These are not great times for a car that's rated at 11.6 from the factory. It also looks like it has Renntech badges on it. I have the same car, and have a best of 11.4 with a tune and air filters...
@@Stupidboi1 I'm not sure how that applies to my comment... The 11.6 time is from Mercedes directly, and my times were similar. Both are considerably faster than what was posted in the video.
@@frankvillegas6730 Yes, I saw that and mentioned it in my comment. The times do not reflect it though. The car should be faster than stock with a flash tune, this one is not.
As a person with a tuned E63 AMG S, this is definitely not Renntech tuned. If it is tuned, its stage 1 and horrible driver. My car would have walked all of these cars, and thats not even using Launch Control. Just sayin
It doesn't sound like Race Start is being used. It's certainly not easy to activate during staging, but it's possible. I was cutting 1.75-1.8 60 foot times, these looked slower than that. Even stock it should be hitting 11.8 with Race Start on a hot day/high humidity.
These AMG cars are over rated. 11.9 to 12.2 at around 116-117 is appropriate for a 4400 lbs car with 550 hp. If, as many have “claimed”, the post 2014 and up cls63s make closer to 600-620 hp based on dynos, I would say, NOPE. All the 1/4 runs I’ve seen in here and in person back that up. Even a Weistec biG turbo car with 900 hp can’t run quicker than 10.8 and no faster than 135 mph. A 2018+ Mustang 5.0 supercharged with 750 hp runs low 10’s at 140+
@@Stupidboi1 I agree, that's what I did in my car. I was highlighting that the driver in this video would likely have run a faster time with RS activated based on their ET.
So many non track drag racers in here don’t understand reaction has no factor in the numbers. And this is not right side vs left, it’s each lane for themselves. Time doesn’t start until each vehicle crosses the beam. I could sit there for 1 minute after the other vehicle launches and still run quicker and faster. This is not a competition drag event pitting one against the other. It’s open drags.
I'm a benz owner and I agree it looks like the Cls is sporting renntech badges... if so I'm ashamed it wasn't doing 10's. I can also say the Camaro sounds heavily molded! All the cats were impressive streetable cars. I've beat similar coup camaros with my older N/A CLS550 anything is possible and most likely probable! As for the badges as with any vehicle they're just that (Badges) it's all about what's under the hood, in the transmission and diff, to the tune, reaction time and grip!
The old 5.5 TT V8 AMG 63's are slugs. Can't be made very quick or fast. The newer 4.0 TT V8 AMG's post 2018+ are rocket's. Benz over rated the AMG 5.5 TT engine. The newer AMG 4.0 TT is more on par with its advertised 603 hp. Probably still slightly over rated though as I've seen a few on dynos, estimating 585-590 crank hp instead of 603.
How does his trap speed go from 115-120 in different runs? Was the final run done with a tune?
1:03 most probably the first start at same time drag race I have ever seen.
Benz all the way
These are not great times for a car that's rated at 11.6 from the factory. It also looks like it has Renntech badges on it. I have the same car, and have a best of 11.4 with a tune and air filters...
Magazines tend to overrate performance specs to help the brand sell.
@@Stupidboi1 I'm not sure how that applies to my comment... The 11.6 time is from Mercedes directly, and my times were similar. Both are considerably faster than what was posted in the video.
@@GraySeeIsMe renntech tune
@@frankvillegas6730 Yes, I saw that and mentioned it in my comment. The times do not reflect it though. The car should be faster than stock with a flash tune, this one is not.
As a person with a tuned E63 AMG S, this is definitely not Renntech tuned. If it is tuned, its stage 1 and horrible driver. My car would have walked all of these cars, and thats not even using Launch Control. Just sayin
It doesn't sound like Race Start is being used. It's certainly not easy to activate during staging, but it's possible. I was cutting 1.75-1.8 60 foot times, these looked slower than that. Even stock it should be hitting 11.8 with Race Start on a hot day/high humidity.
Stage 2 E63s does 1/4 miles in 10.9 with dragy😝
These AMG cars are over rated. 11.9 to 12.2 at around 116-117 is appropriate for a 4400 lbs car with 550 hp. If, as many have “claimed”, the post 2014 and up cls63s make closer to 600-620 hp based on dynos, I would say, NOPE. All the 1/4 runs I’ve seen in here and in person back that up. Even a Weistec biG turbo car with 900 hp can’t run quicker than 10.8 and no faster than 135 mph. A 2018+ Mustang 5.0 supercharged with 750 hp runs low 10’s at 140+
@@GraySeeIsMe race start will not get the quickest launch out of these cars. Sport+ and brake boosting does.
@@Stupidboi1 I agree, that's what I did in my car. I was highlighting that the driver in this video would likely have run a faster time with RS activated based on their ET.
Also, the pre 4matic rwd only models will pull on and pass the 4matic due to being 175 lbs lighter.
No traction you can over come the wight with a power increase so that is not a excuse and the wight is nothing
What happened to c7?
I love my CLS
Ofc Benz is eating up all the competition. 😈😈
Not the Camaro
Gotta check the tune ups tbh I bet the cls is going there as is and all those cars are tuned up mad crazy
@@AirKaos the camaro literally had to do a burnout before the race 😂😂
And? Dude is racing a fuckin 500+hp AWD monster with RWD and street tires and about 50 hp short... lmao.
Not it’s not lol put it up against a redeye hellcat or a gt500 and see how it does
At 1:23 there's a 2018+ mustang 5.0 with the 10 spd auto. It was stock and dusted the modded 63 S, lol.
That shit isn’t stock
2016 sedan vs 2018 coupe and the amg had a bad launch
That's not a stock Mustang
///AMG
First Mustang beat him off the line, which is impressive on it’s own.
I think the zo6 driver is new at this dissponted
Wat year is that
looks like 2014-2017 based off body style but i could be wrong
@@NoahMeyer nah ur right fam
I just came here to watch some crowd killers get smoked by the Benz.
So many non track drag racers in here don’t understand reaction has no factor in the numbers. And this is not right side vs left, it’s each lane for themselves. Time doesn’t start until each vehicle crosses the beam. I could sit there for 1 minute after the other vehicle launches and still run quicker and faster. This is not a competition drag event pitting one against the other. It’s open drags.
Cls awd or rwd
AWD
Awd (4matic)
2014- 2018 awd 2013 and lower year rwd
@@Jejssjdkk thx for that
its tuned by RENNTECH so
High altitude means higher numbers, however, idk why he didn't dog walk them all
The black Camaro and Mustang wasn't not playing around.
👑👑BENZ👑👑!!
Is this CLS RWD? it´s slower than a stock 4Matic, or really not tunned.
4matic. def not tuned.
CLS 63s is the fastest here, but reaction time was few times very bad from AMG driver
Reaction is not a part of the run.
It is…
Cls63 wolf
CLS driver has a really slow reaction time
Reaction has nothing to do with it. Timer doesn’t start until the vehicle crosses the beam. 60 foots are the huge factor at start.
⚔️
💪💪💪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪💪💪💪
Hah the damn convertible Camaro beat the Benz. I own one. Bitch is fast.
Yea but it’s still just a Camaro when you get it home
@@jimdandy9118 says the guy who probably drives a 2007 Hyundai Accent
Probably owns a v6 camaro and tells everyone it’s fast 😂
@@diablocls55 go ahead and look at my channel big talker
I'm a benz owner and I agree it looks like the Cls is sporting renntech badges... if so I'm ashamed it wasn't doing 10's. I can also say the Camaro sounds heavily molded! All the cats were impressive streetable cars. I've beat similar coup camaros with my older N/A CLS550 anything is possible and most likely probable! As for the badges as with any vehicle they're just that (Badges) it's all about what's under the hood, in the transmission and diff, to the tune, reaction time and grip!
The old 5.5 TT V8 AMG 63's are slugs. Can't be made very quick or fast. The newer 4.0 TT V8 AMG's post 2018+ are rocket's. Benz over rated the AMG 5.5 TT engine. The newer AMG 4.0 TT is more on par with its advertised 603 hp. Probably still slightly over rated though as I've seen a few on dynos, estimating 585-590 crank hp instead of 603.
You can update the PCM to make 700+ hp and 800+ lb-ft with a $3k tune on the M157. This driver is either stock or just bad
Tell me you’re dumb af without telling me
It’s kinda dumb to mod a car so dang heavy.
For that kind of price it’s barely pulling away from a 40k mustang and Camaro 😆
Keep in mind that's is a luxury first type of car and 4,500 lbs
the CLS is also a 40k car. :/
CAMARO ALWAYS WİNNER
HAHA your stupid Camaro lost it no win HAHAHA Camaro ungly
Bwahahahahaha... What do you drive? A fucking Yugo? Camaros suck balls, my commie little friend.
Camaro still whooped the bens ass y’all just hating
Bad reaction time from AMG driver bro