Thank you for the information. How we can remove the contact pair intersection while defining the interaction between the two layer. The problem I face is stated below: THE SLAVE SURFACES ASSEMBLY_Layer 9 AND ASSEMBLY_Layer 10 INTERSECT EACH OTHER. THEY ARE PAIRED WITH MASTER SURFACES ASSEMBLY_LAYERM9 AND ASSEMBLY_LAYERM10 THAT ALSO INTERSECT EACH OTHER. IF BOTH PAIRS ARE *CONTACT PAIRs, THESE TWO PAIRS SHOULD NOT BE SIMULTANEOUSLY PRESENT IN A STEP BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE CONVERGENCE PROBLEMS; USE *MODEL CHANGE,TYPE=CONTACT PAIR TO REMOVE ONE OF THEM. IF BOTH ARE *TIE PAIRS, THE REDUNDANT TIES WILL BE REMOVED AUTOMATICALLY. IF ONE PAIR IS *TIE AND ANOTHER IS *CONTACT PAIR, REMOVE ONE OF THEM.
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Semi-Final - SEN vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IewhVY9cAmQ/mqdefault.jpg)
this tutorial is very helpful .thank u sir for your valuable information
very helpful indeed. Why not to now convert the theory into an example :) and may be we can learn more from you.
Could you please tell me how to determine the contact area between different parts of an assembly using Abaqus software in case of "GENERAL CONTACT" ?
*Contact
*contact Inclusions, All exteriors
with different surface intaraction...?
Thank you for the information. How we can remove the contact pair intersection while defining the interaction between the two layer. The problem I face is stated below:
THE SLAVE SURFACES ASSEMBLY_Layer 9 AND ASSEMBLY_Layer 10 INTERSECT EACH OTHER. THEY ARE PAIRED WITH MASTER SURFACES ASSEMBLY_LAYERM9 AND ASSEMBLY_LAYERM10 THAT ALSO INTERSECT EACH OTHER. IF BOTH PAIRS ARE *CONTACT PAIRs, THESE TWO PAIRS SHOULD NOT BE SIMULTANEOUSLY PRESENT IN A STEP BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE CONVERGENCE PROBLEMS; USE *MODEL CHANGE,TYPE=CONTACT PAIR TO REMOVE ONE OF THEM. IF BOTH ARE *TIE PAIRS, THE REDUNDANT TIES WILL BE REMOVED AUTOMATICALLY. IF ONE PAIR IS *TIE AND ANOTHER IS *CONTACT PAIR, REMOVE ONE OF THEM.
i have same problem
I also have the same issue