Atheist Defends Biologist From An Atheist Whack (Again)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ย. 2023
  • He likes to 'whack' things a lot... our 'favourite' creationist, Dr Dino, has another go at the‪@RenegadeScienceTeacher‬, Forrest - AGAIN! And I KNOW Forrest doesn't need me to step in and 'whack back' Kenty, but he;'s a busy man, and someone needs to put a high pitched voice changer on Kent and point out some of the things he says are actually pretty stupid.
    The Original Video is here - th-cam.com/users/liveFz2CghtF...
    Here's the Previous Forrest Whacking - • Atheist Defends Biolog...
    More Hovind Hilarity - • Hovind Hilarity
    ** T-Shirts Are Here - my-store-cf9db1.creator-sprin... **
    Patreon - / theskeptick
    Facebook - / theskeptick
    Instagram - / theskeptick
    Twitter - / the_skeptick
    TikTok - tiktok.com/theskeptick
    Everything in this video is just an opinion, and should be treated as such - though it is important to ask questions. Any humour or sarcasm is aimed towards the words and actions of the individuals, and not intended to be a personal attack on any individual themselves, under the act of free speech
    Title - Atheist Defends Biologist From An Atheist Whack (Again)
    Tags - atheist,atheism,religion,forrest valkai,kent hovind,whack an atheist,agnostic,proof of evolution,evolution is fake,how to prove god,is there proof of god,kent hovind whack an atheist,is atheism wrong,atheism is wrong,is atheism right,are atheists right,how to debunk atheists,biology,is evolution real,proof evolution is false,renegade science teacher,whacking back,proof of god,creationist vs atheist,atheist vs creationist,big bang

ความคิดเห็น • 864

  • @GalaxySid
    @GalaxySid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +379

    Defending Forrest from Kent is like defending Mike Tyson from a five year old. Well, a five year old could at least do... something.

    • @Commander_Appo
      @Commander_Appo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      A child could give you rabies without them having ever been bit by an animal

    • @Viktor_Git
      @Viktor_Git 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Commander_AppoBro, WTF 🤣🤣🤣

    • @jameshall1300
      @jameshall1300 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      ​@@Viktor_Gitas a father of two, I can confirm that kids can make you rabid without ever having been bitten. They are both a blessing and a curse.

    • @jonnawyatt
      @jonnawyatt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or Mike Tyson from a rape victim

    • @gypsylee333
      @gypsylee333 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's gonna need to defend Forrest from me, cuz it's on sight. Forrest is a horrible enemy of children, women, and Western society with his Gender Woo, sterilizing gays and mutilating children.

  • @chrispysaid
    @chrispysaid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

    Congratulations, you somehow made Kent more difficult to listen to

    • @DJTony993
      @DJTony993 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Agreed.

    • @tmchugh1983
      @tmchugh1983 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The downside being that I stopped watching the video about 5 seconds after he started speaking when I realised it was going to be like that throughout the entire video! Too annoying to listen to over any length of time.

    • @Princess_Jessie3414
      @Princess_Jessie3414 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Idk man, it's preferable

    • @bodan1196
      @bodan1196 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Just saw a reaction video on the movie "Who Framed Roger Rabitt".
      The main villain... the voice... the crazy stare... I wonder; coincidence, or God pulling one over?

    • @alexanderingraham8255
      @alexanderingraham8255 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Disagree. After having been on a Kent Hovind debate kick, this is positively soothing lol

  • @weerwolfproductions
    @weerwolfproductions 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Don't call him doctor. His dissertation wouldn't even have been accepted as an essay in high school. He bought his degree.

    • @jackwhite8238
      @jackwhite8238 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Accepted

    • @Ajhcr
      @Ajhcr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Didn’t he get his “degree” from one of those religious universities that are not accredited?

    • @paulglennie1991
      @paulglennie1991 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Ajhcr no, he paid for his diploma from a diploma mill like those who try to lie about thier studies when trying to enter usa for so called uni studies.
      Which can be seen as fraud

    • @weerwolfproductions
      @weerwolfproductions 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jackwhite8238 Thanks! The two sound very much the same and I often notice it when other people make the same mistake but didn't proof read my own post well enough this time to notice it 🙂

    • @weerwolfproductions
      @weerwolfproductions 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Ajhcr Indeed. Last time someone checked it was a single person writing out diplomas from an 'office' located in the hallway of a double-wide.

  • @verdatum
    @verdatum 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    Massive bro-Crush on Forrest. When he gets excited about explaining a thing, it's so satisfying.

    • @enki354
      @enki354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ain't it

    • @SevenQs
      @SevenQs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Forrest is so passionate about education it’s heartwarming to see I feel you

  • @symantares9171
    @symantares9171 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Kent is claiming victory while actively proving Forrest's point. That tracks for him

    • @Cookie_85
      @Cookie_85 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It's litteraly playing chess with a pigeon.

    • @capnd.g.4711
      @capnd.g.4711 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Most of (if not all of) Kent's arguments can be disputed with his own arguments....

    • @EdwardHowton
      @EdwardHowton 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Some people fight straw men.
      Some people tilt at windmills.
      Kent engages in shadow boxing.
      And *loses.*

    • @horusrage
      @horusrage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Kent rarely understands the point being given to him. Even if you spoon-feed it.

    • @iwkaoy8758
      @iwkaoy8758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kent is talk king a bot recessive genes/genetic regression.
      Recessive genes cause (Recessive changes) How does diss proves any moles have a common ancestor? Common ancestory rie choirs any moles two (gain) knew features,Witch is de Op poe sit of genetic regression.

  • @jpstardom3375
    @jpstardom3375 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Kent hovind is a blessing to the world.
    He is one of the biggest contributors to the growth of atheism.
    And he is helping people by showing them the path away from religion.
    Thank you kent, may you rest in pisces.

  • @AbstractStew
    @AbstractStew 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    The voice changer makes it more difficult for me to understand Kent Hovind. You are right. Not being able to understand him, does make him a little more bearable. 1:57

  • @BetterThanEmber
    @BetterThanEmber 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    At least Kent agrees that religion is not a path to knowledge

  • @davidcarney1533
    @davidcarney1533 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    To be fair, Kent's voice isn't annoying, it's his condescending cadence that annoys me

    • @MF______
      @MF______ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Don't forget: He's insufferably smug, too.

    • @2l84me8
      @2l84me8 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Eh, it’s both.

  • @infinitedragonbellyx.x
    @infinitedragonbellyx.x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    "Someone has a little crush on Forrest?" But like, who doesnt? Handsome, incredibly smart and seems like such a kind and genuine dude.

    • @Chara_Lar
      @Chara_Lar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😳🫣 🤫

  • @BlackburnBigdragon
    @BlackburnBigdragon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    I've never... EVER... EVER... seen Hovind actually be able to directly answer any question asked of him by someone. He will always go off on all kinds of tangents and deflect, and by the time he gets to the question again, he's created a complete strawman of the entire topic of the question, and he answers that. It's easy to answer questions when you just change what the question actually is.

    • @NazgulGnome
      @NazgulGnome 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's one of his primary arguing tactics. It's called a gish gallop.

    • @dullahaut329
      @dullahaut329 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@NazgulGnome while people like Kent use Gish Gallops constantly, that's not a Gish Gallop.
      A Gish Gallop is a dishonest argument tactic where they prey on the difference in effort required to make bad points vs debunk them, by throwing out as many terrible ideas as possible so their interlocutor appears to have lost simply by not having enough time to get to them all satisfactorily.

    • @NewNecro
      @NewNecro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@dullahaut329 Gish gallop is a rapid succession of arguments but the uses of it cover far more than that.
      It can also be used to "switch gears" on a point that wasn't originally addressed (like here the irrelevant tangent over big bang) to change to a different topic to dodge a question someone would otherwise be pressured to answer.
      Besides the debunk effort vs number of arguments it can also overload the conversation to the point the gish galloper can claim in good faith to losing track of their own conversation when getting caught on strawmanning the original question halfway through. (Tho Kent does that from the start, other apologists/debaters have more class when doing that.)

    • @ericvulgate
      @ericvulgate 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Waaaait a minute-
      Are u a dirty evolution-ist??

    • @ritchie6162
      @ritchie6162 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah a Gish gallop is a VERY common tactic for creationists. They know they don’t have any arguments against the science anymore so they just rapid-fire a bunch of scientific words in a way that makes the science sound ridiculous, when it takes time to explain the processes, in order to confuse and control the narrative to an uneducated audience.

  • @mrapistevist
    @mrapistevist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Hovind isn't qualified to comment on Forrest.

    • @georgem2334
      @georgem2334 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Hovind isn't qualified to comment on anything.

    • @mrapistevist
      @mrapistevist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@georgem2334 Tru dat.

    • @jameshall1300
      @jameshall1300 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@georgem2334hes qualified to speak on how to harbor a child molester. That's about it.

    • @yippieskippy2971
      @yippieskippy2971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍🖖

    • @mrapistevist
      @mrapistevist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yippieskippy2971 :)

  • @Draconae
    @Draconae 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    If Kent ever debated Forrest, Kent wouldn't be prepared for that.

    • @alanhyland5697
      @alanhyland5697 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh no, Kent is completely prepared. Pro-theist platform, change topics every 10 seconds, gish-gallop over everyone's brain and talk over his opponent when it's their turn to speak.

    • @Viktor_Git
      @Viktor_Git 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Kent wasn't even prepared for his own video🤣

    • @BlackburnBigdragon
      @BlackburnBigdragon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Kent would get beaten to the floor and he would be declaring victory as he was laying there.

    • @CyberBeep_kenshi
      @CyberBeep_kenshi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      even if forest didn't know he had to debate him 1 minute after waking up, it still wouldn't matter. mr kent knows nuthin....

    • @naruarthur
      @naruarthur 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if we made a "surprise" debate with forrest, blindfolding him and telling he would go to a science convention or something, just to put him in a live show against hoving totally unprepared, he would still demonstrate every single lie hovind tells only using his memory... great, now i do want that, somebody quick, get forrest blindfolded in a car

  • @STaRBG4405
    @STaRBG4405 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Forest: Here is a design problem
    Kent: Some people dont have the problem therefore god
    Me: Huh?

  • @DinosaurianDude
    @DinosaurianDude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Nobody is surprised that a convicted physical abuser bases his segment on physically beating his opponents, instead of just disproving them.

  • @echojay_et
    @echojay_et 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I wished you had put a disclaimer “Kent will say warm vagina” 🤮🤢🤮🤢 that was traumatizing 😂😂😂

    • @catherinecox573
      @catherinecox573 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Thanks for the warning fam 🙏 because of you, I was able to spiritually prepare myself, bless

    • @kynkokytsumi1931
      @kynkokytsumi1931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      *shudders* ... scarred for life here

    • @echojay_et
      @echojay_et 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@catherinecox573 just trying to minimize the trauma 🫡

    • @echojay_et
      @echojay_et 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kynkokytsumi1931 all I can say is be mentally prepared 🫣

  • @LarkLaTroy
    @LarkLaTroy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    At last, a Kent voice that works. Thank you. I finally got through a Kent rebuttal without my ears bleeding.

  • @psyseraphim
    @psyseraphim 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Kent's debate with Conspiracy Catz was amazing.... "I wasn't prepared for that" 😂

    • @TheSkepTick
      @TheSkepTick  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I haven’t seen that one and I very much need to

  • @DataRae-AIEngineer
    @DataRae-AIEngineer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    This is one of the best Kent Hovind videos ever made. Thanks for making it!

  • @chris_troiano
    @chris_troiano 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Forrest debates on his call-in show frequently. He’s not scared, Kent, he’s just not that into you.

  • @ferretfather2000
    @ferretfather2000 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    kent doesnt want to debate he wants to interrupt. He wants to say "no, youre wrong" as his ONLY argument

    • @tressonkaru7410
      @tressonkaru7410 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. He wants to be right. Flat earthers. Creatist. They want to be right. That's not how a debate works.

  • @vinnyganzano1930
    @vinnyganzano1930 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Every time Kent the ex-con opens his mouth he puts his foot in it.
    You'd think someone would tell him.

  • @Cat_Woods
    @Cat_Woods 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    Although the voice change was somewhat entertaining, it didn't make Kent any less insufferable.

    • @skandragon586
      @skandragon586 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      covering up his misplaced arrogance and condensation will take much more than that

    • @TheLithp
      @TheLithp 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I have a harder time understanding what he's saying.

    • @freddan6fly
      @freddan6fly 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheLithp it is Nuh-hu and god-dun-it

    • @chameleonx9253
      @chameleonx9253 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@TheLithpYou're right, it is much better!

    • @zemoxian
      @zemoxian 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      As I suspected, Chipmunk Hovind is just as hard to like as Kent. It’s not the voice. The content is what’s annoying.
      I stopped the video half way as he was going on about antediluvian fan fiction characters having kids in their 60’s. As if long lived mythical people are scientific evidence.
      Ignoring the fact that Genesis is a reboot of older fantasy fictions from older cultures, whose characters may have lived like 10 times longer-where’s the scientific evidence that backs the claims that any of that book is real? Or is it just presupposition that everything in Genesis is true and anything in the real world contradicting it is false?

  • @TheNightmareRider
    @TheNightmareRider 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Kent's entire reason is just "this changed because magic." Followed but an argument from personal incredulity.

    • @nagranoth_
      @nagranoth_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      not sure "cough... that's stupid!" counts as an argument.

    • @tyemaddog
      @tyemaddog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yet here we are magically. Big bang, timing of evolution, all miracle territory

    • @RaccoonAvenger
      @RaccoonAvenger 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What so you meen sir? We are perfect beings!
      Now where is my glasses and ptsd meds?

    • @NewNecro
      @NewNecro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tyemaddog Neither are miracles though, because miracle implies an intervention on something otherwise usual or expected. Evolution and big bang are themselves natural expectations we derive from available data.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tyemaddog "Yet here we are magically. Big bang, timing of evolution, all miracle territory"
      we are naturally here. That's why nobody can demonstrate what magic is, let alone that magic played any role in the natural phenomena you mentioned.
      calling the Big Bang a miracle is just g0dofthegapsing. Just like we used to call thunder a trick of several deities. Which deity was it? ALWAYS the one we were indoctrinated to believe in. NO culture used the thunder deity of another culture.

  • @CookiesRiot
    @CookiesRiot 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    How in actual hell did he come up with the new set of teeth at 100? Not only have numerous people lived well past that in modernity without new teeth, but does he even know how adult teeth come in?
    They're in the jaw already when you're a child! Where's the third set, Kent?!

    • @iwkaoy8758
      @iwkaoy8758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hue man were create Ted width three rows of teeth,but hue men's jaws are smaller bee cause of genetic regression. Know were four dim two fit inn modern times. That's why wisdom teeth hurt some pea pole.

  • @vine1313
    @vine1313 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I LOVE Scotty Wartooth, AKA TikTok Jesus. The fact that he makes people mad, while being an atheist, makes my heart smile!

  • @stevenpike7857
    @stevenpike7857 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You can't argue or reason with someone that uses magic as an explanation for things happening.

  • @pigpuke
    @pigpuke 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    "It's amazing what religion can do when you just IMAGINE" - ftfy Kent. Imagination is the realm of religion. Science doesn't imagine things, science is the exact opposite of imagination.

    • @weerwolfproductions
      @weerwolfproductions 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't agree. Science is also progressing when people with imagination think of a new concept and work out how to make it possible. Without science fiction, our progress in science would have been far slower.

    • @pigpuke
      @pigpuke 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@weerwolfproductions Inspiration and imagination are very similar but there is a difference.

    • @guytheincognito4186
      @guytheincognito4186 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@pigpuke
      They have a field of science that's called theoretical physics. It's neccesary to have Imagination there even though it also has to hold concordant to known laws and maths ,to find new innovative ways to understanding the physics we have and find new elements of physics and ways to design and use technologies. 💁‍♂️

    • @iwkaoy8758
      @iwkaoy8758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How dew you know amoeba came from minerals width out imaging? How de you know de Eunie verse came from know ting width out imaging?
      Yes, science does ant imagine,but evolutionism does.

    • @guytheincognito4186
      @guytheincognito4186 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iwkaoy8758
      Please use Google translate. It's bad but not that bad./

  • @CrankyQuokka
    @CrankyQuokka 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Watching Hovind is like watching the proverbial train wreck. It's an awful thing, but you can't look away...

    • @JustCameronAndHisJeep
      @JustCameronAndHisJeep 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ha ha - he is an actual proverbial train wreck. Literally!

    • @jemborg
      @jemborg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think he repeats himself a lot.

    • @capnd.g.4711
      @capnd.g.4711 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's disturbing yet fascinating. I've never been so unnerved by a person and still couldn't still couldn't stop giving them all of my attention. After watching this I did realize something though.... most of Kent's arguments can be disputed by using his own arguments. Seriously try it out

    • @jemborg
      @jemborg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@capnd.g.4711 come on then, don't leave it like that. Give us an example or two.

    • @capnd.g.4711
      @capnd.g.4711 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jemborg mmmm ok.... but just his MOST common argument. He often uses the Bible to support his arguments so his best argument seems to be "My book says God is real" well I can say "This book says God was a scam made up by the church to get money" both sentences say something that cannot be proven nor disproven. Oh also there's "The Bible says God loves you and is all powerful and all knowing so he must be real" and I can retort with "The Bible says Go's says it's ok to enslave, rape, torture, and burn people alive. It also says there have been times where God didn't know something and couldn't stop something so therefore he must be fake" Both of these arguments are taken from actual things that the Bible actually says and yet they contradict one another.

  • @adam8892
    @adam8892 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Blessings to Lisa the rainbow giraffe. Leaf be upon her.

  • @spyder4201
    @spyder4201 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    This makes Kent MUCH easier to listen to. Thank you for that.

    • @rennnnn914
      @rennnnn914 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's like listening to Ben Shapiro

    • @AB-ku4my
      @AB-ku4my 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I disagree. If Hovind Sr kept his mouth shut he would still be unbearable. Edit: and insane.

  • @RavenFilms
    @RavenFilms 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have to honestly say, that voice mod is an improvement. I know it was probably done just for the lolZ, but it really does make him grate on my nerves less. I never realized how much it detested it until you took it away.

  • @mjjoe76
    @mjjoe76 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The helium voice is good, although the distortion makes it difficult to understand which lie Kent is telling at any given moment.

  • @SongbirdOwl
    @SongbirdOwl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Therapist: "The tuskless elephant isn't real, it can't hurt you."
    The tuskless elephant: 9:24

  • @justanotheropinion5832
    @justanotheropinion5832 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Re wisdom teeth: did Ken just use evolution to prove that evolution doesn’t exist?
    I mean, he absolutely did but is this even real life anymore?

  • @casualsleepingdragon8501
    @casualsleepingdragon8501 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Also kent completely dodged the question as to why we get the crap eyes while squid get the good eyes

    • @diarmuidkuhle8181
      @diarmuidkuhle8181 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ok so we have got a blind spot and technically see things upside down, but our brain does a neat job of editing that out ; and we DO have great visual acuity and pretty damn amazing colour vision.

    • @SuperPatrick777
      @SuperPatrick777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a mindless statement , eyes are designed for their environment squids eyes wouldn't be much use outside of the sea .

    • @beantownbanshees
      @beantownbanshees 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SuperPatrick777 cephalopods have eyes quite similar to us, except their eyes are actually better in the sense that they don’t have a blind spot. The similarity between the eyes are why people compare them.

  • @MiloOfTormentorBand
    @MiloOfTormentorBand 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Kent is my favorite, to laugh at

    • @Jerrid_8675
      @Jerrid_8675 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same

    • @philarmstrong3765
      @philarmstrong3765 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      .'..and for me to poop on!' Triumph, the insult comic dog

    • @raya.p.l5919
      @raya.p.l5919 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ❤All will receive Jesus healing energy all old aches and pains will be washed away. Takes 30 minutes best to relax and shut yr eyes. Also 11 o7 eastren tonight all u will receive level 1 portion of youth longevity digestion an self beauty Jesus energy wash. Negative energy will creep out yr feet tell it's time.

    • @rufus1346
      @rufus1346 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@raya.p.l5919 GOD squad lol. You guys are funny!

    • @philarmstrong3765
      @philarmstrong3765 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@raya.p.l5919 No, thanks.

  • @haroldramislives
    @haroldramislives 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Oh god it aways come back to "you think we came from a rock". Forever ignoring we apparently were made out of clay......*sigh*

  • @CaptainRedBull
    @CaptainRedBull 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    So Kent’s rebuttal is to confirm everything Forrest said in his video? Wtf is wrong with this guy?

    • @Thoron_of_Neto
      @Thoron_of_Neto 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It's like watching that scene with Patrick and the Manta from SpongeBob. Patrick is walked through the entire point, and then at the last second, doesn't agree...
      Comparing Kent to Patrick isn't fair, Patrick is much smarter

    • @lyndafjellman3315
      @lyndafjellman3315 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's how he makes his money. kent won't change till people stop paying him not to.

    • @tyemaddog
      @tyemaddog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pretty clear it's creator vs common ancestry. Both are miracles

    • @MF______
      @MF______ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hm, let me think. What could be wrong with a predatory cult leader...
      Sorry, I don't see anything wrong, do you?

    • @guytheincognito4186
      @guytheincognito4186 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@tyemaddog
      Then you're not using the definition of miracles everyone else is. That's dumb, use the definitions that exist. 🤷‍♂️

  • @najaB76
    @najaB76 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Kent's response to Forrest's point was like someone who's book report on _The Great Gatsby_ starts "The Great Gatsby is a book. It has a blue cover and 250 pages. The title has three words. It was written by F Scott Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald was John F Kennedy's middle name. He was born in 1927 and was the 35th President of the USA..."

  • @DissedRedEngie
    @DissedRedEngie 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    forrest: why did god make humans have wisdom teeth, even though they often cause problems to humans?
    Kent: Did you know, you have teeth? Mindblowing isn't it.

    • @SuperPatrick777
      @SuperPatrick777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That proves devolution not evolutionism .

  • @AnnoyingNewsletters
    @AnnoyingNewsletters 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The voice changer revealed that Kent is just three squirrels in a Hawaiian shirt 🌺🐿️🐿️🐿️🌺

  • @phoenixkingtheo
    @phoenixkingtheo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    if Forrest would chose to debate Kent he would absolutely destroy Kent, but it's not worth it at this point. Kent has been doing the same old thing for decades now and he's never once corrected himself.

  • @chickenpants
    @chickenpants 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Please don't use the arms again. I'm still horrified by my disembodied floating circle suddenly having arms. Well done in letting kent show us who he is, very gentle touch today. Cheers

  • @RockyP77
    @RockyP77 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Big help with the voice change!!

  • @iainaitken4472
    @iainaitken4472 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ask kent what sort of creator made his testicles grow upwards from his neck

  • @helicopterharry5101
    @helicopterharry5101 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As soon as he started talking about eyes I knew Darwin would be brought up.

  • @BoneySkylord
    @BoneySkylord 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dr Kunt, the science runt. Always good for a laugh!

  • @Klinkertinlegs
    @Klinkertinlegs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No wonder he thinks it would take hours to respond to Forrest. He drones on and on about things that are not even tangentially related to the point he’s supposed to be making.

  • @avi8r66
    @avi8r66 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    That comment about Forrest and others liking their echo chambers is hilarious. First, Forrest participates in call in shows where people can call in to argue. Second, he has offered to deate Matt Powell, but powell pussied out. Third, Kent and Powell, and several other apologist channels, have banned people like me from commenting specifically to protect their own echo chambers.

    • @NewNecro
      @NewNecro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I find hilarious that the most damning accusations on "darwinists" are based on their own understanding of concepts of dogma, faith and echo-chambers which they understand as well as they do (unlike any scientific field) because that's what they actively practice.. pure, unfiltered projection.

  • @thancrow
    @thancrow 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    He has been corrected by so many bioligists, But thinks he knows better, or simply ignores the science.

  • @katieheys3007
    @katieheys3007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We all have a little crush on Forrest

  • @jemborg
    @jemborg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Back in the Seventies in my high school, "wack" was a synonym for _wank._ 😂

  • @silverdragon4344
    @silverdragon4344 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The second I heard Kent's "voice" I had to pause the vid and die laughing! 🤣🤣

  • @cennethadameveson3715
    @cennethadameveson3715 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I think you're pronouncing Kent wrong😂

    • @mjjoe76
      @mjjoe76 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      See you next Tuesday!

    • @theperfectidio1
      @theperfectidio1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      i just realised what you're implying 💀

    • @skandragon586
      @skandragon586 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theperfectidio1 oh? im too literal.. i missed it, care to fill us slow people in?

    • @Isaac-hm6ih
      @Isaac-hm6ih 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@skandragon586 There's a piece of genitalia used as an insult in some places which sounds similar to Kent. I assume that's what's being referred to.

    • @skandragon586
      @skandragon586 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Isaac-hm6ih ohhh that makes so much sense i can't believe it didnt cross my mind lol

  • @markbeoluke6454
    @markbeoluke6454 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I seriously think that Kent has a major chip on his shoulders because he hasn't made it anywhere as big as other religious conmen/charletons like Kenneth Copeland.

  • @jeb6314
    @jeb6314 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    An interesting book on the poor design of the human body is Abby Hafer's "The Not-so Intelligent Designer. Of wisdom teeth, years ago I had an upper tooth removed. The lower one grew and grew and GREW ever upward. The pain was agonizing! When the dentist finally removed that lower tooth, he found that it had grown into the bone of the upper jaw and had dislodged small flecks of bone from that jaw. Godfrey really f*ck*d up that job. As Hafer, points out, a god who would design this body would fail an engineering class horribly.

  • @oponentgull186others4
    @oponentgull186others4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    You literally don’t need to defend anyone from Kent hovand. After 2 seconds he goes off on his own and doesn’t even really make a point

    • @guytheincognito4186
      @guytheincognito4186 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes but it's a good excuse to point and laugh and offer some soothing reasoning. 😂

  • @alangarland8571
    @alangarland8571 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Next voice changer could be something like a low frequency grunty troll.😀

    • @TheSkepTick
      @TheSkepTick  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Definitely will try that!

  • @Vyrlokar
    @Vyrlokar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    While it's funny, I would say that this changed voice is even more annoying than the regular Kent Hovind one

  • @tankedwarthog6424
    @tankedwarthog6424 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I didn't know that I needed helium Kent, but now that I have heard him, no thanks, you can have him back

  • @FlyinZX10R
    @FlyinZX10R 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kent forgot to add Tap Dancing to his credentials.

  • @kjs8719
    @kjs8719 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There's a point in the video where ken clears his throat, and it would have been absolutely hilarious if you lifted the filter at that point 😂

  • @fewilcoxYT
    @fewilcoxYT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for making his voice so much less painful.

    • @rennnnn914
      @rennnnn914 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's like listening to Ben Shapiro, lol

  • @Means_Of_Production
    @Means_Of_Production 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Somehow you have managed to make him a modicum less annoying.

  • @GalactusTheDestroyer
    @GalactusTheDestroyer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Oh sweet, a new SkepTick video! You upload I click. May Lisa the Rainbow Giraffe bestows leaves upon you. More Hen.

    • @mrapistevist
      @mrapistevist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Moor hen! Moor hen.

  • @carolinelabbott2451
    @carolinelabbott2451 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Finally, we get to hear the true kent voice, squeaky.
    Love it.😂❤😊

  • @HappyExtheist
    @HappyExtheist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love Kent's new voice; makes him sound like a character on South Park.

  • @DaviniaHill
    @DaviniaHill 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    He says "Dr Kent the Science Gent" and three of those words are lies.

  • @hughiegibson1716
    @hughiegibson1716 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The ONLY thing that Kent has ever said that I agree with, “everyone has a different standard of beauty”

  • @TheMArtagnan
    @TheMArtagnan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “Why do we have wisdom teeth?”
    “10 mins of teeth facts with nothing to do with the question”

    • @glossypots
      @glossypots 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We used to be bigger with wider jaws. We also used to live much longer in Noah’s case 900 years old before he kicked the bucket, but all this came to an end when we started to sin more and more into we got smaller and smaller and so did our life span. Naughty people that we are and I hope that explains everything? 😂😂

  • @neilholmes8200
    @neilholmes8200 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Kent messed up there"
    Me: well imagine my shock

  • @DaremoTen
    @DaremoTen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Kent Hovind has an annoying voice."
    "No worries, I can fix that"
    "It's even more annoying, you made it worse!"
    "Worse... Or Better?"

  • @thetalkingbear
    @thetalkingbear 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Loved it. I think the altered voice fits Kent. Almost like a Chihuahua made human. Bery appropriate.

  • @JustCameronAndHisJeep
    @JustCameronAndHisJeep 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The voice-changer did not help. Idiots still grate on my nerves. Thank you for enduring to product this video. Keep up the great work.

  • @skyinou
    @skyinou 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    "Don't need to" - Thank K. Hoving for agreeing that evolution makes more sense than "god did it!"

  • @TheSteveLynx
    @TheSteveLynx 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Gotta love Kent's research which consists of never reading full articles,
    but just googling and picking from 50.000.000 sources the ones that he can use to say "Aha, gotcha"
    and when that doesnt suffice....
    "Well, maybe if... then god designed it to be that way, I don't have proof, I can't even back it with bibleverses, but god real, end of 'discussion', consider yourself whacked.."

  • @joperhop
    @joperhop 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kent vs Forrest....
    Not only would Forrest utterly destroy him, without mercy! he would do it whilst being one of the friendliest positive and respectful people on this planet! I need this!!
    "Forrest is scared to debate" which is why he does phone in debate shows all the time.....

  • @ToxicMonster5
    @ToxicMonster5 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Someone needs to bring this up to kent since he loves to claim that humans were much larger before the flood, the worlds tallest person was Robert Pershing Wadlow at 8'11" and because of his height he died young at 22 of septic shock, caused by his height, or how about Andre the Giant at 7'4" who suffered from Giantism, who died partially because of his height

  • @ctwentysevenj6531
    @ctwentysevenj6531 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Something went wrong with evolution, well in one instance. Kent came into the world🤣🤣

  • @Vegan_Ape_2018
    @Vegan_Ape_2018 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I love this. On so many levels. 😂

  • @SalisburyKarateClub
    @SalisburyKarateClub 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If god worked for me as a designer, I would sack him as incompetent.

    • @stylesrj
      @stylesrj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Yahweh, why are you running that electrical cable across several tables? The power point is right there, like... you don't need to run all this cable... Look, you've even run a shorter power cable anyway! WHY!?"

  • @stevenalexander7309
    @stevenalexander7309 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Pretty sure what we watched was Kent googling "wisdom teeth" and treating the tube to his reading out of the results, none of which had anything to do with the points Forrest made.

  • @brickwitheyes1710
    @brickwitheyes1710 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He's making it up as he goes along! 😆

  • @Tyrnak_Fenrir
    @Tyrnak_Fenrir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "People were larger in the past, there are outlires, and scientists are trying to fix these issues, therefore god"
    How can anyone take this seriously?

    • @unknown5150variable
      @unknown5150variable 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are a lot of dumb people just roaming around in society. Forget being scared of ghost and the paranormal its BS what scares me most are the idiots that believe in the paranormal and BS like flat earth, angels and biblical Idiocracy.

  • @tinawitte420
    @tinawitte420 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aaaaaaahhhh, the voice changer is to an atheist what a blessing is to a theist.

  • @Mythlorrr
    @Mythlorrr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm only ~7 min in, and I already see Kent freebooting Forrest's video (playing 2/3 of the video with no reaction counts in my book). Right after Legal Eagle released a video on fair use too.

  • @thelyrebird1310
    @thelyrebird1310 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At last kent explains why he has drag marks on his knuckles, its the brow ridges of his Klingon and knuckle dragging ape ancestors

  • @Viktor_Git
    @Viktor_Git 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I can't wait to see how Forrest react to this....... piece.
    It will be hilarious 🤣🤣🤣

  • @xxbongobazookaxx7170
    @xxbongobazookaxx7170 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm watching this a couple days after dental surgery, partial removal of 2nd molar with full removal of at least 1 wisdom tooth likely to be required in a year or so. The massive swelling and annoying stitches in my gum along with the fact I'm taking alternating painkillers every 2 hours just to maintain any concentration are making this whole tooth thing hit different

  • @helicopterharry5101
    @helicopterharry5101 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Kent. Forgot how much I love this skit.

  • @brucedavis1803
    @brucedavis1803 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Also, Forrest is great!

  • @sugoisenpai92
    @sugoisenpai92 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The voice changer makes him way more tolerable to listen to

  • @Kevin_Williamson
    @Kevin_Williamson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If some set of circumstances occurred so that Hovind tried to 'whack" me, I'd treat it the same way I treat any small child who clearly lacks the education and maturity to handle an intelligent discussion and just ignore him. Let him prattle on. I wouldn't dignify his nonsense by watching or responding to it.
    As it is, I would never see or hear him if not for the atheist responses to his gross ignorance and arrogance..

    • @tremas3329
      @tremas3329 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      On the one hand, i can see your point. On the other hand, many MANY people see things by Hovind and other apologists and believe it to be true because theyve never been challenged on their beliefs nor seen anything that contradicts the claims they made. One could only hope that maybe some of those people will find their way to reaction video's like this and begin to question their dogmatic beliefs. For the rest of us, sometimes its fun to watch someone make a fool of themselves trying to twist observable facts to suit their unsubstantiated bull.

    • @Kevin_Williamson
      @Kevin_Williamson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tremas3329 -- all of what you say makes sense. I was simply speaking for myself. Others are free to do as they think best. Or at least most entertaining.
      Hovind is a very old, broken record who hasn't had any new material since the last century. At this point, I'm betting his following is either too dense to understand any well-crafted and factual response or they just adore him too much to go outside their bubble. But, like, that's just my opinion.

  • @eruantien9932
    @eruantien9932 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can't lie, I saw the title and thumbnail, and thought it was Forrest defending someone from Hovind's nonsense again.

  • @dainbramage9508
    @dainbramage9508 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Forrest does debate on the Atheist Experience Channel and they routinely give their callers uninterrupted time to explain and defend their claim. Which is more than what people on Kent's side usually provide, they tend to interrupt as a debate tactic because they can't lose if you can't be heard over them. And if you're debate tactics are either shouting over your opponent, or rapid firing questions at them faster than they can answer because you know any answers given will seriously hurt your position, then you don't have a very strong position to defend and you're well aware of it to

  • @XEndlessSteelX
    @XEndlessSteelX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Forrest must be terrified of debating this man with the mental capacity of a LEGO block.

    • @tressonkaru7410
      @tressonkaru7410 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gasp! That's an insult to Legos! They're way smarter than kent.

    • @markbeoluke6454
      @markbeoluke6454 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think there are neutron stars that are less dense than Kent and his followers!

  • @matthewharrison7127
    @matthewharrison7127 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Leave it to Kent Hovind to run head on into the point and still miss it.

  • @JustKingAteo
    @JustKingAteo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    TheSkepTicks shape is sharper then Kent

  • @JimmyTuxTv
    @JimmyTuxTv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Present and ready to whack and be whacked