Meet the M551 Sheridan tank! Walkaround at NACC Ft. Benning

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2020
  • Follow and support the NACM with the links below!
    Sources for this video include US ARMOR magazine, Jan-Feb 1997 as well as Steven Zaloga's 'M551' the R P Hunnicutt's 'History of the American Light Tank' and Alfed.org
    Check out U.S. Army Armor & Cavalry Collection: / armorcollection
    / armorandcavalrycollection
    Keep up with me and the latest in World of Tanks and the world of tanks! / sofigaming
    / sofigaming
    / the_sofilein
    Proudly sponsored by Corsair go.corsair.com/kMNXM

ความคิดเห็น • 208

  • @tsmgguy
    @tsmgguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I led a platoon in alpha troop, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, 1975-76. One of my M551's had the armor shown around the TC's hatch. It was also the first in the regiment to have a laser rangefinder installed, which worked very well. Accurate ranging was the key to accuracy with the 152mm gun. Usually, we didn't have training 152mm ammo, so we fired the black HEAT rounds. These played hell with targets downrange. Unfortunately, if you fired the 152mm gun, the recoil was so stiff that the front roadwheels would lift off of the ground, and the Shillelagh ATGM system would be out until it could be repaired and recalibrated. We had so little money and training ammo that usually only one practice Shillelagh round was allocated per troop, per year. We fired it from whichever track had an operational system. One of my M551s had bullet holes in it from Viet Nam, as does the vehicle in the video, at 2:58. We got a wild hare to swim the M551s at a local lake, only to find that the neoprene swimming "curtains" on each vehicle were no good. They cracked and broke when we tried to rig them.

    • @Noahsaltys
      @Noahsaltys 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How does the driver hatch open for the Sheridan I'm kinda confused

    • @tsmgguy
      @tsmgguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Noahsaltys It's semi-circular, and is suspended from the hull from its top, on bearings, looking a bit like half of a bell. In the video, the hatch is closed. When fully open, the hatch is behind the driver's head and forward visibility is completely unobstructed. Google M551 driver's hatch for photos.

    • @Noahsaltys
      @Noahsaltys 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tsmgguy oh OK thanks!

  • @GregW1955
    @GregW1955 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Thanks for the walk around of the Sheridan. I spent 3 1/2 years in a M551 with the 2nd Armored Cavalry 1973-77 patrolling the border of West Germany and Czechoslovakia. The 152mm gun was powerful, but was slow to load and had a lot of misfires, the canon round was caseless and if you weren't careful you could break it open and spill propellent all over the turret floor. I could hit anything I could see with the missile but you had to sit with the red dot on the target which to me seemed like a really long time. It was fun to drive and maint. was easy, we could change an engine in a little over 30 minutes. I was never confidant the Sheridan would perform well against the Russians.

    • @jackdemuynck6564
      @jackdemuynck6564 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This comment is right on. Another interesting fact was the front #1 roadwheel would jump up to a foot or more when firing the 152mm. Where you at Coleman Barracks. If so I was across the street in the 3-35 1st AD. Thanks

    • @troll4445
      @troll4445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We were told are mission was to slow down a Wasaw attack for approximately 30 seconds!!!
      3/11 ACR

    • @troll4445
      @troll4445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Warsaw...

    • @martiniv8924
      @martiniv8924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Greg Williams really interesting insight into an unusual fighting vehicle, and I’m guessing with all due respect to you and the other crews, the big Soviet T series would have blitzed the lightly armored Sheridan , my brother served in the late 50’s in Germany during the Cold War in an infantry division, (Royal northumberland fusiliers) if WW3 had of kicked off, he didn’t rate anyone’s survival along that border much more than a day or two.

    • @robertk4920
      @robertk4920 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Greg Williams: Sounds like 2nd ACR Amberg or Bindlach?

  • @loganinkosovo
    @loganinkosovo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    When firing the main gun on a Sheridan from a stop the tank basically reared back on it's suspension. The Track and the first couple of road wheels came off the ground. You were advised never to fire the main gun over the side of the tank because it has a tendency to flip the tank over on it's other side. It was fun to drive but you got beat up a bit operating it. Back then everything used Cherry Juice (OHT) Hydraulic Fluid. This stuff was very flammable. The 4.2 inch Mortar guys used to dump it down their barrels for photographing night shoots. One of the main Hydraulic Lines ran under the Sheridan's Turret Basket. After years of wear and dry rot these lines would leak. All it took was a spark or a careless smoker to set the tank on fire. I’ve watched an entire tank crew bail out of a moving Sheridan as it was going down the tank trail on fire. The Sheridans were used by both OPFOR (Opposing Forces) and the OC (Observer/Controllers) at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, California. The crews weren’t trained as Tankers and some of them struggled to cope with aged equipment and unfamiliar tasks. I started out my Career as a 17 year old Tanker back in the late 70’s so I would stop and show the kids driving the Sheridans how to change track or what ever they were doing wrong. This aged equipment caused some causalities also. WE used them for the OC on the Livefire Range. They were supposed to make the job safer than jeeps and Humvees but just about everything in the inventory could either penetrate to the crew compartment or go right through the vehicle. We lost some people to friendly fire incidents. When we let National Guard Units onto the Range in preparation for Desert Storm it became rather dicey. One of the friendly fire incidents turned out better than it could have when I was there. The Forward Scouts were falling back on the defense battle position after spotting the enemy targets. One of their Bradleys conked out so the OC placed the crew inside his Sheridan and radioed us to put a no kill box around the vehicle. The Player Unit Scout Platoon Leader did not stop to see if his people were ok and what was going to happen to the down vehicle. He just kept going and when he reached the Battle Position he radioed that he was clear of the firing line and they could commence firing. We had not given the unit the orders allowing them to fire any weapon yet but the two M-1 Abrams tanks near where the Scout Platoon returned to the Battle Position opened Fire. One practice SABOT round dug a groove across the turret in front of the Tank Commander's hatch and the other shot off the radio antenna. It took us a while to get the situation locked down and the OC had some choice words for the National Guard but no one was hurt. After all was said and done I looked at my commander, who had just about lost his mind straightening everything out. I figured he needed some cheering up. I told him that if we were in the British Army those crews would be punished twice.” He knew I had a weird sense of humor but he just had to ask me why twice? I replied “Once for firing without orders.” I waited a few seconds and then gave him the gimlet eye and said “ A second time for damned bad marksmanship!”

  • @chuckfinley6156
    @chuckfinley6156 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    was a 19E of the OPFOR at the NTC in 84-86. drove the VISMOD M-551 all over Ft. Irwin. it hauled ass and was easy to work on. Steel on Steel.

  • @aceroadholder2185
    @aceroadholder2185 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The first Sheridan I saw in Vietnam had run over a command detonated mine. It looked like the Jolly Green Giant had taken a can opener, split the Sheridan's belly open and turned the vehicle wrong side out. It didn't inspire much confidence.

  • @SGood54
    @SGood54 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was a Tank Commander on a Sheridan. F Troop, 2d Squadron, 2d Armored Cavalry Regiment - Bamberg, Germany.
    As a Gunner, I fired over 230 Main Gun Rounds, and 2 Shillelagh Missles.

  • @ggggg6843
    @ggggg6843 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Sheridan is hard to forget, I had great feelings for him , world of tanks forever !

    • @Garviel_
      @Garviel_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      world of tanks is wank

    • @eze417
      @eze417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The crews that served on them liked them. Armor and firepower were lacking, but mobility was very good.

    • @ggggg6843
      @ggggg6843 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eze417 That's for sure .

    • @ph5832
      @ph5832 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Airborne!!!!

  • @jeffreym.keilen1095
    @jeffreym.keilen1095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was on these at Ft.Irwin,Ca ( aka "The Planet") from 1984 to 1988. They were VisMod to represent T-72 and other Soviet tracked vehicles. My unit, 1/73 Armor was a part of the OPFOR training unit. These were stripped down of most of the firing systems and other non-essential items. They were light,fast and fun to drive.

  • @1337flite
    @1337flite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    These were considered for Australian service in the 60s - I've read the Manual For Land Warfare (MLW - the Aussie version of a Field Manual) that includes TOE and planning tables for the M551. Glad we stuck with the Centurion.
    That said as a kid this was my favourite tank on account of the fact I had a diecast Matchbox model of one.

    • @frequentfiler
      @frequentfiler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So did I! Ended up crewing an M1 though

    • @troll4445
      @troll4445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Despite its flaws I had Tons of fun crewing on the M551. It drove like a dream! I drove one for 18 hours straight on a field exercise. Luckily, I did not have to serve in combat in this vehicle. RPGs and landmines tore them up!

    • @becauseiwasinverted5222
      @becauseiwasinverted5222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard about this too. Frankly I found it odd that they rejected it in favor of an upgunned M113.

  • @randomcoyote8807
    @randomcoyote8807 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks Sofilein; the Sheridan was the first tank I got to see the inside of and sit in when I was a kid (our National Guard had some on display at a county fair) so for many years, this was what came to mind as "a tank". I wish we could re-design something like it today, with more modern tech and such for today's airborne forces.

  • @johnberryhill8106
    @johnberryhill8106 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had great memories of my Sheridan in the 11th Armored Cav in Fulda W. Germany in the 70's.
    My Track was always up and running. The only thing I would complain about was when firing the 152mm was my gunners optics would fall in his lap after firing......lol

  • @ryanfirst9761
    @ryanfirst9761 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I served as an infantryman in the 82nd, and it was our armor then. I remember riding on top of several during my time in the field at Bragg. Thank you.

  • @abntemplar82
    @abntemplar82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    i spent my first enlistment in the 82nd. got to work with 3/73 (I think that was the tank bn back then) once or twice on ranges. i wasn't a tanker but the 551 was the only tank I ever got to ride in during my 20 + years in. dam when those things fire it is a s^&* storm inside. thanks for the trip down memory lane Sofi great vid.

    • @Megabyteme325
      @Megabyteme325 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      82nd Airborne crews weren't tankers they were 19D if I remember correctly. They also ran .45 cal grease guns because m16 wouldn't fit in the tank. I remember quite a few ranges they were our support element and also scraping them off of Sicily DZ.

    • @abntemplar82
      @abntemplar82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Megabyteme325 as I recall the guys from the 3/73rd would disagree with you on that.
      as for the grease gun, yes they did. great little weapon to shoot. ah yes the advantages of being a medic. I got to play with all the toys under the tree.

    • @Megabyteme325
      @Megabyteme325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@abntemplar82 I was a grunt so usually big metal things were bullet magnets but they were fun to watch. Especially when they would fire the gun and the first 2 sets of road wheels would be off the ground.

    • @abntemplar82
      @abntemplar82 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Megabyteme325 grunts, my best customers, love em. yea I was a grunt medic most of my career. to include most of my two terms in the 82nd. loved that job.
      but yea, watching tanks unload is awesome. but I agree they were bullet magnets. in the 82nd I swear half the training was aimed at taking out tanks and ifvs.

    • @abntemplar82
      @abntemplar82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Megabyteme325 couldn't agree more about Polk. I never made it to Chaffee. Polk was bad enough, the only other place I can say I hated as much was my basic training post at Leonard Wood.

  • @sheridanfalkenberry5611
    @sheridanfalkenberry5611 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey it's good to see my namesake getting some love!

  • @lonniedotson7558
    @lonniedotson7558 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    man brings back memories...lived on one for a year in Nam

    • @cambodianexpress8557
      @cambodianexpress8557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome home brother... I drove and commanded ACAV's 69-70 Vietnam and Cambodia. Got to drive the Sheridan a couple of times and spent hours beside them in firefights. She wasn't lying about the effectiveness of the fleshett round, (Spelling ?), was she.

  • @TescoVee
    @TescoVee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent work as always!!
    Keep 'em coming!!

  • @troll4445
    @troll4445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @Mike Cooper Turret was cramped. Gunner seat especially. TC and loader better. Driver compartment was great! Could fold the driver seat back and lie down sideways and sleep like a baby! Driver had an escape hatch below and of course his swiveling driver hatch in front. Driver visibility buttoned up was pretty good too! Hull armor zero, turret armor not much either.

  • @bumblebeebob
    @bumblebeebob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love this new first with a brief history! So much more interesting than the previous walk arounds. Thank you do much.

    • @bumblebeebob
      @bumblebeebob 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dog gone autocorrect! Format, damnit! Format not first. Lol

  • @Robert-hr6sh
    @Robert-hr6sh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When the 551 fired conventional rounds it's front area off the ground for recoil was 4 inches. One hell of a blast of 152 mm round which was close to a 4 inch navel gun in diameter. And if you could see the target, you could hit it.
    3rd Squadron, 12th Cavalry. Troop A Germany. 1975-1978.

    • @terryfowler6090
      @terryfowler6090 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Make that a 6 inch gun.

  • @pgsahlman
    @pgsahlman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Miss Sofilein - you're the most entertaining tank expert I've seen. I love your videos. Keep up the excellent work and content!!!

  • @keithjennings6187
    @keithjennings6187 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can tell Sofi really loves this stuff. A few times during the video she's close to giggling with joy.

  • @AndrewSkerritt
    @AndrewSkerritt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video! Nice work Fraulien!

  • @kevinbarry7547
    @kevinbarry7547 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sofi - keep up the good work. Anyone can do the common hardware like Tigers, Shermans, T-34, etc. But I enjoy hearing about the one-offs, prototypes and the outliers of armor history like the Sheridan.

  • @AndrewArndts
    @AndrewArndts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In my tenure at Rock Island Arsenal, the 551 was a fun beast to drive. the best automotive comparison would be similar to say a Mazda Miata.

  • @dondacosta6712
    @dondacosta6712 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was with the 82nd airborne during the Panama invasion. And we had a Sheridan tank attached to our unit. He never fired his main gun, just the 50 cal. but dammit when we were under fire that was good enough for me !!

    • @dondacosta6712
      @dondacosta6712 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phred.phlintstone alpha company 3rd battalion 505th , M60AG in weapons squad.

    • @dondacosta6712
      @dondacosta6712 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@phred.phlintstone Negative, I was on fort Bragg doing some kind of assault training at the time of the alert. I had only been in my unit for 1 month after I got out of airborne School. So you can imagine what a shock it was to me and the other cherries. We got put into a holding area under guard after we got our packing list together. And a lot of us still were not sure the jump was going to happen until we got sent to another area on Bragg, and they started handing out live ammo including AT4s.

  • @hybridssuck
    @hybridssuck 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally! More info out there on this oddity! Thank you for spending some time on this. I know a guy that got to see some time in one. He said if you looked underneath you could see the foam that what was used to help it float. Powered by a 6v-71 Detroit diesel I believe.

  • @terryfowler6090
    @terryfowler6090 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was an artillery forward observer with F-Troop 17th Cav Americal 71-72. The crews on the sheridans despised those things. They considered them to be death traps.

  • @DavidDragonhammer
    @DavidDragonhammer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I find you fascinating,the knowledge is good,you make learning fun.

  • @JesusJimenez-be5kn
    @JesusJimenez-be5kn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool Sheridan! thanks for sharing.

  • @mikecooper8462
    @mikecooper8462 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sofi - what is the Sheri's crew comfort and thiccness rating?
    Great video, keep up the excellent work.

  • @frequentfiler
    @frequentfiler 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Toured one of these at NTC when I did a rotation. The turret armor was paper thin compared to my M1. The breech for the main gun was MASSIVE compared to the M68E1 of my tank. A buddy of mine was on these with the 11th ACR and loved them. They moved like a sports car, and the stryofoam armor could actually stop an RPG he said. That accidental discovery led to Chobham armor is the rumor. Love these historical tidbits of armor. Keep up the work!

  • @toben42
    @toben42 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Drove one for 2 years at Ft. Irwin (NTC). Used to heat up our MREs on the exhaust. 👨‍🍳

  • @martinjrgensen8234
    @martinjrgensen8234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is a super video! Would love to see more of the same.
    I feel like we need a Sofi rating for tanks.

    • @mwnciboo
      @mwnciboo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't it a fire support tank?

  • @bat2293
    @bat2293 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dug it! Liked and subscribed.

  • @jarosawjaros7051
    @jarosawjaros7051 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    love your videos u are truly passionate about tanks :) I hope u will have more time for it

  • @iaincollins5743
    @iaincollins5743 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great value for money there on the shilleleagh... aluminium always seemed like an obvious fail as armour, too. But a great vehicle to drive by the accounts I've heard. Thanks for posting, Sofilein. Always nice to hear those dulcet tones

    • @commando552
      @commando552 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I'm on board with the aluminium armour for what they were trying to do. It is proof against machine gun and small arms fire, and if you wanted to go a step above that the armour would have to be so much heavier that the vehicle would no longer be able to do its intended job. Other US vehicles that needed low weight and good mobility like the M113 and Bradley also use aluminium armour. A similar concept is the British CVR(T) family. They are lightweight and portable which in some instances is the only thing that matters regardless of the armour level. For example in the Falklands these were the only vehicle that could actually navigate across the marshes due to their very low ground pressure. Protection wise a CVR(T) is similar to a Sheridan in that it will only stop machine gun rounds, but that is the trade-off for the transportability, small size and mobility you get.
      Normally if they are engaging a tank they have fucked up, although this did happen a fair bit during the 2nd Gulf war. Scimitars knocked out a number of T-55s and T-62s with APDS 30mm but mostly go away with it due to playing it smart and using their mobility and knowing when to call in support. A strange unintended benefit of the thin aluminium armour, supposedly a Scimitar was hit by a 100mm shell from a T-55 and the crew all survived as the shell passed straight through without meeting enough resistance to detonate.

    • @iaincollins5743
      @iaincollins5743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@commando552 thanks for your clarification. I was really just keeping it short, and I'm quite aware of the difference in roles from mbt and tracked reconnaissance vehicles. I bow to your obvious experience regarding the operational details, you certainly illustrate the courage and cool required of the crews in a modern recce unit.

  • @rontroy3843
    @rontroy3843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is one at the American Armor Museum on Long Island. I got to ride one summer of 1976 at Fort Bragg and see one air dropped.

  • @georgestemple3310
    @georgestemple3310 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  • @jamesburt3272
    @jamesburt3272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @davidthomspson9771
    @davidthomspson9771 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now that's an odd tank.Disturbing yet strangely compelling...So cool to see pics and read service history in Vietnam.Thanks Sofilien

  • @robertcolbourne386
    @robertcolbourne386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this Lady , she does a great job !

  • @marksolarz3756
    @marksolarz3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved this tank! If you remember the sturmtiger a rocket firing behemoth that shot a huge 300mm rocket. This was kinda on there minds....when developing a light support tank. It didn’t work out. But the guided missle was hoped to be a bunker buster. The whole thing was to light. But it was a lot of ideas put into one tank. They didn’t use the missle...but that big 152mm was a good brush buster..and the short barrel made it good in tight spots.

    • @marksolarz3756
      @marksolarz3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don Mansfield told me they had a distinctive sound. Big BOOM! Vietnam vet. Light enough to go other places the gamma goat could go! He liked that much maligned vehicle too.

  • @markusbarak8330
    @markusbarak8330 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 152mm gun launcher is my fav weapon system we have ever fielded. The MBT70 and the M60A2E3 is and will always be my favorite tank designs ever!!! There is a reason why the M60 was called the Starship!!!!! Seems to me the amount of love you put into the videos on them you agree!!! I really wish there was more done with the design. MBT70 is still my fav would enjoy tank talking with you some time I do a lot of reading into them. Great vids!

  • @beeamerica5024
    @beeamerica5024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you this is the one I wanted to see I think the first Cav had them in Vietnam

  • @kasha1702
    @kasha1702 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love
    Sofilein

  • @joshuaworman4022
    @joshuaworman4022 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    love the commentary.

  • @waltsears
    @waltsears 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice light tank/reconnaissance vehicle history...fully accurate as far as I can tell. It would be nice to get an update on US efforts to field a replacement for the M2 Bradley IFV. Thanks for your work!

  • @user-lj4bb7rz5q
    @user-lj4bb7rz5q 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope it, is coming in this month in WotB. but this disign is a little more updated, Excellent channel.

  • @TH-rj4ds
    @TH-rj4ds 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    NTC used these with chopped off barrels and fiberglass kits, they called them Vismods, and OPFOR used them as Russian stand ins. Before the 11ACR moved there in the later half of the 90s, they used infantry to man most of these vehicles; being a 6'3 grunt and then stuck in one of these as a gunner sucked as much as it was neat. I was lucky enough to be in one that had all its turret screens.

  • @shadowraith1
    @shadowraith1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting story. Thanks.

    • @ggggg6843
      @ggggg6843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ну да .

  • @josephbaca1899
    @josephbaca1899 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty snazzy... it was my favorite as a boy. I had a diecast toy m-551. I guess I always wanted it to be an actual success.

  • @McNubbys
    @McNubbys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 551 was my favorite tank in Battlefield Vietnam😊

  • @buccaneerrailfanning1776
    @buccaneerrailfanning1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When will Benning put these vehicles on display? Haven't seen them when I went there recently

  • @greghudzik3770
    @greghudzik3770 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Enjoy your vids. You have good, clear voice. I listen on ear buds and, unfortunately, I have to crank the volume way up to hear you. Keep up the good work and add more volume. Thanks.

  • @peternijenhhuis9073
    @peternijenhhuis9073 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍 Thank you 😉

  • @dankingjr.2088
    @dankingjr.2088 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Drove Sheridans in the Army. Fond memories, but a marginal track. SLOW loading! Thanks for the flashback.

  • @scotsbillhicks
    @scotsbillhicks 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once again, thank you for the video. What’s left on my wish list? Well while playing Challenger I always enjoyed the 9th Hi-tech list. This reflected the shenanigans the U.S. army was going through at the time. It looks very much like a 40K orc army with lots of preposterous vehicles depending on high numbers.
    FAVs, with TOW, or auto grenade launchers, RDF light tanks with a 75mm auto-cannon, all sorts of Hummer variants, including ones armed with Hellfire. I think eventually Div 86 prevailed with most units getting Abrams and Bradleys.

  • @dangertgm2529
    @dangertgm2529 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old dude I know was a crewman on one. From the stories he's told me, he really liked the tank. Not sure how much actual combat he saw however so that could be a large factor.

  • @youshihunter
    @youshihunter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I first saw one of these at Fort Lee's Ordnance Education Center

  • @hopcat500
    @hopcat500 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Greg, I was a Medic, HHT, 2/2 ACR, 1976-78 in Bamberg and border camp at Coburg.
    We probably crossed paths!
    Toujours Pret!

    • @loganinkosovo
      @loganinkosovo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      CSC 3/35 AR across the street 1978-80. Vincere Vel Mori! Conquer or Die! :)

  • @tjw4947
    @tjw4947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoyed hearing "you" chat about the M551. Now how to get you in front of the camera instead of behind it... Hmmm. Well done video, Keep up the good work!

  • @imagines9688
    @imagines9688 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    huh cool the sheridan skin i have to replace the fugly one in game is spot on this one!

  • @TH-rj4ds
    @TH-rj4ds 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was gunner on a vismod one at NTC; as a grunt.

  • @SonsOfLorgar
    @SonsOfLorgar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's so cute!

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also one of the first tanks I built as an airfix plastic model :)

  • @Zajuts149
    @Zajuts149 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please say you have a video on the ACAV!

  • @davidjames1068
    @davidjames1068 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    'Sold in Zerg like numbers' ... classic quote.

  • @bobybarra3096
    @bobybarra3096 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gunner "Heat", T72, 800 meters, Identified, "UP", ON THE WAY, 3ACR, C-TRP, DONNA ANNA RANGE,OPERATION BRIGHT STAR, 73.
    THANK YOU AMERICANS ❤

  • @kiwicory100
    @kiwicory100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved it thanks...ps can you do a Type 59 since it's such an iconic tank in WOT?

  • @michaelshea5622
    @michaelshea5622 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was in a Combat Support Company in the early 70s in Germany driving an M-113 with the TOW. But, I always admired the Sheridan. Was a cool looking vehicle. An M-60 was a dime a dozen, but the M-551 was great. Our Recon Platoon had the junk M-114. I always thought this was better.

  • @delta3two
    @delta3two 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Army NEVER considered the Sheridan to be a "tank". The cadre at the Armor School, Fort Know pounded into our heads the track was NOT a tank. Rather, it was a reconnaissance vehicle....officially an Armored Reconnaissance/Airborne Assault Vehicle, M551/M551a1. It was not a tank.

  • @iowadragoncountryoutlaw.2429
    @iowadragoncountryoutlaw.2429 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who's doing the commentary and what have you done to our Sofilein. Very very well done Lady.

  • @ggggg6843
    @ggggg6843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sheridan was a pretty formidable guy.

  • @jwrappuhn71
    @jwrappuhn71 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good vid girl.

  • @cobra5087
    @cobra5087 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Sofilein for a great video. Happy New Year! Have you ever been to the Ontario Tank Museum?

    • @Sofilein
      @Sofilein  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love Ontario Regiment Museum! Went for Aquino last year and will try my very best to attend again this year. Love their collection and their team ❤️

  • @justsomedude7583
    @justsomedude7583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Waaaaaait....Cadillac made this tank? Or just the prototype or engine? Not entirely sure on their role here. AND DAMN the recoil thing, had no idea. Any unfortunate gunners actually lose an eye from it? Good video, watched others on the Sheridan and this had much more info!

  • @brettmccafferty7510
    @brettmccafferty7510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A peak inside and some actual footage of it in action would help your videos.

  • @jimhenry1262
    @jimhenry1262 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The Army always wants tanks that can fly and float.
    That always means the poor guys stuck in these things get killed because of thin armor and no mine protection. As happened in Vietnam.
    Armored fighting vehicles would improve drastically if the clueless designers of the M113 , the Ontos , and the Bradly and the Sheridan were the first one's sent to combat zones.
    Instead what happens is kids get killed in them , most often from mines in the case of Vietnam and then reports come back to the planners of these vehicles and then they start to add better protection.
    What idiot thought that 50 mm of aluminum so called armor would great of an A PC like the M113 and also the Bradley?

  • @samanli-tw3id
    @samanli-tw3id 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, hi Warpath!

  • @andrewdavies877
    @andrewdavies877 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "Based on calibre" Does that mean the Sheridan is a heavy tank ?

    • @canteenfb
      @canteenfb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same thing 🤣

    • @LuvLikeTruck
      @LuvLikeTruck 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And if it's a "heavy", is it thicc enough for Sofi?

    • @canteenfb
      @canteenfb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LuvLikeTruck it surely is thicc enough for me I mean just look at the chubby boi 😳

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@canteenfb short and chubby

    • @garyK.45ACP
      @garyK.45ACP 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Technically, not even a tank. It was classified as an "Armored Fighting Vehicle", just as is the Bradley.

  • @noobepro_7146
    @noobepro_7146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M103 next

  • @arhangeo
    @arhangeo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks much better than the one in game.
    I know a mod exists

  • @Hamzat22
    @Hamzat22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the most WH40K tank i ever saw. Praise the Emperor!

  • @GregAtlas
    @GregAtlas 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never felt it was as bad as people say in the role it was designed for. It just needed more time in the development oven but it had to be rushed for the war. Later models fixed the majority of the issues except for the Shillelagh.

  • @Bowhunter-ky3ez
    @Bowhunter-ky3ez 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have not seen a video on the Bradly

  • @leo_leo6345
    @leo_leo6345 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And you can find it as Targetpracticeobject in fragments 😎👍

  • @ianmortimer5325
    @ianmortimer5325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M26 Pershing!!

  • @josephbaca9681
    @josephbaca9681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...good info. I never knew it was such a waste of a tank. That gun launcher seemed like it would be awesome.

  • @donaldelliott4045
    @donaldelliott4045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1/6 Armored Cav, Ft Hood. 152mm gun total failure, case tended to crack, lifted front end off the ground &destroyed the missile guidance system. Fast, easy to maintain, no armor protection.

    • @mwnciboo
      @mwnciboo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got to love running around Bare-back - It is fun until your lack of protection and your antics catch up with you.

    • @delta3two
      @delta3two 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Donald, I NEVER observed a Sheridan being "....lifted front end off the ground...." by the recoil of a 152mm round ! The platform was very stable and your recollection being "....lifted off the ground...." may be an early sign of dementia !

    • @donaldelliott4045
      @donaldelliott4045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I ran 3 different gunnery ranges with the M551. Believe me, standing on the back deck, you have an excellent view of the tanks next to you. If it was so great, why did they dump the 152 gun on the Starship and then the Whole M551 program?

  • @Steven-kp4wk
    @Steven-kp4wk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    11th acr babeeeee

  • @TheEdmond30
    @TheEdmond30 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Centurion always gets my vote... and Challenger 2 nearly set my trousers alight... Find us experimentals weirder the better. ARVs are always cool..

  • @yoda5565
    @yoda5565 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw one air dropped at Fort Bragg in 1979/80. It made a better bomb, than tank. Major report of survey.

  • @ekiadif6893
    @ekiadif6893 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Next tank
    Bob semple tank

  • @Absaalookemensch
    @Absaalookemensch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Abrams is air transportable and, with only slightly higher mishap rates than the M551, is also air dropable.

    • @erwin669
      @erwin669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Abrams can only be transported in C-5 and C-17, while the Sheridan could be transported in any of the cargo aircraft the Air Force had. The Abrams is too heavy to be air dropped. The Sheridan was the only tank that could be airdropped.

  • @ninadesilov1415
    @ninadesilov1415 ปีที่แล้ว

    I lov u

  • @qarapaimqazaq7746
    @qarapaimqazaq7746 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    😍😍😍уменя есть в ангаре шеридан ..любимая лт

  • @thedungeondelver
    @thedungeondelver 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting point, the Shillelagh missile had (on paper at least) the same or very similar performance to the TOW-A (400mm armor penetration, 350 m/sec flight speed). It *should have been* as good as the TOW and if it'd been used in a similar fashion (stand-alone launcher that didn't also fire a 152mm round that screwed up the fire control system), I'm sure it'd have been an effective weapon.

  • @gusgone4527
    @gusgone4527 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Sheridan "tank" recon vehicle looks the part but sadly never lived up to the hype. When up against rivals such as the Scimitar and Scorpion fielded by the UK, it was always going to loose out.

  • @kevinpride6543
    @kevinpride6543 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want 1. Without the missile cannon. Hell, without the turret.

  • @Irish37
    @Irish37 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed the video, but I would have clicked 'Like' just for "...if you dug it!" - Bob.

  • @sirgraveson4568
    @sirgraveson4568 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this tank looks like something the imperial guard from warhammer40k would use