CINDERELLA (2021) - The Cursed Remake Nobody Wanted
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- you're gonna know my NAAAEEAAAAAAME
Ayylien Clothing ► ayylienclothin...
Twitch ► / elvisthealien
Patreon ► / elvisthealien
Twitter ► / elvisthealientv
Instagram ► / elvisthealien
My other channels:
People Ruin Everything ► / @peopleruineverything9026
alienbacon ► / @alienbacon
Elvis The Human ► bit.ly/2Yokrc4
Thank you for watching! 👽
----------------------------------------
Outro song ► / neuro
video editing help by @replayed sign up for free here: replayed.co/jo...
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.4 (4/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d3l5rxl5CVo/mqdefault.jpg)
I've been uploading a lot on my second channel 'Elvis The Human', check it out if you have the time, thanks! : th-cam.com/users/elvisthehuman
hi
Hey elvis, is the mint green beanie you are wearing in this video available on your website?I need one but the one on your site looks to be a different green.
You need facial hair
Watch The Banana Splits movie it the other FNAF MOVIE not bad but not as good as Willy's Wonderland
What the heck was the conflict in this movie?
I just hate how the writers thought the only way to write a strong female character was to surround her with sexist, idiotic, and perverted male characters.
Seriously tho!!🤣🤣
Plus she’s trying soo hard to be ✨different✨ it’s actually annoying
Like she should’ve been a normal girl who came to the realization that she needs to be strong on her own
@@maryamtara2934 if they wanted to be different they could have made one where one of the 400 girls rejects a great guy because she thought she had a shot with the prince and is now alone forever.
because - I'll never stress this enough - they don't know how to write properly strong females anymore, so they have two ways to make them stronger: either making them similar to men, or downsizing everybody else.
@@waltercomunello121 Feminism marched over women in the process of criticizing men, and left women with an identity crisis that they are either forced to behave as stereotypical women, formerly curated by men, or be the antithesis of stereotypical women. It really didn't serve its purpose in helping women find themselves, and just left them questioning what the fuck to do with their destiny when its finally in their hands. Which has lately forced this "girlboss" shit.
Why can't we have a faithful Cinderella remake where the stepsisters cut off parts of their foot to fit in the glass slipper and get their eyes poked out by birds? Now that's a movie I would like to see.
Yes
I mean, Into the Woods did that. But I suppose a dedicated Cinderella movie featuring that would be better, but then it wouldn't be kid friendly so no big Hollywood production anytime soon
@@moonshonemeadow a Pg-13 Tim Burton rendition of Cinderella would be really cool
It's not a remake it's different version. Because it's Disney version ig
No..no more Cinderella for another century. There's like 300 Grimm's fairy tales
Ella Enchanted is an example of doing the “modern take” fairytale SUCCESSFULLY. This was way too in your face
Ikr! They even used "Somebody to Love" in this disaster which makes kinda clear to me that the writers were "inspired" by Ella Enchanted.
Meh even Ella Enchanted (the movie) was garbage. Book was superior
@@amanda_2829 that queen in this movie is also that godmother in ella enchanted - the one that lives with Ella
Ella Enchanted is my childhood it’s not a masterpiece by any means but it’s so much better than this movie.
that take was nt very poppin' of you
The rap sections are 1000% there because the directors were like hmmmm Hamilton and In The Heights were amazing let's just do that
Exactly what I was thinking, just because it works for Hamilton doesn't mean it works for everything
Just what I was thinking lmao
I mean tbf, Doc Brown (the town crier / rapper) has been doing this kinda stuff a while before Hamilton. But the popularity of Hamilton probably did push them in that direction.
@@alytrash except doc brown is annoying and Hamilton isnt
Or because doc Brown is a famous rap comedian
This has such strong high school theater energy that it’s painful.
My high school production of Sweeney Todd had better acting than this.
I was in high school theatre, I've seen way better acting and singing in all of those then this film
This shit has Lele Pons vibes written all over it
Oh hey, a Ace Attorney fan, here? I didn't expect to see one on a channel like this.
I'm the third person who can say the high school plays I've gone to were better
Ella doesn't actually _do_ anything for herself or solve her own problems. Everything is handed to her by the prince, fabulous godmother, or plot convenience. Not very "girl boss" if you ask me.
When the OG Cinderella was more of an active protag than the girl bossed Cinderella 😂 so much for a remake where she doesn’t need a man to do everything for her
Exactly! It seems like this film's (or rather, the film director's) idea of a "girl boss" is a female who acts tough but has no actual personality or agency of her own outside of speaking out against social injustices and doing nothing to actually try to fix said social injustices all the while everything is handed to her on a silver platter because she deserves it, I guess.
Um...empowering?
@@autisticscreechling4950 thats so more people can relate, isnt that what most teenage 'girlboss' ladies do? Complain about shit on their iPhone 99 pro x ultra max that their parents bought for them?
@@ok0_0 no
@@elizabethb4168 yes
The scariest part of the movie is that Cinderella’s actress is a singer in real life.
I didn't know that before, looked it up after I watched and was really surprised/confused.
Camila Cabello was only chosen to play Cinderella because she’s popular (and actually so decent it’s okay) to boot.
Anyways, she could definitely regret that movie because it’s utterly terrible.
and racist!
and the only reason why this movie is even getting love or stuff is because camila is popular, and that's it
@@Theleaver5088 honestly, I don't even know if describing Camila as "popular" is even correct because I'm only familiar with one of her songs and nobody I've ever talked to recognizes her.
I actually really like the original, I actually can relate to it in a way.
The thing people forget is that she's in an abusive environment and she has been since childhood, she's known nothing else since not being able to leave the house and only seeing her abusing step family.
The dress and going to the ball means more to her because it's her escape, it shows her there's more out there and she can escape her situation thanks to the fairy godmother showing her this.
When you're in an abusive situation you're not an independent person, they tear you down from the inside in every way possible and make you believe you deserve it.
There's more real emotion in the original and I don't evn think the prince saves her, I think it's the fairy god mother showing her kindness and a way out of her situation.
The dress being ruined is worse in the original because it was the only thing she had and they really destroyed it. It broke her.
I think it's a wonderful film and idk unless you've been in that situation you might not understand her being trapped as much.
@@Raya-ir4tm I remember reading a comment how this was leaving "Old cinderella" behind for the new and that just irked me in so many ways because how i took it is that she was downplaying actual victims who could be possibly be in the similar situation or use to be and resonate with her since Cinderella despite her hardships remained unapologetically herself and treated everyone equally with respect regardless instead of conforming to becoming the abuser or quote on quote "Girl boss".
Also, she never goes looking for the prince, she even doesn't even know the prince is the prince during the ball. The prince just gives her the oportunity to leave when she is finally ready to leave.
That’s what I was thinking to.
@@kyaos_Meteor I agree with you. I think people forget that the fairytales, Disney based a lot of their movies on (nothing wrong with that, I love Disney movie’s) have a message for young kids to learn from.
@@CourtneyMaria2 exactly and in this case of Cinderella the message here is with self perseverance and hard work will get you out no matter how hopeless and dark your situation seems,that's what she did especially for me growing up her and Matilda taught me hope and how i was treated was not ok and im somebody who deserved respect,happiness and love.
It's honestly exhausting that basically every Cinderella movie that's coming out is an "omg girlboss" remake. Like I'm as feminist as they come but I feel like these remakes miss the point of the original Cinderella, which is about an abused girl who breaks the cycle of abuse by staying kind and compassionate to those around her and is rewarded for it.
Cinderella isn't weak or "not feminist" for not being a girlboss or whatever, she's a good person who chooses kindness and optimism even when it's hard. And her story was never about sitting around waiting for a man to rescue her; she literally went to the ball because she wanted a fun night out away from her abusive family and just so happened to meet the prince who fell in love with her.
There's nothing inherently bad with these girlboss remakes but it feels kind of insulting when that's ALL that ever comes out, like the original Cinderella is something that needs to be "fixed."
I agree!
I agree, too!!!!!
100% agree. There is something special about original stories that remakes miss entirely.
too long + didn't read + don't care + zyzz ratio
I really liked the ever after one with drew barrymore
In the Disney version it wasn't some random dress; it was her mother's dress that she decided to fix up. The animals fixed it up for her because she didn't have the time, and then her stepsisters destroyed it out of spite. Then the Fairy Godmother took that and magicked it up.
Well, Fairy Godmother did not restore the mother's dress at all, just gave a whole new one.
That bothered me for many years. It was clear Cinderella loved and missed her mother and losing that dress made her so sad. So why didn't the Godmother honour that.
Recently I concluded that the Godmother must have decided Cindy was ready for her own dress, to be her own adult person, instead of her mom's daughter.
Truth is Cindy loved her new dress and there was never again a mention to her mother after that.
@@neliaferreira9983 they even had a cinderella book that was even more in depth and added a lot of character for cinderella and the prince included
@@neliaferreira9983 She restored in the 2015 live action though
And the mice did that for Cinderella because of her kindness towards them, it was a REWARD, just like the gifts of the fairy godmother, those were also rewards for her kindness, hard work, endurance and her capability of keep believing even in her conditions as an abuse victim!
The super fast arrangement with the prince wasn't Charming's idea, it was because his father wanted so badly to get him married!!
@@anvitamohan7939 that one is crap, as almost all live action remakes of Disney classic movies
simply by seeing the ads for that movie, i knew it would be garbage
why arent we even surprised anymore by all those remakes
Tho ok I really love Billy Porter in this lol
Billy's role was my favourite change they made to the original :)
He was the worst thing about it.
He's the worst part of the movie lol
Billy porter was the only good part of this movie.
The reviews on Billy are very mixed. I don’t know how to feel and I refuse to watch the movie 🤣
Okay, so actually a really noticeable actress in this movie is the woman who plays the step mother. She is Elsa from Frozen and was in other musicals. She very talented and it's sad that she took this part tbh. She deserves better. However, the only good and original song in this movie is sung by her and it's amazing. I love her lol.
her name is Idina Menzel, and she played Elphaba on Wicked too. She was the only character i liked just because of her perfomance
I HATE that they tried to pull the “realism” card for the sake of an artificial conflict by mentioning gender roles and the hierarchy of power, because if those things were supposed to exist in this universe then Ella would’ve been hunted down and publicly beheaded for acting the way she did towards the king. Not even other royals would’ve gotten away with that level of disrespect lol.
P.S. I don’t give a fuck about how ahead of her time they wanted to make Ella seem, NO ONE in that timeline would say that balls are “antiquated”. Balls were just gatherings for rich people to socialise. It would be the equivalent of saying that going to a club or a party to meet new people is old-fashioned today.
I think we have to remember that "ahead of their time" isn't always "good" connotation, for the person who it's referring to that is. Hell for most of history it's pretty much a "they died because of..." referral. Bruno Giordano, Joan of arc, most of all the women tried in the Salem's witch hunts are few of many examples of "ahead of their time".
I feel the mix of realism with modern values come from the fantasy that we've all had of "if I appear randomly in - - - - I would be killing it with modern/hindsight knowledge" when really we would die of dysentery on week 1.
Edit: changed Galileo G. for Bruno Giordano, although Galileo did suffer consequences for his actions Bruno died by the hands of the church
@@ismaelrodriguez714 Galileo Galilei died of natural causes.
@@giacomoboin5248 what's that supposed to mean? Galileo was under house arrest until the day he died and every and any writing of his was forbidden from desimination and im pretty sure he was tortured while imprisoned based on that was what they did in the inquisition torture for the hell of it. all for suggesting the "sinful" idea that the earth wasn't the center of the univers
@@DingDingTheTH-camBuddy kinda, the church was alright with copernicus and Galileo, until they weren't and both their published work became forbidden later on Galileo was condemned to house arrest (after he went a bit punk-rock at the church). In actuality the astronomer Bruno Giordano was the one who was burned at the stake for his ideas of astronomy (the reason for his sentence is also debated but most of the weight seems to point at his astronomy) and now a days his fate is attributed wrongly to either galileo or copernicus
@@ismaelrodriguez714 you know the salem witch hunts was a case of MPI (mass hysteria) and a little bit of superstition, they didn’t even burn anyone alive like the major common misconception so no there weren’t any women ahead of their time there and frankly there weren’t many people ahead of their time in most you examples (except for joan d’arc), sure galileo was “ahead of his time” in terms of discovery’s and cientific intelligence but thats not the context I assume your are using the term “ahead of their time
Btw why do people need to change story’s of the past like cinderela and make it more “modern” instead of coming up with new ideas of strong female characters it just shows how lazy and uncreative the film industry is these day’s, but what can i say people love these half baked fiascos and they’l keep making them as it’s profitable and keeps the SJW happy….. so disappoing
Why the hell does every studio think making a ‘present-day remake’ means they need to fill every inch of dialogue with slang.
Immersion
@@doubleslothgaming well with the setting being somewhat dated, I don't think having all this slang without the appropriate setting wouldnt immerse me or others
@@yabazyabacoffee shhh, your breaking my already messed up immersion XD
@@doubleslothgaming ah shit my bad
@@yabazyabacoffee it's all good
First impression was that this movie is pulling the “diverse cast” card to get brownie points, more views, and bigger media attention. They think diversity = better movie which isn’t always the case.
Plus I think they’re forgetting that there’s already an amazing Cinderella movie with a diverse cast. It was made in 1997.
They don't care about profits, they're purposely destroying and replacing all of our modern mythology and classics. It's what Communists do.
@@gregoryl.levitre9759 'Communists' yes of course because the big Hollywood producers want to share the wealth.
@@gregoryl.levitre9759 so they went out and destroyed every last copy of Disney’s Cinderella as well as the fairy tale? That’s crazy.
@@ssharkbait lay off the cocaine. Brains work much better without cocaine.
@@mr.sentient7344 did Stalin or Mao share the wealth? Did the people in their direct network?
You really don't understand how any of this works.
So as a brit I'm ashamed so many of our comedians are in this! Especially Doc Brown. They did my man dirty.
“Comedians” who think yelling is funny.
Because every joke imaginable is offensive to someone somewhere now
Romesh ranganathan is rlly funny tho
@@user-md3nv8he7x You sensitive little snowflakes are so annoying man, give it a rest
@@user-md3nv8he7x feel you can be non "offensive"* and funny, it's just these films are so safe and bland no humour can be produced. It's like Christian stand-up where all they can do is fart and funny faces/accents.
Just wanted to respond because I feel "offensive" and non "offensive" humour can be funny(Monty Python is the only example I can name now) if they are played to actually have jokes and not just either comedies that are safe and bland "pc" humour or brazen shock humour that punches down on people as a punchline
*in "" because being offensive is really subjective and I feel it varies from person to person, cancelling people for making 5-10 year old jokes is not really what this is eluding to because that is honestly stupid and people who do that have no life imo
Yelling, doing funny face and dancing
Can we get Cinderella movies that just portray the time period correctly? I hate when they “modernize” older time periods because it makes no damn sense.
The Romeo and Juliet movie from the 90s was good. - A message from His Imperial and Royal Majesty, Kaiser Wilhelm der Große.
cinderella 2015 was also great
The problem is that there will always be some mfs who wants to modernise movies to fit today's standards and that their love for this movie exempts it from criticism or that Camila stans are simping her so hard theyre defending it to death
And also, don't forget another reason why this movie is created is because they want a progressive Cinderella who ''tackles misogyny '' or a '' realistic female empowerment ''
@@kaiserwilhelmdergrosse1871 lol, when I read that original comment you responded to my first thought was 'ugh, I still remember how weirded out I was when I saw that Romeo and Juliet movie!' Only watched it once in the cinema and although I really liked some of the songs it truly didn't sit right with me and the guys blasting Shakespeare lines while blasting guns in the same scene still has me questioning 'why?' all these years later.
it’s not the fact that they made the fairy god mother a gay black man… it’s the fact that the fully had to call him the FaBuLoUs god mother- like we get it, you’re breaking gender roles and blah blah blah
Ironic that this more “progressive” movie has some of the most disgusting stereotyping known to man. Geddit? Because he’s a FAIRY? Blech.
@@Dreigonix right ?!?? i know a lot of people say this, but that’s because it’s true- people who are left wing and consider themselves “progressive” are among the most racist people in the US!!
Wait, he’s actually gay? Believe it or not, I actually didn’t know that.
I don’t like that I laughed at the outro. Elvis, please.
Seeing you in other creator's comments is always suprising but never disappointing
@@potatokiller4188 exactly
It's always the creators you'll never think to see there.
I laughed like an absolute idiot, saw the timer, laughed some more, scrolled forward, then laughed again.
Lol, same. It's just so weird.
Ella Enchanted did the "fairy tale featuring a spontaneous musical number of 'Somebody To Love'" thing much better.
YES! It’s so weird to me that yet *another* modern take on Cinderella took the same song when it’s already been done so much better
The one with Amy Adams
@@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek No, that was Enchanted. Ella Enchanted starred Anne Hathaway.
truuu
Oooooh, thank you for noticing as well. Ella Enchanted seems to be much more creative than this one, based on what Elvis has presented.
her name being Ella is actually the usual case, Disney’s movie was the telling that made that become unknown. It’s supposed to be that they call her Cinderella because she sits by the cinders.
“Mom can we have Ella Enchanted?”
“No we have Ella Enchanted at home.”
Ella Enchanted at home:
Seriously!!! They even did the Somebody to Love scene. Who did they think they were fooling???
The Prince didn't really save her though, in the Disney version, the Fairy Godmother did, and then later she saves herself with the spare glass slipper. The Prince was just a bonus prize.
Exactly, in the original she just wanted to go to the ball have a good time
This is something everyone whom hates on the Disney version seems to completely miss, and one of the reasons why I like Cinderella the most out of all the Disney classics. So I hate to see her being the one given the most criticism when she's actually shown the most inner strength of every Disney princess written. Most in her situation would have a mental breakdown, or even be driven to suicide. But she stuck it out and managed to finally get her escape when the time came.
She didn't necessarily have to fight for it and be all "in your face" about things. But she got her freedom by maintaining her sense of self and taking any opportunities that came her way. And the prince aspect is probably the most significant part of it all: the prince fell for _her_ , not the other way around. All she did was accept it and get her freedom in the form of marriage. But she didn't actively pursue it; her only goal was to break free of her hard life. He just happened to be her way of doing it.
@@LoneGamerNerd regarding the fact that the prince fell for her; yeah, no kidding. The man is supposed to pursue the woman, and make the moves, and the woman either rejects or allows them
@@Kenfren what is this insensitive comment? Are you in the stone age? What's with your outdated thinking 🤢
@@Kenfren no..? why does the gender of the person matter..?
This honestly feels like a very expensive school play.
Exactly my thoughts, the cringe is strong
Don't compliment the writing of this movie in such a way.
I'd rather watch the school play
it really does though.
A *bad school play 🎭 😆
Scrubs had the best rules of a musical integration episode ever. Lady basically had some kind of disease that made her to see everyone singing musicals and they just played the episode from her perspective whenever they wanted to do a song and dance number.
Lucifer did it pretty well too, where the episode just had people burst into song cause God was there causing wacky shit to happen
never forget the OG Buffy episode where it was a mischievous demon
@@cloththesupervillain6094 that's lazy writing
Scrubs remains one of the best representations ever of what it’s like to be a resident, as all of the musical numbers, fantasies, and dream sequences can all be explained as the result of sleep deprivation.
6:01 In the original folk tale I think Cinderella didn't have a bed so she slept near the fire and woke up with cinders on her each morning. (But she doesn't do that in literally every remake so her name makes no sense in them)
Best ad break ever. The prince scream singing in flames immediately transitioned into an ad for the next Halloween with the house on fire and Laurie screaming "let it buuuuurn"
Lmao Nice!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The ad transition for me was a man standing in the same position just getting sprayed by water lmao
Maybe there is a fabulous godmother...
How did you get an ad about something interesting?
I love how every reviewer uses the phrase "movie for a new generation" as a placeholder of just saying "yeah, the writing is pure shit"
Key takeaway : new generation = pure shit
It's the nice way of saying "only people who never saw the better versions would like this"
i hate that phrase too because i remember movies like this when i was growing up and NOBODY liked them
And gives them an excuse to use lingo like "poppin" so they can try to be hip but it's just really really stupid since this movie is supposed to be under time era rules.
@@bmcfonzie as a gen z, i confirm it is true. We live in disappointment.
My expectations were literally below sea lvl and yet they still found ways to make the movie as cringe as possible. The only redeemable part was the king trying to woo his wife and the princess being a better girlboss then Ella could ever be
Girlbosses are cringe in general tho.
Also, people misinterpret this from the Disney movie all the time, but it's not the prince who uses the glass slipped to find Cinderella, it's the King's assistant, and he didn't see Cinderella up close, so his only standard is the slipper. Her having the other shoe is the bigger confirmation than fitting the slipper anyways.
Elvis is pumping out videos like never before and I couldn’t be more grateful.
Same
Yes.
Y e s
Likewise, we are eternally grateful for Elvis!
Yeah 👍
i swear this is a parody
I don't have any friends because they are ashamed of the videos I upload. Are they really that bad, dear ben
@@AxxLAfriku yes
@@AxxLAfriku they suck stop self promoting on everyone's vids you spas
I agree Benson
@AxxL you don't have friends because you self-promote.
A Guide to the Best Cinderella Adaptations, Which Already Did Anything This Film Did That Was Remotely Redeeming:
1) If you're looking for a version of Cinderella where she saves the prince equally with the prince saving her, try _Ever After_ (1998), _Cinderella_ (2015), or _Rodgers & Hammerstein's Cinderella_ (1997).
2) If you're looking for a version of Cinderella that's a better musical, and/or has a unique fairy godmother, try _Rodgers and Hammerstein's Cinderella_ (1997).
3) If you're looking for a version of Cinderella where she gets to know the prince before marrying him, try _Ever After_ (1998) or _Cinderella_ (2015).
4) If you're looking for a version of Cinderella in which the prince has his own story, try _Ever After_ (1998), _Cinderella_ (2015), or _Rodgers & Hammerstein's Cinderella_ (1997).
5) If you're looking for a version of Cinderella that is funny, try _Rodgers & Hammerstein's Cinderella_ (1997).
Personally, I'd recommend all three if you haven't seen them; they're classics.
A couple of other things, briefly:
The repressed dressmaker thing doesn't make any sense. Who, exactly, does this movie think were dressmakers in this historical period? Women have _always_ had jobs they could work, throughout history, and one of those jobs was as a dressmaker.
_and_
I've seen interesting speculation that the rap narrator guys were added to the film after principle photography. Apparently they're always kind of in their own frame, and they definitely stick out from the rest of the movie.
This ghastly, ghastly movie did achieve one thing - it showed that Pierce Brosnan would be perfect to play Tsar Nicholas II
In the original, Cinderella essentially saves herself because, despite her circumstances, she is able to endure and remains steadfastly virtuous, which leads to her being shown favor and given everything she ever wanted.
Agreed, she didn’t become jaded from her experiences.
Also someone being mistreated by what's essentially family wouldn't constantly be a snarky fuck to everyone
So the original is also more realistic despite the wilder magic part
she got even more than she ever wanted.
Ok, this movie seems to have a setting problem. What time period is this meant to be set in? There are horse drawn carriages and architecture from 18th century, instruments like a modern brass saxophone which is 19th-20th century, clothing that is more 15th-16th century, and phrases dating back to the Renaissance with "Hear ye, Hear ye!" On top of that, you have modern day lingo like "cray", "poppin'", etc. So that's different elements from an over 500+ year span.
It's as bad as that 2018 Robinhood movie where the character costumes were all over the place in terms of aesthetics. It had a villain wearing a modern 3 piece suit with a duster, Robinhood who looks like he is wearing a NorthFace jacket with a hood, and his sidekick who looks like he is wearing leftover clothes from the Star Wars prequels.
Robinhood made arrows look like bullets lol
And I don't the target audience of this movie won't notice that.
Also the steel bridge thingy the rappers stand on which is post-industrial at the earliest.
And at 15:46 there is a random tower that looks modern to me with the step out to give the appearance of machicolations but with no gap and as such isn't medieval and very much looks like a modern ahistorical imitation.
@@ratoh1710 you're right, good catch.
Yeah, it's a weird mishmash of everything. It's like they threw "historical royal posh stuff(s)" into a pot without rhyme or reason. It looks off and my brain keeps noticing it. The costumes are also all over the place.
Made me think about how they played “Turn Down for What” I the great gatsby
I’ve always wondered why Cinderella’s shoe doesn’t turn back into crap with the rest of the stuff. Like the prince would be left standing there holding a really shabby house slipper, maybe sniffing it a little..
5:47 Ooooo this part is actually interesting! In the original story, she is actually nicknamed cinderella because of that reason!
For an aspiring dressmaker, Cinderella creates some REALLY ugly outfits!
Lmao for real
Get some aloe vera for those burns Cinderella
She could get a job with Gypsy Brides.
Almost everyone at the ball is dressed better than her lmao
I mean, alot of 'fashion' is ugly af. The 'fabulous gs' dress is hideous.
The modern spin to the movie actually makes it worse in my opinion, it’s even more cringe
The whole "real name Ella nicknamed Cinderella" is a real thing from the original story, she would be so cold at night she would sleep in the fireplace after putting it out, so she would be covered in cinders and ash.
8:32 That clip caught me totally off-guard in the context. I was howling thinking about that troll-lady.
If her dressmaking skills are so great, why does she need a makeover at all? Why would the fairy godmother cringe at one of her designs but love another?
Because art is subjective
To be fair, most of her dress designs were genuinely pretty ugly.
It would've made sense if it was made up of rags or something and she didn't have the proper threads, but you're asking a lot from a movie made to entertain kids who enjoy cringy tiktoks
@@princesspeasant4536 I'll take your word for it, I haven't seen the movie
@@InternetPolice007 exactly
I mean… at least them making fun of Ella by calling her Cinder-Ella is actually true to the classic story (not the Disney remake, I mean the actual first edition of Cinderella). In the first editions her name genuinely was just Ella, and her stepfamily only called her Cinderella to make fun of how she’d be covered in cinders after cleaning the fireplace.
would've been nice if they backed that up with any sort of visuals lmao
@@ElvistheAlien lol literally- they kept pretty much nothing the same from the original story, the insult being one of the few exceptions, but they couldn’t even bother to actually back it up with even a little visual proof? It can’t be that hard to take a pinch of ash and rub it on her jaw.
Didn’t she actually not have a name at all? Her name was Cinder ella which translates to Cinder girl. They denigrated her by not even using a name, she was just the little cinder girl. The modernization of this used Ella as a name, since it’s actually a name now
@@CsillanRose that could very well be the case- I just know that I’ve read a couple of the older editions (I genuinely can’t remember the year to save a life, just knew that one of them were one of the few books my grandmother had kept from her childhood and the other one I had to read at the library because no one was allowed to check it out- it was in very poor condition and the only one of that edition they had) but even they could have just been spin-offs of an even older version.
This is one of the reasons why I love Cinderella so much! Even when I think I’ve already read some of the oldest versions of the story I find out that there’s likely even older ones 😆
the remake made it sound like a racial insult
“It’s so hard to hunt to Fox while you’re drunk”
That’s funny..cuz it’s so hard to watch this movie when I’m sober
Were doing Cinderella for our school play right now, and I realized how good the story is. Simple, beautiful, fun, and not too dramatic. Want a good Cinderella? The 1997 Cindrella is amazing, With Brandy and Whitney Houston.
Dude....I can't with this movie. The cringe was so bad that it ended up being funny, but then went right back round to being annoying, then cringey, then just straight up depressing.
Also, I don't get the hate for the original. The Stepmother was such an evil bitch in Cinderella's life and did everything in her power to make her miserable, while Cinderella did everything in HER power to stay positive and kind. Only when pushed to the breaking point did the Fairy Godmother help her out after her initial plans were ruined. I think the Prince was mainly to serve as an extra bonus for her, like "Wow, I managed to get out and have fun AND I met a hot guy on top of that" XD
Basically, just because she wasn't a "strong, badass bossgirl" doesn't mean she wasn't strong-willed and independent. She had an oppressive, abusive homelife but didn't lose faith in herself. If anything, it's a pretty powerful story of escaping abuse and living happily ever after.
(sorry, this was a weird, long sappy tangent. I just really like the original movie XD)
[EDIT: Holy crap, I didn't expect this comment to get such a reaction and discussion going. Thanks guys :D)
I never really thought about the Cinderella story like that. I used to not be very fond of Cinderella, but hearing this perspective makes me appreciate it: her reward for breaking the cycle of abuse was getting married to the Prince
People hate classic Disney because of the social norms of today. Boo we don't need a MAN to save us. It actually ruined future disney movies, which is weird that they're now bashing the very movies that paid to CGI everything. I can't speak for everyone else, but when I was younger, I wasn't sitting around pissed at the romance or damsel in distress troupe, I was mad at how much of a huge bitch her stepmothers were, and I wanted to fight the sisters for ripping her dress apart.
Damn right. The original she tried so hard to be positive and moving on, UNTIL that one great plan she had been working on was deliberately destroyed by the stepmother.
The 1950s Cinderella didn't have much agency in the plot. She needed the mice to make her first dress. Needed a fairy god mother to make the second dress. Needed the mice and dog to get her out of the locked room. The prince did absolutely nothing and didn't even have a name.
By the way, this new film was not made by Disney, its not a "remake".
@@kyrtuck Of course the original Cinderella had little agency. She was an orphan who was manipulated for years into living a life of servitude by her emotionally/physically abusive step-family with no real world job skills other than cooking and cleaning and her only friends were mice and farm animals. She had nowhere to go, no one to turn to and no street smarts, so she chose to make the best out of her shitty situation.
Plus, the 3rd Cinderella sequel (A Twist in Time), where Cinderella actually does everything she could to win her happy ending, retconned everything that happened in the first film altogether anyway, so its stupid to make that argument at this point.
Imply that one of the step-sisters is racist when, in fact, Cardoor Caballeros was racist to her group mate from Fifth Harmony. Yup.
Hollywood is not known for ethical consistency. 🙂
Truly ironic
Wait what I’ve never heard of that
GOOGLED IT apparently she said the n word on a tumblr account how the fuck do you get away with that on tumblr
@@Shrekfromthehitmovieshrek you know why
who is c. caballeros?
*Why’d they do this to Doc Brown* ? (the “Hear Ye” guy) he’s an actual decent rapper / comedian and did a track for Ricky Gervais.. they did everybody dirty wit this.
I can't specify how well Joker laughing clips go with this movie. It really seems like the kind of movie where the sense of humour can make you develop paradoxical laughter syndrome
this movie is 2 hours and 41 minutes!!! Seriously YIKES!!!
so this movie is 2 hours and and 31 minutes to long lol
That’s torture
Almost 3hrs?!
Oh nah...
Per Wikipedia it's 113 minutes, or 1 hr 53 min. Am I missing something?
Yeah I’d rather spend that time in an ice bath…
It's a real feminist movie when she can't even sell her own dress and need the man to buy it/save her lmao.
Lol so much for not needing a man to save you. I wish his sister was the one who came out and bought it herself. But no
You know. I used to think "I'm old now. The world is leaving me behind." Because of how movies were getting grating and unwatchable. Now I'm... kinda thinking that movies just kinda left the world behind instead? Literally who is asking for this mess?
Like... genuinely. This just reskins that whole "wait for prince charming" with "Wait for the ability to suddenly have a job you care about take off!" You know... people thought it was silly to wait for prince charming to just sweep them off their feet. Are we not supposed to feel silly that a job we care about will just... work? That we won't forever be stuck doing what we hate so we can scrape by? It feels..... insulting, honestly.
i agree😔
My heart breaks for all these genuinely funny Taskmaster alumni who had to suffer through this shit to pay their rent this month.
I hope Greg awards them bonus points.
The "cinder"ella cinder on her face thing is actually going back to the original tale. Emphasizing that not only was she forced to do all the dirty work around the house, but when she got dirty from doing it, her family would use that to put her down as well.
Yeah, that's what I thought too. But this movie should have put on some dirt on the actress to be realistic if they were going to recall that fact from the original tale. Now it just seems like everyone is making fan of her skin colour......wait maybe that's what they were going for. Who knows with all these remakes.
Funny part being they didn't even do that in this movie, was rather lackluster in 'cinder'
The dress part would be cool if it wasn't for the fact that most women in that time period made dresses
Its not just making dresses, she wants to revolitionize the world by geing a badass boss queen who makes her own money
@@sbel6626 i'm pretty sure women made money off their dresses back then
@@sbel6626
But most women made money back then, even from home.
The concept of the traditional housewife wasn't really a thing in the lower-middle classes until the industrial revolution.
And it wasn't even widespread until the 1920s.
@@sbel6626 And? Do you only qualify as a "girlboss" by making money and revolutionizing the world? If that's the case then maybe 5% of women will ever be a "girlboss"
I think it's pretty insulting that people insinuate that's all it takes. What of the women who actually became a housewife to raise their children? Or women who don't have the right to even go to school, but hold secret meetings that they could get executed for? Are they any less?
I'm sorry I kinda went off on you, but I hate the mentality of "to be a truly influential woman, you have to be 'x' in your society." Because it defeats the whole purpose of the original feminist movement.
You've got a great point. Seamstresses were a thing. I think fashion houses and celebrity fashion designers are a relatively modern thing
When your attempt at updating a work involves repeatedly making fun of it and showcasing all the ways you've "fixed" it then it isn't an update; it's a hate letter.
This sounds like a Cinderella adaptation by people embarrassed to be making a Cinderella adaptation.
I miss when there was only the animated movies and people wouldn't humiliate themselves over this
Hey. Drew Barrymore did great in Ever After
But there was never only the animated movies, there’s always been live action Cinderella movies even before the Disney one.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 And this is one of - if not the worst
@@LukeLovesRose oh trust me honey you have seen NOTHING.
Don’t tell me you have seen an awful Cinderella movie until you see the shit I’ve seen.
I’ve seen Cinderella but he’s a white guy from the Bronx who raps, I’ve seen Cinderella but she’s a wannabe country music star from Nashville, I have seen Cinderella but she’s an athro elk who just so happens to be a cowboy who falls in love with a dog.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 Yikes. I had no idea
This was one hell of a taskmaster challenge for Acaster and Romesh
And Doc Brown too. I guess we know where they send the losers now.
@@Sandal-Socks dont forget Rob Becket aswell
Just gotta wait and see who gets the 5 points now I guess
It's like if they'd got literally any other British comedian other than Corden they might have had a half-decent dynamic without the irritating Corden nonsense like idk Josh Widdicombe maybe.
@@frislander4299 and if they wanted one mouse who was basically purposefully annoying to some extent they could have found one to do that kind of character way better.
"It's how old people say poppin."
Here I thought that was
"I'm Merry Poppin's, y'all"
"Then fap G uses his magic to make it come alive on Cinderella"
Well... THERE'S an image.
I mean, in the Disney movie she also makes her own dress, but the sisters and stephmother ruin it, then the godmother spawns another. So it's not that innovative at all.
The whole "Ella" thing was done in Ella Enchanted, but I always thought they called her Cinderella because she was always covered in cinders from laying by the fireplace because she didn't have a proper room. That's sort of what they did in Ever After anyway, but she was always sleeping by the fireplace because she liked to read at night in that version.
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that in the original story Cinder-ella was an insult as one of her chores was to clean out the fireplace, so she would be covered in ash. So ye.
In that case they should have shown it though. A movie has a budget for a reason so getting some makeup to show instead of just only telling in hopes the viewer would not pay attention would have made more sense
Her name was Ella but they called her Cinderella cause Cinder are another words for ashes, which she cleaned up. Drew Barrymores Ever After was much better than this pile of crap and the costumes!
Why was is the Fairy dressed better than Cinderella at a ball?
@@randomusername1735 Right? The actress looked like she had permanent nude make-up on. Her skin and hair was flawless. Couldn't they have smeared some ash over her?
I remember when old Disney movies came out and the whole family enjoyed them.
Now, these kids have grown up, started to despise what social media did to them and for some reason, film makers think the only way to make a successful movie is appeal to the kids' "favorite" things, social media. Now only really young kids enjoy the movie and they're the ones that are obsessed with social media.
Can we just get normal movies that everyone can somewhat enjoy and not fill it with parody style writing that no one can tell if it's meant to be serious or a joke.
Old Disney was just magical. 😍😍😍
Tell you what, let's just stay away from crap like this and stick to the ones from established directors. Let gen z enjoy this for now and realise later that it was crap.
right??? im sick of movie companies trying to overtly appeal to ONLY 3 year olds. making a movie that the parents could enjoy too is what makes a movie great. this shit is just trash.
@@frandlynn6490 What do you mean? This movie has an incredible amount of "funny on social media" or viral schtick in it. It's like it was created by tiktok to sell their site.
tho i will argue i had films like this growing up that tried to appeal to the "young hip kids" and most of us HATED them. we preferred waynes world and even the fonz was still popular when i was in school (left school around 2014-2015 something like that)
This has some of the most underrated British talent in it and is being so so SO woefully wasted and I didn’t even realise
Fun fact, it’s not just in this movie, the original premise is that her name is Ella and her face is covered in cinders and ash from cleaning the fireplace making her Cinderella, and the movie Ella Enchanted also did it with a MUCH better rendition of somebody to love
This feels like a direct to DVD movie Disney would’ve made in like 2006, in 2021
This is TOO accurate. I can literally see that being a thing.
It was direct to Amazon Prime.
Funny enough, there actually was actually 2 Cinderella sequels (2002 + 2007) and they both happen to be better than this pile of mouse turds
Damn literally everyone has something to say about this version of Cinderella AND NONE OF IT IS GOOD 😂
Preach, I haven't heard a single positive review about this movie!
@@trinaq I haven't heard a single positive sentence about this movie yet. I'm kind of tempted to put it on, but I think I'll enjoy reviews more.
The movie, characters, writing, actors, etc speak for itself
@@trinaq was it from a cast members mother
Right? Ive lost count of how many reviews have popped up and literally no one liked it 😂
I wish someone would make a movie of the actual version.
Teacher: "What noise does a racecar make"
That one kid: 16:51
I hate when people modernize history just to make them look like shit
I mean I doubt this movie was trying to be historical, you just watched a butterfly turn in a black gay man in a dress.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 But that's every historical film or show now. Since they colorblind a lot the cast because it would look racist if everyone is white even if it's an historical. I don't think we will ever see a show like vikings when it comes to casting.
@@Ilovegrunge123 but why does it matter the cast has Poc in the movie as main roles? It’s a fairytale movie with magic in it where mice turn into humans and glass isn’t breakable.
It’s not trying to be super historically accurate and thus can cast a lot of non white people as the characters.
Why is it so important to you that the main cast be all white people in a movie where it doesn’t matter? It especially makes sense for fairytale movies since around the world tons of different cultures has different versions of fairytales.
There’s super old versions of Cinderella where everyone is Asian and nobody complains about how that wouldn’t be accurate.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 I was referring to all historical shows not just fantasy. But there is a double standard though when it's a fantasy about ancient Egypt the whole it's a fantasy setting the best actor the job is the best for the role doesnt apply.
Cinderella isn't historical LMAO
Do you honestly believe that a story with fairies turning mice into butlers and pumpkins into carriages is historical. But, suddenly, when there's a black person, it's unrealistic?
How pathetic are you?
This movie is the equivalent of having a stomach ache in the middle of your way to work and you're too far from your house to go back and too far from your work to feel relief about the whole situation. So you just stay there, clutching your butthole so the diarrhea stays in and hoping for the best outcome.
Oddly specific but accurate feeling.
I was watching this video on my TV, and I'm 100% sure I got an ad for this exact movie before it played.
Perfect
You know what I'd like to see? A modern retelling of sleeping beauty
She didn't design her ballroom dress. The fairy did, that's his work. She's taking credit because her dresses are ugly in comparison
@Tiramisu Desu the only one I liked was the bald black girl in the black dress. That was it
wasn’t cinderella originally a pretty good seamstress? at least in the og movie?
@@lgbtqiarights I honestly don't remember, but if she was, she's probably better than this one
@@ihatetheheat4524 definitely jaja
@@lgbtqiarights yes shewas! She makes a beautiful pink dress from what the sisters didn't want, but her family destroyed it bc it was prettier than their stuff!
The girl boss thing tho ruins CINDERella .... She's supposed to be treated awful. Yeah she could have aspirations but the whole heavy handed aspect of it is so cringe
Yes. I said the same thing when the movie started and she's so happy and confident... When you start a movie where the main character is already emotionally where they should be at the end, you really have no where else to go.
Everafter did it well
Also the animated Disney version, that this movie is taking shots at, kind of empowers abuse victims? Because despite everything that she's constantly going through (which is a **lot** worse than what they do to ella in this modern take) she remains optimistic and kind. And, she never wanted a prince specifically, she wanted to leave her old life behind and go to the ball, and happened to fall in love there (and she didn't know the guy was a prince then). Idk, imo Disney's animated Cinderella is not some passive, anti-feminist icon or anything, she was just a regular girl who needed another person's help to get away from her horrendously abusive family and found love along the way, nothing wrong with that.
“In this one Cinderella’s name is Ella and they gave her the Cinder part because she’s covered in cinders”
…I love you Elvis, but that’s kinda ALL the Cinderellas?
Pierce Brosnan is actually a really good singer, he’s in Mama Mia
"Representation" doesn't mean shit when you have a stereotypical black gay man existing solely to help a straight light-skinned woman's love quest.
This is why the 1997 version, even though it has problems, was still a better step forward. It was also fun and not depressing like this version.
yeah the "magical ne'gro" geez....has been around for ages and it's still here
Yeah not only that he's a gay man...playing a fairy...wasn't calling someone a fairy used to insult gay people back then like um what were the directors thinking exactly?
This fell under the radar, because I didn’t even know this came out.
Gaddamn your name
@@shravan1005 😎👌
Wish I stayed under that radar, this films sucks and is at least 1000 leagues below the original(comparing the two isn't even fair imo)
Lucky you, for the two weeks prior to this coming out I couldn't escape the damn ads promoting its release. If I wasn't so bombarded I would've been at least curious to watch it, but by the time it was available I was sick of it lmao
@@LeilaleilaZ you’ve gotten ads for this thing? I haven’t gotten any at all.
And people were saying this was better than the original fairytale 🥲😭 nothing will beat the original, just remember people, if the original didn’t exist your other favorite versions wouldnt have came out
@Killer Koala Cultured person, I see. ✨
Anyone saying that needs booted off this fucking planet.
@Killer Koala so you like the black version because your black? Great reasoning SHEEP 🐑 👏
what about the brothers Grimm version?
@@springwoodslasher79 It's a genuinely good film. It has nothing to do with skin color...
9:14 I thought the evil stepmother stabbed cinderella at this shot.
1:55 Idina Mendel is an ICON, mostly for people into musicals (Wicked, Glee, Frozen…)
I blame TikTok for making an entire generation think that all you have to do for people to like something is to do a goofy dance and act like drunk sorority girls.
"OMG, that is lit AF, bitch!"
The only Cinderella live action worth watching imo is Ever After with Drew Barrymore. It's by far the most original of any of them.
facts!
Plus it's an amazing movie on its own.
SO TRUE! Ever after is one of my fave movies it was so good ! That’s super original and a great spin on the Cinderella story
Y’all remember Nickelodeon’s Rags? It was an amazing genderbent modern Cinderella story
Totally agree
A Knight's Tale is the only medieval movie that blends modern stuff well.
Ever After is pretty good.
The bit at the end with the fabulous godmother had me in tears 😂
1997 and original Disney version will always be the best ones
Ever After?
Hillary Duff's is a good one where they didn't fail with the whole modern twist thing
Yes, except they both suck ass compared to the actual original
Always
@@kreuz7sieben Which one? Do you have any idea how many Cinderella stories there are around the world?
Perhaps I’m wrong, but gender roles in Royalty were kinda moot once an heir was chosen, it was about the divine right to rule, and royalty were seen as above the common man (or woman). There were plenty of empresses and queens that exercised just as much, if not more power when ruling. Arranged marriages sorta work for this I guess, but even then that was primarily political, and was primarily among aristocracy or to spread a given families influence. You did not question the king or queen, unless you were the court jester, and if you were a possible heir you were mostly worried about avoiding being offed by siblings or other political movers.
I was in tears upon realising the main issue everyone seems to have with her is that she wants to be a seamstress.
They still were considered to have less legitimacy than their male counterparts.
It really depends. Every country follows (or followed) different rules and so being a heir didn't always protected from gender roles
Example: in Poland a queen was a king's wife. We've never had a ruling queen but we had one female king. It's complicated. We also had elected kings before democracy was once again popular in Europe. In this case there were no heirs pefiod. Kings had to bribe voters with more and more outrageous promises. For some strange reasons all of the elected kings were male. I wonder why
You're unfortunately wrong. I watch a lot of docs and read a lot about monarchy and the gender matters in most cases.
Actually no. In Poland there was a period of free elections. Title of king wasn't Inherited by the next of kin, but king was chosen by electorate of nobles - sometimes it was even someone from abroad like Lithuania, Hungary or even Sweden. :)
edit: it was actually genius in some ways. no incest and morons that came with inbreeding, no stupid dividing of country among heirs, but... nobles were easy to corrupt
11:53 was the best part of this movie...and that even not the part of its...
"FAIRY" Godmother. Lol such a fitting name.
Isnt it weird that 2 germans, who wrote some fairy tales they heird from some strangers, caused things like THIS?
Oh and the originals from the Grimm brothers are actually pretty brutal.
Actually grimm brothers didn’t write anything, they collected fairytales.
Charles Perrault is usually credited with writing Cinderella BUT the story has existed for thousands of years before it, even dating all the way back to egypt.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 they should make one from the POV from one of the 400 rejected girls. XD
Make the sisters dance in burning coal shoes ❤️
All these different version and we _still_ haven't had one where the evil stepsisters get their eyes plucked out by Cinderella's doves. Such a lost opportunity.
@@cinderellaskeleton6720 I said this by "they heird from strangers"
I totally feel you on that princess being annoyed at his singing when no one else is. That's a big no-no as it heavily breaks immersion, as you clearly experienced.
As someone whose favorite princess is Cinderella.
This hurts me.
This movie was a woke mashup. That's it. They took the "framework" of "Cinderella" and just CRAMMED woke nonsense down our throats! That's LITERALLY the movie. You see, Disney has been doing these live action versions of the classics, and I thought THIS was gonna be THAT. But it wasn't. It was straight up PROPAGANDA. It was gross. 🤢🤮
I did not need to see Cordon's junk swinging around like that, nobody does... 😖And to show the clip multiple times... 😭 You're Killin' me Elvis.
Seeing that ungodly image took years off my life.
I wish the driver flung his door open as hard as he could straight into his junk.
I feel like every role he takes and everything he does is a barely contained expression of self loathing
the fact that the intro wasnt
Cinderelli
Cinderelli
This isnt Mom's Spaghetti
will forever haunt me
0:21 is the absolute best part. I just can't stop laughing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣