By rule the timeout is to be granted whether they have any or not, at the expenses of a technical foul. Coach is an idiot. Official did what he was supposed to do.
By rule timeouts are requested and granted. I am ignoring the timeout call as an official. Just like I do when a coach is down 20 and tries to call timeout with 5 seconds left. I’m not giving him the timeout and game is over. Officiating is more than black and white. There’s a lot of gray. And good officials know how to call in the gray.
@@ryankey4980 If you ignore a rule because of personal preference you do not deserve to be an official. There are plenty of others who are willing to replace you and call the game by the rules.
Everyone in the gym has to know that the visiting is out of timeouts.... Referee's , Coaches and Players ....Communication is important but The Technical Fouls were warranted.
I think people look at the TIME OUTs backwards when it comes to the rules. I say this because you are NEVER really OUT of Time Outs in Basketball. Look at it another way. You have X amount of FREE Time Outs. After you have used all of those FREE Time Outs you may then PURCHASE a Time Out at the cost of a Technical Foul. You will not find it written this way in the Rules. But in effect this is what happens. Some may think that is crazy but it isn't. What if your team was up 10 or 20 points late in the game. You have used all of your FREE Time Outs. Your team is GASSED. They just cannot go anymore. But you CAN still get a TIme Out if you need it. If you call a Time Out you did not have after suffering the penalty of a Technical Foul you will still receive the Time Out. If a 1 minute break or maybe just a chance to sub in fresh players is the difference between maintaining the Lead you have and losing you would gladly BUY that Time Out. And if you have been behaving like an Adult all night and did every detail of you job right what is 1 Technical Foul to you. Nothing really. It's just 2 Free Throws and 1 Possession. And if you ask for the Time Out during a Dead Ball before the opponent takes Possession it doesn't really even cost the Possession. It was going to be their Ball anyway before you paid for the Time Out.
Jeremy Holmes not necessarily. With the Technical, by rule, white team retains possession at half court. Black WOULD have had a chance to foul quickly or steal the inbound for a chance to win/tie with 1.5 seconds left. I would start by saying the Coaching staff is responsible for notifying their players after the last one used or if they did, it’s the player’s fault for not always knowing “time and score” situations. Either way, the HC sealed their fate by taking the double T and ejection. You can read his lips “How can you call that,” but as an official, when a player is that adamant about calling a timeout, we have to grant it per request. If we could (and to clarify we are NOT able to do this) we would prefer to just ignore the request and let play go on since we as a crew, would know they have none. However, until that day, it will always be the “Chris Webber” situation. Tough way to go out for sure.
I remember watching this on the Baller Visions channel. If I remember correctly, this playoff game was played as a true home game because of a scramble for a neutral venue that could handle the crowd that would show up. That's why the seats are packed tighter than sardines and there are dozens of people standing. I say all that only to comment that it's a wonder that in this tough-and-tight postseason game between rivals the crowd was passionate but knew its boundaries. Some of the visiting team's fans may have been tempted to become unhinged like their coach but thanks be to God they didn't. It could have been really ugly. All it would have taken to keep this situation from happening was for the visiting team's coach to have told his team right before the home team's free throws with 1.9 seconds left, "We have NO TIMEOUTS remaining."
This is all on the Foothills Coach for a) not telling his team they hav no timeouts left and b) if he did tell his team and the kid who called the timeout made a mistake, then as a Coach you hav to accept that your kid made a mistake and not make it worse by being a little crybaby and getting on the official for doing his job!!!! That Coach was looking to blame the ref for a mistake made by him or one of his kids, so IMO that tells a lot about a persons identity and maturity level, that coach is just a big egotistical crybaby and was a very bad role model in this situation. He is teaching his kids the wrong way and will probably keep blaming the refs for losing the game and his kids will NOT learn the proper lesson from this…….. As a Coach myself I cringe when I see other Coaches acting like this!! Shame on him
That’s because he has been taught the wrong way by that coach or whomever…..it’s the kids who lose out on important life lessons when you hav coaches not being able to handle their emotions and looking for others to blame for their shortcoming
Teaching point. By rule the officials had no choice and granted the time out. Handling the coach: The other 2 officials must keep the coach away from the calling official. Much like MLB, the other umpires stay between the coach and the umpire when possible. The coach should have been given another "T" when he was in the middle of the court. By him going all the way across the court, could have gotten the fans more involved. Another point is where was the Principal? He or she is in charge of their school and if this is a playoff game, I am sure they were there. It is their job to keep order with their staff and students. The coach should have been intercepted before he crossed the court by the Principal. These videos help all of us when faced with tough situations. We look at them as a way to learn.
I'm a hockey official and found this video by accident. Forgive me, as I don't know the official procedures, but where are the other two officials as the coach is backing away from the confrontation until he has his back to the stands/fans (who could be parents that are just as hot as the coach?) Shouldn't at least one of them been in between the two to attempt to defuse the situation and protect his fellow official?
I am personally not happy with how the officials worked together on this, but I also feel that there is nothing to diffuse. The coach made a decision to be a jerk and got ejected as a result. The team in black can request a timeout and it was heads up by the team to call one and the officials to properly grant one. The coach should know this and should have kept his cool. If I had called the first T, I am not backing up anywhere. He is going to earn that and if the coach comes out during a timeout, he will get a chance to go back, but he choose not to. He had to go and he was sent away.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos Well, of course the coach is 100% responsible for what occurred, but there was an incident that needed diffusing. The official would not have been in as dangerous of a situation if the rest of the crew stepped in between them.
@@phillip7853: My overall point is there is not much you can do if the coach is off the rails. He should have realized how silly he looked following him across the court. Now as I said I would have stopped at some point and if he kept coming, then he was mine at that point, I would not have needed extra help. And has his partners the minute he passed me the I would have had no issue. But in this situation, this coach was out of control and if he kept his head he might have still had a chance to win otherwise.
What I don't understand is why when the Official that Banged the Coach when he was backing up the rest of the Crew didn't go and help him and move the Coach away from him?
So now I have a question. Does the first technical go to the player, or does it go to the bench? If it goes to the bench then the coach should have been kicked out after his first technical, right?
This is from the nfhs rule book: "* Reminder - any single flagrant act results in disqualification A single flagrant foul, the second direct technical foul or the third technical foul (any combination of direct or indirect) charged to the head coach results in ejection to the team's locker room or outside the building."
Bruce Fielding yeah, that was Jaylen Hands I think, the Zona recruit. At that point, 6 shots plus possession and only 1.5 seconds left. Baring some type of freak thing (missing them all and turning the ball over on a 5-second count or inbound turnover etc), this game was wrapped with a bow on it.
He probably was contending that the player did not call for a timeout. Then he probably contended that the officials should not have granted an actual request. There are officials that will try to suggest if you know they are out of timeouts, do not grant a request. I do not agree with that thinking, but I know it is out there. And the video is the reason you have to be careful taking that stance. This video is a perfect example that the "Tape does not lie."
I think what he is saying is, don't grant them a timeout when you know they don't have one so that the game doesn't end like this. If the ref ignores the request, the game goes to overtime and we don't see three technicals called and have the coach get kicked out and watch a team win a game with no time left by shooting free throws.
And I completely understand your point. I wouldn't blame a ref for looking the other way and not granting the timeout. I probably would've been one of those refs trying to look the other way. That being said, I always remind my team when we are out of timeouts. The coach has no one to blame but himself.
Look at that Hotheaded Coaches. With 1 Technical the guy missing BOTH shots and with 2 Technical Fouls he only makes 1 shot. Get yourself under control. Act like an adult and COACH your team. If you hold you cool all you need in THIS instance is 1 Defensive Stop to get into Overtime. But you had to act like a CHILD. You EARNED the all 3 of those calls... but you only had to suffer the effects of 1 of those calls if you just act like an Adult. And you might have still WON the game in Overtime.
First order of business: As I recall the rule, the TO is granted, but at the cost of a T. T on the coach should've been called the moment he went on the floor to challenge the ref. At the third technical, forfeiture should've been considered, because he was given a LOT of leeway, especially given the game situation. For what it's worth, when the camera pans over, there should've been a technical for unsportsmanlike on the other team's player for the "crazy" reaction.
I just came across this video. I am a long time volleyball official and only did basketball for two years because of coaches like this one. That being said, I would have had one question for the official. Did he know that they had no timeouts remaining? If he did, preventative officiating says you ignore the timeout request and move on to overtime. If he wasn't aware, then he had no alternative.
I do not think it matters if he was aware. The team has to be aware. The players need to be aware. If the official ignores the timeout and that team wins, we might have another video of how the officials ignored an obvious request for a timeout and cost the other team the game. So it is incumbent on the teams to know their timeout situation and not put themselves or the officials in a position to call one on their behalf. Especially in an adamant way this player made that request.
It would not be fair to the other team for the officials to simply ignore the timeout request, knowing that there were none left. This places the burden on the other team to know the timeout count and read the officials mind. In this scenario, timeout is called but no timeouts remain. The officials know the count and ignore the request. The other team does not and seeing the timeout request let up on defense. The team on offense then has an easier path to the basket. It is not fair to place the burden on the other team to respond to a mistake made by your team.
If the player (#3 in black in this case) had verbally asked for timeout once the ref could possibly ignore it, but the kid is screaming timeout to the ref, who is only a few feet away and visually calling for timeout repeatedly. If the ref ignored it in this case he likely would have faced a lot of criticism from his superiors for that.
I dont understand the confusion...Black calls timeout and they dont ha e any...simple straight forward as you acn get....the coach lasted to long if you ask me.... he was totally out of control!
I was on the losing team. I refused to shake any hands after the game. I was not involved in any of the technical fouls BTW. I was innocent and other people made me lose. I hate that life is that way sometimes. Sometimes you have no control over bad shit happening to you. Three days after this, my mom and dad both died in a car wreck so I never got to go to college. I now work at Jack In The Box and live in a tent under a bridge. Please come try our new Cluck sandwich...it will be the best chicken sandwich you’ll ever eat. Yes, better than Chic-Fil-A. Or Wendy’s. Or Burger King. Or especially McDonalds. Mickey D’s sucks ass!
First off, you go to the book, and find out if they have any. If not, it's a T for that. Especially under the circumstances, I actually would've considered forfeiture here for gross misconduct. Not only has the coach already been T'd, he then follows the official all the way across the court and requires outside intervention. Game over and awarded to the other team.
Ref handled the coach poorly. Instead of backing up and letting his partners T him and toss him, he should have hit him right away as soon as he walked on the court.
zforce32 actually he did what we are taught to do rotate away to try to defuse the situation. partners should have teed him up as he advanced. they also missed or ignored the player going to the locker room for unauthorized reason which should have been the fourth tech. unfortunate circumstances but you have to be aware of game situations whether notified of timeouts beforehand or not.
Referee that called T #1 did the right thing. He was backing away so he wasn't the one who ejected the coach. His partners did not do their job until the official was backed against the crowd. I would be pissed if my crew allowed this to happen. As soon as the first T was given, his partners should of stepped in the way of the coach and tossed him as he was not going to calm down.
The thing is is he did the First T if he did the second T it would look like the ref had a vendetta against the coach and the team. The other members of the crew need to back in right away to T up the coach.
Give coach TO with .6 on clock. Shoot the Technical and play the remaining .TO with the Technical. Coach should have remained calm and not stepped on the floor.
Honestly his partners should have stepped in he did the right thing and tried to get away from the situation. His partners need to give the second technical foul.
The officials should’ve known better than to give a unnecessary technical with 1 second left because unless it is a blatant situation you should never give a call on a tied game which will ultimately effect the outcome of the game. Plus the officials should’ve already known they had no timeouts left.
What the fuck are you talking about??? First of all, why would the ref know how many timeouts each team has??? Second, if a player calls timeout, you blow the whistle and give them the time out.
Alex H Clearly you’ve never officiated a basketball game. The referees are suppose to have knowledge of what’s going on in a game; especially in a close game within the last minute. Secondly, if a player called a timeout with next to no time left on the clock you shouldn’t acknowledge the call to prevent effecting the outcome of the game. Officials are game managers; the game should’ve went into overtime. Maybe you should learn how to officiate before making ignorant statements.
@@dabestcoach You are trying to say that MAKING a Call effects that game... but making a NO CALL does not effect the game. That is ridiculous. You must make that call for the Time Out. If you don't you are GUTLESS as a Ref. Would you swallow you whistle if someone knocks the ball OOB? Would you swallow your whistle on a FOUL? You might. But you shouldn't. You get nowhere by being the gutless Ref.
I encourage the reading of the rule book. This was handled by the letter of the rule. From the timeout being granted to the ejection, this crew executed how they needed to given the scenario that played out.
By rule the timeout is to be granted whether they have any or not, at the expenses of a technical foul. Coach is an idiot. Official did what he was supposed to do.
By rule timeouts are requested and granted. I am ignoring the timeout call as an official. Just like I do when a coach is down 20 and tries to call timeout with 5 seconds left. I’m not giving him the timeout and game is over. Officiating is more than black and white. There’s a lot of gray. And good officials know how to call in the gray.
@@ryankey4980 If you ignore a rule because of personal preference you do not deserve to be an official. There are plenty of others who are willing to replace you and call the game by the rules.
Everyone in the gym has to know that the visiting is out of timeouts.... Referee's , Coaches and Players ....Communication is important but The Technical Fouls were warranted.
@@JamesBCrazy Good refs are actually in incredibly short reply due to idiots like u who don’t know the rules but think they do
As bad as it looks the ref made the right call...no timeout = TECH
Exactly because excessive timeouts
I think people look at the TIME OUTs backwards when it comes to the rules. I say this because you are NEVER really OUT of Time Outs in Basketball.
Look at it another way.
You have X amount of FREE Time Outs. After you have used all of those FREE Time Outs you may then PURCHASE a Time Out at the cost of a Technical Foul.
You will not find it written this way in the Rules. But in effect this is what happens.
Some may think that is crazy but it isn't. What if your team was up 10 or 20 points late in the game. You have used all of your FREE Time Outs.
Your team is GASSED. They just cannot go anymore. But you CAN still get a TIme Out if you need it.
If you call a Time Out you did not have after suffering the penalty of a Technical Foul you will still receive the Time Out.
If a 1 minute break or maybe just a chance to sub in fresh players is the difference between maintaining the Lead you have and losing you would gladly BUY that Time Out.
And if you have been behaving like an Adult all night and did every detail of you job right what is 1 Technical Foul to you.
Nothing really. It's just 2 Free Throws and 1 Possession.
And if you ask for the Time Out during a Dead Ball before the opponent takes Possession it doesn't really even cost the Possession.
It was going to be their Ball anyway before you paid for the Time Out.
brucemercer I call that smart coaching and a great way to revive and possibly sub a player or two. Great call
I love that the first kid missed both shots so without the coaches technicals they would've been going to overtime.
Jeremy Holmes not necessarily. With the Technical, by rule, white team retains possession at half court. Black WOULD have had a chance to foul quickly or steal the inbound for a chance to win/tie with 1.5 seconds left. I would start by saying the Coaching staff is responsible for notifying their players after the last one used or if they did, it’s the player’s fault for not always knowing “time and score” situations. Either way, the HC sealed their fate by taking the double T and ejection. You can read his lips “How can you call that,” but as an official, when a player is that adamant about calling a timeout, we have to grant it per request. If we could (and to clarify we are NOT able to do this) we would prefer to just ignore the request and let play go on since we as a crew, would know they have none. However, until that day, it will always be the “Chris Webber” situation. Tough way to go out for sure.
I remember watching this on the Baller Visions channel. If I remember correctly, this playoff game was played as a true home game because of a scramble for a neutral venue that could handle the crowd that would show up. That's why the seats are packed tighter than sardines and there are dozens of people standing. I say all that only to comment that it's a wonder that in this tough-and-tight postseason game between rivals the crowd was passionate but knew its boundaries. Some of the visiting team's fans may have been tempted to become unhinged like their coach but thanks be to God they didn't. It could have been really ugly. All it would have taken to keep this situation from happening was for the visiting team's coach to have told his team right before the home team's free throws with 1.9 seconds left, "We have NO TIMEOUTS remaining."
This is all on the Foothills Coach for a) not telling his team they hav no timeouts left and b) if he did tell his team and the kid who called the timeout made a mistake, then as a Coach you hav to accept that your kid made a mistake and not make it worse by being a little crybaby and getting on the official for doing his job!!!! That Coach was looking to blame the ref for a mistake made by him or one of his kids, so IMO that tells a lot about a persons identity and maturity level, that coach is just a big egotistical crybaby and was a very bad role model in this situation. He is teaching his kids the wrong way and will probably keep blaming the refs for losing the game and his kids will NOT learn the proper lesson from this…….. As a Coach myself I cringe when I see other Coaches acting like this!! Shame on him
The coach should have been thrown out the instant he went onto the court. He shouldn't be out there.
Agreed!! They gave him way too much latitude to be out on the floor.
Unbelievable that Black #1 wants his team to walk out, and that he actually does.
A Better Official Jaylen Hands is kinda one of those Self Centered, Arrogant Players.
That’s because he has been taught the wrong way by that coach or whomever…..it’s the kids who lose out on important life lessons when you hav coaches not being able to handle their emotions and looking for others to blame for their shortcoming
Teaching point. By rule the officials had no choice and granted the time out. Handling the coach: The other 2 officials must keep the coach away from the calling official. Much like MLB, the other umpires stay between the coach and the umpire when possible. The coach should have been given another "T" when he was in the middle of the court. By him going all the way across the court, could have gotten the fans more involved. Another point is where was the Principal? He or she is in charge of their school and if this is a playoff game, I am sure they were there. It is their job to keep order with their staff and students. The coach should have been intercepted before he crossed the court by the Principal. These videos help all of us when faced with tough situations. We look at them as a way to learn.
I'm a hockey official and found this video by accident. Forgive me, as I don't know the official procedures, but where are the other two officials as the coach is backing away from the confrontation until he has his back to the stands/fans (who could be parents that are just as hot as the coach?) Shouldn't at least one of them been in between the two to attempt to defuse the situation and protect his fellow official?
I am personally not happy with how the officials worked together on this, but I also feel that there is nothing to diffuse. The coach made a decision to be a jerk and got ejected as a result. The team in black can request a timeout and it was heads up by the team to call one and the officials to properly grant one. The coach should know this and should have kept his cool. If I had called the first T, I am not backing up anywhere. He is going to earn that and if the coach comes out during a timeout, he will get a chance to go back, but he choose not to. He had to go and he was sent away.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos Well, of course the coach is 100% responsible for what occurred, but there was an incident that needed diffusing. The official would not have been in as dangerous of a situation if the rest of the crew stepped in between them.
@@phillip7853: My overall point is there is not much you can do if the coach is off the rails. He should have realized how silly he looked following him across the court. Now as I said I would have stopped at some point and if he kept coming, then he was mine at that point, I would not have needed extra help. And has his partners the minute he passed me the I would have had no issue. But in this situation, this coach was out of control and if he kept his head he might have still had a chance to win otherwise.
What I don't understand is why when the Official that Banged the Coach when he was backing up the rest of the Crew didn't go and help him and move the Coach away from him?
duuuuude that was my exact thought, his crew just left him to fend for himself. thats unacceptable
So now I have a question. Does the first technical go to the player, or does it go to the bench? If it goes to the bench then the coach should have been kicked out after his first technical, right?
This is from the nfhs rule book: "* Reminder - any single flagrant act results in disqualification
A single flagrant foul, the second direct technical foul or the third technical foul (any combination of direct or indirect) charged to the head coach results in ejection to the team's locker room or outside the building."
There could have been another T for the player leaving the court/bench too.. But at this point, who cares.. go home guys. :)
Bruce Fielding yeah, that was Jaylen Hands I think, the Zona recruit. At that point, 6 shots plus possession and only 1.5 seconds left. Baring some type of freak thing (missing them all and turning the ball over on a 5-second count or inbound turnover etc), this game was wrapped with a bow on it.
Bad coaching is not having your players aware of the timeout situation.
What's the problem? Everything was correct.
Thats what im saying
If that coach didn't get fired, the board of education should all resign.
With what they're teaching in school,,,, I'm surprised the coach didn't get a "participation" trophy!
Why was the coach so pissed? If he has no timeouts, he has no timeouts.
He probably was contending that the player did not call for a timeout. Then he probably contended that the officials should not have granted an actual request. There are officials that will try to suggest if you know they are out of timeouts, do not grant a request. I do not agree with that thinking, but I know it is out there. And the video is the reason you have to be careful taking that stance. This video is a perfect example that the "Tape does not lie."
My training was that you grant the timeout but the coach pays for it with a technical.
I think what he is saying is, don't grant them a timeout when you know they don't have one so that the game doesn't end like this. If the ref ignores the request, the game goes to overtime and we don't see three technicals called and have the coach get kicked out and watch a team win a game with no time left by shooting free throws.
Tj Mckenzie understand your point. But if u knowingly set aside a rule u r then being unfair to the other team.
And I completely understand your point. I wouldn't blame a ref for looking the other way and not granting the timeout. I probably would've been one of those refs trying to look the other way. That being said, I always remind my team when we are out of timeouts. The coach has no one to blame but himself.
Doesn't the coach get to select who shoots the free throws for a T? This kid was their best free throw shooter? Sheesh.
That Christian was wild
Look at that Hotheaded Coaches. With 1 Technical the guy missing BOTH shots and with 2 Technical Fouls he only makes 1 shot. Get yourself under control.
Act like an adult and COACH your team. If you hold you cool all you need in THIS instance is 1 Defensive Stop to get into Overtime. But you had to act like a CHILD.
You EARNED the all 3 of those calls... but you only had to suffer the effects of 1 of those calls if you just act like an Adult.
And you might have still WON the game in Overtime.
First order of business: As I recall the rule, the TO is granted, but at the cost of a T.
T on the coach should've been called the moment he went on the floor to challenge the ref.
At the third technical, forfeiture should've been considered, because he was given a LOT of leeway, especially given the game situation.
For what it's worth, when the camera pans over, there should've been a technical for unsportsmanlike on the other team's player for the "crazy" reaction.
Oh stop it Mr Technical Foul.
@@thomasmckenzie4584 what did he say that was wrong, look up the rule in the nfhs rulebook and it spells it out clearly
I just came across this video. I am a long time volleyball official and only did basketball for two years because of coaches like this one. That being said, I would have had one question for the official. Did he know that they had no timeouts remaining? If he did, preventative officiating says you ignore the timeout request and move on to overtime. If he wasn't aware, then he had no alternative.
I do not think it matters if he was aware. The team has to be aware. The players need to be aware. If the official ignores the timeout and that team wins, we might have another video of how the officials ignored an obvious request for a timeout and cost the other team the game. So it is incumbent on the teams to know their timeout situation and not put themselves or the officials in a position to call one on their behalf. Especially in an adamant way this player made that request.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos sorry coach. Didn't see it.
Then the film shows it happen and they will not they will punitive on social media showing how incompetent you are. You cannot win.
It would not be fair to the other team for the officials to simply ignore the timeout request, knowing that there were none left. This places the burden on the other team to know the timeout count and read the officials mind.
In this scenario, timeout is called but no timeouts remain. The officials know the count and ignore the request. The other team does not and seeing the timeout request let up on defense. The team on offense then has an easier path to the basket. It is not fair to place the burden on the other team to respond to a mistake made by your team.
If the player (#3 in black in this case) had verbally asked for timeout once the ref could possibly ignore it, but the kid is screaming timeout to the ref, who is only a few feet away and visually calling for timeout repeatedly. If the ref ignored it in this case he likely would have faced a lot of criticism from his superiors for that.
Coach should be suspended from the League
Doesn't the school have "Christian" in their name?
I dont understand the confusion...Black calls timeout and they dont ha e any...simple straight forward as you acn get....the coach lasted to long if you ask me.... he was totally out of control!
Bad admnistration of a play! After that, game over for all purposes! Coach is bully, needs to have a sit down.
I was on the losing team. I refused to shake any hands after the game. I was not involved in any of the technical fouls BTW. I was innocent and other people made me lose. I hate that life is that way sometimes. Sometimes you have no control over bad shit happening to you. Three days after this, my mom and dad both died in a car wreck so I never got to go to college. I now work at Jack In The Box and live in a tent under a bridge. Please come try our new Cluck sandwich...it will be the best chicken sandwich you’ll ever eat. Yes, better than Chic-Fil-A. Or Wendy’s. Or Burger King. Or especially McDonalds. Mickey D’s sucks ass!
First off, you go to the book, and find out if they have any. If not, it's a T for that.
Especially under the circumstances, I actually would've considered forfeiture here for gross misconduct. Not only has the coach already been T'd, he then follows the official all the way across the court and requires outside intervention. Game over and awarded to the other team.
Arrest the coach! RC
Clock is at zero, overtime? RC
Ref handled the coach poorly. Instead of backing up and letting his partners T him and toss him, he should have hit him right away as soon as he walked on the court.
zforce32 actually he did what we are taught to do rotate away to try to defuse the situation. partners should have teed him up as he advanced. they also missed or ignored the player going to the locker room for unauthorized reason which should have been the fourth tech. unfortunate circumstances but you have to be aware of game situations whether notified of timeouts beforehand or not.
Referee that called T #1 did the right thing. He was backing away so he wasn't the one who ejected the coach. His partners did not do their job until the official was backed against the crowd. I would be pissed if my crew allowed this to happen. As soon as the first T was given, his partners should of stepped in the way of the coach and tossed him as he was not going to calm down.
The thing is is he did the First T if he did the second T it would look like the ref had a vendetta against the coach and the team. The other members of the crew need to back in right away to T up the coach.
Give coach TO with .6 on clock. Shoot the Technical and play the remaining .TO with the Technical. Coach should have remained calm and not stepped on the floor.
Honestly his partners should have stepped in he did the right thing and tried to get away from the situation. His partners need to give the second technical foul.
Way to lose the game coach!
The officials should’ve known better than to give a unnecessary technical with 1 second left because unless it is a blatant situation you should never give a call on a tied game which will ultimately effect the outcome of the game. Plus the officials should’ve already known they had no timeouts left.
What the fuck are you talking about??? First of all, why would the ref know how many timeouts each team has??? Second, if a player calls timeout, you blow the whistle and give them the time out.
Alex H Clearly you’ve never officiated a basketball game. The referees are suppose to have knowledge of what’s going on in a game; especially in a close game within the last minute.
Secondly, if a player called a timeout with next to no time left on the clock you shouldn’t acknowledge the call to prevent effecting the outcome of the game.
Officials are game managers; the game should’ve went into overtime. Maybe you should learn how to officiate before making ignorant statements.
So you are saying that the refs should ignore the rule, not make the right call, and cheat the other team
Alex H by making that call you’ve determined the outcome of the game. If the coach made the call versus a player I would’ve understood.
@@dabestcoach You are trying to say that MAKING a Call effects that game... but making a NO CALL does not effect the game. That is ridiculous.
You must make that call for the Time Out. If you don't you are GUTLESS as a Ref. Would you swallow you whistle if someone knocks the ball OOB?
Would you swallow your whistle on a FOUL? You might. But you shouldn't. You get nowhere by being the gutless Ref.
I would have immediately pulled my team from the court. He got ripped off his team got ripped off. What a horrible job by the referees
Radionut R
For what? Giving a timeout you asked for?
I encourage the reading of the rule book. This was handled by the letter of the rule. From the timeout being granted to the ejection, this crew executed how they needed to given the scenario that played out.
Why??? Did you even watch the video??? They literally zoom in on the player calling the timeout that they don't have
What number is your son?
You are clueless.
Allowing your player to leave to floor early = CLASSLESS