I am going to say this to all those that do not know the purpose of this site. This site is for officials learning rules. No one said that this was a high school game. It is clearly the Big East Tournament. But a Flagrant 1 Foul is the same as an Intentional Foul in the high school game. This is not a fanboy site, this is for officials to learn rules and interpretations as it relates to the game of basketball. This is kind of the purpose of the site (if you read the purpose of this site instead of just watching one video).
Your title is written correctly and conveys the meaning you intended. I teach and see this happen all the time. People, instead of actually reading what is written make an assumption and then get frustrated when what they get is not what they thought it was supposed to be. They refuse to acknowledge that they screwed up since they are perfect and never make a mistake so obviously the mistake was yours. Keep up the great work. I love your videos and learn a lot about the game from your posts. Thank you!
FF1 on original shot, then bench technicals offsetting (both indirect to head coaches) for players leaving no matter how many as long as they don't participate in any combative act. Then offsetting direct technicals to both head coaches for jawing. Resume with the FF1 shots to the fouled player (which they did) and throw in to offended team at the POI nearest the spot of the foul. (All done correctly)
Ima Big10 Boy Midwest Kid but Damn The Big East was fun to watch back in the day Lol I got goosebumps watching this lol like a flashback of 80s 90s Big East
White 3 gets an intentional foul for sure. Blue 24 and 42 each should get a technical foul for shoving. Blue 24 will shoot two free throws, then any White player can shoot 4 free throws. White throw in from midline.
If you go a Flagrant on the original foul on the St. John's player, it is definitely a Flagrant 1 because it was unnecessary but not necessarily excessive. T on 24 of Georgetown for one shove, didn't get a clear look, but you could call a second T on Georgetown 42 for another. T and immediate toss for both coaches for almost starting a major altercation. After all the FT's, check alternate possession because both teams got T's.
I don't know how either of those Georgetown players didn't get a technical foul for pushing the St. John's player into the crowd. I'm truly baffled by that.
AdamCarl7 Never said it wasn't a foul, I just said it wasn't that hard of a foul for everyone to go at each other, the guy landed on his feet, just shoot the free throws and play the game, we've all seen worse haha
Of course it was intended, stops team from scoring 2, now he gets free throws if he misses no points scored. You see teams do that a lot towards the end of the game. Good defense, cheap, but good. Just a way to try to get the ball back without the other team scoring.
@@brucemercer7753: I think he had or has a son coaching college basketball and was at the time in the Big East. His son at least recently was coaching at Louisville (I looked it up).
1st I am a Ref and just subscribed. But my question has NOTHING to do with the rules. Is Jon Thompson the 3rd an Assistant Coach at Georgetown now? or is he an Assistant Coach at St Johns? Or is he just there as a Fan and hanging out with his Dad? I know Patrick Ewing is the new Head Coach at Georgetown and Chris Mullens is the Head Coach at St Johns. Good to see those 2 back in the game somehow. I don't think most former players end up being very good coaches. But these 2 are both VERY SMART former players and I think they will both make it.
This was 2 seasons ago and the GT staff is different now. Patrick Ewing Sr. is now the coach and his son at the time was an assistant as he played for JT3 while at GT.
The guy who committed the foul who puts his hands and gets pushed, and the opposing team who shoves him, If I was on the guy who put his hands up, I am socking the player who pushed him no matter what his race or gender. I garauntee the other team would behave the same way.
So here's what I got, I've got a personal foul in the St. John's player, he wasn't excessive or malicious, and I don't think it warranted a flagrant foul. After the play, and in the dead ball situation, I have fighting fouls on 24th from Georgetown and 42 from Georgetown, and they're both gone. Gone. I have double technicals on both coaches, and they're both gone. I think that about covers it.
It is a flagrant 1 foul because the defender makes no play on the ball. It is not about the violence of the foul, but the actions that lead to the foul. So that part cannot be ignored. Now I do not have anyone ejected either. Just give Ts and move on. No punches and just people getting in the face of others.
Now this is something good. Yes fragrant foul, but there was tact used and it's clear he wasn't trying to hurt anyone. Then 3 players encircled him like they were on the block. No big deal give him or them T's. , but there is no way you can back talk Mullen in his own house, much less when his teammate Patrick steps in .Mullen played on that very floor as an All American And here we have students in action giving him lip. Whatever was said is moot, when the Dream team walk onto the floor you shut up and listen.
If you actually read the pinned comment or understood the purpose of the site that answers would be clear. This is a rules site. Most officials that would view this site are officials that never work a college game in their life. High School or National Federation Rules apply to them. The video is to show a situation and apply those rules. Again all clear if you actually read the purpose of the site.
@Roady: I answered the question. If you do not know the purpose of this website, that is not my issue at this point. Many people addressed that because they know the purpose and pointed it out to other comments. You can go elsewhere. The term Flagrant Foul in a college game has a different meaning for high school games and that was the point of the parentheses. If you are not bright enough to figure out that this is a college game, then not much I can do for you. Is that condescending enough for you?
Because this is an officiating rules site, where rules from different levels are discussed. The rules for high school and college have different terminology and application for this situation. So if you are not aware, this would be called an "Intentional Foul" at the high school level. At the college level, this would be called a "Flagrant Foul" (1 or 2). Much of the audience that would view this are not NCAA officials and they would only understand or apply the high school rules. So because it is harder to find adequate high school videos (especially when this was posted), that show extensive situations like these. Now if you had read the pinned comment or the description of the page, this would be much clearer to you and others. Clearly, many people attend this page that understands this fact and knows what this site is about. I am going to suspect you are not an official so this might have been a little lost on you. This was not posted for fan purposes or to highlight a fight. This is for officials so they understand how to apply the rules at the levels they work games. Thank you for your support of the page. ;)
I don't see what the problem is. He's not gonna let him score the easy lay up so he fouled him. It was just a hack. He didn't close line the guy or anything. Shoot if someone wants to hack me while I shoot I'll go to the line for two free points. It ain't that bad.
Interesting, Flagrant Foul 1 is a college ruling. That is what was called. The same act is an intentional foul in high school. Funny, people really cannot read or understand the purpose of this site.
Those are not High school teams they are D1 college. George Town continues to only recruit black players exclusively . Been doing this for a good 30 plus years now. The guy barely fouled the Georgetown player and that is the reaction you get from undiciplined players.
the guy who committed the initial foul showed EXTREME self control and sportsmanship...he did not react when attacked, held his hand up to say "yes, I did it" and then pulled his own players back when they were angry at the other team (for attacking HIM). Cudos.
He did not make a play on the ball, which causes the Flagrant Foul in the first place. FFs are not about the severity of contact. You cannot just grab someone that is trying to shoot. And the reason for the Flagrant Foul call.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos I think he meant the intentional (HS rules) foul wasn't anything for GT to get upset about. And it wasn't. What they called in that case was correct. This is one reason why I quit calling HS ball. No way to properly sort all that out without replay and it was beginning to happen more and more. Coaches coming on to the court, ostensibly to get their players, then talking to opposing players or to us. By the time we got everything sorted out, we sometimes couldn't remember what number we had the initial foul on or who did what after that. It was then I realized that was likely the idea. At least in football we can hit everyone with a USC and move on.
For one, it's not High School, it's D1 College Basketball. Two, it is an intentional foul, which in college is actually a Flagrant. Than all the extra stuff is Techs on th player 24 who shoves the player, each coach should get T'd up, and all players who left the bench should be ejected.
Very aware it is not high school. The videos are for officials to learn from situations that can happen to all of us. NCAA Rules apply to other levels of college ball like NAIA and JUCO as well.
Wtf?! Now all of basketball has gone soft. It was just a regular foul to prevent an and1 play. These people flaring up as if it was a Kurt Rambis foul. 😡
This was not an NBA game, this was a college game with non-professional players. How Kurt Rambis was fouled back in the day would be an easy ejection at all other levels now. Flagrant Fouls are not about the severity of the contact, but the kind of contact. You must play the ball or not just grab someone when you are behind them with no attempt to make a basketball play. This is why this kind of foul was called and probably for the reaction. The player clearly did that on purpose and tried to be coy by putting his arms up.
@@Anthony-hu3rj: This is the same title I have given for many videos where the rules on Flagrant Fouls were called on. Only people that do not know any thing about this site have an issue. It is obvious to anyone these are not high school players. Heck fans do not even know what the rules mean. So I am over it. It is like someone saying, "He did not mean to do that" as if that has anything to do with the rule. This is not for fanboys.
Just like that onlya and became a big trouble? What the heck hahaha. Then they called it monster croud? Hahaha must watch Filipino Bastketball mate. must watch hahaha
Just a bunch of amped-up former jocks reacting like schoolchildren. If they had real jobs and behaved that way, they'd be fired on the spot. But here they are seen as 'competitors'.
Flagrant Foul 1 is a college rule. Intentional Foul is a high school rule. Obviously, this is not a high school game if I am featuring the college rule. But the purpose of the site is to explain rules and let those that know the purpose of the site, that they are to be aware that the rules while called different things have the same basic application. This title is a reference to the rules that are applied, not the level that is being featured. That is why you should have read the pinned comment before commenting. IJS.
There is no defense in basketball-if you have good attackers .Denver won the best teams last year.pace and speed .the best teams could not parry them in speed and creativity. The coach did not understand what he owns in the team from the player.Instead of speeding up the game and organizing the defense better .Coach takes an older player to get into attack and defensive push. No attacks and defense is bad .The coach has to speed up the game-at the price of acknowledging the error in buying Milsap .This loses the championship and the chair
He barely hold on to his shoulder.. No shoving or pushing and immediately raised his hands saying ya I commited the foul.. This is just over reaction and tripping for no reason..
Yes Intentional Foul is a high school rule. A flagrant 1 foul is a college rule. Clearly you did not read through pinned comment or the purpose of this site. I never say where the game came from. Smart people can figure that out on their own.
@@chuckhoward143 Then you would know that the parentheses indicates the different language for the same action. Instead you think it means the players are in high school when the term Flagrant 1 Foul is clearly a college (and NBA) foul definition. If you forgot more basketball than me, you would know this off the bat. But clearly you forgot that part of basketball. High School has been using different language for this kind of foul for over a decade.
Not a ref, just makes me feel old to see Mullen and Ewing coaching. Georgetown player over reacted, intentional foul yes, but not flagrant. Much to do about nothing. Play ball and practice free throws!
It is a Flagrant Foul because there is no such foul called "Intentional Foul" in NCAA (anymore). It is a Flagrant 1 Foul which was called in this case. Actually, a Flagrant Foul (in NCAA) is basically the same foul as an Intentional Foul in high school (hence the title). Everyone overreacted and the foul has nothing to do with that reaction. The call was made already.
Peak was totally a cry cow baby player, it's just a minor foul, if he doesn't want to get that kind of foul he better quit playing basketball, basketball is contact sports.
That was hardly a flagrant foul. Like Patrick Ewing or Georgetown have any room to complain. Georgetown and Patrick Ewing was the dirtiest player in the big east.
The teams that left the big East (the catholic 7) should not have been allowed to keep the Big East name. Well what do you expect from a religious based school/ religion run by hypocrites(Sp)
I am not retitling this. Not at all. It is mostly fanboys that have an issue with this. Officials that know rules know what is being discussed. Not my fault people do not read the comments about this site or the other videos that are named nearly identically.
![1 Orc vs 7 Computers [4K]](/img/n.gif)
I am going to say this to all those that do not know the purpose of this site. This site is for officials learning rules. No one said that this was a high school game. It is clearly the Big East Tournament. But a Flagrant 1 Foul is the same as an Intentional Foul in the high school game. This is not a fanboy site, this is for officials to learn rules and interpretations as it relates to the game of basketball. This is kind of the purpose of the site (if you read the purpose of this site instead of just watching one video).
Thanks for this site. As a basketball official for 15 years, I learn a LOT by watching these videos.
Thank you very much. That is the purpose of the site.
Officiating Born the coaches and a few players should’ve been ejected
Darkraiii Did you even read the comment?
@@brianeaves8573 Me too. I try to get in at least 1 Basketball or Softball/Baseball video a day (if not more. )
Your title is written correctly and conveys the meaning you intended. I teach and see this happen all the time. People, instead of actually reading what is written make an assumption and then get frustrated when what they get is not what they thought it was supposed to be. They refuse to acknowledge that they screwed up since they are perfect and never make a mistake so obviously the mistake was yours.
Keep up the great work. I love your videos and learn a lot about the game from your posts. Thank you!
Then the Georgetown player that came in and pushed the St Johns player should've received a Flagrant 1 as his shove was intentional.
Bob Knight is lovin this intensity up in heaven! 😂
FF1 on original shot, then bench technicals offsetting (both indirect to head coaches) for players leaving no matter how many as long as they don't participate in any combative act. Then offsetting direct technicals to both head coaches for jawing. Resume with the FF1 shots to the fouled player (which they did) and throw in to offended team at the POI nearest the spot of the foul. (All done correctly)
Georgetown: Thats such a hard foul
1989 Bad Boy Pistons: Thats cute
really wasn't that bad of a foul...
Especially Ewing, a former NBA player, complaining about THAT foul. That’s a preseason foul in the 90’s. 😂
Ikr hopefully everyone calms down
Number 0 was hugging Marcus Lovett and saying we cool 😂
Ima Big10 Boy Midwest Kid but Damn The Big East was fun to watch back in the day Lol I got goosebumps watching this lol like a flashback of 80s 90s Big East
One last thing I don't think I've ever seen Mullins Look Angry As a Player Lol jeez he was Raging LOL
White 3 gets an intentional foul for sure. Blue 24 and 42 each should get a technical foul for shoving. Blue 24 will shoot two free throws, then any White player can shoot 4 free throws. White throw in from midline.
When does the Big East torny start this year?
Wow talk about an overreaction by Georgetown players.
Ikr hopefully everyone calms down
Attitude reflects leadership.
That's exactly what it is. Sadly it's a cycle. Coaches were brought up in the same type of bullshit and thus they turn out like this.
If you go a Flagrant on the original foul on the St. John's player, it is definitely a Flagrant 1 because it was unnecessary but not necessarily excessive.
T on 24 of Georgetown for one shove, didn't get a clear look, but you could call a second T on Georgetown 42 for another.
T and immediate toss for both coaches for almost starting a major altercation.
After all the FT's, check alternate possession because both teams got T's.
I don't know how either of those Georgetown players didn't get a technical foul for pushing the St. John's player into the crowd. I'm truly baffled by that.
Hardly a foul... nothing worth losing tempers over...
AdamCarl7 Never said it wasn't a foul, I just said it wasn't that hard of a foul for everyone to go at each other, the guy landed on his feet, just shoot the free throws and play the game, we've all seen worse haha
If it were the neck, that's a Flagrant 2 regardless.
I think I saw shoulder more than anything.
AdamCarl7 He grabbed his shoulder, calm down
AdamCarl7 you’re soft.
Of course it was intended, stops team from scoring 2, now he gets free throws if he misses no points scored. You see teams do that a lot towards the end of the game. Good defense, cheap, but good. Just a way to try to get the ball back without the other team scoring.
Exactly. Shaq got it all the time because he sucks at free throws.
I love me some Chris Mullin old school player not taking any shit as a coach. Played in an era that the NBA was actually entertaining.
is that Milos Rionic younger brother
who spotted bill murray at 0:57 ?
That was his LAST Big East Tournament. He will be at the ACC Tournament from now on.
@@brucemercer7753: I think he had or has a son coaching college basketball and was at the time in the Big East. His son at least recently was coaching at Louisville (I looked it up).
lol that was the sofest foul i ever seen.
This separate today's players from the 90's... Jordan would've said, good foul and kept it moving!
Even their foul is more interesting than NBA
1st I am a Ref and just subscribed. But my question has NOTHING to do with the rules.
Is Jon Thompson the 3rd an Assistant Coach at Georgetown now? or is he an Assistant Coach at St Johns? Or is he just there as a Fan and hanging out with his Dad?
I know Patrick Ewing is the new Head Coach at Georgetown and Chris Mullens is the Head Coach at St Johns. Good to see those 2 back in the game somehow.
I don't think most former players end up being very good coaches. But these 2 are both VERY SMART former players and I think they will both make it.
JT3 was fired by georgetown, and Pat Sr. was their subsequent hire.
This was 2 seasons ago and the GT staff is different now. Patrick Ewing Sr. is now the coach and his son at the time was an assistant as he played for JT3 while at GT.
I don't get what the Georgetown player was bitching about. He knows he's going to get fouled there. It could've been a thousand times worse
The guy who committed the foul who puts his hands and gets pushed, and the opposing team who shoves him, If I was on the guy who put his hands up, I am socking the player who pushed him no matter what his race or gender. I garauntee the other team would behave the same way.
So here's what I got, I've got a personal foul in the St. John's player, he wasn't excessive or malicious, and I don't think it warranted a flagrant foul. After the play, and in the dead ball situation, I have fighting fouls on 24th from Georgetown and 42 from Georgetown, and they're both gone. Gone. I have double technicals on both coaches, and they're both gone. I think that about covers it.
It is a flagrant 1 foul because the defender makes no play on the ball. It is not about the violence of the foul, but the actions that lead to the foul. So that part cannot be ignored. Now I do not have anyone ejected either. Just give Ts and move on. No punches and just people getting in the face of others.
Anyone who plays knows that at times you need to foul. This was not a bad foul. The reaction was unnecessary.
They need to watch Oakley, Shaq and sir Charles fouls in the 90s. That's all I'm gonna say.
This is college basketball. They are not pros. Has nothing to do what happened in the NBA back in the day. Rules are different here as well.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos mfs always gotta take the opportunity to say the 90s were way better and shit
Move your feet and you won't need to cheat. People with no game will say "not so bad" bc their game depends on fouling.
Now this is something good. Yes fragrant foul, but there was tact used and it's clear he wasn't trying to hurt anyone. Then 3 players encircled him like they were on the block. No big deal give him or them T's. , but there is no way you can back talk Mullen in his own house, much less when his teammate Patrick steps in .Mullen played on that very floor as an All American And here we have students in action giving him lip. Whatever was said is moot, when the Dream team walk onto the floor you shut up and listen.
Where was the dirty play? I've seen harder screens go uncalled..
The play has nothing to do with being "dirty." The foul is classified as Flagrant and has a specific penalty.
Justin brownlee former player of St. John?
just so I know, what is the HS in the title of this video short for?
If you actually read the pinned comment or understood the purpose of the site that answers would be clear. This is a rules site. Most officials that would view this site are officials that never work a college game in their life. High School or National Federation Rules apply to them. The video is to show a situation and apply those rules. Again all clear if you actually read the purpose of the site.
@Roady: I answered the question. If you do not know the purpose of this website, that is not my issue at this point. Many people addressed that because they know the purpose and pointed it out to other comments. You can go elsewhere. The term Flagrant Foul in a college game has a different meaning for high school games and that was the point of the parentheses. If you are not bright enough to figure out that this is a college game, then not much I can do for you. Is that condescending enough for you?
@Roady shutup bitch he explained next time read u ignorant bastard
Why does the title say HS?
Because this is an officiating rules site, where rules from different levels are discussed. The rules for high school and college have different terminology and application for this situation. So if you are not aware, this would be called an "Intentional Foul" at the high school level. At the college level, this would be called a "Flagrant Foul" (1 or 2). Much of the audience that would view this are not NCAA officials and they would only understand or apply the high school rules. So because it is harder to find adequate high school videos (especially when this was posted), that show extensive situations like these.
Now if you had read the pinned comment or the description of the page, this would be much clearer to you and others. Clearly, many people attend this page that understands this fact and knows what this site is about. I am going to suspect you are not an official so this might have been a little lost on you. This was not posted for fan purposes or to highlight a fight. This is for officials so they understand how to apply the rules at the levels they work games.
Thank you for your support of the page. ;)
Who won this game? That really determines who wins the argument lol
0:38--RED ALERT
I don't see what the problem is. He's not gonna let him score the easy lay up so he fouled him. It was just a hack. He didn't close line the guy or anything. Shoot if someone wants to hack me while I shoot I'll go to the line for two free points. It ain't that bad.
Hmm? Where was the "foul?"
When he grabbed both of his shoulders when he was shooting at the basket. Kind of have to play the ball too.
That foul wasn’t that bad. I’ve seen much worse. The players overreacted
I would have called technical fouls on both teams
Man those are some bad ass high school teams to have NBA legends Chris Mullin and Patrick Ewing coaching them
Interesting, Flagrant Foul 1 is a college ruling. That is what was called. The same act is an intentional foul in high school. Funny, people really cannot read or understand the purpose of this site.
Oh, and they are not in the NBA. :D
Those are not High school teams they are D1 college.
George Town continues to only recruit black players exclusively . Been doing this for a good 30 plus years now.
The guy barely fouled the Georgetown player and that is the reaction you get from undiciplined players.
@@chrispewitt1411Ok so not only is that statement is very false (I.e. Gheorghe Mureșan Jr.), but also seems… more than a little racist
42 should have been ejected for the shove.
Weak ass foul… huge overaction!!
the guy who committed the initial foul showed EXTREME self control and sportsmanship...he did not react when attacked, held his hand up to say "yes, I did it" and then pulled his own players back when they were angry at the other team (for attacking HIM). Cudos.
Man, that foul was nothing. Are you serious, they made this a big deal? WOWwwWW!😂
He did not make a play on the ball, which causes the Flagrant Foul in the first place. FFs are not about the severity of contact. You cannot just grab someone that is trying to shoot. And the reason for the Flagrant Foul call.
That was barely a tap. And then no foul on 24 or 42? Just wow.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos I think he meant the intentional (HS rules) foul wasn't anything for GT to get upset about. And it wasn't. What they called in that case was correct. This is one reason why I quit calling HS ball. No way to properly sort all that out without replay and it was beginning to happen more and more. Coaches coming on to the court, ostensibly to get their players, then talking to opposing players or to us. By the time we got everything sorted out, we sometimes couldn't remember what number we had the initial foul on or who did what after that. It was then I realized that was likely the idea. At least in football we can hit everyone with a USC and move on.
I'm not seeing anything there that warranted the over the top reaction. There must have been a lot of chipiness that lead up to this.
It is a traditional rivalry. That is all you need sometimes.
Over reaction!!! He touched him not hammer him!!! GTFOH Gtown #0
Hardly worth the reaction. He didn't go down, or get hurt.
Lord-Peak SO OVERREACTED
HS shouldn't be televised
Retrovertigo this is a college game
it may have been a flagrant foul...but not a bad one at all.....the st johns player did the right thing by not retaliating against the upset gt player
For one, it's not High School, it's D1 College Basketball. Two, it is an intentional foul, which in college is actually a Flagrant. Than all the extra stuff is Techs on th player 24 who shoves the player, each coach should get T'd up, and all players who left the bench should be ejected.
Very aware it is not high school. The videos are for officials to learn from situations that can happen to all of us. NCAA Rules apply to other levels of college ball like NAIA and JUCO as well.
Fucking DUH!!!! Idiot!!! Learn to Read!!! 🙄🙄🙄
Well there is a game called Hockey.
Wtf?! Now all of basketball has gone soft. It was just a regular foul to prevent an and1 play. These people flaring up as if it was a Kurt Rambis foul. 😡
This was not an NBA game, this was a college game with non-professional players. How Kurt Rambis was fouled back in the day would be an easy ejection at all other levels now. Flagrant Fouls are not about the severity of the contact, but the kind of contact. You must play the ball or not just grab someone when you are behind them with no attempt to make a basketball play. This is why this kind of foul was called and probably for the reaction. The player clearly did that on purpose and tried to be coy by putting his arms up.
How the hell was that a flagrant foul?
HS? Them look like grown men 😂
Never said it was a high school game. Applying high school rules and college rules to this situation. I guess you did not read the site's purpose?
@@OfficiatingBornVideos
Title badly written. Get over yourself.
@@Anthony-hu3rj: This is the same title I have given for many videos where the rules on Flagrant Fouls were called on. Only people that do not know any thing about this site have an issue. It is obvious to anyone these are not high school players. Heck fans do not even know what the rules mean. So I am over it. It is like someone saying, "He did not mean to do that" as if that has anything to do with the rule. This is not for fanboys.
@@OfficiatingBornVideos It is still wrongly written if people do not understand what you meant to say.
Actually the people that follow the page and are officials are not having any issues. I'm going to assume you are not a basketball official.
all ball teaches is Aggression
Just like that onlya and became a big trouble? What the heck hahaha. Then they called it monster croud? Hahaha must watch Filipino Bastketball mate. must watch hahaha
Just a bunch of amped-up former jocks reacting like schoolchildren. If they had real jobs and behaved that way, they'd be fired on the spot. But here they are seen as 'competitors'.
The first one
is not high school
Flagrant Foul 1 is a college rule. Intentional Foul is a high school rule. Obviously, this is not a high school game if I am featuring the college rule. But the purpose of the site is to explain rules and let those that know the purpose of the site, that they are to be aware that the rules while called different things have the same basic application. This title is a reference to the rules that are applied, not the level that is being featured. That is why you should have read the pinned comment before commenting. IJS.
There is no defense in basketball-if you have good attackers .Denver won the best teams last year.pace and speed .the best teams could not parry them in speed and creativity. The coach did not understand what he owns in the team from the player.Instead of speeding up the game and organizing the defense better .Coach takes an older player to get into attack and defensive push. No attacks and defense is bad .The coach has to speed up the game-at the price of acknowledging the error in buying Milsap .This loses the championship and the chair
Dude got beat, just took the foul instead. Yeah flagrant bc of where his hands are but not a big deal. Let the refs make their call and play on.
Intentional yes. Hard foul and worth a fight or techs? No.
He barely hold on to his shoulder.. No shoving or pushing and immediately raised his hands saying ya I commited the foul.. This is just over reaction and tripping for no reason..
Georgetown, nothing new here.
This is a college game...title misleads you!
Thanks, I would have never know.
Those Christians went cRaaZyyyy!
catholics*
High School?
Yes Intentional Foul is a high school rule. A flagrant 1 foul is a college rule. Clearly you did not read through pinned comment or the purpose of this site. I never say where the game came from. Smart people can figure that out on their own.
Smart people don’t need to mention high school because they already know the difference, cupcake
You know the different application between the levels? If that was the case you would know the different language.
I think I’ve forgotten more about basketball than you know so I’m well aware of levels
@@chuckhoward143 Then you would know that the parentheses indicates the different language for the same action. Instead you think it means the players are in high school when the term Flagrant 1 Foul is clearly a college (and NBA) foul definition. If you forgot more basketball than me, you would know this off the bat. But clearly you forgot that part of basketball. High School has been using different language for this kind of foul for over a decade.
Thats not high school has to be college
Duh!!!! Did you read the pinned comment?
not high school...
Yes that is why it says Flagrant Foul (Intentional Foul in high school) which is a college rule.
No H.S game! Butt go to see the old school days attitudes 😋
I did not say it was a high school game. ;)
Not a ref, just makes me feel old to see Mullen and Ewing coaching. Georgetown player over reacted, intentional foul yes, but not flagrant. Much to do about nothing. Play ball and practice free throws!
It is a Flagrant Foul because there is no such foul called "Intentional Foul" in NCAA (anymore). It is a Flagrant 1 Foul which was called in this case. Actually, a Flagrant Foul (in NCAA) is basically the same foul as an Intentional Foul in high school (hence the title).
Everyone overreacted and the foul has nothing to do with that reaction. The call was made already.
That wasnt a flagrant foul !!!ridiculous
It was intentional. In college, intentionals are flagrant 1.
Easy call didnt make a play on the basketball
Basketball is a contact sport, and this is the result of it. Flagrant foul and it leads to nonsense.
That foul was Was barely that though Lol that's just 2 teams waiting for any little thing I mean my God 😆
white dude barely held him down a-s come push him twice that's a more aggresive
its a cheap shot that player 0 Is just a big cry baby
Bunch of babies.
Peak was totally a cry cow baby player, it's just a minor foul, if he doesn't want to get that kind of foul he better quit playing basketball, basketball is contact sports.
Thats wasnt a bad foul. Or hard foul. Smfh
Doesn't have to be. It follows the definition of a Flagrant foul.
L for thinking these were high school teams
Or an L for not reading the site's purpose. Never said these were high school teams. But that would require reading the purpose of the site.
Thompson III...Ewing Jr? how do you spell nepotism? wow.
James Harden got 4 free throws after this.
HS too soft now a days.... isn't a bad foul you're just too soft to receive that sports.
its not highschool bitch
This was a weak flagrant
OMG. ref you have to call Flagrant Foul 10, so hard. so hard. or call 911 for that foul.
That was hardly a flagrant foul. Like Patrick Ewing or Georgetown have any room to complain. Georgetown and Patrick Ewing was the dirtiest player in the big east.
boring no punches were thrown!!
Damn, 25 year old high school players!
Is flagrant 1 foul a high school rule?
soft foul
Hard foul?! Oh my.. over reacting dude of the year..
Not a hard foul, but it is the clear cut definition of an intentional (flagrant 1) foul.
Peak is over acting..
Wasn’t even a hard foul stop crying
That wasn't even that hard of a foul. A bunch of overreaction escalated that
Game is soft
This is a college game
Yes, kind of obvious if you read the pinned comment or the actual title of the video. Reading is fundamental.
The teams that left the big East (the catholic 7) should not have been allowed to keep the Big East name. Well what do you expect from a religious based school/ religion run by hypocrites(Sp)
Soft fowl. Georgetown overreacted
HS? Uhhhhhhh...
Just ran past the pinned comment I see.
This is a horrible title. Really retitle this
I am not retitling this. Not at all. It is mostly fanboys that have an issue with this. Officials that know rules know what is being discussed. Not my fault people do not read the comments about this site or the other videos that are named nearly identically.