I enjoyed the video, but I'd love it if you enabled automatic subtitles for your videos (simple setting) so that I can understand more than just a few handful of English loan words.
The cheaper EV did as I expected as they are basically based on 3 wheeler tuk tuks. The wuling EV did as a car would with proper crumple zone and stuff. With some airbags and a higher top speed I can see this being used in slower high ways and maybe give more competition to the kei markets if all under 7500 usd
*yes the red one (also known as a chang-li) is unsafe but remember they are only meant to be in the Provence’s, towns, and cities and small areas that don’t have public roads because this type of EV isn’t designed to go fast and be designed for an impact* *also forgot to add that these are also just for getting some groceries near by or elders or just wanting to go somewhere that isn’t so far away*
it will not. The MiniEV caused injuries even hitting a shitbox EV golf-cart type crap. The show said if it hits a regular car or SUV the damage will be exponential. In the US the car is a death trap.
@@RandomUserX99 the US is a death trap anyway. These idiotic big cars and missing ways for cycling (and thus fat people) speak for themselves. Combined with a poor health system.
I have been looking for crash test videos of the inexpensive electric cars. Finally here's one, but unfortunately for me, not in english. But the video says it all. The "Wuling" did much better than the red car, which appears to be a DEATHTRAP!! I wouldn't want to be in the white car either, but it's stronger than the red for sure. Great offset crash test. Thank you for this.👍
That red one can't be called as a car, because in China it belongs to "low-speed electric vehicle" category, which means you can't get a legal licence and number plate, so it is not a vehicle which we called car. The show is meant to find the safety difference between legal cars and these craps.
Regardless. If it's got four wheels and moves under it's own power, it's a car. The red one is a DEATHTRAP. And if it's on the road, it's vulnerable to collision, and the people inside would be doomed! The other one did better, but it too is a danger to life and limb. I'll take and old Buick any day over these crates!!
@@nicksgarage8295 Just look at the crash test. Would you want to be in either one of those things?! As a "car", it a deathtrap. I'm been in a couple of REAL cars that were TOTALLED and I survived. (Neither wreck my fault.) But if I were in one of those cars in the same kind of wreck, I would be DEAD. No thanks on these things.
The show mentioned the Wuling used medium-high strength steel rated from 210mPa up to 270mPa for the chassis, on par with compact cars' body strength. However, minimum weight plus minimum crumple zone spell it's a death trap, shouldn't drive it on the highway at all.
To people saying the Wuling "fared well", they crashed it against the smallest vehicle possible, and the driver still took signifigant damage. Any larger vehicle than a red "neighbourhood runabout" (such as a delivery truck) would kill the driver. It did not fare well, it fared extremely poorly.
it would be okay in slow speed city areas or rural areas for highways, normal roads, not sure how else they could make it more safe besides adding airbags whatever material you stick onto a mini like this, it is not going to fare well in a crash. There isn't even an engine to act as a crumple zone
Great video / crash test. The Wuling EV is of course just a non-licenced vehicle to drive around locally like a bicycle, not on the highway. The MiniEV looks great. With some airbags could sell it in western countries.
Absolutely not to think about buy any poor quality and unsafe like this super cheap cars. Wuling mini EV is better, safety and strong good car. It's float over water and it's run, no problem.
Que pena que esse mini não temos se quer importar pro Brasil! Após ver esse seu teste vejo que para ele ficar melhor só falta colocar air-bag.. dai o resto é apenas pequenos ajustes para deixar a caixa do motorista mais segura!
Hello, the brand mini belongs to Wuling Motors in China, which is a very good traditional Chinese car company. The seat belts you mentioned are already standard in subsequent mini models. The positioning of this car in China is to buy groceries, commute for short distances in the city, and pick up and drop off children.
@@elpibegamer6730 The red car is an electric vehicle that is on the edge of the law in China. It is never allowed to drive on Chinese urban roads and major roads. However, because China is relatively large, there is still a certain market in some remote or backward rural areas.
No. This would need to be re-engineered to be safe enough to be used on the roads. How the manufacturers got away with producing such a poorly engineered vehicle is amazing. Even when used in site appropriate locations, this doesn't mean that normal heavier cars won't also be using the same locations.
Все-таки надо было их каждую по отдельности разбить по стандарту автомобильному, чтоб понять, что к чему. А так-то оно и так было понятно, что красной будет плохо.
Itu kali kenapa kyk keras gitu body wuling.. Pintu terasa berat saat di buka tutup.. Trnyata besinya padat.. Trbukti dari video ini yg di lawan bukan merek kaleng2 lagi, itu kan logo mobil mercy mobil mahal di indonesia, cuma kala di grand doang si ini wuling jd ejekan dari fans2 merek sebelah selalu memakai senjata ini
The Wuling seems to have done very well in this crash test. I, of course, did not understand one single word so I am not clear on the red 'Mercedes'. Looking into the engine compartment I saw nothing. Is this also an EV or does it have motor/ engine in the back ? If it is a traffic ready vehicle I will leave my fingers off it. Not safe.
@@yao4738 thank you very much for the explanation. I was in fact wondering about the red vehicle. In the price range the Wuling seems to fare better. I appreciate your effort. Thank you.
You won’t know and definitely don’t want to know how annoying those red little cars are in the city.The drivers even doesn’t need a driving license to drive this shxt.
The red "car" is actually not legal. It looks like a car but doesn't have any safety design, and was sold in the name of electric scooters. This video tries to convince people not to buy them.
no airbag? still a fail. but my compliments for the makers ogf this video even If I can't understand chinese they made everything clear with just the pictures and the work they did to dismount everything from the unibody of the car
If government cared about a real renewable energy transformation they would adjust regulation to allow them in our cities quickly, but they don't so we won't. The Wuling would be my next car otherwise. It still has a lot of room for improvement but for under 10 grand so long as its safe, has aircon and the stated over 150km range it works for me more than the new feature rich over priced hot garbage a lot of cars are.
Mercy Vs Wuling woooow wuling is the best, gila memang ini wuling body mmg keras bukan cuma di versi Almaz, conferro, cortez doang.. Sampai di mobil listrik mini jg kuat, lawanya bukan merek kaleng2 bos Mercy gitu, merek mobil mahal di indonesia
TBH Wuling crash test only looked better because it was crashing a cheaply built EV car, that Cheap car is absorbing most of the impact for both of the cars. This doesn't really proved that Wuling is safe, safer than cheaply made decorated golf cart? Yes. Safe on the road against any other cars? High likely no
@@bunnyfreakz you're going to sustain some sort of injury in a crash but some cars will do a better job of making a crash survivable vs fatal. A Wuling against an Ford F-150 will probably look like the red EV or worse.
Tbh I'm not from China but I do have Wuling car in my country, and almost everyone here know that Wuling body is heavier and thicker than Japanese / Korean cars with similar or even higher (but not too far) price
I enjoyed the video, but I'd love it if you enabled automatic subtitles for your videos (simple setting) so that I can understand more than just a few handful of English loan words.
I really enjoy watching these, thanks for uploading!
The front suspension remaining during/after impact helps to absorb divert impact damage thus taking it away from occupants... :):)
hey
The cheaper EV did as I expected as they are basically based on 3 wheeler tuk tuks. The wuling EV did as a car would with proper crumple zone and stuff. With some airbags and a higher top speed I can see this being used in slower high ways and maybe give more competition to the kei markets if all under 7500 usd
with higher speed it could be used on regular roads.. why highways?
@@Boz1211111 No way in highways... probably illegal. Best a mini EV can do is treat it like a motorcycle... a slightly more protected motor
5000 USD
Can't be sold in the us because the wuling ev does not have airbags.
@@lostlost1549 but the Freze Nikrob has Airbags
很用心的節目， 讚！
The Wuling EV will be great for quick errands but it'll be scary to drive on highways.
我ev上下班，全程都是市区的红绿灯路，车速能上50我都很开心了。
說老頭樂不安全？
但總比摩托車安全吧
摩托車肉包鐵的
摩托車更危險
而且至少還能遮風避雨
如果不安全的駕駛觀念
就算你開雙B一樣也會出事
不過
話又說回來
如果老頭樂改用摩托車引擎100-150cc
不然用gogoro 雙電池系統也可以
塑料殼改成鋁皮板金
再加強一下車體結構
在台灣賣8-13萬
應該會大賣
至少我會買來代步
上下班 買菜 買便當用車
我是認真的
呵呵
摩托車安全多了
飛出去是摔
有機會半死不活
老頭樂撞擊
駕駛跟乘客會直接被鐵皮碾成肉醬
Thanks for such review ! (from Europa, Latvia)
I like the visuals and the measurements of how it changed from before the crash. Very cool.
thank you for uploading
分析得太好了
*yes the red one (also known as a chang-li) is unsafe but remember they are only meant to be in the Provence’s, towns, and cities and small areas that don’t have public roads because this type of EV isn’t designed to go fast and be designed for an impact*
*also forgot to add that these are also just for getting some groceries near by or elders or just wanting to go somewhere that isn’t so far away*
制作精良的视频，内容，剪辑，一级棒
hey
Looks good in test. I hope it will also protect you from all kinds of impact. Please put some english sub.
it will not. The MiniEV caused injuries even hitting a shitbox EV golf-cart type crap. The show said if it hits a regular car or SUV the damage will be exponential. In the US the car is a death trap.
@@RandomUserX99 the US is a death trap anyway. These idiotic big cars and missing ways for cycling (and thus fat people) speak for themselves. Combined with a poor health system.
這兩者沒有可比性，MINNIEV 是正規的可以上牌上路的汽車，另一輛是作坊攢出來的東西，比自行車 兩輪電動車代步 載物能力 強，遠達不到上牌標準，但市場有對這類車的巨大需求存在。
Yes better have be 2 same cars crash.
台灣危險品的2輪125都要賣10萬台幣了，
那台紅色的小G才rmb2w,價格算很佛心了！
@@lindalin4353 你不如穿全套賽車服+品牌全罩頭盔,撞飛出去的生存性都比這東西高.....
Ótimo Review, obrigado por subir este conteúdo. Uma pena não ter legenda ou dublagem por IA.
I have been looking for crash test videos of the inexpensive electric cars. Finally here's one, but unfortunately for me, not in english. But the video says it all. The "Wuling" did much better than the red car, which appears to be a DEATHTRAP!! I wouldn't want to be in the white car either, but it's stronger than the red for sure.
Great offset crash test. Thank you for this.👍
That red one can't be called as a car, because in China it belongs to "low-speed electric vehicle" category, which means you can't get a legal licence and number plate, so it is not a vehicle which we called car. The show is meant to find the safety difference between legal cars and these craps.
Regardless. If it's got four wheels and moves under it's own power, it's a car.
The red one is a DEATHTRAP. And if it's on the road, it's vulnerable to collision, and the people inside would be doomed!
The other one did better, but it too is a danger to life and limb. I'll take and old Buick any day over these crates!!
@@justincase2281 hows it a death trap. it would far much better than a car vs pedestrian or car vs bicycle. if anything its added safety.
@@nicksgarage8295 Just look at the crash test. Would you want to be in either one of those things?! As a "car", it a deathtrap. I'm been in a couple of REAL cars that were TOTALLED and I survived. (Neither wreck my fault.) But if I were in one of those cars in the same kind of wreck, I would be DEAD. No thanks on these things.
The show mentioned the Wuling used medium-high strength steel rated from 210mPa up to 270mPa for the chassis, on par with compact cars' body strength. However, minimum weight plus minimum crumple zone spell it's a death trap, shouldn't drive it on the highway at all.
Thanks
老头乐还是有市场的，在城镇，在广大农村有xx人月收入不足xx元。他们买不起正儿八经的汽车，汽车养护费用对他们来说也太高。老头乐便宜，结构简单，维护方便，深受广大人民喜爱，从销量上就能看出来，人们有这样的需求就会有这样的产品。有人问老头乐安全性这么差会什么还要买？在你买不起车的情况下，老头乐总比两轮摩托车强吧，刮风下雨都没有问题，使用成本也低。在刚刚温饱，买不起房的情况下你还会去关心汽车安全性吗？我们能做的就是制定相关标准提高产品质量。现在来看五菱宏光mini就是针对老头乐生产的高品质产品，同样的钱我也会选择五菱，这也是神车销量好的原因。
五菱车的定价是做了大量调研的，人民的汽车一点不假。
@@bssydr MINI EV 都只是三萬，那台紅車都要兩萬，為什麼不買 MINI EV
@@nobodyno489 因为之前没有现在它来了，被誉为神车是最穷的地方和最富的地方都有使用的场景
其实不是买不起汽车，最主要的是驾驶证问题。不然买个二手汽车也就2万多块钱。不比这个强百倍。
很棒的影片 !
大成本制作视频就是良心！
Thanks for information
Hope to see Wuling on the streets of my country soon!
Same 🇧🇷
Same 🇧🇷
In Brazil??
@@mongoboy2772 yea. But I know not gonna happen. We can't even afford to eat meat 😭
@@liviamartins1805 ohnoo 🥺🥺 sad to hear about you
电池才是车最贵的吧，其他没什么值钱的
Luarbiasa nihh wuling ev 😂
To people saying the Wuling "fared well", they crashed it against the smallest vehicle possible, and the driver still took signifigant damage. Any larger vehicle than a red "neighbourhood runabout" (such as a delivery truck) would kill the driver.
It did not fare well, it fared extremely poorly.
This is not true.
@@lonnieant The evidence is before your eyes. Don't let blind nationalism cloud your judgement.
A similar situation happens with other Chinese car brands (Geely, Baojun, etc) scoring 5/5 crash test in China but 0/5 in EUROCAP EU crash test
it would be okay in slow speed city areas or rural areas
for highways, normal roads, not sure how else they could make it more safe besides adding airbags
whatever material you stick onto a mini like this, it is not going to fare well in a crash. There isn't even an engine to act as a crumple zone
电池都没事，非常好的消息。改进下车架设计即可，就是成本会高点。其实这种小车，主要是市区里走。我早晚送孩子去幼儿园，平均速度20km/h.
和普通汽车比是差很多，但是比电动自行车摩托好多了。
只能算是一個體型大點的電瓶車
由體闊40公分化為150公分的自行單車而已
@@OPENFOREVER11 说的好，下次让高尔夫球车和卡车对撞下😆
@@OPENFOREVER11 哦对，另外那个低速电动车强制限速的，开不到40km/h。
安全性會隨誠實的媒体報導大幅提升！
五菱成本控制真牛，和老头乐一个价格，还能刚刚好过国标。感觉节目组有点黑五菱，最后非加一段期望五菱提高技术有点没意思，五菱又不是没有更贵，更好的小车，五菱不是没技术，而是这个成本之下只能做成这样。
你是不是瞎？
@@zacwayne1181 Forgot your medication today?
就是台不用淋雨的機車唄!!
当有人放弃摩托车而开始购买汽车时，这意味着他们更多地考虑安全。
但是.....不知何故他们只是为了避免下雨开车。
还确实为了阴雨冷天而开车，骑着电驴阴雨天上下班，冷得想哭。
3w的五菱肯定比3w的摩托车安全
还为了不考驾照
五菱宏光表现不错
Great video / crash test. The Wuling EV is of course just a non-licenced vehicle to drive around locally like a bicycle, not on the highway. The MiniEV looks great. With some airbags could sell it in western countries.
消费者不关心安全，否则他们永远不会骑摩托车。 他们永远不会为了提前 5 分钟到达而开得更快。
骑不骑摩托管你什么事？你关心安全你别出门呀，别用刀切菜呀。别喝水呛死呀
最講求安全性的歐洲摩托車也賣得很好，這不關安不安全的事，事關使用者的習慣
应该说某些消费者不在乎安全。否则人人都去骑摩托车
主要是不戴头盔，不遵守交规
@@user-db3pq1pv7t th-cam.com/channels/4j7Cex4_TMo0z6QDNalR1Q.htmlvideos
（如果打不开视频就下载）
Absolutely not to think about buy any poor quality and unsafe like this super cheap cars.
Wuling mini EV is better, safety and strong good car. It's float over water and it's run, no problem.
It's float over water LOL
I think OP meant metaphorically floats over water. Wuling is an _electric vehicle_ right? Water and electricity don't mix well👨🏻🔬
Water tight batteries pack.
Que pena que esse mini não temos se quer importar pro Brasil! Após ver esse seu teste vejo que para ele ficar melhor só falta colocar air-bag.. dai o resto é apenas pequenos ajustes para deixar a caixa do motorista mais segura!
Pana ese auto Moto es ilegal para este tiempo
Hello, the brand mini belongs to Wuling Motors in China, which is a very good traditional Chinese car company. The seat belts you mentioned are already standard in subsequent mini models. The positioning of this car in China is to buy groceries, commute for short distances in the city, and pick up and drop off children.
@@elpibegamer6730 The red car is an electric vehicle that is on the edge of the law in China. It is never allowed to drive on Chinese urban roads and major roads. However, because China is relatively large, there is still a certain market in some remote or backward rural areas.
No. This would need to be re-engineered to be safe enough to be used on the roads. How the manufacturers got away with producing such a poorly engineered vehicle is amazing. Even when used in site appropriate locations, this doesn't mean that normal heavier cars won't also be using the same locations.
mini EV is a great choice for urban, rural, and seaside areas. This car only costs US$4,300 in China.
I'd buy a Wuling MiniEV in Canada in a heart beat!
Balls of steel ! lol
Before watching this video, I love MiniEv, but now, I think it’s not safe when miniEv hits other cars!!!!! So scary 😦
I’ll buy 2
baojun kiwi ev
nice
couldn't understand a word but hey, nice video :D
不過呢個節目製作都好認真，嗰個主持人態度非常踏實，認真
Все-таки надо было их каждую по отдельности разбить по стандарту автомобильному, чтоб понять, что к чему. А так-то оно и так было понятно, что красной будет плохо.
毕竟也要考虑成本价格！EV设计概念是城市上下班，类似于50公里的对冲的情况，还是比较少见的
不要小看女司机的威力。 各种不可能都变可能
難道上下班，就不該安全了！
@@user-ly5uo5mt3d 不是我覺得，國際上有標準的，有能力的政府要代替人民把關啊！
。。对我来讲50公里就是日常时速，但怎么说也比骑两轮的强XD 那两轮的还百公里时速呢KEKW
@@WilliamKu6100 确实
Wuling really did a good work for making even for a small cheap car
看很多up主播老头乐玩耍的视频我都有些动心了，但是看了您的视频浇熄了熊熊的购物欲。我还是老实的打车吧。
做一期两万价位的两辆的摩托车六十公里每小时百分之五十的对撞或者摩托车和汽车的对撞实验吧，如果你钱不够买车实验，我可以资助你，谢谢。
这个都不用撞，汽车赢
那是白痴举例吧？开的摩托车的人自知肉包铁，而开老头乐的人以为是铁包肉，在这种假象下，驾驶者意识不一样，事故风险拉高翻倍，危害的不止司机一人，全车乘客都时刻面临变肉馅的可能。
尤其是一些退休老人贪图穿梭小街接送孙子的便利，现有正规车不开，去买这类老头乐作保姆车，埋下伏笔坑害三代人而不自知！
坐公交接送好过，退休这么闲
@台湾那点事儿 Dsz
其实博主偷换了概念，虽然红光撞击是老头乐，但是撞击实验用的老头乐和五菱宏光没有太大重量差别，并不是市面那种几千块老头乐
准确看这台老头乐基础功能，装配重量都和五菱相差不大，只是小作坊制造而已，五菱能有这表现已经很不错了，明明是野路子电动汽车博主却称之为老头乐
看了红车的结构还敢说和五菱相差不大，这是真敢睁眼说瞎话
@@user-eg1jq9do2u MINI EV 再低端都是大廠出品，低質總有一個限度
@@user-eg1jq9do2u 原贴是在给五菱mini说话。这个碰撞表现不太好 希望能改进设计 让安全性更高些。
五菱这表现不错？换成非老头乐的普通乘用车让它撞看看？一家有几个人够死的？
I'd love to see and hear an English version of this video.
hey
Wuling came out far better for sure.Wouldnt mind one!
Far better but still sh!t. Dont fool yourself.
Wuling car is a basic car, it is suitable in heavy urban traffic or slow free traffic rural areas
五菱沒有氣囊能銷售？
为了你爱的人和家人不要买这种小车，每个人都难以避免车祸
这就是电单车替代品！不能对它高标准看待！农村乡镇需求巨大！
比摩托车肉包铁安全就够了
@@user-zi2su1if4j 不见得 摩托车只要平原存活率都还算有
Edan, kuat emg ini wuling, gue pake confero dua kali disundul avanza dan innova reborn cm lecet doang 😜😂
Itu kali kenapa kyk keras gitu body wuling.. Pintu terasa berat saat di buka tutup.. Trnyata besinya padat.. Trbukti dari video ini yg di lawan bukan merek kaleng2 lagi, itu kan logo mobil mercy mobil mahal di indonesia, cuma kala di grand doang si ini wuling jd ejekan dari fans2 merek sebelah selalu memakai senjata ini
The Wuling seems to have done very well in this crash test. I, of course, did not understand one single word so I am not clear on the red 'Mercedes'. Looking into the engine compartment I saw nothing. Is this also an EV or does it have motor/ engine in the back ? If it is a traffic ready vehicle I will leave my fingers off it. Not safe.
@@yao4738 thank you very much for the explanation. I was in fact wondering about the red vehicle. In the price range the Wuling seems to fare better. I appreciate your effort. Thank you.
推荐 出一个 smart和五菱对撞
especially the red one
What is the speed of the crash?
good video
That red car shouldn’t be allowed to sell having seen its lack of everything. The wiling is still my favourite urban thingy
You won’t know and definitely don’t want to know how annoying those red little cars are in the city.The drivers even doesn’t need a driving license to drive this shxt.
The red "car" is actually not legal. It looks like a car but doesn't have any safety design, and was sold in the name of electric scooters. This video tries to convince people not to buy them.
does it have an airbag?
良心作品，良心制作。
往往交通事故多的反而是奥迪路虎，因为他们觉得安全系数高，上高速直接开到130以上。城市上下班的路上，更多的交通事故是追尾，停车场擦碰。汽车的市场定位不一样，自己安全意识不提高，开什么车都没用。
五菱mini ev的安全設計應該可以參考一下日本的k car這一系列的設計...謝謝分享,拍這個片真是有心了！ ：）
mini EV的價格只有k car 的1/3，參考了k car的標準它就不會做得這麼成功了。一流品牌自己定標準~Wuling是GM旗下的品牌，Test完全可以放心，不需要去refer Honda的標準。
@@eddytsin7253 五菱是自主品牌（合资自主）
@@eddytsin7253 😅不考虑乘车人安全的标准
no airbag? still a fail. but my compliments for the makers ogf this video even If I can't understand chinese they made everything clear with just the pictures and the work they did to dismount everything from the unibody of the car
是的，人民需要更好的车。
mini ev test crash, awsome.
只能算是一個體型大點的電瓶車
由體闊40公分化為150公分的自行單車
不要小看了這個小車，這是GM近年來最成功的電動車產品(Wuling是GM旗下的品牌)。反思下為什麼台灣就做不出來這麼成功的產品設計？
如果要比较有说服力，再拿一台老头乐和a级车碰撞，看看效果如何。
老头乐车牌不错啊！
最讽刺的是这种车能生产，还能销售
老头乐都能生产，有什么不能生产。合法老头乐，还要什么自行车
在大陸，人命成本比較低，可以消耗。
@@KenNY_mo 你说的对 大陆政府为了保证消耗还免费给老百姓打新冠疫苗 我们大陆人连抢残剂的机会都没有真是太不讲道理了
@@KenNY_mo 对，我们还圈养可食用人类，我们吃人的
@@KenNY_mo 摩托车的价格买一台车，安全性比摩托车高多了。而且澳洲也没有安全性标准，消费者认可的ANCAP也只是非政府第三方机构
我只想说明弘光还是比较不错因为至少不会被撞死只要稍微改造一下就行了如说前面的车头白银行的连接处那个板子在家后一点点就能保住性命玻璃也在家后一层上面再加固一下就行了这样子比较安全而那些路上了那些不少有安全隐患的电动车如果有人真的有这种电动车的话请你去查看一下他会不会有支撑住如果没有的话能说这个只是个外壳没有什么之称量什么的只是个电动车的外壳然后加上掀起步的支撑住了前面根本没啥子成到后再撞击的时候如果有改造的话前面那几个铁杆子还能等一会儿但是像这种没有啥支撑梁的什么的基本上就是玩独自己的自没用什么都没有他虽然是来电动车但是它的最大问题就是没有多很多的支撑梁儿五菱宏光还比较多至少能把命保住
Can someone summaries the video in English? Did it do good or bad?
兩台車都是電動的？
still better than a Motorcycle.
只能说是比较安全的电瓶车了
👍
五陵宏光mini ev能還賣到銷量最好的電車呢！
If government cared about a real renewable energy transformation they would adjust regulation to allow them in our cities quickly, but they don't so we won't. The Wuling would be my next car otherwise. It still has a lot of room for improvement but for under 10 grand so long as its safe, has aircon and the stated over 150km range it works for me more than the new feature rich over priced hot garbage a lot of cars are.
So, the whole car is a crumple zone?
看來這車是移動的棺材,應該停止售賣了
老头乐只是一台能遮风挡雨的电瓶车。
test is good
五菱Mini里面的结构很像日系小型车（Daihatsu Mira和Toyota Passo），一模一样，非常单薄的铁皮
日系麵包車也好不到哪裏,一分錢一分貨,要安全,價錢就會直線上升!
K-Car至少有安全氣囊，大部份新車也標配低速防碰撞等的主動安全裝置
@@herm6n 五菱miniev價格只有一般k-car一半到75%(還沒算進關稅),除非消費者收入提升到注重安全,車廠才會主打提升安全配備為主要訴求的車型.
I saw a star on the grill of the red car. Is MB building and selling these cars in China?
No, Chinese auto manufacturers are notorious for copying designs and logos from other manufacturers.
對撞的車，潰決也吸收不少力
I wish I could understand
Would like to see this kind of test for mini ev vs lcgc here in Indonesia
English subtitles please.
沒看仔細 我以為是台賓士
为什么不从源头查，从生产厂家查
Mercy Vs Wuling woooow wuling is the best, gila memang ini wuling body mmg keras bukan cuma di versi Almaz, conferro, cortez doang.. Sampai di mobil listrik mini jg kuat, lawanya bukan merek kaleng2 bos Mercy gitu, merek mobil mahal di indonesia
Emg itu mercy ya? Logonya beda gitu
@@faizdz5472 keliatanya mery gitu logo bintang 3 gitu.. Keliatanya si bro
@@faizdz5472 tp pas aku liat lagi fix mercy itu bro
TBH Wuling crash test only looked better because it was crashing a cheaply built EV car, that Cheap car is absorbing most of the impact for both of the cars.
This doesn't really proved that Wuling is safe, safer than cheaply made decorated golf cart? Yes. Safe on the road against any other cars? High likely no
U right, the uploader had same opinion- it's like a flyweight boxer smashed an amateur but get injury badly himself.
There are no cars are safe from crash.
@@bunnyfreakz you're going to sustain some sort of injury in a crash but some cars will do a better job of making a crash survivable vs fatal. A Wuling against an Ford F-150 will probably look like the red EV or worse.
Tbh I'm not from China but I do have Wuling car in my country, and almost everyone here know that Wuling body is heavier and thicker than Japanese / Korean cars with similar or even higher (but not too far) price
人家的市场本来就是走那种十八线城市县城，小道上车速不高的地方，不要当能上高速的车用
我記得有其他人測試過，兩萬人民幣寧可去買十幾年的二手車，這種低速電動車連過彎都會翻車
Mantep crumple zone nya
五菱没气囊的吗
2万 可以买个旧的名牌油车 安全性足够信赖
可是一年要多花一万多。油钱以及耗材如火花塞、机油、防冻液，还要除积碳清洗节气门，在大城市或去大城市会限行，四五年多花进去的钱就够买一台宏光mini了。
Can you add at least english subtitles? 🤔
政府應該全面取締和禁止這類危險性的（死亡盒子）車輛售賣和在街道或小路上行駛，保障民眾的生命安全。
政府应该禁止人类出门 这样才是最安全的
你安全行驶就不代表别人会安全行驶
价格才2万多 总比摩托车安全吧
没钱又啥都想要。咋不去抢
每个城市政策都不一样，稍微发达一点的城市都是禁止老头乐上路的，除了北京……就很无语
这老头乐真的有卖？从未见过这玩意，五菱的小盒子倒是见过不少！
博主太苛刻了，宏光MINI EV 已经做的很棒了，要知道他才比老头乐贵了4000块人民币，看完真心觉得五菱宏光是一家良心的造车厂。
车险怎么买？
@@xpu2etr794 MINI EV是一辆普通家用轿车，按照正常车险流程购买就好了啊。摩托车都可以买，这个车有何困难？
開ev=玩命！