Thank you for this article I just been reading about the storm shadow and it's German counterpart. They only mentioned it to say that it is capable of bunker busting because it has a dual warhead. The first warhead breaks through The outer layers of the bunker allowing the missile body to penetrate where the main warhead detonates. It was interesting learning more about this weapon.
Looks like the Germans still have their trusty Tornados. I wish we still had them in the UK. Amazing aircraft along with the Harrier. I hope we got a good deal from the US with their f-35s since this is what replaced these two stalwarts.
If you're saying that Taurus is responsible for the attack that is wrong why First Germany hasn't supplied or even pledged to supply Taurus to Ukraine second if you say that storm shadow is responsible same thing almost no weapon have been delivered having just recently been pledge and the attack happened 7 month ago and was proven and stated by both western and russian sources that the bridge was damaged by a truck bomb
Do you mean the Crimean bridge if you were to read BBC you would have realized it got attacked by an unmanned boat because Bridge decks can survive a lorry bomb
With 500km range the Taurus has more than double the range of the Storm Shadow the Ukraine has right now and it is faster also. The orcs will have to move away their air force and supply even further...almost out of combat range
@@Ashwey_069 They probably just need a few. They don`t even have to fire them. The russians knowing that they have them will make a huge difference. Because they suddenly need to protect their valuable assets more. Like a certain bridge. And if one of those hit that bridge ... bargain even for 100 millions.
Storm Shadow offers better advanced imaging, guidance and stealth systems in Ukraine, but Taurus is very effective too - hope they get sent soon, instead of dragging their heels
When these cruise missiles are delivered to ukrainian Nazis you will realize that it is a waste of money. The british morons who delivered Storm Shadow missiles to ukraine found this out earlier. Their missiles failed to change the rules of the game., then they took them apart and realized how they worked. Now they are intercepted and shot down before they hit their target. Germany would not want to experience such an embarrassment. But the United States lied to the Russians that NATO was an alliance for defense. They will give Taurus missiles to ukrainian jewish Nazis and it will again not change the rules of the game in any way. But all the costs will be imposed on ordinary Germans.
Like hitting direct small targets without being detected? You don't need a nuclear bomb to destroy highly relevant strategic point. It can even penetrate buildings in programmed angles and altitude, how is this not a payload
@@alprazo your correct.I just figure that with the expense of this weapon that it could not only be accurate,but also cause more damage without any collateral damage.Just my thought.
In the end both are made by british company MBDA. Storm Shadow was to meet the requirement issued by the French MoD while Taurus was a project between Germany & Sweden.
@@SuperGeronimo999 MBDA is not a british company you moron and Taurus was exclusively designed and build in germany in compliance with the "made in germany" law. the only other country that participated in the development program of Taurus was sweden.
07:03 I wonder how the missile would work if there was also twenty meters of dirt above the bunker. Concrete can't distribute the force very well and so it shatters if a heavy and hard projectile hits it at a great speed. Dirt on the other hand can spread the force more equally and might actually stop the missile faster, or at least more effectively as digging twenty meters further is cheaper than adding ten meters worth of reinforcement concrete? Maybe I am just getting some physics wrong here. I also wonder if you can just make the head covered in aerodynamic shell, which bursts about a second before impact, where a giant screw is revealed that starts spinning and digs the missile deep inside the ground. At that point you don't explode the entire payload, but you make several controlled explosions that are forced into a forward direction and explode at a frequency of around 13Hz, which is a frequency where matter shatters. In this case the missile would dig itself deep under the ground, and then releases a series of 39 explosions at 13Hz over 3 seconds, which would shatter the concrete without the need to first penetrate it. I also wonder how would a liquid hydrogen work for both a fuel and a payload. Let's say the missile can take 400L of liquid hydrogen, you would use however much is needed to travel to the target and then divide the remainder into 13-39 equal parts that will explode at the frequency of 13Hz based upon how deep the bunker is or how large its surface area is (for deep bunkers you would divide the payload into more parts to create a longer lasting shattering effect and for more shallow bunkers you would be better off dealing fewer, but more powerful explosions.)
Are you referring to the Kerch Strait Bridge? If Yes you need a Taurus Cruise Missile warhead on a sea drone and detonate the sea drone Taurus warhead underneath the bridge not on the road deck level because explosion force is sent downwards. Detonating the Taurus Warhead on Sea drone underneath the Kerch strait bridge causes it to collapse as seen in the October 8th 2022 attack
They have 600 designed to stop the Russians, which can be done in Ukraine. Half of them have to be refurbished and modernized. So they can easily replenish their stocks.
Not without EXTENSIVE modification and redesign. At that point, you might aswell develop an entirely new weapon. No, these things are designed to be air-deployed.
A “so called” tandem warhead, it most definitely is a tandem warhead. There is nothing “so called” about it and I think Germany needs a apology for this national insult
La version bridée livrée à l'Ukraine ne vaut que la moitié de son prix. Comme les "strorm shadows" et les "SCALP", si leur portée et (ou) leur charge est réduite, la facture devra aussi être divisée par deux !... Il ne faut pas oublier qu'avec une portée de 500 ou de 1000 km, les missiles de croisière peuvent être tirés loin en arrière de la ligne du front, à l'abri des défenses anti-aériennes de l'ennemi. J'espère que les ukrainiens ne paieront QUE ce qui leur aura été livré...
@@streetscienceofficial8675 Un peu de modestie vous ferait le plus grand bien... Vous n'avez pas "conquis" la France; vous l'avez envahie en 39 et vous en avez été virés en 44. N'oubliez pas non plus la râclée de la première guerre, sans compter les grosses déculottées de la période du 1er Empire... Sans la coalition avec le Royaume Uni, vous parleriez français 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@streetscienceofficial8675mec on est en 2023. Ça fait des décennies que nos pays sont alliés, on bosses ensemble en opération extérieure et on a même une brigade commune. Réveil !
Kalibr is a surface-to-surface missile. Taurus and Shadow Storm are air-to-surface. You need a plane to deploy them. The invaders will feel the wrath of these missile soon.
I wonder if Ukrainian Aeroplanes of Russian origin can be used to carry them just like AGM-88 Su-27 AGM-65 Su-25? If yes KEPD-350 Su-24 Ukrainian Air Force to destroy Wagner Group Mercenaries Russian army hardened Aeroplane hangers ammo depots. To take out the Kerch Bridge the KEPD-350 warhead mounted on a kamikaze boat since Bridge decks are not designed to protect themselves from an explosion underneath them. Because deonating this inside a lorry results in the bridge being intact
Ukrainian Su-24s are already carrying British Strorm Shadow cruise missiles, so why not? *Edit, like Storm Shadow, Taurus is probably too heavy for any other platform to carry.
They've been modifying the Mig-29 to deploy NATO weapons but with some reduced capabilities (i.e. having to rely on the internal guidance of the missiles rather than a continuous link between the radar on the aircraft and the missile). Once the F-16's arrive we will see them all be used to their full potential.
@snapdragon6601 so you mean the following combination can be used by the Ukrainians Storm Shadow or Taurus KEPD-350 with is compatible with F-16 thanks to NATO standard electronic systems. For the KEPD-350 it has to be aimed at the Kerch Bridge supports if the Ukrainians want a part of it weakened.
@@EpicThe112 I'm simply stating that MiG-29, Su-27 and Su-25 aren't able to carry Storm Shadow, (and probably Taurus), because it's either too big to fit under the belly with the gear down, or too heavy to carry under the wings, hence why only the Su-24 can carry Storm Shadow.
@pegamini Mismanagement. Especially when it comes to the procurement and amount ammunition, but also state and amount of some of the vehicles. The skills are top of the line, but there are many problems which need to be addressed and thankfully this seems to happen right now.
Not sure if this exists, but a missile that can drill into hundreds of metres of earth before detonating - deployed under parachute for the last 50 metres, the outer casing is a drilling machine, inside are high explosives.
I guess it's not that simple. To programme and maintain the cruise missile, German soldiers would have to go to Ukraine and help prepare for the launch of Taurus. This would turn them into combatants and Germany would risk going to war, which must be prevented in any case. The deployment of German soldiers in war zones must be approved by the Bundestag, although Olaf Scholz's coalition has the majority, other parties could have this decision reviewed in a lawsuit to the German Supreme Court. The Supreme Court could ban the use of the weapon in Ukraine.
Taurus is a partnership between MBDA Deutschland GmbH and Saab Bofors Dynamics.
Yup… KEDP 350 Taurus👍🏻
Developed by Germany and Sweden (TAURUS Systems GmbH / Saab Bofors Dynamics) and manufactured in Germany.
Germany weapons is deadly beautyfull...🇩🇪❤️
True. It's a good job they're on the right side this time.
Много его осталось в СССР.
True ❤
It hurts to imagine the price of the Taurus in Porsches: 1 Taurus = 8 Porsche 911 xO
Or a dream house.
Send it! Glory to Ukraine from friends in the United States 🙂👍🇺🇦/🇺🇸/🇩🇪
Do you want my car too i also have a wife live on your own 😡
You don’t have anyone you love?
From Bulgaria ....❤❤❤❤❤....support...yeeeer
Slavaaaa Ukrainaa...
So it ends up in Russian hands? Hah
Thank you for this article I just been reading about the storm shadow and it's German counterpart. They only mentioned it to say that it is capable of bunker busting because it has a dual warhead. The first warhead breaks through The outer layers of the bunker allowing the missile body to penetrate where the main warhead detonates.
It was interesting learning more about this weapon.
yes it's a storm shadow with a tomahawk engine, that's why the range is so much higher.
Storm Shadow does that as well. So hopefully this video explains the difference.
Дорогі колеги, надайте Україні даного типу ракети, вони нам дуже знадобляться 💪🇺🇦
Вам дуде потрибна дурка и поскорее
'Taurus' is a great missile. That's no bull!
A coffin with a warhead and wings!
great for hitting Crimean bridge.
Better for hitting Kremlin. But Ukraine better not do that or Putin will complain that Ukraine is bombing his capital city.
cry 😂@@tlangdon12
So glad the Luftwaffe is on our side now
Now?
We are happy to stand next to our allies to fend off danger - again
Looks like the Germans still have their trusty Tornados. I wish we still had them in the UK.
Amazing aircraft along with the Harrier. I hope we got a good deal from the US with their f-35s since this is what replaced these two stalwarts.
Ja, bitte! Unleash the Taurus.
From Uruguay with love!
Kursk bridge anyone?
If you're saying that Taurus is responsible for the attack that is wrong why
First Germany hasn't supplied or even pledged to supply Taurus to Ukraine second if you say that storm shadow is responsible same thing almost no weapon have been delivered having just recently been pledge and the attack happened 7 month ago and was proven and stated by both western and russian sources that the bridge was damaged by a truck bomb
Do you mean the Crimean bridge if you were to read BBC you would have realized it got attacked by an unmanned boat because Bridge decks can survive a lorry bomb
*kerch straight bridge ??
@@AlexdaCunhaIt could destroy the city of Kiev
Ahahahah shaha ,,, a ponte vai pelos ares e os moskóvios ou fogem antes ou vão a nadar para a rússia senão morrem todos.
the taurus knows where it is
Любители ракетной техники подтянулись
It knows where it is by knowing where it isn't
TODAY... A VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO YOU SIR/ MA'AM
How is it on bridges?
Generally pretty good. Hit a support column and turn it into a non-supporting column.
specifically 11 mile long bridges that go over water
@@dazamanday and ships, too.
till now i didn't see anyone mention it on yt, but it has anti ship capabilities and can hit moving targets, too.
It is made to destroy concrete structures, so THE bridge is made of concrete^^
The roket is a bunker buster.
Wow! That is a awesome weapon.😮👍🇺🇦🇺🇲🇩🇪🇬🇧
As a german, finally get this to Ukraine!
Some guys in that video look very rock'n'roll.
Team Elvis Deutschland.
0:28 directly the telephone number of the fire brigade on the wall 😂
And the underground kitchen was shred to bits!
With 500km range the Taurus has more than double the range of the Storm Shadow the Ukraine has right now and it is faster also. The orcs will have to move away their air force and supply even further...almost out of combat range
The range of the Storm Shadow is 550 km, export versions are 300 km
@@knightsnight5929 it will be a special kind of export. Both will be used in Crimea. The planes will deploy the missile before reaching the Black Sea.
@@knightsnight5929 300+ nm according to RAF... means 555+ km.
Nazis 🤣😂
Taurus has an un official range of 700km. the official range is 500+km
200 Taurus Cruise. Missiles ready for Ukraine Air Force
German and swedish*
Saab Bofors dynamics was part of developing this missile.
Just like with the Nlaw, media never gives Sweden credit
that's true, but I think Sweden can live with that. Not everybody needs the permanent spotlite on the stage.
The Tornado I’d gorgeous!
The Penetrator 😁
😂😂
But for Pootler, only without lube!
Namaste sir/ ma'am good evening ... watching from India sir
Please send these to the Ukrainian Air Force, would look nice on the centre pylon of a Mig-29 ;-)
each of these missiles cost a million euro, i really doubt they send them
They're too heavy for Flanker, Fulcrum and Frogfoot, hence why only Ukrainian Su-24s are carrying British Storm Shadow missiles.
@@Ashwey_069
They probably just need a few. They don`t even have to fire them. The russians knowing that they have them will make a huge difference. Because they suddenly need to protect their valuable assets more. Like a certain bridge. And if one of those hit that bridge ... bargain even for 100 millions.
Storm Shadow offers better advanced imaging, guidance and stealth systems in Ukraine, but Taurus is very effective too - hope they get sent soon, instead of dragging their heels
@@firstbloood1 democracy son
@@firstbloood1 the people... with their tax and lives.
@@attilazk no
@@firstbloood1 the russians on the receiving end😊
@@firstbloood1 the Russians will pay the most haha
I just think that the mega price of this weapon should have a much greater payload.
When these cruise missiles are delivered to ukrainian Nazis you will realize that it is a waste of money. The british morons who delivered Storm Shadow missiles to ukraine found this out earlier. Their missiles failed to change the rules of the game., then they took them apart and realized how they worked. Now they are intercepted and shot down before they hit their target. Germany would not want to experience such an embarrassment. But the United States lied to the Russians that NATO was an alliance for defense. They will give Taurus missiles to ukrainian jewish Nazis and it will again not change the rules of the game in any way. But all the costs will be imposed on ordinary Germans.
Like hitting direct small targets without being detected? You don't need a nuclear bomb to destroy highly relevant strategic point. It can even penetrate buildings in programmed angles and altitude, how is this not a payload
@@alprazo your correct.I just figure that with the expense of this weapon that it could not only be accurate,but also cause more damage without any collateral damage.Just my thought.
Storm shadow, is history now !!..
guess who invented rocket science and cruise missiles 😁
and, your point is?
The germans
@@jboydayz my point is not to forget who`s your dad.dy
@@lattehour not really
Wernher von Braun a Nazi German who brought the American on the moon. Without him it wouldn't happen so early. He developed the V1 and V2.
I thought the storm shadow was decent and then here the germans come and blow it out the park look at the penetration
In the end both are made by british company MBDA. Storm Shadow was to meet the requirement issued by the French MoD while Taurus was a project between Germany & Sweden.
@@SuperGeronimo999 MBDA is not a british company you moron and Taurus was exclusively designed and build in germany in compliance with the "made in germany" law. the only other country that participated in the development program of Taurus was sweden.
Mdba is not technically an un company it’s a transeuropean company with its headquarters in France
07:03 I wonder how the missile would work if there was also twenty meters of dirt above the bunker. Concrete can't distribute the force very well and so it shatters if a heavy and hard projectile hits it at a great speed. Dirt on the other hand can spread the force more equally and might actually stop the missile faster, or at least more effectively as digging twenty meters further is cheaper than adding ten meters worth of reinforcement concrete? Maybe I am just getting some physics wrong here. I also wonder if you can just make the head covered in aerodynamic shell, which bursts about a second before impact, where a giant screw is revealed that starts spinning and digs the missile deep inside the ground. At that point you don't explode the entire payload, but you make several controlled explosions that are forced into a forward direction and explode at a frequency of around 13Hz, which is a frequency where matter shatters. In this case the missile would dig itself deep under the ground, and then releases a series of 39 explosions at 13Hz over 3 seconds, which would shatter the concrete without the need to first penetrate it. I also wonder how would a liquid hydrogen work for both a fuel and a payload. Let's say the missile can take 400L of liquid hydrogen, you would use however much is needed to travel to the target and then divide the remainder into 13-39 equal parts that will explode at the frequency of 13Hz based upon how deep the bunker is or how large its surface area is (for deep bunkers you would divide the payload into more parts to create a longer lasting shattering effect and for more shallow bunkers you would be better off dealing fewer, but more powerful explosions.)
ruSS bridge would love to be warmed up by several of those beauties! Please send them immediately 🙏🙏
Niemals bekommen die Ukrainer diese Waffe.
I think it’s time we see if this can destroy the bridge.
Are you referring to the Kerch Strait Bridge? If Yes you need a Taurus Cruise Missile warhead on a sea drone and detonate the sea drone Taurus warhead underneath the bridge not on the road deck level because explosion force is sent downwards. Detonating the Taurus Warhead on Sea drone underneath the Kerch strait bridge causes it to collapse as seen in the October 8th 2022 attack
Perfect for Winnie & Pootin's bunkers!
why is kurtzgesaght explaining a long range weapon?
kurzgesagt means tldr 😂
send it to Ukraine to test it satisfaction...
Is that the narrator from Kurzgesagt??
Is the narrator the guy from Kurzgesagt?
Has Germany given Ukraine any of these? Does the Luftwaffe have enough to give? Stop talking the talk and start walking the walk Germany.
They haven't got. According to Bild the Luftwaffe have ~600 overall and 300+ of them are combat ready.
They have 600 designed to stop the Russians, which can be done in Ukraine. Half of them have to be refurbished and modernized. So they can easily replenish their stocks.
Germany, please give some to Ukraine. Please.
🇺🇦🔱💪🏻🇩🇪❤
Holy Moses it’s huge and looks like some future weapon! Bring it China and Russia!!!
Say, can this be fitted on top of a GMLRS or an ATACMS?
Not without EXTENSIVE modification and redesign. At that point, you might aswell develop an entirely new weapon. No, these things are designed to be air-deployed.
no, but it's a cruise missile that can navigate on its own, you could just drop it out of an airbus 😂
I came to see if people were still posting "they used this on September 11th" comments.
Bravo NATO, GLORY Ukraine🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 Glory Germany🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
d germans haven't given a green light yet
Zelensky: “ we will take 200 of these badboys”👍🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
A “so called” tandem warhead, it most definitely is a tandem warhead. There is nothing “so called” about it and I think Germany needs a apology for this national insult
?
0:46 wait a minute I have heard this voice actor before 😂
It was a Bunker Buster that impacted the Pentagon.
La version bridée livrée à l'Ukraine ne vaut que la moitié de son prix.
Comme les "strorm shadows" et les "SCALP", si leur portée et (ou) leur charge est réduite, la facture devra aussi être divisée par deux !...
Il ne faut pas oublier qu'avec une portée de 500 ou de 1000 km, les missiles de croisière peuvent être tirés loin en arrière de la ligne du front, à l'abri des défenses anti-aériennes de l'ennemi.
J'espère que les ukrainiens ne paieront QUE ce qui leur aura été livré...
France never win great Battle hallo from Deutschland or German zuper krieg we never forget how we Conquer France in war World 2
Go Sleep France
🦅🇩🇪🇩🇪
@@streetscienceofficial8675 Un peu de modestie vous ferait le plus grand bien...
Vous n'avez pas "conquis" la France; vous l'avez envahie en 39 et vous en avez été virés en 44.
N'oubliez pas non plus la râclée de la première guerre, sans compter les grosses déculottées de la période du 1er Empire...
Sans la coalition avec le Royaume Uni, vous parleriez français 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@streetscienceofficial8675mec on est en 2023. Ça fait des décennies que nos pays sont alliés, on bosses ensemble en opération extérieure et on a même une brigade commune. Réveil !
SLAVA UKRAINI. MORE WEAPONS MOREEE TO UKRAINE TO FIGHT INVADERS.
Donate them to Ukraine along with a few Tornadoes
What the difference with Russian kalibr?
That it will be used for rightful purposes and not to terrorize Ukrainian civilians in their cities?
they work
Kalibr is a surface-to-surface missile. Taurus and Shadow Storm are air-to-surface. You need a plane to deploy them. The invaders will feel the wrath of these missile soon.
Its No crap from fuckkia
Bye bye Kerch bridge
Still using tornadoes?
Yes. But they're going to be replaced with F35 now.
Yeah. It's the only aircraft in service certified for nuclear sharing
Ok thanks
@@Vatnik_tschistilka username 👌
@@splodge561 They are about to be replaced by F35s and EWS Typhoons, so their days are numbered.
Yes..send it..ukraine sure can use a few taurus for the bridge!
Ausgezeichnet. Senden nach Ukraine.
Taurus for Ukraine 🇺🇦 now
Ukrayna needs these very much!!
Please send at least 100 to beautiful Ukrainian defenders! 🙏🙏
👍👍
I wonder if Ukrainian Aeroplanes of Russian origin can be used to carry them just like AGM-88 Su-27 AGM-65 Su-25? If yes KEPD-350 Su-24 Ukrainian Air Force to destroy Wagner Group Mercenaries Russian army hardened Aeroplane hangers ammo depots. To take out the Kerch Bridge the KEPD-350 warhead mounted on a kamikaze boat since Bridge decks are not designed to protect themselves from an explosion underneath them. Because deonating this inside a lorry results in the bridge being intact
Ukrainian Su-24s are already carrying British Strorm Shadow cruise missiles, so why not? *Edit, like Storm Shadow, Taurus is probably too heavy for any other platform to carry.
They've been modifying the Mig-29 to deploy NATO weapons but with some reduced capabilities (i.e. having to rely on the internal guidance of the missiles rather than a continuous link between the radar on the aircraft and the missile). Once the F-16's arrive we will see them all be used to their full potential.
@snapdragon6601 so you mean the following combination can be used by the Ukrainians Storm Shadow or Taurus KEPD-350 with is compatible with F-16 thanks to NATO standard electronic systems. For the KEPD-350 it has to be aimed at the Kerch Bridge supports if the Ukrainians want a part of it weakened.
@@EpicThe112 I'm simply stating that MiG-29, Su-27 and Su-25 aren't able to carry Storm Shadow, (and probably Taurus), because it's either too big to fit under the belly with the gear down, or too heavy to carry under the wings, hence why only the Su-24 can carry Storm Shadow.
this is a cruise missile, you could literally just yeet it out of a commercial airbus and it would find its way
Pretty surprised by the numbers of 600 pcs. I thought, we have a defensive army. If you add the state of the Bundeswehr, it's even more "impressive".
What do those weapon systems have to do with the strategic orientation of an army? No contradiction at all.
@@hungabastahdeluxe3751 If you can't see it, then I can't help you anyway.
Well, if the potential enemy has thousands of fighter jets...
@pegamini Mismanagement. Especially when it comes to the procurement and amount ammunition, but also state and amount of some of the vehicles.
The skills are top of the line, but there are many problems which need to be addressed and thankfully this seems to happen right now.
With a offencive weapon you can defend yoir country.... and if you waould like to know how i know.... I serve.
Su-24 says: "Oh hi there?*
Not sure if this exists, but a missile that can drill into hundreds of metres of earth before detonating - deployed under parachute for the last 50 metres, the outer casing is a drilling machine, inside are high explosives.
I think the US is developing exactly this, to bomb China
Sure it exits the hobos from poorkraine want them to start ww3 🤬
Soo how big do you wanna make this weapon system to fuel the drill?
You are playing too much warhammer 40k
@@d.o.g573 You wait - someone in the Pentagon will announce this as a project shortly due to my utterly brilliant idea. ;-)
По-сути с доп баками должно долететь до путинского бункера в гелинджеке.
Send it
Why it's Fritz X , 2023
Too much talk, the only important section in the vid start from the 6th minute
Taurus, like a bull in a China shop. It’s going to get messy.
Where to BUY( kaufen)
Aldi
Neckermann
Who's here after Germany approved donating this to Ukraine to escalate the war?
ship it to Ukraine pls
No !
Crimean Bridge will definitely like it!
pak přijde ruská odveta a nebude mnichov !.
Give them to Ukraine too.
Send them everything you've got, all at once, now!
ukrain need that missail,sent 100 to zelensky
Der bettler bekommt nix ausser hohn 😂
@@Paynis855 Der einzige, der rumflennt ist Putin. Stimmt’s Drachenlord?
vivat rosia and putin !.
KERCH BRIDGE!!! 😁😁😁
It has a siren to scare the population
Opps a hole in the Kertch bridge
Taurus is 33% owned by SAAB.......
Great ..as long as America lets you use their satellite data and GPS signals ..
Just realised you need to refuel this! You kidding right?😅
Taurus💪💪💪
Why was is fired in south africa?
It looks like a flying canoe. 😁
Don't you just love Putin for supplying Nato with a nice training ground for its weapons 😁😜THANKS VALADIMAR LMAO
Also used by South Korea by the F-15K Slam Eagle.
Ja made in germany gibt es noch ^^
One old man from Russia really want to get this
where is putin's bunker?
In Berlin
PL:EASE take out Putin's bunkers with these!
Send the TAURUS and the Tornado to Ukraine they’re needed now…ASAP…
I guess it's not that simple. To programme and maintain the cruise missile, German soldiers would have to go to Ukraine and help prepare for the launch of Taurus.
This would turn them into combatants and Germany would risk going to war, which must be prevented in any case.
The deployment of German soldiers in war zones must be approved by the Bundestag, although Olaf Scholz's coalition has the majority, other parties could have this decision reviewed in a lawsuit to the German Supreme Court. The Supreme Court could ban the use of the weapon in Ukraine.
why near south africa
Give it to Ukraine
Ahorita
Why don't they give it to Ukraine?
Bro!!!!!
These missiles are old and too slow. There's no way it's going to get past a new anti stealth s400 missile defense system.