Ideal in conjunction with a rifle with night vision capabilities , once you spot a heat signature you can turn the Ir light and night vision scope to see in more detail what is out there ! You will save battery life on your hunt .
As you said, it’s great for basic perimeter scanning and security, or for supplementing a more expensive setup. I use my TK to get me out in the darkness to where I’m goin with my rifle and ATN.
Thanks John. I think it's important especially for the TK because you lose some quality from the eye to the on board video. It does look better to the eye.
Hey guys! Thanks for doing this video! I am actually a fan of the FLIR Scout TK and the Seek Thermal handheld models. They get cool tech in the hands of outdoor enthusiasts on a low budget. Thanks for posting!
You're welcome! I like the looks of the Seek Reveal Pro line-up of handhelds and thought of getting it instead of the TK. The way you hold it and look at the display seemed it wouldn't be good for scanning. Holding a device like a Scout to your eye is more natural so when you spot something and take it away you're looking in the right direction already versus looking up. The TK definitely serves the purpose for people who don't want to break the bank. Good move for FLIR because there'll be enough buyers who'll really dig it and go down the rabbit hole. Their next purchase probably being a better Scout unless they want to shoot and FLIR now has the PTS233 that's cheaper than the old RS24 & 32.
Thanks for the info. I have a couple of p8079hp night vision tubes which I have put together on a budget. I am forever trying to improve the setups and enjoy scanning the sky at night. It is great to see videos of the thermal scopes ,very interesting. Have you ever seen anyone take the diy, build it yourself approach with perhaps a bigger sensor. Size it not so much of a problem as it will be tripod mounted.Thanks again for the video.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION Yeh me too ,I have only seen builds with small sensors etc. Will have to keep looking and see what can be done.The sensor size makes a huge difference when it comes to the low light cameras I would think it would be the same with the thermal.
This was an excellent INTRO vid. Not TOO in-depth, hits the highlights AND demonstrates the FLIR TK. Well done. Most get bogged down in TRYING to get too specific..not this one. Good job...
I think the size is and the robustness are the main plus points. For binoculars, a old rule is that the best one in your collection, is the one that you have at hand most. Also not having to worry where I point the device sounds good.
Yes the size is great and the housing is durable. It doesn't feel fragile like you'd need to protect it while hiking, etc. I'd definitely recommend to someone who's planning a big group hike or climb. If you come up short doing regular head counts, you can use this to help locate someone lost or injured.
There aren’t many cons for what it is. I’m very pleased with mine. Detects vehicles easily outside at 1/2 mile distance on the white hot or black hot pallet. Those are best for general surveillance outside.
Love this video - very well presented! Do you think this would be suitable for spotting rats, out to 30 yards? It'll be colder evenings so there's going to be a decent heat differential.
Woweewowwow.. Seeing my dog at night as far away as 30’! That’s almost being able to see as far as from 1/2 court to my dog standing. at he free throw line; Not quite the distance between the pitchers mound to home plate if that’s how far away my dog was. What a game changer, a subversion of every day paradigms. What’s that worth again?
It is $599 which is overpriced for the performance IMO. However, it's catered to the type of person who doesn't own any NV or thermal and doesn't want to spend more money for better performance. It seems many of those types of users are satisfied with the cost & performance.
Please tell me it sucks for deer/turkey hunts so I don't have to explain another hunting purchase to my wife! Especially that you can't find turkeys roosting in Cypress trees.
The Scout III 320 is better than the TK but honestly it's not that much better. Then there's the batteries. The Scouts use an internal rechargeable which sucks if the battery drains in the field such as in the cold and if it has a problem you're SOL. I contacted FLIR a ways back and they said they don't replace batteries in the Scout legacy models. The FLIR Breach will have a better image, uses CR123 batteries, and you can also power it off of a remote rechargeable battery like an Anker. You can also get an extended battery cap from Mod Armory that will let you use 16650 rechargeable batteries. The extended battery cap and 16650 battery is the way to go.
I have few questions, is this the 640x480 ? I think there is a few tk models im not sure, im bidding on one one ebay now, and i dont want a lower res old one. What would you suggest with 500 bucks? I really like the sionyx aroura nv camera but its 800. So im either looking at a flir one, or seek xr. I want decent distance and range, and res. Depends on the cell attached ones, if they are decent i would get one. Im thinking that 800 cam though for decent wildlife at night shots. Thanks
The 640x480 you'll see in the specs for the TK is for the display screen NOT the sensor. The sensor is a tiny 160x120. There are a few different Scout models but only one Scout TK and they only come with the 160x120 sensor. A used Scout III 640 would be over $1k (probably closer to $2k). To be honest with you, for $500 you won't find any decent thermals. Shopping the used market you'll need to spend in the $1k - $3k range. Go on the AR15.com equipment exchange night vision sub forum. There's a guy selling used thermals for good prices including a FLIR Scout III 240. If you're not registered, sign up, so you can contact. He's a good dude and they're worth a look prices are reasonable.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION thank you, yeah i read the specs and feel dumb now, but i would definitely buy a used 240 111, for a reasonable price(600-900). You mention that they made new models and that older ones will be entering used market. I was afraid you was going to tell me that, lol. But i will spend more to get the better low end scale. I appreciate the response and will do exactly as you said, and will let you know what i find out. Thanks again!
No worries! The new Scout Scions are going to be way over $500 around $2,500 - $3,500. The Scout III 240 I mentioned is here: www.ar15.com/forums/Equipment-Exchange/FLIR-Scout-Blowout/172-1872596/ It's way better than the TK.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION well its been 2 days and ive tried every email i could get into, even a secure pay one. They have a wall up for spam and free emails, so i could never register to buy that flir, i did see it, and it was 940 if im correct? So this one us levels above tk chip. I wish i could look at them, but i have to go by what others like yourself know about these things, its an endless circle of tech that im not familiar with. Both therms and nvgs. How do you suggest i become a member? Is there a certain email one uses to go through? Thanks again for all your help!
gmail should work fine. I forgot to ask if you're in the USA? That would be an issue as I believe the Scout III's are ITAR restricted meaning no export outside the USA.
Good walkthrue, thx ..it did look decent on the viewfinder. but the low res and particularly the low framerate is really taking its toe. Will be a chubby mess under 9hz and on a binocular that ain't ideal. also took a plunge on a thermal unit back in the first half of 2017 at 290USD new from the states in a fast frame version. and been pleasantly surprised with the world of thermal and looking to take the next step to VGA res but it aint cheap to go from 320x240 like my present unit to VGA. here on 320x240 th-cam.com/video/2rNIJhWiRtM/w-d-xo.html and on some distance th-cam.com/video/WdaVfF9BJbM/w-d-xo.html
Yes it is. I recently picked up one. It's much better than the TK. You can run it with an extended battery cap from Mod Armory so it can take 16650 rechargeable batteries for 3+ hours of run time or you can use a remote Anker battery versus the TK is internal battery. You can also helmet mount the Breach. It has more range when it comes to detecting and identifying than the TK and a faster refresh rate. It's also super tiny and easy to carry in a jacket pocket. The Breach gets pooped on by some but the image is good and the outdoor alert mode is outstanding. You can adjust the settings to make it perform the best for the conditions you're in.
Question... I've been looking for a NVG/Thermal solution to use when I walk to the stand/blind before dawn so I dont spook deer. Would this be a good solution for what I'm needing? Ive read a lot of mixed reviews but I dont see why this couldn't be used just for walking into the woods to be more aware of what's around me when its pitch black and not use a flashlight. Thanks.
It'll do the job for spotting large animals within 100 yards. Closer in (under 75) you should be able to identify them but further out towards 100 you may only be able to detect a shape to tell that something's there. Some of that will depend on the environment and conditions. A lot of rock in the background could mask heat signatures during warmer months. In humid conditions and especially with rain, the lower res sensor will probably be close to useless. Even higher end thermals can struggle in high humidity. Personally, I'd look for a used one. Or buy it from somewhere with a good return policy so you can take it to your stands and see how it works before deciding to keep it or not. The size is really great for what you're looking to do. It's worth a shot considering it's a lot cheaper than the next best options. Those would be the discontinued Pulsar HD19A (or similar Pulsars) and the FLIR Breach. Those Pulsars pop up on eBay and on the AR-15 forum equipment exchange from time to time. The run times aren't great on batteries but the Breach you can plug in an Anker remote battery that'll last days using it intermittently and keep 123's as backups. Another thing to watch, FLIR is releasing a new Scout line, and possibly people who have the old ones may sell them to upgrade. They use an internal battery but the Scout III's are pretty decent, especially the 640 model. These older Scouts, the III is the best one - faster with less lag. Good luck!
I forgot to add, definitely go thermal. Night vision should only be used when it's totally dark. During twilight/dawn, there can be too much light which is harmful for the image tube. Also, animals blend in very well sometimes even harder to spot with night vision unless you use an infrared illuminator so you can get eye shine. Thermal is much better for finding animals.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION THANK YOU, ive been trying to figure this out for hours now!. something else to note is that the ocean scout is 4.0"x 1.5" x 1.5" while the green scout is 6.0" × 2" × 2". the green scout also has a drop test rating of 2m, the ocean one has no rating. (also i've found that the ocean models are cheaper for some reason)
@@LunasLostLove I'm surprised they'd have two different sized housings. I wonder if it's a typo? The sensor and refresh rate are listed as the same, so if the Ocean is cheaper then that's a good way to go if you're going to buy a TK.
This time of year (at least in n. hemi finally cooling off) if it's moving not pretending to be invisible probably 50-75 yards. Max 100 yards if it's a big jack and everything's perfect.
If you find one for a good price it's worth a shot. If it doesn't work you can keep it to hang on your neck or sell it for at least what you bought it for. Using the TK on your other eye with your Gen 2 will probably suck ass because the TK's lag will mess with your other eye.
Agreed, at the right price it's better than anything else in that price range. Next closest would be an older used Scout III 240/320 or older Pulsar handheld around $800-$1,500k
Depends on the surroundings if you're looking through brush, structures, open fields, etc. 20 is do-able. 40 is probably a stretch but you should be able to see it as a hot spot. The issue is the resolution so at distance you might just see them as hot spot pixels without a lot of definition to shape.
Yes, I could see it being useful to a patrol officer. The Breach, Scout III 640, or the new Scion OTM's would be better but they're also considerably more. The TK is better than nothing. It's small and packable. The range is pretty limited but it will detect a person up to 100 yards depending on the environment. The closer the better it works, so would be very useful in a garage, attic, basement, small alley, etc. It should also be able to see a handgun size object in grass within 25 yards, maybe a little more. Keep in mind that thermal can't see through glass, so scanning while inside a vehicle is limited to side windows rolled down, and you can't look through glass windows into structures/vehicles. Its rechargeable battery let's it stay charged inside the cruiser (with an inverter) versus something with batteries that might have to be changed out during the shift and having to carry batteries on-body in case it goes down during use away from the vehicle. The battery lasts a long time. It should make it through a shift since it wouldn't be constantly on.
You're right. I watched the video again and I said buck in the vid but typed in elk in the caption. Not sure why I did that. Probably because I see more elk than deer in that area. Thanks for pointing that out.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION lol, no worries, great video and thanks for the info. Im trying to buy entry level night optics to see elk so I can get on them and wait for leagal shooting light.
Got it. I'd recommend a handheld thermal. Something with good resolution and a base magnification of 2x or higher. A handheld since it can't be weapon mounted can't be misconstrued that you used it to take down game. It does help to locate downed game and verify their down and not a threat. Depends on your budget in terms of what to get. The Pulsar Helion line is probably the best bang for the buck performance wise. FLIR has the Scout III but the base mag is low and has an internal battery which sucks when it does on you in the field.
Ideal in conjunction with a rifle with night vision capabilities , once you spot a heat signature you can turn the Ir light and night vision scope to see in more detail what is out there ! You will save battery life on your hunt .
As you said, it’s great for basic perimeter scanning and security, or for supplementing a more expensive setup. I use my TK to get me out in the darkness to where I’m goin with my rifle and ATN.
The TK's size is perfect for that. As you know the less weight to carry the better!
The only channel actually showing a POV view
Thanks John. I think it's important especially for the TK because you lose some quality from the eye to the on board video. It does look better to the eye.
Hey guys! Thanks for doing this video! I am actually a fan of the FLIR Scout TK and the Seek Thermal handheld models. They get cool tech in the hands of outdoor enthusiasts on a low budget. Thanks for posting!
You're welcome! I like the looks of the Seek Reveal Pro line-up of handhelds and thought of getting it instead of the TK. The way you hold it and look at the display seemed it wouldn't be good for scanning. Holding a device like a Scout to your eye is more natural so when you spot something and take it away you're looking in the right direction already versus looking up.
The TK definitely serves the purpose for people who don't want to break the bank. Good move for FLIR because there'll be enough buyers who'll really dig it and go down the rabbit hole. Their next purchase probably being a better Scout unless they want to shoot and FLIR now has the PTS233 that's cheaper than the old RS24 & 32.
NITEWALKER - I’ve got the TK Scout also. It’s pretty sweet but right off the bat I wanted a level or two up but those prices...$$
Thanks for the info. I have a couple of p8079hp night vision tubes which I have put together on a budget. I am forever trying to improve the setups and enjoy scanning the sky at night. It is great to see videos of the thermal scopes ,very interesting. Have you ever seen anyone take the diy, build it yourself approach with perhaps a bigger sensor. Size it not so much of a problem as it will be tripod mounted.Thanks again for the video.
I haven't. I'd love to see something like that
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION Yeh me too ,I have only seen builds with small sensors etc. Will have to keep looking and see what can be done.The sensor size makes a huge difference when it comes to the low light cameras I would think it would be the same with the thermal.
Man, this is a great review and your channel ROCKS!
Thank you!
This was an excellent INTRO vid. Not TOO in-depth, hits the highlights AND demonstrates the FLIR TK. Well done. Most get bogged down in TRYING to get too specific..not this one. Good job...
I think the size is and the robustness are the main plus points. For binoculars, a old rule is that the best one in your collection, is the one that you have at hand most. Also not having to worry where I point the device sounds good.
Yes the size is great and the housing is durable. It doesn't feel fragile like you'd need to protect it while hiking, etc. I'd definitely recommend to someone who's planning a big group hike or climb. If you come up short doing regular head counts, you can use this to help locate someone lost or injured.
Thanks, just what I needed to hear. Good review. Fair on pro and cons review.
Thank you! Sincerely appreciate the feedback.
There aren’t many cons for what it is. I’m very pleased with mine. Detects vehicles easily outside at 1/2 mile distance on the white hot or black hot pallet. Those are best for general surveillance outside.
Appreciate this video. Looks like a nice and affordable tool to supplement my NV equipment.
Well done. I think I’d like one.
Love this video - very well presented!
Do you think this would be suitable for spotting rats, out to 30 yards? It'll be colder evenings so there's going to be a decent heat differential.
Thank you! It'll detect rats 30 yards and under. The resolution isn't the greatest due to the core size so it'll work best in more open areas.
The Scout 3 640 is pretty awesome. It’s what people who have never used a thermal expect thermal to be like.
Totally agree
A 640 is light years better
Speed demon - get a 640. Won’t regret it. Take the $500 for this and make a down payment for at least one level up. You be thankful you did.
very helpful video.thank you
Woweewowwow..
Seeing my dog at night as far away as 30’!
That’s almost being able to see as far as from 1/2 court to my dog standing. at he free throw line;
Not quite the distance between the pitchers mound to home plate if that’s how far away my dog was.
What a game changer, a subversion of every day paradigms.
What’s that worth again?
It is $599 which is overpriced for the performance IMO. However, it's catered to the type of person who doesn't own any NV or thermal and doesn't want to spend more money for better performance. It seems many of those types of users are satisfied with the cost & performance.
Would this model be able to detect a missing cat who might be hiding in the back yard (in shrubs, under a deck or in a shed)?
It would definitely work for that. A cat sized animal you could probably detect within 30 yards pretty easily.
Thanks for this! Awesome review.
You're welcome and thanks!
Thank you for the effective review.
Thank you!
100 yards is the max range listed on the website :) you were right
thanks for the video
You're welcome!
Just had my Scout TK outside. It’s clear, 57 degrees. Detecting deer and ppl at 1/4 mile. Detecting vehicles on the road at 1/2 mile pretty well.
Most definitely thermal works so much better when it's cooler.
In the winter and fall ay night I can see warm stuff 1/2 mile, in summer its around 100 yards
Interesting review 👍
Thanks for this video
Please tell me it sucks for deer/turkey hunts so I don't have to explain another hunting purchase to my wife! Especially that you can't find turkeys roosting in Cypress trees.
Lol
Can you check the temperature or not? Let me know please ! Thank u so much !
No, it does not read temp
Good evening, is it worth the difference in money between flir scout tk and flir scout ll 320 or flir scout lll 320?
The Scout III 320 is better than the TK but honestly it's not that much better. Then there's the batteries. The Scouts use an internal rechargeable which sucks if the battery drains in the field such as in the cold and if it has a problem you're SOL. I contacted FLIR a ways back and they said they don't replace batteries in the Scout legacy models.
The FLIR Breach will have a better image, uses CR123 batteries, and you can also power it off of a remote rechargeable battery like an Anker. You can also get an extended battery cap from Mod Armory that will let you use 16650 rechargeable batteries. The extended battery cap and 16650 battery is the way to go.
I have few questions, is this the 640x480 ? I think there is a few tk models im not sure, im bidding on one one ebay now, and i dont want a lower res old one. What would you suggest with 500 bucks? I really like the sionyx aroura nv camera but its 800. So im either looking at a flir one, or seek xr. I want decent distance and range, and res. Depends on the cell attached ones, if they are decent i would get one. Im thinking that 800 cam though for decent wildlife at night shots. Thanks
The 640x480 you'll see in the specs for the TK is for the display screen NOT the sensor. The sensor is a tiny 160x120. There are a few different Scout models but only one Scout TK and they only come with the 160x120 sensor. A used Scout III 640 would be over $1k (probably closer to $2k).
To be honest with you, for $500 you won't find any decent thermals. Shopping the used market you'll need to spend in the $1k - $3k range. Go on the AR15.com equipment exchange night vision sub forum. There's a guy selling used thermals for good prices including a FLIR Scout III 240. If you're not registered, sign up, so you can contact. He's a good dude and they're worth a look prices are reasonable.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION thank you, yeah i read the specs and feel dumb now, but i would definitely buy a used 240 111, for a reasonable price(600-900). You mention that they made new models and that older ones will be entering used market. I was afraid you was going to tell me that, lol. But i will spend more to get the better low end scale. I appreciate the response and will do exactly as you said, and will let you know what i find out. Thanks again!
No worries! The new Scout Scions are going to be way over $500 around $2,500 - $3,500. The Scout III 240 I mentioned is here: www.ar15.com/forums/Equipment-Exchange/FLIR-Scout-Blowout/172-1872596/
It's way better than the TK.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION well its been 2 days and ive tried every email i could get into, even a secure pay one. They have a wall up for spam and free emails, so i could never register to buy that flir, i did see it, and it was 940 if im correct? So this one us levels above tk chip. I wish i could look at them, but i have to go by what others like yourself know about these things, its an endless circle of tech that im not familiar with. Both therms and nvgs. How do you suggest i become a member? Is there a certain email one uses to go through? Thanks again for all your help!
gmail should work fine. I forgot to ask if you're in the USA? That would be an issue as I believe the Scout III's are ITAR restricted meaning no export outside the USA.
Good walkthrue, thx ..it did look decent on the viewfinder.
but the low res and particularly the low framerate is really taking its toe.
Will be a chubby mess under 9hz and on a binocular that ain't ideal.
also took a plunge on a thermal unit back in the first half of 2017 at 290USD new from the states in a fast frame version.
and been pleasantly surprised with the world of thermal and looking to take the next step to VGA res but it aint cheap to go from 320x240 like my present unit to VGA.
here on 320x240 th-cam.com/video/2rNIJhWiRtM/w-d-xo.html
and on some distance
th-cam.com/video/WdaVfF9BJbM/w-d-xo.html
thanks for sharing your You Tube links - subscribed!
I guess since they are stopping Civilian sales better get one while you can. Anyone else make a good thermal unit ?
For now it looks like they'll keep making the handheld thermals, just now more civilian weapon sights.
if i was in a tent how would it go at seeing things outside of it?
Looking through a mesh screen will work (or at least I've been able to with no problems) but any solid barrier will not see through it.
Could you use this to spot racoons, opossums and squirrels in trees at night?
Definitely would do the job under 50 yards.
I have. Works great too.
Is the Flir breach any good?
Yes it is. I recently picked up one. It's much better than the TK. You can run it with an extended battery cap from Mod Armory so it can take 16650 rechargeable batteries for 3+ hours of run time or you can use a remote Anker battery versus the TK is internal battery. You can also helmet mount the Breach. It has more range when it comes to detecting and identifying than the TK and a faster refresh rate. It's also super tiny and easy to carry in a jacket pocket. The Breach gets pooped on by some but the image is good and the outdoor alert mode is outstanding. You can adjust the settings to make it perform the best for the conditions you're in.
Question...
I've been looking for a NVG/Thermal solution to use when I walk to the stand/blind before dawn so I dont spook deer.
Would this be a good solution for what I'm needing? Ive read a lot of mixed reviews but I dont see why this couldn't be used just for walking into the woods to be more aware of what's around me when its pitch black and not use a flashlight.
Thanks.
It'll do the job for spotting large animals within 100 yards. Closer in (under 75) you should be able to identify them but further out towards 100 you may only be able to detect a shape to tell that something's there. Some of that will depend on the environment and conditions. A lot of rock in the background could mask heat signatures during warmer months. In humid conditions and especially with rain, the lower res sensor will probably be close to useless. Even higher end thermals can struggle in high humidity. Personally, I'd look for a used one. Or buy it from somewhere with a good return policy so you can take it to your stands and see how it works before deciding to keep it or not. The size is really great for what you're looking to do. It's worth a shot considering it's a lot cheaper than the next best options. Those would be the discontinued Pulsar HD19A (or similar Pulsars) and the FLIR Breach. Those Pulsars pop up on eBay and on the AR-15 forum equipment exchange from time to time. The run times aren't great on batteries but the Breach you can plug in an Anker remote battery that'll last days using it intermittently and keep 123's as backups. Another thing to watch, FLIR is releasing a new Scout line, and possibly people who have the old ones may sell them to upgrade. They use an internal battery but the Scout III's are pretty decent, especially the 640 model. These older Scouts, the III is the best one - faster with less lag.
Good luck!
I forgot to add, definitely go thermal. Night vision should only be used when it's totally dark. During twilight/dawn, there can be too much light which is harmful for the image tube. Also, animals blend in very well sometimes even harder to spot with night vision unless you use an infrared illuminator so you can get eye shine. Thermal is much better for finding animals.
You are the man!
How well would this work for tracking a deer and what range would it detect it from
It's rated at 100 yards which is possible for deer in the right conditions/terrain but IMO it's better suited to about 50 yards.
What kind of gloves you have ?
Those are Mechanix Fast Fit in coyote. I like them because the fingers work with touchscreens.
where did u buy it
Is this good for seeing smal animals(rats) at 25yards?
The terrain and environmental conditions play a large role but you should be able to detect them at that distance.
What's the difference between yours and the marine model?
Pretty sure it's exactly the same but it's rated to be submersible IP67.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION THANK YOU, ive been trying to figure this out for hours now!. something else to note is that the ocean scout is 4.0"x 1.5" x 1.5" while the green scout is 6.0" × 2" × 2". the green scout also has a drop test rating of 2m, the ocean one has no rating. (also i've found that the ocean models are cheaper for some reason)
@@LunasLostLove I'm surprised they'd have two different sized housings. I wonder if it's a typo? The sensor and refresh rate are listed as the same, so if the Ocean is cheaper then that's a good way to go if you're going to buy a TK.
What kind of distance would you be able to see and make out rabbits with at night
This time of year (at least in n. hemi finally cooling off) if it's moving not pretending to be invisible probably 50-75 yards. Max 100 yards if it's a big jack and everything's perfect.
If you find one for a good price it's worth a shot. If it doesn't work you can keep it to hang on your neck or sell it for at least what you bought it for. Using the TK on your other eye with your Gen 2 will probably suck ass because the TK's lag will mess with your other eye.
I got mine from a pawn shop for 200$
That's a good score
Where can i find one for less than 500
Got mine on sale from scheels for 499 but had a gift card too. If you find it 499 or below just get it. I’m not disappointed.
Agreed, at the right price it's better than anything else in that price range. Next closest would be an older used Scout III 240/320 or older Pulsar handheld around $800-$1,500k
@@shable1436 ebays got some right now
Was this all filmed in daylight?
Just the through the lens video where I held the camera behind it. The rest was at night.
Would this be able to spot rats at short range 20-40 yards 👍
Depends on the surroundings if you're looking through brush, structures, open fields, etc. 20 is do-able. 40 is probably a stretch but you should be able to see it as a hot spot. The issue is the resolution so at distance you might just see them as hot spot pixels without a lot of definition to shape.
NITEWALKER - would have to be a pretty big rat at forty yards.
What's a night vision enthusiast? Someone who is enthusiastic about night vision?
Do you think this could benefit law enforcement?
Yes, I could see it being useful to a patrol officer. The Breach, Scout III 640, or the new Scion OTM's would be better but they're also considerably more. The TK is better than nothing. It's small and packable. The range is pretty limited but it will detect a person up to 100 yards depending on the environment. The closer the better it works, so would be very useful in a garage, attic, basement, small alley, etc. It should also be able to see a handgun size object in grass within 25 yards, maybe a little more.
Keep in mind that thermal can't see through glass, so scanning while inside a vehicle is limited to side windows rolled down, and you can't look through glass windows into structures/vehicles. Its rechargeable battery let's it stay charged inside the cruiser (with an inverter) versus something with batteries that might have to be changed out during the shift and having to carry batteries on-body in case it goes down during use away from the vehicle. The battery lasts a long time. It should make it through a shift since it wouldn't be constantly on.
You know
Doesn't this device record video?
Yes. At about 5:33 in the video shows the on-board video.
Leupold lto tracker is comparable to this
Good to know. Haven't looked through one yet. Thanks for sharing
LTO - bigger sensor, higher refresh rate, bit smaller, much nicer.
@@janwinnicki3679 no camera function on the lto and they have no internal battery. some might see those as positives though lol.
why to ebay sell it 600 $ and yu say you bought it for 400$ can you tell me the shop?
I just kept an eye out and when I saw one for a lower than normal price I made an offer and it was accepted. No shop.
As I posted,I found mine in a pawn shop for 200$, ya gotta do your legwork.
That was a deer not an elk.
You're right. I watched the video again and I said buck in the vid but typed in elk in the caption. Not sure why I did that. Probably because I see more elk than deer in that area. Thanks for pointing that out.
@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION lol, no worries, great video and thanks for the info. Im trying to buy entry level night optics to see elk so I can get on them and wait for leagal shooting light.
Got it. I'd recommend a handheld thermal. Something with good resolution and a base magnification of 2x or higher. A handheld since it can't be weapon mounted can't be misconstrued that you used it to take down game. It does help to locate downed game and verify their down and not a threat. Depends on your budget in terms of what to get. The Pulsar Helion line is probably the best bang for the buck performance wise. FLIR has the Scout III but the base mag is low and has an internal battery which sucks when it does on you in the field.
That makes sense. I will check into those. Thank you for the advice!
You're welcome! Ultimate Night Vision does rentals too and I believe the Helion is available to rent. Good luck!