#45 Using The Memorial To Witness To Jehovah's Witnesses. Quick Questions For Jehovah's Witnesses

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
  • ตลก

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @emblems4life726
    @emblems4life726 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Miss your videos, and we are so glad you made this one with such profound logic. Blessings Brother!

  • @nikiawatts1277
    @nikiawatts1277 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for your video!! Your questions are so helpful!!! Please post more.

  • @ekklesiaministeriomundiale6524
    @ekklesiaministeriomundiale6524 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome. A must share. Be blessed from Virginia and an exjw myself.

  • @michaelashworth4391
    @michaelashworth4391 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good Question! Very Good Question! Hopefully some JWs know the difference between Watchtower Tradition and Biblical Truth! Most JWs know that the Apostles & Disciples where Not Baptised in Holy Spirit until 50 after Passover at Pentecost. They also Know & Believe that Jesus returned in 1914 so that for Many the Memorial is Past & Gone. Therefore they can give it up for Family Worship Night like it was over 3,500 years ago at the time of Exodus! Letting the head of the household determine

  • @rpbandz3533
    @rpbandz3533 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video man, thanks

  • @vinoo1946
    @vinoo1946 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent reasoning and logic...Irrefutable........I think I'll use this on unsuspecting door-knockers...

  • @HomeroSignorini
    @HomeroSignorini 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have the letter of Jude as our example in the Holy Bible, especially in verses 8-10, that we can never use the words of judgment, because we are not one of the judges. Jehovah, the Supreme Judge, rebukes the wicked!

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Homero Signorini Did you just call me wicked? That's a pretty judgmental thing to say. ;-)

    • @HomeroSignorini
      @HomeroSignorini 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +EvidenceMinistries ...I do nothing know about your personally, so I can not call you wicked. The Wicked One is a designation for Satan the Devil, who stands in opposition to the Supreme God, Jehovah, and His righteous standards.- Matthew 6:13 & 1 John 5:19.

  • @michaelashworth4391
    @michaelashworth4391 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...when to celebrate Family Communion, weekly, monthly or yearly. !!!!

  • @aaronparsons7826
    @aaronparsons7826 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's actually an easy one to answer. I am not a JW, but this is easily reconciled when one considers that after the 1000 years Jesus will hand over all power and authority to the Father.
    So simple...

    • @bowrudder899
      @bowrudder899 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is it just me, or does your post not address the dilemma at all? Jesus said the thief would be WITH HIM (= Jesus) in paradise the same day. But the WTBTS teaches that Jesus will be in heaven, and the thief will be on earth. So in what sense -- given WTBTS teaching -- will the thief be WITH JESUS? I don't see how your post addresses that.

    • @aaronparsons7826
      @aaronparsons7826 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      bowrudder lol was Jesus in paradise that day though? Jesus apparently was not in paradise at all. He even said he hasn’t yet ascended to paradise. Some traditions say Jesus was in hell. In any event, JW’s are correct about this. Just like Elijah and Moses appearing in a vision was just a vision. Not them in heaven. Jesus said no man has ascended to the Father.

    • @bowrudder899
      @bowrudder899 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aaron
      I am very surprised to hear you don't believe Jesus. Of course he was in paradise the same day. You think he was a liar? I am very surprised to hear you say that. And where in the Bible say he had not "ascended to paradise"? I believe those were your words.

    • @bowrudder899
      @bowrudder899 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aaron
      Do you believe the thief on the cross will be WITH HIM (with Jesus) as Jesus said?

    • @aaronparsons7826
      @aaronparsons7826 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      bowrudder wow you’re a special kind of stupid lol Ascension is going up. Jesus says it after being resurrected and appearing to the disciples.
      There’s no comma in the Greek so it’s the translators choice of where to put it. I don’t make Jesus a liar. You’re just an idiot.

  • @michaeljfelkerapologetics
    @michaeljfelkerapologetics 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just did a quick search to see what the Watchtower response to this is. Do they sidestep the issue or what! "How, then, would Jesus be with the evildoer? By raising him from the dead, making provision for his physical needs, and extending to him the opportunity to learn and conform to Jehovah’s requirements for eternal life. (John 5:28, 29) Jesus saw in the evildoer’s repentant and respectful attitude a basis for including him among the billions who will be resurrected to earthly life and the opportunity to prove their worthiness to live forever in Paradise." (rs p. 284-288)

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +michaeljfelker Here is the problem though. The Watchtower doesn't really answer the question. It isn't, how will Jesus be with the evildoer? It is, how will the evildoer be with Jesus?

    • @michaeljfelkerapologetics
      @michaeljfelkerapologetics 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just to play a little devil's advocate here, they'd probably say the evildoer will be "with" him in the sense of being under his rule in the earthly kingdom.

  • @lulubellers
    @lulubellers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    They (the governing body) also assume that that promis didn't come true.

  • @sallypeterson3171
    @sallypeterson3171 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They imagine that by *Disobeying* Jesus they might have eternal life? Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. John 6:53 Refuse to partake=refusing to accept Jesus sacrifice for our sins=no eternal life=no paradise earth. Simple

    • @Sirach144
      @Sirach144 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're just as bad as the JWs. I've talked to you before. You're just like them.

    • @c_rhynehardt
      @c_rhynehardt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep, the memorial ceremony is a Jesus Christ rejection party. They only focus on Christ's death; not his resurrection. They celebrate his death but won't celebrate his birth. This is a satanic organization!

  • @ianthurlby2788
    @ianthurlby2788 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hmmm but does the bible say where there are two of his brothers are together, he also will be in there mist so jesus can be with the evil doel in the new order or on the paradise earth where he will be walking among the survivals...

  • @Nighthawkinlight
    @Nighthawkinlight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this ministry still active? It looks like this channel and associated website have not been updated in a long time.

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, we are still active. You are correct in that our website and blog needs a complete overhaul. I plan on having a new video up in a couple of weeks. Stay Tubed!

    • @Nighthawkinlight
      @Nighthawkinlight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EvidenceMinistries Great, thanks. Is there a way I can donate apart from the website?

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nighthawkinlight A check sent to our PO box is the way most people do it. If you have any other questions, email me through our site.

  • @smmn1316
    @smmn1316 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m Not A Jehovah’s Witness, But I Would Think That They Could Fairly Easily Resolve What You’ve Presented As A “Problem With Their Theology” With A Few Simple Scriptures Regarding The Matter.
    My Guess Is That They Would Simply Refer You To Jesus Promise To His Disciples Before His Ascension To Heaven: “I Am With You Each And Every Day Until The End Of The Age” - Matthew 28:20 (ISV)
    Then They Might Add: “Jesus Made This “Promise” To His Followers, Yet Was Jesus Physically Or Literally With Them “Each And Every Day Until The End Of The Age" ?
    Since The Answer To That Question Seems Fairly Obvious (Mark 14:62; Revelation 1:7), They Would Probably Then Follow Up With: “So, The Question Really Becomes, In What Way Or “Sense” Was The Criminal To Be “With” Jesus In “Paradise” ?
    Of Course, That’s Where The Fun Would Begin. They Would Then Go On To Explain Their Doctrinal View Of “Paradise”, Which Could Make The Argument You Have And The One They Have Simply Turn Into A Debate Over Doctrinal Interpretation, Which Apparently Wouldn’t Go Very Far Inasmuch As Any Real Clarity On That Particular Doctrine May Simply Not Be Fully Authenticated Until The “Judge” Arrives Anyway - John 5:22-29 (Compare Daniel 12:4, 9; 1 Corinthians 13:10-12, Etc)
    Lol ………“Can’t We All Just Get Along ?” - 1 Corinthians 8:1-3

    • @kowalskib6391
      @kowalskib6391 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sm Mn Jesus saying He will be with them until the end of the age, further proves that God's spirit which he has given to dwell in those who are saved and Jesus are one. Jehova's witnesses are said to deny this.

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sm Mn Here is the problem though. The Watchtower doesn't really answer the question. It isn't, how will Jesus be with the evildoer? It is, how will the evildoer be with Jesus?

    • @smmn1316
      @smmn1316 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +EvidenceMinistries
      I Definitely Hear You, But That’s The Whole Point With Them. If You Don’t Nail Down The Facts, They’ll Have Another Answer That Is Hard To Get Around, Turning It Into A Debate Over Words.
      For Example, You Ask: “How Will The Evildoer Be With Jesus ?”
      Their Answer Might Simply Be John 3:5, Shifting The Burden Of Proof Upon You To Prove That The Evildoer Was Born Again In The Manner Jesus Described Or Whether Jesus’ Words At John 3:5 Meant What They Say Or Not.
      Then They Would Undoubtedly Say, “Therefore, The Question Is Not Whether The Evildoer Would Be With Jesus In Paradise, Because Jesus’ Words Cannot Be Nullified, The Question Is, In What Sense Would The Person “Be With” Jesus In Paradise, Which Is Essentially The Same Question Someone Must Ask About Matthew 28:20 Regarding Jesus Being “With” His Disciples As Well.
      That’s Why I Actually Responded, Because If You Really Want To Pin Their Doctrine Down, I Think You May Need Stronger Proof Of The Error You Believe Characterizes Their Doctrine. The Question Is Certainly Reasonable Though.

    • @paulconcadora9395
      @paulconcadora9395 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question, like people today believe that Jesus christ is with them, at or in all kinds of situations, people say Jesus christ was with us or with me or with them, is quite common sayings of our time, so in the same sense, he will be with the criminal at the point of spirituality, but then that leaves the question is the paradise a spiritual place and not a human sense of existence but as spirit creachers,like Jesus christ explanations of the one's in the resurrection, they are nether males or females, but are like the angels they don't marry each other, when they asked if a woman married a man and he died, and his brother then married the woman, and he died, and then the other brother married the same woman, and then he died, which of them would be married to the woman in the resurrection, and Jesus christ said none of them, because in the resurrection, they are not males or females, but are like the angels of heaven, they don't marry each other,the same as the paradise situation, they are spirit creachers, right or wrong,

  • @ewankerr3011
    @ewankerr3011 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you thick? Being with someone, whether God or Jesus, does nor literally mean being in their presence. There are lots of biblical references about God being with his people, but it never means that he was actually there.

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for being a contestant on, "Adventures in missing the point!" Congratulations, you WIN!

    • @ewankerr3011
      @ewankerr3011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EvidenceMinistries : Did it take you a whole year to come up with that ? LOL !

    • @EvidenceMinistries
      @EvidenceMinistries  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ewankerr3011 Nope. I haven't been keeping up with replying to comments, but yours was so obviously out in left field that I thought I'd let you know you are a winner

    • @ewankerr3011
      @ewankerr3011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EvidenceMinistries : LOL !