Is Geothermal Heating and Cooling Worth the Cost? Heat Pumps Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3.3K

  • @UndecidedMF
    @UndecidedMF  3 ปีที่แล้ว +218

    Do you want a geothermal heating/cooling setup for your home? I know I do. And to learn more about geothermal energy, check out my other video on the topic: th-cam.com/video/-HhdR9YRGxI/w-d-xo.html

    • @roxter299roxter7
      @roxter299roxter7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Could you do a show on combination solar panels? I hear they could be 80% more efficient than regular solar panels

    • @homegrown241
      @homegrown241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Here in The Netherlands we have a company called Solar Freezer. This is what i am getting installed this summer. You should check this out

    • @ZookeeperJohnG
      @ZookeeperJohnG 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      YES :D

    • @TarSands403
      @TarSands403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you list where you get the sources from these videos??

    • @williamclark6466
      @williamclark6466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, I would love to switch to GSHP & hybrid/combination solar panels & wind, with energy storage, vehicle charging, etc. I just need to find the money.

  • @randyjordan6548
    @randyjordan6548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +408

    Converted my home to vertical loop GSHP system when I bought it 23 years ago. The previous owner was spending thousands per year on propane and that cost completely went away while my electricity costs were actually less. However, I did have several maintenance issues in the first few years that made me question my decision. After switching service companies things have run smoothly for several years. Can’t emphasize enough how important it is to contract with an experienced company with a long track record in this industry.

    • @Angeloflight444
      @Angeloflight444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Thank you for your input, good to know. I hope everything is fine now. Cheers.

    • @rf7192
      @rf7192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "The previous owner was spending thousands per year on propane"? Thousands?

    • @TheRealFOSFOR
      @TheRealFOSFOR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@rf7192 I am using thousands on oil every year. I'd say... about 1k every 3-4 months give or take. I've seriously thought about geothermal in the past but I once saw a video where they compared geothermal and "air to water" heat pumps.. the upfront cost was way higher on geo and the payback time was still almost the same on both.

    • @DSesignD
      @DSesignD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This. I'm shopping for a contractor and service plan. One contractor (who doesn't do residential anymore) strongly recommended against almost all of the other contractors in the area because he had kept getting hired to go and fix their botched jobs. After digging around and reaching out to others with GSHP systems, I found similar bad experiences in cases where the system was either improperly installed or given maintenance by inexperienced people.

    • @DSesignD
      @DSesignD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@rf7192 in my area it's not uncommon at all to pay thousands per year on oil or propane.

  • @acedrew1
    @acedrew1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +784

    My house has had a ground source heat pump (GSHP) for 18 years now. It works really great as I don't have any natural gas connected to my house. Also I live in Edmonton Canada which gets crazy cold in the winter. I have a closed vertical loop system

    • @gregholloway2656
      @gregholloway2656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I’m in south east BC and am considering a gshp retrofit. I’m curious, how deep are your vertical loops?

    • @The_k81
      @The_k81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hey Andrew, what's your insulation/envelope like? I'm in YYC looking at a retrofit.

    • @acedrew1
      @acedrew1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@gregholloway2656 I think mine are around 200ft deep

    • @gregholloway2656
      @gregholloway2656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@acedrew1 thanks Andrew!

    • @AndroidGuru13
      @AndroidGuru13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      How is it heating up your house? Do you still need to run a heater/furnace to top up the heat?
      I understand that the ground is cooler in the summers and how it cools but not how (much) it heats. When outside is -20 i presume that the ground is still kind of cool.... but now I read its 200ft deep, I wonder how warm the ground would be.

  • @colincameron1878
    @colincameron1878 2 ปีที่แล้ว +319

    Warning: I invested the "Ferrari" of geo thermal systems a few years ago at a cost of about $40,000K for a closed vertical loop system. The system worked great providing cheap heating and cooling for about 3 years, and then just stopped. When they came to investigate, apparently the pipes had snapped because the bedrock rock under ground had shifted. To repair would have required a reinstallation of the pipes which would almost have been as pricey as the original installation, so needless to say I ended up getting a high efficiency propane system. I also was told this is a common problem with these systems, and found many horror stories on line. I wish I had known this before the original installation. Buyer beware.

    • @WT7005
      @WT7005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I wonder if more flexible tubing would help prevent the pipe snapping you experienced. I suppose if too flexible, the hose could crimp and impede the coolant flow.

    • @danielsen116
      @danielsen116 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Sorry to hear this, someone really tried to take advantage of you. Full re-installation wouldn’t have been necessary.

    • @irregulargamer1352
      @irregulargamer1352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@WT7005 it probably would have gotten pinched and stopped regardless

    • @holger_p
      @holger_p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      It's a warning valid for areas with tectonic activities. But it should have been known in advance, and the flat collectors should have got preference over a deep whole.

    • @Grubiantoll
      @Grubiantoll 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aither geologist fucked up or they didnt employ one, in aither case that fuckup should be on them

  • @joestallings6993
    @joestallings6993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +731

    I had a house built in 1985. There was a 50% tax credit at the time, which brought the price down to be comparable to a conventional air-to-air heat pump. The entire system was $7800 before the tax credit. The closed loop, vertically drilled system worked great. I'm amazed this technology still isn't more common.

    • @el_presidente
      @el_presidente 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yi

    • @ScarletFlames1
      @ScarletFlames1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Holy shit, my grandmothers 4 bedroom+gigantic livingroom+bedroom sized kitchen monster of a house has an HVAC, their replacement HVAC cost them 6,000 NIS (roughly 1800 USD) and it was one of the more overpowered systems for their house.
      Why are HVAC systems so cheap here in israel when the cost of housing is through the roof? Fucking greedy assholes bubbling the housing market, I hope they all get cancer so they have something useful to use all that money they're sucking out of us.

    • @warbot2544
      @warbot2544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@ScarletFlames1 same applies to land thieves as well 🔥

    • @supermemememe605
      @supermemememe605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ScarletFlames1 מה קורה אחי חחחחח

    • @MrRadzaboy
      @MrRadzaboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well someone has to make money.

  • @ppipowerclass
    @ppipowerclass 3 ปีที่แล้ว +519

    Ok, so I can answer the " how does it hold up " question. We put a geothermal furnace in at my dads house nearly 20 years ago now. We did it our self, all for under $5,000. It has worked perfectly, with no issues, since we installed it. It has RV antifreeze in it. The line is 6 feet down. It has worked excellent, and that is in northern Ohio ( some pretty cold winters! ).

    • @rosstemple7617
      @rosstemple7617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Can it be hooked up to an already existing HVAC system or do you have to have a special system?

    • @assassinlexx1993
      @assassinlexx1993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rosstemple7617
      Phone your local Hvc to find out.

    • @shirolee
      @shirolee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      In those 20 years, how much maintenance or repair have you had to do to the system? Thanks

    • @peepiepo
      @peepiepo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      This isn't "geothermal", it's ground source heat pump

    • @wuhanbiruSux
      @wuhanbiruSux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@peepiepo anything from the ground is geo. you didn't watch the video. yes the geothermal you are thinking of is the Yellowstone geysers. but not all ground is that hot.

  • @tomrecny6437
    @tomrecny6437 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I converted from an oil fired hot water system to geothermal 8 yrs ago. I live in a cold climate, ADKs northern NY. It’s worked very well. After 30% tax credit, system cost for 5Ton unit was $20K and has yielded a roughly 9% ROR. Since the savings aren’t taxed that’s equivalent to a 12% pretax investment. Since I have a large 4 acre backyard, I have one long 450’ loop with outflow on one side and return on the other, 5 ft below ground that was trenched, laid & covered in one day for $3,000. The larger part of our cost was installing an air duct system in our two story home. I later installed a 9300 KWH solar array on my barn roof with 55% cost covered by State & Fed incentive. Our 3,000 sft home is now 100% electric heat, cool, hot water at under $100/ mo. Aside from the great savings and payback, both systems add a lot to property value.

  • @oggyreidmore
    @oggyreidmore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    You could use solar thermal on the roof and geothermal under the home to not only heat and cool the place and provide hot water, but also to generate the electricity needed to run the system. If the home is built with proper orientation to the sun and proper insulation, you begin with a home that requires only 15% of the energy a normal home requires. A Stirling generator that takes advantage of the heat differentials could possibly generate this low power requirement and the home could heat and cool itself automatically without a grid connection at all.

    • @benteich
      @benteich 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is what I was thinking of doing when I build my barn house.

    • @minglim-pollard1167
      @minglim-pollard1167 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      May I suggest if possible refrain from installing solar panels onto roofing elements, for the following matrix of reasons, roof design weight distribution coefficients, engineering and consenting processes, roof maintenance access which you will be faced with plus the cleaning to ensure the solar absorbtiton reflective qualities, if space provides consider mounting the solar panels within a frame that is positioned on a ground based location where you will have safe and ease of access to enable you to clean the dust and air laden contaminants from the panels. Penetrating the roofing fabric with holding down connection systems during the panel install is less than desirable , regardless of the quantify or quality of the sealants and proprietory mounting gaskets. Solar heating is environmentally seductive but one must weight up, how much electrical power can I purchase versus the capital cost outlay and financial return period, depreciation, maintenance, and replacement plus not all solar systems are created equally, usually around 10 years, not forgetting the quality of the installation process, how long does one intend living at the property and last but not least of all, the potential of a legally initiated all season all weather disolution court order placed over the roof of the house. As with the preceding and most decision making processes, the usual defence, never happened before and never saw it coming!

    • @benteich
      @benteich 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@minglim-pollard1167 that is actually a very solid point. I appreciate your feedback and will definitely keep that in mind if and when I ever find a lot to build my barn house. Much appreciated.

    • @oggyreidmore
      @oggyreidmore 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@minglim-pollard1167 I didn't need a novel to tell me "be cautious when you do things".

  • @steveseidel9967
    @steveseidel9967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I put in a new geothermal system a few years ago. Upfront cost was high. About $32k for a vertical loop and a high end Waterfurnace 7 series. Initial savings were a little over $2k per year. With oil prices higher now, savings are at least $2.5k per year. At the time, tax credits we’re higher, so my break even cost was 5 to 6 years when you subtract the cost of a conventional system I would have bought and the tax credits.
    One thing this video doesn’t cover are the comfort advantages. For starters, the system is extremely quiet. You really never hear it. Instead, it runs pretty steadily at a very power efficient rate. So, there are no swings in temperature that you have in more conventional systems. Your house is just the temperature you want. You never have to even think about it. Oh, and because of the desuperheater, we effectively get free hot water during the summer months.
    If anyone is “on the fence” and seriously considering a geothermal system, I would strongly recommend they get one. I’m very happy with my system both for the efficiency and cost savings, but also for the comfort.

    • @litoaykiu
      @litoaykiu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How deep did you have to drill and what was the temp coming out of the ground?

    • @steveseidel9967
      @steveseidel9967 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@litoaykiu They drilled 2 boreholes that were each 300 feet deep for our loop. I don’t know the exact temperature of the water.

    • @litoaykiu
      @litoaykiu ปีที่แล้ว

      @@steveseidel9967 Thanks!

    • @jku72
      @jku72 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      With a life span of ten years, a replacement cost of the compressors between 8 and 15k, and electricity prices now at 30cents a kwhr, the comfort is nice but not in way cost effective.
      My geo unit was installed in 2012, and has an average annual cost (including installation and maintenance) is $17,000 per year. Anyone can decide for themselves if that is cost effective.

    • @steveseidel9967
      @steveseidel9967 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jku72 Nobody is spending $17k per year. That’s absurd. Also, more than half the cost was the drilling for me. My ground loop has a 60 year warranty.
      The price of a new compressor is more like $3k. The prices you mention are to replace the entire unit. Also, the entire unit is indoor so it’s not exposed to the elements like a traditional system, so your average lifespan isn’t correct either.

  • @stevevet3652
    @stevevet3652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My wife and I have been looking into a Geothermal heat pump system but couldn't find an explanation to suit our understanding of how they work. Now we know. Thank you.

  • @MrDeikas
    @MrDeikas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +327

    Combined with phovoltaic panels, geothermal heating/cooling is one of the greenest and cheapest home temperature management systems. Great video, great topic

    • @ThomasBomb45
      @ThomasBomb45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      You can even use excess solar to store thermal energy in your house, i.e. making it a degree or two warmer (in heat mode) or lower (in AC mode), lowering the amount of electricity needed during that afternoon/evening spike in electricity

    • @Competitiveforlolz
      @Competitiveforlolz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@ThomasBomb45 or warm your boiler water to a higher temperature so you need to heat it less over night.

    • @JurassicJolts
      @JurassicJolts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Do you mean operating costs or total cost of ownership?

    • @excitedbox5705
      @excitedbox5705 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Solar is actually just as bad if not worse for global warming. All energy = heat and solar is absorbing sun energy that would get reflected back into space. Capturing that heat (in a very inefficient conversion non the less) it adds heat to the closed system that is no longer radiated into space. That is what is meant when people talk about the albedo of the planet.
      If we want to use solar energy we need to build even more systems that would reduce the amount of sunlight that is absorbed by our atmosphere. Either increasing the amount of ice, building sun shades, reflectors or increasing cloud cover (which also absorbs some sunlight)
      People need to be careful, because both sides spread a lot of propaganda and in a few years you will be told by the big polluters how they were right all along.
      Geothermal, Nuclear, Hydro, and ocean hydro are the real energy sources we need to focus on. In addition, we need to do the things I suggested above to reduce the amount of sunlight, We have already lost so much ice, that even going energy neutral would not be enough at this point to stop global warming.

    • @AdaDenali
      @AdaDenali 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@excitedbox5705 I really doubt we are putting in enough solar panels to substantially increase global albedo, especially if you are putting them on top of an asphalt shingle roof that is about as dark as the panels.

  • @FraserFulton22
    @FraserFulton22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    As somebody who installs geothermal loops, it’s definitely a huge upfront cost in comparison to conventional heat pumps. That being said, if you’re planning on staying at the residence where the geothermal loop is being install for 10-15 years plus it’s definitely worth it. It’ll save you on monthly costs

    • @goranmiljus2664
      @goranmiljus2664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If the loops are installed UNDER the roads outside the house when the suburbs were being set up, costs would be slashed.

    • @vyndral
      @vyndral 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@goranmiljus2664 That's a good point but would traffic vibration reduce the life of the system?

    • @hobbes1887
      @hobbes1887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@goranmiljus2664 but eventual fixing would be a nightmare

    • @eazolan
      @eazolan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think fuel heating costs are going to skyrocket. Expect your money back much sooner.

    • @Salanan
      @Salanan ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What kind of monthly payments are we looking at for say a 3.5ton system? Vertical vs horizontal? I have solar panels and havent paid an electric bill in almost a year... if i'm already not paying an electric bill is something like this even worth it?

  • @martinsmith8747
    @martinsmith8747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I installed Geothermal a couple years after adding solar energy to the home, my overall cost structure went from $4500 per "year" to heat/cool/appliances/Electronics/and gasoline down to $1000 per year for all that including an electric car. Sure investment was high, but I am planning on retirement having lower bills. So far it's working.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Well good thing you are retiring soon because after about 10 years those solar panels are going to be working at half their original output and if they are still functioning after 15 and make it to their pay out life time of 20 year it'll be a miracle but it'll be your kids or the next owners problem then. Also don't expect that electric car to last more than 6 years, maybe 8 before you are paying essentially what you put into it to replace the batteries. (At least 20 grand)
      Green energy isn't nearly as green as you think, solar panels use a LOT of coal and other "dirty" processes to make them but never turn about their carbon footprint they make in their creation.

    • @dans5534
      @dans5534 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SilvaDreams Thank you for some common sense in this comment section. 👏

    • @Aereto
      @Aereto 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SilvaDreams Even if at the point green energy sourcers are enough to self-sustain the manufacturing, the materials require mining and refining. And even then, materials are subject to degredation, whether it is mechanical or electrical.

    • @TheAunvre
      @TheAunvre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@SilvaDreams
      "after about 10 years those solar panels are going to be working at half their original output"
      • Most panels warranty 90% at 10 years, and 80% at 25 years...
      "don't expect that electric car to last more than 6 years, maybe 8"
      • Teslas *worst* warranty level is "8 years or 160,000 km, whichever comes first, with minimum 70% retention of Battery capacity over the warranty period." and they're not going to risk having them fail within warranty periods, so you'll get substantially longer than that. Independent sites list it at 300,000 to 500,000 on average, with some test vehicles having 150,000 km with 90% efficiency still.
      "solar panels use a LOT of coal and other "dirty" processes to make them but never turn about their carbon footprint"
      • Boomer misinformation easily disproven with a quick google search. The manufacturing threshold was passed a long time ago, and solar currently sits at 5-20% of the carbon footprint of gas or coal (depending on if/what carbon capture technology is being used by them, and which of the two you look at)

    • @santiagoperez2094
      @santiagoperez2094 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@SilvaDreams you know that top modern solar panels guarantee 90% functionality in 30 years right?

  • @fredericlaflamme4751
    @fredericlaflamme4751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I'm a HVAC tech, and I do install all type of heat pumps(including Geos) in Quebec,canada, where is is very cold in the winter. It is only worth to change a geothermal heap pump if you already have one that broked. The best thing is a mini-split type heat pump, with a converter for the air handler(24V to data on the signal). Up to 24 000 btu, they have max efficency up to -20C, from 24 000btu to 48 000btu, max efficency up to -15C. It is more small, take less current, get higher temp in heating, breaks less, more resilient to outside changes, and 1/3 of the noise compare to a regular heat pump. Almost silent in cooling. Some machine go up to -35C now, but they are more expensives. Geos will cost up to 30 000$ more on new installs. Buy Nasdac with 10% annual profit with that 30 000$ instead, you will have more money in 10 years for sure. That is my 2 cents on the subject. Geos were hot untill 5 years ago, but not anymore. Get the new shit instead. I install one per day and it is so much better.

    • @Super64heavy
      @Super64heavy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I too am a HVAC tech and agree that Geo isn't as good as people think; many break downs, costly repairs, potential difficulties to access equipment.

    • @rcpmac
      @rcpmac 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Zombie Eric Harris Air to air ductless heat pump technology has been so efficient recently that it’s the only reasonable choice especially when building a well insulated home to modern codes or better.

    • @rcpmac
      @rcpmac 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      💯percent correct. Way too many videos and comments based on 10 to 20 year old technologies. DHP all the way

    • @imzjustplayin
      @imzjustplayin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Problem with ground source heat pumps is that efficiency numbers don't include the recirculation pump's energy consumption.

  • @oj5193
    @oj5193 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I have a ground heat pump in my house in Germany, it has a bit different structure from what you mentioned: it pumps in closed system through two vertical pipes, which are about 60m under the ground. Heating my house which is about 185m2 costs me about one quarter of my neighbor needs for his house, which is smaller than mine. The whole house has average temperature above 19 degrees for the whole winter for 24/7. Two big rooms I keep their temperature above 21 degrees. It’s powered half the day with solar panels. This is the best investment I ever did.

    • @StuntDonk
      @StuntDonk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Especially this winter

    • @hakie.
      @hakie. ปีที่แล้ว

      60 meteres underground? really? seems excessively deep, no?

    • @hakie.
      @hakie. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oj5193 no just curious because I had no idea and was just surprised

  • @mikedixon8741
    @mikedixon8741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Your video touched on just about all my experiences with my gshp geothermal system. We purchased our home in 2002 in SE Virginia with its original open loop geothermal system now 20 years old. Loved it until 2013 when I walked into my garage to find the well pump had blown to roof off itself because the debris in the water over the years had clogged the return line and the pressure destroyed the pump. Crazy estimates to replace the pump and drill a new return line left us still with a 31 year old open loop system. We opted for a new closed loop system that is AMAZING! We had 5 wells drilled instead of the 4 the system called for and they are each 200 feet deep. No debris to deal with in a closed loop system and much quieter since the pump is much smaller. I will never have another heating/cooling system other than geothermal. Great video!

    • @mikedixon8741
      @mikedixon8741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Zombie Eric Harris The cost of the new closed loop system was 18k and some change. Overall it's been the best investment since we've owned our home. Next up is having our crawl space encapsulated.

    • @mikedixon8741
      @mikedixon8741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zombie Eric Harris I'm not so sure I would change a thing in how mine was put in place. My salesman sold me the system, the company already had a well drilling company they used, who not only drilled the wells but installed the loops of tubing, and then connected all of the tubing into the manifold that attaches to the unit. It was "one stop shopping " and it limits the number of persons who have their fingers in the equation. If one subcontractor messes up on their step it can destroy the whole system, and with one person (or contractor) in charge, anything goes wrong it's on them. Good luck with whatever you decide!

  • @rptrower
    @rptrower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I've had geothermal HVAC in my home for 33 years. Recently during an annual service I noticed the mounts on the compressor were rusting through. The system was still working great however I decided to replace it before it failed. The system had paid for it's self at least 2 times compared to using propane.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      With as old as that system is you might want to keep an eye on the underground piping, it is likely to start failing like the mounts for the compressor.

    • @DeadlyCatcher
      @DeadlyCatcher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Imagine the amount of C02 that would've emitted in the environment by burning that much amount of propane!

  • @richardseabright448
    @richardseabright448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +193

    It would be great if new subdivisions were designed to incorporate a "shared" geothermal system installed under the roads/parks etc.
    Similar to how Toronto's Deep lake water cooling works for businesses, just on a smaller scale.

    • @kadewiedeman3127
      @kadewiedeman3127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That would be nice, but who would be financially responsible for fixing it whenever it has a problem in an area that's not on any residents property? Issues that are on a residents property would work like sewage and water lines, where the homeowner is responsible, but who would have to pay for fixing the system if it's main reservoir busted or something, the township? I don't think they'd be too happy to have it built then, since air units by comparison are all on the homeowner.

    • @aoikemono6414
      @aoikemono6414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably great for a small dense area, but not so great for a large sprawling subdivision.

    • @lucassalas1572
      @lucassalas1572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@kadewiedeman3127 HOA can finally make itself useful

    • @kadewiedeman3127
      @kadewiedeman3127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@lucassalas1572 oof, I can only imagine the HOA fee of living in a place with that system, now. The ridiculous $200/month ones here in NJ would look like chump change by comparison.

    • @pumpkinhead456
      @pumpkinhead456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      That's called district heating and happens around the world. We'll see more of it in the future in our urban landscapes.

  • @chrisspy1226
    @chrisspy1226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Insulate & air seal so you need a small affordable heat/cooling system. It's easy & fun to focus on the technology. Passive House, ENERFIT, etc

    • @davidaustin6962
      @davidaustin6962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everyone should check with their local electric company to see what they'll help pay for in this regard. Often it's substantial.

    • @kirkland5674
      @kirkland5674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A tight well insulated house beats all technology solutions including solar. Maintenance free with zero annual cost. A tube of caulk is $2.

    • @zoravar.k7904
      @zoravar.k7904 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kirkland5674 some people like ventilation, as even a small rise in CO2 makes a surprising difference to your mental state and ability. You can insulate as much as you want but if your ventilation system in drawing 10% - 30% fresh air then you will need a system to keep the house at the correct temperature.

  • @randalosgood
    @randalosgood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I put in a geothermal system eight years ago, and it paid for itself in four-plus years. I had to replace my ductwork as well, and the cost for that is figured in. Still running great and one-third the cost of propane to operate. HOWEVER, since then they have developed super-efficient air-to-air heat exchangers that will even work up here in the near-Canadian north. If I had to do it over again I would definitely check that out first! But it is a win-win scenario either way.

    • @johnunsicker7440
      @johnunsicker7440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Man Fully Alive I just put in another Water Furnace geothermal furnace last December after the first one dead 27 years later. The first on cost about $5,000 to install the new one $17,000. The air to air heat exchange was going to be over $18,000 and I didn't get a tax rebate. Right now in the US there a 26% tax rebate you get for a new geothermal system so I get about $3,000 back.

    • @paulsmith5035
      @paulsmith5035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are air to air exchangers functional below freezing temperatures?

  • @V8Tomek
    @V8Tomek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Our house in Slovenia has similar system for heating. We have it for about 12 years and it works without any issiues and electricity bill is pretty low value, compared to other heating systems. All you need a decent piece of land to lay the pipes. We will build new house and I will def. consider this type of heating for the house.

  • @fiskebent
    @fiskebent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We switched from oil to geothermal 2 years ago and it's great. Greener, cheaper and actually heats the house up better.

  • @baccusx13
    @baccusx13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    One of my internship as a Stationary Power Engineer was in a hospital that used a geothermal closed loop system to save energy and even after they discovered that an underground river was partly leaking the energy out, they were able make some good use of it. Thanks for the video and I can only wish to see more houses with geothermal systems in the future. :)

  • @balesjo
    @balesjo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I've been interested in Geothermal heating & cooling since early in the century, particularly the dual source heat pump. You definitely want to have the space a soil types to dig, or a deep pond or lake in which the coils could be installed. It's amazing technology.

  • @jamesfunk7614
    @jamesfunk7614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    In the 1990s, when my Dad looked into it, this was called "geoexchange." "Geothermal" referred to getting heat from deeper underground or from near volcanoes. For some reason, "geoexchange" was dropped.

    • @JamesSmith-ui2hv
      @JamesSmith-ui2hv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      too cheap and efficient , you don't need to replace every 6/8 /or 10 years everything as is done with wind turbines energy or solar energy

    • @ledsalesoz
      @ledsalesoz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      That's exactly right, geothermal is deep heat caused by radioactive decay and earth's internal heat reservoir, as he mentioned earlier in the video. What this video describes is ground-source heat pumps, a different thing altogether. Also as he stated, GSHPs just use the more stable temperatures in the soil to improve the efficiency of heat pump systems somewhat, they do not extract deep heat, which is in the hundreds of degrees C.
      It seems to have become common to confuse the two terms, but someone making such videos should not be using those terms interchangeably, because it's incorrect.

    • @livedandletdie
      @livedandletdie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      In Swedish, this is called Earth Heat, and Geothermal is Geothermal still, sure Geothermal means earth heat... But as with most things, there are better solutions than this. 200 meters below the surface the temperature is about 25 degrees Celsius or 77 Fahrenheit, if you had a closed loop system that far down, you could heat an entire city for free. But oh no doing things the common sense way is too expensive, when it would literally just require that they mined out a 200 meter long hole, and then emptied out perhaps 5000 sq.feet of space and laid heat pipes there and then just put some support to make sure that it was stable, then they'd have free heat for the rest of their fucking lives and then more, they could've been immortal and the heat wouldn't run out.

    • @T34RG45
      @T34RG45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you for letting me know i actually want a geoexchange system

    • @venusreena2532
      @venusreena2532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ground Source is what i remember

  • @lazerunknown3272
    @lazerunknown3272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    I saw this video after watching the Technology Connections video. This upload was perfectly timed! Love the two perspectives!

    • @UndecidedMF
      @UndecidedMF  3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Awesome! Thank you!

    • @czependoza
      @czependoza 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except another guy's Explain Send topic very complicated way

    • @brieannateylar5810
      @brieannateylar5810 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UndecidedMF how many feet of underground piping would you recommend for a 15 x 100 foot building ? How many feet deep should it be buried ? What is the recommended pipe diameter and wall thickness ? You've got me interested in geo-thermal energy , Thanks for any advice you can give .

    • @cody.5102
      @cody.5102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Link to that video? I can’t seem to find it

    • @yeahright3348
      @yeahright3348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The difference is Matt Ferrell doesn't understand heat pumps, he even says a liquid can be compressed.

  • @gloriaguy2031
    @gloriaguy2031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    We're installing a ground source closed loop system at our house and they're using a technology you missed -- directional drilling. Rather than digging up your entire yard or bringing in a well digging rig, it can dig a few feet down and snake around under your yard without excavation. Same technology that was used to replace our below ground level water main when the old galvanized steel pipes burst.
    If you're thinking of installing a system, check to see if anyone in your area does directional drilling! Huge cost savings for the drilling component.

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Does the ground freeze in your area?

    • @e5musicteacher670
      @e5musicteacher670 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!!!!!

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      most places have it, it's also sometimes called "directional boring". It's a super common service since thats what they use to get power or data lines under roads so if you cant find someone to do it you can try calling local utility companies to see who they hire. It's almost never done in house since the codes are pretty stringent, it's highly specialized equipment, and they have really high insurance so it's almost always contracted out.

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@squamish4244 It's pretty rare for the ground to freeze more than a foot down, and even that often takes months of freezing temperatures. Burial depths for plumbing lines vary but 1ft or more is common but almost everyone requires them to be buried below the frost line. I commonly see them buried at the same depth as power lines which are 24 inches measured from the top of the pipe.

    • @robbyketcherside3286
      @robbyketcherside3286 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If that loop isn’t at least 6 to 8 feet deep you efficiency will definitely not be as good as it should be, a geo will only be as efficient as the ground loop due to the fact that it is the means of the thermal transfer.

  • @dlm7
    @dlm7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have a vertical system that was installed 5 years ago and I wish I had done it 20 years ago. I went from oil and coal about $400 a month in the winter (Western NY) now the electric the geo system uses is about $50 a month. Best investment I've made.

  • @koroslav
    @koroslav 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Our experience: 280m2=3000 ft2 house with vertically drilled loop (110meters=360ft deep) works like a charm for 15 years. The costs were low. $5000 for the drilling, $500 for the tubing, $2000 for the unit and the filling is distilled water mixed with methylated alcohol both bought from local distillery for $500. For about $8000 we got no maintenance heating, that lasts for generations.

  • @JesseStJohn-sv9dq
    @JesseStJohn-sv9dq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live in upstate NY and have a 2600 Sq ft house. My geothermal system through dandelion is $ 44,000 for a 6 ton system before incentives and $23000 after incentives. This also includes a 80 gallon residential geothermal hot water tank.

  • @monroejosh
    @monroejosh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I am a big fan of my 3 ton geothermal system. It really didn’t cost me that much more than installing a conventional system or an air source heat pump and the savings are significant.

  • @lghammer778
    @lghammer778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yes, absolutely! I'd love to have a Geothermal heating/cooling system! It'd be awesome for greenhouses as well 😃

  • @pierrefilippi407
    @pierrefilippi407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In finland many privet house owner are using grownheat system. It was in late -70th when it started. It will pay it self back and people are happy with it!!!

  • @mrow7598
    @mrow7598 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    With a whole bunch of real estate appraisers in the family is it worth the cost. YES.

    • @mattheweven4764
      @mattheweven4764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      of course....if your buyers dont have to incur the initial cost

    • @Garth2011
      @Garth2011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not likely a big benefit in resale dollars but likely a great benefit to interest a buyer in that house vs. one without.

    • @kermit56780
      @kermit56780 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      .. straight to hell, enjoy the trip.

    • @bburke
      @bburke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kermit56780 I bet you are a blast a parties

    • @gregmcmullen6698
      @gregmcmullen6698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The appraisers really don't care. All they're concerned about is whether the house is heated and/or cooled. A prospective buyer will care, though.

  • @growlith6969
    @growlith6969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm in a southern zone, mostly interested in the pond setup. With ground water so high locally, pond temps after the first few feet plummet, and we really need cold air more than hot most the year.

  • @mdsloads
    @mdsloads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Built a new house in 2008 with geothermal, would never do anything different but the name of the game is insulate , insulate, insulate then whatever system you have will shine.

  • @ArcofZen
    @ArcofZen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a ground source heat pump (UK) and it’s one of the best upgrades I’ve made to our house. The RHI is great and the pump has been faultless. Fantastic technology.

    • @sghinescu9768
      @sghinescu9768 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, what brand have you purchased, thanks

    • @ArcofZen
      @ArcofZen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sghinescu9768 Kensa

    • @sghinescu9768
      @sghinescu9768 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How much did all the system costed you without installation, how many Kw...much appreciated

  • @jpisty
    @jpisty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I went with a regular A/C install in my house. Just couldnt afford geothermal at this time, but it's definitely a goal of mine within the next 5 years

    • @bodhisfattva7462
      @bodhisfattva7462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it really isnt very affordable unless you are talking new construction or just have an extra $10K burning a hole in your pocket...then there is almost no reason to not install it...digging the pit for the system doesn't cost much when you already have the earth mover to make your foundation and what ever landscaping you are doing before the home build begins...it really cuts the cost of installation.

  • @Embur12
    @Embur12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Had a home built in 94. My builder tried to talk me out of installing an $11k system. It paid for itself in roughly 5 years. It's a fantastic a/c unit and keeps your home steady temperature in winter. Only draw back is you might want a wood burning stove for those super cold days, like we get in Michigan winters, because the system is sized to 10 degrees on the cold side. On a side note my builder threw his closed loop in a pond to save on the installation costs and loves his system. In the dead of winter my worst heating Bill was about $130, while my builders ng furnace was costing him $300 a month. The house was 1800 square foot ranch with a finished basement and stayed super cool all summer long. I thing electric bills for cooling were $30 to $50 a month. If you can do your own trenching or have a pond, your installation costs could be seriously reduced.

    • @jamescassidy5797
      @jamescassidy5797 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We live in southern Wisconsin and our closed loop, horizontal system has been great but it has struggled when we have a polar vortex or long stretches of cold temps in the teens and below.

    • @Embur12
      @Embur12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamescassidy5797 yup they're sized to be efficient, so you definitely want a wood burner or something else for backup.

    • @martinmcquaide4807
      @martinmcquaide4807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think like most homes / builders, undersized systems save the build cost. The builders pocket the savings, the home owners stuck with a unit that won't perform when temperatures are extreme or the unit ages. I installed for years, if the home required a 2.5 ton HP, I bumped to 3 ton with at least a 10kw strip. If 3 ton was close I jumped to 4 ton, or zoned it if was a 2 story. Just installed a propane gas furnace with a HP, in my rental home and t-stat set to 40 degrees. 40 or above HP will give you all the heat the home needs, below 40 burns propane. Very efficient and can get into single digits and the house is comfortable. If I build more homes I'm investing in premium windows, closed cell foam insulation and a ground loop HP with a gas fireplace, as a auxiliary form of heat. I live in the land of retirement homes at the Delaware beaches. Older people like heat. Me too.

    • @kirkellis4329
      @kirkellis4329 ปีที่แล้ว

      How many square feet of area would a pond need to be ? I'm wondering if I put in a 10'x40' lap pool that was only 4' feet deep, and ran the piping under a vinyl pool liner would that be of any use for a heat pump ? Southern California desert so more a cooling climate than a heating one. A pool that would hold 1300 gallons and it takes 8.33btu to raise each gallon 1F, so 11,000btu for each degree of heat it absorbs. A 36,000btu/h heat pump would transfer 3.3F per hour to the pool ? Doesn't seem right.

    • @Embur12
      @Embur12 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamescassidy5797 That's what the wood burner is for, those extreme cold days!

  • @Pickles1864
    @Pickles1864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +236

    I'm surprised you didn't mention some of the other benefits of having this system like it pre-heating your hot water tank and thawing out your driveway and/or patio.

    • @TheRussellStover
      @TheRussellStover 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Heated Floors! Nothing like walking across the tile in your bathroom and it's slightly warm. Nice.

    • @dpt4402
      @dpt4402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      One should use caution with pretreating water with a WSHP as a source as that type of tank storage can fall into a temperature range the promotes the growth of legionella bacteria.

    • @samsonli9490
      @samsonli9490 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Doesn't it need to be under a certain depth so it doesn't get affected by the weather? I don't think there would be any thawing of the driveway or patio.

    • @nraynaud
      @nraynaud 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@samsonli9490 it is at a depth such that the weather effect is reduced, then the difference in temperature is amplified (basically you go from a huge volume of barely above outside temp water to a small volume of lukewarm water). if your driveway is way "smaller" (quotes are because it's not directly the surface area that we compare) than your underground source, you can use your source to melt the snow. The whole cycle is twisted and clever, but there is no free energy, you're cooling your underground to heat the sky.

    • @Karjis
      @Karjis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Not just preheat, you can make hot water with ground source heat pump with no problem. It just needs pump that is capable to make hot enough water so tank is legionella safe. But it is common in europe to do this.

  • @TexSweden
    @TexSweden 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    since I live in Sweden, almost every home built uses closed-loop GSHP (well over 90%). Our house only has a 60m deep hole, but that is coupled with an air-air exchanger. The term used in Sweden is "mountain-heating" ie using the heat stored in the igneous rock beneath most homes. We use an 11kw heating system for our 2300sqft home. It didn't cost that much comparatively - around 20kusd including the drilling and took about 2 days to install. A bonus is that we have under-floor heating in the entire house. Our COP is around 4,2 which is pretty common. I will note that after about 15 years you might need to re-drill the hole in the ground to ensure good heat exhange.

    • @BenCadorette
      @BenCadorette 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Scandinavians should take over the world. You guys would have the rest of us sorted in a decade.

  • @darkmatter1129
    @darkmatter1129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have a vertical closed loop system in Winnipeg Canada for 15 years. Works great for both heating and cooling
    I agree with other comments that it is surprising they are not more common

    • @guyrenault3353
      @guyrenault3353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know it can go to below -40 in the winter. How well does it work at these temperatures?
      I live in northern Ontario.

  • @martinschulz9381
    @martinschulz9381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a cousin who bought a home with geothermal. He was initially not in favor of it, but over time came to like it.

    • @ColtonRDean
      @ColtonRDean 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Over time his opinion....exchanged thermal energy.

    • @ColtonRDean
      @ColtonRDean 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Chris Tombs 🙄

  • @joshuawhite3411
    @joshuawhite3411 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Matt, I can provide some perspective as I am a license heating contractor in Maine. I have just my LP and Nat gas tech license with my tank setting and exterior piping endorsement. One of the biggest set backs to using refrigeration for heating is that in the Northeast and anywhere else it gets well below freezing is going to be very inefficient. Mini-splits are a great source of heating for the fringe seasons like spring and fall where it's too hot to run the wood or pellet stove. The biggest gripe is the massive power requirement the colder it gets outside. This is why Mini-splits aren't as widely used as anywhere else in the country. In a home that requires a new boiler, the average running cost of a brand new system with all new piping, circulators and controls; all said and done is around $10,000 USD. Natural Gas, Propane and even Oil are a much better alternative in the coldest environments. Especially when there are snow storms that knock the power out for days at a time, you can't rely on the power grid for heat. There are ways to use wood heat that are almost as efficient as high efficiency boilers. I have been meaning to at some point try making an underground loop to use with a liquid cooled mini-split to see how it would heat in the winter time. Using loops to exchange energy to and from the ground is the perfect solution for getting past the inefficiency of cold climates. The ambient ground temp 5 feet underground outside my house is around 50 degrees, I have measured it before and this would be a great temperature to use for the mini-split. Making it much easier for the unit to make heat will greatly increase the life and efficiency of the unit, as well as make it so that it could even be used with an off grid back up system.

    • @guyinpajamapants6892
      @guyinpajamapants6892 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely!!! It’s just too cold in the Northeast!

  • @jaybee3165
    @jaybee3165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    they can also add a de-super heater to a geothermal system. it's an exchanger coil that uses excess heat pulled from your home in the summer- to heat water for your house plumbing, rather than just dumping those btu's into the ground.

    • @nikkisweezea2388
      @nikkisweezea2388 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We have that in the loop of ours and it completely heats the water to hotter than we would ever need! When we first bought the house, it was June and the previous owners had turned the water heater completely off when they moved out the previous fall. When the temperature dropped in September that year, we thought the water heater was broken! Paid to have the plumber out, only to have him tell us it wasn't broken, just turned off LOL The loop had been keeping our water hot the whole summer all by itself!

  • @MrMorgsan
    @MrMorgsan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great pacing in this video Matt! This is common practice in Sweden since many years now. We often utilize boreholes of up to 150 meters depth in a closed loop system. This kind of system can be as effective as 8 to 1 and doesn't rely so much on ambient temperatures.

    • @UndecidedMF
      @UndecidedMF  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Really interesting! Thanks for sharing.

  • @treggliebler6237
    @treggliebler6237 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Had a closed loop system in Michigan. Loved it, wouldn't put any other type of system in a home of mine.
    Paid for itself in 3 years because the cost of propane nearley tripled after we installed it.
    It's more comfortable than traditional forced air too because it doesn't blow as hard.

    • @TravelersWarden
      @TravelersWarden 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you share how much you paid for it? In New England and I'm being told it would be like $150K

    • @jacobstrutner8232
      @jacobstrutner8232 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TravelersWarden shouldn't be more than $20k or they are lying

    • @TravelersWarden
      @TravelersWarden 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacobstrutner8232 This guy wasn't quoting me for a system. he had just put in our new air source mini splits. Just telling me the cost in the area for geotherm.

    • @reck0n3r
      @reck0n3r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TravelersWarden No way it's $150k, even if it was a vertical loop, which is the most expensive setup for geothermal, it shouldn't be more than 40-45k.
      Even the "high end" price on a closed horizontal loop seems to be about 30-35k.

    • @TravelersWarden
      @TravelersWarden 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@reck0n3r You're absolutely right. I forgot about these comments and I had gone back and checked with my HVAC guy - it was $150K for a 20K square foot rich person's house on the beach. So....that makes more sense.

  • @eschaferTV
    @eschaferTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    We live in northern Colorado and moved from in-town to a farm with electric base board heating and mini-splits. I'm using your content as part of my homework to best understand how to heat and cool a 2000 sq ft house.
    Fantastic information, plus excellent production as well. Thank you for putting your time and efforts into these topics. I subscribed too!

    • @BabyDeer_Red4
      @BabyDeer_Red4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you end up going with ground source heat?

  • @mfhberg
    @mfhberg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    My aunt had one put in about 35 years ago, and it lasted 33 years without problems.

    • @Steellmor
      @Steellmor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      And what happened 2 years ago?..

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Steellmor Mechanical failure eventually happens in every system, they likely had to pull the piping out and replace it.

    • @Steellmor
      @Steellmor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@SilvaDreams I was just curious what exactly happened since he already mentioned it and the way he did it was kinda funny and intriguing.

    • @adus123
      @adus123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SilvaDreams pull the piping out and replace it??? its more like the heat pump its self needed fixing. not much to go wrong with the piping.

  • @EdwardRomano
    @EdwardRomano 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I put in a closed loop geothermal system in MD in mid-2018. The house we bought had a 30 year old oil system that was failing. Cost was higher than normal because we had to have the oil tank removed and update the chimney. Thought I'd have to deal with 2 contractors, ended up being 6. After federal and state incentives it came out to ~$16K. Would have been ~9K had we gone with gas or air source heat pump. So far very happy! Though I have yet to sit down and chew the numbers to see when the break even will be.

    • @raullasvegas
      @raullasvegas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      where do you live?

    • @kkarllwt
      @kkarllwt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raullasvegas MD. Maryland ?

    • @EdwardRomano
      @EdwardRomano 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maryland, the state referenced in the video that has a $3000 grant for geothermal

    • @raullasvegas
      @raullasvegas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EdwardRomano My apologies, You said that in your comment. Is there a lower temperature limit for your system? If the outside temp is too cold, does the heat pump still work?

    • @EdwardRomano
      @EdwardRomano 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Once you go a few feet down the earth is consistently ~55 degrees no matter where you are. A ground source heat pump is just like an air source heat pump, its just using the 55 degree earth for it's heat exchange instead of the ambient air. An air source heat pump can create heat on even very cold days and cold on even very hot days. Ground source heat pumps are more efficient because they only ever operate at 55 degrees no matter what time of year it is.

  • @jonesgang
    @jonesgang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When building a new house think of the 6 P's. To me it would make sense to install GHC under every house being constructed and drastically reduce the overall cost. Give people a more affordable option then after the fact.

  • @sparda169leon
    @sparda169leon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I remember touring a civ eng's house, in college, that had geothermal in a 2nd basement floor that also worked in line with a commercial freezer room on that same basement floor, with a smaller second pump up in the attic.
    It was nuts. Garden beds were also heated >_>

    • @AlxndrHQ
      @AlxndrHQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤯 he/she definitely needs to do a virtual tour one day

  • @obtuse1291
    @obtuse1291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is not just the cost. The area of ground required for continious geothermal heating and cooling is such that it would be beyond the facility of most typical small freeholding households. And if you are in a flat of sorts such as large population centres such as London, Birmingham, Glasgow reside in, well there is not much chance there is there.
    Provision of a heating and coolong option might also bring us full circle. The systems still consume energy to run and the temptation to run cooling during hot summer periods might encourage previous heating only households to run cooling as well, with corresponding overall increase in annual energy consumption.

  • @DieSalami120
    @DieSalami120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Just as a small international information for you. Here in Switzerland, our House (consisting of 8 seperate appartements) just inquired what would the price for a horizontal Heat Pump be and we all were shocked by the stagerying 120'000-180'000 CHF (that converted to USD is around 7%higher) and thus we will most likely just swap out our heater for a new oil powered one (price around 20'000)
    so the price differences can be a lot higher than in your examples.
    Still good video and have a nice day :)

    • @Rick_Sanchez_C137_
      @Rick_Sanchez_C137_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Check on cost of vertical system… and his was talking about a single house, you said yours was for 8 apartments….

    • @alpanian
      @alpanian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In Switzerland everything is 2-3 times more expensive than elsewhere. Especially when it comes to specialised work you cannot do yourself. I also live in CH and found that costs between companies can vary wildly. I would ask at least 3-4 quotes and ask them to provide you with an ROI calculation vs oil. Theirs margins are ridiculous, if you challenge them, you will be surprised. Most work with developers, who just pass down the costs to new house buyers without questioning them. They have gotten used to this easy way of making money. Electricians are the worst in my opinion.

  • @for-real-tho
    @for-real-tho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The vertical loop systems is now widely used in new homes here in Hungary. We are currently building a house with such system. The tubes go down about 100 meter deep into the ground.
    However people here don't use a system that circulates air, many new houses have floor and ceiling heating.

    • @s.i.m.c.a
      @s.i.m.c.a 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's kinda bad, as air circulation system could be combined with ventilation system to supply fresh air

    • @for-real-tho
      @for-real-tho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@s.i.m.c.a Floor heating provides much better comfort, and requires less energy. There is usually a separate system for air circulation that runs 24/7. We are currently building a house and there is an air vent in every room, as well as floor and ceiling heating. The fresh air from the outside also goes through a heat exchanger and a filter.
      One more advantage is that during summer months, cold ground water can be circulated in the ceiling to cool down the house, which requires very little energy.

  • @timmot123
    @timmot123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Horizontal geothermal heating under gardens was fairly popular in Sweden 20-30 years ago but is quite rare today, it's a lot cheaper up front than the vertical holes bored into the bedrock which is a very effective system and is a lot cheaper and much more effective over time, horizontal thermal heating looses it's functional effect quite quickly and the garden ends up looking really bad as the ground sinks and the garden will have an ugly wave effect after just a few years.

  • @kevinmhadley
    @kevinmhadley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I’m actually looking into this for my house right now. That’s mostly why I clicked on this video. I also work for an HVAC company and they install quite a few heat pump systems in larger buildings.
    My house is sitting on what appears to be highly packed sand. It is a nineteenth century house that currently uses a converted coal gas furnace to make steam. Not very efficient.
    I really enjoy your channel and find your analysis helpful. I especially liked your battery electric snow blower video.

    • @MbeziAmsterdam
      @MbeziAmsterdam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damn bro it's 2021!😂

    • @treggliebler6237
      @treggliebler6237 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had a closed loop system in a previous house and loved it. Very efficient, comfortable and reliable. Our hearing Bill's were less than half that of a traditional forced air system and our cooling bills were about 20%.

    • @thedarkknight1971
      @thedarkknight1971 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You CAN obviously supliment Ground Source Heating with Black Panel roof mounting systems (Like a solar panel, but, its black with pipes running through them) So as the sun shines down water is pumped up to the roof, through the pipes zigzagging through a set of black panels, and then back down into an insulated water tank. And you don't need to have intense summer sun to make good hot water either... 🤔😏👍😎🇬🇧

    • @thomasfoley804
      @thomasfoley804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also have a 19th century house. If you’re going to air condition as well as heat a ground source heat pump would be great! However you should also do what I did to increase the efficiency of my old house. I had no insulation and when I renovated I insulated the house and put 1 inch Styrofoam on the outside under new siding. We added all new double pane windows and cut our oil bills in half to begin with. That should make your heating and cooling much less expensive. Also you can size the heat pump up to 25% over your air conditioning load and still dehumidifier the house in the summer. Good luck!

  • @OldMotorcycleAdventures
    @OldMotorcycleAdventures ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I had no idea this was even a thing in the US until my wife said her coworker from our state has geothermal heat. And going through your cost breakdown, it really seems like a nobrainer to me. We moved into our house, and had to have our boiler replaced within 5 months. That was about $4500. Now, all the cast iron pipes are rotting out, and it will be no less than 30k to refit the entire house. Some of that is asbestos abatement, but most is just how high the cost is. With a price tag that high for pretty much a "brand new" installation of a oil fired boiler, I can't imagine why I would go that route!

    • @michaelhatfull3305
      @michaelhatfull3305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Inverter heat pumps are just as efficient and some even more especially with Ductless finally booming in the US. take a look at those products as well.

    • @Davesworld7
      @Davesworld7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelhatfull3305 Do you know what is meant by an inverter compressor system? It has nothing to do with the type of liquid or gas being moved by the compressor, only an inverter that varies the speed of the compressor no matter what the compressor is pumping which includes geothermal heat transfer as well if someone wanted to make an inverter geothermal compressor. They are more efficient but a little over 10% more efficient at best, not 50%. But the other reasons with comfort, constant temperature maintenance, less inrush current so the lights don't dim and the compressor doesn't make a lot of noise for a second are enough to convince me, just a nicer experience.
      The benefits of an inverter system are that the system starts up at 36%(depending on mfr and model) compressor speed thus reducing the inrush current as many houses with heat pumps cannot start the compressor with solar battery storage as the inrush current(many times the current required to run it once spinning) is too high for the amount the battery bank can discharge for that first half an rpm of the motor. In an inverter driven compressor system, the compressor is always on, it does not cycle and can keep a more constant temperature in the house as it gracefully varies the speed up and down based on what is needed at any given time so the positives alone make it more comfortable and less distracting whether it saves money or not, you would not get that constant cycling where the lights dim for a fraction of a second and make more noise starting like a an aircraft engine ramping up. The reason why it at least saves SOME energy is that the compressor doesn't cycle on to full and then to off and then to full every 2 degree change so it is utilized to only what it needs at any given moment, nothing more, nothing less, just constant temperature and no cycling.
      Where I live, I have a 3 ton heat pump as a packaged unit on the roof at 16 SEER. The only inverter packaged system is made by Bosch and the 3 ton model is 18 SEER and the 5 ton model is 19 seer so there is SOME gain in efficiency, 12% if everyone is telling the truth but not earth shattering. We are still talking about inverter compressors in conventional refrigerant systems. The same improvement could be had in a geothermal system which is already more efficient than conventional refrigeration by a good margin as I hinted at earlier but I am sure the execution and location will vary this a lot. In the summer it often reaches 120 outside and I have seen 122 and to keep the house at 75 degrees, it runs over 23 hours per day and this is an R19 insulated house at only 1300+ square feet. The maximum temp these things are rated to cool at is 125 degrees. The low temperature at dawn is just under 90 sometimes but it can get below 80 on some summer nights. My summer bills are around 300 dollars to keep the house at 75 and this is with a 16 SEER rating, it would save 35 dollars a month for the 18 SEER inverter unit on paper at least. I would still use an inverter for the many benefits in constant temperature, variable compressor speed with no cycling irritation and being able to start the darn thing from battery storage if you have solar. The temptation to convert to either a ducted or unducted split system is certainly there. I use a hospital grade air filter, the ductless system would turn that into several filters but it would be easy to add mini in in the ceiling exchanger in the garage though. I am very interested in ductless just for this reason. There is a limit to how many you can connect to a compressor but I am sure the options are growing by the day.

  • @fishyhobby3697
    @fishyhobby3697 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We also have a property tax exemption annually.. we haven't had any issues yet 12 years running.. water furnace brand

  • @LarsEelke
    @LarsEelke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In really cold places like the northern parts of Europe it may be cost efficient. In the Netherlands (where I’m from) with a relatively mild climate it’s just to expensive to install. An air/water heatpump works just as well here, one-third of the install costs, similar electrical costs.

    • @ashleyclark5845
      @ashleyclark5845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup. the kind of ground you have matters a lot too. Just the cost to dig can skyrocket with these systems.

  • @apalrd8588
    @apalrd8588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Air-source heat pumps (especially with inverters) have really come a long way in efficiency and cold-climate performance, so in many climate zones it's more cost effective long term to install a cold climate air source heat pump than a ground source heat pump with the ground loop costs. Ground temperature is effectively the year-round average air temperature, so there are times of the year where a ground source system is outright less efficient than an air source system.
    For new construction, improved insulation and building quality (air and vapor tightness) can more economically make the required heating and cooling system much smaller than a traditional house, which further reduces the cost effectiveness of geothermal with the high upfront cost of digging and installing the ground loop.
    That doesn't mean geothermal should never be used, but it really depends on your climate and you really need to consider what the COP of each system will be over the year.

    • @ericscott3997
      @ericscott3997 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also (from my basic understanding) Air source heat pumps have the ability to modulate, allowing them to slowly ramp up and down heating and cooling more efficiently. As far as I can find Ground source units do not seem to do this and seem to be more ON/OFF units

    • @apalrd8588
      @apalrd8588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most whole-house heat pumps you would buy from US manufacturers can't modulate either (other than possibly being 2-stage). Only newer inverter heat pumps can modulate, and these are the highest efficiency units.

    • @brandonbowden1262
      @brandonbowden1262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Geothermal and Air to Air Heat pump and cooling units come in inverter types.
      This allows them to operate as low as 25% up to 100% efficiency.

    • @spencerwilton5831
      @spencerwilton5831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I disagree. In a norther European climate at least, we need heat for around six months of the year, when air temperatures are at their lowest. ASHP are less efficient when air temperatures drop. Ground temperatures are almost constant, and in the winter are several degrees higher than air temperatures, so it makes more sense to use ground systems where space and finances allow.

    • @syed2694
      @syed2694 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Air source heat pumps work terribly in colder climates, even with great insulation.

  • @juha2031
    @juha2031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is considered one of the best methods to have a heating in one's home here in Finland. Only downside is higher cost at the beginning but in a long run it has stood the test of time.

  • @louisbakewell597
    @louisbakewell597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I'm studying HV-AC engineering and literally started a project on geothermal heat pumps this week. This video comes in very handy ! Great content as always 😊

    • @ianship5058
      @ianship5058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am at the other end of your scale a retired Refrigeration /AC engineer one of the best jobs ever you will get to places most people never see.

  • @Food4thought1234
    @Food4thought1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When I bought my house 10 years ago I was looking into this. When the estimate was 25g. I was like, I can wait. Maybe now the price has dropped. Plus I’m still renting it out. So I figured it would be no real benefit until I actually live in it. But I would love this.

    • @AhmedAshraf-pd7mu
      @AhmedAshraf-pd7mu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you can charge the residents for the power savings
      I mean they would literally lose nothing. If they now pay X for the heating, they would still pay that X.

    • @rcmrcm3370
      @rcmrcm3370 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AhmedAshraf-pd7mu trying to convince them would not be easy.

    • @AhmedAshraf-pd7mu
      @AhmedAshraf-pd7mu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rcmrcm3370 yeah, some people are not rational enough, but some would be happy to do that
      Personally if I were them I'd actually be glad. Lowering my carbon emissions without doing any effort from my side or any extra expenses!

  • @damienmitchell9828
    @damienmitchell9828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In scotland ground source just doesnt work, companys started to refuse to sell them without and electric boiler as a backup. As we found after around 4 years there was just no heat left in the ground.

    • @Stettafire
      @Stettafire 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ja, I'm not that much further south from you. I was quoted £20k for a start, and the rest of it was pretty terrible. I had to go gas in the end. Cost £7k

  • @RaumBances
    @RaumBances 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I was really confused by the oversimplified diagram when you said "the heat pump compresses the liquid." Without showing the refrigerant loop as what is being compressed, that really threw me off. I was thinking that would need to be one hell of a compressor. :) Thanks for the video. As always very informative and well put together.

    • @UndecidedMF
      @UndecidedMF  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah, I may have oversimplified things.

    • @maxmintz511
      @maxmintz511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Liquids aren’t compressible. Just saying.

    • @reeftank706
      @reeftank706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@UndecidedMF Yeah it we really needed to show the refrigerant to water heat exchanger that acts as the condenser or evaporator depending on heating or cooling mode. I know how this works already so it was good enough for me, but the diagrams looked weird. I paused at 2:38 to put this out here :)

    • @ibanix2
      @ibanix2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@maxmintz511 That's not *exactly* true, they just have very very small compressibility compared to gases. Even solids can be compressed, at an even smaller amount.

    • @Mountain-Man-3000
      @Mountain-Man-3000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep. That animation is just plain wrong.

  • @DennyMelanson1
    @DennyMelanson1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We live in northeastern Canada and have been looking into a geothermal system for new construction, would love to include it in the plans, but the costs are a huge deterrent.

  • @stevenmullens584
    @stevenmullens584 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1993 built new house. just under 10,000 for waterfurnace and horizontal loop and ductwork. 2018 had to replace unit with waterfurnace brand. 6700 dolaars after 30 % tax credit. overall pretty much satisfied. not many problems with first unit. so so good on #2.

  • @phaseshifter3d455
    @phaseshifter3d455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    I asked about geothermal when my house was being built. I came to the conclusion that I'd first need to be rich to save on energy costs lol.

    • @buy_large_mansions
      @buy_large_mansions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If you want to save on energy costs look at heat conservation. There are many things you can do to reduce energy costs that will find it pointless even considering a heat pump.

    • @Kevin-eh7md
      @Kevin-eh7md 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      what a massive bullshit...

    • @masonlynch1793
      @masonlynch1793 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just find whatever is the cheapest heating unit to run and use it.

    • @blessedarmadillo8257
      @blessedarmadillo8257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      How much did you spend on your last car or truck? Did you recoup part of that cost through savings over the years (did the car or truck gain in value or lose value)?

    • @bluegrass4840
      @bluegrass4840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@blessedarmadillo8257 if its a truck it actually may have gained if it was bought used. I've had mine for over a year now bought it used and it's worth more now. Used car market is insane at the moment. Same goes for my wife's Jeep Grand Cherokee.

  • @stoneygreek
    @stoneygreek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    i installed Geothermal closed loop in my house when i built it in 2005. 4000sq ft ranch, 25,000 install cost. average bill per month is 250 year round. that includes heating and cooling my 36x40 garage.

    • @christophervanzetta
      @christophervanzetta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's pretty expensive

    • @jacobvriesema6633
      @jacobvriesema6633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christophervanzetta for a 4000sqft house and a garage that seems pretty good to me, but I suppose that depends on what’s heating or cooling your house. Propane is much more expensive than natural gas, and electric heating is kind of expensive too. I’ve lived in apartments with 1000sqft and paid $80/month in gas during the winter. If I scaled that to 4000 sqft that $250/mo seems good to me.

    • @stoneygreek
      @stoneygreek 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christophervanzetta your right. It was put in in 2005 when Geothermal was rather rare in michigan. its much cheaper now. However it did include two 200 gallon water heaters and the electrical panel.

    • @StripperMonkey
      @StripperMonkey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I pay the same for two natural gas units and two AC coils (central air) in Iowa. Each unit cost $1200 installed. same square footage. Sorry to say but it will be the next home owner that will recoup the cost of your Geothermal

  • @cosmicfantastic
    @cosmicfantastic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i was researching this for my own future home just a few days ago. the timing of this video is blowing my mind haha

    • @YourCaliBos
      @YourCaliBos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We have a geo system , downside is our electric bill is $450 low up to $900 . The unit itself was $20 G, life is maybe 20 years .
      Cost a fortune to repair and after 7 years we had one of the main components go in the unit. No geo for 30 days , hard to use standby emergency power. This was pre pandemic, waiting for the parts.
      I can only imagine now how long the wait would be. So $5 G for a furnace or $20 grand for a unit. Neighbor just got solar $35G . So if you had both then you would save money but how much because the upfront costs are huge . Wanted to share personal experience, there’s a lot to it

  • @douglasburnside
    @douglasburnside 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I went a different route in my 60 year old house. I installed enough solar panels to handle all my heating and cooling needs, plus my cooking, lights, laundry, , hot water, and everything else power related. The house is total electric, my electric bills are $0.00, and there is enough battery storage that, while remaining grid tied, I am capable of being 100% energy independent. My energy cost savings are enough to amortize the system in about the same timeframe as a geothermal system.

    • @blondie2654
      @blondie2654 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For people who are extremely concerned about the environment geothermal heating might be slightly better because of the mining needed to create solar panels

    • @yurlim
      @yurlim 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blondie2654 if they are that concerned why are they using robber pipes?

    • @blondie2654
      @blondie2654 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yurlim I don’t know and solar panels require mining
      Nothing is perfect

    • @silverrose7554
      @silverrose7554 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But your solar will only last 20 years ?

    • @reck0n3r
      @reck0n3r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is your home actually being heated though? I understand that you're using solar to power whatever devices you have - but what device is doing the actual heating? Is it air sourced heat pump? Electric baseboard?

  • @lipsterman1
    @lipsterman1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know a guy who got geothermal setup for his house. He installed it before his house was built. That helped in assembly costs.

  • @Paetaor
    @Paetaor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    My father in law put one in his house 15+ years ago and raves about it. He pays very little for heat in Sudbury, On, where it gets quite cold.
    We ended up with a heat pump in our house as electricity in QC is cheap and we over-insulated the house.

  • @luipaardprint
    @luipaardprint 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    While explaining how the heat pump works it's said that the liquid from the loop is compressed, this is however physically impossible. The warm liquid from the loop is passed through a heat exchanger to boil a refrigerant, this gas is than compressed into a liquid to condense the heat. Much the same as in an airconditioning unit.

    • @Xitrial
      @Xitrial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And there is what I was looking for, the video went past that slide as if nothing, I was, what from 10-15° to 70° only by "compressing"?! Then the top part went from 30° to -5°. I wasn't understanding it too well, the system needs heat from somewhere to start and compensate those 10-15° at the beginning

  • @jamesmcgowan5933
    @jamesmcgowan5933 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Built house with ground source. Ordered 2 extra desperate heaters one for hot water and one for slab heating in basement. It's a very neutral heat. I shopped around and got a trane system that was the most simple. No computer just simple electrical contactors. The contractors push a antifreeze fluid. 15% methanol and water solution was perfect for my area.

  • @attilahorvat1500
    @attilahorvat1500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video, but you missed the probe ground source option, here in Europe it's the most common solution which does not require too much space in your garden.
    I have two probes of 100m length, each of them in 90m depth, you need only a borehole, not much space, I use it for heating, cooling and sanitary warm water, In my case the calculation is about 7-8 years to be even compared to natural gas/elecricity, if I would use other heating/cooling solutions. And as you mentioned closed systems are the best for the long run

  • @valdius85
    @valdius85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This can also be integrated with the piling foundation. For these projects that require piles, geothermal adds only a very small extra as the piping is just tied together with reinforcement. Concrete is good enough at transferring heat, so it does make sense.

    • @houstonbill
      @houstonbill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That is a great idea. I would bet most don't think about that.

    • @valdius85
      @valdius85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@houstonbill
      Nope, they don't. Unfortunately.
      Micro-piles are becoming more popular so it makes me even more sad.
      It's becoming more common for bigger projects though, especially when the government is a client.
      They were installed in Crossrail (new London metro line). I know as I was on the project.
      It's nothing special to be honest with you. The technology is old and conventional...which makes me even more sad :(

    • @Brurgh
      @Brurgh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@valdius85 the Shard in London also has geothermic pile foundations I'm pretty sure

    • @clairecadoux471
      @clairecadoux471 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Brurgh interesting. Thanks for sharing that

  • @DrScott-i9r
    @DrScott-i9r 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Put in my system late summer 2020, Twin Cities area. I just started my second heating season. I really like my system. Last winter I only needed gas back up for a few days.

  • @rt9934
    @rt9934 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video, thanks. I live in Europe (@52 deg N) and I have recently built a new house. Due to limitations on site size, I installed an air to water heat pump as the sole heat source. I am really pleased with the result. Complete house has underfloor heating. There is currently a serious drive here in Europe to get away completely from fossil fuels and reduce CO2 emissions. Perhaps this air to water system could be an option for people in the US also, particularly in Urban areas where availability of ground for Geothermal is severely limited.

  • @amannin1
    @amannin1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Now if I could just buy a home I could actually put some of this stuff into practice.

    • @fredbecker607
      @fredbecker607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Work, watch spending, and save. You can get there if you want to bad enough.

    • @amannin1
      @amannin1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@fredbecker607 You clearly have not been following the mania that is the US housing market. Granted if/when it mellows out, such practical advice may be worthwhile again.

    • @davidaustin6962
      @davidaustin6962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@amannin1 exactly. I feel for my kids. We've left them with an impossible market.

    • @DUCKDUCKGOISMUCHBETTER
      @DUCKDUCKGOISMUCHBETTER 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      1) 3d printed houses are coming along, which will bring down the manufacturing costs dramatically.
      2) In ~8-10 years, fully automated cars will eliminate the long commute issues of living out in the country where the land prices are lower and the roads are lower speeds. So this will allow you to sleep on the way to & from work. Which will in turn, exponentially add to the geographic footprint of how far away you could live from work. And just sleep for an hour or two, going to and from work. Maybe locate equidistant, in the countryside, between 2, 3 or 4 or more large cities, and countless smaller towns, multiplying the job prospects. While simultaneously taking advantage of lower land prices, AND the fully worked out 3d home building technology...all inside of about ~10 years from now. And with the 3d formula of the newly rediscovered art of Roman concrete, which we already know lasts over 2000 years, your house will last...longer than you'll ever need it to without falling down. Because the Roman concrete structures are still standing 2000 years later. And termites & fire & tornadoes do not affect concrete. Just don't build on an earthquake fault or in a flood zone, and you're set for life.
      3) Locate where there's a small year around stream or an underground spring, and you can get your electricity for free from an inexpensive micro-hydro setup. And if it's internal to the house, or to the side & enclosed, and running off an underground spring, it'll never freeze up. And you'll be set. 😂
      Your generation WILL be able to afford housing again...just give the technology some time to catch up.
      Especially the automatic self-driving cars, and the high speed flying drone suits that will come within 20 years, the travel time & sheer aggravation of long commutes will just disappear, as an issue. Driving will be sleeping time. And the flying drone suits will be hundreds of miles an hour, so 100 mile commute will be ~15 minutes each way. Either way, you can live WAY out where the land is cheap.

    • @zoravar.k7904
      @zoravar.k7904 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fredbecker607 with the current housing market around the world even a decent profession will need decades of work to pay off the costs of the land, the house itself is small potatoes. Small savings here and there won't significantly turn back the clock on that. That's why lots of millennials aren't even trying to save for a house. Purchasing power is so messed up right now, i could buy a few Rolls Royce's before getting a decent plot close-ish to a city with good jobs.

  • @SonoIlFactotum
    @SonoIlFactotum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here in Switzerland, that’s a 25-30 years old technologie. We no longer use non-deep geothermal system. Now for a home you have to drill a well between 150m and 300m deep (500 feets to 1000 feets) for the heat exchange.

  • @ryans.7558
    @ryans.7558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Somehow I missed this video of yours back when you posted it. When I got my house here in NH a few years back it did not have and cooling for the summer. Went 1 summer without AC and that was it. I went with a air source Mitsubishi High Efficiency Heat Pump. Honestly this was a great upgrade giving us AC and heat in the winter and combined with solar it's been great and comfortable. That said, doing it over again I would likely consider going geothermal. Looking at the install costs, what it cost to install the air source gets me a good of the way towards a geo system.

    • @TheoreticalString
      @TheoreticalString 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it's any comfort, there's plenty of other options for efficiency, and the best way is to reduce total heating and cooling! High efficiency windows now are coming at at R-5 to R-7, and proper sealing of doors and windows are essentially leakless. Home ventilation ERVs can replace options like 'trickle vents' and high efficiency wall insulation in concert with these measures can reduce your total heating load to half of the amount shown here or less. That's the best way to save energy.

  • @chrisdaniel1339
    @chrisdaniel1339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video! Many properties do not have the land available for geothermal systems except possibly drilling two geothermal wells.
    It is so much easier to use closed loop thermal solar for heating an ultra insulated, very large, indirect(heat exchanger) hot water storage tank that would keep water hot for multiple days both for domestic hot water and radiant floor heating. Then add PV panels for electricity for household use and for running an ultra high SEER rated air conditioner.

  • @vernacular1483
    @vernacular1483 ปีที่แล้ว

    We bought our current home with an aging but still functional 21-yr-old Waterfurnace. Since the ground loop was already installed, it was a no-brainer when the time came to upgrade. We now have a Waterfurnace Series 7 and its pretty amazing TBH

  • @jeronivin
    @jeronivin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Haha, did a project on this during varsity, our conclusion was that geothermal cooling was more viable.
    Edit: for South African uses.

  • @fredricnynas9860
    @fredricnynas9860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Here in Finland is normal nowadays to drill a hole between 100-350 meters for your house, the water in those depts ranges from 3-7 degrees Celsius all year round. Almost every new house uses geothermal heating, the state gives homeowners up to 4000€ if they change their heatingsystem from oil to geothermal.

    • @TheXymelin
      @TheXymelin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@daviddavids2884 each region ground thermal temps are different. Because of that, geothermal isnt solution for everyone. In video he showed 10-15*c temps. Thats realy high ones. Here in Baltics, these temps are about 5-8*c

    • @W1ldSm1le
      @W1ldSm1le 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      3-7 wow that's chilly! 11-13 is normal where I live (new england)

    • @SuperS05
      @SuperS05 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheXymelin Using Geothermal in this context is terrible and is an industry failure. Thats why we use the term ground source HP.

    • @palleericsson8939
      @palleericsson8939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here in Sweden,Stockholm , I have a one vertical 200meter hole for my 200 sqm (2000Sqf) house
      .giving me 7 deg. celsuis in okt and in april it is down to 4-5 degres
      I use it for heating and hot water. I never use AC and I newer put any heat back into to hole. During summer when I dont use it. the temp goes back to 7 deg,
      Its because ground water surounding the hole moves the cold water away and replaces it with new 7 deg water
      My total consumtion is 13400kwh /year incl all electricity

    • @davidaustin6962
      @davidaustin6962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They do this in one of the counties in southern new jersey, all the houses have ground-source. The state doesn't give much incentive but the ground water is super high that they don't have to. They drill down vertical (it's like soft mud to 50 ft down) takes a couple hours, and the holes immediately fill with ground water, then they drop in their loops, you can do it on a postage stamp sized lot. Lowest average heating and cooling bills in the country.

  • @1davidbaugher
    @1davidbaugher 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've have a geothermal for 22 years now still going strong and a great eclectic bill still

  • @bobstan5503
    @bobstan5503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    The cost effectiveness must be closely examined. I engineered HVAC systems for almost 40 years, and your answer is likely based on your assumptions. Would anyone have predicted the increase in electrical rates this year? Or change in fuel prices? A 20 year life cycle cost analysis will give widely varying answers. I have personal experience in two major factors. First as these systems become more popular the cost of the underground systems, has gone up dramatically. Second, when the underground system has an issue (leak, contamination, blockage etc.) it is very difficult to fix. There is also the opportunity cost, i. e. invest the $15k or $20k more that this system costs and use the dividends to offset costs. I am not saying don’t do geothermal. I am saying be very cautious and skeptical, perform due diligence, and frankly if your want to tie up the extra money, especially if you have to borrow.

    • @andreastyrberg7556
      @andreastyrberg7556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn´t watch the video. But local geothermal i extremly much worth it longterm.
      no you doens´t get payback that fast - so you may loose compared to putting money in ETF/stocks. But at least it is easy to loan for it and you usually get lower interest rates.
      But that depends on temperature. My knowledge is from sweden .- where it is "big cost at start, but easy good warming in the long run".

    • @Wogix26
      @Wogix26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@andreastyrberg7556 The problem is geopolitical for the US. How many rolling blackouts per year our states have is ludicrous when they cant support A/C in the summer, when you just reverse your system and put it into heat its drawing the similar amounts of electricity. Furnaces draw very little so unless everyone wants to have intermittent heat and rolling blackouts at the worst possible time causing massive infrastructure damage its not feasible to do with an ailing electrical grid, not to mention those same states are pushing electric only vehicles so even more power draw. Its akin to trying to draw water from a dry well

    • @landlord5552
      @landlord5552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Consider that not everyone are great in investing (oportunity cost), better then buy heating system (in our case old oil pump hade need for change anyway), at least money is not waisted and gives value for house price also (in case you need to sell). Greetings from Finland!

    • @jb5676
      @jb5676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with Bob. I had purchased a home with an existing 14 year old geothermal, which gave me problems to no end. Failing when needed the most, circulating pumps seizing, electrical issues, etc. I was told it's old technology that's the reason, etc, etc. When I built a new house I read too many govt brochures promoting the concept of geothermal. I was told the technology had improved, etc. So I took another stab at it. 700 feet of vertical loop, serves 3 heat pumps. One to heat an indoor pool, one to dehumidify the indoor pool house, and one to heat/AC the 3100 sq ft home and make the domestic hot water. There is also a back-up propane boiler for the really cold months in eastern Ontario, to help heat the hot water further. The back up boiler systems is supposed to be capable of heating the house on its own, during a power failure, wherein the furnace fan will still run off a generator. The Geothermal system at the time of installation in 2010, cost me in excess of $130,000. That's including ducting the house and pool house, but not including the cost of well drilling, nor the backup generator. For 12 years I have had regular breakdowns in the home heating and AC unit, when needed the most in hot summer or cold winter months. Mysterious failures, always explained away as blown fuse, loose wire, crossed wires, low coolant, sticky pump, etc. In the last 3 years, the failures have been monthly or weekly. So the maintenance and service calls are high - always two men, minimum 2 hours charge. So looking at $400-$1000 every time. Then there is the electric bills. $750 per month in the summers, to $1450 per month in the winters. (And of course, us country folk pay higher electricity rates than city folk - distance charges.
      In case you are wondering, all my windows and doors are triple pane with double Low-E argon gas, And I have solar reflector shades for the summer, and solar gain screens for the winter. And R40 spray foam insulation in the ceilings. Yet, my costs for HVAC are through the roof. (BTW, my pool heating is off 5 months through the winter.)
      I don't recommend geothermal unless you have really deep pockets.

  • @moozoo2589
    @moozoo2589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a vertical loop system (4 holes 75m each), NIBE 1245 heat pump, heating 250sqm of house. In winter time, average 0..-15C it consumes around 500-800KW of electricity / month. The installation cost was around 15,000 euro.

  • @PhilipLengden
    @PhilipLengden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First-time viewer and love the concept behind your channel! Just wanted to point out that I think your math is wrong at the beginning of this clip. If 15% of electricity is used for heating, and 16% for cooling it's incorrect to say that 31% of electricity consumption comes from these two sources, given you are either heating or cooling your home, and not both simultaneously. I think it would be more accurate to state that heating & cooling accounts for 15-16% of electricity consumption.

  • @tomsparks3259
    @tomsparks3259 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I offer this as an anecdotal example of living with a geothermal system.
    We have a geothermal system in a 2600fsf house we built in 2012, and it's almost cheaper to heat/cool this house than my previous house which was about 40% the size of my current house.
    However, the new house uses more modern methods of sealing and insulating. The old house (built in 1975) also had a low efficiency gas furnace, and less efficient windows, so it's a bit of an apples and oranges comparison. Still, it was a pleasant surprise when the first bill came in.
    The entire system cost, ducts, four vertical wells and all, was around $30K and we took advantage of the 30% tax credit. The electrical power company gives us a discount on our electricity for having all-electric heating and cooling. Also included in the cost was a highly insulated electric water heater as the system uses the heated water in the winter time.
    Heat pumps, (or plain electric heat for that matter,) don't need makeup air coming in to replace flue gases rejected by a combustion process. So things are incrementally better on on that front too.
    Nine years in, the system, built by Carrier, has been 100% reliable. Your mileage may vary.
    Geothermal is supposed to have advantages on various fronts, environmental impact, efficiency and perhaps long-term costs. The root source of that power, whether it is coal, nuclear, wind, solar, or natual gas, affects these advantages.
    So is my geothermal system more environmentally friendly? When our area had an operating nuclear power plant, maybe. However, when the local nuclear plant was decomissioned, (it was a single-reactor plant built in 1969,) the major electrical production source became coal supplemented with natural gas turbine generators in peak periods. So no. it's probably dirtier now. BTW, that also means all the electric cars in the area are coal-powered as well.
    I offer the following nuclear plant info as information, not advocacy for or against nuclear power. I was actually disappointed when the plant was decommissioned. But its ongoing costs still affect the overall costs of our all-electric geothermal system.
    Nuclear plants of the era our plant was built have a working lifespan of about 50 years, and after they're shut down they still need tending for about another 50 years. The materials a nuclear plant is built from, the steel and concrete, become somewhat radioactive and need time for that radioactivity to decay before they can be demolished safely. So even though we aren't using electricity produced by nuclear power, we are, in a way, still paying for it like we are and will be for another 50 years. This plant, like a lot of others, has spent nuclear fuel still on site, sitting in a pool of water still waiting for its ultimate disposal. However costs are mitigated by the fact that our state has utility systems that are owned by the users, so our electrical costs to the user are lower than most states.
    Looking to the future, the local coal plant has been upfitted to be about as clean as possible, and the power company is being very helpful when people want to tie their photovoltaic systems into the grid. The power company is also exploring grid-level wind systems, and grid-level PV systems. Interestingly, they don't seem to be exploring modern nuclear options at all.
    Bottom line, we love our geothermal system no matter where the power comes from.

    • @spiggity8
      @spiggity8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That was a lot of good information! Thank you!

    • @janking2762
      @janking2762 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In our area you can purchase your electricity from all renewable sources.

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We install units in old farmhouses that are leaking like sieves and which the owner was on propane or oil and paying $4 - $5k a year (!) plus A/C on top. The houses get warm without insulation and save the owner at least $2.5k a year. The 30k unit or lower if they had a pond loop or a well is paid for in 10 years.
      For a long time our ideal client for geo was a young family living off the gas line with a large yard or a well and an old house. We did good business at farm shows. It's changing as geo becomes more well-known. Installing loops underneath skyscrapers being constructed will be the next big thing.

    • @gregrempel1402
      @gregrempel1402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the late 90's I installed a ground loop system, the installer did not understand the soil conditions required for the system to operate. It was a complete failure and a waste of money. 25 years later I have been to many energy efficient homes in cold northern Alberta, in every case a well insulated envelope far outweighs the heat source. The apples and oranges comment is so true, talk to someone about how cheaply you can heat a R50 home, your insulation will last a lifetime, your $30,000 heat system will not. I am guessing what a geo thermal system costs today, the point is a heat pump, electric heat or thermal massing makes more sense than a intricate system that will eventually fail.

    • @BrianHeimbuecher
      @BrianHeimbuecher 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah, the 'Greenpeace Effect' on the power company's 'green' future. Between using breeder-reactors to desalinate sea water, and the recycling of spent fuel rods (it's big in France), nuclear should at least get a shake... but these are far from sane times. If you don't want to live in the stone age, you're supposed to feel bad. Thank you for the excellent overview of your geothermal pump!

  • @cranedaddy678
    @cranedaddy678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had a 5 ton horizontal loop geothermal system put in my place in 2016. Total cost after tax credits and my electric company's $1000 rebate per ton ended up being around $13k.

  • @kentay2561
    @kentay2561 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Geothermal heating seems like a misnomer. More appropriately called ground source heat pumps vs traditional air source heat pumps.

    • @scaryjeff
      @scaryjeff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agreed! You have to go 100s of meters down in most places to get any true geothermal power. The wiki on 'Geothermal gradient' explains this well.

    • @stephenhurley4296
      @stephenhurley4296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Geo is short for geological or geography yes so it means the ground or the study of the ground and all it's parts and things. so any heat you pump into or out of the ground has to be by definition geothermal sure your not tapping into a hot spring or a volcanic tube or anything but the title is 100% accurate

  • @yoyodyn002
    @yoyodyn002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've had geo thermal installed for about 10 years now in Tennessee. Very little maintenance. Still have supplementary getting for when the temps drop below 0 for long periods.

  • @SergeJCCote
    @SergeJCCote 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a retired real estate developper and builder from the Whistler and Pemberton, BC, Canada, area. I did my first experiments with geothermal energy in the early 2000s. I fell in love with this eco-friendly energy source right from the get go. I did an entire project, The Frontier at Pioneer Junction in Pemberton, BC, 80 condos and townhouses, all equiped with their own geothermal system and dedicated vertical loops. It was NOT an option. Occasionally, I happily refered prorspective buyers who questioned the price tag of our units to go check across the road if they didn't think we offered greater long term value, not only financially but also ecologically. We usually made the sale. I even built the gas station (originally branded Shell) with a C-store right at the entrance to that subdivision. We used a combination of vertical boreholes, slingky and even some horizontal loops. All the heat producing equipement inside the C-store, such as refrigirators, freezers, ice maker and even the slushy machine, were purchased as water cooled units so that we connect them onto the ground loop system. We did this to minimize the heat accumulation inside the store and reduce the demand for energy. When you think of it, it's crazy to produce extra cooling capacity to overcome the heat produced by your equipment. I should point that summer cooling requirements in Pemberton, BC, far exceeded heating requirements in the winter. So, with the extra heat producing potential in the winter, we redirected some of that heat to a snow-melt area, a thick concrete slab covering two parking stalls located away from the builting and equiped with a manhole connected to the municipal storm sewer system, where we pushed the snow in the winter. It worked like a charm, it was slow but it worked. We had a manual valve to isolate the snow-melt loop from the rest of the ground loop system in the summer. It was a really wellworth experiment. I highly recommend the extensive use of geothermal systems. As a matter of fact, I have a new challenge, I plan to build an experimental 15,000sq.ft. greenhouse using a high yield Bioponix agriculture system (fully organic, see www.bioponixag.com) ) with a full geothermal system. If there's anyone out there with an interest or experience with geothermal in greenhouse or other energy demand settings, please contact me serge.cote@bioponixag.com

  • @kc7ekk
    @kc7ekk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    In our previous house (Northern Utah) in 2013, we installed a vertical ground loop heat pump system. At the time there was a federal rebate. Total ROI was 8.5 years. It is a fabulous system.
    At our new home I looked into installing a vertical ground loop heat pump again. However this time (due to the much higher efficiency of the home, no more 30% federal rebate and higher install costs) the ROI would have been 69 years. Ouch!! We installed an air source system instead and has been great too.

    • @cordeliaparham6800
      @cordeliaparham6800 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't understand, why was the second situation so less economical?

    • @kc7ekk
      @kc7ekk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@cordeliaparham6800 Federal rebate is no longer available, only one company installing them in N. Utah now. With no competition they raised drilling prices substantially. Also the home is more energy efficient than the last one so less energy consumption means a smaller energy bill. Higher overall install cost divided by a smaller energy bill makes a larger ROI.

  • @Untamo82
    @Untamo82 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We've had a ground heat pump running for 11 years now, with a 600m of pipe in a horizontal setup at about 1,5m depth (on a lot of about 2200 square meters). Live in northern Finland, and we get down to -30C in the winter, but usually around -10C to -20C. The monthly average electric cost of running the pump for heating the house and water is about 20€. The house is two story, 213 square meters, and well insulated.

  • @williamlowry8663
    @williamlowry8663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have a closed loop system. 8 wells down 150 ft each GTREAT thing we did over 20 yrs ago. We replaced a a inside furnace it is saving us each yr. Last summer we added solar panels saving us more.

  • @pavelbaidurov228
    @pavelbaidurov228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    First you need to upgrade your house into passive house or close to it. It will reduce your system size by 30-40%

    • @buddyplatt6496
      @buddyplatt6496 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What exactly is "passive" system? Thanks.

    • @pavelbaidurov228
      @pavelbaidurov228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@buddyplatt6496 Google "Passive house"

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KevinJDildonik To be fair now days many houses in the US are easily from the 1960's to maybe the 80's and you might as well flatten the house and rebuild the entire thing because of MANY changes in building codes, electrical, plumbing and geothermal heated houses tend to work best when built that way.