The Oshkosh JLTV is More Powerful Than You Think

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มี.ค. 2023
  • The Oshkosh Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) is an advanced tactical vehicle developed by the Oshkosh Corporation for the United States military. It is designed to replace the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), also known as the Humvee, which has been in service for several decades. The JLTV offers significant improvements in terms of performance, protection, and payload capacity compared to the Humvee.
    💯💯ACROSS MEDIA PRODUCT
    Across Media is Independent channel. All profits from this shirt go to the team and content improvements.
    👕👕 Across Media T-Shirt
    acrossmedia.creator-spring.co...
    🪖🪖 Special Hats
    acrossmedia.creator-spring.co...
    🎩🎩Bucket Hat
    acrossmedia.creator-spring.co...
    🧥🧥Classic Pullover Hoodie
    acrossmedia.creator-spring.co...

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @drewhertzfeld3100
    @drewhertzfeld3100 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    But they forgot to design some way to secure the front of that turret...

    • @drkriegkorps294
      @drkriegkorps294 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It's supposed to swing like that so the gunner can cover is firing arc without needing to turn the whole turret.

    • @RABBIT_VR1
      @RABBIT_VR1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@drkriegkorps294Ik but when turned you could take shrapnel or rounds through the side that stays uncovered

    • @Rich-fr2yv
      @Rich-fr2yv หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@RABBIT_VR1It isn't a tank. Too much armor that high up will raise the center of gravity

  • @dannylance5212
    @dannylance5212 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    One of the reasons why I love living in Oshkosh WI.

    • @huckleberryred472
      @huckleberryred472 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why ? What benefit does it give you other than you acting like a ham sandwich 🥪 when you say Duurrrr: I wiv where they tighten bolts 🔩

    • @EricTheActor805
      @EricTheActor805 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @dannylance5212
      @dannylance5212 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@EricTheActor805 Also my job makes steel plating for the military vehicles too. My work can be found on many of vehicles.

    • @EricTheActor805
      @EricTheActor805 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dannylance5212
      Huge waste of tax money

    • @dannylance5212
      @dannylance5212 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EricTheActor805 Yes, and no. If a large scale war kicks off it would be nice to have them in war

  • @user-bd5md5cm2j
    @user-bd5md5cm2j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    One awesome rig. Oshkosh has been building massive trucks for the construction industry and trucking industry for a long time. The motor is the best available and there survivability is almost 100% . As long as there's no nukes going off, there electronics will not be a problem. The Humvees can still run after an EMP. Same with the 5 tons

  • @elgoog7830
    @elgoog7830 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I like how the turret on top, keeps rocking around and moving all over the place.

    • @lastmanstanding-xp3ub
      @lastmanstanding-xp3ub ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I saw that too lol, it really seems like it could use some type of simple gyroscopic mount for the gun in particular at least, I don't think it would need to be able travel very far up & down or left & right, just enough degrees to make going over rougher terrain not effect its point of aim too severely

    • @Rich-fr2yv
      @Rich-fr2yv หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Looks like it's locked due to no gun being installed in the turret. Is probably bouncing back and forth on its locking pins

  • @Drakeziel
    @Drakeziel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    For anyone wondering, you cannot buy these as a civilian. Posted my PPA with $230k, was denied due to "availability", ridiculous!

    • @packohub1145
      @packohub1145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      400k already

  • @philthai99
    @philthai99 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I would love to drive this vehicle.

    • @JustinLietz
      @JustinLietz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I used to build and work on these, they are surprisingly agile. It feels like you’re driving a two door sports car. You can’t see a damn thing out of it though, but there are computers with screens inside and cameras all over it. Blind spots are covered really well

  • @randybrown140
    @randybrown140 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sure beats the Hummer 😊

    • @asiangaming8409
      @asiangaming8409 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I don’t care unless it has AC included

  • @radzx10daddy24
    @radzx10daddy24 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm not to sure how that suspension system will handle in a airborne unit after multiple high altitude drops from a high performance aircraft in the middle of the night, I've had those kinds of suspension systems fail on my personal vehicle but hopefully they can function properly

  • @Doubie.
    @Doubie. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That engine might have gm casting makers but it’s every bit a banks power engine

  • @salvatorecorleone1008
    @salvatorecorleone1008 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That front grill looks very vulnerable.

    • @JaimeGarcia-nk2qv
      @JaimeGarcia-nk2qv ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Looks yet it still protected through the inside

  • @alexren9094
    @alexren9094 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What to do with the hood, which is made of fiberglass and can be shot through with small arms?

  • @samc265
    @samc265 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m here bcos of Orlando and P diddy

  • @chazmartin8048
    @chazmartin8048 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lord forbid it has a gm transmission

  • @jimbo1299
    @jimbo1299 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s not scaled down. It’s scaled up ^ with a partnership with Banks

  • @macdawg7866
    @macdawg7866 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does it have a flat bottom? Plenty of mines are currently being used in combat. If GWOT taught us anything, it's that flat bottoms are deadly for the inhabitants should ordinance go off underneath.

  • @juanriverarosa9371
    @juanriverarosa9371 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For some reason, I found it too big - a sitting duck for any rival.

  • @KaizuoSilva
    @KaizuoSilva 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    looks like a beaver

  • @JS-fb6ww
    @JS-fb6ww หลายเดือนก่อน

    It has all that equipment and features and shit but nothing to lock the turret in place

  • @ljmorris6496
    @ljmorris6496 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lock the turret please 😮!!!

  • @scottkluck6480
    @scottkluck6480 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks familiar!😂

  • @tusharchatterjee8986
    @tusharchatterjee8986 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Price please 😊

  • @fredflintstone505
    @fredflintstone505 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great. Powered by a Duramax. One of the crappies diesel engines made today.

  • @iamhugry
    @iamhugry หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does it look like bmw got into military

  • @Forsaken37
    @Forsaken37 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back ground music name

  • @jonnyg9330
    @jonnyg9330 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The OP five or any diesel is dead, nuts, reliable when you takeoff the emission system which the military is exempt from

  • @JohnFKennedy1964
    @JohnFKennedy1964 ปีที่แล้ว

    To bad Oshkosh lost the contract to make the JLTV

  • @MarkzOng
    @MarkzOng ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How many liters/KM or Gallons/miles ?

    • @oeliamoya9796
      @oeliamoya9796 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah they don't measure military vehicles in MPG but range per full tank

  • @sourabhg5418
    @sourabhg5418 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is that much power justified to carry just 4 soldier

  • @stevemiller.
    @stevemiller. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But modern warefare says its a Russian military vehicle...

  • @jkutnink87
    @jkutnink87 ปีที่แล้ว

    Used the wrong motor. Needs a Cummins or CAT.

  • @GlennDuke-yc5ky
    @GlennDuke-yc5ky 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What doesit cost us?

    • @jonvro4022
      @jonvro4022 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Around $250k-$400k per.

  • @JS-fb6ww
    @JS-fb6ww หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah but does it have air conditioning?

  • @AresGoda
    @AresGoda 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TÜV sagt nein

  • @shawncarter5619
    @shawncarter5619 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the JLTV is an oversized garbage barge. We needed a replacement for the Humvee and got a computerized tank that you have to be 5'5 to drive. It has more blind spots than a Hellen Keller convention, and cannot be effectively used for CasEvac.

  • @huckleberryred472
    @huckleberryred472 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Isuzu engine 👍

    • @dannylance5212
      @dannylance5212 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You don't know what your talking about.

    • @lastmanstanding-xp3ub
      @lastmanstanding-xp3ub ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Duramax's are usually what GM uses in Chevrolet/GMC Diesel trucks, don't know where you got Isuzu from lol

    • @dannylance5212
      @dannylance5212 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lastmanstanding-xp3ub They are Duramax, I live in Oshkosh, WI. All I can say.

    • @jacksonreid6412
      @jacksonreid6412 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Brother, please do your research. The initial Duramax design came from Isuzu. However, these engines have been designed and built right here in the US for over twenty years. There’s not much to credit Isuzu for. This is a GM engine built at DMax, LTD in Moraine, Ohio. Not by Isuzu.

  • @johngeverett
    @johngeverett ปีที่แล้ว

    "more powerful than don't think..."
    really, do you proofread your posts?

    • @Flowcologne
      @Flowcologne ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Their videos seem pretty AI created to me. That could be the problem here 😅

    • @Across_Media
      @Across_Media  ปีที่แล้ว

      AI? I’m sorry, you wrong.

    • @Forsaken37
      @Forsaken37 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Across_Mediawhat's the name of the background music name

  • @EMTBAFV
    @EMTBAFV 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Troops hate it and want the humvee back

  • @janjanpamposa4153
    @janjanpamposa4153 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not good its too wiggly

  • @djordjetodorovic4176
    @djordjetodorovic4176 ปีที่แล้ว

    Serbian M16 Milos is far better

    • @Intrusive_Thought176
      @Intrusive_Thought176 ปีที่แล้ว

      How?

    • @djordjetodorovic4176
      @djordjetodorovic4176 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Intrusive_Thought176 look at specifications... Better mobility, higher capacity and better protection... Also... A lot cheeper

    • @Intrusive_Thought176
      @Intrusive_Thought176 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Djordje Todorovic better protection? Armour for the jltv is classified

    • @Intrusive_Thought176
      @Intrusive_Thought176 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Djordje Todorovic The Joint Light Tactical Vehicles Family of Vehicles (JLTV FoV) is an Army-led, joint-service program designed to replace a portion of each service’s light tactical wheeled vehicle fleets while closing an existing capability gap. Intended to provide protected, sustained, networked mobility for personnel and payloads across the full range of military operations, the JLTV FoV will restore the fleet’s balance of payload, performance, and protection.
      The JLTV FoV consists of two variants: the four-seat Combat Tactical Vehicle (CTV) and the two-seat Combat Support Vehicle (CSV). The CTV will support the General Purpose, Heavy Gun Carrier, and Close Combat Weapon Carrier missions. The CSV will support the Utility/Shelter Carrier mission. The JLTV is transportable by a range of lift assets, including rotary-wing aircraft, to support operations across the range of military operations. Its maneuverability enables activities across the spectrum of terrain, including urban areas, while providing inherent and supplemental armor against direct fire and improvised explosive device threats.. idk bro other than capacity they are basically the same

    • @djordjetodorovic4176
      @djordjetodorovic4176 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Intrusive_Thought176 M16 have stanaag 2-3

  • @timyrabbit
    @timyrabbit ปีที่แล้ว

    Overpriced for what its job is. A $26,000 Kornet missile would toast this thing

    • @jkutnink87
      @jkutnink87 ปีที่แล้ว

      or a $3,300 155mm round as an IED can destroy it as well.. So what? You still need to deliver the round or missile and hope either isn't seen so its not defeated.

    • @timyrabbit
      @timyrabbit ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jkutnink87 figured you’d think about an IED. It’s overpriced you didn’t address that.

    • @T34theAmericanheavy
      @T34theAmericanheavy หลายเดือนก่อน

      And a .30¢ bullet will kill a human, a $9000 shell can destroy a 10 million dollar tank. To evaluate a piece of equipment’s value by comparing its cost to the munitions that can destroy it is moronic.

    • @timyrabbit
      @timyrabbit หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@T34theAmericanheavy actually it’s not, not at all, it’s what general attrition warfare is. You are just a warthunder player run along now

    • @T34theAmericanheavy
      @T34theAmericanheavy หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timyrabbit we produce 320,000 semi trucks a year in the us, we can produce these things out the ass

  • @ClaudeMagicbox
    @ClaudeMagicbox ปีที่แล้ว +2

    400Hp is not enough for this huge armored thing, common!
    There are street SUVs nowadays that have over 7-800 Hp, this should at least be at that level

    • @jolivera8451
      @jolivera8451 ปีที่แล้ว

      6.6L turbo diesel only 400hp, yea that’s way low for that size engine.

    • @lastmanstanding-xp3ub
      @lastmanstanding-xp3ub ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wonder what kind of torque numbers it's putting out, since it's a diesel powered Duramax motor (diesel Chevrolet trucks usually come wjth them), it probably doesn't make a whole bunch of HP but instead has a shit load of torque.

    • @jolivera8451
      @jolivera8451 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lastmanstanding-xp3ub good point

    • @ChihuahuaPlane
      @ChihuahuaPlane ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You guys don’t understand that diesel engines put out major amounts of torque

    • @craythebman5812
      @craythebman5812 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@lastmanstanding-xp3ub reports are that it produces 800 fr/lbs of torque and can travel at 70+mph.

  • @UpatoiCreekRifles
    @UpatoiCreekRifles 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool till the electronics go out

  • @imjustthere9343
    @imjustthere9343 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doesnt the taliban have these too?

    • @ameerhamid89
      @ameerhamid89 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only in right-wing anti-Biden wet dreams

    • @samiman5606
      @samiman5606 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The talibros they will have it in the next war