@@tealtrim9747 This comment was literally JUST fucking made 15 minutes before yours don't call it "underrated" that's like saying Apple's new iPhone is underrated 10 seconds after it's announced
It serves no literal purpose to remove it though, in the sense of it bringing down the cost of the devices. The batteries are honestly not that expensive. Like an SE battery costs apple around 3-6$ and a 12 pro max is around 6.9-14$.
I think there should be a two different cluster battery system. One the bigger one for normal wired charging and other smaller one which acts as a capacitor for using at home for gaming and movie watching, as it will act as if we have infinite battery. It would be very convenient.
@@gammacxytwo5626 Yeah you don't need to plug them into the phone but you need to put your phone over the "wireless" charger. Think of wifi or bluetooth. You don't have to set your phone, pc, tablet, etc. over the wifi box(the modem) or a router to have wifi. You just need to stay within the range of your wifi modem or router.
Wireless-yet-stationary charging is genuinely useful though. No wires means no time spent plugging things in, and nothing that will break from being repeatedly bent.
@@accursedcursive4935 Accept the "wireless" charger has wires to plug into a wall and the charger pad.The wires can be repeatedly beat if you don't take care of it or use it as a normal cable plugged in to your phone. Such as wrapping the cable up to stuff in a pocket, pulling it, or charge a phone while use with charger standing upwards if that makes sense.
Batteries are still an important component though, you can't just phase them out entirely, what if you didn't live somewhere densely urban? What if you went hiking or camping with your friends and aren't near any facility that offers air charging? What is for most people their only method of communication would essentially become useless. Batteries are a necessary evil all we can really hope for is new forms of battery technology that are more sustainable and have longer life cycles
i bet larger devices such as tablets and laptops might eventually be able to go beyond that 5 watt limit with the added surface area for antenna their chassis could provide, it's all about how focused the EMF beam you can generate is (which is also based on frequency) and how much you can catch of it. edit: also, once processors become more efficient if we ever move past silicon power limits probably won't matter at all anymore for smaller devices
@@Akash-cm5yo yes it was 5 watts. They didn't add a faster charger until the iPhone 11 Pro and the iPhone 11 still had a 5w charger before being removed completely from the iPhone 12 box.
The one issue I could think of with battery-less phones is that sometimes, you might end up in a place where there are few working charging stations. Especially in wild areas like mountains and forests and natural reserves, no one will plant thousands of charging stations in those places. Thus, as long as these types of places remain, phone batteries will never become obsolete.
But with this, people could get their data leaked more easily by accessing the power station. People have don't that with wifi. Maybe it will work if they added a safety feature
@@heaterpastel9997 how??? the phone would only accept power, there is no reason why it would accept data without at least some software modifications to the phone
@@leventeacs6371 Imagine going on a hike in the woods and not being able to use your phone at all because they took the battery out. lol This could be useful for small things much more though. Like for example not having to plug in a wireless gamepad. If a wireless controller could use power in this way you'd never have to charge it or really need battery and it's the kinda thing that stays in your house in one room anyways
Yea that is a good visual aid :) You are going to was insane amount on energy or you have to concentrate it into a single tiny microwave beam... and that is not going to be fun flying around the room.
Really cool would be to have this technology installed in office complex, similarly like it’s done with Wi-Fi points, so you would be able to walk down a hallway and all of your devices will be still charging
*XIAOMI* : * announces a tech they're working on * *MKBHD* : * tweets about it * *Mrwhosetheboss* : * makes a whole TH-cam video exploring everything about the technology (how it works, pros and cons, etc.) * Dude, you're Legendary!! I don't care man.. to me, you're the best tech TH-camr
Yeah we’re very lucky to have mrwhosetheboss here in TH-cam. He’s a very trustable, honest and hardworking TH-camr. He definitely has a strong fanbase for that
Something not addressed here; the actual power draw of said charging station. Wireless charging is indeed highly inefficient, and the initial power draw will need to compensate for that.
The last time I heard somebody talk about 'millimetre waves was on 'Future Weapons' and it was about ADS (active denial system). Very effective in repelling angry crowds and causing skin burns. I wouldn't want a machine like that to charge any phone but I guess it could be useful against burglars and trespassers.
The important thing for me is peace of mind, like when you forget to plug your phone, and other peripherals like small lamps, headphones, controllers. It's annoying that you have to re-plug all these "wireless" devices every single time, this would make them feel truly wireless. It just depends on the cost and implementation like every new consumer technology, and probably would be more reasonable in 7-10 years. The point about lowering phone/watch batteries doesn't make sense, because the whole point of them having long battery life is that you can use them outside without worrying about recharging.
Hi everyone Now listen do u ever say why was I born or ugh I hate life well think of this all the other people who didn’t get born died of cancer or something god and your mum created you for a reason love life and live happily :videos of satisfying slime please click to watch :th-cam.com/video/kGDGWDLaou4/w-d-xo.html
after looking at arun's newest videos, i can see that arun's energy really improved over the past 2 years. he smiles more, shouts more (in a good way) and even gets more excited about the smaller things. it seems to me that this change is due to the fact that arun started taking care of his physical and mental health way more than usual, or it may be something else, who knows... but the new arun is definitely so fun to watch.
Why would we get rid of batteries? We mostly use batteries in things that are meant to be portable & aren´t able to be plugged in 24/7. Sure. You could get rid of battery devices in your home. Although most things in your home use cables instead of batteries. So yeah you might be able to power your new vibrator with that technology (although it´s questionable wether it´s efficent & cheap enough for such purposes) but you´ll always need a battery for your phone. elevators, outdoor spaces etc would mean that your phone shuts down. after all you´ll need a line of sight for this to work if you´re not blasting the entire environment with milimeter waves. and even then... ships, cars, planes, remote areas etc. won´t have good coverage and probably won´t use such a c harging device. So you´ll always need some kind of battery and especially phones will need a rather large battery (calls, videos, mobile payment, ..)
"Battery is the primary reason why we have to keep swapping phones every couple of years" No! The reason is because batteries are intentionally made not easy to replace. Make (again) batteries easy to replace, and no need to replace the phone for a dead battery.
I'm sorry but this is not true. Phones with replaceable batteries were needed to change because that phones couldn't use the new batteries as good as the first battery they used. So you still had to change that phone. To be fair, easy to replace batteries could add +2 years to the smartphones' lifetime, but it's not that huge difference because your phone will be outdated with new software updates.
What if they can make the phone with replaceable battery, just the size drop from like 4500 mAh to 2000 mAh, the average battery size before the switch to non removable battery?
Hey, I've got a weird idea, how about we make phones where you can swap out the battery. That way people can have two batteries and charge one up. Then when they need to charge up there phone they can just swap batteries, no need to leave it charging at all. And this way people can just replace old batteries instead of whole phones. I know it's crazy but if anyone here runs a smartphone company, try it, it might just work.
So place baterry and wireless charge 1micrometer away and keep a sheet of fiber glass...even though fiber glass is hight insulating...power is not lost by inverse square law
@@asrujith3784 Sure it is. It depends how big the receiver is, if the reciver is only 1um square the amount of power received is 1/4 at a distance of 1um vs full power at 0um from the source then at 2um away its 1/9th. So to counter act the 1um distance of the fiber glass the receiver in your example would need to be 4um square.
I can accept that wireless charging is more convenient. But what I don't like is all the marketing lies and deceptions. The biggest annoyance was Samsung's (?) ad that said that plugging in the socket into the wall to charge your phone is annoying; so their solution is to plug a socket into the wall to charge your phone. But instead of plugging the end of the cable directly into your phone, it's plugged into a wireless charger that you "plug" your phone into, which has waste of energy. The actual solution is to, instead of buying a wireless charger, buy multiple cables and plugs for that money. Plug one in at your bed and leave it there, always having the cable ready. Put another in your bag or something; put another in the kitchen. That's convenience with more efficient charging.
To be honest, with the lack of safety restrictions in his time I think he would be significantly more successful in this than this product will ever be!
@@inaweoftheworld At least Apple will do it right, no need to rush technology that isn't needed and is in beta stages, give it a few months and Xiaomi's will be exploding left right and centre xD
@@tommolewis3105 nahh, this technology was invented for how many years already. And by the time apple releases their own version, xiaomi will already have their next and upgraded version better than apple's. 👌Even in the video, it was mentioned that Apple's charging pad was a failure they stopped and never mind the production. See? Its not always apple, because their iphone12 charging is a slow 20W technology.
The narrator: They could even get rid of the batteries in smartphones altogether. Me: Uh huh. And what happens when your battery free smartphone is needed in a place where air charging isn't set up, hmm? It's just a brick of silicon, copper, and glass.
"Or just getting rid of the battery entirely" Apple: NOTE THAT DOWN "Batteries are the primary reason we have to keep swapping out phones every few years" Apple: Nevermind screw this idea
Without considering design, all phone should come with replaceable battery. So many smartphone are thrown out just because of that. I miss the old time where I could replace my galaxy S3 or my MacBook battery...
@@jonathaningram8157 they are replaceable, just not by the user. And besides, making the battery user replacable severely compromises the fact that phones are waterproof
Economics and science fiction are so wildly different at times, it always surprises me. When something is objectively better, but makes no financial sense when you can put the R&D and money somewhere else. It's quite facinating
@@adrixstrife exactly what i was about to say wireless electricity transfer is ridiculously inefficient and borderline impossible but definitely can't be applied in the real world
@@rice4823 100+ watts is like standing next to an exposed magnetron of a microwave... while it's working. It will fry your body in a matter of minutes.
Of course these newer devices will seem and feel prototype-y and weak. Everything starts at something. All they will do to their devices is improve them as time goes on.
this could definitely be a thing in cars, being able to have your phone charge without taking it out of your pocket while its in the car, we already have wireless android auto and apple carplay so being able to charge wirelessly would solve the issue of battery consumption due to infotainment services on long drives without having to take your phone out, plus itd be far closer to the transmitter as they could have one in the center console and one in each door card.
Imagine a restaurant or a mall installing a bunch of these. Who knows if it's healthy but it certainly would be cool to walk in and automatically have your phone start charging while you're there
Yes, let's have everyone be blasted with extra energy from radio waves for hours just to charge your phone from 5 to 6 percent in 2 hours. And believe me 5W - 4W of which your phone will use is not any good.
Everyone who knows the least bit about the electromagnetic spectrum knows if it's healthy: it is. All radio waves, including 5G millimetre waves, have a lower frequency, and thus carry less energy per photon, than visible light. Sitting next to one of these is less dangerous than sitting next to a light bulb, and much less dangerous than going outside in the sun.
The time I want my phone to have a battery is when I leave my house. Especially in the wilderness. Also, when at home, It's trivial to charge it, I don't need to carry it with me. The passive electronics bit is interesting though, however, it would still need a startup battery being able to start the communication for most of these technologies, which would of course degrade and make it harder and harder to start the bloody things.
This *is* the future, though. Us not having to plug in devices, they just charge while we walk around and do everything. At some point there might not even be battery percentage displayed. Just your phone. Regions not urbanised would be an issue though, but this kind of charging could probably be so upscaled one day that there’s literally just voltage shot everywhere needed whenever. I’ve thought about this ages before just now watching this. Glad you opened up other peoples minds about it too though.
You would need over 1000 wats to start heating up stuff surrounding the power station and the frequency is thousands of times to small to ionize anything
@@emmanuelihuoma7311 do you mean constructive interference? If yes all of the waves would need to have the same wavelength and somehow match up. Do you plan on buying 250 of those and then make them shoot the radiation on one spot to make a cup of water heat up on the one spot that they interfere constructively?
@@villain2481 all iPhones have supported fast charging since the iPhone 8 what are you on about? If you are meaning really high wattage Charing, say goodbye to your battery life in 6 months because it’s that destroyed from such an ammonia of power
Electrical engineer here; a lot of what you said about the source of inefficiencies is wrong. Look up the "inverse square law" involving magnetics and you will see why "air charging" is really really inneficient. The materials of the current wireless chargers don't matter, unless they are conductive, in which you cannot use wireless charging.
Another problem might be that, it could work fine and charge 5w while standing still. But moving it around could mess with it and the charger would have to relocate it. Then it would also depend on how long it takes to relocate the device, or if it will have some sort of tracker aswell
2:30 that's not how wireless charging works. It doesn't literally conduct electricity to your phone, it uses an alternating magnetic field to induce a current in the charging coil. The reason it's inefficient is because induction in itself is inefficient.
Induction over a long distance still has the same heat problem because of the dielectric. It may not be that much worse as current heating, but magnetic field also worsens with distance.
Here's my experience with 50 W charging, when I reach home after work, my phone is around 25% and I put my phone on charge; by the time I've freshened up and changed my phone will be at 70%. And this whole process takes around 15mins. So, yeah wireless charging is fun but ultra fast wired charging is bonkers.
Thanks!! It worked i tried with a nokia 3310 first to not crash my iphone 12 and it work and with the iphone 12 it even made the fast charger thing :D thanks fantastic i never gonna need to take charger to work again
Well with the amount of power this thing would have to put out to charge your phone over multiple meters and through obstacles, they would probably have a point. The radiation might be non-ionising but it can still heat up your tissue (like 4G and 5G can) which can also be harmful.
No the way he talks and background music and everything mixed i can understand what i am trying to learn and it makes me so happy when he even released vedio
I don't think you understand how wireless charging works. When talking about conventional wireless charging, you stated "the energy has to pass through plastic and glass, which isn't conductive". With modern wireless charging, you absolutely do NOT want conductive materials between the transmitter, and receiver. This is because it uses induction to transfer the energy. The power loss comes from converting electricity, into modulated electromagnetic pulses. These magnetic pulses "induce" similar movement of electrons in the receiver's coil, and convert them back into electricity for a net loss. The heat you experience is due to the transmitter coil being heated due to resistance and induction, as well as mosfets and other circuitry used to convert to and from an inductive load.
So this 'new' office setup has me tripping. It has me equally excited to see how simply changing the colours a bit are gonna make your office look new in each video. Would love a tour
I agree, it sounds great on paper but not so well in execution. What would be better is useing a phone powerd by the cold. *yes, Cold.* You could just put it in your freezer and boom, insta charge. The only problem there could be is the cpu making it melt. But you could make a cpu that uses very little power.
How do 1,000 people manage to comment within 2 minutes!!?
Blows my mind, thank you ❤️
FIRST
LOL
"Too good to be true"
Because you're famous
Iphone no charger
'Getting rid off batteries'
Apple: WRITE THAT DOWN
@NotLxrd lol I agree
Sorry i spelled the 'of' wrongly because english is not my first language
@NotLxrd
Samsung: gets rid of battery
Nokia:I will pretend i didn't saw that
Haha yes!
@@khtannnnnnnnnn "of" was correct lmao, "off" isn't
Just imagine someone walking near your house getting their phone charged for free
Then camping by your house 😂
Xiaomi Devs: Ah Shit, Thanks. It'll be password protected too.
@@afaqkhattak7254 😂😂😂
@@Lemoncaake 🤣🤣🤣💯💯
@@afaqkhattak7254 “Nice”
It would be tremendously inefficient. Imagine 100W of power wasted to charge at 5W
It would be far worse than that. Inverse square law.
bro this is not oil or gasoline electric coming from sun.
@@munhenfunkhenmaybe one day all of them will use solar panels :)
@@web1bastler the inverse square law assumes an omni directional source, not a focused beam.
Thats thing Is bigger than a 3kw solar inverter
"We're not gonna need batteries anymore"
Apple: heavy breathhing
Underrated comment.
Super duper scooper pooperly underrated
@@tealtrim9747 This comment was literally JUST fucking made 15 minutes before yours don't call it "underrated" that's like saying Apple's new iPhone is underrated 10 seconds after it's announced
Not really
th-cam.com/video/hhwqNRFrEEU/w-d-xo.html
“Getting rid of the battery”
Apple: Noted
It serves no literal purpose to remove it though, in the sense of it bringing down the cost of the devices. The batteries are honestly not that expensive. Like an SE battery costs apple around 3-6$ and a 12 pro max is around 6.9-14$.
@@esa9971 it is apple okay, they save any money they can and then charge more money for it
Lol
Shhh......dun give away iPhone 12 main thing!
They are not shipping with the charger and battery and maybe even the button!
#savetheearth
iPhone 15 getting rid of the phone it self
That's how I imagined wireless charging when I first heard of it
SAME
Sameee
Obvs
The air charger is awsome
Its like wireless headphones vs truly wireless headphones
I think there should be a two different cluster battery system. One the bigger one for normal wired charging and other smaller one which acts as a capacitor for using at home for gaming and movie watching, as it will act as if we have infinite battery. It would be very convenient.
APPLE after seeing this: well I guess we don't need a charging port anymore, lets remove it :) :)
I guess they are already working on it, soon Samsung will join the party🤪🤪🤪
Yea they already said they were going to remove the port lol
th-cam.com/video/Qfmeb2e_kb4/w-d-xo.html
I guess
Lol Apple has already been working on it for a few years apparently.
2040: Do you remember the days when we had to *charge* the phone?
"Yeah that's pathethic, phones nowadays has unlimited power"
By then the meme would have become real....
Do you remember the last time we don't have to pay tax for AIR?
imagine living in 2040 and still be using phones
@@biolumic5168 imagine living in 2040
@@Tonistarr lol
Now this type of wireless charging would really deserve the name "wireless" .Instead of the charging pads for phones and some tablets.
They are wireless because you don’t need to plug them in or unplug them
@@gammacxytwo5626 Yeah you don't need to plug them into the phone but you need to put your phone over the "wireless" charger. Think of wifi or bluetooth. You don't have to set your phone, pc, tablet, etc. over the wifi box(the modem) or a router to have wifi. You just need to stay within the range of your wifi modem or router.
Wireless-yet-stationary charging is genuinely useful though. No wires means no time spent plugging things in, and nothing that will break from being repeatedly bent.
@@accursedcursive4935 Accept the "wireless" charger has wires to plug into a wall and the charger pad.The wires can be repeatedly beat if you don't take care of it or use it as a normal cable plugged in to your phone. Such as wrapping the cable up to stuff in a pocket, pulling it, or charge a phone while use with charger standing upwards if that makes sense.
@@RetiredFan ....this would have wires too????
Batteries are still an important component though, you can't just phase them out entirely, what if you didn't live somewhere densely urban? What if you went hiking or camping with your friends and aren't near any facility that offers air charging?
What is for most people their only method of communication would essentially become useless.
Batteries are a necessary evil all we can really hope for is new forms of battery technology that are more sustainable and have longer life cycles
People: Oh no 5G is dangerous!
Xiaomi: Hold my Air Charger
[REDACTED] for being stupid
you know how hundreds of 5G cell towers were destroyed in Britain?
yeahhh this sure is gonna age well
@@firstnamelastname8534 did you take your anti stupid pills this morning
Hahahaha brilliant
@@firstnamelastname8534 b r u h
*”Tell me the price so I can know what organs to sell”*
lol
He's speaking from experience...
That's funny bro
Probably u sell your eyes
Oh wait u can't use it with out eyes-
Sell all of them, just in case!
Fly charging..
😂😆
apple should use that word
OTA charging
yea, i got a moth
do you think it would work for it too?
Or the apple name, iFly
i bet larger devices such as tablets and laptops might eventually be able to go beyond that 5 watt limit with the added surface area for antenna their chassis could provide, it's all about how focused the EMF beam you can generate is (which is also based on frequency) and how much you can catch of it.
edit: also, once processors become more efficient if we ever move past silicon power limits probably won't matter at all anymore for smaller devices
“Tell me the price so that i can start planning on which organs to sell”
Don’t we all?
liver..becoz already sold kidney for iphone
Chicken liver, heart, kidney?
yeah 😂 , I Agree
That's just stupidity
@@smashedpotato278 kidneys grow back, just sell your other one and keep the liver
"5W is how much the original iPhone charged with"
Bruh iPhone X didn't come with a fast charge either.
Not 5 watt tho
@@Akash-cm5yo I think it actually was. At most it was 10 watt
@@Akash-cm5yo charger in the box was 5 watts😂😂😂
@@Akash-cm5yo yes it was 5 watts. They didn't add a faster charger until the iPhone 11 Pro and the iPhone 11 still had a 5w charger before being removed completely from the iPhone 12 box.
Bruh...iPhone 12 didn't come with A CHARGER either
Nikola Tesla: Seriously guys, I was giving this to you for free.
Edit: Ni'k'ola.
Thanks for correcting me and not make fun.
Such a legend Tesla was
@Kolke ｗｈａｔ
And it was before any technology of semiconductors
@Kolke he never had kids.
@Kolke what's your age??
The one issue I could think of with battery-less phones is that sometimes, you might end up in a place where there are few working charging stations. Especially in wild areas like mountains and forests and natural reserves, no one will plant thousands of charging stations in those places. Thus, as long as these types of places remain, phone batteries will never become obsolete.
But with this, people could get their data leaked more easily by accessing the power station. People have don't that with wifi. Maybe it will work if they added a safety feature
@@heaterpastel9997 wifi transfers data, this will just transfer power
@@jh-cf3cq They might figure out a way
@@heaterpastel9997 how??? the phone would only accept power, there is no reason why it would accept data without at least some software modifications to the phone
@@jh-cf3cq Agreeable argument since I don't really know much about tech
2021: 5W it's really small.
2019 iphone: 5W it's enough
"It's the best charger ever." XD
@@chugisan6847 lol 🤣🤣🤣
2020 iphone: hmmm what's a charger?
😂
😂
"Or just getting rid of the battery entirely"
Stop giving Apple ideas yo
600 dollars more for a 1000mAh🌚
But what if you are in a rural area? How will you air charge your phone then?
We will carry 20 000 mAh power banks with us...
Don't Read My Profile
@@leventeacs6371 Imagine going on a hike in the woods and not being able to use your phone at all because they took the battery out. lol
This could be useful for small things much more though. Like for example not having to plug in a wireless gamepad. If a wireless controller could use power in this way you'd never have to charge it or really need battery and it's the kinda thing that stays in your house in one room anyways
@@oceanmew 👍
In 20 years (kinda), i'll go to a restaurant with a 10% battery, eat for 30 minutes, pay the bills and come home with 100%.
Make it 10 in developed countries
Imagine in the future you don't even think "Oh my battery kinda low, let me charge first before going out"
Not a bad Idea
@@protor6277
Except when going on a jungle trekking
@@hackerhacker3667 in 20 years you gonna have bigger battery in small size lol
It charges the air instead of the phone, the phone being charged is just a side effect
Lmao
"Tell me the price, So I can start planning with organs to sell" - Arun
yeah
Oh hell no
Some boy in China sold his kidney for iPhone.
那已经是十年前的新闻了
@@TamagoEgg that's where selling kidney for iphone story began. Lmao
"Getting rid of Batteries"
Apple : InTeReStInG...
@Abdullah Noushad lol
The rest of the companies 1 or 2 years later: *hmm might as well do it too*
👁👁
HoW AbOuT wE rEpLaCe iT WiTh aN aPpLe
You gotta buy the battery on its own lol and then the cameras and then youre gonna buy a box without a phone
its like filling up a water bottle with the lid still on and with a garden hose with sprinkler attachment from 10 meters away
Oh, that's coming. Just wait
This is correctly said.
Yea that is a good visual aid :)
You are going to was insane amount on energy or you have to concentrate it into a single tiny microwave beam... and that is not going to be fun flying around the room.
Not enough. You also have shaky hands.
Also blindfolded
Really cool would be to have this technology installed in office complex, similarly like it’s done with Wi-Fi points, so you would be able to walk down a hallway and all of your devices will be still charging
I can't stop admiring hair light after the studio tour 😂😂
Don't Read My Profile
God yess..same..! once you've seen it you can't unsee that, the importance of hair lights and the colour lights that gives him an outline
Broo mee too
Same
😂😂
*XIAOMI* : * announces a tech they're working on *
*MKBHD* : * tweets about it *
*Mrwhosetheboss* : * makes a whole TH-cam video exploring everything about the technology (how it works, pros and cons, etc.) *
Dude, you're Legendary!!
I don't care man.. to me, you're the best tech TH-camr
Jerryrigeverything:but is it durable enough?
Can it beat Goku tho
yup
Yeah we’re very lucky to have mrwhosetheboss here in TH-cam. He’s a very trustable, honest and hardworking TH-camr. He definitely has a strong fanbase for that
@@MrIDGAF yeah
"I realized I've been explaining for 4minutes"
*Checking the time bar*
Actually 4mins..
theres Arun for u
Literally
Damn son you are so true... #mindblown
Something not addressed here; the actual power draw of said charging station. Wireless charging is indeed highly inefficient, and the initial power draw will need to compensate for that.
Nikola Tesla would have been very happy today
He will not happy, Nikola wanted to free for everyone. Here case is opposite
Who is he
@@hater5593 nikola tesla
@@hater5593 ?
@@surjeetsinha2893 absolutely right
2 months of usage later: **HBO renewed the contract for Chernobyl 2.0**
😂😂😂, that was a good one
Legit what I was thinking when I saw it as air charging
I didn't get it🥺
@@aryxn_ The radiation
The last time I heard somebody talk about 'millimetre waves was on 'Future Weapons' and it was about ADS (active denial system). Very effective in repelling angry crowds and causing skin burns. I wouldn't want a machine like that to charge any phone but I guess it could be useful against burglars and trespassers.
Apple after removing everything: well nice we do not need anything
F apple and all the morons who think it is "cool"
more like, invisible phone would be $1000
@@バイロン-v6g u missed a zero
and other smartphone removes it to copying apple hahaha just like samsung mocking apple for removing charger and did it next year, apple is the best
iDust in 2077
The important thing for me is peace of mind, like when you forget to plug your phone, and other peripherals like small lamps, headphones, controllers. It's annoying that you have to re-plug all these "wireless" devices every single time, this would make them feel truly wireless.
It just depends on the cost and implementation like every new consumer technology, and probably would be more reasonable in 7-10 years.
The point about lowering phone/watch batteries doesn't make sense, because the whole point of them having long battery life is that you can use them outside without worrying about recharging.
For low power devices, a solar panel makes more sense. I can't see how this would be all that useful...
6:51 *"or just getting rid of the battery entirely"*
Apple - *say no more*
Me: He is running out words now.
Mrwhosetheboss: I don't think so
😄😄😄
Yes
Legendary 😂
‘I bet my bottom dollar’ 😂
Mrwhosetheboss dictionary confirmed.
"We're not going to need a battery anymore"
Apple: NOTE THAT DOWN!
Charles The French!!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And a charging port
That would be 1 kidney please for a battery that is not included in the new iPhone
Don't Read My Profile
Smart phones with Swappable batteries back in the days were so advanced
"Put this energy towards recycling batteries better"
Agreed.
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
L i t e n
Me: thinking that was the last reason
Arun: BUT THAT'S NOT IT-
One last thing
it's there strategy to Advertise there product 😁😁😁
Hi everyone Now listen do u ever say why was I born or ugh I hate life well think of this all the other people who didn’t get born died of cancer or something god and your mum created you for a reason love life and live happily :videos of satisfying slime please click to watch :th-cam.com/video/kGDGWDLaou4/w-d-xo.html
Nobody: Cares
"Legen... and i hope u are not lactose intolerant because the next word is ...dary"Stinson Barney Stinson
Underrated
th-cam.com/video/hhwqNRFrEEU/w-d-xo.html
Joseph joestar
Didn't understand
after looking at arun's newest videos, i can see that arun's energy really improved over the past 2 years. he smiles more, shouts more (in a good way) and even gets more excited about the smaller things. it seems to me that this change is due to the fact that arun started taking care of his physical and mental health way more than usual, or it may be something else, who knows... but the new arun is definitely so fun to watch.
Anyone noticed how he said he’s been “dropping 4 minutes”at exactly 4 minutes🧐😨
lol
4:00
That's ultimate precision.
Because he has a goddamn stopwatch going on. 🤦♂ dumdum use brain next time
@@Piyushrahi i don’t know that u wanna joking or u just dumb.
But it’s just editing, why using stopwatch lol
"We're not gonna need batteries"
Other comments : Apple noting it down
My brain : Samsung, don't mock then copy this
Samsung stronkest bestest best comments incoming
Even as a samsung fanboy, i somewhat have to agree lol
@@tudbut It is a little absurd how you only somewhat agree with it in spite of being a fanatic.
Samsung fan
Not just Samsung literally everyone will do that
This is more like "True Wireless Charging" just like how we call today's wireless earbuds "TWS Earbuds"
Yeah
Check out my S21 ultra vs Pixel 5 review.
Don't Read My Profile
What is TWS?
@@blueshanks1 True Wireless Stereo
Why would we get rid of batteries?
We mostly use batteries in things that are meant to be portable & aren´t able to be plugged in 24/7. Sure. You could get rid of battery devices in your home. Although most things in your home use cables instead of batteries. So yeah you might be able to power your new vibrator with that technology (although it´s questionable wether it´s efficent & cheap enough for such purposes) but you´ll always need a battery for your phone. elevators, outdoor spaces etc would mean that your phone shuts down. after all you´ll need a line of sight for this to work if you´re not blasting the entire environment with milimeter waves. and even then... ships, cars, planes, remote areas etc. won´t have good coverage and probably won´t use such a c harging device. So you´ll always need some kind of battery and especially phones will need a rather large battery (calls, videos, mobile payment, ..)
"Battery is the primary reason why we have to keep swapping phones every couple of years"
No!
The reason is because batteries are intentionally made not easy to replace.
Make (again) batteries easy to replace, and no need to replace the phone for a dead battery.
Uhm my reason is more that my displays are burning in....on 2 Samsungs and now on my Huawei
@@DanielS93 my reason is me breaking them by mistake either me falling with the phone in the pocket and cracking the display, or I dropp it
If phone had removable battery it will not be water proof and stylish 👍
I'm sorry but this is not true. Phones with replaceable batteries were needed to change because that phones couldn't use the new batteries as good as the first battery they used. So you still had to change that phone. To be fair, easy to replace batteries could add +2 years to the smartphones' lifetime, but it's not that huge difference because your phone will be outdated with new software updates.
What if they can make the phone with replaceable battery, just the size drop from like 4500 mAh to 2000 mAh, the average battery size before the switch to non removable battery?
'Getting rid off the phone'
Apple: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN!
😂😂
hahahahahahahaahah
Eyyy Charles is my favourite too
@Harshit Kaushal No phone, just the box. That will only cost you $10,000 sir
*Getting rid of customer's clothes
Ur voice is so nice ❤️
😍😍😍
Avenger 🔥🔥🔥
Watch this verified comment get 1k likes lol
Proof that checkmark = likes
It's a really crappy channel
@Fenaz mohammed shut up
Hey, I've got a weird idea, how about we make phones where you can swap out the battery. That way people can have two batteries and charge one up. Then when they need to charge up there phone they can just swap batteries, no need to leave it charging at all. And this way people can just replace old batteries instead of whole phones.
I know it's crazy but if anyone here runs a smartphone company, try it, it might just work.
I just appreciate how Mrwhosetheboss didnt go for the 8 minute mark.
I can listen him hours and hours and will not get tired at all
He doesn't have to..
But why would he need to?
Do you not appreciate his content enough for him to make more money out of ads or why do you „appreciate“ that so much? :D
he doesn't need ad revenues he's already wealthy
Xiaomi: We created and perfected Air Charging .
MWTB: Imma bout to end their innovation
Where did they mention "perfected" its a prototype ffs
They didn't create it. They didn't perfect it. And you really had to use a meme template. Fails all around really.
Wireless charging inefficiency is not about "conducting" its about loss of power due to the inverse square law primarily.
Exactly! When you invert a square you get a circle, and you can't fit a square peg into a round hole.
So place baterry and wireless charge 1micrometer away and keep a sheet of fiber glass...even though fiber glass is hight insulating...power is not lost by inverse square law
@@asrujith3784 Sure it is. It depends how big the receiver is, if the reciver is only 1um square the amount of power received is 1/4 at a distance of 1um vs full power at 0um from the source then at 2um away its 1/9th. So to counter act the 1um distance of the fiber glass the receiver in your example would need to be 4um square.
exactly. Wanted to tell this
Since it it directed energy (narrow beam) inverse square law barely applies.
I can accept that wireless charging is more convenient. But what I don't like is all the marketing lies and deceptions.
The biggest annoyance was Samsung's (?) ad that said that plugging in the socket into the wall to charge your phone is annoying; so their solution is to plug a socket into the wall to charge your phone. But instead of plugging the end of the cable directly into your phone, it's plugged into a wireless charger that you "plug" your phone into, which has waste of energy.
The actual solution is to, instead of buying a wireless charger, buy multiple cables and plugs for that money. Plug one in at your bed and leave it there, always having the cable ready. Put another in your bag or something; put another in the kitchen. That's convenience with more efficient charging.
I liked how he notice small details, like he noticed that 69% charging level.
Nice
nice
nice
Nice
Nice
Tesla's soul must've turned today in his grave.
To be honest, with the lack of safety restrictions in his time I think he would be significantly more successful in this than this product will ever be!
Don't Read My Profile
Yes, can you imagine a world without inductive coupling? Goodbye everthing we have today.
Especially as he was doing wireless power in the 1800's
Tesla live in the wrong time
Apple: This is AirPower
Xiaomi air charging: Nope
Apple In 2030: AirPower, a revolutionary new and innovative product. 🤣
Khup Bhari 😂😂😂😂
@@inaweoftheworld At least Apple will do it right, no need to rush technology that isn't needed and is in beta stages, give it a few months and Xiaomi's will be exploding left right and centre xD
@@tommolewis3105 nahh, this technology was invented for how many years already. And by the time apple releases their own version, xiaomi will already have their next and upgraded version better than apple's. 👌Even in the video, it was mentioned that Apple's charging pad was a failure they stopped and never mind the production. See? Its not always apple, because their iphone12 charging is a slow 20W technology.
@@tommolewis3105 apple fanboy LMAO
The narrator: They could even get rid of the batteries in smartphones altogether.
Me: Uh huh. And what happens when your battery free smartphone is needed in a place where air charging isn't set up, hmm? It's just a brick of silicon, copper, and glass.
"Or just getting rid of the battery entirely"
Apple: NOTE THAT DOWN
"Batteries are the primary reason we have to keep swapping out phones every few years"
Apple: Nevermind screw this idea
Apple: But what if you still need batteries to use your phone BUT WE DON't PROVIDE THEM ABSOLUTE GENIUS
Without considering design, all phone should come with replaceable battery. So many smartphone are thrown out just because of that. I miss the old time where I could replace my galaxy S3 or my MacBook battery...
Yes
@@jonathaningram8157 they are replaceable, just not by the user. And besides, making the battery user replacable severely compromises the fact that phones are waterproof
@@jonathaningram8157 Agreed.
People afraid of 5g.
Xiaomi: hold my beer, i’ll freak out those ppl
Seriously 5g in california and some european states is banned
I still don't get why people are scared of 5G. Even their grandkids will die before the radiation destroys one of their cells
@@Tom_Stevens617 especially those Karens
This is why education is important, 5g frequency is not high enough to fry ur brain or cause any harmful radiation.
@@Tom_Stevens617 stfu trailer park dude
Appreciate the attention to detail with saying "spent the last 4 minutes..." at 4:00.
IKR?!
Attention to detail 😂
On point... nice
Economics and science fiction are so wildly different at times, it always surprises me. When something is objectively better, but makes no financial sense when you can put the R&D and money somewhere else. It's quite facinating
xiaomi: makes air charging
physics: Nah u cant do that.
Happy Boi actually u can. By Tesla power
Nicola Tesla did that a lifetime ago
@@johnsnow9703 he did a life time ago yes, but let it go because he knew how inefficient his invention was.
@@adrixstrife exactly what i was about to say wireless electricity transfer is ridiculously inefficient and borderline impossible but definitely can't be applied in the real world
But, actually you can. The question is, is it something worth doing.
I heard about it. They'll make it better in the future.
Lets just hope its 100+ wats
@@rice4823 nah fam I don't wanna get blasted into bits by a 100 Watt 5Gmm Wave throughout my house...I am mentally not ok with it ...
@@rice4823 100+ watts is like standing next to an exposed magnetron of a microwave... while it's working. It will fry your body in a matter of minutes.
And Who told you that
Of course these newer devices will seem and feel prototype-y and weak. Everything starts at something. All they will do to their devices is improve them as time goes on.
I brought my charger
Me: *brings out a pc case sized charger*
Lol
😆😆
Don't Read My Profile
What is the issue in it?, Because this charger is not travelling with you...
this could definitely be a thing in cars, being able to have your phone charge without taking it out of your pocket while its in the car, we already have wireless android auto and apple carplay so being able to charge wirelessly would solve the issue of battery consumption due to infotainment services on long drives without having to take your phone out, plus itd be far closer to the transmitter as they could have one in the center console and one in each door card.
Imagine a restaurant or a mall installing a bunch of these. Who knows if it's healthy but it certainly would be cool to walk in and automatically have your phone start charging while you're there
It might make people go to malls again.
Yes, let's have everyone be blasted with extra energy from radio waves for hours just to charge your phone from 5 to 6 percent in 2 hours. And believe me 5W - 4W of which your phone will use is not any good.
@@zrider100z radio waves aren’t ionising radiation they aren’t gonna harm you
@@GalacticTommy yes that's because we have the currently required maximum radiation limits for phones.
Everyone who knows the least bit about the electromagnetic spectrum knows if it's healthy: it is. All radio waves, including 5G millimetre waves, have a lower frequency, and thus carry less energy per photon, than visible light. Sitting next to one of these is less dangerous than sitting next to a light bulb, and much less dangerous than going outside in the sun.
“tell me the price so I can plan what organs to sell”-Mrwhosetheboss
@Loli4lyf pause
@Loli4lyf oh shit
finally my little brothers are going to be useful!
@@Sinfoniia lmao
😂😂😂😂😂
"Just tell me the price,
So i can decide which organ to sell "
I just died 😂
should probably pick a different organ then. the goal is to use it! 😉😂
@ i also thought about the same thing. So virtual jinx , i guess
Me too
th-cam.com/video/dQw4w9WgXcQ/w-d-xo.html&feature=share
Don't Read My Profile
The time I want my phone to have a battery is when I leave my house.
Especially in the wilderness.
Also, when at home, It's trivial to charge it, I don't need to carry it with me.
The passive electronics bit is interesting though, however, it would still need a startup battery being able to start the communication for most of these technologies, which would of course degrade and make it harder and harder to start the bloody things.
"I realised that i basically dropped a duece for 4 min on this product" says it at the 4:00 mark...
Thats comitment
Don't Read My Profile
That’s*
OMG I didn't realize that!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA UR RIGHT ABIIII
IPhone 13 be like: so no batteries now....
Which is a great thing
@@Tom_Stevens617 yes it reduce the weight of the phone
@@rahulm9305 ikr
Battery is sold separately
@@Tom_Stevens617 how would you leave your phone as there would be no air charging out side??
So I can start planning what organs to sell
-mrwhoistheboss
remove that "i"
@@its.pheonix and add the *e*
capitalise the m too
This *is* the future, though. Us not having to plug in devices, they just charge while we walk around and do everything. At some point there might not even be battery percentage displayed. Just your phone.
Regions not urbanised would be an issue though, but this kind of charging could probably be so upscaled one day that there’s literally just voltage shot everywhere needed whenever.
I’ve thought about this ages before just now watching this. Glad you opened up other peoples minds about it too though.
‘Tell me the price so I know how many organs I have to sell’ * Arun being a real *BOSS* for 2 seconds straight
Nobody:
Not even an insect:
MrWhoseTheBoss: "Tell us the price so that we know which organ to sell" 😂😂😂😂
He's not lying 😂😂😭
@@shivamxd4026 yeah, but people will buy iPhones and it's chargers with their kidneys instead of this😂😂😂
Should I sell my Kidney?
69th like nicce
Not even an insect, Because insects don't have organs! 😂😂😂😂
I am just thinking about what will happen to our body with those heavy electromagnetic waves passing through our room into the phone? is this safe?
You would need over 1000 wats to start heating up stuff surrounding the power station and the frequency is thousands of times to small to ionize anything
@@panzer_hd3519 let's not forget other waves we are likely exposed to too alongside this one when it comes. They all add up.
More likely you will get charged too 😆 🤣
@@emmanuelihuoma7311 do you mean constructive interference? If yes all of the waves would need to have the same wavelength and somehow match up. Do you plan on buying 250 of those and then make them shoot the radiation on one spot to make a cup of water heat up on the one spot that they interfere constructively?
@@rhazenrizky Thats great brother we will last longer 🤣
1:29 Right on! Perfect explanation, because sometimes, the power just runs around in the room and never gets to the phone.
0:29 true redditor
Make meme compliations than cut screams because memes can contain cut screams in it
Ok
cringe
@@demh-x9t sorry if it offended you 😭😭👊🏻
cringe
Apple after seeing this: hurry!!!! Remove the charging port
They had similar patterns that they filed in 2017 for the technology, they have probably been working on it for a very long time behind scenes
Lol
@@Noaddedsalt01 Apple can't even produce fast charging🤣
@@villain2481 all iPhones have supported fast charging since the iPhone 8 what are you on about? If you are meaning really high wattage Charing, say goodbye to your battery life in 6 months because it’s that destroyed from such an ammonia of power
@@Noaddedsalt01 My android has 65W fast charger. I've been using this phone for 2 years. Keep using old ass features 😂😂
Arun: *sees 69%"
Also Arun: "noice"
Noice
a man of culture as well
69th like
I see your a man of culture as well
Do you mean, *everyone that has a humor*
Electrical engineer here; a lot of what you said about the source of inefficiencies is wrong. Look up the "inverse square law" involving magnetics and you will see why "air charging" is really really inneficient. The materials of the current wireless chargers don't matter, unless they are conductive, in which you cannot use wireless charging.
I love how when he said he spent 4 minutes talking about the idea, it was exactly at 4:00 😂
Illuminati confirmed
Cool brain yo
69th like ;)
NOW ALL THE "APPLE SOLD BATTERY SEPARATELY MEME" SOUNDS LIKE A LEGIT PLAN WTF??!!!!
It's all coming together
Just like the passionfruit IPhoney
Another problem might be that, it could work fine and charge 5w while standing still. But moving it around could mess with it and the charger would have to relocate it. Then it would also depend on how long it takes to relocate the device, or if it will have some sort of tracker aswell
OK why we are still here at 5g just to suffer from hearing this...
@@10suwapatnanthawipat45 5 Watts, not gigas
@@shadow20482 he is talking about 5G
@@fhudufin no, he is talking about Wireless charging
@@shadow20482 i dont see why he would be talking about gigas
Did this dude take a class on “ how to talk with your hands “ or “ what to do with your hands 101”
"or just getting rid of the battery entirely"
I know it's easy to forget about it these days, but people tend to go outside once in a while...
People are discussing charging via 5G mobile data signal for ‘outside’ already! Whatever next?
@@markbennett6658 really
@@Sciptopia most likely since they use the same waves as 5g
Who knows maybe Starlink will beam forward power from its solar panels along with data.
Wow, you're slow.
2:30 that's not how wireless charging works. It doesn't literally conduct electricity to your phone, it uses an alternating magnetic field to induce a current in the charging coil. The reason it's inefficient is because induction in itself is inefficient.
Noice
Nice
Induction over a long distance still has the same heat problem because of the dielectric. It may not be that much worse as current heating, but magnetic field also worsens with distance.
Yes right...
Finally someone who knows how it work, please verify your source before uploading @Mrwhosetheboss
Here's my experience with 50 W charging, when I reach home after work, my phone is around 25% and I put my phone on charge; by the time I've freshened up and changed my phone will be at 70%. And this whole process takes around 15mins. So, yeah wireless charging is fun but ultra fast wired charging is bonkers.
What is your device?
Such fast charging is gonna degrade the battery quickly
@@krtkks I'm not planning on keeping my smartphone for 5 years.
5 watts isn't enough right but technically it's really useful as it will increase the battery life and wont damage the battery cuz its just 5 watts
@@devanshsharma6721 Yaa but extra heat generated will be same as using a 30-40 watt charger
I remember when Valve announced in like 2007 that they are working on eliminating internet latency. That didn't go far.
How to AirCharge: put your phone in the microwave
lmao
BRO WHY NOT WORK??^!?!?!?!?!??!?!?Ü!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!
Omg I destroyed my phone!!!
ITS NOT WORKING!!!
Thanks!! It worked i tried with a nokia 3310 first to not crash my iphone 12 and it work and with the iphone 12 it even made the fast charger thing :D thanks fantastic i never gonna need to take charger to work again
Oh the conspiracy theorists are going to have a field day with this
"XIAOMI AIR CHARGING CAUSES AUTISM, I HAVE PROOF ON FACEBOOK!"
And my dads finna belive dems
Well with the amount of power this thing would have to put out to charge your phone over multiple meters and through obstacles, they would probably have a point. The radiation might be non-ionising but it can still heat up your tissue (like 4G and 5G can) which can also be harmful.
@@netii126 Yeahhh...
@@netii126 why would any company make a product that harms its customers? that just seems unhelpful
This guy's voice and and accent is so relaxing 😍🎉
That's gay
I agree
Ya
Yeah I want him too narrate my life
No the way he talks and background music and everything mixed i can understand what i am trying to learn and it makes me so happy when he even released vedio
I don't think you understand how wireless charging works. When talking about conventional wireless charging, you stated "the energy has to pass through plastic and glass, which isn't conductive". With modern wireless charging, you absolutely do NOT want conductive materials between the transmitter, and receiver. This is because it uses induction to transfer the energy. The power loss comes from converting electricity, into modulated electromagnetic pulses. These magnetic pulses "induce" similar movement of electrons in the receiver's coil, and convert them back into electricity for a net loss. The heat you experience is due to the transmitter coil being heated due to resistance and induction, as well as mosfets and other circuitry used to convert to and from an inductive load.
2011: Wireless Charging
2020: Air Charging
2030: *MICROWAVE CHARGING*
You mean 2009
*microwave meme*
yikes
So this 'new' office setup has me tripping. It has me equally excited to see how simply changing the colours a bit are gonna make your office look new in each video. Would love a tour
This dude can make or break a whole COMPANY"S product with speaking for 10 mins
Yeah...I mean he's seriously made me realise how much of a backlash Xiaomi is gonna face in a couple of months...
I agree, it sounds great on paper but not so well in execution.
What would be better is useing a phone powerd by the cold.
*yes, Cold.*
You could just put it in your freezer and boom, insta charge.
The only problem there could be is the cpu making it melt. But you could make a cpu that uses very little power.