@@RyansRockin All of Nathan's WTC 7 videos are saved near the end of the playlist. I also have some rare WTC 7 footage in that playlist from the user named Pre-911 WTC.
It's very visible in the movie Working Girl, Melanie Griffiths character works in the building (not entirely sure if all the interior office shots were filmed there though.)
Why is it so so hard to find material of WTC7 before 9/11? I havent seen any content of the interior at all, in spite of it being considered an important NY landmark before the attacks. Thanks for this upload, its a hidden gem.
@@djoldsoulkid3407 I've looked but can't find it. It showed suits being served and generally being quite blunt & rude with cafeteria workers. Me I would never be rude to someone who's making my food, that's the last person you wanna upset haha
@@visionist7 seems like a lot of people think the higher up you work in a skyscraper, the more important you think of yourself. I've met some nasty people that think because their office is high up they're somehow worth more as humans.
Bro I get it. But just know they took the biggest fucking job to build the freedom tower. They took a long time just to get to the freedom tower. You need to stop hating.
Woah, those construction workers are tough guys. I injured my back at work and I still suffer from pain- that was at a simple medical job which was such an instant emergency that I failed to bend my knees, instead just reaching forward. Did my back in. Couldn't even stand straight for 3 days- I was literally stuck almost fully bent over.
When the building was designed, it was expected that the sprinklers would keep any fire under control, it would take an epic disaster to cause a fire and simultaneously cut off the water mains (which is what happened when the towers fell). That building had state-of-the-art fire protection but it was starved of water and they decided to just let it burn rather than risk sending people in.
I guess none of the conspiracy theorists are going to mention the glaring problem with WTC 7- a 47 story building being built on top of a 1967 Con-Edison substation with a smaller foot-print?
building 7 is build with very light I beams and corrugated steel panels for the floors and had no foundations only built on top of con edison subsation and had to spand large spaces over the main cargo ramp to the basements of the bathtub , steel structures expand with heat and whan the fires start to decrease they contract and snap violently
@@TheAbderaman Fire doesn’t do that dummy. It was demolished. The whole complex was demolished. No other building except 2 were because of proximity to the buildings. Remember, it was a terrorist attack. It was first attacked in 1993.
@@pm52067 WTC might have been demolished, but the whole complex wasn’t. (Unless you mean them demolishing the remaining damaged buildings after 9/11 on the site)
Hi Sunshine, these guys have big brass Ones no doubt about it. But building a City out of Solid Stone knowing each stone's capabilities exact composition size an make up, some weighing up to an over 100tons placement in exactly where predetermined location where astrological and compass positioning requirements. Along with golden ratio distance to the Moon, Sun, Speed of Light just to name a few incorporated into the building structures in both metric and standard measurements with only Ropes Animals and Wood. Our Ancient Ancestors did it, with big brass ______. Maybe brains? May peace an prosperity be with you always.
There is no way that fire caused that building to fall at freefall for 2.25 seconds according to NIST - 8 stories, 105 feet/32 meters. FREEFALL CAN ONLY HAPPEN TO A FIRE-PROTECTED STRUCTURAL STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING VIA CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. Think critically and don't listen to the media or trolls.
It will depends on how hot the fire is…. You say have your theories all day (which is very disrespectful) still don’t negate the fact that plane fuel can get pretty how
Nice to see something other than the destruction of this building. Hard to find footage and even pictures of the interior for that matter...
Check out Nathan9104, he has like 4 or 5 videos of the WTC 7. Most of them interior.
@@RyansRockin I know. In fact, I created a pre-9/11 WTC playlist with over 900 videos: th-cam.com/play/PL0eed6xXhuPXtztuctOv6lq--sjYsxhZe.html
@@Galidorquest WTC 7?
@@RyansRockin All of Nathan's WTC 7 videos are saved near the end of the playlist. I also have some rare WTC 7 footage in that playlist from the user named Pre-911 WTC.
It's very visible in the movie Working Girl, Melanie Griffiths character works in the building (not entirely sure if all the interior office shots were filmed there though.)
I want to see wtc 3 Marriott construction
These workers wouldnt know that their work will last for 14 years and destroyed in seconds WTC-7 is my favourite wtc tower...
Same bro
86
RIP All those buildings of the complex destroyed demolished that complex was so perfect
They weren't really fully appreciated in their day. WTC 7 was still fairly new, only 13 years old. The new one is 16 now.
Thanks for the upload. Beautiful history, great people.
These videos are gold. Thank you!!
Why is it so so hard to find material of WTC7 before 9/11? I havent seen any content of the interior at all, in spite of it being considered an important NY landmark before the attacks. Thanks for this upload, its a hidden gem.
There's cafeteria footage on TH-cam, during the hurricane warning in 1999 I think
@@visionist7oh? Link?!
@@djoldsoulkid3407 I've looked but can't find it. It showed suits being served and generally being quite blunt & rude with cafeteria workers. Me I would never be rude to someone who's making my food, that's the last person you wanna upset haha
@@djoldsoulkid3407 th-cam.com/video/RrvsmGF0pnw/w-d-xo.html
@@visionist7 seems like a lot of people think the higher up you work in a skyscraper, the more important you think of yourself. I've met some nasty people that think because their office is high up they're somehow worth more as humans.
Only stood for 14 years. A real shame
Fun fact: That building was more beautiful and amazing that the *_SHIT WE HAVE TODAY WITH THE FREEDOM TOWER!!!!_*
Why is this giving me flashbacks of the new Yorkers hateing the world trade center
Bro I get it. But just know they took the biggest fucking job to build the freedom tower. They took a long time just to get to the freedom tower. You need to stop hating.
86
first time I ever seen this footage tnx :)
I wonder the reactions of these people when their hard work turned to dust
Heartbreak
Frustration
Anger
86
Thank you for this video.
Thank you...important information here
1:28 that new york accent
Bet those guys thought that building would last longer than 13 years.
Woah, those construction workers are tough guys. I injured my back at work and I still suffer from pain- that was at a simple medical job which was such an instant emergency that I failed to bend my knees, instead just reaching forward. Did my back in. Couldn't even stand straight for 3 days- I was literally stuck almost fully bent over.
WTC 7 1986-2001
What's the music at 0:36?
That’s where they got the World Trade Center cross after 9-11.
3:26 that's a lot of blinking ma'am. You need a cold shower
It actually starts at 0:26
They know how to build buildings that won't collapse due to fire because 22 tons of steel won't melt
Yes, steel can melt after hour
steel melts at a temperature of 2,777 degrees Fahrenheit, but jet fuel burns at only 1,517 but no plane hit wtc7 so you sound like an idiot
But steel can weaken....
@@generalgrievous3066 , lol
When the building was designed, it was expected that the sprinklers would keep any fire under control, it would take an epic disaster to cause a fire and simultaneously cut off the water mains (which is what happened when the towers fell). That building had state-of-the-art fire protection but it was starved of water and they decided to just let it burn rather than risk sending people in.
Wtc 7 86
Is this the one that collapsed?
Yes the original wtc 7
86
I guess none of the conspiracy theorists are going to mention the glaring problem with WTC 7- a 47 story building being built on top of a 1967 Con-Edison substation with a smaller foot-print?
building 7 is build with very light I beams and corrugated steel panels for the floors and had no foundations only built on top of con edison subsation and had to spand large spaces over the main cargo ramp to the basements of the bathtub , steel structures expand with heat and whan the fires start to decrease they contract and snap violently
Thank you for highlighting reality!
@@TheAbderaman Fire doesn’t do that dummy. It was demolished. The whole complex was demolished. No other building except 2 were because of proximity to the buildings. Remember, it was a terrorist attack. It was first attacked in 1993.
Si Alex.todavía no comenzó la construcción de 7 etc en 1967 pero en 1986 si porque es el comienzo y se inauguró en 1987
@@pm52067 WTC might have been demolished, but the whole complex wasn’t. (Unless you mean them demolishing the remaining damaged buildings after 9/11 on the site)
Hi Sunshine, these guys have big brass Ones no doubt about it. But building a City out of Solid Stone knowing each stone's capabilities exact composition size an make up, some weighing up to an over 100tons placement in exactly where predetermined location where astrological and compass positioning requirements. Along with golden ratio distance to the Moon, Sun, Speed of Light just to name a few incorporated into the building structures in both metric and standard measurements with only Ropes Animals and Wood. Our Ancient Ancestors did it, with big brass ______. Maybe brains? May peace an prosperity be with you always.
There is no way that fire caused that building to fall at freefall for 2.25 seconds according to NIST - 8 stories, 105 feet/32 meters.
FREEFALL CAN ONLY HAPPEN TO A FIRE-PROTECTED STRUCTURAL STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING VIA CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. Think critically and don't listen to the media or trolls.
Yep, I knew it from day one. It was "pulled". Classic controlled demolition, done as an insurance fraud.
Y todo ese trabajo fue en vano
Porque ese edificio tan moderno para su época, no paso de los 14 años
Cool
Grand.
I would ask anyone to put a steel beam made for buildings over a large fire for 7 hours. See how much it can bend..answer: it won’t.
It will depends on how hot the fire is…. You say have your theories all day (which is very disrespectful) still don’t negate the fact that plane fuel can get pretty how
86
fish gang
You missed the part where they put in the explosives. 😉
Pls get your ass out of here
AYO HOLD UP😊
Are you slow? This is the construction of the building, not 9/11. Get it right.
86