Indeed the current will be different. In fact, it is a simplification which has not been said in the video. We refer to the primary side as the source side and as "secondary" as the side in which the consumer's load is connected. For these reasons, we can't simplify and put the impedance of the secondary directly in series to the primary but can do so for the primary, which explains why the shunt has been moved to the left and not to the right.
The magnetizing current is very small compared the load currents, this makes it negligible and hence the shunt can be removed entirely, since this is an approximate circuit. What we want to analyze in the model is the impedance(resistance and reactance) which we know to be what affects the transformer in this case.
@@swan_lounge IMO step 3 is unnecessary if the professor intends to arrange it that way. Just tell us directly that the magnetizing current can be ignored.
If this is a step down transformer, for example a =10 as in the earlier video, then Vs should equal Vp/10. However in this lecture on the simplified model it was determined that the reflected secondary voltage is a*Vs, which is actually the equal to Vp. Seems if the transformer is a step down type, the output should be Vp/a. I am confused what this model accomplishes.
Your videos are truly amazing! I can only hope that you upload more electrical/electronics videos
Im very privileged and honored to be one of your students you have taught us well Prof.lutfi thank you so much.
Eng. Aws. It is really nice to hear from you!!
Fantastic videos! I love your delivery
Thank you so much, I love your english videos so much sir, Thanks a lot.
why shunt components were moved? the current will be different if you move the shunt components. explain why
Indeed the current will be different. In fact, it is a simplification which has not been said in the video. We refer to the primary side as the source side and as "secondary" as the side in which the consumer's load is connected. For these reasons, we can't simplify and put the impedance of the secondary directly in series to the primary but can do so for the primary, which explains why the shunt has been moved to the left and not to the right.
thanks. I wish you also do autotransformer.
Thank you sir, this videos are amazing.
great videos! Thanks!
you save my course
A Big thanks !!!!
Simplifying the transformer? More like "Superb videos; I hope to see more of 'em!"
Add the series and move the shunt??????? That changes the current(everything). Please explain
The magnetizing current is very small compared the load currents, this makes it negligible and hence the shunt can be removed entirely, since this is an approximate circuit. What we want to analyze in the model is the impedance(resistance and reactance) which we know to be what affects the transformer in this case.
@@swan_lounge IMO step 3 is unnecessary if the professor intends to arrange it that way. Just tell us directly that the magnetizing current can be ignored.
Please solve examples. On equivalent circuit
Thank you sir!
If this is a step down transformer, for example a =10 as in the earlier video, then Vs should equal Vp/10. However in this lecture on the simplified model it was determined that the reflected secondary voltage is a*Vs, which is actually the equal to Vp. Seems if the transformer is a step down type, the output should be Vp/a. I am confused what this model accomplishes.
that is the primary winding dude
idk why he doesnt fucking draw the ideal transformer at the end