@@v4v819 I think it's because it's a lot harder to excel as a smaller player similar to basketball. Which is why in order to do so you must come up with unique ways to differentiate yourself from the rest.
@@AdamOBrien-e4p I dig your theory! I think if smaller kids was encouraged to see it as a challenge not a handicap then there would be more great players given what your theory reveals about what makes a great player great compared to great talent without a need to better himself...
as a kings fan, i always looked at the difference between Blake Lizotte and PLD. Lizotte is listed at 5’9 although he looks way smaller (i’d say like 5’7). Lizzo is an absolute hound, constantly forchecking, back checking, stick checking, body checking. whereas PLD just looks lazy out there and doesn’t have a care in the world. i always thought that if PLD had Lizzo’s mentality, he would be an absolute superstar. but there’s a reason Lizotte is built like this, because he had to be.
Brad Marchand, Martin St Louis, Theoren Fleury, Nathan Gerbe, Alex DeBrincat, Patrick Kane, Cole Caufield, Artemi Panarin, Kirill Kaprizov, etc... I'm sure Im forgetting some players but there are tons of high scoring NHLers who have proven that you can get by in the Show being under 6'
Anyone got any initial thoughts on the top 5 tallest teams. He mentioned the bruins and Panthers, but the entire Blackhawks defense is 6'2+. Heck Alex Vlasic is 6'7"
I am lacking words to tell you how good that video is. Now days 90% of videos and article are lacking relevant information and correlation between statements. What you just did is captivating, informative and is applicable to the past and future of hockey. Thank you very much for that! PS: there is one thing I will say about the part where you talk about McDavid's speed and how other players can match his speed. I truly don't believe anyone can match his speed with the puck. Without it you are correct, but no player skates like him with the puck.
Once I did a calculation of how many players in the top 100 scorers of all time (and playoff scorers) were at or below current NHL average (6'0, 200lbs). 46% of all time point scorers were below that (including critically, Gretzky) and 43% of all time playoff scorers. So sure, having some size benefits players, but clearly its infinitely more about HOW you play vs how tall you are.
The average height of an North American man is 5'9, considering in the last draft 3 players below 5'10 were drafted, I'm going to assume that being big in hockey is the answer.
It's incredibly rare to have the kind of talent the top 100 scorers all time have though. Size doesn't matter for them because they have extremely high-level skill that separates them from everyone else. To see if size matters you have to look at third/fourth-liners or second/third-pair defensemen, because their skill level is closer to the "average" of the league and thus isn't something that can separate them from the rest of the players.
@@sophiewang1025 Totally agree. Size matters, but I think it doesn't matter as much as some people believe. There probably is a little bit of selection bias where coaches prefer bigger players and penalize smaller players leading to less opportunities and game time. With that said being bigger for sure is optimally selected for otherwise more statistically short players (sub 5'9) would be in the league.
If you're under 6 feet then you can't help your team get deep in the playoffs but you can become an all star in the regular season on your frazzle dazzle but you're be injured or rag dolled in the playoffs and the wear and tear at the size will break you before the second round begins...
In that clip of Saros you can actually see him set his left skate in anticipation of pushing off to his right…. man, I really appreciate your vids thanks!🎉
There are small players that play big and big players that play small. Comparatively small 6’0” Demitri Kulikov plowed 6’8” Matt Rempe like s pile of snow, while Ryan Lomberg, who no matter what metrics say cannot be taller than 5’8” because im taller than him, never gets pushed around.
This is one of the more fascinating aspects of the game to me. It seems like a mix of size vs speed is always best. As a Devils fan, we used to be known as a VERY physical team back in the day. The new focus on speed and skill got us Jack and Luke, Bratt, Hischier, but that was a clear problem last year when teams made a point of physically steamrolling us. Fitzgerald went and got McDermid ... because he had to, and then there was a clear focus on getting bigger and more physical players this offseason. I hope the balance is right now.
Love how you showed Makars poke check against McDavid in the playoffs. Him and Towes put on a masterclass against McDavid and Drai in the playoffs. It’s a thing of beauty
That wcf was the only time I've seen McDavid suprised and thrown off by someone else's speed. That Avs speed completely neutralized his greatest strength.
@@Markymark-gg6qf They did nothing special. McDavid doesn’t look like McDavid against the Avs, sorry bud. Ive seen no pair do better against Drai and McDavid in the playoffs than Towes and Makar, not sure what to tell ya. The times I’ve seen them play against one another in the playoffs Drai and McDavid were also on the same line. Not sure why you’re so triggered lol
Glad to see you have a balanced take on this. There's no better time to be a smaller player in the NHL, but it's still a game played on ice. If weight (not to mention reach) didn't matter on ice, curlers wouldn't obsess over stone weight. Yes a player is mobile and can change direction very quickly these days, but when there is contact, suddenly weight matters a lot on the ice. Posture and speed can help a tough small player overcome some of this effect, but there are also guys out there who have speed, skill, *and* size.
What about Theo Fleury at 5’6” and Nathan Gerbe at 5’5” both brilliant players. It’s not all about being big, but you’re right that small players always get discarded as not good enough, but I’ve met enough smaller players over the years that could’ve matched many in the NHL in their day
I love your videos, if you could get to it, I'd very much appreciate it as a Devils fan a deep-dive into why they failed this past season after a record-setting campaign and after making some offseason additions whether or not they can actually become legit contenders.
You say Bedard Should take lessons from Gretzky when it comes to avoiding being hit. I agree, but he should also look at the guy who Gretzky looked at and learned from when he was 15 years old; Bobby Clarke. Clarke found ways to avoid but also deal with it when he had to. Look at him, it's amazing that he was part of the 1970's Flyers team and not only survived but thrived. That alone puts him up there as one of the greats in my book.
Patrick Kane used to and probably still does reach out to these guys for tips on not getting hit. Connor Bedard CAN'T get hit. Period. And dealing it out is all timing. But at the end of the day you have to maul other teams, you can't have 5 Connor Bedards (IMHO).
After the 05 lockout, guys who could skate and make plays were put on a pedestal as the game became more about the ability to possess the puck and generate opportunities. Smaller guys all of a sudden had an advantage. Now the bigger guys have adjusted their games to be much better skaters than big guys were 15 years ago so the edge smaller guys had is now becoming extinct, IMO. I think the lanky ectomorph build will be taking over the game soon. Like you said, tall and lanky enough to protect pucks, slender enough to skate w speed and agility but yet a project able frame for strength.
I wonder how Bedard would do with wood sticks? As an Oilers fan totally agree with your views on Skinner, down way too soon. I think goalies would be more successful if they learned how to poke check. Rare to see now. Great video.
I also always think of Clayton Keller, who is one of my favorite players. He's small and light, but if you watch him play, it's not like he plays scared. He just knows how to position himself, and as messy as the Coyotes were, they usually did a good job of complimenting Keller's skills with linemates who had more of that size to work with. And tbh too much size can be a detriment, it's hard to learn to skate when you get past 6'5, it can be difficult to move effectively. It's why Silayev was such an enticing prospect for a lot of teams this draft (even if imo he doesnt have the skill), it's why Matt Rempe got pushed to be an enforcer.
I actually think that Chara is one of those exceptional big players that would have actually been better at his sport had he been a few inches shorter...
@@CanoeToNewOrleans You're telling me Yzerman, Sakic, Crosby, Toews gave their teammates less confidence because they weren't a head taller than their opponents... Napoleon is an extreme threat for your state of mind, my overly simplistic friend...
@@v4v819 Without question. The Bruins played with more swagger and physicality when they had Chara. When the biggest guy in the league is on your team, you feel like you can get away with more because he'll back you up. All Stevie Y, Crosby, Sakic and Toews can do is score points. They can't kick ass.
Without small players the game would get stale really fast. Little guys disadvantage forces them to find new ways to play and keep the game interesting.
This is what i like about hockey and its so different compared to other sports, where you might just need to be tall or big and bulky or lean. there is balance of skill and toughness in hockey and i feel like it gives players options on what style they play, And there is nothing better than someone lining up a big and getting dangled or vise versa
It’s rarely the most important thing but if you’re picking between 2 roughly equal players, one is 5’11 and the other is 6’3 you’re taking the bigger guy
like most things, if you have abnormal talent, size can be overcome. but like anything, you slap a 6'8 guy against a 5'6 and the small guy loses almost everything if they have the exact same skill and brains. I am 6'2 and a dutch beanpole no matter what i do,. I wanted to be a TE in football but was always a WR because of speed jumping and height, but most of all, I just could not physically withstand another guy play after play who was an extra 45 to 60 pounds slamming into me the same way linemen can, or a guy who is 6'2 210 vs me at 6'2 165 on a heavy day, even with competitive bench numbers ext. we are all different, but hey, that is a fun part of being human
i'm a tampa guy but am rooting for stankoven (DAL) at 5ft8 to win RoY in 2025. heart of a lion, and is willing to step to the big moment when called upon. 🔥
I think PLD proves another reason why size is so desirable. When it comes to trading, losses can be recouped easier if the player, while horrible, has size. Last point: during the golden age of the NJ Devils, they had Scott Stevens 6'0 Scott Niedermayer 6'0 Ken Daneyko 6'0 Brian Rafalski 5'10
Size does matter but it's just one factor. Bedard wasn't just small, he had other weaknesses and is injury prone. Crosby was also earlier in his career, but no one thinks 5'11 200lb is too small to play in the NHL.
The game has changed very recently to protect players from needless hits and harassment with hooking not being allowed anymore. It's more of a skill game where you are actually meant to play hockey instead of just brutalize the opponents best player. When skill can be expressed then it favors the smaller players with less mass being more accurate and faster. NBA is the best demonstration of how mass decreases accuracy. But in hockey being smaller really means being 5'11". Don't get much benefit from being smaller than that. Weight matters when there's elevation but as hockey is played on a completely flat surface both length and power are more important for speed. Bedard is pretty much as small as you can be without starting to suffer from it. At 5'5" I would guess that makes you slower. Would be fine for a climber in cycling or some sport where you directly benefit from less weight. But in hockey you have less reach, shorter stride and you really suffer in a large part of the game when battling for puck. It's not that you can replace size with skill but the other way around. Size can account for a lack of skill. You have very few small players who are average but you have a lot of big players who are. For goalies it's a much more obvious situation where simply being bigger makes it easier to block shots. But once you go basketball big you become too cumbersome to move fast and get into those awkward positions.. Like for 7 footers joints are a problem.
What you say is true during regular season, but playoffs go on a different standard. Size does matter. Quinn Heghes was rocked in the playoffs this year and near the end he was dumping the puck fast to avoid being hit by the bigger forwards. Which is why I feel Canucks are going big on all the other D'men. Small players can get you to the playoffs, but won't win you the cup.
Don’t forget Patty Kane. Should have been mentioned as a MVP player in his prime. Also I would be interested to see career length for the smaller guys.
Watching Kariya and St. Louis play in the day of murderous open ice hits, magical to watch. Although Kariya getting demolished by Steven’s was hard to watch
A good example to see both sides of the story is the avs defensemen. They’re a small group but defend extremely well, and because they’re so mobile they can transition and go offensive so well. The bad side is they lack the physicality. It’s not like they don’t play physically and don’t hit, but sometimes it’s tough to seperate the puck from the body, win a board battle, and clear out the front of the net. Luckily they’re all so good positionally, and are such a good possession and transition team, that it doesn’t really matter.
I think being a standard size is best, not too big where you stand out, but not too small where you’re knocked all over. Most of the greats, including Wayne Gretzky, Connor McDavid, Sidney Crosby are all pretty normal in size (5’10-5’11). It allows for good body control, swiftness and ability to still defend yourself.
What's with the trend in north America to exaggerate people's sizes? They do it in hockey too (like saying Hedman is 6'7). And im pretty sure Bobrovsky was previously listed at 6'1 and now all of a sudden he's 6'2.
Seeing dudes like St Louis, Sullivan, and now Bedard makes me sure the bias against small players has always been dumb. I'm a bit biased since I have a relative who played well in the league just below the CHL and despite lighting it up in the season he could have been drafted to the CHL, he was told to his face that he was too small. Apparently leading scoring and having solid two way play isn't enough
Without watching the whole video, I'd say smaller size doesn't stop you from playing if you have the talent, but being taller it certainly helps with the physical part of the game (as long as you stay quick and agile)
Conner mcdavid is a spitting image of what happens when you do everything right, the way he can process a play happening in mer seconds is the result of of his ability too read off everyone this has nothing too do with his height and everything too do with the way he plays sees the game it’s one thing too witness it on tv but irl it’s something too beautiful truly
I agree that most of what makes him good has nothing to do with his height. But if he were shorter I suspect he would be slightly slower on top speed. You could maybe argue he would have better agility, but Mcdavid is already insanely good at changing directions.
Depends on your role and style of play. Body mechanics is more important. Some people just move and look as if they are not "comfortable" performing in their body.
Yeah, size never becomes "just another number." It always matters - but it's never the only thing that matters. Trying to suggest otherwise is just silly. Two players who are otherwise identical in skill and speed, the guy who has 2 inches and 10 lbs on the other is going to have the edge. Period. But along with size, you have to consider speed, agility, awareness, creativity, toughness, etc etc etc. This is like asking "does footspeed matter?" Damn straight it does - but a guy who can park himself in front of the net, take punishment from the defensemen, distract the goalie, and tip the puck like a wizard is still going to find a place on a team even if he has slow feet.
Size definitely comes in handy during the postseason. When you’re in a very physical and grueling series, having a big, fast and nasty team will pay off dividends as the series progresses and wearing down your opponent. That adage is correct though. Scouts always love big players. Especially if said big players have the skating ability and hands to complement their size. Whereas smaller players have to be that much better than every other player their size to draw interest.
You can’t think an 18 year old at 5’10” is going to be his final size. Men have a final growth spurt after 18yo. I put on almost 1.5” between 19-21yo. I was always tall, I got even taller from Hight School to 21, and the biggest jump was around 20. I remember getting even more clumsy than usual at one point, and didn’t realize the cause until a checkup at the Dr. I thought I was done, but boom, another inch, and over the next year another 3/8”. I wouldn’t be surprised if Beds ends up close to 6’.
As a goalie measured.at 179cm. Im often mentioned to be too small to be a great goalie but my hockey iq and skating ability made me an outlier that my beer league goalie rival struggled to keep up with me. Ended up playing moslty lob sided games cause i would occasionally be unbeatable when i read and move like a champ.
Growing up in the 90s, A 6'2" goalie was seen as pretty big, with lots of very good goalies who were 5'8"-5'10". Now I see a 6 foot Dustin Wolf and he looks tiny in the net.
It's the composite stick... A real game changer that makes everyone's shot as fast and deceptive as the top 2 snipers of the league back in the day... Also allows for more shot selection because you can let off a lightning fast snap shot with the speed near the slapshot but the accuracy of a wrister... And players are so good at shooting off their off-leg and disguising their shot as well as dangling plus moving the shot placement point on the fly that there's almost no time for anticipation for the goaltender and a wrister can get near 100 miles an hour- faster than what the human eye can detect... You need a super sound technical game with your angles nailed now to have a chance and a big body essential because even small cracks bring the wall down with most top goal scorers these days... Having said all that... I still think Brett had the best one-timer of all time with that wooden stick and his fluid motion and perfect Technique... No one could track the goaltender's shifting weight from one foot to another like Brett! Most his goals were low- like most goals in history in the league- and he would always react to the goaltender and shoot it contrary to his position and reaction and direction of movement...
About goalie size during the cup final, it's a big disingenuous to say only 1 in so many years has appeared as there's like 2-3 in the whole NHL each season. On the top of my head, there's like Sarros, Wolf, and Halak. A short goalie won't be picked, so the saying a short goalie can't do it just go around, but they aren't given a fair shake. Just look at Nathan Darveau in the Q. He's a 5'08" goalie that has been top 5 in SV% last couple of years, still undrafted. He's too small. But his younger teammate, Gabriel D'Aigle, 6'04", is being touted as the next MAF, but his SV% is worlds apart from Darveau. But he's big.
When Montreal had Larry Robison and Craig Ludwig that was huge. Pronger and his I'll say kids using angles was a thing. Hatcher was a guy that would hurt you really bad, and was an elite at his time. Boy this is a tough idea to think about. Would I want a Prime Makar or Prime Chara....
For an individual player it doesnt really matter, however to build a cup winning team you have to have good size all over the roster. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas and Florida all had big rosters
If you play or coach a team sport, you understand the importance of body position, and angles. What you are calling, "IQ". Much, much more important than size. Even in rebounding a basketball, size is the last thing. Body position, staying low, timing and angle of attack will embarrass a big man in the paint. Dennis "The Worm" Rodman is the apex of this skill.
I don't think height matters much in hockey, but height to weight ratio is important. Most S&C coaches have players doing useless balance drills (and other silly plyometric/body weight exercises) that take away from time they could be spending getting bigger and stronger. There are sadly still coaches in the league that believe their players will become 'musclebound' if they focus too much on weight training. McDavid should be weighing in around 215; guys like adam fox should be ~200lbs. I'd argue most of the league's players are undersized.
Unfortunately for the little guys like St. Louis and Fleury, the big guys have learned to actually learned to play hockey over the years and an average big guy will provide the team with more value than an above average little guy in the long run. Obviously there are other factors like work ethic and 'heart', but none of that has anything to do with the argument itself.
Size is one thing that matters. Skating ability, or maneuverability, is another thing that matters. Cognitive talent, and especially cognitive processing speed and visual-spatial awareness, also matters. Straight up (physical) speed matters. And attitude, work ethic, and receptiveness to coaching & feedback matter. So, yes, size matters, but it’s only one of several important criteria.
As a Devils fan the average height for d men makes me feel a lot better about the size of Hughes and Nemec. I’ve heard chatter about Nemec being small but I never really bought into it.
Surprised you didn’t mention Patrick Kane. People were surprised the Hawks were using their #1 pick on a player that small and we know how that worked out. 😊 The Hawks then went on to draft Debrincat who had fallen to the 2nd round in his draft when he should have easily been taken in the first.
The average man is 5'9". The average player is 6'1". That means that a much lower percentage of people make up for the majority of NHLers. It's a huge advantage.
Thank you! I thought I was the only person that found it annoying. It's not just used in hockey, and it's born from typical "lazy-speak". Too lazy to say "competitiveness". It's stupid and needs to go away.
@@joelniemann9547 Funny. I tend towards being a Grammar National Socialist and hearing that usage of ‘compete’ had me feeling ill at ease. Was hoping it was restricted to hockey.
![[TH] 2024 PMWC x EWC Main Tournament Day 1 | PUBG MOBILE WORLD CUP x ESPORTS WORLD CUP](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f5Coja1zCzo/mqdefault.jpg)
As a coach, I don't care how big you are, I care how big you play. But it's easier to play big if you are big.
I found historically the toughest players are often among the smallest in the league... Tie Domi is a prime example- not a bad hockey player also!
@@v4v819 I think it's because it's a lot harder to excel as a smaller player similar to basketball. Which is why in order to do so you must come up with unique ways to differentiate yourself from the rest.
@@AdamOBrien-e4p I dig your theory! I think if smaller kids was encouraged to see it as a challenge not a handicap then there would be more great players given what your theory reveals about what makes a great player great compared to great talent without a need to better himself...
@v4v819 definitely!
Coping is nice, but size does matter and smaller guys have to make up for it
Marty st. Louis got me into this sport
SO glad he's the Habs, my favorite team's coach. Loved him as a player. Hope he stays a while.
One of the best players Calgary let get away, in our extensive list of greats we let slip through our fingers.
How so? Like a father figure? Showed you the ropes and what not?
@@dr.loomis4221 appearing to me in a dream
yes was fortunate to have watched him throughout elementary and middle school
as a kings fan, i always looked at the difference between Blake Lizotte and PLD. Lizotte is listed at 5’9 although he looks way smaller (i’d say like 5’7). Lizzo is an absolute hound, constantly forchecking, back checking, stick checking, body checking. whereas PLD just looks lazy out there and doesn’t have a care in the world. i always thought that if PLD had Lizzo’s mentality, he would be an absolute superstar. but there’s a reason Lizotte is built like this, because he had to be.
Somewhat related to how Lindros never had to learn to skate with his head up prior to getting to the NHL. He never had to.
As an Avs and Habs fan,Lehkonen is the exact same way. He's an absolute pit bull on the forecheck even though he's 5'10 175
The same Lizotte that kept getting pushed around by the Oilers? Lol he stinks
@@Tombauer97 losers, haha, choked again. All summer long and forever. s0ilers choked when it counted.
If LA wanted to practice their penalty kill, put PLD out there for a shift. If they needed a power play, put Blake out there…
Im really sad no one mentions Nathan grebe he was so underrated for a little guy dude he had hands and grit at freaking 5,4!
Or andrew shaw
Best dwarf in NHL history
He had a big pee pee though...
For their wifes it does
Prolly not when you bringing home millions 😂
Wth is wrong with you
Only the size of the bank
@@eliyahumachlis7516 I identify as funny
My pronouns are hehe
@dariusk7686 lmao. Take this up vote, you badass.
Brad Marchand, Martin St Louis, Theoren Fleury, Nathan Gerbe, Alex DeBrincat, Patrick Kane, Cole Caufield, Artemi Panarin, Kirill Kaprizov, etc... I'm sure Im forgetting some players but there are tons of high scoring NHLers who have proven that you can get by in the Show being under 6'
Daniel Briere.
Some of the greatist hockey players all time were not big guys!
Mike Peca
It's easier to get lost in the mix, so to say as a smaller player too.
Yamamoto?
Can you do a tallest and smallest teams video?
Second this
3rd this
4th this
Anyone got any initial thoughts on the top 5 tallest teams. He mentioned the bruins and Panthers, but the entire Blackhawks defense is 6'2+. Heck Alex Vlasic is 6'7"
I think it would be cool to talk about how the size has changed over the years too. Are teams getting smaller?
I am lacking words to tell you how good that video is. Now days 90% of videos and article are lacking relevant information and correlation between statements. What you just did is captivating, informative and is applicable to the past and future of hockey. Thank you very much for that!
PS: there is one thing I will say about the part where you talk about McDavid's speed and how other players can match his speed. I truly don't believe anyone can match his speed with the puck. Without it you are correct, but no player skates like him with the puck.
Once I did a calculation of how many players in the top 100 scorers of all time (and playoff scorers) were at or below current NHL average (6'0, 200lbs). 46% of all time point scorers were below that (including critically, Gretzky) and 43% of all time playoff scorers. So sure, having some size benefits players, but clearly its infinitely more about HOW you play vs how tall you are.
But how many of them are 5’10-5’11. Most people who have played know those 2 inches don’t mean much once you’re on the rink.
The average height of an North American man is 5'9, considering in the last draft 3 players below 5'10 were drafted, I'm going to assume that being big in hockey is the answer.
In the old days men in general were much smaller so you must refine your data to take this into consideration.
It's incredibly rare to have the kind of talent the top 100 scorers all time have though. Size doesn't matter for them because they have extremely high-level skill that separates them from everyone else. To see if size matters you have to look at third/fourth-liners or second/third-pair defensemen, because their skill level is closer to the "average" of the league and thus isn't something that can separate them from the rest of the players.
@@sophiewang1025 Totally agree. Size matters, but I think it doesn't matter as much as some people believe. There probably is a little bit of selection bias where coaches prefer bigger players and penalize smaller players leading to less opportunities and game time. With that said being bigger for sure is optimally selected for otherwise more statistically short players (sub 5'9) would be in the league.
Size makes it way easier for a player, a smaller person is gonna have to work much harder, but can still succeed in this league.
Regular season but not in the playoffs.
@@MrBallzyplayoffs is when you really notice how much height can affect a player. especially defenseman
@@mithex8414 absolutely 👍
@@MrBallzyapparently not marchessault lmao
If you're under 6 feet then you can't help your team get deep in the playoffs but you can become an all star in the regular season on your frazzle dazzle but you're be injured or rag dolled in the playoffs and the wear and tear at the size will break you before the second round begins...
In that clip of Saros you can actually see him set his left skate in anticipation of pushing off to his right…. man, I really appreciate your vids thanks!🎉
Truly the best hockey videos on YT. Well done. Every time
There are small players that play big and big players that play small. Comparatively small 6’0” Demitri Kulikov plowed 6’8” Matt Rempe like s pile of snow, while Ryan Lomberg, who no matter what metrics say cannot be taller than 5’8” because im taller than him, never gets pushed around.
This is one of the more fascinating aspects of the game to me. It seems like a mix of size vs speed is always best. As a Devils fan, we used to be known as a VERY physical team back in the day. The new focus on speed and skill got us Jack and Luke, Bratt, Hischier, but that was a clear problem last year when teams made a point of physically steamrolling us. Fitzgerald went and got McDermid ... because he had to, and then there was a clear focus on getting bigger and more physical players this offseason. I hope the balance is right now.
Had to pause the video just to admire John MacLean in that red and green Devils sweater with the red bucket. Art.
Love how you showed Makars poke check against McDavid in the playoffs. Him and Towes put on a masterclass against McDavid and Drai in the playoffs. It’s a thing of beauty
And yet both of them still scored on him😂. Forsling and ekblad did a better job specially forsling
That wcf was the only time I've seen McDavid suprised and thrown off by someone else's speed. That Avs speed completely neutralized his greatest strength.
@@RIPJimmyA7X yet we still got 7 points.. he js had no defense or depth and goaltending
@@Markymark-gg6qf They did nothing special. McDavid doesn’t look like McDavid against the Avs, sorry bud. Ive seen no pair do better against Drai and McDavid in the playoffs than Towes and Makar, not sure what to tell ya. The times I’ve seen them play against one another in the playoffs Drai and McDavid were also on the same line. Not sure why you’re so triggered lol
@@Markymark-gg6qf Also don’t be a loser bro, stop saying “we” did anything. You didn’t do sht, they don’t know who you are lol
love this style of video so much. hope to see more of it even during the season
Glad to see you have a balanced take on this. There's no better time to be a smaller player in the NHL, but it's still a game played on ice. If weight (not to mention reach) didn't matter on ice, curlers wouldn't obsess over stone weight. Yes a player is mobile and can change direction very quickly these days, but when there is contact, suddenly weight matters a lot on the ice. Posture and speed can help a tough small player overcome some of this effect, but there are also guys out there who have speed, skill, *and* size.
Bro said Hedman was 6’7” then 3 minutes later 6’6”😂😂
Nice analysis with the tendys in this video -- I am a goalie myself and would love to see more of your commentary on the intricacies of the position.
Your videos are awesome man, never played but enjoy following the sport and you’re teaching me so much
Size plus skill plus speed plus brains: Barkov.
What about Theo Fleury at 5’6” and Nathan Gerbe at 5’5” both brilliant players. It’s not all about being big, but you’re right that small players always get discarded as not good enough, but I’ve met enough smaller players over the years that could’ve matched many in the NHL in their day
I love your videos, if you could get to it, I'd very much appreciate it as a Devils fan a deep-dive into why they failed this past season after a record-setting campaign and after making some offseason additions whether or not they can actually become legit contenders.
Size make a huge difference in playoffs... a lot of those undersized players get wrecked during the playoffs
Amazing deep dive, as always.
I’m a 6’2” goalie 🎉
I grew up late, growing from 5’8” to 6’2” in close to a year, and really noticed the benefits when i reached my full size.
You say Bedard Should take lessons from Gretzky when it comes to avoiding being hit. I agree, but he should also look at the guy who Gretzky looked at and learned from when he was 15 years old; Bobby Clarke. Clarke found ways to avoid but also deal with it when he had to. Look at him, it's amazing that he was part of the 1970's Flyers team and not only survived but thrived. That alone puts him up there as one of the greats in my book.
Patrick Kane used to and probably still does reach out to these guys for tips on not getting hit. Connor Bedard CAN'T get hit. Period. And dealing it out is all timing. But at the end of the day you have to maul other teams, you can't have 5 Connor Bedards (IMHO).
@@malcolmapplet4313 (see team canada)
After the 05 lockout, guys who could skate and make plays were put on a pedestal as the game became more about the ability to possess the puck and generate opportunities. Smaller guys all of a sudden had an advantage. Now the bigger guys have adjusted their games to be much better skaters than big guys were 15 years ago so the edge smaller guys had is now becoming extinct, IMO.
I think the lanky ectomorph build will be taking over the game soon. Like you said, tall and lanky enough to protect pucks, slender enough to skate w speed and agility but yet a project able frame for strength.
Hellebuyck just won the Vezina…he is 6’4 and 207 lbs so size for sure helps in net
He shouldn’t have won it
@@Faygo_ZeR0naw Hellebuyck was by far the best goalie this year, only person close was demko but he was hurt for to long to give him a real chance
That's a little different but I will say there are great goalies just under 6 ft
He didn’t get out of the first round, though.
@@TheWastedLight bro had like a 860 and a 5.66 in the playoffs 💀💀💀💀
Wicked video! Thanks
excellent video thanks!
I would like to see a similar video on Theo Flurey and Cliff Roning and their success and others in that era
Yeah Cliff Ronning was incredible
I wonder how Bedard would do with wood sticks? As an Oilers fan totally agree with your views on Skinner, down way too soon. I think goalies would be more successful if they learned how to poke check. Rare to see now. Great video.
I also always think of Clayton Keller, who is one of my favorite players. He's small and light, but if you watch him play, it's not like he plays scared. He just knows how to position himself, and as messy as the Coyotes were, they usually did a good job of complimenting Keller's skills with linemates who had more of that size to work with.
And tbh too much size can be a detriment, it's hard to learn to skate when you get past 6'5, it can be difficult to move effectively. It's why Silayev was such an enticing prospect for a lot of teams this draft (even if imo he doesnt have the skill), it's why Matt Rempe got pushed to be an enforcer.
Zedno's height mattered little except for one thing: his stick, he had massive reach.
and his slapshot
I actually think that Chara is one of those exceptional big players that would have actually been better at his sport had he been a few inches shorter...
and the confidence it gave his teammates.
@@CanoeToNewOrleans You're telling me Yzerman, Sakic, Crosby, Toews gave their teammates less confidence because they weren't a head taller than their opponents... Napoleon is an extreme threat for your state of mind, my overly simplistic friend...
@@v4v819 Without question. The Bruins played with more swagger and physicality when they had Chara. When the biggest guy in the league is on your team, you feel like you can get away with more because he'll back you up. All Stevie Y, Crosby, Sakic and Toews can do is score points. They can't kick ass.
"Size matters not...look at me... judge me by my size do you?"
-Master Yoda
Size in today's NHL, or lack thereof, won't prevent you from scoring goals or points. But lack of size is a big detriment in playoff-style hockey.
Without small players the game would get stale really fast.
Little guys disadvantage forces them to find new ways to play and keep the game interesting.
This is what i like about hockey and its so different compared to other sports, where you might just need to be tall or big and bulky or lean. there is balance of skill and toughness in hockey and i feel like it gives players options on what style they play, And there is nothing better than someone lining up a big and getting dangled or vise versa
Breaking news: The rangers didnt make it to the cup finals because Shesterkin was too short
What kind of logic is this
@@tomcooks2562 it's called a joke
>>> awww!.....no!
It was because their pp went cold
Shortskin, _feelsbadman._
It always matters unless you have the speed and the skill
It’s rarely the most important thing but if you’re picking between 2 roughly equal players, one is 5’11 and the other is 6’3 you’re taking the bigger guy
like most things, if you have abnormal talent, size can be overcome. but like anything, you slap a 6'8 guy against a 5'6 and the small guy loses almost everything if they have the exact same skill and brains.
I am 6'2 and a dutch beanpole no matter what i do,. I wanted to be a TE in football but was always a WR because of speed jumping and height, but most of all, I just could not physically withstand another guy play after play who was an extra 45 to 60 pounds slamming into me the same way linemen can, or a guy who is 6'2 210 vs me at 6'2 165 on a heavy day, even with competitive bench numbers ext.
we are all different, but hey, that is a fun part of being human
For some reason Cale Makar seems much taller to me than Quinn Hughes. Crazy there is only 1 inch height difference between them.
Obviously quinn isn’t 5’10😂😂 probably like 5’8
@@Markymark-gg6qf5'10 is a joke ...I thought...at first.
i'm a tampa guy but am rooting for stankoven (DAL) at 5ft8 to win RoY in 2025. heart of a lion, and is willing to step to the big moment when called upon. 🔥
I think PLD proves another reason why size is so desirable. When it comes to trading, losses can be recouped easier if the player, while horrible, has size.
Last point: during the golden age of the NJ Devils, they had
Scott Stevens 6'0
Scott Niedermayer 6'0
Ken Daneyko 6'0
Brian Rafalski 5'10
Size does matter but it's just one factor. Bedard wasn't just small, he had other weaknesses and is injury prone. Crosby was also earlier in his career, but no one thinks 5'11 200lb is too small to play in the NHL.
The game has changed very recently to protect players from needless hits and harassment with hooking not being allowed anymore. It's more of a skill game where you are actually meant to play hockey instead of just brutalize the opponents best player. When skill can be expressed then it favors the smaller players with less mass being more accurate and faster. NBA is the best demonstration of how mass decreases accuracy. But in hockey being smaller really means being 5'11". Don't get much benefit from being smaller than that. Weight matters when there's elevation but as hockey is played on a completely flat surface both length and power are more important for speed. Bedard is pretty much as small as you can be without starting to suffer from it. At 5'5" I would guess that makes you slower. Would be fine for a climber in cycling or some sport where you directly benefit from less weight. But in hockey you have less reach, shorter stride and you really suffer in a large part of the game when battling for puck.
It's not that you can replace size with skill but the other way around. Size can account for a lack of skill. You have very few small players who are average but you have a lot of big players who are.
For goalies it's a much more obvious situation where simply being bigger makes it easier to block shots. But once you go basketball big you become too cumbersome to move fast and get into those awkward positions.. Like for 7 footers joints are a problem.
A huge factor as to why Nashville lost in the first round was saros’ inability to cover the top of the net and see over screens.
What you say is true during regular season, but playoffs go on a different standard. Size does matter. Quinn Heghes was rocked in the playoffs this year and near the end he was dumping the puck fast to avoid being hit by the bigger forwards. Which is why I feel Canucks are going big on all the other D'men. Small players can get you to the playoffs, but won't win you the cup.
Ya know, except that 5’ 9” guy who won the Conn Smythe last season
@@alexbuffaloboy and Vegas let him walk when his contract was up.
Don’t forget Patty Kane. Should have been mentioned as a MVP player in his prime. Also I would be interested to see career length for the smaller guys.
Watching Kariya and St. Louis play in the day of murderous open ice hits, magical to watch. Although Kariya getting demolished by Steven’s was hard to watch
Fantastic video
Great video!
A good example to see both sides of the story is the avs defensemen. They’re a small group but defend extremely well, and because they’re so mobile they can transition and go offensive so well. The bad side is they lack the physicality. It’s not like they don’t play physically and don’t hit, but sometimes it’s tough to seperate the puck from the body, win a board battle, and clear out the front of the net. Luckily they’re all so good positionally, and are such a good possession and transition team, that it doesn’t really matter.
I always remember hearing that a taller goalie was slow, he couldn’t move across the crease as fast. I never believed it
Would love to see the correlation between size and injury rates and types
When you watch Kane, he avoids almost all contact because of his positioning and ability to move the puck. His lack of size never mattered.
Thats like me asking that question. So weird when people try to answer questions they arent trained to answer😊
“Tall and strong defenseman” shows lil ol’ mcavoy
this channel is excellent for us hockey nuts
I think being a standard size is best, not too big where you stand out, but not too small where you’re knocked all over. Most of the greats, including Wayne Gretzky, Connor McDavid, Sidney Crosby are all pretty normal in size (5’10-5’11). It allows for good body control, swiftness and ability to still defend yourself.
It’s ok to have a couple small forward’s.
What's with the trend in north America to exaggerate people's sizes? They do it in hockey too (like saying Hedman is 6'7).
And im pretty sure Bobrovsky was previously listed at 6'1 and now all of a sudden he's 6'2.
Seeing dudes like St Louis, Sullivan, and now Bedard makes me sure the bias against small players has always been dumb. I'm a bit biased since I have a relative who played well in the league just below the CHL and despite lighting it up in the season he could have been drafted to the CHL, he was told to his face that he was too small. Apparently leading scoring and having solid two way play isn't enough
Can't wait to see Hutson in the future
Its fun to see Marty St Louis next to Zdeno Chara lol
Without watching the whole video, I'd say smaller size doesn't stop you from playing if you have the talent, but being taller it certainly helps with the physical part of the game (as long as you stay quick and agile)
Size used to matter in the Nhl but nowadays you aren´t allowed to really hit the star players so it doesn´t matter so much anymore.
Conner mcdavid is a spitting image of what happens when you do everything right, the way he can process a play happening in mer seconds is the result of of his ability too read off everyone this has nothing too do with his height and everything too do with the way he plays sees the game it’s one thing too witness it on tv but irl it’s something too beautiful truly
*to
I agree that most of what makes him good has nothing to do with his height.
But if he were shorter I suspect he would be slightly slower on top speed. You could maybe argue he would have better agility, but Mcdavid is already insanely good at changing directions.
Depends on your role and style of play. Body mechanics is more important. Some people just move and look as if they are not "comfortable" performing in their body.
I legit had no idea Marchessault was 5'9, he doesn't play like it.
Yeah, size never becomes "just another number." It always matters - but it's never the only thing that matters. Trying to suggest otherwise is just silly. Two players who are otherwise identical in skill and speed, the guy who has 2 inches and 10 lbs on the other is going to have the edge. Period. But along with size, you have to consider speed, agility, awareness, creativity, toughness, etc etc etc. This is like asking "does footspeed matter?" Damn straight it does - but a guy who can park himself in front of the net, take punishment from the defensemen, distract the goalie, and tip the puck like a wizard is still going to find a place on a team even if he has slow feet.
Size definitely comes in handy during the postseason. When you’re in a very physical and grueling series, having a big, fast and nasty team will pay off dividends as the series progresses and wearing down your opponent.
That adage is correct though. Scouts always love big players. Especially if said big players have the skating ability and hands to complement their size. Whereas smaller players have to be that much better than every other player their size to draw interest.
You can’t think an 18 year old at 5’10” is going to be his final size. Men have a final growth spurt after 18yo. I put on almost 1.5” between 19-21yo. I was always tall, I got even taller from Hight School to 21, and the biggest jump was around 20. I remember getting even more clumsy than usual at one point, and didn’t realize the cause until a checkup at the Dr. I thought I was done, but boom, another inch, and over the next year another 3/8”. I wouldn’t be surprised if Beds ends up close to 6’.
Anyone in the metric system world constantly googling those height measurements converted into cm like me? :D
As a goalie measured.at 179cm. Im often mentioned to be too small to be a great goalie but my hockey iq and skating ability made me an outlier that my beer league goalie rival struggled to keep up with me. Ended up playing moslty lob sided games cause i would occasionally be unbeatable when i read and move like a champ.
Growing up in the 90s, A 6'2" goalie was seen as pretty big, with lots of very good goalies who were 5'8"-5'10". Now I see a 6 foot Dustin Wolf and he looks tiny in the net.
It's the composite stick... A real game changer that makes everyone's shot as fast and deceptive as the top 2 snipers of the league back in the day... Also allows for more shot selection because you can let off a lightning fast snap shot with the speed near the slapshot but the accuracy of a wrister... And players are so good at shooting off their off-leg and disguising their shot as well as dangling plus moving the shot placement point on the fly that there's almost no time for anticipation for the goaltender and a wrister can get near 100 miles an hour- faster than what the human eye can detect... You need a super sound technical game with your angles nailed now to have a chance and a big body essential because even small cracks bring the wall down with most top goal scorers these days...
Having said all that... I still think Brett had the best one-timer of all time with that wooden stick and his fluid motion and perfect Technique... No one could track the goaltender's shifting weight from one foot to another like Brett! Most his goals were low- like most goals in history in the league- and he would always react to the goaltender and shoot it contrary to his position and reaction and direction of movement...
I like how Hedman shrunk during the video.
About goalie size during the cup final, it's a big disingenuous to say only 1 in so many years has appeared as there's like 2-3 in the whole NHL each season. On the top of my head, there's like Sarros, Wolf, and Halak.
A short goalie won't be picked, so the saying a short goalie can't do it just go around, but they aren't given a fair shake. Just look at Nathan Darveau in the Q. He's a 5'08" goalie that has been top 5 in SV% last couple of years, still undrafted. He's too small. But his younger teammate, Gabriel D'Aigle, 6'04", is being touted as the next MAF, but his SV% is worlds apart from Darveau. But he's big.
"Probably a small hockey player"
Perfect
When Montreal had Larry Robison and Craig Ludwig that was huge.
Pronger and his I'll say kids using angles was a thing.
Hatcher was a guy that would hurt you really bad, and was an elite at his time.
Boy this is a tough idea to think about. Would I want a Prime Makar or Prime Chara....
The game has changed so much, this is difficult. Now if you had a Lindros or a Mario next year, it would ripple and change the game.
For an individual player it doesnt really matter, however to build a cup winning team you have to have good size all over the roster. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas and Florida all had big rosters
Anyone remember Dennis Savard ? I used to love his patented spin-a-ramas back in the day ❤
If you play or coach a team sport, you understand the importance of body position, and angles. What you are calling, "IQ". Much, much more important than size. Even in rebounding a basketball, size is the last thing. Body position, staying low, timing and angle of attack will embarrass a big man in the paint. Dennis "The Worm" Rodman is the apex of this skill.
I don't think height matters much in hockey, but height to weight ratio is important. Most S&C coaches have players doing useless balance drills (and other silly plyometric/body weight exercises) that take away from time they could be spending getting bigger and stronger. There are sadly still coaches in the league that believe their players will become 'musclebound' if they focus too much on weight training. McDavid should be weighing in around 215; guys like adam fox should be ~200lbs. I'd argue most of the league's players are undersized.
Unfortunately for the little guys like St. Louis and Fleury, the big guys have learned to actually learned to play hockey over the years and an average big guy will provide the team with more value than an above average little guy in the long run.
Obviously there are other factors like work ethic and 'heart', but none of that has anything to do with the argument itself.
Babe wake up, new hockey psychology video just dropped
Size is one thing that matters. Skating ability, or maneuverability, is another thing that matters. Cognitive talent, and especially cognitive processing speed and visual-spatial awareness, also matters. Straight up (physical) speed matters. And attitude, work ethic, and receptiveness to coaching & feedback matter.
So, yes, size matters, but it’s only one of several important criteria.
It's not how big you are, it's how big you play. Grit comes in all sizes and if you don't have it you'll be often injured.
3:03 Ironic you mention Skinner I food not trust him for the Oilers. I feel like they should of been in on that Ullmark trade
As a Devils fan the average height for d men makes me feel a lot better about the size of Hughes and Nemec. I’ve heard chatter about Nemec being small but I never really bought into it.
Marchessault listed at 183 lbs, by the Stanley Cup Final he may have been as light as 175 lbs. Don't think he was shorter than 5'9", though.
Just feels good having a great defenseman on our Canucks man.
Gretzky; the goat, himself
Surprised you didn’t mention Patrick Kane. People were surprised the Hawks were using their #1 pick on a player that small and we know how that worked out. 😊 The Hawks then went on to draft Debrincat who had fallen to the 2nd round in his draft when he should have easily been taken in the first.
Cause we won 3 cups on chip and chase.
The average man is 5'9". The average player is 6'1". That means that a much lower percentage of people make up for the majority of NHLers. It's a huge advantage.
Serious question: is “his compete” the same as “his competitiveness”? Is that a Canadian way of saying that? Never heard ‘compete’ used that way.
Yes, it’s a part of the hockey lexicon. The language of hockey has been one of my favourite things about following it
@@nicolasderuiter1699 interesting. Appreciate your response.
Thank you! I thought I was the only person that found it annoying. It's not just used in hockey, and it's born from typical "lazy-speak". Too lazy to say "competitiveness". It's stupid and needs to go away.
@@joelniemann9547 Funny. I tend towards being a Grammar National Socialist and hearing that usage of ‘compete’ had me feeling ill at ease. Was hoping it was restricted to hockey.
Would it be safe to take off 1-2” off all these heights? Being that they’re most likely all inflated a bit