I just happened to open my first bottle of Jura 10 last night. It was nice, pleasant, gentle, enjoyable. I would not say "dull" as that has a bit of a negative content. Great Scotch for a beginner I think. George Orwell spent some time on Jura to try to get well, so that is why I tried this whisky (big Orwell fan).
I kinda agree. I do believe that this should be in everyone’s stash. Like he said, it’s not a life changing whiskey with lots of layers, but it is an incredibly tasty, one dimensional whiskey that chooses a couple of really great sherry flavors and punches you in the mouth with them! It’s an intermediate Scotch that is incredibly crushable and far better than Glenlivet, Glenfiddich, Monkey Shoulder, etc. It’s an inoffensive, easy sipper…
Tried this dram and had much the same though, this might be a good choice for the starting scotch drinking who is looking to feel a balance of flavors at a low proof. However if that's what someone wants I would far recommend a Compass Box blend. But once I step out of my whisky-nerdom I realize that 99% of people walking past this on the shelf will see a cool shape, and a "10 year old single malt scotch" which is super fancy and then enjoy the relatively non aggressive flavors. Thanks for the review Bill, always great to see another Dic Tip!
The point you make about smelling the residual whiskey is something I've noticed even right after finishing a pour. I'll nose it 5 minutes later and often find it so much more inviting. It's almost always like smelling a really nice scented candle.
Haven't been on youtube for quite some time. And I immediatly noticed: WOW the quality of your videos have really gone up! The editing, everything. Amazing job! Great channel.
Jura 21 yr tide is one of my favorites. It has a cigar flavor on the finish that I've never tasted in another whiskey. Definitely worth trying if you can find it
i picked up a bottle of jura 12 year for new years, but didn't end up breaking the seal until today while watching your video about it. this is my first venture into single malt scotch as i am used to drinking canadian blended rye whiskeys but looking for something with more character. without having any exposure to any other single malt scotch, i would certainly rate this higher than "meh" as this is still lightyears ahead of the typical canadian whiskey as far as character goes. however i can see where you are coming from as i was still surprised at how "mellow" and "muted" the nose and flavors were, i was certainly expecting a lot more, although i would not say i am disappointed in any way. i am going to subscribe to your channel and will be looking forward to hearing about all the options available to me, hoping to learn of some similarly priced single malts to try in the future.
The one in this review is Jura 10. I suspect your Jura 12 is better although it's still 40% so the muted nose and taste would persist. Either way I'm glad youre enjoying it! Thanks for the sub
Thanks for the review and all the information, including the marketing “issues”. I saw a bottle of Jura Seven Wood at my local store, but the price was too steep for me to buy it. After this review, the comments to it, and other information I’ve gathered, I’m going to hold off on the Jura until I’ve tried other expressions on my (rapidly growing) list.
3 ปีที่แล้ว +1
I tried two different whiskies from the previous range of Jura, the Origin 10 which was sweet, mellow and easy to drink and the Prophecy, my favorite of the two, heavily peated, with hints of sea spray and spices, quite complex and very tasty. I think that either one of them would be much better than the Jura 10, judging by your taste notes in this review.
I bought a bottle of the Jura 10 and couldn't figure out the nose. After watching your video, I think the nose is a salty sea breeze. Peaty scotches are not my first choice but peat devotees would love it. It tasted like leather and cigarette smoke to me and I found it to be enjoyable. I'd rate it a TRY IT!
I find the 12 a significant step up flavour-wise on the 10 but wish they would follow the market and offer a higher abv. Why bottle at 40% like the Journey and the 10? They’re just losing customers. Independent bottlings are rare but worth hunting down: a Battlehill single cask 13 year old is delicious and 46%, natural presentation.
the only one I had was Jura Superstition, was higher ABV and I did like it. Other I have in my collection it is 16 yo, discontinued right now. Don’t forget it’s made by same people who makes Dalmore. Cheers Bill!
I absolutely love Jura 10. I have 4 jura bottles, their RUM and RED WINE offerings are on top of my list. To be fair, I am yet to try a Jura bottle I don't like. You absolutely MUST try, at least try, the rum cask one. So nice. I can't recommend the rum cask enough. Must be said, my palette is atrocious, so take that with a spoon full of salt, but Jura has turned into my affordable scotch brand of choice.
I´ve only tried the Journey, and that was way below meh, so I’m skipping this one. I also agree regarding the 40%. Most of the 40´s taste a bit watery to me. There’s so many great 43 and above that doesn’t break the bank out there… 😊
I agree with you on the 'dullness' however my brother got me a bottle of the journey for Xmas and I'm enjoying it a surprising amount. On the seven wood I wasn't keen but then I was a little annoyed at the time after trying the 18 and finding its chill filtered coloured and 40% which may have coloured my judgement
Great review, it is definitely good whiskey, I do miss Jura 16, I even buy tasting simpler set that has 16-year-old I think that's the best the head, but 18-year-old and five wood is also great. Definitely anyone should try it.
I think is a buy it because it's not bad and the price at $40 is pretty good for any 10yr old in the market nowadays. Yes the avb is my main negative but it's not a deal killer to buy one time. Also, I think the bottle shape has to do with the surface because a mostly common round bottle can break easier in a voyage vs the Jura bottle which has less surface making it harder to break. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.😂😂
@@TheWhiskeyDictionary yeah I wouldn't pay more than $40 for it either. I tried the 7 woods years back and it's pretty good I believe it's around $70 which it's not worth it my opinion.
The ownership of Jura has changed so many times since re-founding that I wonder if they can keep the quality up, or if they have any consistency in terms of what they are trying to accomplish with their whiskey.
I have not tried Jura. But I am American; of British, Scottish, and Irish descent. I trust my provenance in that at bare minimum the saccharine alcohol content will so melliferously assuage that inveterate anxiety that plagues the depths of my eldritch soul all day long working my ass off to just make ends meet. I am just a humble car mechanic. Whiskey of even this anemic caliber resonates and adumbrates all that is either right or wrong with this ineffable world. It will taste sweet either way. Cheers.
I consider myself to be a man of words... my lexicon overflowing with choice words for most situations... But you my friend, have outdone me. You have my respect
Thanks for the video Bill! I was trying to look for the peat information about this bottle (I never tried but the 12yo). Would you know what is the PPM level of Jura 10yo?
Tnx for the tasting tip! I really enjoy smelling empty whisky glasses the next morning but never thought of using it in this way. And yes i totally agree with you, Jura 10 is ok but boring and a bit on the sharp side. Would not buy it again
Definitely in the ignore it category. Did oddly well in my highland/islands blind though. Only $40 but better off with say Maker's Mark Cask Strength for the same price or Deanston Virgin Oak and Loch Lomond 12 for less.
You put your finger right on it, its not badly made whisky its just uninteresting, like most of the jura range I’ve had, except for the superstition which I liked. Good video by the way, enjoyed it, Slàinte
I'd agree that it's a not bad whisky, personally I wouldn't ever buy the more entry level versions. The 18 and the seven wood are ok, but I'd probably only get it if it was on offer. Good for a pour or two, but not worth having a whole bottle unless you really like it.
I got some coastal notes when I tried this, the sherry was really light (probably reused butts). But at 40% it's too thin for me. Its not bad but theres many other options out there.
I picked this up in South Carolina last year, I also feel like it's a try, but i agree, nothing special, but ok. I like sherry bombs and this isn't it. It's not heavy enough, I'm a big fan of stuff like Mac 12, GlenDronach 12, La Santa, and this stuff just feels too light.
Age statement or not, unless we're talking sub-$25 bottles, and even then with some hesitancy, I'm not buying 40% malts. I'd honestly rather buy a NAS with better credentials. Jura just ain't my thing.
That's why it took me over ten years to try this. I'll either buy cheaper stuff with the same specs or expect better specs from a single malt at the $40 price point. It should have at minimum 43% ABV. Natural presentation would help immensely in terms of having interest in trying it (no chill filtration, no added color).
I loved my visit to Jura and greatly enjoyed interacting with the knowledgeable young staff. However I am not a fan of the new style. Especially the 10 which is boring as you say. Also do not like Journey much, rather buy a blend. Instead I am buying as many bottles of Prophecy and Superstition as I can get while they are still available.
Like or Dislike: Like. The observation that 40% is what killed the whiskey is a good bottom line. Either the master distiller is doing a poor job or he's being pressured by management to dilute the product.
In the American market where whiskey is priced ridiculously high, there may be higher expectations on spec. I know I have higher expectations. Cheapest I've seen for this is $40. I want more flavor in my single malt. That means either or both higher ABV and or no chill filtration. I don't need this to be 100 proof but somewhere between 86 and 92 would be a start. 40 proof is speaking to the less engaged customer IMO. No added color is a nod to us Scotch whiskey nerds out there who don't want anything unnecessary added and put value in something being as honest and genuine as possible. So if Jura wants to attract the more engaged scotch lovers out there and not just the casual novice they should give us better specs.
@@TheWhiskeyDictionary I was lucky enough to try it when a friend brought it to a gathering. Really glad I didn't spend my money on it. There are so many great whiskeys out there that every time I get a bad one or even a mediocre one it feels like a big loss... time in my journey and enjoyment that I never get back.
Who else drinks whisky while watching whisky reviews?
I think we all do.
We all hope you do :)
I just happened to open my first bottle of Jura 10 last night. It was nice, pleasant, gentle, enjoyable. I would not say "dull" as that has a bit of a negative content. Great Scotch for a beginner I think. George Orwell spent some time on Jura to try to get well, so that is why I tried this whisky (big Orwell fan).
Yea I came across that. Didn't find a point where it made sense to include in the video but I thought that was pretty cool
I kinda agree.
I do believe that this should be in everyone’s stash.
Like he said, it’s not a life changing whiskey with lots of layers, but it is an incredibly tasty, one dimensional whiskey that chooses a couple of really great sherry flavors and punches you in the mouth with them!
It’s an intermediate Scotch that is incredibly crushable and far better than Glenlivet, Glenfiddich, Monkey Shoulder, etc.
It’s an inoffensive, easy sipper…
I concur!
I’d pick Jura 10 over Macallan 12 any day!
Jura is just incredibly crushable with no drama.
Tried this dram and had much the same though, this might be a good choice for the starting scotch drinking who is looking to feel a balance of flavors at a low proof. However if that's what someone wants I would far recommend a Compass Box blend. But once I step out of my whisky-nerdom I realize that 99% of people walking past this on the shelf will see a cool shape, and a "10 year old single malt scotch" which is super fancy and then enjoy the relatively non aggressive flavors. Thanks for the review Bill, always great to see another Dic Tip!
The point you make about smelling the residual whiskey is something I've noticed even right after finishing a pour. I'll nose it 5 minutes later and often find it so much more inviting. It's almost always like smelling a really nice scented candle.
Haven't been on youtube for quite some time. And I immediatly noticed: WOW the quality of your videos have really gone up! The editing, everything. Amazing job! Great channel.
Thanks Ellefski! Glad to have you back
Jura 21 yr tide is one of my favorites. It has a cigar flavor on the finish that I've never tasted in another whiskey. Definitely worth trying if you can find it
i picked up a bottle of jura 12 year for new years, but didn't end up breaking the seal until today while watching your video about it. this is my first venture into single malt scotch as i am used to drinking canadian blended rye whiskeys but looking for something with more character. without having any exposure to any other single malt scotch, i would certainly rate this higher than "meh" as this is still lightyears ahead of the typical canadian whiskey as far as character goes. however i can see where you are coming from as i was still surprised at how "mellow" and "muted" the nose and flavors were, i was certainly expecting a lot more, although i would not say i am disappointed in any way. i am going to subscribe to your channel and will be looking forward to hearing about all the options available to me, hoping to learn of some similarly priced single malts to try in the future.
The one in this review is Jura 10. I suspect your Jura 12 is better although it's still 40% so the muted nose and taste would persist. Either way I'm glad youre enjoying it! Thanks for the sub
Thanks for the review and all the information, including the marketing “issues”. I saw a bottle of Jura Seven Wood at my local store, but the price was too steep for me to buy it. After this review, the comments to it, and other information I’ve gathered, I’m going to hold off on the Jura until I’ve tried other expressions on my (rapidly growing) list.
I tried two different whiskies from the previous range of Jura, the Origin 10 which was sweet, mellow and easy to drink and the Prophecy, my favorite of the two, heavily peated, with hints of sea spray and spices, quite complex and very tasty. I think that either one of them would be much better than the Jura 10, judging by your taste notes in this review.
I bought a bottle of the Jura 10 and couldn't figure out the nose. After watching your video, I think the nose is a salty sea breeze. Peaty scotches are not my first choice but peat devotees would love it. It tasted like leather and cigarette smoke to me and I found it to be enjoyable. I'd rate it a TRY IT!
Background music is kinda spiritual 😁😁😁
I find the 12 a significant step up flavour-wise on the 10 but wish they would follow the market and offer a higher abv. Why bottle at 40% like the Journey and the 10? They’re just losing customers. Independent bottlings are rare but worth hunting down: a Battlehill single cask 13 year old is delicious and 46%, natural presentation.
-So what kind of barrels do you need?
-YES
the only one I had was Jura Superstition, was higher ABV and I did like it. Other I have in my collection it is 16 yo, discontinued right now. Don’t forget it’s made by same people who makes Dalmore. Cheers Bill!
I absolutely love Jura 10. I have 4 jura bottles, their RUM and RED WINE offerings are on top of my list. To be fair, I am yet to try a Jura bottle I don't like. You absolutely MUST try, at least try, the rum cask one. So nice. I can't recommend the rum cask enough.
Must be said, my palette is atrocious, so take that with a spoon full of salt, but Jura has turned into my affordable scotch brand of choice.
If I see the rum. I'll grab it 😀
I´ve only tried the Journey, and that was way below meh, so I’m skipping this one. I also agree regarding the 40%. Most of the 40´s taste a bit watery to me. There’s so many great 43 and above that doesn’t break the bank out there… 😊
Definitely a try it. Jura 10 is a good starting point, but it definitely leaves you wanting. Some of the higher proof offerings would be my next step.
I agree with you on the 'dullness' however my brother got me a bottle of the journey for Xmas and I'm enjoying it a surprising amount. On the seven wood I wasn't keen but then I was a little annoyed at the time after trying the 18 and finding its chill filtered coloured and 40% which may have coloured my judgement
Great review, it is definitely good whiskey, I do miss Jura 16, I even buy tasting simpler set that has 16-year-old I think that's the best the head, but 18-year-old and five wood is also great. Definitely anyone should try it.
The Jura 10yr is worth buying if you can get it for a good price at your local liquor store.. I bought 3 fifths and I payed about $30 per bottle..
I think is a buy it because it's not bad and the price at $40 is pretty good for any 10yr old in the market nowadays. Yes the avb is my main negative but it's not a deal killer to buy one time. Also, I think the bottle shape has to do with the surface because a mostly common round bottle can break easier in a voyage vs the Jura bottle which has less surface making it harder to break. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.😂😂
If this cost $40 near me that may have influenced my decision, but probably not. Near me it's $55
@@TheWhiskeyDictionary yeah I wouldn't pay more than $40 for it either. I tried the 7 woods years back and it's pretty good I believe it's around $70 which it's not worth it my opinion.
I was able to pick it up for 33 bucks in a sale near me, so for that price it was a great experience
The ownership of Jura has changed so many times since re-founding that I wonder if they can keep the quality up, or if they have any consistency in terms of what they are trying to accomplish with their whiskey.
I have not tried Jura. But I am American; of British, Scottish, and Irish descent. I trust my provenance in that at bare minimum the saccharine alcohol content will so melliferously assuage that inveterate anxiety that plagues the depths of my eldritch soul all day long working my ass off to just make ends meet. I am just a humble car mechanic. Whiskey of even this anemic caliber resonates and adumbrates all that is either right or wrong with this ineffable world. It will taste sweet either way. Cheers.
I consider myself to be a man of words... my lexicon overflowing with choice words for most situations...
But you my friend, have outdone me.
You have my respect
Thanks for the video Bill!
I was trying to look for the peat information about this bottle (I never tried but the 12yo). Would you know what is the PPM level of Jura 10yo?
Unfortunately I don't. I didn't come across it in my research
Tnx for the tasting tip! I really enjoy smelling empty whisky glasses the next morning but never thought of using it in this way. And yes i totally agree with you, Jura 10 is ok but boring and a bit on the sharp side. Would not buy it again
Definitely in the ignore it category. Did oddly well in my highland/islands blind though. Only $40 but better off with say Maker's Mark Cask Strength for the same price or Deanston Virgin Oak and Loch Lomond 12 for less.
You put your finger right on it, its not badly made whisky its just uninteresting, like most of the jura range I’ve had, except for the superstition which I liked. Good video by the way, enjoyed it, Slàinte
I'd agree that it's a not bad whisky, personally I wouldn't ever buy the more entry level versions. The 18 and the seven wood are ok, but I'd probably only get it if it was on offer. Good for a pour or two, but not worth having a whole bottle unless you really like it.
It's fine but it's not a bottle I reach for.
I got some coastal notes when I tried this, the sherry was really light (probably reused butts). But at 40% it's too thin for me. Its not bad but theres many other options out there.
Heh, reused butts
@@TheWhiskeyDictionary 😂😂😂
The bottle shape always has reminded me of Appleton rum bottles
I picked this up in South Carolina last year, I also feel like it's a try, but i agree, nothing special, but ok. I like sherry bombs and this isn't it. It's not heavy enough, I'm a big fan of stuff like Mac 12, GlenDronach 12, La Santa, and this stuff just feels too light.
I’ll be sure to try it out with your technique also. Great video.
Age statement or not, unless we're talking sub-$25 bottles, and even then with some hesitancy, I'm not buying 40% malts. I'd honestly rather buy a NAS with better credentials. Jura just ain't my thing.
I totally agree with you on this!! Be at least 43% please!
That's why it took me over ten years to try this. I'll either buy cheaper stuff with the same specs or expect better specs from a single malt at the $40 price point. It should have at minimum 43% ABV. Natural presentation would help immensely in terms of having interest in trying it (no chill filtration, no added color).
Jura Seven Wood is $65.99 in a local grocery store where I live.
I don´t think It´s Dull. For me, it´s a fantastic whisky. Spicy but pleasant on the taste, with a nice woody smell. tastes like an 18 year whisky.
So many bottle options... only one at 46%. I think they need to change their abv philosophy
I loved my visit to Jura and greatly enjoyed interacting with the knowledgeable young staff. However I am not a fan of the new style. Especially the 10 which is boring as you say. Also do not like Journey much, rather buy a blend. Instead I am buying as many bottles of Prophecy and Superstition as I can get while they are still available.
Having tried the ten, some years back, a smaller bottle would be no less 'meh'!
I really enjoy Jura Superstition , it's a great upgrade to the 10!
Sounds like a try it for me Bill-Cheers 🥃
Thanks....Your the best reviewer online!
Thats an awesome compliment. Thank you
I tend to be a bit of a snob when it comes to 40%ABV. I am not likely to try this on my own dime.
Like or Dislike: Like. The observation that 40% is what killed the whiskey is a good bottom line. Either the master distiller is doing a poor job or he's being pressured by management to dilute the product.
I have to think its the latter. I don't think any master distiller wants to put out product at 40%
In the American market where whiskey is priced ridiculously high, there may be higher expectations on spec. I know I have higher expectations. Cheapest I've seen for this is $40. I want more flavor in my single malt. That means either or both higher ABV and or no chill filtration. I don't need this to be 100 proof but somewhere between 86 and 92 would be a start. 40 proof is speaking to the less engaged customer IMO. No added color is a nod to us Scotch whiskey nerds out there who don't want anything unnecessary added and put value in something being as honest and genuine as possible. So if Jura wants to attract the more engaged scotch lovers out there and not just the casual novice they should give us better specs.
Who's had the Jura 12? 43%, about the only single malt reduced in price in Ontario right now.
Bomore12 review
I did one on the 15, but not the 12. I was not impressed by the 15
I must say jura bottle makes me lost all interest to buy one, it seems really dull in pictures...
Very true. It looks cheap.
This bottle was a big pile of "meh" for me. Nothing bad, but nothing to attract me to it either.
Pretty much where I landed
@@TheWhiskeyDictionary I was lucky enough to try it when a friend brought it to a gathering. Really glad I didn't spend my money on it. There are so many great whiskeys out there that every time I get a bad one or even a mediocre one it feels like a big loss... time in my journey and enjoyment that I never get back.
Agree
Woooo
6:32 “Dic Tip” 😂😂 I’m sorry I have the humor of a 9th grader
0:20 am I the only one who gets depressed thinking why I wasn't born here?
Patterson ruined Jura
It garbage straight Mickey Mouse bs.