The Sikh Empire was formed to fight invaders. Ex: Mughals and Abdalis from Afghanistan. It was powerful during Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s time. After his death, there were traitors as well as infighting going on. That’s how the British won against the Sikh Empire.
With the worlds history I'm pretty sure your ancestors took from others what wasn't theirs even if it meant over the corpses of the owners. Russians in Ukraine for example even take the toilets sometimes, dishwashers, etc. and just about anything they can loot that is of value. World history is what it is, you got to hand it to the British that most of these relics are better taken care of than they would be if they were returned to the country of origin so why not display them, they are meant to be seen else they will be forgotten and slowly disappear. If British for whatever reason would return all the relics that are not of British origin then pretty much all museums etc. worldwide should do the same, no hypocracy.
Only if hindus were able to fight off the east india company, this would have never happened. Its your doing. You hindus didn't learn from the mistakes of Rana Sanga.
People saying that these artifacts are looted and should be returned will be happy to know that they are in the hands of a Sikh owned private collection. It should also be noted that in case of repatriation, the majority of the empire and its artifacts were produced in modern Pakistani territory.
The Sikh Empire was formed to fight invaders. Ex: Mughals and Abdalis from Afghanistan. It was powerful during Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s time. After his death, there were traitors as well as infighting going on. That’s how the British won against the Sikh Empire.
Looters displaying their loot with pride.
Have you visited any exhibition in India ?
With the worlds history I'm pretty sure your ancestors took from others what wasn't theirs even if it meant over the corpses of the owners. Russians in Ukraine for example even take the toilets sometimes, dishwashers, etc. and just about anything they can loot that is of value.
World history is what it is, you got to hand it to the British that most of these relics are better taken care of than they would be if they were returned to the country of origin so why not display them, they are meant to be seen else they will be forgotten and slowly disappear. If British for whatever reason would return all the relics that are not of British origin then pretty much all museums etc. worldwide should do the same, no hypocracy.
Of course Veere
Only if hindus were able to fight off the east india company, this would have never happened. Its your doing.
You hindus didn't learn from the mistakes of Rana Sanga.
@@BAJWA96
Isi liye toh history padna jaroori hai khalistani gawaar.
Baat pata nahi uchal ke beech mein aa jata hai.
Baith neechey!
Looks like an amazing show of treasures on display there. The sword sounds pretty cool...
Britain still remembers their proud moment of 200 years Colonial Rule over the indian people -
America is trying to do the same now
90 Percent of the sepoys who served in their Army were Natives of India.
Very sad to this as an Indian. All of these should be in India not UK.
The picture on your thumbnail is of Maharaja Sher Singh, son of Maharaja Ranjit Singh
People saying that these artifacts are looted and should be returned will be happy to know that they are in the hands of a Sikh owned private collection. It should also be noted that in case of repatriation, the majority of the empire and its artifacts were produced in modern Pakistani territory.
Where is Kohinoor?
You mean looted jwel from india , specially Kohinoor snacched from little child
kohinoor is a cursed gem we don't want it back.
Whatever the case, the place of UK royal is under one of the million diamonds India produced. Haha