The rise of China in global science

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ธ.ค. 2020
  • Speaker: Professor Simon Marginson, Department of Education.
    Since 1990, global science has expanded with exceptional dynamism and relations of power within it have shifted markedly.
    Grass roots collaborative networks have become established as the main medium of development; Euro-American national science systems have become intensively networked as a global duopoly; and many middle-income countries have built their own national science systems. These include a group of countries that have followed a semi ‘stand-alone’ trajectory, establishing robust national systems based on government investment, national network building and selective international connections, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The stand-alone trajectory, which is nationally nuanced and does not comply with Euro-American patterns (and hence is not always understood in the literature on science) has been successfully pursued in all East Asian countries except Vietnam. China, which had almost no presence in global science forty years ago, is now number two science country, number one in areas of STEM physical sciences.
    The seminar will investigate developments in China in funding, science paper output, the discipline balance, internationalisation strategy, and national and global networking, explaining how China has successfully combined global activity and local/national activity in positive sum fashion in a strongly nationally-nested science system. It will also discuss limits of the achievement, and note that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is in prospect.
    ABOUT THE SPEAKER
    Simon Marginson is Professor of Higher Education at the University of Oxford, Director of the ESRC/OFSRE Centre for Global Higher Education (CGHE), Editor-in-Chief of Higher Education, Professorial Associate of the Melbourne Centre for Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne, and Lead Researcher with Higher School of Economics in Moscow. CGHE is a research partnership of five UK and nine international universities with £9 million in funding for 16 projects on global, national and local aspects of higher education in 2015-2023.
    Simon’s research is focused primarily on global and international higher education, higher education in East Asia, and higher education and social inequality. He is currently preparing an integrated theorisation of higher education. He Co-Chaired the UK Higher Education Commission Inquiry into Education Exports which reported in 2018. His most recent books are Changing Higher Education for a Changing World, edited with Claire Callender and William Locke (Bloomsbury, 2020) and High Participation Systems of Higher Education, edited with Brendan Cantwell and Anna Smolentseva (Oxford University Press, 2018).
    Learn more about Simon here
    AUDIENCE
    This seminar will be of interest to: scholars and students of science, of China studies and of higher education and research; university professionals with responsibility for international relations and research; China and East Asia specialists.

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @matubalfaisal2600
    @matubalfaisal2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    God bless China 🇨🇳✊✊✊✊

    • @medialcanthus9681
      @medialcanthus9681 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ditto 💞

    • @matubalfaisal2600
      @matubalfaisal2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @crazywarlord777 no one cause trouble to Muslims in world history more than what the west did. so go read history dummy.

    • @dellam5144
      @dellam5144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @crazywarlord777 Chinese are Religion neutral. For example, my best friend in University is from Xinjiang. We got along well since she is an intelligent and kind person. Which religion she is practicing never played a role in our relationship. We just don’t care. In every university in China, there is a muslin canteen, since the muslin diet is respected. Uyghur Restaurants around our university were very popular among non-muslin students as well. They offer good food. You can also look for mosques from googlemap or Baidumap. There are plenty in each city. The tense between muslin and Christian I am experiencing here in Europe is not there in China. Maybe it is time for you to reflect why the muslin world is not blaming China while the Christian world is shouting that loud?

    • @dellam5144
      @dellam5144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      crazywarlord777 I offered the solution to verify my statements. You can just use google map. People never double check information are always confident about their baseless conclusions.

    • @alexma3939
      @alexma3939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@crazywarlord777 guy ,except lies you trust nothing, for your symptom , my suggestion ,you should reach madhouse, be careful, to bedlam rough road could make your brain more bad situation, good luck and god bless you

  • @wynetsang
    @wynetsang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Science and Civilization in China (1954-present) is an ongoing series of books about the history of science and technology in China published by Cambridge University Press. It was initiated and edited by British historian Joseph Needham (1900-1995).

  • @teongbengang9515
    @teongbengang9515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good job

  • @derek3266
    @derek3266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Are there no combs in Britain? Perhaps China 🇨🇳 could help..?

    • @clocktower1164
      @clocktower1164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No comb needed. A pair of scissor should be provided.

  • @batumaungben9201
    @batumaungben9201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Communism a social science fr d west, which's perhaps by humanity aptly suitable for a 1.4b China. China has been hugely changing n is becoming, part of it accepting many constructive criticals n actions not published in western media? Aren't there any democracies within her communism, are they?

    • @Andrew-rc3vh
      @Andrew-rc3vh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They operate a democracy, but not a party political democracy. The views of the people are continually monitored and the constitution says the CCP go with mainstream opinion. Regarding communism, the thing they practice they call communism with Chinese characteristics, meaning central tenet of communism representing the common people still stands, but Marxist economics is out, and has been for a long time. They like to think of their system as innovative,so they experiment and try new things as would suit the current times. What they are not is ideological. It's more like pragmatism. They were ideological in Mao's time and things went badly wrong because of it.