@@Patrick-wn6uj Core losses are not produced in the wires, but within the core itself. The active power for that is then supplied from the windings, but that's it.
@@diegoferreyra9004 No because the voltage doesn't cause the losses. This is why we have high voltage transmission. The lesser the current, the lesser the losses.
@@benlivingstone8272 The phenomenon is different. Higher voltage lines reduce series losses related to I^2 (as long as R at least stays the same). Here we are talking about magneticc core losses, related to hystheresis and eddy currents, both depending on the flux value, and the voltage applied has directly to do with the flux in the magnetic circuit (Faraday-Lenz).
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm having a great time watching your insightful and easy to understand lectures. Thanks alot!
الله يعطيك العافية شرح مبسط ومفصل
perfect lecture
Shouldn't core losses be proportional to the voltage squared?
@@Patrick-wn6uj Core losses are not produced in the wires, but within the core itself. The active power for that is then supplied from the windings, but that's it.
@@diegoferreyra9004 No because the voltage doesn't cause the losses. This is why we have high voltage transmission. The lesser the current, the lesser the losses.
@@benlivingstone8272 The phenomenon is different. Higher voltage lines reduce series losses related to I^2 (as long as R at least stays the same). Here we are talking about magneticc core losses, related to hystheresis and eddy currents, both depending on the flux value, and the voltage applied has directly to do with the flux in the magnetic circuit (Faraday-Lenz).