Now that the Dusk till down set came out, do you feel like the lore got better or do you think it's still slowly growing? I'm a bit behind doing FAB lore content myself but I think its the best lore out of a tcg I've seen.
The DTD story additions have been great, but I still feel like the story itself is in the growing phase - we haven’t seen where it’s going yet and I don’t believe we will for some time. That’s perfectly fine, of course, I’d prefer to let FaB lore grow rather than rush to some “epic” conclusion.
Looking to see what about the MtG Lore is off putting. I don't disagree, just looking to see your thoughts on what disappoints you about the MtG Lore. For me lately it has no build up or very rarely has the build up and is just set pieces about a character that gives no worldbuilding or there is more to it than just the time and place.
You convinced me. I’ll try to give F&B a chance. I’m usually a very typical Timmy green color big beast creature Smash and Crush unga bunga type of player in MTG. What’s a good equivalent for that in F&B?
@@gydrah4244 I wouldn't say _too difficult_ really - there's two different Araknis, and the 'better' of the two requires you to keep track of a lot of stuff at once for maximum value.
![Who is Arakni? [Flesh and Blood Lore]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uy7GQ6BSiZw/mqdefault.jpg)
The lore of Flesh and Blood has so much potential and it's nice to join that adventure while it's been writen.
I honestly didn’t even know the pinkertons were still around until the recent news.
Now that the Dusk till down set came out, do you feel like the lore got better or do you think it's still slowly growing? I'm a bit behind doing FAB lore content myself but I think its the best lore out of a tcg I've seen.
The DTD story additions have been great, but I still feel like the story itself is in the growing phase - we haven’t seen where it’s going yet and I don’t believe we will for some time. That’s perfectly fine, of course, I’d prefer to let FaB lore grow rather than rush to some “epic” conclusion.
@@The_Loreseeker Definitely agree. They are very focused on the war that's going on and that's why I think outside got a bit ignored. Great content 👌
Looking to see what about the MtG Lore is off putting. I don't disagree, just looking to see your thoughts on what disappoints you about the MtG Lore. For me lately it has no build up or very rarely has the build up and is just set pieces about a character that gives no worldbuilding or there is more to it than just the time and place.
You convinced me. I’ll try to give F&B a chance.
I’m usually a very typical Timmy green color big beast creature Smash and Crush unga bunga type of player in MTG. What’s a good equivalent for that in F&B?
Definitely Bravo. He is like just make a big swing each turn and win the match type of guy.
Yeah a guardian or brute hero might work great - give Bravo a try, you might like him!
Do you have any archetype recommendations for first time players? I had been aware fo Flesh and Blood, but the rules at the time seemed daunting.
Warrior and Guardian are both relatively simple classes to pick up and play, from my experience.
@@The_Loreseeker so I'm guessing that playing Arakni would be too difficult?
@@gydrah4244 I wouldn't say _too difficult_ really - there's two different Araknis, and the 'better' of the two requires you to keep track of a lot of stuff at once for maximum value.
@@The_Loreseeker is the better one the contract one????
@@VictorJimenez-id4dh In my opinion, yes
also please post more f&b content please
I assure you - more FaB is coming