communication, it's a difference in culture & training which works for them. A lot of these R pilots are ex-military, the kind of people used to landing fighters on a aircraft carrier at night in the Arctic in a storm. Russian planes have a great safety record, it's the maintenance that has let them down not the crews or design.
@electricrailwaygod AIR VIA used to fly them in Bulgaria. Google them and check if they still do. Good luck!
Hey, this is what I'm talkin' about!! This is flying!! Check out all of those "steam gauges" - wow! "Doncha" just luv em? Yesssss! Did anyone notice that the slip-skid indicator always indicated about "a half ball to the right"? Maybe the airframe is "bent" causing the aircraft to fly "a bit sideways" - just a thought.
Oh, I think I had "that guy" when I was working on my Instrument; sounds familiar. He was a furloghed Pam Am pilot - and was exceedly pissed off!!
Well it took a few minutes, but here is translation for this video.
On Tu 154 captain calls for power settings and engineer sets throttles on his panel.
there is also a radio operator/navigator who does most call outs. I marked him with (-)
I'am from Russia. Captain is not crazy :)) This is a best video about Tu-154M and our Captain, that teached second pilot, how he must land aircraft with autopilot (director-mode).
@AirSimming Thanks - I didn't know the reliability figures on Soyuz vs Shuttle. I'll mention that to my friend who tends to disparage Soviet technology.
Yes, but you are forgetting that these aircraft constantly operate in some of the most extreme environments in the world.If you check out the accident statistics, out of 36 hull loses, 6 were due to missile attacks, 1 mid air, several skidding off the runway (poor conditions) and most others frompoor loading and airline safety and pilot error. There have only been 2 losses due to structural failiure/technical failure. Compare that to MD80 loses invoving structral failure.
3-697 we request a wind
4-90 degrees speed of 15 km
1-chassis let out!!
2-chassis has let out
1-mode 83!!
3-mode 83
3-removal 10 3 up to an input
3-It is a little more to the left
1-commands should be carried out!!! Headlights to let out to include!!! Flaps 36!!!
1-Do not decrease!!!
2-like have entered in глисаду?
1-what глисада!!! It it is far from you!!! Here look where it!!!
3-We approach to глисаде
3-36 it is let out speed 290 fall synchronously a 1-mode 82!!
3-mode 82
very nice video and I think...Boris Y is calling the captain to say hello....
@ENCOMAN
The pilot on the left is teaching the one on the right...
but yes he is yelling a bit too much...
I have a question please about the autothrottle system: each engine is independant from each other?? amazing!
what is that in the centre above the throttles? I keep expecting Mr.Spock to look down it to look for life signs lol
@AirSimming Where do you get all this info? I'd like to know more of this stuff.
@AirSimming I'm with you man. I think the Soviets were totally underrated. I guess the main reason I said that was that the planes were certainly heavier and dirtier (i.e. more pollution) than western models, according to an air traffic controller I spoke to once anyway. And I do remember seeing a Tupolev airliner lining up for takeoff - he has to goose the engines to max while keeping the brakes full on, and even so it looked like he used every last foot of the runway.
@imolitor2007 They ran approach and landing checklist.
Whats that bell that sounds before touchdown, is that some form of Desision Hight warning?
where? did u not see the 1st officer moving about the controll collum? or the captain moving it really abruptly? how is it on autopilot?
I fell asleep watching your link. Is that aircraft piloted by Hal 9000? At least the computer screens looked cool. :P
From 2:54
CA: "You are not flying it right!, look This is how you fly a plane!!." *Shakes yoke*..
*Hands controls back*.
1-Do not stir it!!! You do not have wind!!! Take a steering wheel on itself a little!!! 3-speed 290
1-Look a steering wheel it is possible to stir!!! The plane will fly directly!!!
3-height 150
1-headlights society!!!
3-was good
1-Do not stir a steering wheel under a roll in the different parties!!!
3-speed 280
3-100 meters 280 vertical 4 90 estimation?
1-Landing!!!
3-80 meters
3-70 meters the decision we sit down
3-have passed a near rate a little below
1-was normally!!!
3-40
FOC150, here you sound like Embry- Riddle grad that got into a right seat of an RJ with a couple hundred hours of total time. Wait till you got a few thousand hours in a left seat of a 100+ pax jet and your views will change. In Russian cockpit, as well as in many US major airline cockpits, while CRM exists, captain is still very much in-charge and is given a degree of respect by FO and other crewmembers.
Also, in this video captain speaks louder when landing gear is down due to wind noise.
3:05 - 3:20
LOOOOL
"Anyway, it will fly straightly even if you shake the wheel".
So that is why Tupolev has only ~150 crashes :))))))))
Flying by feeling how the plane feels that day. No check lists required.
@gryzman
Hello gryzman. It's obvious that this is a training, the captain is yelling because he's the instructor.
he's not angry against the yoke, he just tries to show that approach is stabilized
Well he was saying that, Why you move it so often. It still flies straight even if you move it...
He is not getting angry against the yoke; he shows the trainee/co-pilot that the plane flies straight even if he dangles the yoke: "you can dangle it, it will fly straight nevertheless" -- he says.
Its like looking back in time.
Why are the thrust levers moving indipendently on Autothrottle?
so what was that at 3:10 was taht the captain shaking the yoke or the f/o, because that seems like it'd be unconfortable anyways, i know in america the fo is allways on the right but what about here?
people watching this don't realize that the fight engineer is actually вини пух (winnie the pooh)
"Наши летчики - храбрые ребята!..
Они не грустяяяят, наблюдая весь мир
с высоты!" :))))
1-The control over a card!!!
3-mechanization covered
1-here have now entered in глисаду!!!
2-It is let out 45
1-45 it is shone
3-The stabilizer
3-Headlights are let out
3-697 has entered in глисаду headlights are let out to landing it is ready
4-697 landing I resolve
3-697 has understood landing have resolved
3-It is a little above
1-Mode 81!!!
3-Mode 81
3-Speed 280
1-You what for stir a steering wheel?!!!! Hold and do not stir it!!! What for you stir it as on AN-2?!!!
CA is not angry just trying to teach the guy, while making all required calls with FE and radio operator/navigator who is doing callouts that are normally made by computers in modern jets.
FO while quiet, is errogant at times arguing with captain's instructions.
Nav: "glideslope alive"
CA: "Don't descend! Pavel!"
FO: "I'm on glideslope!"
Nav: "not yet, it just came alive"
CA: "Ah come-on, where do you see glideslope? It didn't come to you yet...look where glide slope is" -pointing 2:15
Why is it that the throttle controls are moving by themselves. Do the pilots not control the engines?
he shows, that the autopilot keeps the aircraft on the glide path and on the runway centre line
It not training flight. It is usual flight Moscow - New Urengoj with passengers.
@1VK3 Well in this video the captain on the left is teaching the co-pilot on the right, his pretty strict lol
Nontheless, at the end, the Capitan congratulates the student! That's a teacher!
Moskvich in the sky....
forgot to mention , that I luv the hi-tech "ring ring" to alert of MM, IM! Reminds me of the phones we had here back in the 19th century! LOL!
Dzwonek - signalization of middle marker - 1 km to runway.
Why do Russian planes have bright blue or green painted cockpits? Just curious.
1-reverser
3-скорость250
3-240
3-220
3-200
3-180
3-160
1-small reverser
3-has understood a small reverser
3-150
3-140
1-disconnect a reverser
@electricrailwaygod You can come to Russia and fly 2nd class airlines like UTAir. Unfortunely major russian airlines doesn`t use tu-154 anymore. Love this old fast reliable bird, hope to fly it again too.
hey, this plane had less crashes than many western planes, like DC-10 for instance
looks like engeneer helps, or maybe the AT is on
@RadekCT
That is bullshit.
The safety records for tu-154 are not so bad. Its just that the maintenance of these aircraft can sometimes be poor. The plane itself is great. more than 30 years in service and still carries people safely.
Every plane is intended to crash.
I am looking who is at the door. They keep ringing there. :-)
Okay let's point out something in this video. Poitrenaud BerlinBunker1 and etc all of you who say he's rude you have to ask yourself a couple of question. Do you know how much ride the captain as been taking with him and if he did good on the previous ride or did he acted exactly like in this video? You dont know that and even pilots can get pretty tired of a situation like this
The captain keeps saying:
"Will somebody answer that bloody telephone!"
Lol :D