Thanks once again for the playthrough, very useful. Normally I tend to turtle, but seeing your videos makes it very easy to see aggro is the best. Very anticlimatic campagin overall, most escenarios I was left wondering "is that it?". But maybe that's because of PTSD after Ivaylo, Kotyan and Pachacuti...
Strange when i played it years ago the bridge broke down and hugarians build a wonder to beat me and i had to make orangers to burn forest down from the far south east to invade and rush to the wonder and when it was down they just conceded...oh well i guess i was too slow XD (oh you noted it in the end i remebered it right :) )
I love how anti climatic the invasion of Hungary was. we’ve defeated Hungary but the cumans did some things so now we must leave. Or other reasons since no one 100% knows why they left. Also I wish there was a Hungarian campaign to wrap up the stories of the Cumans and Mongols. Since the second invasion of Hungary was the point where the mongols begun to die out suffering catastrophic losses in their latter invasions.
I would love to see additional official DLCs that are just campaigns. I'd definitely pay $15 for 4 fully voiced-acted campaigns. Especially since Magyars, Slavs, Lithuanians, Chinese, Persians, Japanese, Koreans, Mayans, and Britons do not have full campaigns (several of those have historical battles, but it would be great to see a full campaign).
there’s so many campaigns that just end Anti climatically, so I would happily pay the extra $20 my currency to see the ends of them. There should be a Magyar campaign to wrap up the story of the Bulgarian, Cuman and Mongol campaigns. It would have to range over 3 generations since it was king Béla and his grandson who were the key rulers but it would still fit nicely into the timeline. The Persians were the graveyard of empires so it would be nice to see a campaign based around them. also they are just fun to play in general. Asia is filled with Campaigns but I’d like to see a Japanese Campaign. But I don’t know much about Asian history so I don’t know who they’d fight other than Japan, Korea, the mongols and China. And the Britions would be nice, maybe a campaign prior to the Crusades. But they do have a lot of historical battles so maybe the mayans should take their place. I remember hearing that their will be no more new civs but it’d be nice to see some of the civs that didn’t make it. like the Venetians and Bohemians. since a Campaign based around the Hussite wars would be interesting. or Atleast substitute in a similar civ to give them a campaign.
The Owlogram I’ve read that, Ögedei’s death was an illogical reason for the mongols to abandon their world conquest when they were on the cusp of victory. the Cuman rebellion theory is more logical but it can’t be proven.
they had to return because both Subedei and Batu, leaders in the Cuman campaign, had to fight against Guyuk's rise to power. Also, Hungarian plains could only feed about 30 000 horses on nomad pastoralism. that's not enough to make this place a base for future wars in Europe. And at the last, stone fortresses were too strong for chinese artillery.
Knew that the bridge could be blown up, did not know about the crossing. Kid me thought that you had to hurry up or at least nail down a beachhead with production before a certain amount of time.
I put 3 gates on my side of the bride blocking it. Idk what it is but the enemy hardly ever attacks the gates. This gives you free reign to boom and you can head south with onagers. When I did it the enemy had over 12 units on my side of the bridge but were trapped because it exploded so they were down by quite a lot. Onagers and trebs took down southern forest/bombard towers and I invaded. I sent the rest of my saboteurs near they’re town center and sent one saboteur for each villager. Now after I crippled their economy the invasion was easy
I was fucked here, first time playing the map and on moderate. I turtled til Subotai came and I attacked the bridge, then the godamn Hungarians blew it up, Subotai and entire army gone. I raged so hard.
I've never reached the point in this mission where Hungry blows up the bridge. It happened once as a kid when I wasn't as good at the game haha I remember the expunging so many resources to get siege onagers
I was malding when the game suddenly decided to blow up the bridge without any hints of that could happen I was told to survive until reinforcement come and thought I was supposed to turtle a bit Then I realized I could cut through trees in the south Not sure why the AI is so non aggressive at all. Hard is like on easy, not that I want too much challenge
Yeah that's a good idea! I'm still not 100% sure what I'm going to do just yet, but I'm going to def do some stuff like that, as well as custom campaigns (in addition to my regular tier list videos/patch notes stuff). I'm actually pretty close to being finished with all the campaign vid recordings now, so I'll have so time to think about and work on new ideas :)
I always lose in here :( I have NO idea When the enemy destroy the bridge. Me think me need to defend until reinforcement come. But some minute after the reinforcement come. The bridge destroyed by the enemy. I have no time to Immediately attack because my units totally injured so me need time to rebuild it. But when me gonna attack the bridge destroyed. Then the enemy win because the wonders oof
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians: First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)." Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): th-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/w-d-xo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
![Aoe2 DE Campaign Achievements: The Go-Getter [Genghis Khan 6. Pax Mongolica]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YK9PeprL8CY/mqdefault.jpg)
40 minutes pass.
Subutai and his 5 cav archers: Allow us to introduce ourselves.
Edit: He also brings doggos
Thanks once again for the playthrough, very useful. Normally I tend to turtle, but seeing your videos makes it very easy to see aggro is the best.
Very anticlimatic campagin overall, most escenarios I was left wondering "is that it?". But maybe that's because of PTSD after Ivaylo, Kotyan and Pachacuti...
Ah!!! I can relate
In the DE subotai comes with Khan's who are calavary archers with great stats
Saboteurs are actually boats. Towers hit them like a ton of bricks
"Hard to not win." Challenge accepted!
Strange when i played it years ago the bridge broke down and hugarians build a wonder to beat me and i had to make orangers to burn forest down from the far south east to invade and rush to the wonder and when it was down they just conceded...oh well i guess i was too slow XD (oh you noted it in the end i remebered it right :) )
I love how anti climatic the invasion of Hungary was. we’ve defeated Hungary but the cumans did some things so now we must leave. Or other reasons since no one 100% knows why they left.
Also I wish there was a Hungarian campaign to wrap up the stories of the Cumans and Mongols. Since the second invasion of Hungary was the point where the mongols begun to die out suffering catastrophic losses in their latter invasions.
I would love to see additional official DLCs that are just campaigns. I'd definitely pay $15 for 4 fully voiced-acted campaigns. Especially since Magyars, Slavs, Lithuanians, Chinese, Persians, Japanese, Koreans, Mayans, and Britons do not have full campaigns (several of those have historical battles, but it would be great to see a full campaign).
there’s so many campaigns that just end Anti climatically, so I would happily pay the extra $20 my currency to see the ends of them. There should be a Magyar campaign to wrap up the story of the Bulgarian, Cuman and Mongol campaigns. It would have to range over 3 generations since it was king Béla and his grandson who were the key rulers but it would still fit nicely into the timeline.
The Persians were the graveyard of empires so it would be nice to see a campaign based around them. also they are just fun to play in general.
Asia is filled with Campaigns but I’d like to see a Japanese Campaign. But I don’t know much about Asian history so I don’t know who they’d fight other than Japan, Korea, the mongols and China.
And the Britions would be nice, maybe a campaign prior to the Crusades. But they do have a lot of historical battles so maybe the mayans should take their place.
I remember hearing that their will be no more new civs but it’d be nice to see some of the civs that didn’t make it. like the Venetians and Bohemians. since a Campaign based around the Hussite wars would be interesting. or Atleast substitute in a similar civ to give them a campaign.
The reason the Mongols left is because Ogedei Khan died, so they had to come back in Mongolia to settle his succession.
The Owlogram I’ve read that, Ögedei’s death was an illogical reason for the mongols to abandon their world conquest when they were on the cusp of victory. the Cuman rebellion theory is more logical but it can’t be proven.
they had to return because both Subedei and Batu, leaders in the Cuman campaign, had to fight against Guyuk's rise to power. Also, Hungarian plains could only feed about 30 000 horses on nomad pastoralism. that's not enough to make this place a base for future wars in Europe. And at the last, stone fortresses were too strong for chinese artillery.
17:00 NOW THAT'S A LOTTA DAMAGE
jumpscare noise :D
I know I'm late but in DE subotai brings 20 or something khans who are mangudai on steroids
Knew that the bridge could be blown up, did not know about the crossing. Kid me thought that you had to hurry up or at least nail down a beachhead with production before a certain amount of time.
arrival of the armies of Gog and Magog and the beginning of the Apocalypse
I put 3 gates on my side of the bride blocking it. Idk what it is but the enemy hardly ever attacks the gates. This gives you free reign to boom and you can head south with onagers. When I did it the enemy had over 12 units on my side of the bridge but were trapped because it exploded so they were down by quite a lot. Onagers and trebs took down southern forest/bombard towers and I invaded. I sent the rest of my saboteurs near they’re town center and sent one saboteur for each villager. Now after I crippled their economy the invasion was easy
I was fucked here, first time playing the map and on moderate. I turtled til Subotai came and I attacked the bridge, then the godamn Hungarians blew it up, Subotai and entire army gone. I raged so hard.
I've never reached the point in this mission where Hungry blows up the bridge. It happened once as a kid when I wasn't as good at the game haha I remember the expunging so many resources to get siege onagers
I was malding when the game suddenly decided to blow up the bridge without any hints of that could happen
I was told to survive until reinforcement come and thought I was supposed to turtle a bit
Then I realized I could cut through trees in the south
Not sure why the AI is so non aggressive at all. Hard is like on easy, not that I want too much challenge
Gotta love the spanish pronouncation of river Sajó
boy this scenery gives me a really hard time
Hey Ornlu when you're finished with all the campaigns, can you do your favorite and least favorites after?
Yeah that's a good idea! I'm still not 100% sure what I'm going to do just yet, but I'm going to def do some stuff like that, as well as custom campaigns (in addition to my regular tier list videos/patch notes stuff). I'm actually pretty close to being finished with all the campaign vid recordings now, so I'll have so time to think about and work on new ideas :)
Legend is his jokes haven't got him killed.
What about Wenceslaus when he led the Bohemian knights by yelling "Charge!"? Was that AOC or AOK before?
I always lose in here :( I have NO idea When the enemy destroy the bridge. Me think me need to defend until reinforcement come. But some minute after the reinforcement come. The bridge destroyed by the enemy. I have no time to Immediately attack because my units totally injured so me need time to rebuild it. But when me gonna attack the bridge destroyed. Then the enemy win because the wonders oof
Now let's see if the Magyar cavalry is a challenge at last :P
This was so easy for me. I remeber it being much harder.
"Pax Mongolica" means Mongolian peace in #Latin
Wow thanks man for this info was guessing what could it mean
The fun ist by you IT Look so easy and when i Made IT IS Waterloo Stalingrad and battel of Kalka together and i lose 😟😟😟
Known world is almost europe and asia in that era
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians:
First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)."
Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu...
So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): th-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/w-d-xo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Ghenghis is finished, next up Gajah Mada!!
Or Sundjata.
@@frankseward7017 Sundjata, then Gajah Mada :)
@@OrnLu_AoE Isn't the next one Kotyan Khan ?
Mohi 1241
Bad as usual at the game 👌🤩😍
only the worst for you guys!